TruthArchive.ai - Related Video Feed

Dan Bongino calls the January 6th committee an "immoral, unethical, unconstitutional disgrace," accusing Liz Cheney of abusing subpoena power to release private texts in an attempt to silence conservatives before the 2022 election. Sean Hannity questions the committee's focus on January 6th while ignoring other riots, and asks why private citizens' texts are being released. Geraldo Rivera argues January 6th was unique because it was "unleashed, incited, and inspired by the president of The United States" and targeted American democracy. Hannity insists the president called for a "peaceful" march. Rivera reminds Hannity of his concern and frustration on January 6th, seeing an attack on democracy unfold. Bongino accuses Rivera of "backstabbing" Trump, while Rivera claims he supported Trump until he "abandoned the election results" and refused to accept the will of the American people.

People who refuse to comply with congressional subpoenas should be prosecuted and go to jail, according to the speakers. They emphasize that in America, when subpoenaed, you must show up, regardless of wealth or power. They argue that holding individuals accountable is crucial for democracy and the rule of law. The speakers express their frustration with Steve Bannon's defiance of the subpoena and call for his imprisonment. They stress the importance of respecting lawful orders from Congress and warn of the consequences for those who reject them. The lesson they want to impart is that everyone should comply with subpoenas, whether for Congress or the court. They hope the committee will go after those who defy subpoenas and hold them accountable.

Congress has little power and is offended that the speaker won't appear before a partisan committee. The speaker believes the real story goes back to 2016, with attempts to interfere with the election and overthrow the Trump administration. The speaker stands for fair trade, securing borders, and ending endless wars. Special interests in Washington can't make money under Trump, so they weaponize the justice system to prevent his return to the White House.

My issue with my colleagues is that they have all supported Donald Trump for personal gain. They begged for his endorsement and attacked him in the past. However, the real enemy is not Trump or Biden, but the deep state. I am the only one on this stage who can speak the truth about January 6th being an inside job, the government lying about Saudi Arabia's involvement in 9/11, the Democratic Party's support for the great replacement theory, Big Tech stealing the 2020 election, and the National Security Establishment fabricating the Trump Russia collusion hoax. We need someone who will speak truth to power, not someone who criticizes when it's convenient.

The speaker expresses frustration at not being allowed to testify at a Senate hearing and believes that if intelligence had been reported correctly, the events of January 6th could have been prevented. They question whether there was a deliberate attempt to hide intelligence and suggest that it may have been part of a larger plan. The speaker also discusses how the events have benefited the Democratic Party but believes it is a violation of the constitution. They emphasize the importance of a fair legal system and express concern that it is no longer perceived as such.

Dan Bongino calls the January 6th committee an "immoral, unethical, unconstitutional disgrace," and says Liz Cheney should be ostracized for releasing private texts. He claims the committee's aim is to silence conservatives and intimidate Trump supporters. Sean Hannity questions the focus on January 6th while ignoring other riots, and asks if there is any privacy left in the country. Geraldo Rivera argues January 6th was unique because it was incited by the President and targeted American democracy. Hannity insists the President called for a peaceful march. Rivera says Hannity, Ingram, Kilmeade, and Don Jr. were concerned on January 6th and wanted the President to say something. Bongino accuses Rivera of "backstabbing" the President. Rivera defends his support for Trump until he allegedly abandoned the election results and refused to accept the will of the people.

Bannon discusses his conviction, contrasting it with the release of a violent criminal, highlighting perceived lawlessness among Democrats. He emphasizes the need for a thorough investigation into the January 6th events, calling for a new committee led by Republicans to uncover intelligence failures and the involvement of various agencies. Bannon expresses determination to fight his conviction, asserting his commitment to Trump and the Constitution, and insists that the ideological battle against the Democratic Party must be won. He urges Republicans to govern aggressively and conduct oversight of the Biden administration. Bannon warns staffers involved in the January 6th hearings to preserve documents for future inquiries, stressing the importance of accountability and transparency.

Biden's DOJ is pushing to imprison Steve Bannon for contempt related to the January 6th committee, similar to Peter Navarro. Navarro is fighting his sentence, claiming he's too notorious for interviews in prison. This political move raises questions about silencing voices like Bannon's before the November election. Meanwhile, the House Oversight Committee plans to hold AG Garland in contempt for withholding Biden's interview tapes. Author Daniel Greenfield discusses fighting against the left in his book, "Domestic Enemies, The Founding Father's Fight Against the Left," emphasizing the need to confront leftist ideologies seeking total power and control.

Some Democratic members of Congress are preparing for the possibility of litigation. They're considering if they have the best teams possible to carry out their work. Some Republicans may say that Democrats are weaponizing the Justice Department, citing Trump's trial as an example. But in the United States, we are judged by a jury of our peers. Trump was found guilty in court on 34 felony charges. It's hard to make a partisan argument against that.

