reSee.it - Related Video Feed

Hunter Biden's admission that the laptop was his coincided with an indictment against Trump. Similarly, news of Ukraine allegedly paying Biden a bribe was followed by an indictment against Trump. Recently, a Biden insider revealed that Biden had frequent conversations with Hunter's business partners, who allegedly paid Hunter to influence his father to fire a Ukrainian prosecutor. Today, Biden's Justice Department indicted Trump on charges related to January 6th. These events suggest a pattern of indictments being timed to divert attention from Biden.

After Hunter Biden's guilty plea, IRS whistleblowers expressed disbelief at an internal email praising the conviction, highlighting a perceived double standard in how sensitive investigations are handled, especially for powerful individuals. They confirmed that the "big guy" referenced in emails was Joe Biden and noted that both the DOJ and FBI were aware of the legitimacy of Hunter's laptop long before the 2020 election. They alleged that political influence affected their investigation, with additional approvals required for high-profile cases. The whistleblowers have faced retaliation from the IRS and are now pursuing legal action against Hunter Biden's attorney for defamation. They emphasized the importance of restoring public confidence in fair justice, regardless of status, and acknowledged the personal toll of their whistleblowing efforts.

Hunter Biden is not a victim; he has been enabled by Joe Biden, who used him for personal gain, as suggested by emails indicating a 10% cut for the "big guy." The initial strategy was to have a DA slow-walk the case, but public pressure forced a plea deal that was overly lenient. This deal was described as "carefully negotiated" to benefit Hunter, but it faced criticism for being unjust and unlikely to hold up in court. The backlash revealed the deal's flaws, leading to its eventual collapse.

President Biden and his administration are being accused of politicizing the Department of Justice for personal and political gain. They are allegedly targeting political opponents, such as Donald Trump and his supporters, while also protecting themselves and their allies. This undermines the foundation of our democracy, the rule of law. If this continues, it sets a dangerous precedent where the party in power can use law enforcement to go after their opponents. The FBI and DOJ are being criticized for being weaponized and politicized, leading to unequal justice and application of laws. Additionally, Biden's previous denials about his involvement in his son's foreign business deals are being contradicted by evidence. The actions of the administration are deeply concerning and do not reflect the values of the American people.

Hunter Biden, son of Joe Biden, is facing multiple charges including possession of a gun and federal felony tax charges. The special prosecutor handling the case has been criticized for their handling of the plea agreement, which fell apart. While tax charges are usually resolved through civil means, these charges against Hunter Biden were unexpected. It is worth noting that the amount of money involved in the tax evasion is not significant, and Hunter Biden had already paid it back. This situation challenges the argument of a two-tiered justice system, as Hunter Biden has faced legal consequences.

Politician Joe Biden's son, Hunter Biden, was appointed to the board of Burisma and received a large sum of money despite lacking qualifications. Hunter Biden admitted that he got the position because of his name. Burisma executives sought his help with pressure from a Ukrainian prosecutor. Joe Biden visited Ukraine and criticized the prosecutor, leading to his firing. These facts align with information provided by a confidential source to the FBI. Hunter Biden connected Burisma with Blue Star Strategies to gain support from US officials. The case against Burisma's owner was dropped, as desired. The Biden Justice Department attempted to cover up the situation, but two whistleblowers and a Delaware judge prevented it. This inquiry is crucial to expose this recurring pattern.

After Hunter Biden's guilty plea, IRS whistleblowers expressed disbelief at an internal email praising the conviction, highlighting perceived bias in IRS investigations. They alleged that "sensitive investigations" favor powerful individuals, requiring excessive approvals for cases like Biden's while allowing quicker actions against ordinary taxpayers. They confirmed that the FBI and DOJ knew Hunter's laptop was legitimate but were restricted from pursuing certain investigative steps due to the election. The whistleblowers believe there’s a double standard in how investigations are conducted based on political connections. They have faced retaliation for their disclosures, impacting their careers and personal lives, yet they maintain that their actions were justified to uphold public confidence in the justice system.

