TruthArchive.ai - Related Video Feed

Most people in Western countries, including the United States and Canada, received the COVID vaccine two years ago. However, there is a lack of discussion about the motives behind governments' push for vaccination. The speaker questions why governments forced people to take the vaccine and suggests that it reveals a lack of democracy and freedom in these countries. They highlight the case of Canada, where the prime minister attacked those who refused the vaccine. The speaker also discusses the trucker protests in Canada and the government's response, which involved invoking emergency powers and suppressing dissent. They emphasize the importance of open and honest discourse and the need for a more engaged and accountable government.

In a divided and toxic political climate, Canada experienced a decline in its economy, national debt, and energy industry. Laws meant to protect citizens were exploited for government control, and promises were broken. Scandals tainted the integrity of leadership, leading to record inflation, a housing crisis, and soaring food costs. The inexperience of a school teacher and journalist in making economic decisions had crippling consequences. Citizens' hard-earned money was seized, innocent people were arrested, and freedoms were discarded. Divisive politics labeled peaceful Canadians as racists and homophobes. However, there is hope for change as a new government promises to prioritize the people and rebuild a united Canada.

The speaker argues that the government's "combating misinformation bill" signifies the end of free speech in Australia, granting the government excessive control over the exchange of ideas. The bill compels digital platforms to censor content that may cause "serious harm," including content impacting public health or preventive measures. The speaker recalls the government censoring 4,000 social media posts during the pandemic, many of which later proved accurate. They cite concerns from legal counsel about digital platforms lacking expertise to identify misinformation, and from the Human Rights Commission that the bill doesn't balance censorship and free expression. The speaker claims the government and health bureaucrats spread misinformation during the pandemic by falsely claiming mRNA injections were safe and effective, that mandates would stop transmission, and that the injections would prevent illness. They criticize the exclusion of mainstream media from the bill, alleging media suppression of information, such as vested interests of health experts, deregistration of dissenting doctors, vaccine contract details, excess deaths, adverse reaction reports, and risks to the young versus the elderly. The speaker urges Australians to oppose the bill.

While attention is on Trump’s election bid, a concerning story about Canada’s involvement in COVID-19 is emerging. The Trudeau government allegedly allowed the National Microbiology Laboratory in Winnipeg to ship deadly viruses to China’s Wuhan Institute of Virology, despite warnings from CSIS about military ties. Instead of halting operations, the government continued collaboration, which may have contributed to the pandemic. Genetic markers of SARS CoV 2 found in Wuhan match viruses sent from Winnipeg. The Trudeau administration reportedly obstructed investigations and delayed accountability, allowing involved scientists to return to China. This negligence could have played a role in a pandemic that resulted in millions of deaths and significant global disruption. The situation raises serious questions about government responsibility and the potential for treasonous actions in the face of a global crisis.

The speaker discusses four ways in which the Canadian healthcare system has been hijacked. Firstly, agile regulations have allowed drugs like mRNA technology to be approved without proving safety. Public health officials were given scripts to promote vaccine benefits, starting with a pre-marketing campaign called "building vaccine confidence." The Canadian Global Media, CBC, joined the Trusted News Initiative in 2019, allowing certain players to control the narrative. Taxpayer money was used to pay off researchers through the Globet R road map, aligning with the World Health Organization's agenda. The head of NAFC received significant research funding during the pandemic, raising concerns about impartiality. The co-chair of NAFLI also received funding to prepare Canadians for vaccine readiness.

Currently, there is too much convergence between the government, the National Assembly, and the general press, which is unhealthy. There needs to be checks and balances, debates, and many decisions being made are authoritarian and lack scientific substance. For example, forcing people to take an experimental vaccine without giving them a choice is unethical and goes against the principles of medical experimentation. In the future, we will look back and question how such things were allowed to happen. The communication world is starting to collide with reality, whether it's about vaccines or other issues. The vaccines were rushed and not properly evaluated, and there have been adverse effects reported. The number of complaints against the vaccines will continue to rise. It's important to understand the risks and benefits and not exaggerate the severity of the disease.

Behind the scenes communications from the BC Centre for Disease Control revealed that COVID-19 vaccines were 16 times more dangerous than flu shots for children. The data was manipulated before being released to the public, omitting comparisons to flu vaccines and downplaying serious adverse events. This lack of transparency raises concerns about health regulators withholding vital information from the public.