Joe Biden told donors it's time to put Trump "in a bull's eye." According to the speaker, someone attempted to assassinate Trump, doing exactly what Biden suggested. This follows a weaponized justice system under Biden and the Democrats, allegedly attempting to imprison Trump for life. Additionally, the speaker claims that Benny Thompson introduced legislation to remove Trump's Secret Service protection, co-sponsored by Troy Carter, Barbara Lee, Frederica Wilson, Yvette Clark, Bonnie Watson Coleman, Jasmine Crockett, Joyce Beatty, and Steve Cohen. The speaker asserts that the Democrats and the media want Trump dead, and this nearly happened. The speaker vows to not let this go.

If the January 6 committee is legitimate, then members of Congress can't hide behind the speech and debate clause if they committed felonies by destroying or suppressing evidence. When Donald Trump wins the presidency, there should be a full investigation into those in Congress who aided this activity. We need to find out who was responsible, whether there was ill intent to suppress evidence from federal investigators, and hold them accountable. If the January 6 committee is legit, then it is subjected to federal statutes. The deep state has gotten away with things for too long, so we must defeat it to have real accountability, whether it's Democrat or Republican. Electing Donald Trump is the first step.

Congressman Matt Gaetz discusses the recent sentencing of Steve Bannon for contempt of Congress and expresses his frustration with what he perceives as a biased and unfair legal system. He argues that the current administration is using the legal system to target political opponents and interfere with elections. Gaetz suggests that action needs to be taken to protect individual liberties and restore the integrity of the justice system. He also emphasizes the importance of organizing, coordinating, and filling leadership positions within the Republican Party to bring about change. Gaetz believes that more people are aligning with conservative ideas and that it is crucial to fight for these principles.

The speaker discusses the January 6th committee's legitimacy and the need to hold members of Congress accountable for any criminal activity related to it. They suggest investigating those who aided in suppressing evidence. The speaker emphasizes defeating the deep state for accountability, mentioning issues like the 51 intel letter and Hunter Biden's laptop. They predict a significant change in Washington after the truth is revealed, leading to internal accountability for criminal behavior.

Kash Patel is unqualified to be FBI director, having previously suggested shutting down FBI headquarters to open a museum for conspiracy theories. His rise reflects a troubling trend of rewarding sycophants. Regarding January 6 pardons, there’s deep concern about pardoning individuals who violently attacked police and tried to disrupt the peaceful transfer of power. This contradicts the public's desire for action against crime, not political revenge. As for potential prosecutions of January 6 committee members, there's pride in their oversight work, making preemptive pardons unnecessary. Setting a precedent for blanket pardons at the end of an administration is also undesirable. This message has been communicated to President Biden both publicly and privately.

Brandon Straub discusses the impact of the January 6th committee, particularly criticizing Liz Cheney and Bennie Thompson for their roles in what he views as a damaging narrative against Trump supporters. He shares his personal experience of being targeted by the DOJ and FBI due to his prominence as the founder of the Walkaway Movement. Despite not entering the Capitol, he faced severe legal repercussions, including overcharging and pressure to accept a plea deal based on false accusations. He expresses hope for a favorable change in administration, allowing him to share his full story after his federal supervision ends in January. Straub emphasizes the ongoing injustice faced by many January 6th defendants and the need for accountability.

Steve Bannon may avoid jail if the bipartisan legal advisory group votes 3 to 2 in favor of the House filing an amicus brief declaring the January 6th committee illegitimate. This group consists of three Republicans who could sway the decision without a floor vote. The goal is to convince the court to recognize the committee as illegitimate and allow Bannon's bail to continue. This strategy could also apply to Peter Navarro. The belief is that Republicans are actively pursuing this course of action.

Representative Cheney's statement about investigating or letting the issue go uninvestigated is criticized as ridiculous. The FBI has been investigating the issue since it happened, and over 600 people have been charged. The January 6th committee's actions are seen as an assault on Americans' liberty, with multiple batches of subpoenas issued. The committee has even sent letters to tech companies asking them to preserve communications of hundreds of Americans without informing them. The speaker argues that the committee is targeting individuals who exercised their First Amendment right to assemble and petition the government. The speaker also highlights other pressing issues, such as border security, energy independence, and rising crime rates, which they believe the committee is avoiding. They hope Republicans and some Democrats will vote against the committee's actions.

On January 6th, the speaker explains that the riot was incited by the feds because they wanted to prevent the debate and adjudication of the election in the Senate. They wanted to take away Trump's presidency and destroy the executive branch. Steve Bannon refused to testify to the committee because of executive privilege, which legally prevented him from sharing his conversations with Trump. The speaker believes that Obama's ego is controlling things behind the scenes, and Joe Biden is not the best person to run the government. The riot disrupted the planned debate, and Pence was never asked to overturn the election, just to send it back to the states for further review.

