reSee.it - Related Video Feed

What happened in Maui was a directed energy weapon attack orchestrated by Booz Allen Hamilton, not just a land grab for smart cities. It was a cover-up for child trafficking, with about 4,000 kids still missing from Maui and the Big Island. People like Michelle Flornoy, Horatio Rosansky, and Glenn Hogan Hutchins from Booz Allen Hamilton and other firms sit on the boards of Booz Allen Hamilton, Save the Children, and Care USA. Booz Allen Hamilton uses directed energy technology developed with the US Navy and Coast Guard to modify weather and deploy lasers from above, as they did in Lahaina. Jim Potter and Horatio Rosanski of Booz Allen Hamilton are key figures. Booz Allen Hamilton gets 98% of its funding from the government, using our money to terrorize American citizens.

Speaker 0 argues that anyone can file a complaint with a law enforcement authority for murder conspiracy and demand arrests and prosecutions. He points to a 2013 press release claiming that DARPA awarded Moderna Therapeutics up to $25,000,000 to develop messenger RNA therapeutics, noting that DARPA is the Pentagon and claiming the Pentagon bought, paid for, and envisioned these mRNA shots. He contends Fort Detrick was involved in developing COVID-19 at the UNC BSL-3 and asserts the Pentagon is on both sides of the argument, developing the weapon and the alleged vaccines. Speaker 1 asks whether there is any liability shield for deploying a biowarfare weapon and whether the narrative about congressional liability for Pfizer is a SIOP. Speaker 0 agrees that civil liability is separate from criminal liability, stating in his book Resisting Medical Tyranny that executives at companies developing these mRNA shots are guilty of murder and conspiracy to commit murder. He cites a Portugal report claiming that upwards of 300,000 Americans had been murdered by the mRNA Franken shots and invokes the JAB resolution, describing it as a Nuremberg crime against humanity and a violation of the Nuremberg Code. He defines a Nuremberg crime against humanity as murder, extermination, and other inhumane acts committed against civilians. Speaker 1 asks about liability for government officials who approved the vaccines. Speaker 0 says FDA officials who approved the shots could be indicted for murder and conspiracy to commit murder, noting the FDA’s involvement in developing COVID-19 as an offensive biological warfare weapon at UNC BSL-3, including a cited contract listing National Center for Toxicological Research and FDA as contributors. He claims the FDA, which approves the vaccines, was involved in this development. Speaker 1 questions the CDC and media accountability, noting the CDC’s recommendation of the vaccines and media promotion of boosters. Speaker 0 says the CDC, including Director Milensky (appointed by Biden, from Harvard Medical School), is complicit, and claims the CDC has a history dating back to the Reagan administration of handling offensive biological warfare projects, including shipping weaponized agents to Saddam Hussein with implications for U.S. troops after Gulf War I. Speaker 1 asks whether there are lawmakers with intel on gain-of-function biowarfare. Speaker 0 mentions Senator Rand Paul as having a strong understanding, but asserts that some lawmakers were threatened and obstructed after consulting him, recounting an experience with Walter Jones of the House Armed Services Committee who briefly engaged but then did not follow up, implying threats prevented action. Speaker 1 asks how citizens should respond, and Speaker 0 advocates reporting to sheriffs, district attorneys, and state attorneys, noting progress with a Collier County health freedom declaration. They discuss enforcement mechanisms, seizure, and incineration of stockpiles, and trial and sentencing for those responsible. Speaker 0 condemns China’s Wuhan Institute of Virology as a bioweapons lab, alleging it was a Chinese counterpart to Fort Detrick, with the Chinese president seeking his own BSL-4 program and an offensive biowarfare arsenal. Speaker 1 notes U.S. funding and international bioweapons labs, including Ukraine and Taiwan, and ends by referencing Lindsey Graham and a speaker labeled as a professor Boyle.

