TruthArchive.ai - Related Video Feed

In my 30 years as a prosecutor, judge, and DA, I have never seen a witness torn apart like Michael Cohen. He lies constantly, including to congress, judges, and in court. Cohen claimed to have resolved an issue with Trump in 2016, but evidence showed otherwise. This case is a circus led by a liar. A judge should dismiss it before going to a jury.

The speaker points out that the prosecutor in the case has intertwined her political interests with the case, which could backfire. The prosecutor has been removed from part of the case due to a conflict of interest and has made inappropriate public statements. The speaker believes this is bad form for a prosecutor and could be a problem when the case goes to court. They predict that Donald Trump will argue that the prosecutor has improperly mixed politics with the case and should be removed. The speaker acknowledges that these arguments may not succeed, but the prosecutor has created problems for herself.

It's abnormal for a presidential candidate to have to defend himself in court during his campaign. In all seven cases, there's no doubt he committed the acts. We're waiting to see if justice will be served in time. The media is treating it like any other political story, downplaying its seriousness.

Svetlana Lekova, described as an encyclopedia on accountability, has spent about ten years studying the subject and working with the Durham investigation. She says she has read every document, every note in every annex, including documents that were declassified by President Trump, then reclassified by Joe Biden after he “stole the election,” and then declassified again by Trump when he came into office. She rejects the claim that President Trump gave her classified documents. Despite ongoing accusations, she notes that they have not stopped pursuing her and she has not stopped fighting. Lekova requests the audience to consider the Florida case she views as significant and to explain what it is about. She asserts that accountability is finally, hopefully, happening, but she remains cautious because of what she has seen in other high-profile cases, such as Jim Comey, where she believes the judiciary, juries, and prosecutors have been compromised. After ten years of involvement with the Durham investigation, she had been told there would be prosecutions. She recalls that prosecutors had Hillary Clinton under oath and John Brennan under oath, and that it was a criminal investigation. Then, according to her, it “disappeared,” and nothing happened. Lekova describes a sequence where authorities raided the president’s home, and he was “almost assassinated,” with attempts to jail him. She says the result appeared to be that not only would the “bad guys” not go to jail, but the “good guy” trying to bring them to account would end up jailed for the rest of his life, at least in their perception of the situation. She notes that President Trump, through what she calls “amazing” grace, managed to come back and that “you guys somehow managed to vote him in” in such large numbers that there was no alternative for the election. She asserts that the first thing he did upon returning was to promise accountability. Speaker 0 clarifies the context by noting that the Florida case is “so significant” and asks Lekova to describe what it is really about. Speaker 1 reiterates that accountability is being pursued, acknowledging historical concerns about the judicial system, including the perception of brainwashed juries and corrupt prosecutors, and explains that, after a long period of inertia in the justice process, President Trump’s reelection framed the possibility of accountability and that he, as president, has the responsibility to hold the bad guys accountable because he is the chief law enforcement officer of the United States.

There is a trial to remove my name from the ballot. I believe the 2024 election is crucial because our country is being destroyed by people who may hate it. If they succeed in removing my name, there will never be a free election in America again. We are at risk of becoming a dictatorship where the president is chosen for us. This is our final chance to save America. The 2024 election is less than a year away, and it's an opportunity to stand against tyrants and make America great again. Winning is essential for our country's survival and to make it greater than ever before.

This is a disgraceful situation in a courtroom, with biased prosecutors and a judge with conflicts of interest. Every American must reject the politicization of justice and demand a fair legal system. We must unite against injustice, regardless of political beliefs, and ensure that everyone, including the President, receives equal treatment under the law. The American people hold the power to make a difference in November by standing up against this corruption.

A second assassination attempt occurred in Florida against President Donald Trump, surprising many due to its proximity to a previous incident. This raised demands for a transparent investigation. As Florida's attorney general, I was involved in pursuing this investigation, but faced significant obstacles from federal law enforcement, particularly the FBI. They restricted access to the crime scene, withheld evidence, and suggested that our investigation would violate the law, despite the serious implications of the attempt, including the near-death of a six-year-old girl. Frustrated by these challenges, I had to sue the DOJ and Merrick Garland to assert our right to investigate and prosecute the matter under our state laws.

The speaker highlights a unique situation where an attorney general is instructed to use the justice department and the FBI to file a lawsuit against a presidential candidate. The candidate in question is not only leading the Republicans by a significant margin but also holds a substantial lead over the Democratic candidate.

I was advised early in my political career to avoid discussing the forensic audit, the 2020 election, distancing myself from Trump, and questioning COVID vaccines or mandates. I disregarded that advice, visited the forensic audit site, and began addressing election corruption. Now, more evidence is emerging daily, and people are starting to catch up with these issues.

In 2016, I served as CFO for Hillary Clinton's campaign. Chairman Gensler, your enforcement director, Gerber Grewal, was the New Jersey attorney general who refused to enforce immigration laws and investigated Donald Trump multiple times. Your general counsel, Megan Barbero, litigated impeachment hearings against Trump, and one of your senior counsels is married to Peter Strzok. This raises concerns about impartiality at the SEC. The SEC's first enforcement action against SPACs was in September 2021, shortly after Senator Warren urged an investigation into Trump's Truth Social merger. It appears the SEC may be using its powers to target political rivals. Have you spoken to anyone at the White House regarding this investigation? I doubt I can change your mind about the political nature of these actions, but remember, power can shift, and such tactics may backfire. Thank you.

