reSee.it - Related Video Feed

The speaker claims scalps of five-month-old aborted babies were grafted onto lab rats and mice in a University of Pittsburgh study funded by NIAID, which is run by Dr. Anthony Fauci. According to the speaker, photos of baby scalps with hair growing on the backs of lab rats exist in the published study. The speaker alleges Planned Parenthood abortion providers supplied the aborted baby body parts for the experiments. The speaker asserts Dr. Fauci is responsible for the study because, as head of NIAID, he oversees how grants are spent. The speaker suggests obtaining whole scalps from fetuses indicates partial-birth abortions or live births. The speaker believes Dr. Fauci should be questioned by Congress about what his office did to ensure the grants and experiments complied with federal laws and regulations.

First speaker: Implant aborted baby parts into lab animals. You heard of that sort of research? Second speaker: We did an analysis a few years ago showing that over ninety percent of experiments with using human fetal tissue and putting them involved animals were funded by Fauci's NIAID. First speaker: Do you know where they're getting the aborted human fetal tissue? Second speaker: A lot of it is happening at colleges and universities that have affiliated hospitals that perform that procedure. First speaker: Madam Chair, I think Second speaker: we First speaker: need to look into that as well.

Speaker 0 introduces a campaign to cut government waste, specifying that deficit reduction requires cutting billions from valued programs, but eliminating pointless waste should be easy. Speaker 1 claims there has been a tremendous amount of waste and fraud in the government during the Biden administration, estimating federal government fraud at half a trillion dollars. The goal is to reduce this figure, saving taxpayer money by stopping spending on things that very few taxpayers would agree makes sense, such as transgender animal surgeries. Speaker 1 also questions why twenty million people who are definitely dead are mocked as alive in the Social Security database.

A study funded by grants from the NIAID office, run by Dr. Anthony Fauci, involved grafting scalps from 5-month-old aborted babies onto lab rats. The study aimed to see how long the scalps could keep growing. The photographs in the published study show baby scalps with growing hairs on the backs of lab rats. Planned Parenthood abortion providers claimed to have supplied the aborted baby body parts for these experiments at the University of Pittsburgh. Dr. Fauci has not been held accountable for this study, despite being responsible for overseeing the grants. It is important for him to answer questions about the ethical and legal compliance of these experiments in front of the United States Congress.

In 2018, we found a USDA lab right outside of Washington, D.C. that was breeding hundreds of kittens each year. They would fly to places like China, purchase dog and cat meat from wet markets, and then transport it back to the U.S. in their carry-on luggage. They then force-fed this meat to the kittens in the lab. The project cost $52 million, and the purpose was to study if people eating dog and cat meat in China could be exposed to a specific parasite. Fortunately, the Trump administration shut down the project, and the remaining cats were adopted. What kind of person decides to conduct an experiment where you turn animals into cannibals to observe the results? How did they even get the grant for this? The person in charge of this experiment is in the USDA's Hall of Fame, which says a lot about the government's mindset.

Healthy beagles were subjected to an experimental drug and intentionally infested with disease-carrying flies, known as maximum pain experimentation. FOIA documents reveal the animals suffered greatly, being eaten and gnawed raw until infected. Dr. Fauci's budget has reached over $6 billion in annual tax-funded funding, with at least half being wasted on questionable animal experiments like these beagle tests and other maximum pain experiments. It is important to hold Fauci accountable for the significant waste and abuse, both domestically and internationally.

Gain of function research involves making a wild virus more deadly and developing a vaccine for it. Anthony Fauci received a raise for his involvement in this research. In 2014, three deadly bugs escaped from different labs in the US, leading 300 scientists to urge President Obama to shut down Fauci's gain of function research. Although Obama issued a moratorium, Fauci moved the research offshore to avoid oversight. Some projects were moved to Ukraine, Georgia, and a Chinese lab run by the military.

Doge arrived at the IRS and is now helping review government spending, starting with NASA. We're planning to slash departments by 30-40% if they can't justify their headcount and selling unused federal buildings. We've discovered taxpayer money is being used to fund things like Palestinian hip hop and bizarre animal experiments. The Department of Health and Human Services has also spent billions on cars and homes for migrants. The EPA was caught rushing to spend tax dollars on questionable projects, including a climate fund with a now-deleted board of directors page. Trump's administration is offering buyouts to federal workers, and 75,000 have already accepted. We're addressing government waste and fraud that has been ongoing for years. The goal is to reform and cut wasteful spending.