- Speaker 0 and Speaker 1 discuss the possibility that a friend was murdered and suggest that both victims died suddenly from fast-moving cancer, a method they say the agency uses overseas to eliminate people. Speaker 1 admits he cannot prove this but notes the sudden deaths. - The conversation asserts that the US government has technology to infect people with fast-moving cancer and to perform cognitive and directed-energy warfare. Speaker 0 states the government has the technology to infect with fast-moving cancer and to do so absolutely. - In 1997, Speaker 1 describes a hearing on asymmetric threats where he chaired the research committee and focused on four threats: drones, cyberattacks, electromagnetic pulse (EMP), and cognitive warfare. He asserts that cognitive warfare is now being labeled by some as Havana syndrome and that directed-energy weapons are the underlying technology. - Speaker 2 recounts a recent homeland security hearing about foreign adversaries using direct weapons against US citizens, enabling incapacitation. He emphasizes the chilling nature of the briefing and criticizes current domestic leadership as foolish, corrupt, incompetent, and wicked. - Speaker 3 notes that up to 40% of the Air Force equipment budget in the 1990s was classified, making much of it “black.” He emphasizes that military and security research often precedes civilian medical science, and that servicemen were used in experiments without fully informed consent, referencing NK Ultra-era disclosures of thousands of service members used as subjects. - Speaker 4 discusses MKUltra, describing a Canadian experiment involving psychic driving with massive LSD doses, eye-tracking, and memory loss, funded by MKUltra and affecting civilians. He mentions Project Midnight Climax, where Johns were observed in brothels while subjected to LSD, and notes similar experiments by the British Royal Air Force and Army. The results of Midnight Climax are unknown, with no published after-action reports. - Speaker 3 adds that Secretary of Energy O’Leary stated under Clinton that over a half a million Americans had been used in human experiments over four decades without informed consent, including mind control, with no accountability. He argues that mind-control technology has advanced, and questions who should govern its use, given the lack of legal frameworks. - The discussion covers mind-effects research and the lack of treaties governing such technologies. They reference a European Parliament security and disarmament resolution (1999) addressing mind-effects and mind-control technology, and Russian Duma resolutions (2002) seeking similar safeguards. Zabigniew Brzezinski’s Between Two Ages is cited regarding electronically stroking the ionosphere to influence behavior over geographic areas, connecting it to HARP and other electromagnetic carriers capable of mass or individual influence. - Speaker 6 explains historical demonstrations of electronic mind control, starting with Jose Delgado’s remote manipulation of a charging bull using radio energy and electrodes, and notes later work showing noninvasive techniques to influence behavior using low-power magnetic fields. Speaker 7 reiterates Delgado’s animal studies and the potential for noninvasive methods to affect emotions and memory, with broader implications for humans. - Speaker 3 discusses the progression of research funded by DARPA and others toward higher-resolution control of brain activity, enabling controlled effects that override senses and create synthetic memories, raising questions about future justice and evidence. They describe European Parliament and NATO/US military interest in mind-control technologies and the absence of robust legal protections. - Speaker 9 presents advances in AI-enabled brain-reading and memory-altering devices, including mind-reading and emotion decoding, while Speaker 10 and Speaker 12 discuss privacy concerns, brain-data privacy laws (Colorado’s law adding brain data to privacy protections), and the availability of consumer devices that decode brainwaves. They warn that brain data can be misused by insurers, law enforcement, advertisers, and governments, with private companies often sharing data without clear disclosure. - The segment concludes with a note that devices can infer attention and thoughts, and that DARPA’s N3D program aims for noninvasive neuromodulation with implantable electrodes read/write capabilities. It references 1980s–1990s discussions of RF energy as a potential nonlethal mind-control technology, and a 1993 Johns Hopkins conference listing low-frequency weapons as attractive options.

Good morning. I've been asked about the assassination attempt on former President Donald Trump, and I want to share my perspective. With 17 years in the military, including 14 in a special operations unit, I have experience in close protection for VIPs, including the Prime Minister in dangerous areas. The recent incident raises serious concerns. The shooter’s ability to access a rooftop so close to the president during daylight seems implausible without assistance from an agency or organization. The aerial photo made it clear that security measures were insufficient. It appears that this was not just a random act; it had to be planned, whether through negligence or strategic intent.

