TruthArchive.ai - Related Video Feed

The three largest asset managers in the world, BlackRock, State Street, and Vanguard, control over $20 trillion of people's money without their knowledge. These firms are major shareholders in companies like Microsoft, Apple, Disney, Pepsi, and Coca Cola. This lack of competition is concerning because when both sides of the competition are controlled by the same actors, it undermines the idea of a free market economy. The reason behind this control is that institutions like CalPERS and New York State Pension Fund, which are government actors, demand that these asset managers adopt certain racial and gender ideologies and vote shares accordingly in order to manage their money. This requirement extends beyond just California's money.

Three major corporations, BlackRock, State Street, and Vanguard, collectively own each other and 89% of the S&P 500. They are now aiming to purchase every family home in America, with a projected ownership of 60% of single-family homes by 2030. Larry Fink, the CEO of BlackRock, is part of the World Economic Forum and supports the idea of a "great reset" where people own nothing and are happy. These corporations often disrupt the housing market by making last-minute cash offers through ambiguous LLCs.

FEMA contracted Vanguard and WSP, a Canadian company largely owned by the Canadian Pension Board, for home inspections in North Carolina. Vanguard and BlackRock also own shares of WSP. Vanguard Inspection Service seems to exclusively work with FEMA. These companies will also inspect homes in Florida. Lithium's market cap was $38.2 billion in 2022 and is projected to reach $230 billion by 2031. Albemarle, a major lithium producer in North Carolina, received $150 million from the Department of Energy to reopen the Kings Mountain lithium mine, but faced local opposition. BlackRock acquired 2,220,059 additional shares of Albemarle on August 31, 2024, bringing their total to 12,183,614 shares. BlackRock owns shares in both the lithium mine company and the home inspection companies. The speaker speculates that this is a scheme to take over land for lithium mining after hurricane damage, facilitated by biased home inspections. The speaker questions why a Canadian company is involved and accuses BlackRock and Vanguard of corruption and antitrust violations.

BlackRock is reportedly suing UnitedHealth, its largest shareholder, for providing "too much care" to patients after CEO Brian Thompson's murder. The lawsuit alleges UnitedHealth, spooked by public outcry over claim denials, approved more treatments, misleading investors by not clarifying how this would impact profits. BlackRock claims UnitedHealth's shift towards honoring insurance contracts cuts into profits, devaluing their stake. Shareholders allege UnitedHealth inflated its stock price by sticking to old forecasts despite public anger and a Senate report on claim denials. UnitedHealth shares fell 22.4% after the insurer cut its 2025 profit forecast, citing higher costs in its Medicare business. The speaker connects this to broader issues of BlackRock's involvement in destructive initiatives, such as build-to-rent schemes and private equity takeovers, advocating for supporting local businesses and investing in gold and silver as safe haven assets.

BlackRock, State Street, and Vanguard allegedly own 88% of S&P firms, which the speaker argues negates the idea of a true equity market or land of opportunity. The speaker claims these three are essentially one company. The speaker asserts that investors, including Blackstone, bought up 26% of affordable homes in 2023, according to Redfin. This began with foreclosures after the 2008 subprime mortgage crisis, during which banks received a $29 trillion bailout, according to Bard College's Levy Institute. The speaker suggests banks targeted those in debt with subprime mortgages, leading to foreclosures. The speaker laments the shift from independent stores to chain stores.

Update on the World Economic Forum: Klaus Schwab stepped down; the Nestle guy who believed that water wasn't a human right stepped in as co-chair, and now he's gone. We have somebody else moving in there. BlackRock, the world's largest asset manager, runs almost $12 trillion in assets in 2024. Larry Fink points those assets toward new technologies and informs investors where the next opportunities are going to be; "The faster that we could find ways to mitigating the rising temperatures... we don't have much time... we need to be learning about these new, the new technologies and how to move forward. And as Bill Bill in his book wrote about, we we need to employ $50,000,000,000,000 to get to a to a green world." A critic counters: "$50,000,000,000,000 of taxpayer money towards an absolute disastrous hoax that only makes us richer." "Anybody who hatches a scheme that has Bill Gates laughing like a Scooby Doo villain should really alarm people at that point." "Behaviors are gonna have to change... At BlackRock, we are forcing behaviors." Missouri AG Andrew Bailey filed suit against BlackRock, State Street and Vanguard for illegally manipulating the energy markets, stating: "Over several years, the three asset managers acquired substantial stock holdings in every significant publicly held coal producer in The United States, thereby gaining the power to control the policies of the coal companies. Using their combined influence of the coal market, the investment cartel collectively announced in 2021 their commitment to weaponize their shares to pressure the coal companies to accommodate green energy goals." The piece notes that while some pause exists, "This is going full speed ahead."

