reSee.it - Related Video Feed

The discussion centers on gain-of-function (GoF) research, its regulation, and the motivations behind it. The first speaker notes the administration’s goal to end GoF research and asks where that stands. The second speaker says progress has been made, and the White House is working on a formal policy. He then defines the issue in stages: what GoF research is, why someone would do it, and how to regulate it to prevent dangerous projects that could catastrophically harm human populations. He clarifies that GoF research is not inherently bad, but dangerous GoF research is. He gives an insulin example: creating bacteria to produce insulin is a legitimate GoF that benefits diabetics. In contrast, taking a virus from bat caves, bringing it to a lab in a densely populated city with weak biosafety, and manipulating it to be more transmissible among humans is a dangerous GoF that should not be supported. The administration’s policy aims to prevent such dangerous work entirely, and the President signed an executive order in April or May endorsing this policy. Next, he discusses implementation: how to create incentives to ensure this research does not recur. He explains that the utopian idea behind such research was to prevent all pandemics by collecting viruses from wild places, testing their potential to infect humans by increasing their pathogenicity, and then preparing countermeasures in advance (vaccines, antivirals) and stockpiling them, even though those countermeasures would not have been tested against humans yet. If a virus did leap to humans, the foreseen countermeasures might prove ineffective because evolution is unpredictable. This “triage” approach—identifying pathogens most likely to leap and preemptively preparing against them—was the rationale for dangerous GoF work, a rationale he characterizes as flawed. He notes that many scientists considered this an effort to do bioweapons research under the guise of safety and defense. The work is dual-use. The U.S. is a signatory to the Biological Weapons Convention and does not conduct offensive bio-weapons research, but other countries might. The discussion highlights that the GoF research discussed during the pandemic can backfire and may not align with true biodefense, since countermeasures might not match whatever pathogen actually emerges. The speaker concludes that this agenda—pursuing GoF to prevent pandemics—has drawn substantial support from parts of the Western world and other countries for about two and a half decades, but he implies it is not deserving of continuation.

There is evidence suggesting that the Chinese Communist Party leaked the virus from a laboratory in Wuhan. They hid the truth about person-to-person transmission, which hindered our response. The Chinese Communist Party continues to conduct risky research, even using American funds. We recently discovered they are working on a COVID virus that affects the brain. We need a moratorium on this type of research. Witnesses who could provide information have mysteriously died, and the Chinese Communist Party has removed DNA sequences that could prove our theory. We must prevent future situations by stopping gain of function research and not aiding our enemies. The scientific community in China collaborates with the military and the CCP, posing a serious threat to us.

The speaker is working with Jay Bhattacharya and Secretary Kennedy to investigate US-funded gain of function research, including at the Wuhan lab, which they believe may have led to the COVID-19 pandemic. They aim to provide evidence linking this research to the pandemic. The speaker claims Anthony Fauci denied this research under oath and may have sought a preemptive pardon. They argue that gain of function research continues in biolabs worldwide, posing a risk of future pandemics. The speaker faced criticism for warning about US-funded biolabs in Ukraine. The speaker questions why the intelligence community was reluctant to conclude that COVID-19 originated in a lab, contrasting this with instances where they quickly make assumptions without conclusive evidence. They attribute this to the politicization of intelligence, citing the Iraq War as an example of intelligence being used to influence policy.

The speaker reflects on their previous warnings about the weaponization of nature and the dire consequences it has had. They express gratitude for the opportunity to have a public conversation about this issue. The speaker then delves into the history of coronavirus, highlighting its isolation in 1965 and subsequent modifications and experiments. They discuss the patenting of infectious replication-defective clones of coronavirus and the violation of biological and chemical weapons treaties. The speaker also mentions the financial aspects and lack of moral oversight in the development of vaccines. They conclude by calling for an end to gain of function research and corporate patronage of science without assuming product liability. (150 words)

The speakers discuss whether the NIH funded gain of function research and its potential role in the pandemic. There is a heated exchange between a senator and a speaker who denies responsibility for any deaths. The possibility of Dr. Fauci lying under oath is raised, and it is suggested that American tax dollars funded the research. The Luban Institute is mentioned as conducting gain of function research. Dr. Redfield expresses concern that the virus may have been engineered. Gain of function research is defined as increasing a pathogen's transmissibility or pathogenicity. It is concluded that gain of function research did not stop the pandemic, but rather caused it.

