reSee.it - Related Video Feed

The speaker argues against the conventional view on raw eggs and salmonella, claiming that salmonella is a beneficial bacteria and that all bacteria are beneficial to the body. They state that fear around eating raw eggs is a trick to get people to cook them, and they claim to have eaten hundreds and now thousands of raw eggs while remaining healthy. The speaker suggests that warnings about raw eggs are misinformation and asserts that people are misled into believing they are allergic to eggs, when in fact they are allergic to what the animals are fed. For obtaining the best eggs, the speaker recommends Amos Miller as one option, Nourish Farms as another, or finding a local farmer who does not feed chickens corn or soy. They emphasize that feeding chickens corn or soy leads to people feeling allergic to eggs, arguing that the allergy is a result of the feed rather than the eggs themselves. The speaker contends that the public is misled into thinking people are allergic to eggs. Addressing dogs, the speaker notes that raw foods and eggs can help a dog with hip pain, and that dogs (and cats) eat raw, implying that there are no animals meant to eat kibble and cooked foods. They conclude by stating that it makes absolutely no sense when one thinks about it, because animals do not eat like that.

The transcript argues that fears about parasites being contagious are misinformation. It states that “parasites are made by your body,” and claims they function as an indicator of heavy metal pollution, with the body supposedly producing parasites to eat toxins and help keep a person alive. It asserts that exposure to pesticides, toxins, and plastics in the body leads to this defense mechanism. The speaker rejects the idea that parasites can jump from water and spread contagiously, saying there is no contagion and that what a person does to their body results in defense mechanisms. The transcript then criticizes the use of ivermectin and fenbend, claiming they are linked to liver failure and infertility, and says taking them “destroys their body.” For those worried about metals, the transcript recommends wormwood, dragon’s blood, chlorella, borax, or cilantro as “great at detoxing metals,” and says there are no parasites that will “jump and come and get you” through water or enter the body. The speaker also compares these beliefs to concerns about raw meat. They say they have been eating raw meat for almost two years, expected to have parasites, and claims there are “no problems at all,” concluding that the remaining concern is fear used to control people’s minds and keep them fearful of everything. The transcript frames this as a broader control mechanism and says the topic is being covered for that reason.

A speaker points out a peanut and says people become allergic because, in the 1960s, peanut oil was allegedly put into vaccines “by Pfizer,” so injecting peanut oil would supposedly cause peanut allergies. The speaker claims Pfizer owns the EpiPen used for peanut allergies, citing a book that explains Pfizer’s ownership of the EpiPen, and argues that Pfizer would then both have “made” people allergic and also own the solution carried by schools. The speaker then discusses other possible reasons people report allergic reactions when they eat peanuts. They suggest that peanuts may be processed with pesticides or chemicals, or sprayed with pesticides while growing, and that individuals might be allergic to pesticides rather than peanuts themselves. They further say that if someone is not allergic to pesticides and has not had a “peanut injection or vaccine,” the remaining factor is peanut processing: most peanut butters, they claim, are boiled and roasted, meaning peanuts are cooked twice before eating and are not in raw form. To obtain raw peanuts, the speaker says one should look to Virginia, which “grows all the raw peanuts” in the shell. They describe the peanut as “good for the prostate, ovaries, for the brain,” and for “testosterone” and “estrogen,” and say it helps push food through the stomach when there is buildup inside. The speaker also claims it can help with “the big C,” listing support for prostate cancer, breast cancer, and intestinal cancers, concluding that “that was the peanut.”

The speaker describes a common situation where people come in saying they are allergic to eggs and cannot eat eggs. The speaker says they respond by asking additional questions, specifically whether the person is also allergic to corn. The speaker reports that about 50% of the people who say they cannot eat eggs are also allergic to corn. Based on this, the speaker suggests providing their eggs for the person to try and then report back, and mentions a similar approach for meat.

