reSee.it - Related Video Feed

Adam Schiff is described as dishonest with a disproportionately large head and small neck. Schiff led a "fake witch hunt" regarding Russia, a story that was made up. This Russia narrative was used as an excuse for Hillary Clinton's loss, despite large crowds gathering. Schiff would leak information from secret intelligence hearings, holding news conferences to discuss the speaker and his family. Schiff knows the Russia story is a hoax he made up with Hillary Clinton, yet he claimed Donald Trump Jr. could go to prison for Russia-related activities. The speaker's son denied any involvement with Russia. The speaker characterizes these actions as traumatic for his family, calling those involved "bad people" and "sick degenerates."

I met with Putin before or after becoming president, and we discussed NATO potentially fracturing. He seemed excited about the idea of causing problems for NATO.

The entire world witnessed president Trump cower in the presence of Putin. President Trump obviously seemed frightened the presence of Putin. What was he afraid of?

President Trump is being questioned about race, but he deflects by bringing up allegations against him being a Russian plant. He dismisses these claims, stating that multiple former heads of the CIA and both parties have called it garbage. Trump sarcastically refers to the laptop controversy as another "Russia, Russia, Russia" hoax. The conversation then returns to the issue of race, and Trump expresses disbelief at the topic.

What if Russia breaks the ceasefire or peace talks? What do we do then? Okay, what if they broke it? I don't know. They broke it with Biden because they didn't respect him, or Obama. They respect me.

Okay, so what happens if Russia breaks the ceasefire or these talks? It's a valid question to ask. What if a bomb drops on your head right now? What if they broke the agreement? With Biden and Obama, they didn't respect them, but they respect me.

I know Putin well, and we had a remarkably good, blunt relationship. I'd describe it as brutally blunt. While never physical, I believe in being brutally honest with people in private. It's also important to avoid embarrassing them publicly if you want their cooperation. In my experience, most leaders appreciated my honesty about our interests and objectives. They also valued discretion when possible. Putin, specifically, never reneged on a personal agreement he made with me. Behind closed doors, he kept his word and could be trusted.

I can be tougher than anyone, but that's not how you make deals. We had a president who talked tough about Putin, but Putin still invaded Ukraine. Diplomacy is the path to peace and prosperity. America is a good country when it engages in diplomacy, like President Trump is doing. Putin occupied parts of Ukraine, including Crimea, back in 2014. Obama was president then, followed by Trump, then Biden, and now potentially Trump again. Nobody stopped Putin back then. People were dying on the contact line. I even signed a ceasefire deal with him in 2019, along with Macron and Merkel, but he broke it, killed our people, and didn't exchange prisoners.

They accuse us of what they're doing. These intelligence officials, the same ones who misled America, are worried about a second Trump term? They helped bury the Hunter Biden laptop story before the 2020 election. That laptop could have changed history. Now they claim Trump will weaponize the spy services. If Trump wins, I want them investigated for election interference. Joe Biden should be the first target. We need to expose them to the same rules they impose on us. They stole the election, and we can't just move on. They hid the laptop information. The deep state is real—media members, intelligence community members, both active and retired, and government bureaucrats. The deep state sabotaged the Trump administration before, and they're still here.

I found it interesting that Putin didn't criticize Joe Biden or NATO during our conversation. As an American, it would feel strange to badmouth the American president to a foreign leader, even if I have doubts about Biden's presidency. It just doesn't sit right with me. Maybe I'm just old-fashioned.

Voters, not Vladimir Putin, should decide who the American president is. The Russians offered, the campaign accepted, and the president used Russian help. The dossier alleges collusion and assistance. Vladimir Putin doesn't want one of the speakers to be president. Russia, China, and Iran have been involved in the election. Seventeen intelligence agencies have confirmed this. Fifty security officials who served in Republican administrations have said that Donald is unfit to be the commander in chief. The smear on Joe Biden comes from the Kremlin. The president is unwilling to confront Putin, even when Russia puts bounties on the heads of American soldiers in Afghanistan. There are several factors that contributed to the low to moderate confidence in the judgment.

