TruthArchive.ai - Related Video Feed

Johnson & Johnson is recalling Neutrogena and Aveeno sunscreens due to benzene contamination. Benzene is a colorless, odorless chemical linked to cancer, particularly leukemia. Despite generating $81.6 billion in revenue, only $14 billion comes from consumer products like sunscreen; the majority is from pharmaceuticals and medical devices. Their growth is driven by drugs like IMBRUVICA and DARZALEX, which are used to treat leukemia. This raises questions about the presence of a known carcinogen in their sunscreens.

Vaccines don't cause autism. The science is clear. Vaccines don't cause autism. Vaccines do not cause autism. I do not deny that we need to do more about autism, but it has nothing to do with vaccines. We have thoroughly debunked any association between autism and these vaccines. Robert, it is nearly consensus in the scientific community that there's no link there. To deny a mountain of scientific evidence, which has already taught us that the combination of measles, mumps, rubella, or MMR vaccine doesn't cause autism, Vimerosal, an ethylmercury containing preservative that wasn't a number of vaccines doesn't cause autism, and that too many vaccines given too soon, if you will, doesn't also cause autism. We know that the schedule is safe. Are there peer reviewed scientific reports that indicate a link between No. Between vaccines and autism? No. Not only is there not a peer reviewed work, this is probably the most studied public health issue involving children. Vaccines are really the one thing we have looked at as causing autism. The Institutes of Medicine, the Centers for Disease Control have repeatedly investigated this. Vaccines do not cause autism. We don't need more research. At some point, enough is enough. It's fine to continue to collect data, but at some point, you have to take note for an answer. We're not sure what causes autism, but we know that vaccines do not. Mountains of evidence. No, you know, this has been looked at extensively. Nothing's been more studied in the world than this connection between vaccines and autism. We'd heard it. We've heard it for decades. You know, actually almost a century now, if you want to get into it. This has been the battle cry of the pharmaceutical industry and every shill that works for them. But whether you know it or not all the way back in 2020 for those of you that were watching then we actually disproved this myth right then. Debunked it with a lawsuit where we went at the CDC and said really if the head of your page on the CDC website says vaccines plural meaning all vaccines do not cause us to do we have that original website. This is what it said: vaccines do not cause autism. There it is. All vaccines doesn't say one of them or two of them all vaccines by the plural s at the end of vaccines. If vaccines do not cause autism will you please provide us with all of the evidence and studies that show that vaccines don't cause autism. Send us that evidence. Well they didn't and we sued them and we went to court. Back in 2020, we won the case. Here it looks like in the document. They gave us the list. It's actually 20 studies. 20 total studies make up the entire list of what they look to when they say that these childhood vaccines, the five, and the cumulative effects of them given in the first six months of life, do not cause autism. The first one is an MMR study. The second one an MMR and a DTaP study. The next ones are MMR, these four are MMR and Thimerosal studies. Then the next all the way through to 20 are all just Thimerosal studies. Lastly, we have one antigen study. Of the 20 studies, the first MMR studies are not in the first six months of life; Thimerosal studies show none of the vaccines in the first six months of life had Thimerosal. There was only one study relevant to the first six months of life, the IOM review of the DTaP vaccine, and it said there are no studies that prove or disprove the association with autism. Therefore, that was the only one that was relevant to the first six months of life, and it proved that they had no answers. And so for everyone that's ever sent Mountain of Evidence, that's been a lie. We won in court. It's a lie. You can take that to the bank. And actually just months after winning that lawsuit, that was in May, by August they pulled down the statement vaccines do not cause autism. We celebrated it but five months later it went back up and we've been stuck there with this propaganda statement that have no basis in science up until last night when this happened to the website. Let's see the new page. Here it is. It now says autism and vaccines and right under that it has the key points. So we read those key points. The claim vaccines do not cause autism is not an evidence-based claim because studies have not ruled out the possibility that infant vaccines cause autism, meaning those vaccines in the first six months of life. Meaning the IOM lawsuit that proved that. Studies supporting a link have been ignored by health authorities. HHS has launched a comprehensive assessment of the causes of autism, including investigations on plausible biologic mechanisms and potential causal links. It does have an explanatory statement I want to read right now. It says this about why you will still see it with an asterisk the header vaccines do not cause autism has not been completely removed due to an agreement with the chair of the U.S. Senate Health, Education, Labor and Pensions Committee that it would remain on the CDC website. Apparently, this was that backroom deal that was made with Senator Cassidy, of course, when Robert Kennedy Jr. was up there. But now you can see on the page it is clear we are making the statement or it's being made by the CDC that this is not a scientific statement and so ultimately this is a massive change. I tweeted out about it today and to every parent of an autistic child that's been out there. For every one of you that did interviews, whether in the film Vaxxed or when we toured the nation and for everyone that's ever been gaslit, the days of gaslighting are over. We are now moving into science-based, evidence-based statements on the CDC website. It's a beautiful day.