Speaker 0 argues that the food supply is treated with a chemical called folic acid, which is not a natural vitamin and did not exist until the 1980s. According to the speaker, folic acid is not found anywhere on the surface of the earth, whereas folate does exist in nature. The speaker notes that during pregnancy, women are told to take high doses of folic acid, and questions why a man-made chemical that didn’t exist until the eighties is deemed absolutely necessary for a healthy pregnancy. The comparison is made between folate and methylfolate, implying a distinction between natural forms and synthetic forms. The speaker also states that in the United States, the entire grain supply—flour, rice, bread, pasta, grains of any kind, and cereals—is required to be sprayed with folic acid, although this is not openly labeled as such. Instead, it is described as fortified or enriched foods. The speaker claims that these fortified or enriched nutrients are fed to children, and asserts that half of the population has a gene mutation that prevents them from processing folic acid effectively. The consequence, according to the speaker, is that when a person cannot process a high amount of something introduced into the body, it becomes dysfunctional. The speaker then connects this to a broader societal issue, describing a common scenario: a child goes to school, comes home with a phone call reporting inattention and poor ability to follow directions, and the ensuing medical response is the prescription of stimulants such as Adderall or Ritalin. The speaker characterizes this as a solution that uses amphetamines to accelerate the central nervous system to match the pace of a racing mind, rather than addressing underlying factors. Ultimately, the speaker presents a proposed solution: remove folic acid, fortified, and enriched nutrients from the diet, and observe changes in behavior. The underlying claim is that eliminating these synthetic nutrients would calm behavior and improve function, implying that the current approach relies on artificial chemistry rather than natural nutrition.

Speaker 0 discusses natural options for prostate issues, listing apricot seeds, Reishi, Shilohsan, and bee pollen as potential aids. He notes that bee pollen can be obtained raw from a farmers market and describes it as very beneficial for the prostate. He then shifts to a tech-related risk, claiming that WiFi in the house affects the prostate by “cooking and zapping” it. He asserts that keeping a phone in a pocket results in the prostate and male parts being “cooked” and that this microwaving effect leads to the shrinking of the testicles (cojones). He frames this as part of a broader claim that technology is being used to cause illness so that treatments can be sold, enabling insurance companies to profit. Regarding prostate health, he emphasizes the need to feed and take care of the prostate and all other organs, warning that neglect leads to organ failure, with the prostate highlighted as especially important. He asserts that many men are developing prostate issues and ties this to having a phone in the pocket and eating garbage, describing the situation as straightforward and not complicated. The speaker links lifestyle factors to health outcomes, stating that not eating healthily and simultaneously “cooking your cojones” is the core issue. He reiterates the idea that the combination of poor diet and constant exposure to device-related microwaving contributes to prostate problems, summarizing the cause-and-effect in simple terms.

The speaker argues that peptide companies are funded by Big Pharma, the government, and organizations and companies including Bill and Melinda Gates, Pfizer, and “Barta,” and claims that boosters are part of this system. They say “Barta” is the U.S. federal agency paired with pharmaceutical companies to develop vaccines for use in people. The speaker contrasts vaccines with “peptide vaccines,” citing “J&J and Barta,” and says they found a document titled “New Peptides as COVID-19 Vaccine Candidates” and another item on “Peptide vaccine research.” The speaker claims that peptides are “peptides as drugs into cells” and highlights “cell penetrating peptides,” describing this as the purpose of peptides when put into the body. They address the claim that the government would never poison someone by saying peptides are meant to be introduced into cells. They also claim that insulin is a peptide, stating that insulin was created by pharmaceutical companies after “vaccinating people causing diabetes,” and they specifically assert that Pfizer both makes insulin and “gave diabetes” with the COVID vaccine. The speaker further claims that HRT and TRT are also created by pharmaceutical companies, presenting these as connecting dots. They then ask what the difference is between “health influencers” telling people to take peptides and the government telling people to take vaccines, asserting that “both of them” lead to the same outcome (“a free donut at the end”) and urging people to “think about that when you’re putting this experimental stuff into your body.” The speaker’s proposed solution is to eat real food instead of injecting “mysterious substances,” linking injections to “all types of other diseases” and to “making a business down the road.” They recommend raw eggs, raw milk, raw butter, and raw meat, and conclude by saying not to “fund big pharma or the government” and asserting that the government is trying to “depopulate us.”

