TruthArchive.ai - Related Video Feed

Unbelievable news from Europe: the mainstream media is ignoring the rollout of a tyrannical government move. This development could have massive implications for families, as it is expected to reach the United States soon. The European parliament has voted to implement a digital identification program that will track and verify personal information, medical records, and movements through GPS. This program will soon take over everyone's lives in the European Union. The Federal Reserve and the Biden administration are actively working on a similar initiative for the United States.

Life is about to change for every Australian. This bill will be misused because this bill is written to be misused. No hiding behind anonymous accounts or faulted false addresses. You can expect a knock on your door at home, work, or school as we're seeing happening in other countries with digital identity already in The government knows digital ID will be compulsory by the device of preventing access to government services, banking services, air travel, and major purchases for any Australian who does not have a digital ID. The digital ID will in effect create a live data file of your movements, purchases, accounts, and associates containing reference to every piece of data being held in the private and government sector as a first step in a wider agenda.

Life in Australia is about to change with the introduction of a central digital identifier for every citizen. This legislation is seen as significant, allowing control over individuals' movements, purchases, and associations. Those who resist may face restrictions on government services, banking, and travel. The digital ID will create a detailed data file, enabling surveillance and control. Avoiding this system is nearly impossible, as it will be used to identify and punish those who speak out against the government. Expect increased monitoring and enforcement, with no anonymity or escape.

"my long term personal political view has always been in favor of ID cards." "I supported the last Labour government's introduction of ID cards." "The first bill I've spoken on in Parliament was the ID cards bill, which the then conservative Lib Dem coalition scrapped." "It wasn't in the manifesto." "my other colleagues in government have started this conversation about how we might roll out more digital ID." "I think that a system of digital ID can also help with illegal working, enforcement of other laws as well." "Forgive me, could we be in a situation where everybody would be compelled to have a digital ID at some point?" "Well, the government's position at the moment is to look at digital ID, further rollout."

The speaker argues against digital IDs, listing 20 concerns: functionality creep into immigration, healthcare, banking, voting, driving, and travel; loss of anonymity; government overreach; it won't stop illegal immigration; it would rely on phones; enforcement could be undermined by cash-paying employers; single point of failure; government as the nexus of verification; a state surveillance honeypot; inevitable future abuses by any regime; massive cost and bureaucratic drag; marginalization of those unable or unwilling to comply; UK previously rejected ID cards; examples of failures in other countries (India ANWA, EU database); authoritarian temptations; excuses for illegal immigration and labor; burden shifting to citizens; ratchet effect; not for stated reasons but globalist aims; alternative is zero-knowledge proofs where individuals hold ID; digital IDs from the state are a horrendous idea and must be stopped.

Your wake up call. The British government is pushing forward with plans for a national digital ID system. They've called it the Brit card and if that name doesn't send a chill down your spine you have not been paying attention. This is about building a centralized state controlled digital identity system that could be used to link your finances, your medical history, your travel movements, your social media activity, even your social activity in real life and more. It's quite frankly a digital dog tag and once it's clipped around your neck, you will not be able to take it off. There are active conversations now about linking spending capabilities to your digital identity. That means if your ID is flagged, limited or suspended, I don't know because maybe you said some hurt words on social media, that will mean you can't access your own money.

They're rolling out digital ID even when people don't want it? In The UK, over 2,000,000 people said no. We don't want it. The government's response? We're gonna do it anyway. And now the line is no digital ID, no jobs. They said you will not be able to work in The United Kingdom if you do not have digital ID. It's as simple as that. Just a reminder, pilot programs always start somewhere and then scale to the rest of the world. Today, it's The UK. Tomorrow, it's where you live. They will market it as if it's for your convenience or your safety, like they are doing now by saying it's to tackle illegal immigration. But once your likelihood is tied to a QR code or a government app, your freedoms can be taken away with the flip of a switch. Now it's just for a job. Soon it will be banking, travel, grocery shopping. You will be completely under control.

