reSee.it - Related Video Feed

The speaker believes all vaccines are suspect. As an emergency medicine physician, the speaker thought vaccines only contained a dead or attenuated virus and saline. In September 2000, after reading a package insert and researching vaccines, the speaker was mortified to learn that a child receiving all scheduled vaccines gets almost 13,000 micrograms of aluminum, almost 600 micrograms of mercury, and over 200 chemicals. The speaker states that this is why vaccines have never been proven safe, and vaccination is like injecting foreign matter into a baby.

The speaker questions the safety of 5,000 micrograms for children under six. They claim many vaccine trials use an aluminum adjuvant containing placebo or other aluminum-containing vaccines as the control group. The speaker argues that because the control group receives aluminum, the study is invalidated. They further claim that countries with less aggressive vaccine schedules do not have significant trends in autistic diagnoses. They state that the Amish community, which is largely unvaccinated, has extremely low rates of autism diagnoses.

Speaker 0 argues that to determine whether smoking causes lung cancer, you must compare smokers to non-smokers. They recount a sequence of flawed study designs that would falsely conclude no link: comparing two smokers with different consumption levels and finding the same cancer rates; comparing different cigarette brands among smokers and again finding no difference; comparing people in different towns who all smoke and finding no difference. The point is that all these comparisons fail because they do not include a non-smoker control group; thus they cannot establish causation. They then contrast this with vaccine studies, asserting that studies claiming vaccines don’t cause chronic diseases or autism do not compare vaccinated to unvaccinated children. Instead, such studies compare vaccinated children to other vaccinated children, with variations in vaccines received (e.g., MMR, DTaP, multiple vaccines in one visit) and with differing aluminum exposures (e.g., four milligrams vs two milligrams). They emphasize that these studies never examine the actual outcome of interest by comparing vaccinated against unvaccinated children. The speaker maintains that this flaw in vaccine studies mirrors the earlier tobacco example. The essential argument is that the only way to determine causation is to compare the exposure group (vaccinated children) to an appropriate control group (unvaccinated children). They reference the Henry Ford trial as an example of an unvaccinated-versus-vaccinated comparison, but note that no one has published or accessible data from it. They call for someone brave enough to conduct and publish a vaccinated-versus-unvaccinated study to settle the issue. Finally, they challenge proponents of vaccination to conduct such a study to prove their position, insisting that if vaccines are truly safe and non-causal for chronic diseases or autism, the study should be done and the data published to demonstrate that the claim is correct. The overall message is a insistence on direct, unambiguous vaccinated-versus-unvaccinated comparisons to establish causality, highlighting perceived gaps in current vaccine research and urging transparent data publication.

Speaker 1 says aluminum “provokes an allergic response” and is valuable because adding aluminum to a vaccine with a viral antigen causes the body to mount an allergic response to that viral antigen (including polio, hepatitis B, HPV, or others). Speaker 1 then claims that the science suggests aluminum also creates allergic responses to “anything that’s in the ambient environment.” They state that if a vaccine includes a peanut oil excipient and contains aluminum, it could lead to a lifetime allergy to peanuts; likewise, if there is a Timothy weed outbreak during the week a person receives an aluminum vaccine, it could lead to a lifetime allergy to Timothy weed. Speaker 1 cites “two studies by Moss and Cowlings,” claiming children vaccinated with aluminum vaccines have a “30 times” higher rate of allergic rhinitis than children who do not. They also say food allergy “epidemics” began at the time aluminum vaccines started being given to children. Speaker 1 explains personal involvement, stating that because their children have allergies, they are a founder of the Food Allergy Initiative and the Food Allergy Network, described as the biggest food allergy research group. They say the group’s scientists give food allergies to rats and figure out how to treat them. Speaker 1 claims the method involves taking the aluminum adjuvant from the hepatitis B vaccine, which they say has a latex molecule; they then claim the rat develops a permanent latex allergy. Speaker 1 adds that adding a peanut molecule leads to a permanent peanut allergy, and adding a dairy molecule leads to a permanent dairy allergy. They conclude by asserting that “this whole generation of children is allergic to stuff” because allergies are being induced by “pumping them full of aluminum.”

