TruthArchive.ai - Related Video Feed

The speaker discusses the CDC leadership, confirming 'we let go of Susan Menarie yesterday' and that the agency is 'a very troubled for a very long time' with 'bizarre recommendations that were not science based' during the COVID pandemic. They say 'Go to the website. Look at it. Fluorination, giving kids a toxin, and vaccines.' They add, 'There's a lot of trouble at CDC, and it's going to require getting rid of some people over the long term in order for us to change the institutional culture and bring back pride and self esteem and make that agency the stellar agency that it's always been.' They conclude, 'I'm very confident in the political staff that we have down there now that they're gonna be able to accomplish that and and ensure the competent functionality of that agency.'

If we're gonna make America healthy again, we can't allow public health to be undermined. So could you explain what steps you're gonna be taking to ensure vaccine guidance is clear, evidence based, and trustworthy? We're going to make it clear evidence based and trustworthy for the first time in history. Only one of those 19 vaccines, 92 doses, only one of those vaccines has ever been tested against an inert placebo. And what we're doing now is any new vaccine that before it's approved and licensed will have to show demonstrate safety against inert placebo. And we're going to go back and do observational studies on the existing vaccines to see if they're linked to any of these chronic disease epidemics so that people can understand the risk profile of those products and make good assessments for their own health.

The speaker claims to have witnessed a humanitarian catastrophe with millions of deaths worldwide due to vaccines. In their private practice, they've seen almost 1500 patients, previously healthy, now disabled and suffering years later, believing they are addressing the greatest unmet need in the country: care for the vaccine-injured. The speaker believes the government has been fully captured by corporations and industrial complexes. They allege that agencies like the CDC, FDA, NIH, and EPA, along with big food, are polluting air, water, and medicines. They also claim the government is allowing immigrants in, surveilling and censoring citizens, and stripping away rights, with most of the country unaware. The speaker states their goal is to educate people about this and "rescue the republic."

The Chinese mafia is exploiting rural America to create a drug empire, purchasing churches and schools, stealing electricity, using foreign pesticides, and colluding with Mexican cartels. The speaker claims that opposition to his program as Secretary of Health and Human Services comes from the mainstream media and Democrats, who reflexively oppose anything associated with Trump. Trump dictates the Democratic Party platform; Democrats now support positions they previously opposed simply because Trump opposes them. The CDC's epidemiological studies on autism used fraudulent techniques and failed to compare outcomes in vaccinated versus unvaccinated groups. The speaker will conduct new studies, making the databases public for independent scientists. Initial answers should be available by September, with definitive answers in six months. People should not blindly trust experts but do their own research. The speaker will publish study protocols, peer reviews, and raw data, requiring replication of every study. Scientific journals have become propaganda vessels for pharmaceutical companies, incentivizing cheating. Doctors are pressured to prioritize revenue over patient care, creating a system where everyone profits from sickness. Pharmaceutical companies are the biggest source of revenue for media companies, buying protection. Pharmaceutical advertising should be more honest. The speaker is looking at ways to enlarge the vaccine injury compensation program so that COVID vaccine-injured people can be compensated. The recommendations now are children 18 are not recommended to get the vaccine, but they can get it if they want. The Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ASIP) was a sock puppet for the industry it was supposed to regulate, with members having undisclosed conflicts of interest. The speaker fired the board. Fauci was vulnerable and had a lot of liability on creating coronavirus. The speaker thinks there should be a truth commission. The speaker believes his uncle was killed by a conspiracy. The speaker is confident that Trump will release anything that he has access to. The speaker loves the people that he's working with at this agency. Trump's cabinet has put together an extraordinary cabinet. Trump knows how to pick talent.

I'm deeply honored by the nomination for NIH director. The NIH is the crown jewel of American biomedical sciences, but post-pandemic, American confidence in science has declined. If confirmed, my goals are to refocus NIH research on solving America's chronic disease crisis, ensure NIH-supported science is replicable and reliable, and establish a culture of respect for free speech and scientific dissent. The NIH must recommit to funding the most innovative biomedical research possible and embrace transparency while vigorously regulating risky research that could cause a pandemic. I will work with congress to guarantee that. I respect the work and mission of the NIH. I will carry out President Trump's agenda of making the public science institutions of this country worthy of trust and serve to make America healthy again.