BlackRock, State Street, and Vanguard are allegedly running everything, with these three being the largest shareholders in 88% of S&P 500 companies. They heavily influence defense contracts; BlackRock, State Street, and Vanguard are top shareholders in Raytheon, General Dynamics, and Boeing. The US spends $744 billion on its military, with defense spending accounting for 13% of GDP, more than the next 10 countries combined. BlackRock has $10 trillion in assets under management, more than the GDP of every country except the US and China. BlackRock influenced 31 signers to participate with ESG, totaling $70 trillion of assets under management. BlackRock and Chase are helping rebuild Ukraine with a $400 billion contract. The speaker questions how to fight this power, suggesting that these companies have enough control to fire boards and replace CEOs. With 88% of S&P 500 companies controlled, it is argued that this constitutes a monopoly, exceeding the 50% threshold. The speaker suggests that defense contractors profit from wars and people dying. They propose breaking apart these companies to foster competition, as the speaker believes Larry Fink is the real commander in chief.

This is a test case for companies like BlackRock expanding into industries that we use every day. BlackRock bought Global Infrastructure Partners. There’s a public utilities commission, a board made up of just five people appointed by the governor. A judge has already recommended against it. The playbook is: Asset managers buy the thing, often using debt, massive loans they get just because they're already rich. Utilities in regulated states have a captive rate base. The final hearing for the buyout is on September 25, and the actual decision is set to be made on October 3. The Upper Peninsula Power Company or UPCO. This was acquired by a private equity firm in 2014.

Three giant corporations, BlackRock, State Street, and Vanguard, collectively own each other and 89% of the S&P 500. They aim to buy every single family home in America, potentially owning 60% of them by 2030. Larry Fink, the CEO of BlackRock, is on the board of the World Economic Forum. Their goal is for people to own nothing and be happy. Often, when someone is about to buy a home, an LLC with an ambiguous name, which is actually owned by BlackRock, swoops in with a cash offer, pushing the buyer out of the market.

The speaker claims that corporations are essentially one "mega corporation" due to cross-ownership by a few key institutions: Vanguard, BlackRock, State Street, Fidelity, T. Rowe Price, Geode, JPMorgan, Morgan Stanley, Northern Trust, and Capital World Investors/Capital Research and Management Company. These institutions own each other. Visualizations based on an anonymous Reddit report show that BlackRock's stock, for example, is owned by other institutions like State Street, Capital World Management, and Bank of America. When these institutions are traced to their owners, and so on, it reveals a structure where corporations primarily own each other, with minimal ownership by retail investors. This pattern extends across various sectors, including tech, groceries, and housing. The speaker suggests that GameStop was an exception, but even that may no longer be true. Because these owners own each other, their interests are aligned. The speaker concludes that buying from any of these corporations is essentially buying from the "mega corporation," which siphons money to the top.

The majority of companies on the S&P 500 have State Street, BlackRock, or Vanguard as their largest shareholders. BlackRock, with a worth of $10 trillion, is only surpassed by the GDPs of the US and China. Their influence extends to defense contracts, as seen with Raytheon. This pattern is also evident in Hollywood and the pharmaceutical industry, where these companies essentially hold a monopoly. Their control is so significant that they can remove boards and replace CEOs. However, they argue that having a 50% market share does not violate monopoly laws.

The speaker points out that major media outlets like CNBC, Fox, and CNN are owned by Vanguard and BlackRock, who are also the top shareholders of vaccine manufacturers Pfizer, Johnson and Johnson, and Moderna. They mention that Vanguard and BlackRock are also the top shareholders of flight companies that have implemented strict travel restrictions and of junk food companies. The speaker suggests that this control extends to social media platforms like Meta (formerly Facebook), Snapchat, Twitter, and Google, which are all pushing the same narrative as the media. They conclude that Vanguard and BlackRock are behind it all.