This discussion centers on Tylenol (acetaminophen) exposure and its role in autism. Dr. Nisha Patel claims, 'There is no proven link between Tylenol use in pregnancy and autism,' adding Tylenol is 'one of the very few safe medications available for pain and discomfort during pregnancy.' Mount Sinai meta-analysis concludes evidence 'consistent with an association between acetaminophen exposure during pregnancy and increased incidence of neurodevelopmental disorders' and urges women to 'limit acetaminophen consumption to protect their offspring's neurodevelopment.' Critics caution about liver failure, saying Tylenol is 'the number one cause of liver failure in children in America' and noting dosing concerns. Studies cited include 'The role of oxidative stress, inflammation and acetaminophen exposure from birth to early childhood in the induction of autism' and 'maternal immune activation' (IL-6). The speakers link Tylenol to inflammation, vulnerability, and vaccines, framing it as a factor in a national conversation, including RFK Jr.'s involvement.

Speaker 0 reports that hundreds of women across the US and UK are banding together to sue Pfizer over the Depo Provera birth control injection, alleging a link to brain tumor development. The lawsuits reference a French study from the previous year showing that women who received the birth control injection and used Depo Provera for more than a year were five times more likely to develop a meningioma, a specific type of brain tumor. The study is said to be robust, noting that eighteen thousand women in the study between 2009 and 2018 underwent brain surgery specifically for meningioma. The speaker emphasizes the scope of Depo Provera’s use, stating that more than forty million women have already used the injectable birth control. A 2021 publication in the Journal of Family Medicine and Primary Care is cited, reporting that over forty-two million women were using injectable birth controls like Depo Provera. In the United States, this represents about twenty-five percent, or one quarter, of all sexually active women. The discussion places the current litigation in the context of earlier legal actions concerning hormonal birth control. The speaker notes that this is not the first class-action lawsuit about birth control companies not adequately warning users about potential health impacts. A 2014 settlement is recalled, where a pharmaceutical company agreed to a global settlement of $100,000,000 over NuvaRing-related issues, specifically blood clotting problems leading to deep vein thrombosis, stroke, or death. The speaker then shifts attention to other birth control options, pointing to Nexplanon, an implant placed in the arm, and remarks that videos or attention around Nexplanon suggest that a similar class action could be anticipated in the future. The overall sentiment conveyed is that there is growing public concern and scrutiny of hormonal birth control products and their health risks. Finally, the speaker notes that mainstream media and companies are questioning why women are quitting birth control, implying a broader trend of declining use in response to safety concerns and lawsuits.

The Ryman family, behind JAB Holdings, faced scrutiny for ties to Hitler and slave labor. Reckitt, linked to baby formula and cleaning product controversies, settled a $60 million lawsuit. They also faced legal action for inflating Suboxone prices. The company's acquisition of Kari and connections to population control raise questions. Stay tuned for part 3. Stay safe. Translation: The Ryman family, owners of JAB Holdings, were connected to Hitler and slave labor. Reckitt settled a $60 million lawsuit over baby formula and faced legal action for Suboxone pricing. Their purchase of Kari and ties to population control are concerning. Watch out for part 3. Stay safe.

In 1986, the National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act removed liability from drug companies for vaccine-related injuries. Recently, the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals ruled that the COVID vaccine is not a true vaccine as it doesn't prevent disease or transmission. This could open up legal challenges against pharmaceutical companies, though the government may protect them. The outcome remains uncertain.

The Kansas Attorney General is suing Pfizer for violating the Kansas Consumer Protection Act by making misleading claims about its COVID-19 vaccine. The suit alleges Pfizer misrepresented the vaccine's safety, particularly for pregnant women. While vaccine manufacturers have immunity from injury lawsuits, they aren't protected from liability for misrepresentation. The Attorney General claims Pfizer advertised the vaccine as safe for pregnant women despite knowing of risks. He states that Pfizer possessed information as early as February 2021 regarding complications, including miscarriages in over 10% of cases, yet still promoted the vaccine as safe for pregnant women. The lawsuit focuses on Pfizer allegedly misrepresenting their product.

Can I please tell you this huge news? This is huge, you guys. Right. Right. Pfizer purchased a rival company called Arena Pharmaceuticals for $6,700,000,000, and what they do is they have drug products that treat immuno inflammatory diseases from injury. So Pfizer, who's giving the injuries, are now gonna be the solution. It's the The Fox watching the head house. Like, come on. This is what is a problem reaction solution? But now they're in charge of it all. They're in control of it all. That is the summary of the news.