Speaker 0 states that Girl Scout cookies are a problem. They tested 13 different types of cookies from 25 states, including California, Iowa, and one other state, and the results were published on momsacrossamerica.org. The tests reported 100% positive for glyphosate and 100% positive for heavy metals, at alarming levels. Over 88% of the cookies contained all five of the toxic metals tested: aluminum, arsenic, cadmium, mercury, and lead. The speaker notes that some of these toxic metals can leave permanent lifetime damage. They claim that over 80% of the Girl Scout cookies had lead levels higher than what the EPA allows. They also state that the aluminum was up to 300 times higher than the exposure level people are supposed to be exposed to, with aluminum readings described as possibly being in the parts per million range (around 29 parts per million). The speaker suggests a possible source for the high aluminum levels, speculating that it could be related to geoengineering, since aluminum is sprayed to manipulate clouds to create rain, though they say further testing needs to be done on that hypothesis.

According to the speaker, most vaccines have never been tested in a randomized, placebo-controlled trial to evaluate their safety. The speaker claims that vaccines contain aluminum compounds because many dead vaccines don't mount an immune response without them. The speaker alleges that in a Gardasil vaccine study, the placebo group received an aluminum adjuvant instead of a true placebo, resulting in similar side effect profiles between the active vaccine and placebo groups. The speaker asserts that Merck used a novel aluminum compound and that data suggests aluminum in vaccines is profoundly toxic. The speaker states that the only true randomized controlled trial involving a vaccine was conducted on sheep with blue tongue disease. The results allegedly showed that the aluminum in the vaccine was toxic, causing the sheep to become sick, unsociable, and, in some cases, die. The speaker concludes that the assumption that aluminum adjuvants in vaccines are safe is unfounded and has never been tested.

Speaker 0 argues that the original study relied heavily on statistical modeling, rather than presenting basic raw proportions. When they examined the raw proportions, they found that every single one of the 22 chronic disease categories was proportionally higher in the vaccinated group, including cancer. The speaker notes that the study claimed there was no difference in cancer, treating cancer as a control, but asserts there was a difference in cancer when looking at raw data. They claim that for rare outcomes, the modeling used in the study is not very reliable, and no basic proportional analysis was performed by the original authors. However, when they conducted such an analysis themselves, they found cancer was fifty-four percent higher in the vaccinated group compared to the unvaccinated children. The speaker concludes that there is biological plausibility behind these findings.

Speaker 0 argues that a critical missing piece in autism research is vaccinated versus unvaccinated studies, and notes there are six good studies to rely on. They claim these studies have been systematically suppressed and ignored by the mainstream media and the medical establishment. The summary of specific study claims is as follows: - Two studies by Gallier and Goodman show that the birth dose of the hepatitis B vaccine significantly increases autism risk. - Three studies by Anthony Mawson confirmed that vaccination increases the odds of developing autism by at least 4.2-fold. - Preterm birth coupled with vaccination increases the odds of neurodevelopmental disability by more than 12-fold compared to preterm birth without vaccination. - A study by Hooker and Miller published in 2021 found that vaccination increases autism risk five-fold. - Vaccination in the absence of breastfeeding increases autism risk 12.5-fold. - Vaccination in addition to cesarean birth increases autism risk 18.7-fold. The speaker states that after conducting a systematic review of a thousand studies, their belief is that the autism and chronic disease epidemics are primarily caused by toxicants, mostly from vaccines and about a dozen additional toxicants.