A speaker asks if the recipient is aware that many Americans believe a recent shooting was a coordinated assassination attempt, not the act of a lone shooter. The speaker cites the shooter's age, proximity to the target with an AR-15, drone surveillance, and being spotted with a rangefinder as reasons for suspicion. The speaker, identifying himself as a former Navy SEAL sniper, notes the obvious sniper position from a water tower. He asks if the recipient is surprised that Americans suspect more to the story, given attempts to bankrupt and imprison the target, and depictions of him as Hitler. The speaker asks if the recipient's team entered and investigated the suspect's home prior to the shooting, to which the recipient says they participated in securing it and provided bomb assets. The speaker then asks if any agents reported anything "fishy" at the home, such as silverware or trash, or if it was extremely clean like a medical lab. The recipient states he was not given those details. The speaker concludes that this is what he is hearing and finds it "interesting."

The speaker analyzes footage of a shooting, alleging it was a staged event using emergency response drill protocols. They identify individuals as "players, controllers, simulators, evaluators, actors, observers," referencing the Homeland Security Exercise and Evaluation Program (HSEEP). The analysis focuses on the actions of specific people before, during, and after the shooting, claiming their behavior suggests pre-planning and coordination. The speaker questions the authenticity of the blood, the victim's reactions, and the actions of medical personnel. They point out inconsistencies in the narrative, such as changing accounts of where the victim was shot. The speaker suggests the event was designed to further division and manipulate public perception, urging viewers to analyze the footage and share their insights. They state that something "ain't right."

School and mass shootings are unacceptable and require investigation, specifically into why they occur in the U.S. and why they didn't happen previously. SSRIs, psychiatric drugs with potential homicidal and suicidal side effects, should be investigated as a possible culprit due to their widespread use. The NIH should study why the U.S. experiences mass shootings so frequently compared to countries like Switzerland, which has comparable gun ownership. The speaker notes that children previously brought rifles to school without causing harm, highlighting the unique nature of the current issue. The speaker intends to change the NIH policy that has prevented the study of the origins of gun violence since 1996.

I'm embedded in the Pentagon, working in the joint staff, and I have experience as a former FBI agent. We discuss trafficking and I describe the perpetrator as a sociopathic narcissist. There are concerns about protecting the American people from potential threats he may pose. I'm currently in discussions with retired generals to explore strategies for addressing these issues.

In a pandemic simulation called Event 201, the CIA discussed using the pandemic as an opportunity to limit free speech and control communication. They aim to prevent criticism of government policies and discussions about a lab leak. The CIA has been conducting these simulations since 2001, practicing how to execute a coup d'etat against American democracy and the bill of rights. This raises concerns about their intentions and actions.

The discussion weaves together claims about advanced predictive technology, space programs, and a supposed timeline war. The speakers reference a “server farm of computers” used to deconstruct images to see future events, naming the Orion cube (the cube) and Looking Glass as the main technologies involved, with Looking Glass also connected to the company or project Looking Glass. One speaker presents themselves as someone with a scientific background in probabilities, noting that in a master’s thesis they “proved Nobel laureate Harry Markowitz wrong” and that their work is in empirical science. They say Grok calculated that certain events are random with a probability of “one to 2.5,” and suggest that while Grok’s calculation isn’t mandatory belief, it can be used to assess likelihood. The discussion then centers on an alleged shooter event and David Wilcock, with the speaker summarizing prior claims about Wilcock’s death and possible manipulation of his actions. They state: “It was an AI dubbed video in English,” and that they speculated Wilcock was murdered to change the timeline, noting that even if he pulled the trigger himself, he “could be manipulated in into it via mind control or radiation, weapons,” and that he talked about personality disorders and dissociation, possibly multiple personalities. The summary then lists numerous coincidences surrounding the event, including: - “UFO whistleblower died of accidental drug overdose” followed by a claim to “forget it” after agreeing to testify to Congress. - Evacuation of JD Vance before Donald Trump and a possible link to Palantir, with a suggestion it could matter to their theory. - Owen Shroyer noting the shooter appeared in an ABC News special. - A prototype for a wheelchair emergency brake being developed, noted as strange. - A shooter appearing in a BlackRock commercial, raising the idea of a “crisis act.” - A circulating photo purportedly showing a shirt with ISF or IDF imagery; the speaker leans toward skepticism about the authenticity of the IDF photo and notes a Palantir connection. - Mario Nofar deleting related posts. - Caroline Levitt predicting “there will be some shots fired,” with debate about whether that was literal or metaphorical. The speakers recount a personal anecdote: someone sitting near Caroline Levitt warned to be safe, after the national anthem, suggesting foreknowledge about danger. They discuss suspicions around foreknowledge, but stress that foreknowledge is not their main point; rather, they present a larger pattern of connections. Key names appear throughout: Henry Martinez, Cole Allen, JD Vance, Palantir, NASA JPL, CHET Propulsion Laboratory, Artemis, Orion, the Orion cube, and the “Law of One” reference to Orion. The shooter is identified by name as Cole Allen, connected to NASA JPL; Henry Martinez is tied to an Orion paper from 2014 and to a 2023 post with timing implications. The group links Palantir’s contract with NASA to the Artemis moon mission and to Orion, suggesting a broader synchronization between the Orion program, Artemis, and predictive capabilities, including a “Looking Glass” concept and a White House press release stating that “Our technologies permit us to manipulate time and space.” The overall claim is that a web of coincidences—institutional ties between Palantir, NASA, Orion/Artemis, media appearances, and time-themed postings—points to a coordinated timeline manipulation scenario, with Grok calculating an extremely low probability for these being mere coincidences (less than one in 2.5 to an enormous power). The speakers argue that the only alternative explanation is deliberate timing signaling a timeline war, and they invite further theories while promising a longer video in English with subtitles.

