reSee.it - Related Video Feed

The speaker claims that the World Health Organization (WHO) is a criminal cartel. They point out that the WHO's founding document grants them exemption from criminal prosecution, which includes investigations into wrongdoing. The speaker questions why an organization would need such protection and suggests that it is because the WHO is aware that they are already breaking the law.

"I'm done talking about COVID, and I'm done talking about SARS CoV two." "For a hundred and ten years, we, the people of the world, have been lied to." "We're a group of very small number of criminal industrial conspirators decided to subordinate the entirety of the human population for the purpose of their sinister plans to enrich themselves while impoverishing and killing the rest of humanity." "When the words acceptable death rate become part of an industrial norm, we have lost the plot of humanity." "This is a criminal cartel." "since its formation in the nineteen forties, the World Health Organization has been nothing more than a criminal cartel that has a sole and singular intent." "This is not an allegation." "This is actually provable by their own words in their own hand." "And they use a four step process to execute every one of their nefarious plans."

A speaker accuses the World Health Organization (WHO) of being a criminal cartel with sinister plans to enrich themselves and harm humanity. They claim that the WHO has a four-step process to execute their nefarious plans, including planning exercises, funding, creating rationales, and deploying and profiting from them. The speaker also alleges that the WHO has committed crimes such as genocide, racketeering, and terrorism. They provide examples of unethical practices, including the murder of children in vaccine trials and the manipulation of the COVID-19 pandemic for profit. The speaker calls for the dismantling of the WHO and an end to their criminal activities.

The speaker criticizes the World Health Organization (WHO) for its lack of accountability and the immunity it grants to its affiliates. They argue that the WHO has granted itself extraterritorial and extrajudicial rights that no other institution would have. The speaker believes that no institution should have absolute immunity and highlights the potential for corruption and malfeasance. They claim that the COVID narrative was a premeditated, genocidal program carried out by racketeering co-conspirators who violated laws in the United States and Europe. The speaker specifically mentions the World Health Organization's Global Preparedness Monitoring Board as a violation of the Clayton Act in the US and a criminal collusion network.

The Gates Foundation was established after a settlement for antitrust crimes. It funds the World Health Organization along with other major foundations. The Global Preparedness Monitoring Board includes members from these foundations. The influence of Gates, Rockefeller, and others on the WHO raises concerns about independence. This situation violates Swiss law and echoes past eugenics agendas. The goal of reducing the global population through vaccinations has been openly discussed.

The World Health Organization (WHO) has been accused of being a criminal cartel that has manipulated public health for profit, leading to widespread harm. The speaker argues that the WHO's actions, including the handling of vaccines and the COVID-19 pandemic, reflect a long history of deceit and exploitation. They assert that the organization was founded with the intent to commit crimes, using tactics that prioritize profit over public health. The speaker emphasizes the need to recognize these actions as organized crime and calls for the dismantling of the WHO, rather than merely limiting its power. This is framed as a necessary step to address the alleged global terrorism and profiteering that has resulted from the WHO's operations.

The speaker expresses concerns about the World Health Organization (WHO) and its proposed pandemic treaty. They question the WHO's ability to learn from past mistakes and argue that giving the organization more power could lead to catastrophic errors. The speaker discusses the WHO's structure, funding, and influence, highlighting the role of external sources such as the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation. They criticize the WHO's reliance on private-public partnerships and claim that member states have limited input in decision-making. The speaker also raises concerns about the WHO's ability to define information and determine what is considered settled science. They emphasize the importance of considering the potential costs to democracy and individual freedoms.

