reSee.it - Related Video Feed

The talk argues for deflating a parasitic system composed of big government and large corporations by promoting local, independent living. It claims that growing, preparing, fermenting, storing, foraging, hunting food and medicine, living off grid, swapping with local communities, and avoiding big government and big corporations creates deflation that destroys inflation, corruption, and power abuse by elites who extract money and power. The speaker urges “deflating the parasitic big government and corp” more and more. The central premise is that people must stop feeding large-scale states and companies and instead live independently locally; otherwise decay recurs because large states and corporations are parasitic and destructive due to their excessive scale. A healthy parasite-host relationship, the argument goes, would require the parasite to remain subordinate and non-destructive toward its host. Large-scale systems “rise above and destroy their many hosts until the entire system collapses,” characterizing elites and their parasitic system as an overarching multi-host cancer that drains the life from common people, amplified by parasitic sociopathic elites and enabled by large-scale systems. The NJAM is presented as a more gradual return to local, independent living, or a collapse with substantial suffering. Reasons given for parasitism by large states and corporations include the opportunity their excessive scale provides to siphon wealth from the grassroots and concentrate it upward, creating an increasingly extreme parasitic sociopathic elite. The speaker asserts that seeking justice through courts within this system will fail because those courts are part of the parasitic monster; thus, the remedy is to starve the parasitic monster and feed oneself, one’s household, and the local community instead. A call is issued to “Brace yourselves in Belgium.” Specific data are cited to support the claim that the system is set to deflate by itself. The Belgian national debt for 2024 is described in billions of euros, with figures: “Federal Janapr, plus 29.6 to 534.89, sub governments, plus 22%, 652.57, equals 113% of bbp. Extrapolation 2024, plus 108.3 to 724.79, = 125% of BBP.” The speaker concludes, therefore, to “deflate the parasitic system even more.” The message ends with a reference to Source2mia.org and a request to like and follow.

The speaker claims that the investigation against them is a witch hunt by the political system, specifically Washington and Biden. They state that they didn't need the loans and had plenty of cash, which was paid off. They criticize the attorney general for pursuing the case, suggesting it is politically motivated. The speaker also mentions other similar cases and accuses the system of being corrupt. They express frustration with the situation and describe it as third world country and banana republic behavior.

The speaker believes the World Economic Forum (WEF) is a "billionaire's boys club" that shifts wealth upward and imposes totalitarian controls. They claim the WEF influences countries to erode constitutional and civil rights. The speaker states that during COVID, $4 trillion of health was shifted upward, small businesses were closed, and Google colluded to censor those who complained.

Speaker 0 expresses their opinion about eating at Carrefour and accuses the government of being influenced by the Rothschild bank. They believe that Emmanuel Macron, who used to work for Rothschild, is serving their interests. The speaker questions the government's motives and suggests that everyone already knows the truth.

EDF is facing financial difficulties, so the speaker supports its renationalization. They believe that privatization should only happen when a company is doing well. The speaker also wants EDF to merge with Enedis and disconnect from the European market's pricing system, which is causing small businesses to struggle. They mention petitions signed by thousands of entrepreneurs who are struggling financially. The speaker emphasizes that this issue is important and calls for support. They give examples of companies like Michelin, whose electricity bills have skyrocketed, and warn that if the situation continues, companies may relocate outside of France. The speaker points out that Spain and Portugal have disconnected from the pricing system and have reasonable electricity prices.