The worst animal testing I've encountered involved breeding kittens, forcing them to eat cat meat, and then killing them—thousands of them. The Department of Justice was also conducting live animal training exercises involving stabbing, shooting, and blowing up animals. We successfully stopped and defunded that. Additionally, NIH and Fauci-funded experiments in Tunisia involved placing dogs' heads in mesh cages filled with biting flies. These are just a few examples of the horrific, taxpayer-funded animal testing that's happening. The public is unaware of the extent of this cruelty, and if they were, they would be outraged.

The speaker introduces a campaign to cut government waste, stating that deficit reduction requires difficult choices, including cuts to valued programs. They claim there has been a tremendous amount of waste and fraud in the government during the Biden administration, estimating federal government fraud at half a trillion dollars. The goal is to reduce this figure, saving taxpayer money by stopping spending on things that very few taxpayers would agree makes sense. Examples cited include transgender animal surgeries and the presence of twenty million dead people in the Social Security database.

Biden's USAID has wasted taxpayer money on questionable projects: $1.5 million for DEI in Serbia, $2 million for sex changes in Guatemala, $6 million for tourism in Egypt, and $15 million for contraceptives in Taliban-controlled Afghanistan. This spending is alarming for American taxpayers. President Trump aims to stop such funding, addressing issues like USAID's support for Hamas. The urgency for change has never been clearer, especially after blocking funds that could aid terrorism. The backlash from Democrats and media against figures like Elon Musk shows their discomfort with these reforms. Musk's efforts align with Trump's mission to eliminate wasteful spending and restore accountability in government.

It's estimated that over $20 billion of taxpayer money is wasted annually on ineffective and inhumane animal tests. The NIH admits that animal models don't accurately predict how drugs will work in humans, leading to wasted time and money. Experiments range from injecting puppies with cocaine to putting dead turtles on treadmills. A lack of innovation, transparency, and accountability contributes to the problem. Agencies often don't report how much money is spent, how many animals are used, or what taxpayers are getting out of it. For example, cats had marbles shoved up their rectums and were electroshocked in constipation experiments. Also, over $240 million in NIH grants fund transgender animal experiments, including studies on the effects of party drugs on animals injected with testosterone and how hormones used for human gender transitions impact the size and shape of animals' genitals.

Doge started unraveling government spending, revealing allocations like $200,000,000 for transgender experiments on monkeys. This is claimed to be just the tip of the iceberg. The speaker references a map of 50,000 NGOs, alleging it was exposed as a Democratic propaganda machine with money being funneled in a circular fashion.

Speaker 0 and Speaker 1 discuss government funding for scientific and medical research, focusing on a grant referred to as a Doge grant and a series of other NSF-funded projects. The exchange opens with Speaker 0 asking, “What is a birthing person?” and presses Speaker 1 to identify who birthing people are, including whether it is another word for a woman. Speaker 1 says he is not familiar with the Doge grant and notes that he takes a position that “all kinds of government research, medical, pharmacy” should be considered, but does not clarify the term further. Speaker 0 labels the term as erasure language and asks again whether a conference titled “gender equity in the mathematical study of commutative algebra” is a valid form of government spending. Speaker 1 replies that mathematical research of all types is deserving of government support. Speaker 0 asks about “women and non binary mathematicians” as described on the National Science Foundation’s website. Speaker 1 again supports government investment in mathematics broadly, stating, “I think all kinds of government investment should be dedicated toward mathematics.” When Speaker 0 questions whether there should be any limit on spending, Speaker 1 reiterates that he is talking about Doge, and notes he is not familiar with the particular grant but supports government investment in mathematical biology. Speaker 0 introduces another grant, “TranscendentHealth, adapting an LGB plus inclusive teen pregnancy prevention program for transgender boys,” and asks whether that is a useful form of tax spending. Speaker 1 says he is not familiar with that grant but emphasizes that bench research and government investment in scientific and pharmacotherapy are important, though he does not describe the grant’s specifics. Speaker 0 then asks about “the racialized basis of trait judgments from faces,” stating it is a $500,000 NSF grant, and asks for Speaker 1’s view. Speaker 1 confirms unfamiliarity with the subject matter but again asserts that government investment in all kinds of scientific research is of utmost importance. The conversation moves to “prostate steroid therapy and cardiovascular risk in the transgender female,” with Speaker 0 pressing on the usefulness of funding. Speaker 1 maintains that government investment in scientific research is important, without further qualification. The exchange ends with Speaker 0 thanking Speaker 1 for his testimony, and Speaker 1 acknowledging appreciation for the opportunity to testify.