The speaker asserts that preservatives are toxic to the body and rejects putting any preservatives into it, stating that if what you’re consuming is not three ingredients or less (basically food), you should not put it into your body. They argue that common additives like citric acid, maltodextrin, vegetable glycerin, and soy lecithin should be avoided, describing each as problematic. Key claims include: - Citric acid is a toxic mold sprayed with aluminum, and it was created by Pfizer, so people are aware and should avoid it in supplements, food, cleaning products, and shampoos. - Maltodextrin is derived from corn that has been sprayed with pesticides and is a cheap filler. - Vegetable glycerin could come from canola, soy, or corn, and you have no idea; solvents and chemicals are used in its production. - Soy lecithin is another cheap filler used in vitamins, supplements, and foods and it causes bloating. - Xanthex gum (Xantham gum) is another additive mentioned. The speaker emphasizes keeping intake simple: if you’re eating, stick to the simplest things—meat, dairy, honey, fruit, vegetables, nuts, and superfoods. They claim all of these are single-ingredient foods. If you want to add flavor, you can use some spices, but there isn’t much needed beyond that. They criticize highly processed products, suggesting that items like cookies with many ingredients are “garbage” that will pollute the body. The speaker contends that dietary issues people encounter are often attributed to genetics, but in their view, the root cause is having “poisoned” the body with processed foods. The conclusion presented is that avoiding processed additives and focusing on simple, whole foods will lead to better gut health, whereas consuming processed, multi-ingredient products will lead to negative outcomes. The speaker closes with a blunt affirmation: “It’s great.”

The speaker makes a series of claims about peanuts, vaccines, and Pfizer. First, they assert that in the 1960s vaccines contained peanut oil, and that this was done so that when injected, people would become allergic. They state, “in the nineteen sixties they put peanut oil into the vaccines. Yes, that was Pfizer.” They further claim that Pfizer owns the EpiPen for peanut allergies, and that “not only did they inject the people to make them allergic, then they also own the solution that all the schools need to carry and all the things that need to go with that.” The speaker then discusses possible reasons for peanut allergies beyond oil in vaccines. They say that if someone isn’t allergic due to the peanut oil, it could be because the peanut has been processed with pesticides or sprayed with pesticides, since peanuts are in the ground when they grow. They add, “you might be allergic to the pesticides.” They suggest another factor is the processing of the peanut, noting that most peanut butters have been boiled and roasted, meaning they have been cooked twice before consumption, so they are not in their raw form. They offer guidance that if one desires raw peanuts, Virginia grows all the raw peanuts in the shell and claims they are “absolutely beautiful.” Additionally, the speaker asserts health benefits of peanuts, stating that the peanut “is really good for the prostate, ovaries, for the brain, for your testosterone, for your estrogen. It’s great for you pushing food through your stomach because you’ve got too much build up inside your stomach.” They then mention cancer contexts, claiming that peanuts can help with “the big C” and specify prostate cancer, breast cancer, and “intestinal cancers.” In summary, the speaker presents a narrative connecting vaccine peanut oil to peanut allergies and Pfizer’s ownership of the EpiPen, discusses potential allergy causes including pesticides and processing, promotes Virginia raw peanuts as an option, and asserts broad health benefits of peanuts for various organs and several cancers.

The speaker says they looked into “seedless watermelons” because they consider them “a mind blowing thing.” They claim that seedless watermelons are made by using an antibiotic so the fruit becomes infertile, preventing seeds from growing. They then connect this to what they believe happens after eating seedless fruit, arguing that if seedlessness is caused by making the watermelon infertile—so there is no seed and the fruit has been altered—then it will “make you infertile” in the gut lining. The speaker extends the claim beyond watermelons, saying that going into seedless grapes, seedless oranges, seedless lemons, and seedless watermelons are “Monsanto’s products” aimed at making people infertile. They say this is tied to a broader “fertility crisis” discussed by many people. In their view, the lack of seeds in food leads to a lack of seeds for people to “procreate” and “continue on” their lineage, because they argue seeds are involved in feeding fertility for both males and females. They claim that seeds “are going to feed the fertility of a male or a female” and that these reproductive parts need to be fed; therefore, eliminating the seed also eliminates fertility. The speaker advises that when choosing fruit like watermelons, people should look for “seeded watermelons.” They also say that seeds contain nutrients and that those nutrients are “the counters to many different diseases.” According to the speaker, a reason seeds are removed is that if people ate the actual seeds of the fruit, the seeds would counter illnesses. They then add that removing seeds makes it possible to keep people sick and to profit from it. Overall, the speaker’s argument is that seedless versions of multiple fruits are produced by applying an antibiotic to make the fruit infertile and seedless, and that removing seeds from food leads to infertility by removing seed-related fertility support. They further claim that eliminating seeds removes nutrients that would counter diseases, and they frame this as part of a larger system that benefits from keeping people unwell.