This is a new report from Blacklock’s Reporter about the federal push for a national digital ID. The article states that federal regulators yesterday said they are “working to establish digital credentials for the public without parliamentary go ahead.” MPs have repeatedly rejected the introduction of any national electronic digital ID systems as expensive and risky. The notice, shared by Shared Services Canada, the Federal ID Department, says: “Any new system, and here's the kicker, any new system should allow regulators to revoke credentials,” but it did not elaborate, and it did not explain if enrollment would be mandatory. The presenter emphasizes that, despite legislators’ objections, the Liberal government is “quietly going around talking about building a digital ID” that would permit credential revocation, and there is no explanation about enrollment being mandatory. The speaker frames this as part of the Prime Minister’s hidden agenda, suggesting action happens “through the back door, through these, like, sneaky little contract things.” On the political response, the presenter says the Conservative Party will oppose the move. He cites Liberal Bill C-63, described as their “massive censorship bill,” and says he tabled an opposing bill that would “keep Canadians safe online, but quote expressly prohibit the use of a digital ID,” noting that the principle is written into his bill. He highlights Conservative leader Pierre Poilievre’s opposition to digital IDs, pointing to Poilievre’s 2022 Twitter posts where he said government attempts to impose digital IDs and other intrusive tracking and surveillance are “an attack on our freedom. I will end them.” The presenter notes Poilievre has continued to tweet about the issue and has a petition linked on his Twitter page, with the message that “common sense conservatives will ban mandatory digital IDs, full stop.” He asserts that conservatives are fighting this and mentions that the story is not being reported by outlets like CBC. The presenter references ongoing efforts to expose government actions beyond what mainstream media covers, alleging that Trudeau’s censorship bills suppress such stories. He urges viewers to share the video and click subscribe, and mentions a link in the video description to a full breakdown about an investigation his colleague and another MP are asking the Competition Bureau to undertake. In closing, the presenter reiterates that Liberal leadership uses back-channel methods to push agendas, and that the Conservative Party, led by Poilievre, will do everything in its power to stop a mandatory digital ID. The report ends by highlighting the headline: “Fed's proposed national digital ID.”

A recent report from Blacklocks reveals that the Canadian government is working on establishing a national digital ID without parliamentary approval, despite MPs previously rejecting such systems due to concerns over cost and risk. The proposal suggests that regulators could revoke credentials, but it remains unclear if enrollment would be mandatory. Critics, including Conservative leader Pierre Poliev, argue this initiative is an infringement on freedom and have vowed to oppose it. Poliev has consistently voiced his opposition to digital IDs and is actively promoting a petition against mandatory enrollment. The Conservative Party is committed to fighting against this initiative, urging the public to stay informed and share this information, as mainstream media coverage is lacking.

"absolutely convinced that amongst the reasons that people travel through France, which is a safe country, to come to The United Kingdom, amongst the reasons is because it's easier to work in our legal economy than it is in other countries." "Bosses who are prepared to hire people illegally are not asking them for their national insurance card." "You must have ID, mandatory digital ID in order to work because we have to stop illegal working." "It is an automatic collection of the information by the government, so we know exactly who is working in our economy, and it will help us enforce the rules that are there." "I made a pledge that we would do whatever was necessary, pull use whatever tools, were available to deal with illegal migration. I intend to do so."

There's a coordinated global policy push for digital IDs, as the new form of government issued identification credentials. Digital IDs are not really a separate project from CBDCs and this new digital financial system. And UN documentation and also documentation from the Bank of International Settlements, they very overtly state that CBDCs and digital IDs are meant to go together. And without digital IDs, the CBDC digital finance system cannot exist. One of the reasons it can't exist without that is because of the KYC functionality built into this digital financial system. They have to know who you are. They give you a unique identifier, a digital ID, and it's inherently tied to a digital wallet. It's called building blocks. It involves refugees scanning their irises.

Speaker 0 and Speaker 1 discuss the UK government’s rollout of a national digital ID, presenting it as imminent and not merely a future possibility. Speaker 0 states that the government is rolling out a national digital ID in the UK and asserts it is happening now, not something to consider for someday. Speaker 1 reinforces the opposition to digital ID, urging a rejection of it. Speaker 0 reports that they are outside BBC Broadcasting House for a digital ID protest, framing the event as a mobilization against the rollout. Speaker 1 warns that saying yes to digital ID could lead to an inability to say no to the government ever again, not just to the current government but to future ones unknown. Speaker 0 recalls assurances that national ID cards were dead and not representative of Britain, noting that the modern version is not a plastic card but a “live connection.” Speaker 1 calls on people to raise their heads out of complacency, asserting that humans are not data and emphasizing that the issue concerns everyone’s freedom. Speaker 0 contends that what is happening is an attempt to funnel humanity into being a number, implying a loss of individuality. Speaker 1 describes a future where the ability to earn, move, buy, or speak is not a right but a permission, and permissions can be switched off, framing this as a consequence of Digital ID. Speaker 0 summarizes the topic as Digital ID: how it started, how it is being sold, and what life looks like behind a biometric paper.