Animal testing is purportedly needed to see how humans interact with drugs, find cures for diseases, and identify pharmaceutical side effects. However, some argue that animal and human bodies are too different to justify these experiments. It is claimed that the idea that we need to "poison puppies" to get cures for humans is fear mongering. Data from the NIH, Defense Department, and FDA allegedly shows that 90-99% of drugs fail in humans after being safe and effective in animal tests because animal tests don't accurately predict human reactions. Pharmaceutical companies supposedly lament being forced by the FDA and EPA to experiment on animals, as it doesn't provide useful data. RFK Jr. stated that the FDA is working to reduce animal testing because AI and other modern technologies are more accurate at predicting human reactions. The speaker asserts that animal testing continues due to bureaucracy, institutional inertia, and because it's a profitable business.

Animal testing is purportedly needed to see how humans interact with drugs and to find cures for diseases. However, the similarities between animal and human bodies are vastly different, so there may not be scientific justification for these experiments. It is argued that it is fear mongering to suggest that animal torture is needed for human cures. Data from the NIH, Defense Department, and FDA show that 90-99% of drugs fail in humans after being safe and effective in animal tests because animal tests don't accurately predict human reactions. Pharmaceutical companies lament being forced to experiment on animals because it doesn't provide useful data. RFK mentioned an FDA initiative to reduce animal testing, finding that AI and other modern technologies are more accurate at predicting human reactions. Mice and rats are not similar enough to humans to provide relevant data. Animal testing continues due to bureaucracy, institutional inertia, and because it's a profitable industry.

New evidence suggests that Dr. Anthony Fauci may have been involved in bringing a coronavirus strain to the US before the pandemic. Documents reveal that in 2018, Fauci's team visited the Wuhan lab, obtained a virus, and transported it to a lab in America. They also took Egyptian fruit bats from a Maryland zoo to Montana and combined them with the coronavirus. Despite this, Fauci acted surprised when the virus started spreading. The White Coat Waste Project claims that Fauci has a history of experimenting on animals and warns that funding for more bat labs is being allocated from COVID relief funds. The nominee for the National Institutes of Health (NIH) supports gain of function experiments and funding for labs in China and other unaccountable nations. The focus should be on exposing these labs and holding those responsible accountable.

It's estimated that over $20 billion of taxpayer money is wasted annually on ineffective and inhumane animal tests. The NIH admits that animal models fail to mimic disease or predict drug effectiveness in humans, yet billions continue to be poured into these tests. Experiments range from injecting puppies with cocaine to putting dead turtles on treadmills. A lack of innovation, transparency, and accountability exacerbates the problem. Agencies often don't report how much money is spent, how many animals are used, or what taxpayers are getting out of it. For example, taxpayer-funded cat experiments involved shoving marbles up cats' rectums and electroshocking them. We've also identified over $240 million in NIH grants for transgender animal experiments, including studies on the effects of party drugs on animals injected with testosterone and how hormones impact animal genitalia.

If COVID-19 originated from risky experiments at the Wuhan lab, it's important to note that the lab received funding from America. During a congressional hearing, Senator Paul questioned Dr. Fauci about the NIH's funding of gain-of-function research in Wuhan, to which Fauci denied lying. However, a scientific paper from 2012 written by Fauci supports the benefits of gain-of-function research despite the risk of a pandemic. The decision to lift the ban on gain-of-function research during the Trump administration remains unclear. Former President Trump mentioned that Fauci did not inform him about the Wuhan Institute of Virology's activities, and emails later revealed Fauci's discussions about the possibility of genetic manipulation. Trump stopped the payments to the Chinese lab upon discovering them. Despite the controversy, Trump believes his administration did a great job with the vaccine and Operation Warp Speed.