The speaker says their role is to present context that, in their view, the past four years involved “orchestration to assault the liberties of people” by “pretending” the situation was a public health emergency while enabling “inconceivable threat to liberties” and “violation of human rights.” They frame this as “lip service to tyrants” and as “domestic and international terrorism.” They argue that evidence begins in the UK in 1966, saying the UK’s wealth and trust decided to fund “the coronavirus as the preferred form of human manipulation” in 1966. They then claim that one year later, the United States and the UK agreed to “modify and manipulate coronavirus” to see what could be done to infect a healthy population (described as 1967). They characterize “Operation Warp Speed” as arriving after 56 years. They cite an imaged 2011 document, described as stating “antitrust collusion” involving the Wellcome Trust, the Rockefeller Foundation, the Gates Foundation, NIAID, and the Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention. The speaker claims this group established a mandate that “by 2020, the world would accept… a universal vaccine” by the end of 2020, and they say the group identified coronavirus as the thing nature would need for the plan to happen. The speaker then quotes a 2015 public statement: “To sustain the funding base beyond the crisis, we needed to increase the public understanding of the need for medical countermeasures such as a pan influenza or pan coronavirus vaccine.” They say that at the time, the World Health Organization had officially declared coronavirus an eradicated disease, and they ask what world would need a vaccine for an eradicated disease. They argue that media hype drives economics: “A key driver is the media, and the economics will follow the hype,” and that “We need to use that hype to our advantage to get to the real issues.” They add that investors respond if they see profit, and characterize this as treason or terrorism. They say that Peter Daszak will testify in Congress in “a few short days” that the emergence likely came from a random event in Wuhan, China, where a bat and pangolin “got together and voila” by December, calling it “conspiracy level language.” The speaker asserts this is an admission of conspiracy “to commit acts of terror.” They also cite 2016 language, claiming an announcement that the Wuhan Institute of Virology Virus 1 was “poised for human emergence,” and treat this as part of the same “conspiracy.” Next, the speaker claims evidence includes a 2002 patent filed on “synthetic primary coronavirus,” which they say was “patented to be infectious and replication protective,” calling it “weaponized.” They further claim that in 2005, a curriculum vitae indicates “synthetic coronaviruses, biohacking, biological warfare enabling technologies,” and they question the meaning of that phrase, linking it to biological weapons. They state they have U.S. credentials since 2002 as a “biological weapons inspector” and say they briefed the matter since then. Finally, they cite a WHO Global Preparedness Monitoring Board announcement in September 2019, saying that between 09/19/2019 and September 2020 there would be “our greatest… accidental or intentional release of a respiratory pathogen,” emphasizing the word “release” as “not a leak” and suggesting no mention of accident likelihood.

A speaker accuses the World Health Organization (WHO) and pharmaceutical companies of being part of a criminal cartel that aims to enrich themselves while harming humanity. They claim that the WHO has a history of criminal behavior and provide evidence to support their claims. The speaker argues that the COVID-19 pandemic was planned and executed by these criminal organizations for profit and control. They highlight the funding, research, and manipulation of the virus as evidence of their criminal intent. The speaker calls for the dismantling of the WHO and condemns their actions as crimes against humanity.

A speaker accuses the World Health Organization (WHO) and pharmaceutical companies of being part of a criminal cartel that aims to enrich themselves while harming humanity. They claim that the WHO has a history of criminal behavior and provide evidence to support their claims. The speaker argues that the COVID-19 pandemic was not a public health crisis but a planned genocide orchestrated by the WHO and its collaborators. They highlight the funding, planning, creation, and profit from the pandemic as evidence of criminal activity. The speaker calls for the dismantling of the WHO and an end to their criminal actions.

The speaker claims that the World Health Organization (WHO) is a criminal cartel. They point out that the WHO's founding document grants them exemption from criminal prosecution, which raises questions about why an organization would need such protection. The speaker suggests that this exemption was included because the WHO knew they were already breaking the law.

A speaker accuses the World Health Organization (WHO) and pharmaceutical companies of being part of a criminal cartel with sinister plans to enrich themselves and harm humanity. They claim that the WHO has a history of criminal behavior and provide evidence to support their claims. The speaker argues that the COVID-19 pandemic was not a public health crisis but a deliberate act of genocide. They criticize the WHO's immunity from legal prosecution and highlight the financial ties between the organization and the Gates Foundation. The speaker also accuses the WHO and pharmaceutical companies of engaging in biological warfare and profiting from the pandemic. They call for the dismantling of the WHO.

