reSee.it - Related Video Feed

The speaker discusses declassified documents from the Biden administration designating potential violent domestic extremists. These documents allegedly identify individuals as likely to turn to violence based on ideologies connected to opposing Biden administration policies. Examples include opposition to COVID vaccine and mask mandates, concerns about forced vaccination of children in schools, and disagreement with Biden's border policy. The speaker connects these documents, issued in December 2021, to President Biden's 2022 speech warning that Donald Trump and MAGA Republicans pose a threat to the republic. They also link it to alleged FBI directives to social media companies to censor Americans to prevent the spread of domestic violent extremism. The speaker concludes that this represents the weaponization and politicization of the intelligence community against the American people.

The discussion centers on whether a deep state or nefarious forces are maneuvering against President Trump, and whether Trump is being restricted by a gatekeeping inner circle that blocks information. Laura Logan is cited as saying, based on her sources in the intel community, that Trump is being set up to fail and there will be no coming back if he doesn’t act, a claim they discuss with urgency and detail. Key points raised: - There is a concern about how information reaches Trump, with examples cited such as the New York Times reporting on a person removing briefing papers from the president’s desk, described as an act of treason and sedition, and discussions of withholding information from him by intelligence agencies. - An “asteroid belt” around Trump’s inner circle is described as blocking entry for others who might report to him, with gatekeepers preventing action and limiting accountability. - The lack of action within the administration is presented as a major concern, with questions about personnel in critical departments. Specific issues include unfilled ambassadorial and deputy positions across the State, Defense, and other departments, and the presence of loyalists to the prior administration. - Names and potential targets of concern are discussed, though the speaker emphasizes not knowing all the names or proving definitively. Todd Blanche is repeatedly mentioned as a name that comes up in intel tracking, and there are claims about Maria? (likely Susie Wiles) and Susie Wiles as gatekeepers; Noel Frisch’s reporting on Susie Wiles is referenced; Sergio Gore is noted as removed from White House personnel and now ambassador to India; Scavino is mentioned as involved in personnel matters. - The conversation highlights the roles of various actors: Rubio’s connections to Cuba are discussed in the context of broader foreign influence; comparisons are drawn between actors connected to Cuba, the CCP, and Chevron, suggesting influence operations. - The Trump administration is accused of having eight deputy positions in intelligence and defense occupied by people not loyal to Trump, with similar loyalties issues in the DOJ and other departments; cited examples include the delay in implementing executive orders and foreign policy reforms, such as rewriting the foreign service manual and a supposed ninety-day review of foreign assistance. - There is skepticism about the ability to replace or reform agencies like TSA and FEMA while personnel are acting or non-loyal; concerns about ambassadors who resigned on day one still remaining in place are voiced. - The impeachment discussion centers on the belief that Trump will be impeached if Republicans lose the House or Senate, with claims that impeachment would hinge on charges like failure to hold people accountable; the claim is made that there has been extensive investigation into Russia collusion and January 6, and that treason and sedition have been carried out by others, which should prompt accountability but currently do not. - The broader political strategy is described as ongoing information warfare, with allegations that those in power would use impeachment or punitive measures against Trump supporters, while those currently in power have allegedly violated constitutional duties, including border policy and redress of grievances. - They reference the Seditious Six and assert that those individuals are encouraging military disobedience; the argument is that accountability is needed, and if not, those who supported Trump may feel betrayed. - Laura Logan promotes her forthcoming episode of Going Rogue, inviting viewers to see receipts and evidence, and thanks the host,予 noting Christmas wishes and closing remarks.

Donald Trump could weaponize the Department of Justice against political opponents and turn the FBI into his personal police force. This is characterized as how dictatorships, not America, operate.

Congress has little power and is offended that the speaker won't appear before a partisan committee. The speaker believes the real story goes back to 2016, with attempts to interfere with the election and overthrow the Trump administration. The speaker stands for fair trade, securing borders, and ending endless wars. Special interests in Washington can't make money under Trump, so they weaponize the justice system to prevent his return to the White House.

The speaker discusses the concerns raised by Trump's critics, comparing them to the actions of the Biden Harris administration. They highlight the danger of labeling Trump as a modern-day Hitler and the implicit call for violence against him. The speaker argues that this message is alarming and goes against the principles of the United States. They criticize those in positions of power for abusing their authority and undermining democracy in their pursuit of their desired outcome.

