reSee.it - Related Video Feed

John Watt, a COVID vaccine-injured individual, expresses his frustration and pain, highlighting the lack of support for those affected by the vaccine. He questions why the authorities have neglected the thousands of people suffering adverse reactions. The Prime Minister acknowledges John's concerns and promises to investigate individual cases through the existing compensation scheme. He emphasizes that decisions regarding the vaccine rollout were based on medical advice and that they are committed to addressing any shortcomings. John's voice is muffled, preventing viewers from hearing his full story. The Prime Minister encourages John to share his details with the team for further investigation.

Speaker 0: Because there was such a mass vaccination campaign with a product that, you know, tens of thousands, hundreds of thousands of people were injured in this process, what work is the NIH doing in terms of research to somehow help these people? Because just from my own experience, my wife and I made a film about this, right? These people were, even though in some cases they were supported a bit by, but mostly just completely gaslit and just, no, your issue doesn't exist. Right? So how are you approaching this? Speaker 1: Well, you're absolutely right. There were absolutely like, lot patients of who were vaccine injured were gaslit, pretending as if they didn't get injured or that somehow their symptoms are all Speaker 1: in their head or something. Actually, this is part of a broader phenomenon, where, you have patients with conditions that are poorly understood, where the medical system will gaslight them leave. They can they're telling you it's a a psychological issue rather than a physical issue. It should make you think that you're crazy because you you you have symptoms that you just, you know you have, but you can't convince anyone else to do anything about it. Injury is one of them, long COVID, MECFS, Lyme chronic Lyme disease, a whole host of these conditions where it just fits a very similar pattern. Speaker 1: The key underlying thing is that there isn't excellent science to guide decision making for clinicians or anybody else, for patients. And I've made sure that people know at the NIH that I'm very interested in investing in answers for patients for all of those. Vaccine injury, long COVID, MECFS, chronic Lyme. We need to get better answers. The the gaslighting happens because the, if you're let's say you're a doctor and you see a patient and you have no idea what's causing their condition. Speaker 1: Right? Because the scientific literature doesn't have an answer. You're gonna be unless you're an amazing doctor who's really good at, you know, sort of being honest and compassionate, you're going to be wanting to, like, move on to the next patient. And, it's really, really unfortunate. The answer is to get good answers, right? Speaker 1: So invest in, research on treatments, on underlying physiology, physiological causes, you know, basic biological knowledge, so that those patients actually can can the doctors and the caregivers for those patients can will treat them correctly. Speaker 0: So but is is NIH doing this for people that are that have been COVID vaccine injures against a huge number of people relatively. Speaker 1: We have investments in that, and we're going have more investments in that at the start, you know, this year. For all of those conditions, I think patients deserve an answer, and I'm definitely, interested in finding I would love to know myself.

No successful coronavirus vaccine has been made. Gene-based vaccines were tested on animals, leading to sickness and death. Despite concerns about safety and lack of long-term data, Canada continued vaccine rollout. A doctor raised safety concerns, was reprimanded for causing vaccine hesitancy, and saw neurological issues in patients post-vaccination. Questions to health authorities went unanswered, leading to a complaint to the College of Physicians and Surgeons.

There is a lack of medical curiosity in investigating vaccine side effects. The number of adverse reactions reported is small compared to the actual cases. Patients with vaccine injuries struggle to be heard and compensated. Medical practitioners need to engage with affected individuals, conduct research, and provide safe healthcare. The compensation scheme is inadequate, requiring extensive documentation for claims. Many young people are experiencing serious health issues post-vaccination. More support and follow-up are needed for those suffering from vaccine injuries.

People received the COVID vaccine for various reasons, including vulnerability, protecting loved ones and patients, and traveling. Afterward, they experienced injuries and were often dismissed by doctors who didn't know how to help or attributed the symptoms to other causes. Some were told not to share their stories. Many faced disbelief and bullying, with some receiving death threats. They have been injured for months. No one seems to know how to help, research the injuries, or believe them. Experiences shared on social media were labeled as misinformation, leading to warnings, bans, and the silencing of support groups. Reports to VAERS often went unanswered or were incorrectly recorded. Despite being told their experiences are rare and the vaccines are safe, their reality is unchanged. They feel abandoned, marginalized, and silenced, and seek help, research, and recognition. They emphasize they are real people, not misinformation, and are not rare.