A discussion compares the current state of humanity to “the days of Noah,” claiming that humanity is back to a time when the Nephilim were changing humanity, and that Noah and his family were the only ones “pure left on the planet.” The speakers define “pure” as human DNA as made originally by God, unaltered by man’s science, and assert that the only pure humans still remaining on earth are the unvaccinated, stating that vaccinated people “have allowed these new Nimrods to change your DNA” and that “your body will never be the same.” Another speaker describes observing blood changes after recreating a process on people, saying they see bubbles and formations they associate with liver congestion and breaking down blood, and that anomalies become more noticeable once the body starts to decompose. They claim red blood cells form masses that can evolve or morph into something else, while asserting it “hasn’t started yet” but “it could happen while we’re sitting here.” A further participant presents claims from photographs of cells before and after “the injection,” describing “chains” of “white nanoparticles” and blood cells becoming “covered with lumps and protrusions” rather than being smooth and symmetrical. They call it an “intentional world war on human blood,” and mention names including Dr. Sherry, Tim Penny, and Luke Montagner. Legal claims are also discussed: the U.S. Supreme Court is referenced as ruling that vaccinated people worldwide are “products, patented goods,” and that through modified DNA or RNA vaccination, “the mRNA vaccination… ceases to be human forever,” becoming “the owner of the holder of the modified gen vaccination patent.” The claim includes loss of “human rights” and “no religious exemptions,” and states that this applies worldwide and that patents are subject to U.S. law since 2013. Another speaker quotes a Supreme Court holding about synthetically creating DNA from an mRNA molecule and concludes that synthetic genomes can be patentable as intellectual property, asking whether vaccines create a new genome within people, and answering that they do. Nanotechnology and ingredients are discussed through claims about “self-assembling nanotech” in Pfizer mRNA vaccines, based on optical microscopy analysis. The conclusions described include using nanotechnology to form networks capable of controlling nanomachines, and that graphene oxide is a key component. The discussion further ties graphene’s activation to microwave signals in gigahertz ranges, boosted to terahertz, and links the cited “optimal frequency” to 26 gigahertz, described as the frequency put out by 5G. Wireless monitoring and consent are emphasized with claims that 2020 was not about a virus and that swabs are “nanosensor[s]” embedded in cartilage for life, describing “WBAN wireless body area network” nodes and frequencies “up to 60 gigahertz.” Another speaker predicts a “second wave” caused by vaccine-induced injury compounded by fear and by “new technology,” described as 5G, alleging disruption of voltage-gated calcium channels and increased permeability to pathogens. One speaker claims an internal Pfizer document reveals mRNA production processes manipulated to include a “very dangerous toxin,” naming graphene oxide, and asserts each 30-milligram shot contains 15 billion nanoparticles or lipid carrier particles. They claim graphene oxide builds structures after spike binding and cite outcomes such as blood clots and heart failure. The same speaker asserts the patent databases accessed prove COVID-19 and COVID-19 vaccines are “a bioweapon,” referencing “mysteriously deleted Wuhan databases.” Environmental exposure is discussed via water testing: aluminum in rain and snow is claimed to be extremely high compared to expected zero, with figures including 13,100 micrograms per liter in rain in 2013 and 61,000 micrograms per liter in snow on Mount Shasta. The transcript ends with a reiteration that the only “pure humans” are unvaccinated and that vaccinated people have allowed changes to DNA that will not leave the body “the same.”

Speaker 0 explains how, in their account, food allergies in rats can be induced: giving a rat the aluminum adjuvant from the hepatitis B vaccine together with a peanut protein is said to result in a permanent peanut allergy; combining the aluminum adjuvant with a dairy protein is said to produce a dairy allergy; combining the aluminum adjuvant with a latex protein is said to produce a latex allergy. Speaker 0 then connects this to vaccines more broadly by stating that there are “vaccines that not only had that aluminum adjuvant in it, but they had peanut oil excipients in them,” and claims this process “gave a whole generation peanut allergies.” They also state that they “now know” the allergy is not limited to other ingredients present in the vaccine, but can arise from the interaction of the aluminum adjuvant with environmental exposures during the relevant time window. The argument continues with an example involving outdoor allergens. Speaker 0 says that if a child receives the aluminum adjuvant (specifically referencing the hepatitis B vaccine) at a time when there is a Timothy weed outbreak, “that child may now have a permanent allergy to Timothy weed.” Speaker 0 further asserts that allergy development can occur when the aluminum adjuvant is administered at the same time that an environmental allergen is present. Speaker 0 cites a study by Mawson to support a relationship between vaccination and allergic conditions. They state that the Mawson study “shows that children who got that vaccine have 30 times the rate of allergic rhinitis as children who are unvaccinated.” Speaker 0 then uses this to address the prevalence of over-the-counter allergy medication, stating that this is the reason “all the claritin is being sold and all of these kids, all these kids have allergies today.” In the conclusion, Speaker 0 summarizes the causal chain they are describing by stating that the source of these widespread allergies is “the aluminum in the vaccine.”

Zen from Moms Across America states that Panera Bread had the highest level of glyphosate among all of the top 20 fast food restaurants tested. They acknowledge Panera’s public claim of “clean ingredients,” and emphasize that glyphosate is not clean. Glyphosate, known widely as Roundup, is described as the most widely used herbicide in the world. It is called a carcinogen and an endocrine disruptor, and is said to cause liver and kidney disease. It is described as a neurotoxin and a nervous system damager, and is said to kill sperm and to androgenize baby girls. The speaker notes that these effects are from animal studies. Zen mentions that there are many human studies as well showing a connection to increased miscarriages and prenatal births and birth defects. The message is that Panera Bread needs to do better, and they should put glyphosate on their no-no list and require that their suppliers only provide wheat and grains that have not been sprayed with glyphosate. The speaker states that they are asking Panera to do that, and that thousands of signatures are needed. The speaker urges viewers to visit momsacrossamerica.org, click on action, and find the fast food petitions page under action. The goal is to help get Panera to put glyphosate on the no-no list, describing this as a huge win for the food industry because Panera is one of the biggest purchasers of wheat products, using it for sandwich breads across the country. The appeal is for petition signatures to press Panera to adopt a glyphosate-free standard for their ingredients.