Politicians and health bureaucrats are denying their role in advocating for lockdowns, vaccine mandates, and school closures during the pandemic. Justin Trudeau, the Canadian Prime Minister, claims he never insisted on mandatory vaccinations for everyone, despite evidence to the contrary. Anthony Fauci, a key figure in the COVID response, also tries to distance himself from the heavy-handed measures. Both leaders are attempting to rewrite history and avoid responsibility for the negative consequences of their actions. It is important to hold them accountable for the overreach and inhumane policies imposed on free people in the name of safety.

Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau claimed that normalcy would not return without a vaccine, which was criticized as unfounded. Allegations were made that Trudeau was involved in a financial crime related to vaccine partnerships, accusing him of running an illegal monopoly for profit. It was suggested that Canada controlled the mRNA vaccine platform and stood to benefit financially from partnerships with vaccine companies. The focus was on maintaining a monopoly rather than public health, with accusations of price fixing and illegal control of the global market.

It's extraordinary how the government collaborated with social media to spread misinformation and suppress the truth. The public deserved to know about alternative COVID treatments and vaccine side effects. This was preplanned by an elite group, as seen with Event 201. This is a concerning loss of freedom that needs exposure. Many in Congress avoid looking into it, pushing vaccines and ignoring potential injuries or deaths. People don't want to admit they were wrong. We need courageous reporters to expose the truth, so Americans can understand what's happening. We're on a dangerous path planned by elites seeking total control. They're increasing government spending and size, and maneuvering the WHO for a takeover. The 2024 WHO amendments are frightening and risk our sovereignty. People must awaken to these dangers.

Back then, you couldn't say anything about masks or vaccines without facing censorship. It was considered a public health threat. Now, two years later, we're seeing news admitting that there were mistakes due to censorship. No one was interested in the truth or studying the situation. People were more focused on imposing restrictions and control. We need freedom to debate. It's concerning that a public organization can gather and accuse someone of lying on the internet without any consequences. Is this the solution? Is this the way forward?

Misinformation is a complex issue. Some false information may not be harmful, so censoring someone for being wrong can be questionable. However, during the early stages of the COVID pandemic, there were health implications and limited time to verify scientific assumptions. Unfortunately, the establishment wavered on facts and requested censorship of information that turned out to be debatable or true. This undermines trust.

Canada's institutions, including the justice system, are seen as deeply flawed. The prime minister's remarks about protesters in Ottawa were criticized for being divisive and elitist, reflecting a wider issue of elitism in Canadian politics. The lack of criticism towards institutions like the judiciary is concerning.

A recent report revealed that two Chinese spies worked at the Winnipeg microbiology lab, sending sensitive materials to the People's Liberation Army. Despite warnings from CSIS, the Trudeau government took no action until the spies were quietly sent back to China, coinciding with a snap election in 2021. This raises questions about potential collusion between the Liberal government and China. A parliamentary report on this issue was released on the day of the U.S. presidential election, leading to suspicions of a cover-up. The implications of this espionage could be significant, including the possibility that COVID-19 was linked to activities in Canada. The government has failed to comply with requests for documents related to this matter, prompting concerns about national security and the integrity of Canadian politics. The situation calls for vigilance and a commitment to uphold democratic rights and free speech.

There are those who are intentionally undermining mainstream media, such as conspiracy theorists and social media influencers who keep people in filter bubbles. This prevents agreement on common facts, unlike when CBC, CTV, and Global were the main news sources projecting a shared understanding across the country.

The government crossed a bright red line when it suppressed scientific and policy discussions during COVID, treating dissenting voices as akin to those of international terrorists. This suppression is wrong; free speech, allowing debate among scientists, policymakers, and the public, is a fundamental American norm. The government's actions prevented this debate, leading to harmful lockdown policies, vaccine mandates, job losses, prolonged school closures, and economic devastation. This censorship, ironically, cost lives. Contrary to claims that free speech is dangerous during a pandemic, upholding the First Amendment would have saved lives and reduced the damage and destruction we experienced.

The government is using influencers and marketing money to combat the spread of false information online, which poses a threat to democracy. By reaching Canadians where they are, the government aims to share its goals and actions to counter misinformation. The rapid spread of lies can lead to increased skepticism and critical thinking among the public.

In 2019, the Canadian government removed the crime of spreading false news from the Criminal Code. This raises concerns about trusting a government that takes our money, restricts effective treatments, and fails to investigate the safety of promoted vaccines. Additionally, the parliament we elect allows mainstream media to freely lie without consequences.