"There is irrefutable evidence that detail how president Obama and his national security team directed the creation of an intelligence community assessment that they knew was false." "They knew it would promote this contrived narrative that Russia interfered in the twenty sixteen election to help president Trump win, selling it to the American people as though it were true." "There were four key elements from the assessment that were repeated over and over again and form the basis of the Russia hoax and the Robert Mueller witch hunt." "One, that Vladimir Putin wanted Donald Trump to win. Two, Putin took action to help Trump win. Three, the Russians had blackmail on Trump." "That the Russians tried colluding with the Trump campaign." "Senior CIA officials repeatedly refused to traffic in these allegations, but they were repeatedly overruled by CIA director Brennan and FBI director Comey." "60% of Democrats believed the Russians hacked our voting machines to help Trump win the White House." "Barack Obama did exactly what Putin wanted, undermined Americans' faith in free and fair elections and caused chaos in our country." "It's time for people to pay the price."

The war right now happening between Russia, Ukraine, and the West support of it actually was an extension of Russiagate. "Russiagate desensitized the Democrat party to hate Russia." The Russia narrative "came ex nihilo." "Putin became an acceptable villain for the Democrat party." "That all goes back to Russiagate." Our intel services are actually more about picking winners and losers in American elections and to thwart the will of pop sovereignty. "Obama personally ordered an intel report"—"Russia behind this election?" The report said no. "Russia was not behind this election, did not manipulate votes." FBI and CIA seem to be working on the same page. "The insurance policy" and "Dossier paid for by the Democrat party with Clinton funds to then illegally be able to spy on the Trump campaign." Rod Rosenstein was running the entire DOJ. This is the fourth branch of government—"unelected, unaccountable."

Said, your election was rigged because you have mail in voting. He said mail in voting every election. He said no country has mail in voting. It's impossible to have mail in voting and have honest elections. You won that election by so much. If you would have won, we wouldn't have had a war. You'd have all these millions of people alive now instead of dead. And you lost it because of mail in voting. The conclusion was you can't have mail in voting. We have mail in voting. They send out, like, 38,000,000 ballots. Some people get five, six, seven. But Vladimir Putin, smart guy, said you can't have an honest election with mail in voting. There's not a country in the world that uses it now. I would love to see election reform.

What's going to happen regarding Russia, Ukraine, China, and other countries? If this is true, then you're a corrupt politician. They're calling you corrupt. I want to focus on race. You have to respond to that. There are 50 former national intelligence officials who say what you're accusing me of is a Russian plant. This is backed by former heads of the CIA from both parties. Nobody believes it except for you and Rudy Giuliani. Is the laptop another Russia hoax? This is where you're going, the last stop is Russia. I want to stay on the issue of race. You have to be kidding. Here we go again with Russia. We're going to continue on the issue of race, Mr. President.