Speaker 0 highlights that the report indicates the federal government wasted millions in the past year on transgender animal experiments and lab testing beagles in China, noting a contrast with funds used for voting identification. He frames the issue as a question of priorities: we don’t want to pay for people to have an ID to vote, but we’ll pay for lab testing beagles in China. Speaker 1 responds by acknowledging the presence of extensive federal spending and the need for greater oversight. He says this is the ninth year they have worked through this, and that there is always a need for more eyes on it and greater transparency. He emphasizes that the problem is not confined to a single administration or Congress, but rather that there is broad complexity requiring scrutiny and sunshine. Speaker 1 identifies the shutdown as the largest area of waste in the prior year, stating that $85,000,000,000 was lost during that period. He argues that shutdowns do have real fiscal impacts, countering a common belief that they do not affect outcomes. He then points to a specific critique: a quarter of a billion dollars was spent on transitioning mice and monkeys by NIH. He claims that American taxpayers do not want their dollars spent on such activities, and reiterates that taxpayers are more supportive of spending on national defense, education, and infrastructure, but not on what he describes as wasteful or inappropriate expenditures. Across the exchange, the speakers stress the overarching theme of government spending that does not align with the public’s perceived priorities. They emphasize the need for oversight and accountability, highlighting large-scale waste associated with shutdowns and specific research expenditures. The dialogue centers on contrasting perceived essential investments with expenditures they describe as wasteful or misaligned with taxpayer priorities, especially in the context of animal research and international laboratory activities.

A study grafted scalps from five-month-old aborted babies onto lab rats and mice to observe their growth, with photographs documenting baby hairs growing on the rats' backs. According to the speaker, Planned Parenthood provided the aborted baby body parts for these experiments at the University of Pittsburgh. The speaker claims the study was funded by grants from the NIAID office, headed by Dr. Anthony Fauci, who is therefore responsible for ensuring ethical and legal compliance in the use of these grants. The speaker suggests that obtaining intact scalps from five-month-old aborted babies implies partial-birth abortions or live births. The speaker believes Dr. Fauci should be questioned by Congress regarding his office's oversight of these experiments and their compliance with federal laws and regulations.

The speaker discussed efforts to realign the government, mentioning the cancellation of several contracts at the US Department of Agriculture. One $300,000 contract was canceled in San Francisco that was for educating queer and transgender farmers on food justice. A similar contract in New York educating transgender and queer farmers on food justice and food equality was also canceled. Additionally, a $600,000 contract in Louisiana studying the menstrual cycles of transgender men was canceled. Another contract with a university focused on diversity, equity, and inclusion in the pest management industry was also canceled. The speaker stated that these contracts were nonsensical uses of taxpayer dollars and are a few examples of many that have been found.

For those familiar with the technology, it was clear from the start that certain projects were a "horrible idea," a sentiment now echoed by HHS Secretary Kennedy, who states they are not effective. The de-investment in 22 projects is just the beginning and will reunify the MAHA and MAGA movements. This action will benefit public health by preventing the implementation of this technology in people's bodies. While some funding, contracts, and research opportunities remain, the de-investment sends a clear message: this technology is not for human use.

An investigation into the National Institutes of Health (NIH) under Dr. Anthony Fauci's leadership reveals potentially unlawful actions. In 2018, the NIH infected 12 bats with a SARS-like virus called WIV one at a Montana lab. The virus was obtained from the Wuhan lab suspected to be the source of COVID-19. The experiment aimed to determine if the virus would cause infection in bats, but the research found limited evidence of replication. US taxpayer money was used for these experiments, with at least 7 US entities providing NIH grant money to labs in China. The investigation was brought to light by the White Coat Waste Project, which aims to stop funding dangerous animal experiments. They are now using the Freedom of Information Act to request more details.

The administration ended the Biden administration's policy of allowing men into women's sports and spaces. Schools and universities will lose federal funds if they allow men to invade women's sports and spaces. The Department of Justice is coordinating with law enforcement to fight child abuse in schools. It is child abuse to change a child's gender, particularly without informing the parents. The administration is sending a message to hospital systems that they cannot use taxpayer dollars to perform chemical castrations and sexual mutilations of children. Castration surgeries, castration drugs, and sterilization treatments of children are barbaric, violate medical ethics, and harm children for life. The Department of Health and Human Services, along with the Department of Justice, is making clear to medical providers and hospital systems that they cannot use taxpayer dollars to perform these procedures on children. HHS has eliminated the "junk, fake science" that promoted sex changes and sterilization of children and is issuing new guidance advising doctors and hospitals against performing these "horrifying" and "irreversible" procedures.