President Trump is facing multiple criminal trials, with allegations of interference in elections. Various officials are accused of targeting him politically, including mishandling classified information. The speaker raises concerns about government weaponization and double standards, warning of the potential implications for all Americans. The focus is on the misuse of law to target political opponents. The witnesses discuss the dangerous precedent set by these actions.

The speaker warns that Trump is focused on revenge, which could harm the Department of Justice and FBI. People in law enforcement fear being targeted if Trump wins a second term. There are concerns about being unlawfully detained or jailed. The speaker urges Americans to take Trump's threats seriously, as he often follows through on his promises.

The speaker believes it should be terrifying to all Americans that Trump had classified information for Americans and the codes, and was able to share it in his resort with anyone. The speaker states Trump needs to be stopped.

A second term for Donald Trump is portrayed as a dangerous scenario where he may become a dictator, suppress rights, and dismantle democracy. There are concerns about violence, censorship, and the abuse of power. The speakers warn of potential attacks on American citizens, the justice system, and democratic institutions. They emphasize the urgency of preventing Trump from staying in office beyond a second term to protect the republic.

In a potential second Trump presidency, there are concerns about the misuse of power within the Justice Department. The speaker believes Trump could target his enemies, such as Andrew McCabe, by ordering criminal investigations. This could lead to a significant threat to the rule of law in America.

The speaker asserts that a second Trump term would be a huge risk for America and dangerous. They claim Trump would use the military against those he perceives as enemies. These targets would include journalists whose stories he dislikes, election officials who refuse to manipulate votes for him, and judges who adhere to the law instead of bending to his will. The speaker believes Trump has attacked these groups before.

He plans to use the Department of Justice against his opponents, remove peaceful protesters, and possibly end the Constitution.

Speaker 0 asserts that a clip shown does not accurately represent what "he" has been saying about the American people, claiming "he" has repeatedly spoken about turning Americans against each other and targeting peaceful protesters. Speaker 0 states "he" has talked about imprisoning those who disagree with him, which is unacceptable in a democracy where the president should handle criticism. Speaker 0 references Mark Milley's assessment of Donald Trump as a threat to the United States. Speaker 1 references Bob Woodward's book. Speaker 1 asks about calling Donald Trump misguided. Speaker 0 clarifies that she calls him unstable and mentally not stable.

In a second term, Donald Trump is predicted to take extreme actions, including violence, suppressing opposition, shutting down the media, and using martial law against the American people. He may terminate and rewrite the constitution, establish internment camps, and target minority groups. Trump's armed extremist base could pose a threat, and he may unravel democratic institutions, cozy up to Putin, and destroy the justice department. Transgender rights, the rule of law, and political opponents could be targeted. Trump's reelection could lead to the end of democracy as we know it, with the potential for him to stay in office indefinitely. Urgent action is needed to prevent this outcome.

There are concerns that Donald Trump could misuse the doomsday book, a document meant to protect the country during foreign invasion or rebellion, for his own political gain. He could potentially use extraordinary powers to shut down companies, control the Internet, or deploy the military within the US. The American people are not widely aware of these emergency powers, which is worrisome. Trump could also weaponize government agencies like the Department of Education and the Department of Veterans Affairs to benefit his allies and harm his enemies, including people in blue states. The speaker recalls Trump's reluctance to provide emergency aid to blue states because he disliked them. In summary, the doomsday book poses a threat if Trump were to exploit its powers for personal or political reasons.

The speaker asserts that financial systems face unprecedented risks due to economic chaos from President Trump and Elon Musk. Another speaker states that Trump ran on curbing wasteful spending, citing the $36 trillion national debt as fiscally and morally irresponsible. They claim Trump is the final decision-maker, contrasting this with the previous administration where key decisions were allegedly made by others, possibly during the president's "afternoon nap time." The speaker suggests labeling figures like Jake Sullivan, Ron Klain, and Jill Biden as "co-presidents" during that time and calls for honesty regarding past and present events.

Trump is not loyal to the United States and does not like the country, its laws, constitution, or people, calling them names. He has affection for dictators and authoritarianism. According to the speaker, the U.S. is in the midst of a collapse, politically and in the markets. The speaker believes Trump sees himself going down and will try to take the whole country with him. The speaker believes Trump wants to hurt the country and will try anything he can to help himself.

Trump seems to believe that attacking Teslas or dealerships is domestic terrorism, while attempting to kill cops to overthrow the government and change an election is not. According to Speaker 1, Trump thinks freedom and liberties belong only to people who agree with him. Speaker 1 states that this view of America is not shared by people who believe in the Constitution.

