reSee.it - Related Video Feed

Nous n'avons jamais perturbé les réunions de nos adversaires, ni les violé, ni empêché leurs conférences de presse. Nous n'avons jamais manifesté contre les résultats des élections. L'extrême gauche, en revanche, manifeste, brûle, casse, et intimide ses adversaires. Cela doit cesser car cela menace la démocratie. Translation: We have never disrupted our opponents' meetings, violated them, or prevented their press conferences. We have never protested against election results. The far left, on the other hand, protests, burns, breaks, and intimidates its opponents. This must stop as it undermines democracy.

The speaker questions the legitimacy and purpose of the person they are addressing, stating they had never heard of them and that nobody in Europe had either. They ask who voted for this person and what mechanism exists for the people of Europe to remove them, implying a lack of democratic process. The speaker accuses the person of intending to be the "quiet assassin of European democracy and of the European nation states" and suggests they loathe the concept of nation states, possibly because they come from Belgium, which the speaker calls "pretty much a non country." The speaker acknowledges the person is competent, capable, and dangerous.

Gardons notre calme et attendons de voir ce qui se passe. Il est crucial d'appliquer nos lois en Europe, surtout lorsque celles-ci risquent d'être contournées. Si nous ne les faisons pas respecter, cela pourrait mener à des interférences. Nous avons déjà agi en Roumanie, et il sera nécessaire de le faire en Allemagne si la situation l'exige. --- Let’s stay calm and wait to see what happens. It is crucial to enforce our laws in Europe, especially when they are at risk of being circumvented. If we do not uphold them, it could lead to interference. We have already acted in Romania, and it will be necessary to do so in Germany if the situation requires it.

Emmanuel Macron's proposal to expand the referendum on popular initiatives is seen as a potential threat to democracy. While more referendums may seem beneficial, historically, they have been used to bypass the rule of law and establish authoritarian regimes. The National Assembly is now championing the use of referendums to push for measures that are currently prohibited by the constitution and fundamental rights. For instance, a referendum could be used to address immigration or public liberties, and there is a concern that it could even lead to the reintroduction of the death penalty. Overall, Macron's proposal raises concerns about the potential dangers and erosion of democracy that could arise from an expanded use of referendums.

I and my family have been checked multiple times, but nothing was found. I will continue to fight and stand tall for what I haven't done. I have always had the trust of the French people. My fellow citizens, the parliament has just passed the law allowing the ratification of the Lisbon Treaty. I have never taken advantage of the French trade.

Marine Le Pen's embezzlement conviction has made her ineligible to run for president, a catastrophic end to her political career. The charges stem from allegedly taking money from the European Parliament, meant for MEPs, and funneling it to her party in France. The speaker questions whether the charges are legitimate or a politically motivated attempt to control a popular right-wing leader amid rising frustration with mass migration and national breakdown. They ask if Europe is in a democracy crisis, pointing to Trump's legal battles and the potential "lawfare" against Conor McGregor. The speaker questions whether protecting borders is racist, particularly for melting pot nations. They also question the role of global bureaucracies like the EU and UN, suggesting they facilitate institutional power rather than individual freedom. They ask if repurposing European Parliament funds for national endeavors is truly a terrible crime, or a pretext to stop Le Pen from running. They highlight the rise of populist movements in Europe, like the gilets jaunes, protesting corporate financial power. They argue that people should be able to choose their leader, regardless of whether others agree with their rhetoric.

Sortons de l'Union européenne, c'est la seule solution. Nous sommes à saturation. Les vrais drapeaux sont là. --- Let's leave the European Union; it's the only solution. We are at capacity. The real flags are here.

We do not trust the polls. Mr. Mélenchon claims victory, but we fought against lies. We respect the French people's decision. The country is paralyzed, and the dominant force in parliament will have a devastating program. We regret the loss of precious time for urgent solutions.

We are here to tell you that you picked this fight and now you've got it. We, along with millions of brave citizens, will fight you every step of the way. You, the small French minority, do not have the right to dictate what people want. Take it from us, the seven citizens gathered here today, and the millions around the world. We will bring you down and won't stop until we succeed.