The World Health Organization (WHO) is claimed to be a criminal racketeering organization violating the Sherman and Clayton Acts due to interlocking directorates, racketeering, market domination, and market controls. Since 1953, the WHO has allegedly been a vaccine-promoting enterprise benefiting those with commercial interests in vaccines. The Rockefeller Foundation and the Welcome Trust funded the WHO's establishment, allegedly not for information sharing, but to force drugs onto countries, including the dumping of drugs from Germany, the UK, and the US. While monitoring health conditions globally is important, the speaker argues that a financially disinterested party should make these determinations. The claim is that those with a financial incentive to declare a pandemic will collect data to justify their existence. The speaker asserts that the same group of people from the Eugenics office at Carnegie Mellon in 1913 established the World Health Organization in 1953 and are making these decisions.

In 2018, remdesivir was considered unethical for Ebola clinical trials in Africa due to a 53% kill rate, higher than Ebola's typical mortality. Despite this, it was chosen to treat COVID in April and May 2020, with Anthony Fauci and Deborah Burke advocating for its use despite the World Health Organization's ethical concerns. The speaker claims that a conflict of interest exists because the same entities that financially benefit from promoting certain products are declaring the pandemic. These entities are allegedly linked to the Eugenics office at Carnegie Mellon in 1913 and the establishment of the World Health Organization in 1953. The speaker expresses concern about the influence of eugenics on these decisions.

The speaker accuses the World Health Organization (WHO) and pharmaceutical companies of being part of a criminal cartel with sinister plans to enrich themselves and harm humanity. They claim that the WHO has a history of criminal activities and use a four-step process to execute their nefarious plans. The speaker also alleges that the COVID-19 pandemic was not a real health crisis but rather a genocide. They provide examples of unethical clinical trials and argue that the WHO has immunity from prosecution. Additionally, they criticize the Gates Foundation for exerting undue influence on the WHO through their donations. The speaker concludes by stating that the release of a biologically modified chimera was planned to sustain funding and profit.

In 2018, remdesivir was described as one of the speaker’s “favorite targets,” but it was said to have been considered too unethical for Ebola clinical trials in Africa because a “53% kill rate” was published in medical journals. The speaker contrasts this with the choice made in April and May 2020 to use remdesivir as the drug of choice to treat COVID, stating that the drug was still treated as unacceptable for African trials due to the alleged 53% kill rate. The speaker claims that Anthony Fauci and Deborah Birx were present next to the president advocating for remdesivir, while stating that the World Health Organization said it was unethical to use. The speaker frames the issue as a lack of accountability and justice as long as financial interests determine what product is promoted, arguing that if the entity declaring a pandemic is also driven by financial interests, there is no possibility for accountability. The speaker also alleges that the decision-makers were formed out of the Eugenics Office at Carnegie Mellon in 1913, and that the same group established the World Health Organization in 1953. The speaker asserts that this group was making the decision in 2020 regarding remdesivir and says they have a problem with eugenics.