Cereal is claimed to be the worst way to start the day, negatively impacting brain function, gut function, and immune health. Cereal companies allegedly pay off nutrition lobbies to promote cereal over eggs, falsely claiming eggs are bad for you, while they are actually nature's multivitamin. Cereal is marketed by paying athletes and using cartoon characters to target children. The speaker claims that cereal contains artificial food dyes and preservatives that are banned in other countries but allowed in the United States due to lobbying. The speaker urges people to stop eating cereal and eat something healthy like eggs instead.

The speaker has been eating raw eggs for a couple weeks and their hair is no longer falling out. They grind up the eggshells into calcium and eat them with honey. The speaker believes the chicken flu was faked to jack up prices and make a ton of money. They claim there was no actual chicken shortage, but that the media lied to raise prices. The speaker equates this to the lack of an Epstein list and the faking of a pandemic. Another speaker mentions giving everyone a free donut every day until the end of the year for showing their vaccination card. The first speaker says that if vaccinated, you can get a free doughnut every day until the end of the year. They wear a mask for essential workers and the immunocompromised so we can return to work. The other speaker wears a mask for protection and to stay strong and healthy.

Speaker 0 argues that raw eggs are very beneficial and that there is a push to avoid eating them raw. They criticize labels that say avoid raw eggs and claim people are misinformed by health influencers who tell you to eat only the yolk; they assert there are many beautiful minerals and nutrients in the raw egg and compare it to pearl powder, which they say also benefits the eyes. They state the whole egg should be consumed, not just the yolk. They recommend consuming about two to three raw eggs per day, depending on the day. If someone experiences restlessness or nerves that are “all jacked up,” raw eggs can be very beneficial. They explain that nerves being overactive is due to over-stimulation from technology. The solution offered is to crack open an organic, cage-free, pasture-raised, whole egg and drink it, specifically noting eggs from Arizona.

Speaker 0 explains that you can lose weight eating pasta and bread in Europe, but in the United States a bowl of pasta and a basket of bread can leave you sleepy and in a bad mood; in Italy, a fat bowl of pasta makes you feel amazing. The reason given is that in 1993 the chemical industry allegedly convinced the federal government that grain supplies needed to be sprayed with folic acid, so all flour, bread, pasta, and cereal became enriched. Enriched foods are described as being sprayed with folic acid. Folic acid is labeled as a man-made chemical produced in a laboratory and not found naturally anywhere on Earth. The speaker emphasizes that folic acid is the most prevalent nutrient in the human diet. The message is not to avoid grains, rice, pasta, cereals, or bread, but to eat non-enriched versions of those foods—the organic versions.

A discussion centers on creatine circulating widely on social media, with one person saying, “I gotta take my creatine.” Another asks what the “plan” is for someone over 25 who is not taking creatine. The first speaker claims creatine “takes two chemicals to make,” and argues that creatine contains “no red meat.” They describe creatine as being made from “two chemicals which have been put into a petri dish and you’re consuming that,” and characterize creatine as “basically $30 to $40 salt.” They argue that when people say taking creatine makes them feel great, “you’re eating salt,” and suggest “Go eat some sea salt.” The speaker also alleges that some studies are “double placebo blind” but are “paid for by Big Pharma,” which they say makes creatine vitamins and other products. They cite a claim that “a person ate…three grams of creatine” and that it was “equivalent to 65 pounds of meat,” then question how that equivalence can be made if the product “contains no meat.” They conclude that because the consumer “didn’t actually consume any meat,” but instead “consumed salt,” the comparison is not possible, calling the situation “crazy.”