The speaker reflects on their past warnings about the weaponization of nature and the dire consequences it has had on humanity. They express gratitude for the opportunity to have a public conversation about this issue. They discuss the history of coronavirus, including its isolation in 1965 and subsequent modifications and experiments. They highlight the unethical actions of organizations like the CDC and the University of North Carolina Chapel Hill, who patented and manipulated the virus. They emphasize the need to end gain of function research and corporate influence in science. The speaker concludes by calling for accountability and a halt to the weaponization of nature.

The speaker discusses the development of vaccines and raises concerns about a specific type of research called gain-of-function. They suggest that this research involves making viruses more dangerous and could potentially be used to create bio weapons. They mention that Anthony Fauci, a prominent figure in the field, received a raise for his involvement in this research. In 2014, three dangerous viruses escaped from labs in the US, leading 300 scientists to urge President Obama to shut down Fauci's gain-of-function research. Although a moratorium was issued, the research was moved offshore, including to a Chinese lab in Wuhan.

The speaker suggests that American tax dollars funded gain-of-function research that created the virus. They claim that Dr. Fauci and various government agencies, including the NIH, State Department, USAID, and DOD, were involved. They argue that Fauci funded a study that taught Chinese military scientists how to build weapons of mass destruction and hide human tampering on the virus. They question why the U.S. government would fund such research and why they were teaching Chinese scientists. They also mention the CIA's involvement and their role in the cover-up. The speaker raises concerns about the lack of medical benefit and the potential bioweapons implications.

In 2014, a gain of function moratorium was implemented in the US due to lab accidents. Despite this, gain of function research continued in China with funding from Dr. Fauci. The NIH lifted the moratorium in 2017 without proper consultation. There are concerns that US-funded research at the Wuhan Institute of Virology may have led to the COVID-19 pandemic. Dr. Ebright believes that lapses in oversight of this research could have caused the pandemic and may lead to future ones.

The speaker discusses the alleged cover-up surrounding the origins of COVID-19. They claim that the US government, led by Anthony Fauci, funded dangerous gain-of-function research in China, which involved combining viruses to create a new super virus. They highlight the lack of transparency and exemptions given to this research, as well as the reopening of the door for it to continue. The speaker emphasizes the need for access to the deliberations and funding decisions. They also criticize the actions of Peter Daszak, who allegedly funneled money to Wuhan and continues to receive grants. The speaker believes there has been a significant cover-up and calls for a ban on further funding.

The speaker discusses gain-of-function research, claiming that the purpose of taking a wild virus and making it more pathogenic is to develop a vaccine for those enhanced viruses, and that the real rationale is to develop bioweapons and then a defense to those bioweapons. They assert that Anthony Fauci received a 68% raise by the military because of these new military responsibilities and continued the work through 2014. The speaker states that in 2014 three of the bugs escaped in high-profile incidents from three different U.S. labs, describing these as really deadly bugs that escaped or were found in unsafe circumstances. They claim that 300 scientists sent a letter to President Obama asking him to shut down Fauci’s gain-of-function research, arguing that it was highly likely to start a global pandemic with this dangerous research. According to the speaker, Obama issued a moratorium and shut down 18 of Fauci’s worst projects, but ultimately did not fully shut them down. Instead, the research was moved offshore to avoid White House scrutiny and the Cambridge Working Group, a group of scientists, as well as other officials. The speaker alleges that the major offshore location for this research included a Chinese lab run by the Chinese military, specifically naming the Wuhan Institute of Virology in Wuhan, China, as part of the moved research, with other work relocated to Ukraine and the former Soviet state of Georgia.

Over a decade ago, the speaker warned about the weaponization of nature and the dire consequences it would have. They believe that the current situation presents an opportunity for a public conversation on who we want to be as humanity. The speaker acknowledges their involvement in sharing information about the pandemic, thanks the members of parliament, and apologizes for any difficult terminology. They discuss the history of coronavirus research, including its isolation in 1965 and the development of vaccines in 1990. They highlight the violation of biological and chemical weapons treaties and laws, as well as the manipulation and patenting of the virus. The speaker concludes by calling for an end to gain of function research and corporate patronage of science without assuming product liability.