The White House has criticized the GOP for investigating Hunter Biden, but they may have undermined their own argument. During the first family's return from Delaware on Marine One, Hunter Biden was seen getting off the helicopter, even though he wasn't on the passenger list provided by the White House. Hunter is currently defying a congressional subpoena and facing charges that could result in a total of 42 years in prison. This raises questions about the White House's claim that the president is not involved in Hunter's legal troubles.

The special counsel did not charge President Biden with a crime, citing his failing memory. This report highlights a double standard, as President Trump is facing charges for the same offense. The Democratic party is trying to convict and imprison Trump to prevent his re-election, which is what you would expect in countries like Pakistan or Brazil, not in the United States.

After Hunter Biden's guilty plea, IRS whistleblowers expressed disbelief at an internal email praising the conviction, highlighting a perceived disparity in how the IRS treats investigations involving powerful individuals. They noted that sensitive investigations require extra approvals, creating a double standard. The whistleblowers confirmed that both the IRS and FBI knew Hunter Biden's laptop was legitimate long before the 2020 election, yet it was labeled as disinformation to influence the election outcome. They alleged that the Biden family benefited financially from Hunter's business dealings, asserting that there is substantial evidence of access and influence. Despite facing retaliation from the IRS, they remain committed to their cause, emphasizing the need for public confidence in fair justice administration.

Everyone anticipated Biden would pardon his son, but the extent of his dishonesty is shocking. Democrats are realizing they aren't the party of moral superiority; they've lied about numerous issues, including the laptop and the lab leak. This has led to a loss of faith in their principles. All politicians lie to protect their interests, but Trump is different—he openly states his intentions. Biden's blanket pardon raises questions about a potential money laundering scheme involving Hunter Biden, who is connected to numerous legal troubles. Calls for impeachment arise, but Republicans hesitate due to a lack of evidence. Ironically, Trump faced impeachment for investigating what Biden just pardoned his son for, highlighting the hypocrisy surrounding foreign influence on the first family.

The speaker highlights the existence of a two-track justice system in the country, where certain individuals receive preferential treatment. They discuss their experience with the Hunter Biden tax investigation, stating that decisions were made to benefit Hunter Biden throughout the process. Examples include prosecutors hiding laptop contents, delaying search warrants until after the 2020 election, and not pursuing potential evidence. Investigators were also restricted from following up on WhatsApp messages and instructed not to ask about Hunter Biden's father during interviews. The Biden transition team was informed about interviews beforehand, resulting in only one witness speaking to investigators. These instances demonstrate how the investigation was hindered.

In 2018, the oversight committee revealed that Hunter Biden made monthly payments of around $1400 to his father using a business account linked to China. Hunter claims it was for car payments, but there is no evidence of any loan agreement. This raises concerns of money laundering and tax evasion, as it appears they were trying to hide the money from the IRS and the public. Joe Biden, who has advocated for everyone to pay their fair share, seems to be avoiding his own fair share along with his family.

Authoritarian regimes often use politicized justice to suppress dissent, where opponents face severe penalties while supporters evade consequences. Recent events illustrate this in the U.S. For instance, a man attempted to stab Congressman Lee Zeldin but was released without bail, while Steve Bannon was convicted of contempt of Congress, a charge not applied to others like Eric Holder or Lois Lerner, who evaded accountability. This reflects a double standard in the justice system, where political affiliations dictate outcomes. Bannon's trial lacked fairness, as he couldn't present a defense or confront his accusers from the January 6th committee, highlighting a troubling trend of selective prosecution under the current administration.

The case against Hunter Biden is seen as politically motivated, similar to Trump's trial in New York. Both situations have damaged public confidence in institutions, as they appear to be weaponized against political opponents. While some celebrate Trump's conviction, it contradicts discussions about criminal justice and second chances within the party. The charges in both cases would likely not have been pursued if one side didn't see an opportunity to exploit them politically.

In a bitter divorce trial, the speaker's ex-wife turned down a $1,000,000 settlement. Joe Biden's involvement led to legal troubles for the speaker and his brother, resulting in an $8,200 tax charge. The brother pleaded guilty, straining their relationship. The speaker recalls past interactions with Biden and reflects on the recent legal issues faced by Hunter Biden. The comparison between the speaker's case and Hunter Biden's recent misdemeanor charges is highlighted, emphasizing the disparity in outcomes.