Speaker 0: I have three friends. All three of them had stage four cancer. All three of them don't have cancer right now at all. And they had some serious stuff going on. And what did they take? Yep. Jesus. They took some what you've heard they've taken. Speaker 1: Ivermectin. Fenbendazole. Fenbendazole. Yeah. Speaker 0: That's it. Speaker 1: Yeah. I'm hearing that a lot. Speaker 0: They drank hydrochloride something or other? There's studies on Speaker 1: that now where people have proven that they've Speaker 0: drinking methylene blue and stuff Speaker 1: like that. Yeah. Methylene blue, which was a fabric dye. Speaker 0: Yeah. Yeah. It was a textile dye, and now they find it has profound effects on your mitochondria. Yep. Yeah. Speaker 0: This stuff works, man. There's a lot of stuff that does work, which is very strange Speaker 1: Mhmm. Because, again, it's profit. When you when you hear about things that are demonized and that that turn out to be effective, you always wonder, well, what is going on here? Mhmm. How is how is our medical institutions how have they failed us so that things that do cure you are not promoted because they're not profitable?

Raw eggs are described as “very beneficial,” and the transcript claims they are presented incorrectly because people are “scared” into not believing they should eat raw eggs. It refers to labels on egg packages that say to avoid raw eggs and instead cook them, and contrasts this with health influencers who reportedly say to eat only the yolk rather than the whole raw egg. The transcript argues it “makes no sense” to avoid the rest of the egg, stating that “nature provides you with everything.” It claims raw eggs contain “beautiful minerals” and “beautiful nutrients” that are beneficial to the body, drawing a comparison to “pearl powder” and asserting that both “feed the eyes.” The speaker says they personally eat “about two a day, two to three a day, depending on the day.” A key application is presented: if someone has “restlessness” or their “nerves are all jacked up,” the transcript claims raw eggs can be beneficial and describes a cause as overstimulation from technology. It then frames a “simple solution” for calming the central nervous system: crack open an “organic, cage free, pasture raised” egg and drink it “just like that.” It specifies the eggs are “from here in Arizona.”

Speaker 0 argues that creatine is misunderstood and misrepresented. They state that creatine is made from two chemicals that are combined in a petri dish and consumed as salt, rather than derived from red meat. They assert that there is “no red meat in the creatine” and that taking creatine amounts to consuming “30 to $40 salt,” implying that the product is essentially salt and not meat. They challenge the common belief that creatine provides benefits by referencing double-blind, placebo-controlled studies “paid for by big pharma.” They claim these studies claim results from creatine supplementation, yet the speaker emphasizes that creatine contains no meat and questions how a dose like “three grams of creatine” could be equivalent to consuming “65 pounds of meat” when no meat is involved in the product. Overall, the speaker contends that the popular view of creatine as meat-derived or meat-equivalent performance enhancer is incorrect, arguing that the product is, in effect, a salt-based supplement and that the supporting research is funded by big pharmaceutical interests.

Rockefellers own the medical system and produce ivermectin with all their companies, trickling it down to others and selling in other countries—it's the same thing. It's a monopoly; we literally live in the game monopoly. After posting ivermectin-toxicity, viewers asked who I'm paid by, but the speaker says it's a pharmaceutical product and they are not paid by anybody. They caution that if you're still using pharmaceuticals after 2020, you should check yourself, referencing mask-wearing and sticker policies as part of what happened. Vitamins are described as synthetic, fake, and made in a lab, and peptides as made in a lab. The speaker concludes: Eat from food. That's what we're supposed to do.