Trump having had the codes and now possessing classified information for Americans, potentially sharing it at his resort with anyone, should be terrifying to all Americans. He needs to be stopped.

Speaker 0 claims that Pelosi is trying to remove the chairman of the joint chiefs of staff through the 25th Amendment or impeachment. The reason for this is because Pelosi's laptop was allegedly taken by a group of special forces mixed with Antifa during the recent events. Speaker 0 believes that this group has sensitive data and there is someone who will expose it, leading to a major change. They mention an executive order from 2018 that allows the President to declare an emergency if foreigners are involved in US elections, suggesting that COVID-19 was a deliberate biological attack.

Some Democrats in Congress are pushing legislation called the "Disgrace Act," sponsored by Representative Benny Thompson, that would strip President Trump of his Secret Service protection. The claim is that Democrats argue a "disgraced convicted felon" who may be imprisoned shouldn't have the same protections as other former presidents. This is allegedly a calculated plan to dehumanize Trump after branding him a felon. The speaker asserts that Democrats are willing to jeopardize Trump's life to remove the possibility of him being re-elected. They believe Democrats are terrified of losing power and will do anything to stop people from voting for Trump.

The discussion centers on how politicization of intelligence has manifested in different eras, comparing past and present administrations. Speaker 0 asks whether the politicized weapons claims about Iraq and the CIA’s statements in the 1990s can be compared to today’s politicization of intelligence under John Ratcliffe and Tulsi Gabbard as head of DNI, arguing it is much worse now because of the mediocrity of those in control of key agencies. Speaker 1 counters by recalling the 1980s, noting that there was significant politicization of the Soviet threat to justify Reagan’s defense buildup, and adds that this is why he testified against Robert Gates in 1991. He asserts that politicization is bad, and insists that the current situation is worse than in the past. Speaker 1 explains: “It’s Because I look at the people who are ahead of these groups. Come on. Let’s be serious.” He targets the leadership of the director of national intelligence, the FBI, the Department of Homeland Security, and the CIA, saying, “Have you ever seen a cabinet in The United States of such mediocrity, of such venality?” He emphasizes his background, stating, “I haven’t,” and that nothing compares to what is going on now, warning that “a lot of damage is being done to The United States and to the constitution of The United States and to the importance of separation of powers and the importance of rule of law and the importance of checks and balances. This is very serious stuff.” Speaker 0 attempts to steer toward historical figures like Robert Maxwell, but Speaker 1 dismisses that concern as off point, insisting he is making a point about Israel. The exchange then shifts to U.S. support for Israel, with Speaker 1 asserting that “Israel gets what it wants from The United States. It gets it from democratic presidents and from republican presidents.” He also criticizes Barack Obama for signing what he calls “that ten year $40,000,000,000 arms aid agreement,” arguing that Obama “never should have signed” it “because they treated Obama so shabbily in the first place.”

Speaker 0: Question about the danger of a Trump presidency if reelected. Speaker 1: I think he poses a a near existential threat to the rule of law. He will do everything he can in a new term to try to tear down the institutions that he sees as threats and dismantle them and the people who occupy them, the apolitical people who occupy them. So there is a lot on the ballot in 2024 if he's a candidate, but the rule of law, in my view, is at the very top of the list. I'm gonna pull the whole thing down. I'm gonna bring the whole fucking diseased, corrupt temple down on your head. It's gonna be biblical.

Donald Trump has presented himself as someone who can finish the job outside of the norms of legislating. Democrats need to focus on the potential consequences of a second Trump term, with loyal advisers and no guardrails. Trump's team is prepared and he knows how to drive the bus. It will be even more chaotic than before. We must make it clear that Trump is not fit for office. He only cares about his power and success. He poses a threat to American democracy and could potentially overthrow the government. His actions could lead to imprisonment and execution for those who oppose him.

The speaker discusses how President Trump's actions towards the intelligence community could have consequences. They mention that the intelligence community has ways of retaliating and that they are upset with how Trump has treated and talked about them. The speaker also highlights a statement from Chuck Schumer, the leader of the Democratic Party in the Senate, who suggests that the president should be afraid of the CIA. The speaker criticizes Schumer and Mitch McConnell, claiming they are influenced by money from Wall Street, the military-industrial complex, and health insurance companies. They argue that corruption is the reason for the current state of the country.