reSee.it - Related Video Feed

The video discusses the use of famous people, like Taylor Swift, as influencers to share messages or information. It mentions how Taylor Swift's discography was purchased by the Carlyle Group, which has connections to the military-industrial complex. It also talks about her involvement in political events, such as supporting Biden in the 2020 election. The video suggests that Taylor Swift is being used as a cultural tool to influence public opinion. It mentions her appearance in the NATO Psychological Operation Center's presentation on social media censorship techniques. The speaker expresses frustration but acknowledges Taylor Swift's role as a key actor in spreading desired messaging.

There's a crucial aspect of warfare that targets the enemy's mind, not their body. This psychological warfare uses words and ideas as ammunition, aiming to influence the thoughts of enemy soldiers. Those engaged in this type of warfare are encouraged to study foreign languages and social sciences like history, economics, and sociology. A broad understanding of all facets of human behavior is essential for them. These are the SciWar soldiers.

The speaker asserts that modern warfare utilizes information, turning social media feeds into battlefields to manufacture consent. Even passive engagement, like watching cat videos, contributes to this agenda. The military-industrial complex, controlled by entities like BlackRock and Vanguard, profits from distraction, poor health, fear, and division. These institutions also own companies across various sectors, including pharmaceuticals and funerary services. The speaker urges resistance through words to manufacture peace instead of consent for war. Another speaker believes the movement against corruption is winning, potentially leading to a turning point after decades of worsening corruption. A third speaker satirically suggests Kamala Harris is endorsed by the IRS and will save the country.

The speaker discusses how famous people, like Taylor Swift, are used by organizations like NATO for psychological operations. Taylor Swift's discography was bought by the Carlyle Group, known for its ties to the military-industrial complex. She was used to promote political agendas, such as supporting Biden in the 2020 election. Swift's influence is seen as a valuable tool in shaping public opinion towards Western interests. NATO views her as a key figure in their social media censorship strategies.

We have to fight back. How do we fight back? Our influencers. They're very important. And secondly, we're gonna have to use the tools of battle. The weapons change over time. You can't fight today with swords. You can't fight with cavalry. And you have these new things, you know, like drones, things like that. But we have to fight with the weapons that apply to the battlefields in which we're engaged, and the most important ones are in social media. And the most important purchase that is going on right now is class Followers. Five followers. TikTok. What? TikTok. Number one. Number one. And I hope it goes through because it's it can be consequential. Mhmm. And the other one what's the other one that's most important? X. X. X. Oh. That's Successful. Very good.

The speaker asserts that social media feeds are the new battleground for manufacturing consent in "5th generation warfare." Even passive consumption, like watching cat videos, contributes to this. The military-industrial complex, owned by entities like BlackRock and Vanguard, profits from keeping people distracted, unhealthy, afraid, and angry. These same institutions own not only weapons manufacturers but also companies across various sectors, including healthcare and utilities. The speaker urges listeners to fight this "war" with words, aiming to "manufacture peace." The speaker believes the upcoming election is critical, suggesting that either the "CIA and the military-industrial complex" will maintain control, or a movement against corruption will succeed. The speaker expresses optimism that this movement is gaining momentum and will win the presidency, reversing the trend of worsening corruption.

Taylor Swift, the popular singer, has gained immense fame and success. The New York Times even speculated about her sexuality. Interestingly, around four years ago, the Pentagon's Psychological Operations unit suggested using Taylor Swift as a tool to combat online misinformation during a NATO meeting. They believed her influence could help promote behavior change. This proposal was real and the Pentagon pitched the idea to NATO.

The video discusses the "war on children" and how the media and corporations are influencing and exploiting young minds. It highlights the use of the mere exposure effect, where repeated exposure to certain ideas or concepts can make them seem normal or acceptable. The video also explores the role of social media in shaping beliefs and behaviors, including the negative impact it can have on mental health and the exposure to explicit content. The speakers emphasize the need for parents to be vigilant and protect their children from harmful influences. They also call for consumer action, encouraging people to support companies that do not promote woke agendas.