News alert discusses Tulsi Gabbard releasing a report alleging a conspiracy by a sitting president, Barack Obama, and U.S. intel agencies to undermine Donald Trump’s presidency and the 2016 election. The report claims there is irrefutable evidence that Obama and his national security team directed the creation of an intelligence community assessment they knew was false, promoting a narrative that Russia interfered in 2016 to help Trump win. Gabbard says she obtained a House Intelligence Committee report that had been locked away in a CIA vault for nearly a decade, and investigators spent over two thousand hours interviewing 20 CIA and FBI officials. The assertion is that the Obama administration doctored intelligence to imply Putin and Trump colluded to steal the election, with a highly unusual, rush-developed assessment produced a month after Trump’s victory. John Brennan allegedly handpicked five CIA analysts to write the assessment, who were siloed and not aware of each other’s work, with only one analyst in charge of drafting. The process was described as a rush job with no coordination with other intelligence agencies, essentially “home cooking” for Obama. The four key elements repeated in the assessment, forming the basis of the Russia hoax and the Mueller investigation, are: 1) that Vladimir Putin wanted Trump to win; 2) Putin took actions to help Trump win; 3) the Russians had blackmail on Trump (the Steele dossier); and 4) that the Russians tried colluding with the Trump campaign. The claim is that none of these were true, and there was no reliable intelligence to support them. Senior CIA officials allegedly refused to propagate these allegations, but were overruled by CIA Director Brennan and FBI Director Comey, who pressed for them despite lacking verifiable evidence. The report alleges the Obama administration cherry-picked intelligence, misquoted sources, did not corroborate claims, suppressed counter-evidence, and even used anonymous internet postings. Rank-and-file CIA personnel allegedly admitted that these actions violated tradecraft standards, with a pressure campaign emanating from political appointees, the CIA director, and Obama himself. Speaker 1 asserts that Donald Trump knows Russia helped him win in 2016. Speaker 2 suggests Putin’s preference for Trump came from his dislike of Hillary Clinton, who was running, while Speaker 3 states Russia sought to interfere systematically to advance Trump’s prospects. The conversation notes that at one point, 60% of Democrats believed Russia hacked voting machines to aid Trump, yet the report contends Russians aimed to create chaos and undermine faith in democracy, with solid intelligence indicating Putin had no clear preference between Clinton and Trump but had dirt on Clinton that was not released. The discussion questions why the dirt from the DNC emails and claims about Clinton’s health, including tranquilizers, were not leaked to aid Trump, and whether the information about Clinton’s health is credible. The panel suggests that if Russia sought to influence the election, more damning information would have been released. The speakers claim Obama and top intelligence leaders mischaracterized intelligence and relied on dubious sources to craft a narrative of Putin’s preference for Trump. They contend Obama continued pushing the hoax after the election, describing it as undermining democracy. Towards the end, there is mention of potential criminal implications, with references to referrals to the Department of Justice and FBI for investigation, including possible liability for Obama. A tester voices that Brennan may have committed perjury before Congress. A final note asserts that the CIA did not rely on the Steele dossier for the intelligence community assessment, countering a claim made in the discussion. The segment closes with a call for accountability.

Voters in America should decide the president, not Vladimir Putin. The Russians offered, the campaign accepted, and the president used their help. The allegation is that they colluded. Putin doesn't want me to be president. Russia, China, and Iran have been involved in this election. 17 intelligence agencies confirmed it. Fifty former national security officials said Trump is unfit to be commander in chief. The smear on Joe Biden comes from the Kremlin. Trump is unwilling to confront Putin, who put bounties on American soldiers in Afghanistan. The confidence in this judgment is low to moderate due to various factors.

I believe the media is protecting Biden like big tech. It's outrageous that the media focuses on his ice cream flavor while ignoring serious allegations. The mayor of Moscow's wife gave his family millions, and Hunter Biden mentioned giving "the big guy" 10% of some massive income. China gave them a billion and a half dollars to manage. This is a huge scandal, second only to the spying on my campaign, which is totally verified. But you won't cover any of it. You're going to ask him about ice cream instead of the millions from Moscow or the energy company paying his son with no experience. The laptop is a major issue because it reveals potential corruption involving money from Russia, Ukraine, and China. It's one of the biggest scandals ever, yet you claim it can't be verified, even though they found the laptop.

Speaker 0 asks how the speaker plans to convince Americans who are upset about Hunter Biden's laptop that he is fighting for them. Speaker 1 dismisses the laptop allegations as a smear, stating that every serious investigator has debunked them. He mentions previous similar allegations and points to overwhelming evidence from the intelligence community that the Russians are involved. Speaker 1 defends his son's integrity and highlights that during the impeachment, all major Trump officials testified under oath that Biden did his job and broke no laws. He criticizes the president for contributing to the crass and dirty state of politics. Speaker 0 asks one more question.