The transcript presents a call to deflate what is described as a parasitic system consisting of big government and large corporations. The speaker, identified as Speaker 0, advocates growing, preparing, fermenting, storing, foraging, hunting one’s own food and medicine, living off grid, and swapping with local communities as a strategy to reduce dependence on centralized state and corporate power. The overarching goal is to destroy inflation, corruption, and power abuse attributed to rich elites by shrinking the influence of parasitic big government and corporations. Key justification offered for deflating the system includes the belief that people must become independent locally and stop feeding large-scale states and companies, otherwise decay will reoccur. The speaker frames the relationship between host and parasite as a healthy, non-destructive dynamic only when the parasite remains subordinate to the host; in contrast, large-scale states and corporations are characterized as parasitic and destructive due to their excessive scale, which purportedly allows wealth to be siphoned from grassroots to higher levels, creating an increasingly extreme parasitic sociopathic elite. The speaker contends that large-scale political and economic structures rise above and destroy their many hosts, culminating in system-wide collapse. The elites and their parasitic system are described as a “overarching multiple host cancer” that drains life from common people. The National or NJAM (as referenced by the speaker) is described as either a more gradual return to local living or a collapse accompanied by significant suffering. Because the stated reason for parasitism is the opportunity created by excessive scale to concentrate wealth upward, the remedy is to reduce scale and power. Regarding justice and governance, the speaker asserts that seeking justice from the courts of the parasitic monster (big government and corporations) is futile, comparing it to asking justice from parasites that feed on you. The proposed response is to starve the parasitic monster and instead feed oneself, one’s household, and the local community. A regional emphasis is placed on Belgium, with a call to brace for this approach there. A set of quantitative claims is provided to illustrate the deflationary argument: Belgium’s national debt for 2024 is discussed in billions of euros, with a breakdown of debt across federal and sub-government levels, producing an extrapolated 2024 figure that reaches 125% of GDP. The speaker uses these figures to support the call to deflate the parasitic system further. The source is credited to Source2mia.org, and the speaker ends with a request to like and follow.

The speaker expresses frustration with Revenue Canada's alleged aggressive actions against taxpayers, citing over 20 years of experience. They claim Revenue Canada is filing taxes for clients, leading to bankruptcy with no recourse, and that many people are unaware they can fight back. The speaker describes a client who didn't file taxes for two years due to life circumstances. Revenue Canada allegedly filed for her, assigning a $400,000 income during COVID, then imposed a $98,000 penalty and $54,000 in interest. After the speaker refiled for 2019 and 2020, Revenue Canada allegedly froze the client's bank accounts, seized her funds, and is now refusing to accept the 2019 filing. The speaker asks how many people have had their lives ruined or gone bankrupt due to Revenue Canada's actions. They claim Revenue Canada is applying rules that aren't legal, such as keeping refunds from business owners who haven't filed taxes for two years while still charging them penalties and interest if they owe money. The speaker urges people to fight back and unite against these allegedly unfair practices.

They tell us that with our money, they finance global public goods, like replanting trees in Indonesia or the Amazon. Deforestation in Brazil and Indonesia is authorized by these very states. Multinational corporations are profiting from deforestation. Then, French development agencies, authorities, President Macron, the EU, and the UN try to guilt us, holding out the begging bowl, citing climate change. Those countries and corporations profited, but they won't pay. Instead, taxpayers like you will pay. People have been paralyzed by the fear of being seen as pro-climate change, so they say nothing. But it's scandalous! Brazil, Indonesia, and the deforesting multinationals should pay, not French taxpayers. This fleecing must stop immediately.

The corporate elites met at the World Economic Forum in Davos to plan the future via a scheme called the great reset, which will drain bank accounts and strip the middle class of its equity. During COVID, the WEF dictated lockdowns that shifted $4 trillion to an oligarchy of corporate billionaires. Bankers and investment houses acquired homes, advertising that you will owe nothing and be happy. The speaker, an attorney who has fought corporate interests, claims familiarity with their impulses to commoditize lands, waters, homes, children, workers, and public health. The speaker says they have proven they can derail these schemes. Despite billions spent on propaganda to make people feel powerless, the speaker believes in the power of the people.