The January 6 committee was unlawfully formed by Speaker Pelosi and acted without due process, using cherry-picked and doctored video. The committee worked with regime media to blast the fake narrative of an insurrection. Secretly recorded video reveals Nancy Pelosi's documentary admitting no insurrection occurred. The shameful proceedings and media blitz poisoned the jury pool in DC. Many defendants were swept up in a vast dragnet violating the Fourth Amendment via geofencing and cellphone data warrants. The Justice Department didn't respect the protesters' First Amendment rights, unlike the kid gloves treatment of Antifa and BLM agitators in Portland. January 6 defendants haven't been dealt with in the same fashion as Antifa and BLM protesters, violating equal protection. Widespread Brady violations exist, including concealed footage around the Capitol and 800+ unreleased January 6 committee deposition transcripts potentially containing exculpatory evidence. Judges in DC seem to have come under the spell of the January 6 committee's original sin, allowing the mainstream media narrative to influence their decisions. A statute designed to close an obstruction of justice loophole is being misapplied. Antifa and BLM revolutionaries largely got off scot-free, while January 6 defendants' sentences are wildly disproportionate.

The speaker presents seven core points about the January 6 investigations and related prosecutions. 1) Original sins of government and due process concerns - The lawless formation of the House Select Committee on January 6 led to a one-sided, due process-free process. - The committee was gerrymandered by Speaker Pelosi, operated without a ranking member or counsel for the ranking member, and Liz Cheney was granted vice chair status to cover that up. - The committee conducted scripted hearings with prewritten Q&A paths and cherry-picked, highly edited audio and video. 2) Collaboration with mainstream media and narrative shaping - The committee worked with major outlets (The New York Times, Washington Post, CNN, MSNBC) to blast a narrative of an insurrection. - The speaker claims secretly recorded video shows Nancy Pelosi, her daughter, and friends admitting no real insurrection occurred. - The combined effect of the committee’s conduct and the media blitz allegedly poisoned the jury pool in Washington, DC, and suggested that venue transfers should have been permitted. 3) Fourth Amendment concerns and the dragnet - Many defendants were swept up in a broad dragnet that the speaker believes resembled a general warrant violating the Fourth Amendment. - This involved geofencing technology and cell phone data warrants to telecom providers. - People arriving after the speech and the ellipse allegedly did not see that areas normally open to the public were closed, creating a trespass trap for the unwary. 4) First Amendment rights and unequal treatment - The Department of Justice did not treat First Amendment rights of the protesters with appropriate respect. - The speaker contrasts the January 6 cases with the 2020 Portland protests, where nightly attacks on federal courthouses and antifa/BLM activity were characterized differently. - The speaker asserts that insurrection labeling in Portland was more applicable to those actions than to the largely spontaneous January 6 crowd, implying selective enforcement. 5) Selective prosecution and unequal treatment - The January 6 defendants have not been treated the same as Antifa and BLM protesters in 2020 who damaged property and threatened the White House. - The speaker calls this a flat violation of equal protection of the laws and suggests broad public belief in selective prosecution. 6) Brady violations and exculpatory evidence - Widespread Brady violations are alleged, focusing on two areas: concealed or underreported footage of the Capitol, and the large number of unreleased January 6 committee deposition transcripts (over 800), with the possibility that exculpatory evidence remains unseen by defendants and their lawyers. - The committee allegedly acted like a star chamber, and there is concern that not all exculpatory material has been made available. 7) Judicial influence and misapplication of obstruction statutes - DC federal judges are said to have been influenced by the January 6 committee’s narrative and the mainstream media. - A statute designed to close an obstruction-of-justice loophole from Arthur Andersen/Enron is claimed to be applied to activity that in many instances is protected by the First Amendment, with unequal sentencing: Antifa and BLM defendants allegedly receiving lighter outcomes or settlements, while January 6 defendants face disproportionate sentences. - The speaker concludes by expressing disagreement with the overall approach and intention to speak on these concerns.

The speaker outlines seven points regarding the treatment of January 6 defendants. First, the House Select Committee was lawlessly formed and acted in a one-sided way. Second, the committee worked with regime media to blast the narrative that an insurrection occurred. Nancy Pelosi's documentary allegedly admits no real insurrection occurred. Third, many defendants were swept up in a vast dragnet violating the fourth amendment via geofencing and cell phone data warrants. Fourth, the Justice Department didn't respect the protesters' first amendment rights, unlike how they treated Antifa. Fifth, January 6 defendants haven't been dealt with in the same fashion as Antifa and BLM protesters, violating equal protection. Sixth, there are widespread Brady violations, including concealed footage and unreleased deposition transcripts. Seventh, DC judges are under the spell of the January 6 committee and are misapplying a statute, leading to disproportionate sentences compared to Antifa and BLM, who largely got off scot-free.

We're diving into the January 6th select committee, which has not been truthful with the American people. The events of January 6th were indeed bad, with assaults on law enforcement being unacceptable. However, the narrative pushed by Democrats over the past four years is false and exaggerated. We aim to clarify what really happened and investigate why President Biden pardoned members of the committee. Since they are pardoned, they must testify, especially those no longer in office. Expect subpoenas to be issued soon.