Larry Fink, Soros, State Street, Vanguard, and BlackRock have significant influence in various industries, including defense contracts, Hollywood, and pharmaceuticals. These companies hold a monopoly-like control over 88% of the companies on the S&P 500. BlackRock alone has assets under management worth $10 trillion, which is more than the GDP of all but two countries. They have the power to shape people's lives, replace CEOs, and buy politicians. The military-industrial complex is a major concern, as defense contractors profit from wars. ESG (Environmental, Social, and Governance) initiatives are seen as a means of control rather than just making money. The goal seems to be about acquiring power and control rather than accumulating more wealth.

The transcript argues that BlackRock and Vanguard form an extraordinary concentration of power in global finance. It states that these two companies are the largest institutional investors in every major company, and that they also own the other institutional investors, creating a supposed monopoly over corporate ownership. A Bloomberg report is cited, claiming that by 2028 the two firms will collectively manage about $20 trillion in investments and will own almost everything on earth. Bloomberg is said to have called BlackRock the fourth arm of government because it is the only non-government entity with a close relationship to central banks; BlackRock is described as lending money to federal banks, serving as their principal advisor, and developing the computer systems used by the central banks. The transcript notes that dozens of BlackRock employees held senior White House positions during the Bush and Obama administrations and that some remain in government roles under Joe Biden. It also describes BlackRock CEO Larry Fink as a welcome guest to many heads of state and politicians, and asserts that he is the face of the company “that pulls the strings,” though it adds that BlackRock is owned by shareholders. It claims that BlackRock’s largest shareholder is Vanguard, and highlights Vanguard’s “unique structure” that supposedly makes it impossible to see who its shareholders or clients are, alleging that the elite who own Vanguard do not want anyone to know they are the owners of the most powerful company on earth.

State Street, BlackRock, and Vanguard are the largest shareholders in 88% of companies on the S&P 500. BlackRock alone is worth $10 trillion, which is more than the GDP of all but two countries. Their influence extends to defense contracts, as seen with Raytheon. This pattern repeats in Hollywood and the pharmaceutical industry, where these companies essentially have a monopoly. They have immense control, being able to fire boards and replace CEOs. This raises concerns about monopoly laws, as even a 50% market share is considered a monopoly.

The three largest shareholders of 88% of S&P 500 companies are BlackRock, State Street, and Vanguard. These companies hold significant power and influence over CEOs, who must answer their calls and hire according to their preferences. The same goes for companies in the Department of Defense, where State Street, Vanguard, and BlackRock are three out of the top four shareholders in most of these companies. This suggests that the CEOs of these investment firms hold more power than we may realize, making them the de facto commanders in chief.

BlackRock, a major investment firm, owns a significant portion of United States banks, pharma companies, and mainstream media. They also oversee a large percentage of global stock trading and manage billions of dollars in assets. Additionally, they have substantial investments in media companies like Fox, CBS, Comcast, and Disney. BlackRock is also a significant institutional investor in tech giants like Google, Facebook, and Amazon. Recently, they have been acquiring homes and driving up mortgage prices, leading to concerns about homeownership.

ExxonMobil is going to court to prevent shareholders from voting on climate resolutions. This highlights the control that BlackRock has over the stock market as one of the top shareholders in many companies. The power of shares lies in their voting rights, not just the money they represent. Oil companies like Shell and ExxonMobil have faced pressure from institutional investors to adopt climate resolutions. ExxonMobil is now trying to block a proposal for scope 3 commitments. The case was initially assigned to a judge with ties to ExxonMobil, but he recused himself. The oil industry's influence in Texas, where the companies are based, is a concern. While alternatives to oil exist, they also have climate issues. Capitalism, though flawed, offers opportunities for regular people to have a voice and create change.

Three Wall Street investment firms, BlackRock, Vanguard, and State Street, are the major stockholders of 95% of American corporations. This consolidation of ownership means that companies like General Motors and Ford, once owned by individuals, are now controlled by these firms. This situation arose from greed, with these firms strategically acquiring more and more assets. While their actions are legal, the speaker suggests that these firms influence the laws themselves.

