TruthArchive.ai - Related Video Feed

Elon endorsed the speaker and campaigned for them. The speaker believes they would have won Pennsylvania easily, even if the "real governor" or Shapiro had run. The speaker is disappointed because Elon, who initially knew the bill's inner workings and had no problem with it, suddenly developed a problem when he learned about the EV mandate cut. This cut would save billions of dollars but is considered unfair. The speaker wants cars of all types, including electric, gasoline, combustion, and hybrids, and wants to be able to sell everything. Elon became "different" when Congress wanted to cut the EV mandate, which the speaker understands. Elon knew every aspect of the bill better than almost anybody.

The speaker asks the senator his opinion on violence against Tesla products. The speaker specifically asks if the senator denounces the violence against Tesla products, dealerships, and cars. The senator responds that he can't talk about Tesla, but that Elon Musk is a disaster for America, and America knows it. The speaker then thanks the senator.

Speaker 0 suggests Speaker 1 is aligned with President Trump and has identified over $100 billion in government waste, fraud, and abuse. Speaker 1 responds that people whose fraudulent money is taken away get upset and want to harm him and Tesla because he is stopping government corruption. He attributes this to "bad people" doing "bad things." Speaker 0 expresses concern that those hurt by these actions will be dealership employees and Tesla factory workers, which he finds despicable due to perceived political differences.

The speaker expresses disappointment in Elon, claiming Elon knew the details of a bill "better than almost anybody" and initially had no problem with it. The speaker suggests Elon's problem arose when the EV mandate was cut, costing billions. The speaker wants various car types available, including electric, gasoline combustion, and hybrids. The speaker claims Elon made positive statements about them previously. The speaker states they helped Elon a lot. A second speaker asks if Elon raised concerns privately before making them public.

The speaker initially admired Elon Musk, comparing him to Iron Man. However, the speaker's view changed as Musk seemed obsessed with power and aligned himself with the extreme far right. The "pinnacle" of this shift was the Nazi salute incident, after which the speaker decided to no longer support Musk. The speaker urges potential Tesla buyers to avoid funding extremism and societal division by not purchasing Tesla vehicles.

The speaker believes they would have easily won Pennsylvania, and is disappointed in Elon, who initially endorsed them and knew the details of a bill. Elon only developed a problem with the bill when the EV mandate was cut due to its high cost. The speaker wants cars of all types to be available, including electric, gasoline combustion, and hybrids. Elon knew every aspect of the bill and initially had no problem with it. The speaker helped Elon a lot. The speaker clarifies that Elon did not raise concerns privately before going public. The speaker believes Elon misses being in the Oval Office and that people who leave the administration sometimes become hostile due to "Trump derangement syndrome" or missing the glamour.

The speaker says he has always liked Elon Musk and is surprised by Musk's criticism regarding the bill. He would rather Musk criticize him than the bill because the bill is incredible, with $1.6 trillion in cuts, the biggest tax cut in history. The bill includes unbelievable benefits for small businesses, people, and middle-income individuals. Musk is upset because the EV mandate, which provided a lot of money for electric vehicles, was removed. Electric vehicle companies are having a hard time and want billions of dollars in subsidies. The speaker claims Musk knew about this from the beginning, and it hasn't changed.

The speaker is confused that people who advocate for electric vehicles are now burning them. The speaker says these are the same people who have been trying to force people to buy electric vehicles and eradicate gas cars, citing environmental concerns like emissions and pollution. The speaker suggests that the reason for the vehicle burning is a protest against the electric vehicle manufacturer, who is revealing government waste of taxpayer money. The speaker states that the situation doesn't make sense.

The speaker asks the senator his opinion on violence against Tesla products. The speaker asks if the senator denounces the violence against Tesla products, dealerships, and cars. The senator responds that he can't talk about Tesla, but that Elon Musk is a disaster for America, and America knows it.

Democrats may have alienated Elon Musk on a personal level by failing to celebrate his achievements, such as Starlink and private space endeavors. One speaker believes Democrats should have celebrated Musk's contributions to electric vehicles, even though he opposed unionization. Musk was reportedly offended when he wasn't invited to an EV summit. One speaker called the White House to inquire, and was told the union issue was likely the reason for the snub. The speaker felt he deserved credit and should have been invited. One speaker thinks Musk should stay off Twitter, but also notes that he was once an Obama supporter. Democrats should remember their history of celebrating innovation and entrepreneurship.

We got a lot of hostages back, but we're gonna talk about you. I've been watching. We might have to put Doze on Elon. Doge is the monster that might have to go back and eat Elon. Elon's very upset that the EV mandate is gonna be terminated. Not everybody wants an electric car. I wanna have maybe gasoline, maybe electric, maybe someday a hydrogen. If you have a hydrogen car, it has one problem: it blows up. I'm gonna let Peter test it off.

The speaker expresses disapproval of Elon Musk, citing concerns about his behavior and influence. They claim Musk makes Nazi salutes, is being sued for sole child custody due to lack of involvement, and appears high at the White House due to severe drug addiction. The speaker contrasts Musk with Bill Gates, alleging Musk isn't using his wealth to help people. They believe Musk is off the rails, rabidly addicted to drugs, and using his power to influence elections. The speaker predicts Musk's legacy will be unnecessary death, disease, and disability for the world's most vulnerable, not innovation. They state that his behavior is not what it means to be an innovator, an American, or a man.

Elon endorsed me and campaigned for me, and I would have easily won Pennsylvania, even against Shapiro. Elon knew the bill's inner workings better than anyone and initially had no problem with it. His problem arose when the EV mandate was cut due to its cost. I want cars of all types, including electric, gasoline combustion, and hybrids. Elon knew every aspect of the bill and only developed a problem after the cut. He previously said beautiful things about me. I'm disappointed in Elon, as I've helped him a lot. He worked hard and did a good job, but I think he misses the Oval Office. People leave my administration and initially love us, but then they miss it and sometimes become hostile. It's like Trump derangement syndrome. They wake up and the glamour is gone, and they become hostile.