Speaker 0 argues that the world has been lied to for 110 years by a small group of criminal industrial conspirators who aim to subjugate humanity to enrich themselves, impoverish and kill others, and that the words “acceptable death rate” have become an industrial norm. They claim this is not just a political disagreement but a crime, asserting that the World Health Organization (WHO) and pharmaceutical companies authorized to begin the process of killing human beings in the interest of advancing their goals. The speaker declares this is a criminal cartel and states they will show documents proving it, insisting this is not an allegation but something that is provable by their own words. The four-step process alleged for executing nefarious plans is: 1) they begin by planning an exercise, 2) they fund that exercise, 3) they create the rationale for what they will do, and 4) they deploy and profit from it. They claim this violates 15 U.S. code section 19 (and connect it to the Clayton Act and the early formation of WHO in 1947), and they claim violation of the TFEU (the treaty for the functioning of the European Union), asserting Article 101 sets out that this was never public health but racketeering to instill terror to adapt population behavior. Data from Zurich is used to argue there was no pandemic: the speaker notes that during the death pandemic of the globe, life insurance claims fell by $30,000,000,000, stating that the data is unambiguous and that there was genocide rather than a pandemic. They pivot to the 2011 WHO, Welcome Trust, PATH, and Gates Foundation malaria vaccine program for children under six months, highlighting that 66 children in the vaccine group were murdered and 28 in the control group were murdered, with the control described as a cocktail of pathogenic injections rather than saline. The speaker references Article five, section 13, claiming immunity from arrest or legal process was designed as permanent immunity for a criminal organization formed in 1947; they connect the first WHO director general, Renee Sand (sic) from the Dachau-era milieu, to Brock Chisholm, who allegedly advocated population control as a primary objective. The claim extends to funding and influence: Gates Foundation allegedly provides 88% of WHO’s foundation donations, which the speaker says constitutes a tax and competition law violation in Europe and the United States. The four-step process is illustrated again with sourcing: to sustain funding beyond the crisis, to increase public understanding for medical countermeasures like pan-influenza or pan-coronavirus vaccines, and to use media hype to attract investors who see profit at the end of the process, as documented by the Global Preparedness Monitoring Board and Peter Daszak’s partnerships. The 2014 Rand Paul–Anthony Fauci correspondence is cited, showing a letter from NIAID to UNC Chapel Hill stating that gain-of-function research would continue during a moratorium with a budget funded by DARPA and NIH. The speaker quotes that the Wuhan virus was anticipated, citing a 2016 publication stating SARS-like Wuhan Institute of Virology virus one is poised for human emergence, implying foreknowledge and manipulation of the virus in Wuhan and UNC Chapel Hill. The talk shifts to the characterization of the work as biological warfare enabling technologies, referencing Ralph Baric’s 2005 DARPA/MITRE presentation and subsequent NIAID and DARPA funding, concluding that the project was to produce biological warfare enabling technologies rather than public health measures. They highlight substantial profits for Pfizer and Moderna from public funds and accuse the WHO of laundering money via a budget expansion request of 11%. In closing, the speaker maintains this is not a public health crime or constitutional crime, but a criminal conspiracy of criminal racketeers. They call for ending the criminal organization itself and urge everyone to destroy the WHO.

A small group of conspirators has manipulated global health organizations for profit, leading to widespread harm. The World Health Organization (WHO) has operated as a criminal cartel since its inception, prioritizing control and profit over public health. They employ a four-step process: planning, funding, creating rationale, and profiting from their actions. Evidence suggests that the WHO and its partners have engaged in unethical practices, including harmful vaccine trials. The funding structure, heavily reliant on the Gates Foundation, raises legal concerns. The narrative surrounding pandemics has been manipulated to instill fear and drive acceptance of vaccines. This situation is characterized as organized crime, requiring a reevaluation of the WHO's role and a call for its dismantlement rather than mere reform. The focus should be on addressing the criminal actions rather than debating public health measures.

The Gates Foundation was formed after Microsoft's antitrust violations settlement. It funneled money to the World Health Organization, influencing its actions. The Global Preparedness Monitoring Board was created with members from Gates Foundation, NIAID, and others. The WHO's funding is mostly from Gates, giving them control. This violates Swiss law. The agenda includes population control, with statements about reducing the global population through vaccinations.

We are the top funder, but Bill Gates is also a big funder of the World Health Organization. Bill Gates and the Communist Chinese Party have significant influence, overshadowing the United States. A small group of elites, including Bill Gates, could pass a global pandemic treaty and make amendments without needing approval from all member nations. This power grab is unprecedented in human history and will drastically impact our future if not stopped. Pay attention and take action before it's too late.

A speaker accuses the World Health Organization (WHO) and pharmaceutical companies of being part of a criminal cartel that aims to enrich themselves while harming humanity. They claim that the WHO has a history of criminal behavior and uses a four-step process to execute their plans. The speaker also alleges that the COVID-19 pandemic was not a real health crisis, but rather a genocide orchestrated by the WHO. They provide evidence of unethical practices, including the murder of children in vaccine trials. The speaker argues that the WHO and pharmaceutical companies have engaged in racketeering, money laundering, and biological warfare. They call for the dismantling of the WHO.