The conversation centers on a perceived collision of finance, politics, and ideology at the highest level, framing a looming “great reset” as a plan to control money, freedom of movement, and human existence. Tucker Carlson’s interview with Alex Jones is described as opening a door to a topic mainstream outlets avoid, with the question posed: how much time remains before the great reset becomes reality? Key claims and points discussed: - The global elite, including Goldman Sachs, JP Morgan, the IMF, the World Bank, and the World Economic Forum, are portrayed as deciding in the last few years to “deal with monetary debt worldwide” through inflation, affecting corporate, governmental, and individual debt, with Trump’s stance described as accepting inflation alongside expansion of goods. - The Great Reset is depicted as a plan by leftist UN, WEF elements to implement post-industrial, carbon tax policies that will yield stagflation (high inflation with ongoing recession), described as a “perfect storm of hell on earth.” - The globalists allegedly want to create a worldwide system of “more manageable slaves” by breaking down borders, lowering all levels of economic status, and establishing small and rural city-states (reminiscent of a Hunger Games scenario) while tech and medicine are centralized above a devalued population; this is presented as the official policy for 2030. - Depopulation and resource restriction are asserted as deliberate strategies to crash the world economy, enable bank loans to fund a new cashless system, and implement a social credit system. Carbon lockdowns and 15-minute cities are described as tools for totalitarian control. - The UN’s and globalists’ aim is claimed to be feudalism or neo-feudal capitalism, a system where a few elites retain rights while others are stripped of them, an economic model presented as the oldest form of government being revived. - Elon Musk is cited as recognizing the existential threat, and the importance of mobilizing political and legislative action is emphasized. - The dialogue highlights high-level influence over policy, including John Kerry’s statements on cutting global farming, and the actions of global financial players like BlackRock. The depiction is that BlackRock’s influence over investment and ESG policies is being challenged by state-level pushback. - Recent legal and political countermeasures are noted: attorney generals winning cases in Texas and elsewhere against BlackRock’s climate and fossil-fuel initiatives; states pulling pension funds from BlackRock; public admissions from Larry Fink and shifts away from certain ESG directives in some regions. - The overarching narrative asserts that the aim is to demoralize free Western societies, to consolidate global power, and to ensure there is nowhere for free societies to escape to, thereby reinforcing a globalist control structure. Overall, the discussion portrays a globalist scheme involving monetary manipulation, demographic and political restructuring, and technological and legal controls intended to establish a new world order, with mainstream opposition framed as insufficient and the West needing to resist to preserve freedom.

Three major corporations, BlackRock, State Street, and Vanguard, collectively own each other and 89% of the S&P 500. They aim to purchase every family home in America, potentially owning 60% of single-family homes by 2030. Larry Fink, the CEO of BlackRock, is on the board of the World Economic Forum, which promotes the idea of owning nothing and being happy. These corporations often outbid individuals looking to buy homes, using LLCs with vague names that can be traced back to BlackRock.