Gain of function research involves modifying a pathogen to increase its transmissibility or pathogenicity. This definition includes making a nonpathogen pathogenic. Regarding the Wuhan Institute, there are questions about whether they conducted gain of function research on coronaviruses. Proponents argue it could lead to vaccines or prevent pandemics, but there is skepticism. To date, gain of function research has not produced any life-saving vaccines or therapeutics, nor has it stopped a pandemic. In fact, it may have contributed to the current pandemic. While supporters of this research are well-intentioned, I personally see no tangible benefits from it.

I believe that it is possible that scientific research sponsored in part by the NIH but also lots of other entities including the Chinese government may have been the cause of the pandemic. There's a lot of people who just have fights over this. But I will say is that the kinds of biological exercises people did in order to try to prevent a pandemic, go find viruses in weird bat caves, bring them into city centers, and then augment their capacity to infect humans, The reason why they did that was I think they were arguing that we needed to do that in order to prepare just in case a pandemic happens. But think no matter what you believe about whether the cause of the pandemic was this kind of research, I think everyone can agree that that kind of research is potentially very dangerous.

The executive order addresses gain of function research, a type of biomedical research where pathogens are altered to enhance their potency or change their function. Many believe gain of function research was a key cause of the COVID pandemic. The order provides new tools to enforce federal funding regulations for gain of function research abroad, strengthens oversight mechanisms, and creates a broad strategy to ensure biomedical research is conducted safely to protect human health. It is suggested that implementing these measures earlier could have prevented the problems associated with the pandemic.

Speaker 0 advocates ending all gain-of-function research and aims to sign a treaty to cease such work globally. The goal is to gather nations to agree to end gain-of-function research, asserting it is a disaster and has yielded no benefits. The speaker claims gain-of-function research has produced a range of diseases, listing Lyme disease, COVID, and many others, with RSV cited as now one of the biggest killers of children and described as having originated from a vaccine lab. The speaker asserts a broad list of diseases can be traced back to vaccine research, and suggests there is strong evidence that even the Spanish flu came from facts related to vaccines and vaccine research. They claim medical research and vaccine research have, in their view, created some of the worst plagues in history. The speaker contends that most readers of the River (implied reference) would be convinced that HIV also came from a vaccine program, noting there is plenty of evidence suggesting that, though they stop short of asserting certainty. They state there is very little evidence that gain-of-function has provided any marginal benefits and claim it has caused horrible outcomes—“Gittahashbees” (a mispronunciation or distorted term) is used to describe the risks as simply not worth it. Additionally, the speaker says they will end gain-of-function globally, attempting to sign a treaty to reinstate the Geneva Convention and the biological weapons charter signed in 1973, and to make it verifiable with other nations agreeing to it. The overall message is a call to terminate gain-of-function research, establish an enforceable international treaty, and curb or eliminate the associated risks by aligning with historic international biological norms.

"So I believe that it is possible that scientific research sponsored in part by the NIH but also lots of other entities including the Chinese government may have been the cause of the pandemic." "the kinds of biological exercises people did in order to try to prevent a pandemic, go find viruses in weird bat caves, bring them into city centers, and then augment their capacity to infect humans," "The reason why they did that was I think they were arguing that we needed to do that in order to prepare just in case a pandemic happens." "But think no matter what you believe about whether the cause of the pandemic was this kind of research, I think everyone can agree that that kind of research is potentially very dangerous."

The executive order provides tools to enforce the ban on federal funding for gain of function research abroad. Gain of function research is a type of biomedical research where pathogens are adulterated to make them more potent or to change the way that they function. Many people believe gain of function research was one of the key causes of the COVID pandemic. The order also strengthens oversight mechanisms and creates a strategy to ensure biomedical research is conducted safely to protect human health. Some people believe that if this had been done earlier, the COVID-19 pandemic may have been avoided.

The speaker discusses the unethical actions of the CDC in patenting the SARS coronavirus, the bioterrorism threat of the RT PCR test, and the gain of function research on coronaviruses. They highlight the financial motives behind the push for a universal vaccine template and call for an end to gain of function research and corporate influence in science. The speaker emphasizes the need for moral oversight and independent review boards in scientific research.