Secretary, the CDC director was fired after refusing to resign as her lawyers accuse you, sir, of putting millions of American lives at risk as a CDC vaccine chief slammed in a resignation post. “I'm not gonna comment. It would be inappropriate for me to comment on a personnel issue.” “What I will say is, you know, there's president president Trump Trump has has very, very ambitious hopes for what for CDC right now.” “The CDC has problems.” “You know, we saw the misinformation coming out of COVID.” “They got the testing testing wrong. Wrong.” “They got the the social distancing, the masks, the the school closures that did so much harm to the American people.” “Oh, today on CDC's website right now, they list the 10 top top advance the the 10 greatest advances in medical science, and one of them is abortion. The other is another is floridation.” “Another is vaccines.” “So we need to look at the priorities of the agency if there's really a deeply, deeply embedded, I would say, malaise at the agency.” “And we need strong leadership that will go in there and that will be able to execute on president Trump's broad ambitions.”

Trump has asked me to reorganize the federal health agencies, the agencies that have a portfolio that affects human health, which is CDC, NIH, c d FDA, as well as some of the agencies within the United States Department of Agriculture. He’s asked me to clean up the corruption, number one. He’s asked me to end the conflicts of interest, return those agencies to their rich tradition of gold standard empirically based evidence based science, evidence based medicine, and to end the chronic disease epidemic in this country. And he’s asked me specifically to measurably reduce chronic disease in our children within two years. Okay.

Paul Offit said that I'm going to do everything I can to make vaccines less available and affordable, which will hurt the vaccine infrastructure in this country. I'm supposedly joining hands with Donald Trump to march into measles land. But I'm not going to take away anyone's vaccines. People should be able to get them if they want. I want to give people good science. We don't have good safety studies on almost any of the 72 vaccines mandated for children. HHS admitted there are no pre-licensing safety studies for any of them, except the COVID vaccine. We need to know the risk profiles of these products. We also don't have good data on adverse effects from the COVID vaccine, which is a crime. The CDC's surveillance system captures less than one percent of vaccine injuries. Congress and the National Academy of Sciences have repeatedly ordered the CDC to put together a better vaccine. We will do that right away.

I serve on the FDA's vaccine advisory committee because I don't have relationships with pharmaceutical companies, as that would be a conflict of interest. I actually agree with some of the things my counterpart says, such as we are too obese as a country, and we overmedicate our children. I wrote a book about this called Overkill When Modern Medicine Goes Too Far. However, I don't agree with claims that vaccines are harmful, as has been said. RFK Jr. continues to claim that vaccines cause autism, which is untrue, and he's now targeting childhood vaccines, which will only hurt children.

The speaker states that Trump has asked him to reorganize the federal health agencies whose portfolios affect human health, specifically the CDC, NIH, FDA, and some USDA agencies. The goals are to clean up corruption, end conflicts of interest, and return these agencies to their “rich tradition of gold standard empirically based evidence based science, evidence based medicine.” He adds a aim to end the chronic disease epidemic in the country, with a specific request to measurably reduce chronic disease in children within two years.

It doesn't matter who comes before us as long as they support this administration and ignore your beliefs. If your views are fundamental, how do you reconcile that? President Trump tasked me with ending the chronic disease epidemic and making America healthy again. This is my primary focus at HHS. If we don't tackle this issue, all other discussions about healthcare funding are irrelevant. The U.S. has the highest chronic disease burden globally, and during COVID, we accounted for 16% of deaths despite having only 4.2% of the world’s population. The average American who died from COVID had multiple chronic diseases. This situation poses an existential threat to our economy, military, and overall well-being, making it a top priority for President Trump. If confirmed, I will address this challenge directly.