Chris Nemeth, a once healthy 49-year-old, developed a chronic neurological disorder called CIDP after receiving his first AstraZeneca vaccine. He experienced symptoms such as headaches, tingling fingers, facial palsy, and paralysis from the waist down. Seeking justice, Nemeth is claiming compensation under the Australian government's COVID-19 vaccine claims scheme, along with over 3,000 other Australians who believe the vaccines made them ill. Tanya Nielsen, assisting injured individuals, highlights recognized vaccine side effects like heart issues from Pfizer and Guillain Barre syndrome from AstraZeneca. The scheme has already paid $7.7 million to 147 people, with more applications in progress. Nemeth is advocating for interim payments and a simpler system before the scheme closes next year.

COVID vaccines are declared safe by Speaker 0. Speaker 1 expresses pain, trauma, and regret due to lack of help for vaccine injuries. They mention others with amputations and heart conditions, and question why support is lacking. They criticize the vaccine damage payment scheme and highlight over 30,000 adverse reactions in Scotland. Speaker 1 demands that Rashid Shunaka do the right thing. Speaker 0 responds by stating that decisions during the pandemic were based on medical advice from experts, guiding vaccine rollout and eligibility.

John Watt, a COVID vaccine-injured individual, expresses his pain and frustration, highlighting the lack of support for those affected by the vaccine. He questions why he had to establish a support group in Scotland for vaccine victims and criticizes the inadequate vaccine damaged payment scheme. The Prime Minister acknowledges John's concerns and promises to address them, mentioning the existence of a compensation scheme. He emphasizes that decisions regarding the vaccine rollout were based on medical advice and encourages John to provide his details for further investigation. The Prime Minister expresses surprise at John's claim of being silenced and assures him that his case will be looked into.

Speaker 0: It was January 2022 when a colleague of mine in the unit came to me saying, something's up. We've had a doubling or tripling of baby deaths in the last year. And that's what got my curiosity piqued. Speaker 1: Their own government told us a medical treatment was safe, and it killed babies. Speaker 2: I have lost all faith that Health Canada is looking out genuine for the best interests of Canadians. Speaker 3: Doctors made extra money to push vaccines and they were given a billing code to do it. I have pulled all the billing codes. Speaker 2: They've purchased the vaccine that hasn't been approved. They've distributed it to the province so the second it's approved, we can start jabbing ourselves with it. We can start jabbing pregnant mothers with it. Speaker 4: Why did we have to get these vaccinations? Like, why was this something that we had to do? You go to the hospital, you expect to have a baby, and you expect to go home, And then you don't. Speaker 0: I was suspect that there was criminal negligence on part of the government and the public health officials. Possible. They pushed on with this narrative to everybody, including pregnant and breastfeeding women, that the mRNA shots were safe and effective. Speaker 2: They had wiretapped her phone. They had harassed her. They had charged her. They didn't allow any expert witnesses to testify. Speaker 1: Our Canadian babies died, and the police are trying to cover it up to the point of stopping detective Helen Greaves from testifying about it. Speaker 2: The dominant individuals keep the subordinates in their place by constant aggression. Speaker 4: If you don't want to get vaccinated, that's your choice. But don't think you can get on a plane or a train besides vaccinated people and put them at risk. Speaker 2: It started off with CBC running a story to implicate her and to paint her with a brush that looks uncomplimentary to the public. Speaker 5: Canada has to shift their understanding of what the CBC is. It is a state broadcaster pushing the agenda of the Liberal government of Canada. Speaker 2: This is the most significant matter affecting our children today from a health perspective, and they're still not investigating. Everything emanates outward from this case involving law enforcement, the judicial system, the pharmaceutical industry, our health agencies, how they work together, how they censored information. It all ties together to this one case, and that's what makes it so dangerous.

John, an NHS pharmacist, experienced significant issues following his vaccination. His family is angry that he had to endure bureaucratic trauma on top of his illness and recovery. The family's lawyer states that 350 people have been rejected from the vaccine damage payment scheme (VDPS) because they didn't meet the 60% disability threshold, which was originally designed for industrial injuries, not the complex impacts suffered by John. The family believes the system needs to be overhauled to be fair and transparent. They cite a two-year delay in John's case, during which he wasn't examined or consulted, and his rejection broke him psychologically. John believed in vaccination and saw the VDPS as vital for public confidence. The Department of Health stated that the COVID inquiry will consider VDPS reform in hearings next year and that qualified independent medical assessors undertake claim assessments. John's family feels the system failed him and wants accountability. They urge the government to take action.