Speaker 1 says they feel they have “unlocked a new level of awakening” and that they no longer fear being labeled anti-vax. They claim “the truth is out there,” pointing to vaccine “inserts” that they say show “aborted fetuses” in vaccine ingredient lists, along with “other animal cells.” Speaker 1 says they watched a “two hour lecture” that “broke it down” in a “factual” way by timeline and “connected the dots,” and that they then looked everything up themselves and found “it’s all true.” They describe their conclusion about Roe v. Wade, saying Roe v. Wade “was not meant for women’s rights,” was “not made to protect women and their bodies,” and was instead not intended to give women the opportunity to have an abortion “if they need it.” They also say “the propaganda is real,” that it “all makes sense,” and that it is “disgusting” to use “aborted fetuses” to make vaccines. Speaker 1 then says that anyone who thinks otherwise, “I don’t care anymore,” and ends by saying “yes I’m anti-vaccine.” Speaker 0 responds by stating that “unfortunately what this nurse is saying is true.” Speaker 0 claims that vaccines “currently used in the U.S.” are “produced using human cells,” and that these cell lines were “originally derived from abortions.” They add that this began “in the 1960s,” and that “the viruses are grown in these cells and purified” with “trace DNA” that “may remain in very small minute amounts.” Speaker 0 says this is “why there is very good cause for religious exemptions for a lot of vaccines” and states that major religious bodies, including “the Vatican,” addressed these “moral concerns.” Speaker 0 lists examples of vaccines they say still use these cell lines: “the MMR vaccine,” “the chickenpox vaccine,” “hepatitis A,” and “rabies.” They also say “some of the COVID-19 vaccines also use it.” Speaker 0 emphasizes that religious exemptions were “so important,” adding that “some Democrat states” tried to deny them. Speaker 0 concludes by saying that while “a lot of vaccines do not use them,” “a lot of vaccines do use them,” and therefore people should “have to be very careful if this is something that you’re worried about.”

A recent paper reported that two-month-old infants who received all six CDC-recommended vaccines had about a 68% increased odds of dying in the following month compared to unvaccinated infants. The speaker says this adds to a body of evidence described as 12 studies comparing vaccinated individuals to unvaccinated individuals. According to the speaker, all 12 studies found the same overall pattern: vaccinated individuals are “far sicker” than unvaccinated individuals. The speaker lists multiple categories of health differences reported in those comparisons, stating that vaccinated individuals have more chronic disease and more autoimmune disease. They also report higher rates of neurodevelopmental disorders, including autism, speech delays, and speech disorders. The speaker also says vaccinated individuals have more ticks and more skin disorders, describing these as part of “everything under the sun.” The speaker then describes an additional analysis related to the Henry Ford study. They say they “recently expanded on that in a reanalysis of the Henry Ford study,” finding that all 22 chronic disease categories were higher in vaccinated children. This is presented as extending the pattern beyond the specific mortality finding, adding chronic disease elevations alongside mortality elevation. The speaker characterizes the combined results as “very serious” and emphasizes that it should be discussed more widely and replicated in other states. The call to action is focused on starting to talk about the findings and replicating them elsewhere, rather than limiting the conclusions to the initial studies or settings described.