Simply Orange, owned by Coca Cola, is facing backlash for high levels of toxic forever chemicals found in their juice. These PFAS chemicals, used in nonstick pans, are 100 times above federal limits. Despite the brand's image, the juice contains harmful pesticides and synthetic vitamins. Coca Cola is being sued for misleading consumers about the product's safety. Let me know in the comments if you have consumed this contaminated juice.

Johnson & Johnson is voluntarily recalling Neutrogena and Aveeno sunscreens due to the presence of benzene. The CDC describes benzene as a colorless, odorless, highly flammable chemical used to make lubricants, rubbers, dyes, detergents, drugs, and pesticides. The American Cancer Society states benzene is known to cause cancer, specifically leukemia and other blood cancers. J&J's revenue is $81.6 billion, with $14 billion from consumer products like Neutrogena and Aveeno. Their growth is primarily led by their pharmaceutical business, specifically sales of IMBRUVICA, which treats leukemia.

A class action lawsuit has been filed against Lindt dark chocolate, alleging violations of consumer laws due to significant levels of lead and cadmium found in their products. The lawsuit claims Lindt has known about these issues since 2014. In court, Lindt argued that their advertising wasn’t false because they never explicitly stated their chocolate was free of these metals. However, the judge countered that reasonable consumers would expect a premium product to be free of toxic heavy metals. Lindt also claimed no one has proven harm from their chocolate, but the court stated that proof of injury isn’t necessary to declare a safety hazard. The class action is proceeding, seeking compensation for consumers who purchased the chocolate. Updates on any settlement will follow.

Speaker 1 discusses important findings from autism research that families should know when making decisions. The FDA will act on acetaminophen use during pregnancy, with the FDA responding to clinical and laboratory studies that suggest a potential association between acetaminophen used during pregnancy and adverse neurodevelopmental outcomes, including later diagnosis of ADHD and autism. Scientists have proposed biological mechanisms linking prenatal acetaminophen exposure to altered brain development, and the FDA has evaluated contrary studies that show no association. Today, the FDA will issue a physician’s notice about the risk of acetaminophen during pregnancy and begin the process to initiate a safety label change. HHS will launch a nationwide public service campaign to inform families and protect public health. The FDA recognizes that acetaminophen is often the only tool for fevers and pain in pregnancy, as other alternatives have well-documented adverse effects. HHS encourages clinicians to exercise their best judgment and use acetaminophen for fevers and pain in pregnancy by prescribing the lowest effective dose for the shortest necessary duration and only when treatment is required. Thanks to politicization of science, the safety of acetaminophen against the risk of neurodevelopmental disorders in young children has never been validated. Prudent medicine therefore suggests caution with acetaminophen use by young children, given that strong evidence also associates it with liver toxicity. Some studies have found that use of acetaminophen in children can potentially prolong viral illnesses. The FDA will drive new research to safeguard mothers, children, and families. In addition to a possible acetaminophen connection to autism for pregnant women, infants, and toddlers, the research has revealed that folate deficiency in a child’s brain can lead to autism. There are also other confirmation studies. One finding cited is that two studies show children who are circumcised early have double the rate of autism, highly likely because they’re given Tylenol. The speaker notes that none of this is positive, but it is information that should be paid attention to. Speaker 0 comments that there is a tremendous amount of proof or evidence, though he is not a doctor, and that he studied this a long time ago.

Johnson and Johnson knowingly sold baby powder with asbestos since the 1970s, leading to lawsuits. FDA recalls products for asbestos. Johnson and Johnson owns popular brands like Splenda, which contains harmful ingredients. FDA-approved Splenda linked to health risks. Top owners of Johnson and Johnson are Vanguard, State Street, and BlackRock, who also own major food brands. Research ownership of brands to uncover connections. Concerns about other harmful ingredients in products.

A Michigan judge ruled that a drug manufacturer and hospital are not protected by the Public Readiness and Emergency Preparedness Act in a case where a man experienced strokes and a leg amputation after receiving contaminated Remdesivir. This is the first time a judge has ruled against the protection provided by the PREP Act. The lawsuit alleges breach of warranty, negligence, and gross negligence. The patient received 5 doses of Remdesivir, 2 of which were from contaminated lots. He experienced strokes and was later diagnosed with bruises and swelling. The drug manufacturer, Gilead, issued a voluntary recall of the contaminated lots after receiving customer complaints. The patient and his family were not notified until 4 months later. This case highlights the devastating consequences of negligence and greed in the pharmaceutical industry.