The violent end of the pro-democracy demonstration in China is witnessed by the world. Psychological warfare targets the enemy's mind through words and ideas. It aims to influence their thoughts and soul. It is now evolving into a new form as an integral part of combat. To be effective, the soldier is encouraged to study foreign languages and social sciences, gaining a broad understanding of human experience.

The speaker asserts that social media feeds are the new battleground for manufacturing consent for conflicts, a form of 5th generation warfare. Even passive engagement, like watching cat videos, contributes to this. The military-industrial complex, owned by entities like BlackRock, Vanguard, and major banks, profits from keeping people distracted, unhealthy, afraid, and divided. These institutions also own companies across various sectors, including pharmaceuticals and funeral homes. The speaker urges listeners to fight this "war" with words, to "manufacture peace" by withholding consent from this governance. The speaker believes the movement against corruption is gaining momentum and will win the presidency, reversing decades of worsening corruption.

The video discusses the spread of diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) policies in the United States military. It highlights conversations with individuals working in DEI roles at the Pentagon, who express their opinions on older white men and Trump supporters. The video questions the effectiveness of DEI initiatives and the lack of data to support their impact. It also mentions the manipulation of job titles to bypass salary restrictions and the potential negative consequences for those who refuse DEI training. The video raises concerns about the use of taxpayer money and the impact of DEI on military readiness.

The IDF admitted to running a propaganda channel on Telegram, showcasing brutal acts against Palestinians. The channel, 72 Virgins Uncensored, featured gore, dehumanization, and glorification of destruction in Gaza. Despite initially denying involvement, the IDF confirmed their propaganda unit was behind it, claiming freelancing. The content included genocidal language, war crimes, and atrocities celebrated by IDF soldiers. This propaganda aims to cover up the failure of military objectives, strengthen domestic support, and justify brutal actions. The IDF's involvement in promoting these atrocities raises questions about official government policy and accountability.

Taylor Swift, a popular singer, has been speculated to be a lesbian by The New York Times. It was revealed that the Pentagon's psychological operations unit proposed using her as an asset to combat online misinformation during a NATO meeting. This tactic is not new, as the government has previously used musicians like Louis Armstrong, Nina Simone, Elvis, and Michael Jackson for propaganda purposes. Swift, who endorsed Biden, is urging her millions of followers to vote and sharing links. While there is no evidence of a covert political agenda, her influence could potentially sway voters. The Biden administration's perception management team identifies influential individuals like Swift to engage in campaigns that can influence voters.

From Iranian AI Lego animation videos to the official White House account uploading this clip of, quote, operation epic fury, The US's name for its war on Iran. Since the joint US Israel war on Iran began in February, hundreds have been killed. Another front is happening, the battle online. Iran's LEGO diss tracks are targeting the American public with mentions of Epstein, the Me Too movement and Pointless Wars. And official Iranian embassy X accounts are sharing commentary and memes while the White House uploaded this, quote, justice the American way clip. You can't conceive of what I'm capable of. Finishing this fight. Yeah. I'm thinking thinking I'm on back. I'm here to fight for truth and justice in the American way. Ben Stiller, who co wrote at one of the clips used by the White House tweeted, quote, hey, White House. Please remove the Tropic Thunder While Ceylon Dorr, the White House deputy communication director, retweeted this clip with the caption. Wake up, daddy son. Both sides are using memes to score political points, filtering serious policy through Internet culture. But propaganda isn't new in war. We've seen it in Russia, Ukraine, Israel and the occupied Palestinian territories. And we've seen it in this war. Fake AI generated clips widely shared online. The Pentagon, which is the headquarters of the US Department of Defense, for example has been working with Hollywood since the 1940s and some movies like Ironman one and two were a collab with the Defense Department or music videos like Katy Perry's twenty twelve quote clip on how she found herself when she joined the army was also kebab created to normalize, shape public opinion and glorify war. Iran is also no stranger to propaganda. During the Iran Iraq war, state media glorified the military cause so effectively that hundreds of thousands of children volunteered and were put on the frontlines. States have long tried to make sacrifice appealing and today messages appear as memes online. This time however they're not asking you to join, they're asking you to laugh and pick a side. Every victim screaming in the dark. Iran got you on the play. Which raises the question, is the meme driven version being used to distract from critical reporting, undermine opponents messaging, and reinforce government policy.