This is a continuation of what I believe is the greatest witch hunt of all time. The judge in this case has ruled that my properties are worth much less than they actually are. The attorney general who brought these charges against me is a racist and a failure. She used this case to try to get me before she even knew anything about me. My financial statements are actually better than what was reported. The banks were not affected and were paid back on time. There was no crime committed. This is all an attempt to damage me in the election. Our country is in serious decline and I'm running to fix it. Thank you.

There is a trial to remove my name from the ballot. I believe the 2024 election is crucial because our country is being destroyed by people who may hate it. If they succeed in removing my name, there will never be a free election in America again. We are at risk of becoming a dictatorship. The 2024 election is our last chance to save America. We must win to make America greater than ever before.

We've faced years of politically motivated attacks from the New York Attorney General, who campaigned on targeting me. Despite millions of pages of documents and extensive litigation, they lack evidence against us. The only witness they have is a convicted felon who has recanted his statements. We've already won in the Court of Appeals, but the judge has been slow to acknowledge that. This case is unprecedented, using a consumer fraud statute inappropriately, and feels like a witch hunt and election interference. Despite these challenges, our poll numbers are strong, and the American people understand the situation. Thank you for your support.

I'm here instead of campaigning due to a court case. The prosecution has no evidence of a crime, and experts believe the case should be dismissed. The trial is seen as an attack on Biden and a political move. The justice system is being questioned, and the judge is criticized for bias. Many feel it's a miscarriage of justice and a disgrace to the court system. The trial is viewed as corrupt and unfair. Thank you. Translation: The speaker is not campaigning due to a court case where the prosecution lacks evidence of a crime. Experts suggest dismissing the case. The trial is seen as a political attack on Biden, questioning the justice system and criticizing the biased judge. Many view it as unjust and a disgrace to the court system. The trial is perceived as corrupt and unfair. Thank you.

I've put an end to the weaponization of government. A prime example of this was when a sitting president was allowed to viciously prosecute a political opponent, like myself. But how did that turn out? Not too good. Not too good at all.

The attorney general found no fraud or accounting fraud in this case. The speaker believes this is a political witch hunt orchestrated by the White House to influence the election. They claim that the judge and attorney general manipulated the values of properties like Mar-a-Lago and Doral to deceive the court. The speaker argues that the case should be ended and criticizes the judge for not acknowledging a higher court's rebuke. They believe this is a weaponization of justice and election interference. The speaker expresses frustration at being in court instead of campaigning in Iowa, despite leading by a large margin.

In my twenty-plus years of practicing law, including my time as chief of the Financial Crimes of Public Corruption Unit, I've never encountered anything like this conversation with the prosecutor. A red line was definitely crossed. Essentially, the threats were, "admit wrongdoing, or we'll pursue a felony charge on a technicality, win or lose." That's disturbing, it's wielding the law as a weapon, not a search for truth. This case felt like a runaway freight train, the prosecutor is dead set on bringing this case against Dr. Hine.

Regardless of your opinion on Donald Trump, he's not the only one facing trials. Many in Miami are scared of courts being used against political foes. Trump's on trial now, but if we don't stop this cycle, it could be you next.

I am running a successful campaign for president and leading in every poll against a corrupt president. However, I am facing numerous non-meritorious lawsuits from my political opponents, which is unfair. Joe Biden and his supporters are interfering in the election, despite his inability to campaign effectively. The Wall Street Journal even warned that indicting me, along with these lawsuits, could have unintended consequences and should have been left for the voters to decide. This is another example of a potentially rigged election, which we must prevent.

The trial outcome was as expected, with the judge ruling against us consistently. His background leans heavily left, despite being appointed by Trump due to a political deal. This feels like punishment for exposing Joe Biden's long history of wrongdoing. I produced the laptop evidence for the New York Post, but that seems forgotten. My past includes significant prosecutions of organized crime and corruption, yet now the focus is on targeting Republicans. The upcoming judge has a reputation for harsh sentencing, and I never had a fair trial. Financially, I'm struggling; I have no cash or access to funds. This situation reflects the broader persecution of Trump and his associates.

This situation with the DOJ is unprecedented. My husband was a federal prosecutor for 30 years, and this level of interference is not how our justice system is supposed to work. The allegations are serious, but I can't have a knee-jerk, politically motivated reaction. I need to do what's smart and right. I'm consulting with other leaders in government to determine my responsibility. When the allegations came out in September, I interceded to help stabilize the city. I don't want this situation to derail our progress. As governor, I represent the city and must protect my constituents. I need time to process this and figure out the right approach. Of course I am consulting with advisors on this matter.

The judge set to bring Donald Trump to court on January 10th has ties to the Democratic Party, having donated personally and having a daughter who campaigned with Kamala Harris, earning significant money from it. Additionally, his wife worked as a special assistant to Letitia James, the New York attorney pursuing Trump. New York is the only state that hasn't dropped charges against Trump. The connections raise serious concerns about corruption in this case. This situation demands investigation.

The former president is being accused of converting a misdemeanor into a felony by the borough district attorney. However, two previous prosecutorial agencies have already examined the case and found nothing. This attack on the former president seems baseless and exaggerated, especially considering my experience as a prosecutor and defense attorney. It appears to be an over-the-top move.

A prosecutor should begin with a crime and then seek a name, not the other way around. The issue over the past four years has been the targeting of Donald Trump, starting from his 2016 campaign, leading to numerous investigations against him. As attorney general, I will not politicize the office or target individuals based on political affiliation. Justice will be applied fairly across the country. We need to unite and move forward; otherwise, we risk losing our country.

Nobody is above the law, and elected office does not grant immunity from prosecution. Defending a judge or prosecutor politically is inappropriate because the legal system should be nonpolitical. The speaker expresses dismay that someone had a judge arrested.