The speaker claims that this is not conspiracy theory and cites a BMJ publication by Retzaf Levy, which describes a process in vaccine development: vaccines were trialed under one formulation, but when the decision was made to deploy them globally, the process was changed and the product injected to the rest of the world. The speaker asserts that changing the process requires new trials, yet the EMA asked for an additional trial of 250 people after the process change, and that data was never delivered. This is described as a “bait and switch,” asserted as crucial for understanding why trial data is of zero consequence to what’s seen in the field, implying that real-world outcomes do not match trial data and that the numbers from trials are a caricature of field performance. The speaker claims Pfizer had early data indicating what would happen and acted on that by acquiring cancer companies: $43,000,000,000 into the acquisition of C Gen and $2,260,000,000 to acquire Trillium Therapeutics. Trillium is described as focused on blood cancers with the CD147 marker (CD Adaptor 147) on them, a marker claimed to be known to be involved in COVID. The implication is that Pfizer is building an investment portfolio in cancer companies that would benefit from the consequences the speaker alleges they caused. In summary, the vaccines on the market are said to be not the same formulation as what was tested in clinical trials, labeling this a “bait and switch” and a fraud, and asserting that vaccine effectiveness numbers are not reliable because the products differ from trial formulations and because those numbers decay over time. The speaker alleges significant DNA contamination, stating that 10 out of 11 studies have found this, with the remaining studies allegedly constrained by financial conflicts. The claim is that consensus among real studies supports DNA contamination, with several studies through peer review, which the speaker notes is difficult for those papers to pass through peer review. It is claimed that five peer-reviewed studies not originally examining contamination found DNA in blood and tissue upon sleuthing. The speaker asserts that cancer is on the rise and that several papers report cancer post-vaccination, including neoplasms at the site of injection. The claim is that this situation cannot be dismissed as coincidence and is described as “liability free” and often mandated. The speaker posits that this may be the largest carcinogenic hit to the human population, with vaccines on childhood schedules and given to pregnant women, stating that “this has gone absolutely off the rails.”

MSG in food is considered bad, but MSG in vaccines is considered good. Aluminum in deodorant is bad, but aluminum in vaccines is good. Glyphosate on food is bad, but glyphosate in vaccines is good. Formaldehyde in building materials is bad, but formaldehyde in vaccines is good. Mercury in fish is bad, but mercury in vaccines is considered good.

Rats can be given food allergies by administering aluminum adjuvant from the hepatitis B vaccine along with a specific protein like peanut or dairy. This induces a permanent allergy to that protein. Vaccines not only contain aluminum adjuvant but also peanut oil excipients, potentially contributing to peanut allergies in a generation. The aluminum adjuvant can also trigger allergies to substances in the environment at the time of vaccination, such as Timothy weed. A study by Mawson indicates that vaccinated children have 30 times the rate of allergic rhinitis compared to unvaccinated children. The speaker claims that the prevalence of allergies in children is linked to the aluminum in vaccines.

The speaker hired an expert to analyze data from 2,700 variably vaccinated and 560 unvaccinated patients in their practice, age-matched for comparison. The speaker claims the data, available at doctorsandscience.com, reveals significant differences in health outcomes. According to the speaker's slides, unvaccinated children had lower rates of asthma, allergic rhinitis, eczema, sinusitis, gastroenteritis, respiratory infections, otitis media, conjunctivitis, other infections, breathing issues, and behavioral issues like ADD/ADHD. The speaker states there were no cases of ADD/ADHD in unvaccinated patients over 10 years. The speaker suggests vaccines shift the immune system towards allergy and autoimmunity, leading to more infections. The speaker argues that the association between vaccines and negative health outcomes is not coincidental, citing multiple studies and mechanisms of action, including aluminum and immune activation from too many vaccines too soon. The speaker states that the medical board revoked their license in response to this study.

The speaker states they searched for years for a pre-licensing safety trial of the 72 vaccine doses effectively mandated for American children. They claim that every other medication requires a safety trial comparing health outcomes in a placebo group versus a vaccine group before FDA licensing. The speaker assumed this was also done for vaccines. They state they found out that vaccines were exempt from this requirement.

The speaker claims that the MMR vaccine contains millions of pieces from cultured cell lines derived from aborted fetuses. They allege the rubella virus is grown on these cell lines. The speaker references a study involving over 70 healthy fetuses aborted specifically for research. According to the speaker, these fetuses were dissected into small pieces, and attempts were made to culture viruses on them to determine the optimal body part for virus growth. The speaker states that some of these abortions occurred past the first trimester.

According to the speaker, vaccines have never been tested in a randomized, placebo-controlled trial to evaluate their safety. The speaker claims that vaccines contain aluminum compounds because many dead vaccines don't mount an immune response without them. The speaker alleges that in a Gardasil vaccine study, the placebo group received an aluminum adjuvant instead of a true placebo, so the side effect profiles of the active vaccine and placebo groups were the same. The speaker asserts that Merck used a novel aluminum compound and that data shows aluminum in vaccines is toxic. The speaker states that the only completely randomized controlled trial was on sheep using a vaccine for blue tongue disease. The speaker claims the aluminum was toxic, the sheep became sick, their behavior changed, and many died compared to the placebo group. The speaker concludes that the presumption that aluminum as an adjuvant is safe is unfounded and has never been tested.