The speaker discusses the manipulation of people's fears and the use of the term "military grade." They emphasize that the intention behind the manipulation is not important, but rather the fact that people were manipulated. They mention a British MP who is involved with a military unit called the 77th Brigade, which is engaged in information operations. They also highlight that a Twitter executive is a member of the 77th Brigade, which is why they refer to the operations as "military grade psychological operations." The speaker concludes by stating that people have become scared and are victims of manipulation.

Throughout history, leaders and generals have used distraction, deception, untruths, and a mix of truth in military campaigns. According to Speaker 1, the government is capable of disinformation campaigns, psychological operations, and information warfare. Speaker 1 claims to have participated in information warfare campaigns against Al Qaeda and ISIS, involving deception, lies, misinformation, and disinformation to sway the audience. Speaker 1 believes QAnon is a well-executed SIOP (Single Integrated Operational Plan) directed against the American people.

Canada’s armed forces are facing a recruitment challenge as fewer young people are willing to enlist, according to a recent audit. The CBC's Deanna Sumanac Johnson examines how the military is attempting to boost enlistment and retention. Adam Yo, in his last year of study in the University of Waterloo’s math program, is considering a career in the military after his cadet days. He believes Canada will become more geopolitically relevant due to its natural resources and strategic interests, and he would like to be part of that vision. The federal government is backing this effort with a substantial investment—an appropriation of 20.4 billion dollars intended to strengthen the Canadian Armed Forces through retention and recruitment initiatives. Yet public perception among young Canadians toward military service remains complex. In an Angus Reid survey, when asked whether they could foresee an armed conflict that would compel them to volunteer for military service in a combat role, 43 percent of eighteen- to thirty-four-year-olds said yes, compared with 55 percent of those aged fifty-five and older. Experts note that some of the hesitancy stems from misconceptions about the military. A common belief is that all paths lead to combat, whereas in reality there are a wide range of occupations available, nearly as varied as those in civilian life. To address this, military recruiters emphasize appealing to the emotional and experiential aspects of service. They advocate portraying military life as full of adventure and excitement, highlighting opportunities such as field exercises, survival training, and cutting-edge operations. Recruits also stress the importance of visible incentives in attracting young people during economically uncertain times. The current economy features high youth unemployment, and stable pay with the potential for career security becomes a key selling point. One recruit in basic training notes that salary stability is a compelling factor, especially when discussing with peers who are struggling to find jobs after graduation. The message recruiters are promoting is that a military career offers job security and a solid income. In summary, recruiters are pursuing a dual strategy: correcting misconceptions about the breadth of roles available in the armed forces and leveraging the appeal of adventure and security to attract young Canadians. They are operating within an environment of an uncertain economy and rising patriotism, aiming to make military service an attractive and stable option for new graduates and young adults. Deanna Sumanac Johnson, CBC News, Toronto.

Taylor Swift's rise to fame and influence is being questioned, with claims that she is being used as a covert political tool. The Pentagon's Psychological Operations Unit allegedly pitched the idea of turning Swift into an asset for combating online misinformation during a NATO meeting. This tactic is not new, as the government has previously used influential figures like Louis Armstrong and Nina Simone for propaganda purposes. Swift's endorsement of Biden and her urging of her millions of followers to vote has raised suspicions. While there is no concrete evidence, it is suggested that the Biden administration may be leveraging Swift's massive following to sway voters.