In January 2022, a colleague alerted Speaker 0 that there had been a doubling or tripling of baby deaths in the last year, which sparked curiosity. Speaker 1 states that “Their own government told us a medical treatment was safe, and it killed babies.” Speaker 2 says she has “lost all faith that Health Canada is looking out genuinely for the best interests of Canadians.” Speaker 3 alleges that doctors “made extra money to push vaccines” and were given a billing code to do it, and that she has “pulled all the billing codes.” Speaker 4 asserts that “They've purchased the vaccine that hasn't been approved,” distributed it to the provinces so that once it’s approved, they can “start jabbing ourselves with it” and “start jabbing pregnant mothers with it.” Speaker 3 questions the necessity of vaccinations: “Why did we have to get these vaccinations? Like, why was this something that we had to do? You go to the hospital, you expect to have a baby, and you expect to go home, and then you don't.” Speaker 0 speculates on criminal negligence, saying, “I would suspect that there was criminal negligence on part of the government and the public health officials.” Speaker 3 notes that it is “highly recommended that pregnant women get their vaccine as soon as possible.” Speaker 0 contends that a narrative was pushed to everybody, including pregnant and breastfeeding women, that the mRNA shots were safe and effective. Speaker 2 claims wiretapping, harassment, charging, and barring expert witnesses: “They had wiretapped her phone. They had harassed her. They had charged her. They didn't allow any expert witnesses to testify.” Speaker 1 accuses police of trying to cover up Canadian babies’ deaths “to the point of stopping detective Helen Greaves from testifying about it.” Speaker 4 observes that “The dominant individuals keep the subordinates in their place by constant aggression.” Speaker 5 discusses vaccination choice versus public risk, remarking, “If you don't wanna get vaccinated, that's your choice. But don't think you can get on a plane or a train besides vaccinated people and put them at risk,” and claims CBC initially “started off with CBC running a story to implicate her and to paint her with a brush that looks uncomplimentary to the public.” Speaker 6 claims Canada must shift its understanding of what the is, describing it as “a state broadcaster pushing the agenda of the Liberal government of Canada.” Speaker 4 calls this “the most significant matter affecting our children today from a health perspective,” noting that authorities are “not investigating.” Speaker 2 concludes that everything emanates outward from this case involving law enforcement, the judicial system, the pharmaceutical industry, and health agencies, “how they work together, how they censored information. It all ties together to this one case, and that's what makes it so dangerous.”

In 2019, Bill C39 removed the crime of spreading false news from the Canadian Criminal Code. This change was discovered when comparing the 1954 and 2020 versions of the code. It raises questions about trusting the government, which is accused of stealing money, restricting effective treatments, and not properly investigating promoted vaccines. The parliament, elected to protect citizens, has granted mainstream media outlets like CDC and CTV the freedom to lie without consequences.

The United States government has been the main source of misinformation during the pandemic, spreading false claims about COVID transmission, vaccine immunity, and mask effectiveness. The Cochrane review, the most authoritative evidence body in medicine, disproves these claims. Myocarditis is actually more common after vaccination, and young people don't benefit from boosters. Top vaccine experts resigned from the FDA in protest. Vaccine mandates didn't increase vaccination rates, but instead created a group of never vaxxers. Medical research has been weaponized, with the CDC releasing flawed studies to support their desired outcomes. Public health officials have been dishonest and lied to the American people.

Justin Trudeau covered up a security breach at a Canadian lab where dangerous viruses are studied. Documents show collaboration with China's military on bioweapons. Trudeau refused to release documents, sued to keep them secret, and tried to buy vaccines from China. Despite knowing the risks, he called a snap election, and China interfered to help him win. Trudeau's actions show he cannot be trusted to protect Canada.

The Canadian health care system was hijacked in four ways. Firstly, they used agile regulations to approve drugs without proving their safety. Secondly, public health officials were given scripts to promote the benefits of vaccines, starting with a pre-marketing campaign. Thirdly, the Canadian global media, including CBC, joined the Trusted News Initiative, allowing outside influence on their reporting. Lastly, taxpayer money was used to pay off experts and researchers who followed the World Health Organization's agenda. For example, the head of NACI received millions in research funding and gave the blessing for immunization. These actions were taken before knowing the vaccines' effectiveness.

We all felt fear during the pandemic. Some doctors criticized those who didn't get vaccinated. The hate comes from the top down, influencing behavior. Canadians were targeted in a psyops operation by the military to create fear and compliance. Misinformation about masking affected trust in public health officials. Some people believe the vaccine doesn't work.