The speaker is working with Jay Bhattacharya and Secretary Kennedy to investigate US-funded gain of function research, including at the Wuhan lab, and its potential link to the COVID-19 pandemic. They aim to provide evidence showing why ending this research is in the American people's best interest. The speaker claims that Anthony Fauci funded the pandemic and then denied it under oath to Senator Rand Paul. They also suggest Fauci sought a preemptive pardon from President Biden. The speaker was attacked for warning against US-funded biolabs in Ukraine, fearing potential pathogen releases. The speaker questions why the intelligence community was reluctant to conclude that COVID-19 originated in a lab, suggesting politicization of intelligence to meet objectives or influence policy. They draw a parallel to the intelligence used to justify the Iraq regime change war and its consequences. The speaker emphasizes the need to address these issues within the intelligence community and highlights the importance of leadership.

The speakers claim gain of function research creates dangerous viruses to develop protections against them. They allege that in 2015, a London meeting identified the Wuhan lab as likely to have problems with this research, and that Anthony Fauci was a major supporter of gain of function research for 30 years. One speaker claims gain of function research takes a wild virus and makes it more pathogenic, virulent, and deadly to develop a vaccine, suggesting the rationale is to develop bioweapons and defenses. They allege Fauci received a 68% raise from the military for these responsibilities. They claim that after three lab escapes in 2014, 300 scientists asked President Obama to shut down Fauci's gain of function research, warning it could start a global pandemic. Obama issued a moratorium, but instead of shutting down the research, it was allegedly moved offshore to places like Ukraine, Georgia, and the Wuhan Institute of Virology, which is run by the Chinese military.

There are leaks almost every week in BSL 3 and BSL 4 labs, and no lab is immune. The executive order aims to prevent inadvertent leaks and protect humanity. The COVID outbreak cost twenty million lives and at least $25 trillion. The COVID nightmare was likely preventable, and the leading theory is that it came from the Wuhan Lab, which was five miles from the initial outbreak. The speaker believes the outbreak was the result of scientists manipulating nature in a lab using technology exported from the United States, specifically inserting a furin cleavage site. The speaker hopes the executive order will do some good.

American tax dollars likely funded gain-of-function research that created the virus, according to the speakers. They mention funding from various government agencies, including NIH, the State Department, USAID, and DOD. They argue that Dr. Fauci, under whose direction the research was conducted, is responsible for teaching Chinese military scientists how to build weapons of mass destruction. They also claim that Fauci funded a technique called seamless ligation, which hides human tampering on the virus. The speakers question the justification for funding such research and highlight the involvement of USAID, the Department of Defense, and the CIA. They suggest a cover-up and raise concerns about the origins of the virus.

Speaker 1 states that documents were signed to end federal funding and private corporation control of gain of function studies, which he claims the US military and intelligence agencies began in 1947. He says that by 1969, the CIA claimed they could kill the entire US population for 29¢ a person. According to Speaker 1, President Nixon ended this research and persuaded over 80 countries to sign the bioweapons charter in 1973, but US federal officials who violate it cannot be prosecuted. Speaker 1 claims that gain of function research relaunched a bioweapons arms race and that in 2014, three bugs escaped from US labs, leading President Obama to declare a moratorium that moved research offshore to the Wuhan Lab. He asserts that China, Russia, Iran, and other countries are developing devastating weapons using AI and CRISPR technologies. He says that gain-of-function research has never produced anything good, and commends President Trump for ending US bioweapons research.

I will end all gain of function research. I will sign a treaty to end gain of function research and get all nations to agree. It's a disaster that's given us no benefits, only diseases like Lyme, COVID, and RSV, which is now killing children. There's evidence that even Spanish Flu came from vaccine research. Medical and vaccine research has created some of the worst plagues in our history. Anyone who reads "The River" will be convinced that HIV came from a vaccine program. There's very little evidence that gain of function has given us any benefits, and it's given us horrible catastrophes. The risks simply aren't worth it. I will try to end it globally and reinstate the Geneva Convention and the biological weapons charter that we signed in 1973, and make it verifiable.