Speaker 0 argues for “deflating the parasitic system,” claiming that growing, preparing, fermenting, storing, foraging, hunting your own food and medicine, living off grid, swapping with your local community, and avoiding big government and big corp creates deflation and destroys inflation, corruption and power abuse with which the rich elites steal money and power. The goal is to “deflate the parasitic big government and corp” more and more. Why deflate the parasitic system? The message states that people must start living independently locally and no longer feed and support large scale states and companies; otherwise decay “just always starts over again.” It asserts that large states and companies are parasitic destructive due to their excessive scale, and that in a healthy parasite–host relationship the parasite must remain subordinate and non-destructive toward its host. The speaker describes large scale states and corporations as rising above and destroying their many hosts until the entire system collapses, characterizing the elites and their parasitic system as an overarching multiple-host cancer, sucking the life out of common people driven by parasitic sociopathic elites and by people enabling large scale systems. The NJAM is described as either a more gradual return to people living independently and locally or a collapse with a lot of suffering. The reason given for their parasitic destructive nature is the scale: excessive scale offers the opportunity to suck wealth away from the grassroots and concentrate it higher up in the system, creating an increasingly extreme parasitic sociopathic elite. The speaker claims that seeking justice from the courts of the parasitic monster, “biggolfpluscorp,” will always fail, likening it to asking justice from the parasites that feed on you. Therefore, the advised course is to “starve the parasitic monster” and instead “feed yourself, your household and your local community.” A note to “Brace yourselves in Belgium” is included. Specific economic data are cited: “Belgian national debt 2024 in billions of euros.” It lists federal Janapr (likely January) plus 29.6 to 534.89, sub-governments plus 22%, 652.57 equals 113% of bbp. Extrapolation 2024, plus 108.3 to 724.79, equals 125% of bbp. The speaker concludes, “Therefore, let's deflate the parasitic system even more.” The source is given as Source2mia.org, with a request to like and follow.

I apologize, Mr. President, but I cannot stay silent. You have broken regulated energy tariffs, liberalized the market, and created a system that demands EDF to give 25% of nuclear energy funds to its competitors. Twelve years later, they haven't invested a single euro. During the lockdown, when the free market dropped to 21 euros, they all went to court to exit. But when the market went above 40 euros after the lockdown, they came back demanding more volume. This is not consumer protection; it's organized exploitation. The CRE estimated that over 60% of regulated tariff increases were driven by alternative actors wanting to compete with EDF. This system has been exploiting EDF for 12 years, and you continue to support it. They don't even respect the contract, yet you give them more. They are sharks, always ready to feast on others' expense.

The speaker raises concerns about the high price of electricity for French entrepreneurs. Despite France producing nuclear electricity at a cost of fifty euros per megawatt-hour, businesses are forced to pay six to seven hundred euros per megawatt-hour. This is due to an absurd European market that links electricity prices to gas prices. The speaker blames Mr. Putin for creating a gas crisis in Europe and accuses Europe of inventing an electricity crisis. Many French businesses, including bakeries and industrial companies, are struggling and some are even closing down. The speaker questions why France cannot achieve lower electricity prices like Spain and Portugal, where prices are below two hundred euros. The speaker urges the government to take urgent measures to support French businesses.

The speaker discusses the issue of electricity prices in France, highlighting how a portion of electricity is sold to a company at 42 euros and then resold to bakers, butchers, and small businesses at much higher prices, sometimes up to 1000 euros per megawatt. The speaker mentions that the profit goes to these companies, but the government also takes a share above 180 euros. This difference in prices between France, Spain, and Portugal benefits the oligarchs and the state budget. The speaker considers this situation to be a major scandal and mentions raising the issue in the National Assembly to put pressure on the government and spread awareness through a video.