Take a look at what happened in Orlando. What happened? They mentioned something significant. What exactly occurred? Let's explore the details of the situation.

Trevor Coppola and Deborah Tavares discuss a NASA “war document” found on NASA’s website, emphasizing its significance and urging wide public awareness due to its content. Speaker 1 (Deborah Tavares) explains the document appeared on NASA’s site as a PowerPoint by Dennis Bushnell, the chief NASA scientist at Langley, presented July 2001, just months before 9/11. The title is future strategic issues, future warfare circa 2025. She notes the document claims, on page four, that the presentation is based on existing data, trends, analysis, technologies, with no “pixie dust,” and that the entire premise centers on robots, cyborgs, and humans—creating a conflict between stated “future” and reality at the time. She emphasizes she found shocking material on page 93. Speaker 0 (Trevor Coppola) asks about authorship and whether the public was intended to see it. Speaker 1 asserts that elites often telegraph their plans and that the NASA document was public but likely unseen by most, implying it was not widely noticed or absorbed. He/She highlights explicit statements on page 93: “capture torture Americans in living color on prime time,” followed by “terror attacks within the Continental United States using binary biologicals,” the use of an EMP, radiation frequencies against brains, and “conduct serious sigh war and collateral damage and exploitation.” The document also mentions “exploit CNN syndrome.” They reference a CIA-linked network and suggest the document involves global corporations and agencies (US Air Force, DARPA, CIA, FBI, Southern Command, Atlantic Command, Australian DoD) and that the planet is treated as a corporate realm (“USA Inc.”). They claim the document discusses beam weapons (page 45) and asserts humans are to be superseded by machines, noting fears that “humans have taken over and vastly shortened evolution” and that the bankers/global elites seek immortality and transhumanism. Speaker 1 describes other alarming concepts: microdust/microns as a weapon, a completely new legal warfare approach, and the use of frequencies (low and microwave) in warfare; reference to U.S. Army reports on smart meters and frequency targeting (site smartmetersmurder.com). They assert that frequencies will affect 100% of the population, with “canaries in the coal mine” experiencing health issues such as tinnitus, heart palpitations, skin rashes, sleep disturbances. They discuss how the elites shield themselves (cancer cures, chip mechanisms) and mention chemtrails/nanofibers as a phase in their plan, connecting this to broader depopulation and mind control aims. Speaker 1 questions how to shield the elites from their own weapons and connects the document to broader global manipulation, including social engineering, mass media control, and surveillance via metering and wireless infrastructure. They claim that the document reveals the intention to manage education, communications, and even the economy through telecommunication and metering. Speaker 0 and Speaker 1 discuss a multi-faceted strategy: to awaken the public through education of key source documents, not revolution but revelation, and to organize grassroots awareness. They reference the “Quiet Weapons Silent Wars” document (1954) and “Iron Mountain” as foundational texts, arguing they outline a strategy to control humanity and shape political systems, education, and culture. Speaker 1 promotes accessibility of sources: stopthecrime.net, linking to smartmetersmurder.com, and YouTube content by Barry Trower on weaponization of frequencies, highlighting disguised cell towers and new deployment tactics (church steeples, yucca shapes, etc.). They stress the necessity of recognizing the NASA document, moving beyond illusion to a reality defined by these texts, and propose that public education can drive solutions without violence. They warn of a reality in which technologies (drones, micro dust, beam weapons, and surveillance) could be used to take down the U.S. with minimal confirmation of fingerprints. The discussion ends with acknowledgments and a plan to direct listeners to stopthecrime.net for more information and related resources.