The speaker claims a previously "great relationship" with Elon has soured due to disagreements over the "great big beautiful bill." He asserts the bill, featuring the "biggest tax cuts in history," will generate a surplus if tariff revenue is included, citing a minimum of $2.8 trillion over ten years, even according to the "Democrat"-run CBO. He touts low inflation (around 2%) and falling gasoline and grocery prices (specifically eggs), attributing past high inflation to the Biden administration's energy policies. The border is now "the best in the history of our country," with only a few legal entrants recently. The speaker expresses disappointment in Elon's changed stance on the bill, suggesting it stemmed from cuts to the EV mandate, which Elon previously understood and supported. He speculates that people who leave his administration often become "hostile" due to missing the "glamour" and "beautiful Oval Office."

The speaker observes Democrats on TV repeatedly mentioning Elon Musk and expresses enjoyment at this. The speaker finds it amusing that the focus of anger is on Musk, who allegedly exposed fraud, rather than on those who purportedly wasted taxpayer money. The speaker suggests that Congress is unable to cut the budget and thanks Elon Musk for doing their job for them.

We got a lot of hostages back, but we're gonna talk about y'all. I've been watching. We might have to put Doze on Elon. Doge is the monster that might have to go back and eat Elon. Elon's very upset that the EV mandate is gonna be terminated. Not everybody wants an electric car. I wanna have maybe gasoline, maybe electric, maybe someday a hydrogen. If you have a hydrogen car, it has one problem: it blows up. I'm gonna let Peter test it off.

Speaker 0 states that rhetoric makes politicians less than human. Speaker 1 believes Democrats lost Elon Musk because they didn't celebrate his contributions to electric vehicles, Starlink, and private space endeavors, even though he was against unionization. Speaker 2 says he received a call from Musk about not being invited to an EV summit and called the White House to ask why. He felt Musk should have been invited and that the union issue was the reason for the snub. Speaker 1 agrees he deserved credit. Speaker 1 thinks Musk should stay off Twitter and not make jokes about the Vice President. Speaker 1 says Democrats should remember that Musk supported Obama and that the Democratic party should be about innovation and entrepreneurship.

The speaker believes Doge might "eat Elon." Elon is obsessed with the potential termination of the EV mandate. The speaker states that not everyone wants an electric car, including themselves. They express a preference for gasoline, electric, hybrid, or hydrogen cars. The speaker notes that hydrogen cars have a problem: they explode.

An individual states that someone is working to help the blind see and asks if the work comes down to aligning with President Donald Trump to identify over $100 billion in government waste, fraud, and abuse. The speaker responds that people get upset when fraudulently obtained money is taken away, and that they want to harm him for stopping their fraud and want to hurt Tesla for stopping government waste and corruption. The speaker concludes that bad people will do bad things. The first individual states that those who will end up hurt are the people who work in dealerships and those who build Teslas, which is despicable on the part of those who may have a political difference.

The speaker claims to have had a great relationship with Elon, but is now disappointed. He believes Elon only developed a problem with the "great big beautiful bill" after the EV mandate was cut, which Elon knew about and initially supported. The speaker says the CBO, which is run by Democrats, projects a $2.8 trillion surplus over ten years if tariff revenue is included. He touts low inflation, down to 2%, and falling grocery and gasoline prices. He also claims the U.S. now has the best border in history with a 99.99% success rate. He speculates that people who leave his administration miss the "glamour" and become hostile, possibly due to "Trump derangement syndrome." He suggests that Elon may be experiencing something similar.

Elon and the speaker had a great relationship, though the current status is uncertain. The speaker recalls a wonderful send-off where Elon said very nice and the "best" things. Elon wore the hat. The speaker believes Trump was right about everything. The speaker also believes they are right about the "great big beautiful bill," which they describe as the biggest tax cuts in history and the biggest economic development moves anywhere. They claim nothing like it has ever been done before.

A person states that they and their husband drive Teslas. They learned that a friend is being disowned and uninvited from gatherings by friends and family simply for driving a Tesla. The speaker emphasizes that owning a Tesla is not a political statement or an attempt to impose beliefs on others. The friend is facing social consequences solely because of the car they drive.

Speaker 0 expresses disappointment in Elon, stating, "I've helped Elon a lot." Speaker 1 asks if Elon raised concerns privately before making them public and questions whether Elon should be taken seriously about spending cuts, given his role in that area. Speaker 0 responds that Elon worked hard and did a good job, suggesting Elon misses his former position, noting the unique appeal of the Oval Office.

Elon is a patriot who is saving America and has been unfairly treated. He supported me in the election and has never asked me for anything. I got rid of the electric car mandate, which might not be good for him. I got activated last week when I saw what they're doing to him and decided to support him because he makes an incredible product. Pam has done a great job with the investigations and has already found four of them. Those people are terrorists at a high level, and the people financing them are in big trouble and better cut it out.

The speaker expresses their initial support for Tesla and their belief that they understood the company well. They criticize the decision to rescind Elon Musk's pay package, calling it unfair and un-American. They also discuss the impact this decision may have on compensation and company governance. The speaker believes that this will discourage talented entrepreneurs and lead to less innovative companies. They mention a small shareholder who sued Musk over the pay package, highlighting the disparity between the gains made by other investors and the potential loss for this shareholder. Another speaker agrees that the deal was beneficial for both Musk and shareholders, and that most CEOs would not take on such a risk-based compensation structure.