Speaker 0 contends that concerns over rising power bills due to AI data centers are about to worsen as BlackRock and Blackstone buy up local power utilities. The piece, attributed to The New American, claims globalist equity firms are acquiring local energy companies nationwide to support AI infrastructure, provoking pushback from ratepayers and regulators. The Associated Press is cited as reporting that private equity giants are purchasing utilities to power AI-driven data centers, raising ratepayer and regulator concerns, with Oregon Citizens Utility Board noting increased public discussion at Public Utility Commissions. Speaker 0 notes a widespread anxiety about electricity costs tied to aging and expanding power infrastructure, including lines, poles, transformers, and generators, as utilities harden for extreme weather. The narrative asserts that apart from general cost increases, the core issue is the AI race, and that large international asset firms are eager to back a technology with potential for surveillance, manipulation, and control, while also seeking strong returns on investment. It claims these firms have historically used monetary power to push corporate support for climate alarmism and transgender activism, and that BlackRock and Blackstone together controlled more than $13 trillion in assets (BlackRock about $12 trillion; Blackstone about $1.2 trillion). It states only the U.S. and China have GDPs larger than $13 trillion. Concrete buyouts and investments are listed: January 2024, Blackstone bought a 20% stake in Northern Indiana Public Service Company for $2.1 billion, with the utility planning to boost green energy production afterward. In January 2025, Blackstone outright bought Potomac Energy Center, a natural gas power plant in Loudoun County, Virginia, for $1 billion, described as Blackstone’s most recent investment in power infrastructure for AI. In March 2025, Wisconsin’s Public Service Commission approved the buyout of Superior Water, Light, and Power by Canada Pension Plan Investment Board and BlackRock subsidiary Global Infrastructure Partners, with BlackRock taking a 60% majority stake. A separate deal: Blackstone bought Hilltop Energy Center, a natural gas power plant in Pennsylvania, for $1 billion, with executives Bilal Khan and Mark Zhu describing the acquisition as AI-focused. Blackstone is also seeking regulatory permission to buy Albuquerque-based Public Service Company of New Mexico and Texas New Mexico PowerCo, while BlackRock and the Canada Pension Plan Investment Board’s attempted purchase of Minnesota Power faces regulatory turbulence; a Minnesota sale could determine how such firms expand in a sector linking households, data centers, and power sources. Speaker 0 adds that the rise of AI is providing these firms with an “excuse” to control infrastructure, and mentions Yuval Noah Harari and the WEF. It cites the WEF’s “you will own nothing” rhetoric and notes Harari’s hypothetical about future irrelevance, Neuralink, and a broader agenda including surveillance, ownership consolidation, and potential reductions in access to private property. It asserts Larry Fink of BlackRock is at the WEF and CFR, and that BlackRock’s broader investments include real estate, farmland, timberland, and single-family rental homes, as part of a “build to rent” scheme. The piece warns that one corporation controlling vast natural resources and power utilities amid rising prices would be disastrous, urging citizens to resist BlackRock’s influence. It contrasts China’s influence with BlackRock’s power, condemning ESG models and the World Economic Forum’s agenda toward a “great reset,” digital currency, digital ID, and reduced access to resources. Speaker 1 interjects with a separate 1999 statement about how genetic engineering will change us and implies a need to start conversations now, arguing that one direction relinquishes power to others while the other empowers individuals to fix themselves. Speaker 0 reiterates that the conversation centers on power, AI, and control, warning against allowing a single corporation to own essential resources. The closing note references the January 1999 statement on genetic engineering, while Speaker 1 emphasizes taking personal power to fix oneself, framing the discussion as a shift in responsibility.

Three major corporations, BlackRock, State Street, and Vanguard, collectively own each other, essentially forming one giant corporation. They also own 89% of the S&P 500 and have now set their sights on buying every single family home in America. If they continue on this path, they will own 60% of all single-family homes in the country by 2030. The CEO of BlackRock, Larry Fink, is on the board of the World Economic Forum, which promotes the idea of owning nothing and being happy. These corporations often outbid individuals looking to buy homes, using LLCs with ambiguous names that can be traced back to BlackRock.

Publicly traded companies like Pepsi, Nike, and Starbucks are in billions of dollars of debt. To maximize profit, CEOs take on debt to open new markets, then make more stock available to the public. Investment firms like BlackRock, Vanguard, and State Street buy the stock, gaining enough ownership to influence corporate boards. Board members are aware that firms like BlackRock can replace them if they don't comply. BlackRock demands companies practice ESG, pushing climate change and social agendas. Failure to comply can result in the removal of board members and the CEO. Private companies like X and Bass Pro Shop are protected from this influence. Elon Musk made X a private company, preventing firms like BlackRock from leveraging it. Bass Pro Shop, controlled by its founder, doesn't promote social agendas. The speaker advocates supporting private companies and promotes his private homeschool community and books on topics like the Bill of Rights, free speech, and ESG.

BlackRock owns the four meat packers in the country, who are keeping meat prices high and cow prices low, hurting both farmers and consumers due to their monopoly. BlackRock also owns all the pharmaceutical companies. The speaker suggests initiating antitrust suits against the meat packers and regulating pharmaceutical companies to prevent cartel-like behavior.