Speaker 1 states that no vaccines, including the COVID vaccine, have been properly tested. They claim that no childhood vaccine has undergone a placebo-controlled clinical trial of sufficient duration and power to assess its safety before being injected into millions of children in America. Speaker 1 asserts this is not an opinion, but can be verified by anyone reviewing package inserts and clinical trial documents on the FDA website.

Speaker 0 says: Today’s discussion covers the Lyme situation and claims about vaccines. The claim is that you were injected with gelatin as a child through vaccines, which made you allergic to ticks. Ticks are said to not cause disease, just to be aware. A PubMed article is cited about the association between tick bites, allergic reactions, and gelatin-containing vaccines causing the allergic reaction. Some people insist they didn’t get vaccines with gelatin, but Speaker 0 argues childhood vaccines actually contain it. Speaker 0 claims that the vaccine intended to save you is new, yet there was a past version that resulted in many lawsuits, implying a repeated pattern. The discussion then shifts to Lyme disease: if someone has Lyme, they allegedly had a PCR test that amplified the results to tell them they had an illness to sell a treatment and induce fear of ticks. Speaker 0 lists symptoms claimed to be Lyme disease: fevers, chills, headaches, fatigue, muscle aches, swollen lymph nodes, and facial palsy. These are described as side effects of vaccines as well. Even someone who says they didn’t take any vaccines is asked about exposure to wireless technology at home (microwaving), and pesticide exposure, which are claimed to cause the same symptoms. Speaker 0 references books on related topics: Peanut Allergy Epidemic, Contagion Myth, and The Poison Needle. The overarching claim is that “almost all illnesses result from vaccines, wireless, and pesticides.” Speaker 0 offers a supposed remedy: for any bug bite, use dragon’s blood and coconut oil, saying it heals ticks bites, wasps, spiders, bees quickly. The statement is presented as an example of why people were allergic to peanuts, tying vaccine use to broader allergy development. Speaker 0 concludes by reiterating the pattern: you get vaccinated, you become allergic to ticks; you get vaccinated, you become allergic to peanuts; the same mechanism is claimed to be at play.

A lab owner who previously worked at Monsanto tested five childhood vaccines for glyphosate. All five vaccines tested positive for glyphosate. This is considered statistically significant because when 20 Pediasure feeding tube liquid samples were tested for glyphosate, only six came back positive. The levels for the MMR vaccine were 25 times higher than the other vaccines. This is believed to be because the MMR vaccine is a live virus vaccine, and 25% of it must be gelatin to stabilize the live virus. The gelatin comes from pigs fed GMO grains containing glyphosate.

Glyphosate is found in tendons, joints, and bones, potentially contributing to fragile bones and bone density problems. Anthony Samsall found glyphosate in vaccines and a horse's hoof. Maps show increasing glyphosate use across the US. Avoiding glyphosate entirely in the US is difficult, but eating certified organic food helps. Glyphosate causes autism by destroying the gut. Vaccines also contain glyphosate, potentially contributing to their toxicity. Injecting glyphosate into the body, especially with aluminum, is extremely toxic. Live virus vaccines contain glyphosate but not aluminum, while other shots given simultaneously often contain aluminum, creating a dangerous mix when combined.

Speaker 0 argues that, when re-examining the data from the original study, the raw numbers reveal a different pattern than what the study’s modeling suggested. Specifically, they state that, in the raw proportions, every single one of the 22 chronic disease categories was proportionally higher in the vaccinated group. This includes cancer, which the study reportedly treated as a control condition and claimed there was no difference for. According to Speaker 0, the study’s use of cancer as a control is at odds with the raw data they observed. They claim that there was a difference in cancer outcomes, contrary to the study’s implication of no difference. They emphasize that, with rare outcomes, the modeling employed in the original analysis is not very reliable, and as a result, the study did not perform any basic proportional analysis. Speaker 0 states that when they performed a basic proportional analysis themselves, cancer was fifty-four percent higher in the vaccinated group compared to the unvaccinated children. They mention that this result is “explained biologically” and assert that there is biological plausibility behind it. Key points: - Raw proportions show all 22 chronic disease categories higher in the vaccinated group, including cancer. - The original study used cancer as a control and claimed no difference, which Speaker 0 disputes based on the raw data. - Modeling for rare outcomes is described as not very reliable. - A basic proportional analysis by Speaker 0 indicates cancer is 54% higher in the vaccinated group versus the unvaccinated. - A biological explanation or plausibility is asserted for the observed cancer difference in the vaccinated group.