Speaker 0 and Speaker 1 discuss a pattern of market consolidation and the leverage of downturns to roll up smaller players. Speaker 0 asks, “Is this an intentional effort to dump and then roll up the little guys?” In response, Speaker 1 asserts that, “Of course. Everything has been for the last twenty years. And and COVID put that on steroids, and now they can see the light at the end of the tunnel.” The exchange frames the situation as offensive and horrifying, with Speaker 1 describing the current state as the outcome of antitrust laws not being enforced: “It's offensive. Okay? It's so horrifying to watch our antitrust laws just not be enforced.” Speaker 0 adds that those doing the consolidating “don't mind it all defaulting because that's how they just pick it all up.” Speaker 1 reframes the dynamic as an opportunity rather than a problem: “This isn't a problem. This is an opportunity, Katherine.” The dialogue ties the consolidation to pension fund money, implying a transfer of wealth from smaller actors to larger ones and suggesting a broader societal impact: “with our pension fund money.” Speaker 0 emphasizes the perception of value collapse for some individuals as a chance for others, stating, “One man's loss of his generational wealth is just another billionaire's opportunity to buy at basement bargain prices.” The conversation then shifts to a concrete anecdote from a meeting: Speaker 0 recalls sitting across from an SNL CEO who, when describing his portfolio, used a blunt expression. The CEO said, “this portfolio excuse my language. This portfolio is shit.” Speaker 0 reframes the moment as insightful, noting the CEO’s realization: “not if if you can buy it at 10¢ on the dollar. If you can buy it at 10¢ on the dollar, it's gold.” The CEO’s reaction is captured in the paraphrase: “and he looked at me and he said, oh my god. You're right. I get it.”

Speaker 0 claims that in 1996 Bill Clinton “put an act into congress” to “protect cell phone tower companies from lawsuits,” describing it as being done by “pedophiles of congress.” Speaker 0 says that at that time there were “so many cell phone tower company lawsuits happening” because people “realized that these cell phone towers were microwaves,” and that Congress then “went ahead” and created legislation that shielded the industry from legal action. Speaker 0 compares this to another event in 1986 involving “vaccine protection,” saying “Reagan did that one.” Speaker 0 states that “these people are putting things in place to protect these industries which are poisoning the American people,” and identifies “Bill Clinton” as an example in this pattern. Speaker 0 then explains the alleged effect of the 1996 act: if “they install a cell phone tower right in front of your house” and “you come down with any type of illness,” then “you can’t sue for damages.” Speaker 0 adds another example involving animals: if “the birds stop dropping,” then “you can’t sue for damages either for that too.” Speaker 0 says this is because “there are no environmental effects that are allowed to be sued for based on that 1996 act,” and that “they believe” technology “should be able to put this technology everywhere regardless of if it hurts people or animals.” Speaker 0 frames the situation as something the audience should “kind of chew on,” and then says, “But the government would never do that. Right?” Speaker 0 then includes a response attributed to “somebody” who asked, “why does the government dread hurt us?” Speaker 0 reports that this somebody said “the government is lobbied and controlled by the Federal Reserve and the Rothschilds and the Rockefellers,” and that “this is why.” Speaker 0 further states that “they don’t really work for the people anymore,” and that “you can see that on all sides.”

I will meet with Gabriel Attal this afternoon, bringing along a bottle of milk sold by Lactalis. This bottle contains milk produced by farmers, sold for 35 to 40 cents per liter. However, it is sold three and a half times more expensive in supermarkets. The CEO of Lactalis, one of the richest people in France, earns a lot of money from this. This situation symbolizes the current agricultural crisis in our country. There are those who work tirelessly to produce the milk and others who profit greatly from selling it. We need a fair distribution of wealth, margins, and minimum prices for farmers. This is what I will ask the Prime Minister for at noon.