The benefits are clear. Digital ID will make our interactions with each other and with the state faster, cheaper and more reliable. It will allow us to judge who has a right to be in our country and who doesn't, and so solves one of the major challenges of immigration. Facial recognition can now spot suspects in real time from live video, tracking organised criminals at borders, in public spaces, even helping find missing people. In London, live facial recognition led to three sixty arrests by the Met Police between January and October 2024, just in a pilot project. It boosts response times and helps identify suspects quickly in busy places like train stations and events. Live video from body cams and CCTVs can be used to provide real time advice to officers from a command centre or deploy resources to where they're most needed.

Mike Schellenberger argues against digital IDs: "We don't need digital IDs for any of those things. The United States just stopped illegal migration without digital IDs." He says centralizing data would undermine cybersecurity: "Having separate logins ... ensures that if one of them is hacked, they aren't all hacked." He warns that "if the digital ID were to actually link social media vaccine records and bank accounts, that would allow governments to censor and control the population." He notes Kirstarmer: "every working person must have a digital ID or Brit card." Real IDs contain embedded microchips; MDLs are digital IDs; Gavin Newsom moved driver's licenses to Apple and Google wallets. Ellison: "The secret is to get all and get all of that data in one place." China’s 2019 social credit system; UK Big Brother Watch warns it could be gateway to surveillance. Starmer: "Digital ID will make it tougher to work illegally" and YouGov: 42% in favor, 45% against; Gates documentary on AI censorship; "The Starmer government's digital IDs should be a wake up call to all of us."

The European Union has reached an agreement on the implementation of digital identity, which is concerning news. Commissioner Breton has also mentioned the possibility of introducing the digital euro, or Central Bank Digital Currency. This connection between digital identity and digital currency is worrying, as it goes against previous promises and has raised concerns among privacy and security experts. However, there is still a chance to voice opposition to this development by contacting your Member of European Parliament (MEP) and expressing your disagreement with this tool.

The European Union has reached an agreement on the implementation of digital identity, which is concerning news. Commissioner Breton has also mentioned the possibility of introducing the digital euro, or Central Bank Digital Currency. This connection between digital identity and digital currency is worrying, as it goes against previous promises and has raised concerns among privacy and security experts. However, there is still a chance to oppose this development by contacting your Member of European Parliament (MEP) and expressing your opposition to this tool.

Today, Kirstjarma made a speech where he said that he is going to be mandating digital ID for all of The UK public. You won't be able to work without digital ID. Digital ID will be linked to a social credit score. Your social credit score will go down if you are a bad citizen. You'll be told you can't do things like buy a plane ticket. If you don't wanna be a government slave for the rest of your life, you need to say no to digital ID. The NHS tried to mandate COVID vaccines to all NHS workers, but enough of them said no, and that was dropped. They couldn't do it. If everybody stands up and says no to digital ID together, they won't be able to roll it out. This is your warning. If you don't wanna be a government slave, say no to digital ID. Thank you.

Many of us warned that COVID was the catalyst for Agenda twenty thirty, a UN driven plan to put the entire earth into a digital surveillance grid that would mean the introduction of digital currency, digital ID, a social credit system where your online activities are directly linked to your ability to access money. Australia introduced a voluntary digital ID in May 2024, and as of December, just over a year later, Australians will not even be able to do a Google search without verifying themselves online. Now in lockstep, The UK has announced they will also be pressing ahead with digital ID. Digital ID will give you access to government services. One option under consideration would give digital IDs to all people legally entitled to reside in Britain, whether citizens or those with legal immigration status, the Financial Times said.