The speaker claims the medical landscape is dominated by COVID vaccine injuries, disabilities, and deaths, and that they submit multiple entries daily to VAERS, facing scrutiny and potential penalties for falsification. They state they diagnosed an executive in her late thirties with Guillain Barre syndrome from COVID-19 vaccination. The speaker estimates that only 1% of manuscripts on COVID vaccine injuries are being published, suggesting a tremendous bias, and that there are about 4,000 papers on the vaccine debacle, which is about 1% of reality. They claim to have never seen myocarditis, heart failure, or blood clots from eating frosted flakes, but are seeing people devastated by the shots. The speaker advocates for removing COVID-19 vaccines from the market, a critical reevaluation of the vaccine schedule, dropping all vaccine mandates, and rescinding the 1986 Vaccine Injury Compensation Act.

The Countermeasures Injury Compensation Program (CICP) and the Vaccine Injury Compensation Program (VICP) are taxpayer funded. The VICP currently has a $4.3 billion surplus to aid vaccine-injured Americans. However, the VICP is struggling with a backlog of 5,000 non-COVID related claims, which are reviewed by only eight special masters. HR 5142, a bill aiming to modernize the program and update compensation, is projected to cost $10-20 billion. Democrats are hesitant to support the bill due to its vaccine association, while Republicans are unwilling to allocate the necessary funds. This leaves those seeking compensation in a difficult position, as pharmaceutical companies are protected and the government is reluctant to take responsibility.

COVID vaccines are declared safe by Speaker 0. Speaker 1 expresses pain, trauma, and regret due to lack of help for vaccine injuries. They mention people with amputations and heart conditions, and question why they had to set up a support group in Scotland. They criticize the vaccine damage payment scheme and state that over 30,000 people in Scotland have had adverse reactions to the vaccine. Speaker 1 demands that Rashid Shunaka start doing the right thing. Speaker 0 responds by saying that decisions regarding the vaccine were made based on medical advice from experts.

The speaker states that many people have been injured by the COVID vaccine, some fatally or permanently disabled, and that these people are not receiving sufficient care or attention. The speaker says that the 1986 Vaccine Act is a major impediment to change. According to the speaker, Congress recognized that vaccines were "unavoidably unsafe" when it granted vaccine companies immunity, so it created a federal program with a trust fund to compensate those injured. The program is funded by a 75% surcharge on every vaccine. The speaker says the vaccine court is supposed to be generous and fast, but the speaker believes the lawyers defaulted to protecting the trust fund instead of taking care of people. The speaker says the program has paid out over $5 billion to about 12,000 people. The speaker says they are looking at ways to enlarge the program so that COVID vaccine-injured people can be compensated, including enlarging the statute of limitations.

An analysis of clinical trial data showed that for every eight hundred people vaccinated, one suffers a serious adverse event. The goal is to end the silence for the one in eight hundred. It is time to stop politicizing vaccine injuries and start building meaningful recognition, research, competent care, and fair and just compensation.

My name is Cody Flint, an agricultural pilot injured by the Pfizer COVID-19 vaccine. I've always wanted to be a pilot and take pride in my work. It's frustrating that my situation isn't being studied because it doesn't fit the narrative. The damage to my family in 13 months is significant. People like me deserve help after being misled by the government. It's wrong to make people go through this.

A nurse injured by the COVID vaccine has spent the last four years building a community of vaccine-injured people. She asks others to join her in taking down "these criminals." Another individual states they will fight for the cause for life, even if they have to do so from a wheelchair, as they currently cannot stand for more than a minute without convulsions. They want to help people of their generation, who they believe are heavily influenced by the media, understand that things can go wrong. They feel obligated to speak up and will never back down.

The family of NHS pharmacist John Cross, who died by suicide after suffering complications from a COVID vaccine, are calling for reform of the government's vaccine damage compensation scheme. Cross suffered a rare neurological complication that left him paralyzed and breathing through a tube. After seven months in the hospital, he was left with permanent pain and numbness. His family says that he came home weak and traumatized, and despite treatment, he had relapses. His doctors urged him to claim compensation, but his claim was rejected because, according to the scheme's medical assessor, he wasn't disabled enough, even though the assessor agreed the vaccine was the cause of his condition. Faced with more treatment, he took his own life. His family believes he did not want to be a burden.