The Pentagon hides billions of dollars, with no accountability or audits. We need transparency. The only way to uncover the truth might be if someone leaks information online before mysteriously dying.

A speaker asks if the recipient is aware that many Americans believe a recent shooting was a coordinated assassination attempt, not a lone shooter, citing messages they've received. The speaker questions why many Americans find the situation "doesn't add up," listing details such as the shooter's age, proximity to the target with an AR-15, drone use, and being spotted with a rangefinder. The speaker, identifying as a former Navy SEAL sniper, notes the obvious sniper position from a water tower. They ask if the recipient is surprised that Americans suspect more to the story, given attempts to bankrupt, imprison, and depict the target as "a modern day Hitler." The speaker asks if the recipient's team entered and investigated the suspect's home prior to the shooting, and if they received reports of anything "fishy" there, such as silverware or trash. They ask if the home was extremely clean, "almost like a medical lab," stating that's what they are hearing.

Remember during COVID and the George Floyd protests? It seemed like money was being poured in to create outrage and destabilize the country in 2020, even though it felt artificial. It started after President Trump's inauguration with the pink hats, then transitioned into BLM and Antifa. The funding behind all of this seemed suspicious. Recently, we discovered USAID is one source. And just wait until we get to the Department of Defense and other departments! We've only scratched the surface of where this money is coming from.

America is reeling from recent attacks in New Orleans and Las Vegas, with connections emerging to Fort Bragg. The Las Vegas suspect, Matthew Livelsberger, linked to a military reality show, left behind manifesto letters in a burning Cybertruck, claiming his actions were a wake-up call, not terrorism. He warned about drones using gravitic propulsion systems, a technology only possessed by China and the U.S. Livelsberger's email detailed threats to national security and alleged war crimes during military operations. Questions remain about the authenticity of his emails and the circumstances surrounding the attack, as authorities continue their investigation. Vigilance is urged as more information develops. Stay informed and safe.

I served in the Marine Corps for 15 years, specializing in WMD. I was an instructor and worked with the Department of State. As the WMD chief, I oversaw the deployment of 2000 marines to embassies worldwide. I am also a member of the international group, Drastic, investigating the origin of the pandemic. Around 70-80% of the evidence presented to Congress comes from Drastic's findings. I worked with Major Murphy and together we released a grant proposal showing intent to create a virus similar to SARS CoV 2. Currently, I am collaborating with colleagues in Japan, Germany, and the United States, preparing evidence and affidavits for a future grand jury hearing to hold Fauci and the NIH accountable.

Initially, USAID was created with good intentions. However, the agency has broken the trust with the American people and hasn't been transparent about where our taxpayer dollars are going. In 2021, the special operations command put out an instruction manual with instructions and examples on how the military could work with the state department, intel services, and USAID using race riots in order to destabilize nations. They also advocated for setting up job fairs near some of these riots so that disaffected workers could gain employment. These operations are taking place without government oversight, without the authority of the president, without the authority of congress. USAID needs to condemn this and provide oversight to congress on exactly where our tax dollars are going. Do you agree that this is wrong?

The speaker discusses the impact of meeting survivors and first responders in the context of political coverage. They mention spending an hour and a half with victims of mass shootings and express uncertainty about the circumstances surrounding these incidents. The speaker acknowledges that the defense department believes there may be a different explanation for these events and mentions intercepting some information. They clarify that they are not suggesting Hamas intentionally caused the shootings but allude to a previous occurrence.

I certainly consider mass shootings a health crisis and we are doing for the first time real studies to find out what the ideology of that is. And we're looking for the first time at psychiatric drugs. People have had guns in this country forever. There are many other countries that have comparable levels of guns that we have in this country. We had comparable levels in the forties, fifties, and sixties and people weren't doing that. Something changed and it dramatically changed human behavior. And one of the culprits we need to examine is whether the fact that we are the most over medicated nation in the world. And a lot of those are psychiatric drugs that have black box warnings on them that warn of suicidal and homicidal ideation. So we are doing those studies right now for the first time and we will have an answer.