Johnson & Johnson created a Texas subsidiary, Red River Talc, with no real business, primarily for bankruptcy purposes. This strategy aims to shield the company from liability related to cancer cases linked to their talc-based baby powder. Despite decades of trust in the product, evidence emerged showing contamination with asbestos, a known carcinogen. Legal battles have ensued, with thousands of women suing J&J for ovarian cancer. The company’s bankruptcy maneuvering could prevent victims from receiving fair compensation and strip their rights to a jury trial. Critics argue this sets a dangerous precedent for corporate accountability. Meanwhile, legislative efforts are underway to address these tactics, but concerns remain about J&J's lobbying influence. Victims like Mary Anne continue to seek justice, insisting the company must be held accountable.

- “Yesterday at the White House, a press conference was held regarding autism, and it was announced that there is a relationship, a causation between acetaminophen, most commonly known as brand name Tylenol, taken during pregnancy and autism.” - “acetaminophen is a over the counter product that is in many drugs that is very dangerous to take. Why? It depletes the body's glutathione.” - “Tylenol is the number one cause of accidental overdose and visits to the emergency department.” - “It is the leading cause of acute liver failure and the need for a liver transplant.” - “Originally owned by Johnson and Johnson, it was spun off several years ago to another company.” - “There are claims that there is no direct causation, only correlation.” - “Leukavarin.” - “Not giving newborns hepatitis B, that's a good start.” - “Uncoupling vaccines so as not to give combinations as the combination overwhelms the body's immune system.” - “Acetaminophen should be avoided during pregnancy, nonpregnancy, with children, with adults.”

Johnson and Johnson is described as the largest, costliest, and deadliest criminal conspiracy in American history, allegedly causing or contributing to the deaths of 2,000,000 Americans. Grand jury documents reportedly show Johnson and Johnson sales reps told psychiatrists not to worry about killing patients because they wouldn't get caught, and to hide their tracks by diagnosing patients with late-onset schizophrenia, which the speaker claims doesn't exist. Johnson and Johnson has purportedly spent $35 billion on lawyers and litigation since February 2011. Experts, when consulted off the record, warned about the company's powerful lawyers. The speaker contrasts Johnson and Johnson's "no more tears" baby commercials with what they claim is the company's reality.

Johnson and Johnson is recalling Neutrogena and Aveeno sunscreens due to the presence of benzene, a colorless and flammable chemical linked to cancer, particularly leukemia. Despite generating $81.6 billion in revenue, only $14 billion comes from consumer products, with the majority from pharmaceuticals and medical devices. Their pharmaceutical growth is driven by drugs like IMBRUVICA and DARZALEX, which are used to treat leukemia. This raises questions about the inclusion of a carcinogen in their sunscreens while profiting from cancer treatment medications.

Johnson & Johnson is recalling Neutrogena and Aveeno sunscreens due to cancer-causing benzene. Benzene is used in various products and is linked to leukemia. The company's revenue is mainly from pharmaceuticals like IMBRUVICA, which treats leukemia. This raises suspicion about why benzene was in their sunscreens.

Pfizer is being sued for defrauding the government, but they claim they did not commit fraud. They argue they provided what the government requested, even if it was a faulty product distributed worldwide. This information is crucial and not widely known.

Directly from the J and J website, they are doing a voluntary recall of Neutrogena and Aveeno sunscreen products due to the presence of benz According to the CDC, it is a chemical that is colorless, odorless, and highly flammable What does it use to make? Lubricants, rubbers, thighs, detergents, drugs, and pesticides And according to the American Cancer Society, benzene is known to cause cancer, specifically leukemia and other cancers of blood Well, if you look at their revenues, they have $81,600,000,000 in revenue, and only 14,000,000,000 of that is from consumer facing products like Neutrogena and Aveeno But the rest of all of this is from their pharmaceuticals and medical devices And apparently, their growth is primarily led by its pharmaceutical business, specifically their sales of IMBRUVKA and DARZALEX But what does IMBRUVKA do? You guessed it. Treats leukemia

According to a lawyer representing the FDA, doctors are now allowed to prescribe Ivermectin to treat COVID-19. This is a surprising development, as the FDA previously discouraged the use of Ivermectin for COVID-19. The case was brought by three doctors who claimed that the FDA unlawfully interfered with their medical practice by discouraging the use of Ivermectin. The FDA stated that Ivermectin is not authorized or approved to treat COVID-19. However, the doctors feel vindicated by this recent decision and are calling for accountability from the FDA. Stay tuned for more updates.

The attorney general announced an investigation into Kellogg's for advertising their product as healthy while using petroleum crude tar, which requires a warning label in Europe due to concerns that artificial food dyes harm children's brains. There are currently seven million children in the US diagnosed with ADHD. Kellogg's also uses the preservative BHT, which is linked to cancer and endocrine disruption. These ingredients have been removed from Kellogg's products sold in Europe, Canada, Australia, India, and Korea. The demand is for big food companies to serve the healthier versions already produced for other countries. The attorney general in Texas is holding one of the major food companies accountable, with the expectation that many other states will follow suit.