Speaker 0 announces a policy: 'Made today, I am announcing this government will make a new free of charge digital ID mandatory for the right to work by the end of this parliament.' He adds, 'Let me spell that out.' The policy states, 'You will not be able to work in The United Kingdom if you do not have digital ID.' He concludes, 'It's as simple as that.' The speaker conveys an intent to require digital ID at no cost, tying it to employment rights by the end of the current parliamentary term, and asserts that absence of digital ID would bar work in the UK, framed as a straightforward requirement.

We know the government is looking at digital ID cards at the moment. Well, Kirst Dahmer, our prime minister, has said we are looking at what other countries have done to bring in sort of digital accreditation. I think there's real actually benefits right across here from obviously dealing with illegal working, but also actually imagine if your viewers imagine that they had one credential that would allow them to access all the different government services and our public services do. I think it is an interesting idea that other countries have taken forward and we want to learn from what they've done.

Signing up for digital ID will be the last important decision you make, as it will replace your identity with a QR code linked to editable resources, including vaccination status. Digital IDs will only remain valid if you comply with conditions, such as receiving recommended or mandated vaccines, which are designed to harm you. Without a valid digital ID, transactions will be refused, and access to goods will be denied. This system extends to controlling internet usage and movement. Refusing to sign up is crucial to prevent this "digital gulag," even if it means facing consequences like losing benefits or employment. Deferring the decision and resisting collectively can defeat this system, as demonstrated by the NHS jab mandate reversal. Refuse to sign up, even at the risk of losing access to money or employment.

Key claims cited include: "It will stop illegal migration." "The United States just stopped illegal migration without digital IDs." "If the digital ID were to actually link social media vaccine records and bank accounts, that would allow governments to censor and control the population." "Real IDs contain embedded microchips that bring us one step closer to digital IDs." "Those mobile driver's licenses or MDLs are digital IDs, and they're just one more link in the chain." "A YouGov poll found that UK opinion towards digital IDs was 42% in favor and 45% against." "The good news is that the backlash to the digital IDs appears to be strong and growing, and real corruption is on display."

Have digital ID. It's been taken up on a voluntary basis in huge numbers, not least because it means that you can access your own money, make payments so much more easily than is available with others. So I think now we need to go out and make that case of the

Digital ID: what could possibly go wrong? The transcript recalls Kirstyama’s recent visit to India to meet Modi and top officials, promoting India’s nationwide digital ID system called Aadhaar. It then presents a provocative claim: cyber criminals are reportedly saying they have stolen the entire Aadhaar database—815,000,000 people's details, including names, addresses, identity confirmations, bank details, and more—and are allegedly selling the database for $80,000 at a time. It notes uncertainty about verification but says the story is circulating. The speaker emphasizes concerns about security and the practicality of such a system: if every aspect of a person’s life—passport, driving license, NHS records, criminal record, bank details, all transactions, bills, travel and flight records, vehicle taxes, council taxes, hospital appointments, arrest records, and other personal data—are stored in one place, how safe and secure can it be? The question is raised of whether the people running these systems can be trusted to protect data, given ongoing data breaches and thefts, including several large incidents in the past year within the country. There’s a rhetorical comparison to India’s example, suggesting that this is a test case for the security of a highly centralized digital ID system. The speaker notes that StarMove had previously used India as an example of how well such a system could work, implying skepticism about that portrayal with the closing line, “The ironic thing is that StarMove was just out there holding them up as an example of how well the system could work. Yeah. Right, Kia. We believe you.” Key points: - Aadhaar is India’s nationwide digital ID system. - Alleged theft of 815,000,000 Aadhaar records, with claims of selling the data in chunks for $80,000; verification of this claim is uncertain. - The aggregation of extensive personal data in one system raises concerns about security and trust in the guardians of the data. - Data breaches are frequent, including notable incidents in the past year. - The India example is presented as a cautionary reference, contrasting with prior praise from StarMove.

European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen is advocating for digital IDs, claiming they can boost emerging economies. However, Nigel Farage warns that this is about global government control and the redistribution of wealth. Von der Leyen wants a digital ID card or app enforced by the early 2030s, with France and Germany already trialing it. This ID card would contain personal information such as date of birth, gender, eye color, height, vaccine status, and financial status. Farage cautions against the dangers of this initiative, as it could lead to a Chinese-style social credit system and the loss of individual freedoms. He emphasizes the importance of democratic nation states cooperating and trading together, rather than surrendering sovereignty to unelected bureaucrats.