Fifty former national intelligence officials, including former heads of the CIA from both parties, have stated that the accusations against me are unfounded and part of a Russian disinformation campaign. With just four days left in the campaign, the emergence of this laptop story seems like a desperate attempt to smear me and my family. The intelligence community has overwhelming evidence of Russian involvement, and I believe the stories about my son are also linked to this. The majority of intelligence experts agree that there is no basis for these claims.

We covered the Russia hoax constantly because the FBI was actively investigating it. We reported what unnamed FBI agents were saying. Any viewer would have believed that Trump and Putin conspired in 2016, but that was completely false. Trump went to extraordinary lengths to keep his meetings with Putin secret, even from his own administration. When asked if he ever worked for Russia, Trump responded that it was the most insulting question he’d ever been asked and the most insulting article ever written about him. He did not directly answer the question, which is a stunning turn of events. Did the President of the United States ever work on behalf of the Russians against American interests?

There's been three great scandals in the twenty first century. First, the Russian collusion hoax prompted by Hillary Clinton and facilitated by the Obama administration on its way out that almost destroyed the Trump campaign, sabotaged his transition, and ate up twenty two months of his first two years. Second, the Biden FBI, and CIA, but especially the CIA and the intelligence agencies, got 51 people, former intelligence authorities, to lie to the American people on the eve of the second debate to affect the two thousand twenty election and claimed falsely that Donald Trump was lying about the laptop of Biden Hunter Biden, that it was fake, that it was a Russian production and Donald Trump then was colluding again with the Russians. That was a complete lie. It was Hunter's laptop, we know because the FBI had it in his possessions and unauthenticated. And finally, the great scandal that the Democratic Party and the obsequious media knew that Joe Biden was non compost mentees. He was not cognitively cognitively able to fulfill the office of presidents, the presidency, and they kept that from the American people until they could no longer keep it when he finally challenged Donald Trump to a debate and melted before our very eyes, sort of like the Wicked Witch and The Wizard of Oz. He melted into a nonentity.

Speaking about 2016 events, the speaker questions why the FBI never took the server and why they were told to leave the DNC office: 'Haven't they taken the server? Why was the FBI told to leave the office of the Democratic National Committee?' He says: 'Where is the server? I wanna know where is the server, and what is the server saying?' 'I've been wondering that. I've been asking that for months and months, and I've been tweeting it out and calling it out on social media.' He adds: 'My people came to me. Dan Coats came to me and some others. They said they think it's Russia.' 'I have president Putin. He just said it's not Russia.' 'I will say this. I don't see any reason why it would be, but I do wanna see the server.' 'With that being said, all I can do is ask the question.'

If I were president, Putin would never have gone into Ukraine. I had a good relationship with him, which is a good thing. When asked who I trusted more, my intelligence people or Putin, it was a tough question. I didn't trust the intelligence people because they were bad people. They caused a fake Russia scam that harmed our country. But I was right, Putin would never have gone into Ukraine.

Speaker 0: This thing over with. You see the hatred he's got for Putin. It's very tough for me to make a deal with that kind of hate. I'm aligned with the world. I wanna get the things set. If you want me to be tough? I could be tougher than any human being you've ever seen, but you're never gonna get a deal that way. Speaker 1: For four years in The United States Of America... we had a president who stood up at press conferences and talked tough about Vladimir Putin, and then Putin invaded Ukraine. The path to peace... is engaging in diplomacy. Speaker 2: He occupied it, our parts, big parts of Ukraine, parts of East and Crimea. So 2014. We signed ceasefire, gas contract, but after that, he broken the ceasefire, he killed our people, and he didn't exchange prisoners. What kind of diplomacy? Speaker 0: You should be thanking the president for trying to bring it into this conference. Speaker 2: We have problems. Speaker 0: You're gambling with World War three. You have the cards. With us, you have the cards. Without us you don't have any cards. I gave you the javelins to take out all those tanks. Obama gave you sheets. What if Russia breaks his fire?