Speaker 0 presents a call to “deflate the parasitic system,” arguing that growing, preparing, fermenting, storing, foraging, hunting one’s own food and medicine, living off grid, and swapping with local communities, alongside avoiding big government and big corporations, creates deflation. This deflation, according to the speaker, destroys inflation, corruption, and power abuse that “the rich elites” allegedly steal through money and power, and aims to deflate the parasitic big government and corporate systems more and more. The speaker asks why to deflate the parasitic system, answering that people must begin living independently locally and no longer feed or support large-scale states and companies; otherwise decay will reoccur because those states and companies will remain parasitic and destructive due to their excessive scale. A healthy parasite-host relationship would require the parasite to stay subordinate and non-destructive toward its host. Large-scale states and corporations are described as parasitic and destructive because their excessive scale allows wealth to be siphoned from grassroots to higher levels, creating an ever more extreme parasitic sociopathic elite, according to the speaker. The elites and their parasitic system are depicted as an overarching “multiple host cancer” that drains life from the common people, driven by parasitic sociopathic elites and by people enabled by large-scale systems. The speaker contrasts gradual change with collapse: the NJAM (likely a term used by the speaker) represents a more gradual return to people living independently and locally, or a collapse with significant suffering. The reasoning given is that big states and corporations can concentrate wealth at the top, removing resources from ordinary people. Regarding justice within the parasitic system, attempting to obtain justice from courts of “the parasitic monster, biggolfpluscorp” will fail because those courts are part of the parasite system; thus, the remedy is to starve the parasitic monster and instead feed oneself, one’s household, and one’s local community. The message includes a regional call to Brace yourselves in Belgium and presents data indicating the system is set to deflate by itself. It cites Belgium’s 2024 national debt figures: “Federal Janapr, plus 29.6 to 534.89, sub governments, plus 22%, 652.57, equals 113% of bbp. Extrapolation 2024, plus 108.3 to 724.79, = 125% of BBP.” The speaker concludes by urging further deflation of the parasitic system and reiterates the call to like and follow Source2mia.org.

Leaders gathered at the World Economic Forum in Davos to discuss the "great reset," a plan that threatens to deplete the middle class's resources. During COVID, lockdowns led to a massive transfer of wealth to billionaires, with a narrative promoting the idea that you will own nothing and be happy. I have spent my career fighting against these corporate interests, understanding their tactics to exploit our resources and communities. Despite their significant spending on propaganda to instill a sense of powerlessness, they have underestimated the strength of the people. By donating to my campaign, you show that we will not accept this any longer.

Howard Lutnick designs a system of tariffs to tax companies in America, an illegal tariff tax. They get taxed, pay in these millions. Trump says it's billions, but it's illegal. So the courts are gonna overturn it. So before the court Lutnick knows it's illegal, he created it. So before the courts turn it over, he has his sons run out and buy up the debts for, like, 20 to 30¢, not the debt, the claim against the government. So so let's say a company paid a million dollars to the government in tariffs. Lutnick's own sons went and said, we'll give you 200 to 300,000 of that million now. You no longer have a lien against the government in case we find out that those tariffs were illegal. Those tariffs that my dad designed were illegal. Then the supreme court says the tariffs are illegal, and Lutnick's sons now go collect the million dollars back from the government. So instead of the American corporations getting back the tariffs that were illegally taxed to them or the American people who paid the higher rates. Lutnick, who designed the illegal tariff system, is going to pocket it all with his family just like just another grift.

In this video, the speaker questions why there is little discussion about France being a country where many general practitioners have been condemned by the medical board for reporting incidents. They also mention the lack of reporting by doctors in the Outreau case, where children were hospitalized. The speaker suggests discussing the role of transnational companies, specifically mentioning Orange France Télécom, and how they organize activities for their executives in Africa. They acknowledge the seriousness of their statements and invite anyone who disagrees to take legal action. The speaker highlights that in the Orange case, the only person sanctioned was a company executive who tried to expose the wrongdoing and almost lost their life as a result. They conclude by acknowledging that all social structures seek to protect themselves and suggest fighting against this.

The speaker discusses the issue of taxes and the lack of transparency in how the government uses the money. They argue that this is a sign of the United States moving towards fascism, as private corporations are increasingly running governmental operations. The speaker also mentions that pension and retirement funds are investing in these corporations, but there is no reporting back on where the money goes. They bring up the example of S&P downgrading the US Treasury in 2011 and how the Department of Justice went after them, suggesting that rating agencies can no longer rate the US Treasury due to the potential consequences.