The transcript presents a wide-ranging, critical portrait of Bill Gates, intertwining biographical claims with controversial allegations about Microsoft and the Gates Foundation, as well as broader conspiracy-like scenarios. Key biographical and career points: - The narrative asserts Gates did not rise from a garage origin but was born into wealth and privilege; both his grandfather and great-grandfather were banking moguls, and his father, William Gates Sr., was a Seattle-based lawyer and political lobbyist who taught him about law, politics, and manipulation of governing power. - Gates is introduced as chairman of Microsoft. He dropped out of college to start Microsoft and is credited with inventing the Windows operating system, though the transcript states he “played no part in the invention of Windows,” instead purchasing an existing operating system from Seattle Computer Products, having it modified, and licensing it to IBM, while taking credit. - Paul Allen is described as co-founder who, while battling cancer, was targeted by Gates in an attempt to dilute Allen’s share of the company. - Gates’s business strategies are said to have been challenged by a 1998 U.S. Department of Justice antitrust lawsuit against Microsoft; a lengthy deposition is summarized with questions about non-Microsoft browsers and Gates’s responses. - A deposition clip emphasizes tensions over Gates’s concerns about competition. Philanthropy and public image: - To counter negative press, Gates invested $100 million to establish the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, allegedly transforming his image from monopolistic tycoon to generous philanthropist; the rebranding allegedly led to Gates being crowned the richest man in the world as his net worth doubled. - The Foundation is described as a massive vertically integrated entity spanning a supply chain from Seattle to Africa and Asia; Gates is depicted as a top donor to WHO and the CDC, wielding immense influence over global health and medical policy. - The Foundation’s vaccine initiatives are highlighted: Gates allegedly invested billions in vaccines, with a Wall Street Journal essay claiming vaccines are “the best investment I’ve ever made” and noting a reported over 20-to-1 return on investment. Controversies and criticisms: - The Foundation is accused of causing harm through “experimental vaccine programs,” with claims that it has investments in numerous polluting companies and that some portfolio companies have been accused of evictions, child labor, patient neglect, or fraud; details are not provided. - Specific vaccine-related controversies include controversial HPV vaccination campaigns in India (2009), where tribal girls purportedly received vaccines without proper informed consent, resulting in injuries and deaths; Parliament and authorities allegedly investigated and removed the Gates Foundation from involvement. - Allegations are raised about the ethics and safety of vaccines, including claims of paralysis from the oral polio vaccine and criticism of media and political manipulation surrounding vaccination campaigns. - The transcript mentions a broader pattern of distrust: “the Gates Foundation denied that it had been clinical trials,” and it describes media manipulation and political power associated with vaccination campaigns. Other asserted initiatives and associations: - Alleged participation in controversial projects such as the Stratospheric Controlled Perturbation Experiment (to block sunlight) and Earth Now’s global surveillance program; claims of a vaccine certificate system with MIT to implant quantum dot tattoos for digital immunity proof. - The EPA’s approval of an Oxitec project to release genetically modified mosquitoes to combat malaria is mentioned, with NIH noting plans for immunization via mosquito bites. - The transcript also references a New York Times report about Gates’s connections to Jeffrey Epstein, including meetings and flights on Epstein’s plane, and a debate over why a charitable trust would partner with Epstein. Overall, the transcript compiles a narrative that casts Gates as dual: a powerful, influential benefactor and a controversial figure implicated in ethical, health, and geopolitical criticisms, culminating in questions about his motives and the breadth of his influence.

In 02/2015, Bill Gates stated the world population needs to be reduced by 10 to 15% due to global warming, and this would be achieved through vaccines. In 02/2020, Gates said 7 billion people must be vaccinated. The speaker then poses the question of why they should take a vaccine for their health that is financed and produced by someone who wants to decrease the world population.