The transcript discusses a tactic described as the most famous and common form of influence: collaborating with famous people or main influencers to share information or a particular message. Taylor Swift is given as the example in this context. One speaker asserts a series of assertions about Taylor Swift and her role in geopolitics and information influence. They claim that in 2019, Taylor Swift was featured by NATO’s Center of Excellence as part of a “geopolitical instrument of statecraft,” and that her intellectual property and discography were purchased by the Carlyle Group, a private equity firm with connections to the Iraq war and Dick Cheney on its board, alongside the Halliburton-dominated energy interests of West Texas. They further state that the Carlyle Group and the Soros Group funded and profited from the “military industrial complex” and related energy stakeholders, who allegedly rely on the Pentagon, the State Department, and the CIA. The assertion continues that Taylor Swift had to rerecord her own music last year in order to regain control of her rights, and that she was used to support political causes, including being wheeled out for Biden in the 2020 “get out the vote” campaign. It is claimed that Time Magazine named her Person of the Year, and that The Wall Street Journal hypothesized she could be Biden’s “secret weapon” to win the 2024 election. Additionally, the speaker claims that Taylor Swift’s Eras Tour constitutes an economic powerhouse, comparable to the GDP of a top-20 nation by global GDP, and that Swift serves as a “cultural battering ram” to influence hearts and minds in favor of Western interests. The speaker alleges that in 2019, Taylor Swift appeared in a NATO Psychological Operations Center presentation as the first line of a set of personal presentation materials on artificial intelligence social media censorship techniques, used as a key actor who can be trained to spread desired messaging. The overarching claim is that Taylor Swift functions within a broader framework where famous cultural figures are leveraged by state and corporate power structures to disseminate certain messages and influence public opinion, with swift involvement described across political support, economic impact, and information control ecosystems.

My TikTok feed is full of presidential campaign content, including influencers being paid to promote certain political views. I recently got an email offering payment to make a video supporting the Democratic side. Influencers may be paid to share opinions, so be cautious about where you get your information.

The speaker explains that operatives don’t operate by flashing secret IDs or sneaking into buildings; instead, they rely on simple, routine instructions such as telling media figures not to discuss certain topics or to cut out specific content. Referencing Project Mockingbird, the speaker notes that operatives receive basic guidance in the form of talking points or directives. A recruitment scenario is described to illustrate how a Gen Z individual might be recruited. In a public setting, someone approaches the target, praises their podcast, and asks a provocative question: are you a patriot? If the target expresses willingness to consider an offer, the recruiter presents a staged process to secure compliance and loyalty. Stage one involves exposing the target to a comprehensive package of compromising material: the target’s browsing history, webcam captures from all devices, and recordings of “the most compromising shit you could ever possibly imagine.” The recruiter then praises the target’s work on the podcast and offers protection from exposure along with a monetary incentive—$20,000 per month. The target, feeling chosen and in control, agrees to the process. The speaker notes that cognitive dissonance keeps the target from seeing themselves as compromised, framing the arrangement as serving the greater good and protecting Americans. This justification helps the target align their actions with a self-image of doing the right thing. Consequently, the target may be motivated to silence others, omit certain guests, or exclude content from their podcast, under the belief that their actions are for national safety and public welfare. Even if the situation feels off, the individual may still feel they are contributing to the greater good and thus rationalize the behavior as necessary.

Speaker 0 discusses political strategy and messaging. He says he calls the woke left and the woke reich a brilliant label, noting that they’re insane but meeting on some issues. He asserts that part of the base in the United States is being challenged systematically, with funding from NGOs and governments playing a role. He emphasizes the need to fight back and to engage influencers, suggesting to talk to that community because they are very important. He states that battles are fought with the weapons available for the time, noting that swords and cavalry aren’t effective today. He mentions new technologies such as drones, but does not elaborate. He argues that the most important tools are social media, with the most important currency being followers. He identifies TikTok as number one and hopes a certain development will go through because it can be consequential. He also identifies X as another critical platform and calls it successful. He advocates talking to Elon Musk, saying he’s not an enemy but a friend, and that they should talk to him. He believes that securing both TikTok followers and X followers would yield significant gains. He acknowledges that he could discuss other strategies, but the point is to fight the fight. He believes this will provide direction to the Jewish people and to their non‑Jewish friends or those who could become friends. He concedes that success with everyone is not guaranteed and that there will be a strong counter, but the focus remains on engaging on those fronts.

The video discusses the importance of psychological warfare in influencing the enemy's thoughts. It emphasizes the use of words and ideas as ammunition to target the mind rather than the body. The speaker mentions the need for soldiers to study foreign languages and social sciences to have a comprehensive understanding of human experience. The video concludes by mentioning that psychological warfare has evolved and taken on new forms in combat.

We have an army of digital soldiers, citizen journalists who took over information through social media after mainstream media displayed unprecedented arrogance. This insurgency in politics was led by retired generals and soldiers, telling a story of irregular warfare.