New information is emerging about January 6th. A new article will reveal that General Mark Milley, during the Trump administration in June 2020, authorized the use of heat and sound directed energy weapons against protesters in Washington, D.C. We have photographic evidence to support this claim, and the article will be released tomorrow, leading to further discussions about January 6th. The sound energy weapons can be set to either super audible, which deters crowds, or sub audible, which can incite chaos and violence, referred to as agitation weapons. This raises concerns about the government's role in events like January 6th, suggesting potential entrapment of citizens by their own agencies.

Deborah Tavares and Trevor Coppola discuss a NASA “war document” that recently appeared on NASA’s site, emphasizing its shocking content and what they view as a plan for future warfare involving robots, cyborgs, and humans. The conversation centers on a July 2001 PowerPoint by Dennis Bushnell, the chief NASA scientist at Langley, titled future warfare circa 2025. They highlight that the document states on page four that the presentation is based on existing data, trends, analysis, and technologies, with no “pixie dust,” and that the entire premise concerns robots, cyborgs, and humans, raising concerns about a mismatch between presented future and present reality. Speaker 1 (Deborah) notes that the document was on the NASA website and therefore publicly accessible, but questions whether the public actually read it. She points to page 93 as particularly troubling, exposing plans to “capture, torture Americans in living color on prime time,” and to conduct terror attacks within the Continental United States using binary biologicals to take down critical infrastructure. The document allegedly mentions using an EMP, radiation frequencies against brains, cyber operations, and “collateral damage,” along with “exploit CNN syndrome.” They mention other pages indicating a view that humans have become too large, heavy, slow, and costly, implying a shift toward reliance on machines and large logistical operations; it references involvement by agencies including the US Air Force, DARPA, CIA, FBI, and various regional commands, as well as international defense bodies, portraying a global corporate influence over government. Speakers discuss the implication that the document foresees, or at least contemplates, weaponizing frequencies and other technologies against the general population, including the use of beam weapons and microdust “aerosols” that can bore into lung tissue. They reference a US Army report on smart meters and frequency weaponization, noting that 100% of the population could be affected and describing symptoms such as tinnitus, heart palpitations, skin rashes, and sleep disturbances. The claim is that the elites shield themselves with advanced countermeasures, including cancer cures and chip-based defenses, while pursuing transhumanism and brain mapping; the document allegedly contemplates nanofibers, chemtrails, and other environmental modifications as part of a broad, long-term strategy. The conversation also connects this NASA document to longer-running theories and documents such as the Iron Mountain report and the 1954 silent weapons study, asserting a coordinated program of social engineering, depopulation, and mind control, with a goal of controlling education, politics, and the economy. Debates touch on artificial wombs designed to shelter and shape human evolution, telecommunication-dominated society (tele-education, tele-entertainment), and the potential rewriting of history and science through pervasive digital systems and e-books. Regarding action, they argue for rapid public education about these documents, urging people to read sources like the silent weapons, Iron Mountain, and New World Order Exposed (1969). They advocate moving toward a “revelation” rather than a revolution, warning that revolution could lead to martial law and more powerful weapons being deployed. They emphasize identifying the responsible elites and their war plan and suggest that public exposure through stopthecrime.net and related sites is essential. They also highlight the prevalence of cell-tower-based frequency transmission, disguised as ordinary infrastructure, and point to examples of cancer clusters near towers as evidence of the problem. In closing, they reiterate where to access the material: stopthecrime.net and smartmetersmurder.com, with references to YouTube series by Barry Towler on the weaponization of frequencies and the deployment of cell towers. They urge readers to read the NASA document and related sources to understand the alleged forthcoming strategies and solutions.

There is a pentagon that hides a billion dollars without any accountability, and it has never passed an audit. To uncover the truth, it seems that someone may need to leak information from these labs online, potentially facing dire consequences afterward.

Foreign adversaries are using direct energy weapons on US citizens, known as Savannah Syndrome. A classified briefing revealed the severity of the situation, leaving the speaker, a former Navy SEAL, shaken. The speaker emphasizes the importance of the upcoming election due to leadership failures.