I will comply with all ethical guidelines. However, you are implying that I should not challenge backseat decisions. As Secretary of HHS, Robert Kennedy could undermine vaccines and their manufacturing, potentially profiting while risking children's health. I support vaccines and the childhood schedule, but I prioritize good science. You should clarify that Kennedy has undergone the same ethics review as other nominees and has signed an ethics letter regarding conflicts of interest. While concerns about his financial interests are raised, he has complied with all applicable laws. I cannot confirm if any previous nominee has made millions from suing entities they would regulate, but all nominees face scrutiny over their financial interests, and Kennedy has met the necessary requirements.

I defend public health leaders and question why cuts are bad for health at HHS. Distrust stems from conflicts of interest, like Dr. Offit taking money from pharmaceutical companies while recommending drugs. He claims science is settled, yet approved vaccines have been recalled. I want focus on real issues: 38% of children having prediabetes. Measles deaths were high before vaccines, but chronic conditions are a bigger threat now. RFK Jr. isn't anti-vaccine but wants vaccine studies. I question why media covers measles over obesity and diabetes. Sixteen percent of COVID deaths were American, but the CDC didn't discuss metabolic links. I support measures like removing soda from SNAP, aiming for better health policies. Pharma profits from sick children, incentivizing chronic disease.

I want to clarify my stance on vaccines. First, vaccines, like all drugs, have side effects that can harm some individuals. There's no vaccine that is universally safe and effective for everyone. Vaccine injuries deserve attention, just like rare diseases. The public health community has often ignored concerns about vaccine side effects, which is disappointing. I believe vaccine manufacturers should be held legally accountable for their products, as they currently have immunity from lawsuits. Additionally, individuals must have the freedom to choose what goes into their bodies. The Nuremberg Code emphasizes informed consent, which is crucial. As president, I will ensure vaccines are safer, hold the industry accountable, and protect personal choice. If you support these ideas, visit Kennedy24.com to learn more about my plans.

"we'll we'll find an incredible nominee. I'm not worried about that at all." "the CDC's credibility was shattered during the COVID era." "This is now widely understood and widely acknowledged." "CDC used to be, of course, or seen widely around the world as a premier health agency." "Secretary Kennedy, one of the world's foremost voices, advocates, experts on public health, is working hard to restore the credibility and the integrity of CDC." "It is an honor to be able to work with secretary Kennedy as he tackles these issues on behalf of president Trump." "Secretary Kennedy has been a crown jewel of this administration who's working tirelessly to improve public health for all Americans and, again, to deal with the drivers of the chronic health crisis in this country."

I'm preparing to shake up the Department of Health and Human Services by dismissing vaccine advisors with conflicts of interest. The medical industry has undue influence over regulators and government policy. We aim to remove conflicts of interest from committees and research partners or balance them with other stakeholders. The CDC's Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices is a clear target, and their meeting was recently postponed indefinitely. Medical professionals have urged me to preserve the meeting, emphasizing the importance of vaccines in responding to public health threats. Panels advising the FDA are also being targeted. I've vowed to reassess the childhood vaccination schedule and suggested that certain vaccines, like the COVID-19 vaccines, could be taken off the market. The CDC has already withdrawn its "wild to mild seasonal" campaign for the flu vaccination.

Trump has tasked me with reorganizing federal health agencies like the CDC, NIH, FDA, and some USDA agencies. The goals are to eliminate corruption, resolve conflicts of interest, and restore these agencies to their tradition of evidence-based science and medicine. Additionally, there is a focus on addressing the chronic disease epidemic in the country, with a specific aim to significantly reduce chronic diseases in children within two years.

the corruption of science, which I believe you just said. That is almost your number one goal. Right? Is try to bring integrity and credibility back to science, which has been corrupted by the people who pay for it, by federal health agencies being captured by pharmaceutical industries, by big pharma, by big food. In 02/2002, CDC did an internal study of Atlanta, Fulton County, Georgia children looked at children who got the MLR vaccine on time and compared those to kids who got them later. The data from that study showed that black boys who got the vaccine on time had a two sixty percent greater chance of getting an autism diagnosis than children who waited. The chief scientist on that, Doctor. William Thompson, the senior vaccine safety science at CDC, was ordered to come into a room with four other co authors by his boss, Frank DeStefano, who’s the head of the immunization safety press, ordered to destroy that data. And then they published it without that fact. It happens all the time. We are being lied to by these agencies. And we're going to change that right now.