Speaker 0: It is a report that concludes that The United States official foreign policy signed into law in 1975 by president Ford, and when I say signed into law, it's called a presidential directive, is the reduction of population in 12 foreign twelve twelve specific foreign countries. Not the control of population, the reduction of population. And so it explains the ways we're gonna do this is through medicalizing birth control, never was before. You didn't need a doctor to get a condom, and to go around and talk to villages everywhere and say, you want a reproductive health freedom, don't you? You know what most women want on the planet Earth? Babies. They're they're not looking for reproductive health freedom was a term for have fewer babies. Right? There is a very potent move in official US foreign policy to reduce population in other countries. Now why? Philippines or or Indonesia. Why? They state it directly in the Kissinger report because it's classified. They wanted to reduce those countries' development so that they wouldn't need their own raw materials because we want them, the metals, etcetera. It is dark as shit, the Kissinger reports. It's not and it's not classified anymore. You can, you know, ask chat GPT about it to give you quotes from it. And so this whole business of population reduction is now another third rail I'm stepping on. Right? Nobody wants it. What are you you're nuts. No. A lot of people want it. A lot of people believe, obviously, Bill Gates, that 8,000,000,000 people was the number where we must turn it around, which is where we are supposedly now. And the Kissinger report, I was a kid. I didn't write it. I didn't make it up. You can find it on Wikipedia. It's a real thing. And all the presidential directives that came from it. Would these countries like the idea that we show up and we say, hey. We've got a new tetanus vaccine for you, but it happens to also have in it secretly something that will reduce fertility in your women as we did in India, as we did in Peru. In both India and Peru, we also did forced sterilization surgeries. US paid for them. True story. Speaker 1: So the the one vaccine was the DTP vaccine. Is that what it was? Speaker 0: The the one I'm talking about. The the Speaker 1: the The one that had h c g in it? It was just tetanus. But there was a vaccine that was in Bobby Kennedy's book Yeah. Where they were talking about women in Africa, where they were unknowingly given Yeah. This vaccine against That's that's diphtheria, tetanus, and Speaker 0: Well, it was the tetanus part Right. That that they were that they were pitching. And by the way, tetanus is a challenge in those countries more than it is in The United States. But, yeah, they were call they were naming them wellness drugs. Speaker 1: And they had h c g Speaker 0: in it. That's correct. Speaker 1: And that h c g, and they were more administered to women than they were to men. Speaker 0: Oh, of course. And they were five. They would administer administer five of the injections. Speaker 1: And they did it under this the guys were the the the narrative was that women were more vulnerable. So you have to give the vaccination to women. Yeah. And it was preventing them from getting pregnant. Speaker 0: It was preventing them from getting pregnant, and they had World Health Organization, which basically has this as a mission. Man, I wish they would sue me for saying this, but they they have this as a mission, which is population reduction from the beginning. They had worked on that HCG. Speaker 1: There's Gates famously, Speaker 0: of course, Speaker 1: in the speech saying Speaker 0: We can do that with vaccines. Speaker 0: Yeah. By the way, in the Kissinger report, for those of you not seeing this and only hearing it, that was me drinking my pause was me drinking water. I did not have a stroke. In the Kissinger report, they list the strategies and how much funding they'll give to each strategy. One of the strategies is to medicalize birth control, meaning have trusted people in the villages, etcetera. Another one is to pay young men to have a vasectomy. Just outright pay you know, write a check-in villages so they get $60 and they get a nice weekend of buying beer, but they never have kids. But another one of them is injections that reduce that temporarily reduce male fertility. Now here's an interesting thing about that one. It's in the Kissinger report. Injections that temporarily reduce male fertility. The COVID vaccine reduces sperm count in men for three months admitted by Fauci. It's not a secret. But the CDC's response was, yeah, but it's only for three months. And But they were asking us to take one every fucking three months. Well, also the miscarriages. Miscarriages and stillbirths. My point is that it's no it's no surprise that these persistent thoughts that I think good people believe meaning, I think there are good people who believe that population reduction is important. The fact is, of course, that now we are barely at replacement, you know, at replacement value right now in terms of many populations.

The speaker claims the WHO is a criminal cartel, pointing to its founding document, which grants the organization exemption from all criminal prosecution. This exemption, according to the speaker, extends to anyone operating under the WHO's auspices, shielding them from investigations into misdeeds and misbehavior. The speaker questions why an organization would require such broad criminal immunity in its founding charter. The speaker asserts the WHO included this clause because it was already breaking the law at the time of its inception.