Garland's lack of seriousness regarding the Burisma and Hunter Biden situation is evident. Burisma, a corrupt energy company in Ukraine, is known for its corruption. When asked about the special prosecutor Viktor Shokin, Garland claimed ignorance. This indicates his disinterest in Burisma. The video of Joe Biden threatening to withhold $1 billion unless the prosecutor investigating Burisma, and thus his son, was fired, suggests a quid pro quo and bribery. It's clear that Garland doesn't care about this. The existence of a two-tier justice system is evident, and Garland himself should face impeachment.

Hunter Biden's privilege and questionable actions are the focus here. The speaker criticizes President Biden and the media for not addressing Hunter's privilege, despite lecturing about privilege and injustice. Hunter's wealth and connections are attributed to his father, rather than his own abilities. The speaker also highlights the sleazy behavior surrounding Hunter and the Biden family, suggesting that it should concern fair-minded individuals. They argue that evidence shows President Biden was aware of and enabled Hunter's actions, benefiting from them. The speaker calls for justice and transparency, expressing concern about the compromised state of the US attorney investigating the matter.

Hunter Biden's issues are minor compared to the corruption associated with Trump. Even if Joe Biden were involved in wrongdoing through Hunter's dealings, it pales in comparison to Trump's actions, such as those related to Trump University. While there are concerns about the handling of Hunter's laptop and the suppression of information, it was a strategic decision, albeit controversial. The discussion isn't just about left versus right; figures like Liz Cheney also oppose Trump. The idea of a conspiracy can be misunderstood; it's about people coming together to address a significant issue, similar to discussing how to deflect an asteroid heading toward Earth.

President Trump's home was raided over a document dispute, while Hunter Biden and Joe Biden are being protected by the Justice Department. The Biden administration is ignoring the American people's concerns about the equal application of the rule of law.

President Biden has committed to respecting the judicial process, stating he will not pardon his son, Hunter, if convicted. This decision highlights a stark contrast with Donald Trump's approach to legal challenges. Biden emphasizes the importance of the rule of law, asserting that no one, including family, is above it. While Biden accepts the jury's verdict, Trump continues to claim the system is rigged against him. This situation underscores the differing values between the two leaders, with Biden prioritizing legal integrity over personal loyalty. Ultimately, Biden's stance reinforces the principle that justice must be upheld, regardless of personal ties.

The Biden family used Joe Biden's name to make millions, with Joe's knowledge. Joe was dishonest about his family's business dealings. He met with his son's partners, used an alias for emails, and took actions coinciding with their business. During the 2020 campaign, a lawyer paid off Hunter Biden's taxes to avoid political risk. Hunter believed his legal issues would disappear when Joe became president. Joe benefited from his power, did not stop it, and lied about it.

Hunter Biden's alleged selling of access to his father, referred to as the "big guy," is the reason why we were interested in him. This raises concerns about a potentially compromised president in the White House. Americans should be worried about this situation.

Dr. Gal Luft, a former senior advisor to the China Energy Company (CFC), shares his ordeal regarding his knowledge of the Biden family's relations with CFC. In March 2019, he informed the US government about this, concerned that if the Bidens came to power, it would lead to a scandal similar to the Russia collusion scandal. Despite providing information to the Department of Justice (DOJ) about financial transactions and a potential mole within the DOJ, no action was taken until 9 months later when Hunter Biden's laptop was seized. Dr. Luft was subsequently arrested on unrelated charges and faced harassment. He questions the DOJ's motives and highlights the lack of punishment for the Biden family's alleged influence peddling.

Hunter Biden is back in the news as the DOJ claims a Romanian oligarch paid him to influence US policy while his father was VP. Documents reveal Hunter received $3,000,000 from Gabriel Papaviccu, a Romanian businessman facing a criminal investigation. Prosecutors allege Hunter concealed the nature of his work to protect President Biden. Papavicu is set to testify at Hunter's tax evasion trial in September. Republicans argue Hunter used his father's name for access.