I'm asking if you will agree not to sue drug companies. I'm not agreeing to that. As secretary of HHS, you could influence lawsuits in many ways, such as promoting anti-vaccine views, appointing like-minded individuals, or changing vaccine schedules and compensation rules. You could even share FDA data with law firms for their benefit. I'm asking you to commit not to financially benefit from these lawsuits while serving as secretary. I will comply with ethical guidelines. You're trying to undermine vaccines. As secretary, you could harm vaccine access while profiting from it. I support vaccines and the childhood schedule; I just want good science. Then say you won't profit from your role as secretary.

What's causing distrust in public health isn't the idea of public health itself, but the actions of its leaders. We need to address the conflicts of interest, like Dr. Offit taking millions from pharmaceutical companies while approving their products. It's also about holding people accountable when they make definitive statements about science, yet have approved products, like vaccines, that have later been recalled for causing harm. While measles is important, let's remember that before the vaccine, there were 300 deaths a year from measles. Today, we have a much bigger problem, with 38% of children having prediabetes. It is important that we focus on reorganizing the department to address issues like this, instead of being distracted.

My responsibility is to assess your trustworthiness in supporting public health. We share concerns about issues like ultra-processed food and obesity, and I understand parents want reassurance about vaccine safety and effectiveness. However, our approaches differ; I rely on the preponderance of evidence, while you seem to use selective evidence to create doubt. As a 71-year-old who has long criticized vaccines, can you change your stance now that you hold a key position in vaccine policy? Your declaration that vaccines are safe could significantly impact public trust. Politically, as a Republican from Louisiana, I want President Trump's policies to succeed. If someone remains unvaccinated due to your influence and dies from a vaccine-preventable disease, it would not only be a tragedy but also tarnish the President's legacy, which I hope to see shine.

Trump has asked me to reorganize the federal health agencies—the CDC, NIH, FDA, and some USDA agencies—that have a portfolio affecting human health. He wants me to clean up the corruption, end the conflicts of interest, and return these agencies to their tradition of gold standard empirically based, evidence-based science and evidence-based medicine. He also asked me to end the chronic disease epidemic in this country and, specifically, to measurably reduce chronic disease in our children within two years.

As I start my work here at HHS, I want to address both my supporters and the American public. We all know that America faces unprecedented levels of chronic disease, obesity, and addiction. While we can't be certain of the causes, finding them and acting on them will be my top priority. In our first 100 days, we will examine every possible factor, listen to experts, dissidents, insiders, and the public, leaving no stone unturned. We will investigate our food, medicine, water, lifestyles, and environment with an open mind. We must care more about our children's health than being right or financial profit. We will bring transparency to our health agencies, eliminating conflicts of interest and prioritizing honest science. After identifying the causes of chronic disease, we will reverse it. With your help, and President Trump's support, we can unify to solve this problem.

RFK Jr.'s potential role as HHS secretary is framed around three goals: The target is to clean up the corruption. Number two, get back to science based evidence. And number three, end chronic disease, which is a pretty big goal. The speaker notes pushback from big food, chemical, and pharma companies who really don't like him. He cites a counterargument: 'there is no clear evidence yet that disease is caused by processed food.' You know how ridiculous that sounds? This, this. It's not linked to chronic disease. What does cause disease? And their response is, we don't know. We need to do more research.

As Secretary of HHS, you could influence lawsuits related to vaccines in several ways. You might publish anti-vaccine views on government letterhead, appoint like-minded individuals to vaccine panels, or instruct the CDC to remove specific vaccines from schedules. Additionally, you could alter compensation programs to expose manufacturers to lawsuits, expand eligibility for compensation without causal evidence, and modify vaccine court processes to facilitate frivolous lawsuits. You could also share FDA data with law firms for their benefit, change vaccine labeling, and adjust claims in the vaccine injury compensation program. I urge you to commit to not having a financial stake in these lawsuits to avoid conflicts of interest. I will comply with all ethical guidelines. That's not the question. You are implying I should not serve in vaccine-related roles. No one should be misled here.