The speaker discusses the absence of the parliament and the use of Article 49-3. They criticize the government for not respecting the parliament's vote and for triggering Article 49-3 before the general discussion even began. The speaker questions the purpose of the laws and the government's assumptions about economic growth and inflation. They also mention the government's lack of explanation regarding the twelve billion euros in savings. The opposition groups unanimously voted against these actions, leading to the use of Article 49-3. The speaker emphasizes the importance of respecting parliamentary democracy.

The speaker questions Monsieur Darmanin about the removal of citizen control over elections. They mention that the annexation of proxy lists to the voting records has been eliminated, making it technically impossible to verify a vote. They express the difficulty in making a recourse within the given ten-day timeframe due to the decentralization of the process. The speaker shares their personal experience of finding 64 non-existent proxy votes out of 134 in their constituency, which raises concerns about dishonest practices. They ask Monsieur Darmanin how he plans to address these issues in the upcoming European elections to protect democracy.

Macron, tu nous appauvris, tu nous abandonnes pour les migrants. Tu ne te soucies pas de nous, tu nous envoies mourir en Ukraine. Ta place n'est pas à l'Élysée, mais ici. Translation: Macron, you impoverish us, you abandon us for migrants. You don't care about us, you send us to die in Ukraine. Your place is not at the Élysée, but here.

We don't want to be like the European Union, we don't care about them. We are French and we stick to French laws.

The speaker questions Monsieur Darmanin about the removal of citizen control over elections and the difficulties in verifying the results. They mention that the annexation of proxy lists to the voting records has been eliminated, making it technically impossible to verify the elections. They highlight instances of dishonesty and errors in previous elections and ask how the government plans to address these issues in the upcoming European elections.

It's quite funny because you don't have the majority to pass a text, so you have to use Article 49.3. Normally, this means that the parliament is not in favor of you, but we also can't get a majority on a vote of no confidence. So no one can get a majority. The reason is simple: maybe those who can swing the vote don't want to go back to the polls because they're afraid they won't be able to win again. The real question is that those who can swing the vote in this chamber are afraid to face it. The GDR group will go all the way and vote for the motion of no confidence. We hope to be able to debate and vote on a finance law in this parliament someday. That's all I wanted to say. Thank you, my dear colleague.

Mélenchon est conscient du tour de passe-passe qu'il essaie de faire. L'opposition à un gouvernement autour de LFI n'est pas seulement une question d'étiquette, de personnalité ou de style, mais principalement à cause du programme annoncé. Ce programme est dangereux pour le pays et dangereux immédiatement. Le NFP dit « notre programme, tout notre programme et rien que notre programme ». Et dans ce programme, il y a des choses extrêmement lourdes. Translation: Mélenchon is aware of the sleight of hand he is trying to pull. The opposition to a government formed around LFI is not just a matter of labels, personality, or style, but mainly because of the announced program. This program is dangerous for the country and dangerous immediately. The NFP says "our program, all of our program and nothing but our program." And in this program, there are extremely serious things.

La loi permet d'interdire certains réseaux pour protéger nos démocraties en Europe. Quand on parle d'interdiction, cela peut inclure des plateformes comme Twitter. Il est important de comprendre que cette loi n'est pas personnelle, mais résulte d'un processus démocratique. Bien qu'elle ait été élaborée avec mon équipe, elle a été amendée et votée par le Parlement européen. C'est une loi qui représente les parlementaires et non un individu. --- The law allows for the prohibition of certain networks to protect our democracies in Europe. When discussing prohibition, this could include platforms like Twitter. It's important to understand that this law is not personal but results from a democratic process. Although it was developed with my team, it was amended and voted on by the European Parliament. This is a law that represents the parliamentarians, not an individual.

I came to meet Emmanuel Macron and talk about his lies. He lied about Covid, the war, and retirement. He has put the country in chaos. I got vaccinated because he said he was vaccinated, but now people, including lawmakers, are saying he isn't. I want to ask him if it's true. Mr. Macron, can you answer? He will probably say he will go through the process without empathy. I don't think he cares about the French people. There is a deputy in the National Assembly who says he isn't vaccinated, so we want to know the truth. Are you vaccinated or not? If you don't want to answer, the French people will judge.