The speaker expresses concern about election interference and accuses Biden and his associates of running a campaign to damage him. They criticize the corruption and bias in the legal system, specifically mentioning Mark Pomerantz and Colangelo. The speaker believes that the ongoing trials are unfair and politically motivated. They mention the raid on Mar-a-Lago and claim it is illegal. The speaker also discusses their financial situation, stating they have a lot of cash and a successful company. They express frustration with the judge and attorney general in New York and suggest that businesses may leave the state. The speaker concludes by saying they would be willing to testify in the trial if it proceeds.

Speaker 0: The Parasitic System 12/13/2023, Let's Deflate the Parasitic System! A AI generated voice and subtitles. Growing, preparing, fermenting, storing, foraging, hunting your own food and medicine, living off grid, swapping with your local community, avoiding big government and big corp creates deflation. It destroys inflation, corruption and power abuse with which the rich elites steal money and power. Let's deflate the parasitic big government and corp more and more. Why deflate the parasitic system? People must start living independently locally and no longer feed and support large scale states and companies. Otherwise the decay just always starts over again. After all, those states and companies will always be parasitic destructive in nature due to their excessive scale. After all, in a surviving healthy parasite host relationship the parasite must remain subordinate and non destructive towards his host. Large scale and thus parasitic states and corporations rise above and destroy their many hosts until the entire system collapses. This characterizes the elites and their parasitic system as an overarching multiple host cancer, sucking the life out of all the common people at the same time driven by parasitic sociopathic elites and by people being enabled by large scale systems. In my view the NJAM is a more gradual return to people living independently and locally, or is a collapse with a lot of suffering. The reason why those states plus corporations are parasitic destructive, is the following: Their excessive scale offers the opportunity to suck wealth away from the grassroots and concentrate it higher up in the system. This creates an increasingly extreme parasitic sociopathic elite. Trying to get justice from the courts of the parasitic monster, biggolfpluscorp, will always fail. After all, that is like asking justice from the parasites that feed on you. Therefore starve the parasitic monster. Instead feed yourself, your household and your local community. Brace yourselves in Belgium. System is set to deflate by itself. Belgian national debt 2024 in billions of euros. Federal Janapr, plus 29.6 to 534.89, sub governments, plus 22%, 652.57, equals 113% of bbp. Extrapolation 2024, plus 108.3 to 724.79, = 125% of BBP. Therefore, let's deflate the parasitic system even more! Source2mia.org. Please like and follow.

In France, the speaker explains that the country operates under a neoliberal system rather than a liberal one. They argue that when financiers cannot win through competition, the government intervenes to manipulate the market so that the financiers always come out on top. This is what will happen with EDF, as the state has mandated that EDF must sell 25% of its production to private suppliers at a cost price of €49 per megawatt-hour. This means that EDF will lose 25% of its profits, allowing private companies to add their margins and make a profit. However, these profits will not be used to maintain the nuclear power plants. The speaker questions why EDF didn't use its existing profits to invest in renewable energy instead. They argue that most of these private suppliers rely on the cheap electricity they obtain from EDF rather than investing in renewables themselves. The speaker clarifies that it is still EDF producing the electricity, but they issue fake ownership titles to private suppliers who then sell it back to consumers at a higher price.

According to the speaker, powerful, wealthy entities influence politicians to create laws that benefit them. Robert Kennedy Junior stated these entities work in coordination to increase authoritarian control, transform people into consumers, shift wealth to the ultra-rich, and exploit the planet. They are allegedly at war with democracy and operate without checks, balances, or legal constraints. The speaker claims there is a secret government operation with more resources than the constitutional government. This operation is described as a criminal enterprise, unsanctioned by the president or Congress, that uses tax dollars to exploit the planet and impoverish populations. The speaker asserts this is the problem that needs to be addressed.