In January 2022, a colleague alerted Speaker 0 that there had been a doubling or tripling of baby deaths in the last year, which sparked curiosity. Speaker 1 states that “Their own government told us a medical treatment was safe, and it killed babies.” Speaker 2 says she has “lost all faith that Health Canada is looking out genuinely for the best interests of Canadians.” Speaker 3 alleges that doctors “made extra money to push vaccines” and were given a billing code to do it, and that she has “pulled all the billing codes.” Speaker 4 asserts that “They've purchased the vaccine that hasn't been approved,” distributed it to the provinces so that once it’s approved, they can “start jabbing ourselves with it” and “start jabbing pregnant mothers with it.” Speaker 3 questions the necessity of vaccinations: “Why did we have to get these vaccinations? Like, why was this something that we had to do? You go to the hospital, you expect to have a baby, and you expect to go home, and then you don't.” Speaker 0 speculates on criminal negligence, saying, “I would suspect that there was criminal negligence on part of the government and the public health officials.” Speaker 3 notes that it is “highly recommended that pregnant women get their vaccine as soon as possible.” Speaker 0 contends that a narrative was pushed to everybody, including pregnant and breastfeeding women, that the mRNA shots were safe and effective. Speaker 2 claims wiretapping, harassment, charging, and barring expert witnesses: “They had wiretapped her phone. They had harassed her. They had charged her. They didn't allow any expert witnesses to testify.” Speaker 1 accuses police of trying to cover up Canadian babies’ deaths “to the point of stopping detective Helen Greaves from testifying about it.” Speaker 4 observes that “The dominant individuals keep the subordinates in their place by constant aggression.” Speaker 5 discusses vaccination choice versus public risk, remarking, “If you don't wanna get vaccinated, that's your choice. But don't think you can get on a plane or a train besides vaccinated people and put them at risk,” and claims CBC initially “started off with CBC running a story to implicate her and to paint her with a brush that looks uncomplimentary to the public.” Speaker 6 claims Canada must shift its understanding of what the is, describing it as “a state broadcaster pushing the agenda of the Liberal government of Canada.” Speaker 4 calls this “the most significant matter affecting our children today from a health perspective,” noting that authorities are “not investigating.” Speaker 2 concludes that everything emanates outward from this case involving law enforcement, the judicial system, the pharmaceutical industry, and health agencies, “how they work together, how they censored information. It all ties together to this one case, and that's what makes it so dangerous.”

I was paralyzed by the COVID-19 shot and left without proper treatment by the Canadian government. They offered me MAID instead of help. I now live with pain, spine lesions, and loss of bodily functions. I need assistance and ask for support by sharing my story on social media. Visit www.0pkayla.ca for more details, medical records, and proof that my condition was caused by the Moderna vaccine.

We have found more adverse effects than officially reported from the COVID vaccine. Serious harms and deaths are at unprecedented levels. We are committed to compensating those affected, but the financial burden should not fall on taxpayers. Our goal is to fight for justice for vaccinated individuals, expose discrimination against the unvaccinated, and reveal the truth about the COVID pandemic and vaccine safety.

I was paralyzed by the COVID-19 vaccine and left without proper treatment by the Canadian government. They offered me MAID, which is not treatment but euthanasia. I live with pain, a spinal lesion, and loss of bodily functions. I need help and ask for support by sharing my story on social media. Visit www.0pkayla.ca for more details, medical records, and a doctor's confirmation that my condition was caused by the Moderna vaccine.

Speaker 0: No compensation is available for people with legitimate vaccine injuries, as there is already a system in place through ACC for managing such cases. Speaker 1: However, many vaccine-injured individuals have been denied by ACC and are facing personal financial burdens for their treatment. The requirement of proving the injury is a high bar to meet. Speaker 2: It is not a high bar if a proper examination system is in place. If someone was fine before receiving the vaccine and experienced severe consequences afterward, it is likely caused by the vaccine. We should let an independent commissioner investigate the truth instead of arguing about it.

Carrie Sakamoto, a mother from Alberta, suffered severe Bell's palsy after her second Pfizer COVID-19 vaccine. Doctors linked her condition to the vaccine, and she received compensation. Despite facing backlash and denial of support, she continues to struggle with daily tasks due to paralysis and vertigo. Carrie relies on fundraising for therapy and medication, as her life has been drastically impacted by the vaccine injury.

The speaker received a letter from the officer's office requesting a report on the COVID response. The government accepted a certain amount of risk regarding the long-term efficacy and side effects of vaccines. There was a discussion about vaccine injuries and compensation, with one person mentioning that there is a system in place through ACC for managing such cases. The conversation then shifted to personal experiences and frustrations with the lack of acknowledgement and compensation for vaccine injuries. The speaker expressed their emotions and mentioned their involvement in the Vaccine Impact Support Network. They thanked someone for being there and admitted to rarely crying about anything.