Once there was a law proposed by Darmanin, I'm not sure where it stands now, that would punish scientifically or medically stating something contrary to the government with a fine of 15,000 euros or imprisonment. It's quite something. It's as if they were considering silencing those who disagreed with the government at any given moment. I don't think we've ever had constraints or obligations to only communicate the official version of science in our country's history. It's reached an unimaginable level of dictatorship. This existed in Gaullist countries under Stalin. Translation: Once there was a law proposed by Darmanin, I'm not sure where it stands now, that would punish scientifically or medically stating something contrary to the government with a fine of 15,000 euros or imprisonment. It's quite something. It's as if they were considering silencing those who disagreed with the government at any given moment. I don't think we've ever had constraints or obligations to only communicate the official version of science in our country's history. It's reached an unimaginable level of dictatorship. This existed in Gaullist countries under Stalin.

The speaker discusses the controversy surrounding President Macron's vaccination status. They mention that the speaker, Jean Lassalle, a former deputy, made a statement claiming that Macron was not vaccinated. The interviewer asks why Lassalle made this claim, highlighting his history of political activism, including a hunger strike. Lassalle asserts that he spoke the truth and had confirmation of his claim. He also mentions the importance of protecting sources and adhering to journalistic and parliamentary ethics. Lassalle believes that Macron was not vaccinated and suggests that there may be evidence to support this claim.

Speaker 0 accuses Jean-Luc Mélenchon of compromising with totalitarianism, embracing anti-Semitism, and adopting a form of Trumpism. Speaker 1 agrees, calling it a form of denial and alternative truth. Speaker 0 emphasizes that this trend will continue and announces that their political party, Generation Ecology, has severed ties with Mélenchon's group. They urge other political parties, especially Europe Ecology-The Greens, to definitively break away from Mélenchon. Speaker 1 questions why others are hesitant to do so. Speaker 0 suggests that they may not fully grasp the seriousness of the situation and the significance of Mélenchon's refusal to label Hamas as a terrorist organization. They argue that as defenders of the republic and ecological values, there can be no political or electoral alliance with someone who has abandoned democracy, the republic, and humanism.

I am being pursued for posting images of Daesh in response to a journalist's comparison between Daesh and the National Rally. I found it disgraceful, so I said Daesh is this, and now I am being pursued. They also want to subject me to a psychiatric evaluation. I published the psychiatric evaluation to inform the French people because I think it's not insignificant that the leader of the main opposition party in France is being subjected to a psychiatric evaluation. I am being pursued for publishing a psychiatric evaluation. Do you not feel there is a persecution? If it means pushing our compatriots to hate this barbaric organization, I fully accept it. We need to know where good and evil lie and if we don't dare to say what evil is, then we cannot effectively fight it. The media in Germany, the UK, and the US were scandalized by this, saying how can they pursue a politician for denouncing Daesh. No one understands this.

Madam van der Leyen, the European people are not interested in this election of commissioners, and this is your fault. Through backroom deals and technocratic hypocrisy, you have disgusted citizens with European institutions. They know these commissioners will reflect the stifling, dangerous, and stagnant Europe you have created. To millions of voters, I pledge that for the next five years, I will not let you turn our continent into a soulless space ruled by technocratic whims. With those committed to truth and freedom, we will break the silence in your institution. You may win this election, but we will make you lose everything else. In the next five years, we will grant you no respite. We will no longer allow you to operate in the shadows. We will be the spotlight focused on your actions. Europeans must know the truth. They want it, need it, and have the right to it.

Le président de la République tente de recentrer les débats sur la guerre en Europe pour les élections, ce qui divise et semble irresponsable. Les accords avec l'Ukraine pour l'OTAN sont critiqués comme une diversion des problèmes nationaux. Macron est accusé d'immaturité, narcissisme et cynisme. Son attitude est jugée dangereuse pour des vies humaines. Son armée est remise en question quant à sa capacité de tenir une semaine en guerre. Translation: The President is criticized for trying to shift focus to war in Europe before elections, which is seen as divisive and irresponsible. Agreements with Ukraine for NATO are viewed as a distraction from national issues. Macron is accused of immaturity, narcissism, and cynicism. His behavior is deemed dangerous for human lives. His army's ability to withstand a week of war is questioned.

The speaker criticizes the European Commission, calling them "Talibans of the law" and "dogmatic extremists" on competition policy. They argue that France should prioritize its national interest and keep its dams, dismissing any interference from the Commission. When asked about the queen, the speaker suggests removing her, questioning the Commission's authority and dismissing any potential consequences. They emphasize the need to protect France's national interest and oppose any infringements. The speaker concludes by urging moderation and calm in the face of excesses.