Speaker 0 discusses claims about peanuts, vaccines, and Pfizer. The speaker asserts that in the 1960s, peanut oil was put into vaccines, and that when injected, people would become allergic to peanuts. The speaker names Pfizer as the company behind both the vaccine claim and the ownership of the EpiPen for peanut allergies, stating that Pfizer “owns the EpiPen for the peanut allergies” and that they also control the schools’ required equipment and supplies related to peanut allergies. The discussion then shifts to alternative explanations for peanut allergies. The speaker suggests that if peanut oil didn’t cause the allergies, the allergy could be due to peanuts being processed with pesticides or chemicals, as peanuts are in the ground when grown. They propose that pesticide exposure could be the culprit and note that many people who react to peanuts might be reacting to pesticides rather than peanut oil itself. Next, the speaker argues that peanut processing contributes to allergies, noting that peanut butters are typically boiled and roasted, meaning they are cooked twice before consumption, implying they are not raw peanuts. The speaker mentions Virginia as a place that grows raw peanuts in the shell and claims these raw peanuts are “absolutely beautiful.” The speaker then extols the purported health benefits of peanuts, claiming they are good for the prostate, ovaries, brain, testosterone, and estrogen, and that they aid digestion by moving food through the stomach. They extend these claims to cancer, asserting that peanuts can help with prostate cancer, breast cancer, and various intestinal cancers. Overall, the transcript blends allegations about a vaccine-induced peanut allergy linked to Pfizer and the EpiPen with hypotheses about pesticide exposure and peanut processing as allergy causes, and concludes with asserted health benefits and cancer-related claims associated with peanuts.

Speaker 0 notes a contrast: people are afraid of parasites, yet caterpillars are worms too and nobody is afraid of them. They suggest this is something to think about. They state that the body makes parasites, and when there are too many heavy metals in the body, the body will make worms. Therefore, they argue, one should be afraid of the metals put into the body—like pesticides, vaccines, toxins, and related substances. They claim that people will take dewormers made by Rockefeller-founded pharmaceutical companies to destroy the worms, and question what these dewormers actually do, asserting that they destroy your own body. They remark that it’s wild to think about these things and that the dewormers’ origin isn’t commonly known, mentioning Rockefeller and “Great Public school.” The speaker contends that Rockefeller-created synthetic dewormers are sold as poison to destroy worms, while making the worm seem dangerous when, in reality, it’s one’s own habits being the issue. They then reference doctor Joel Weinstock, claiming he was healing diseases with parasites, adding this as something to think about.

Speaker 0 says creatine is made in a lab from two chemicals placed in a chamber and heated and pressurized until they turn into liquid, with zero meat involved. When people say it worked, he claims it's because it's a form of salt. He adds that instead of eating something from Bill Gates, he would choose red raw meat or raw eggs, and suggests to think about it.

The speaker claims that the synthetic vitamin industry is a scam created by Big Pharma to sell more products. They argue that even organic vitamins are made from industrial waste such as coal tar ash, petroleum oil, black mold, and cyanide. The speaker explains that the push to sell vitamins began in the 1920s, with organizations lobbying for iodine to be added to table salt. This was followed by the fortification of milk with vitamin D and the identification of new vitamin deficiency diseases. The speaker suggests that this created a cycle of new vitamin discoveries and the need for chemical substitutes to keep people healthy.

Speaker 0 argues that the number one best anti-inflammatory food in the world is not omega-3 fatty acids or fish oils. They assert that many things create inflammation, including gluten, refined sugars, seed oils, alcohol, and junk food, and that most inflammatory conditions—especially autoimmune and arthritis-like problems—originate in the gut. They claim that no amount of fish oil will remedy this; you must change your diet. The primary food they recommend for healing the gut is the one that contains the most glutamine. They state that glutamine heals the gut, and the food with the most glutamine is red meat, specifically beef, which they designate as the best healer for the gut.

"My page is now censored like there's less people in here and there's less people seeing my page for talking about eating organic unpasteurized blue cheese." "So people used to eat a lot of blue cheese, but it wasn't until they were injected with penicillin till they stopped eating as much blue cheese as they once did." "And you can kinda figure out where the peanut allergy came from, the latex allergy, the shellfish allergy, all these different allergies, they're coming from the injections." "And guess who sells the EpiPen? The same people who created those injections that they were putting into the people." "You can kinda see what the purpose is of that. of that. You control the people because you inject them when they're young so that they can't eat things or have them go into their body later on in life."