reSee.it - Related Video Feed

Speaker 0 describes Lord Evelyn Rothschild as extraordinarily rich and powerful, claiming that historically the Rothschild wealth was hidden in underground vaults and that their secret financial records were never audited or accounted for. He asserts researchers estimate their wealth at close to $500,000,000,000,000, more than half the wealth of the entire world, noting possessions such as castles, palace mansions, wineries, race horses, and exotic resorts, and that the Rothschilds bought Reuters in the eighteen hundreds, which then bought the Associated Press. He claims they have controlling interest in three major television networks and can easily avoid media tangents since they own it. He says they owned and operated England’s Royal Mint, continue to be the gold agent for the Bank of England, which they also direct, and control the LBMA (London Bullion Market Association), where 30 to 42,000,000 ounces of gold worth over $11,000,000,000 are traded daily, earning millions weekly on transaction fees. He asserts they fix the world price of gold daily and profit from its ups and downs, and over centuries have amassed trillions in gold bullion in subterranean vaults, cornering the world’s gold supply. He claims they own controlling interest in Royal Dutch Shell and operate phony charities and offshore banking services where the wealth of the black nobility in The Vatican is hidden in secret accounts at Rothschild Swiss banks, trusts, and holding companies. He mentions Alba Lynn Rothschild as looking like a harmless gray-haired old man, but says to “make no mistake about it.” He concludes that Rothschilds and their ancestors have handpicked presidents, crashed stock markets, bankrupted nations, orchestrated wars, and sponsored mass murder and impoverishment of millions, and that the wealth hoarded by this one family alone could feed, clothe, and shelter every human being on earth. Speaker 1 reframes the Rothschilds as the head of the snake, locating their headquarters within a one-mile square in the City of London as the center of their banking dynasty that owns money supplied through central banks of almost every nation. He recalls a November 1910 secret meeting on Jekyll Island among seven of the world’s richest Jewish men to establish a central bank called the Federal Reserve Bank, naming Nelson Aldrich and Frank Vanderlip (representing the Rockefeller financial empire), Henry P. Davison, Charles Norton, and Benjamin Strong (representing JP Morgan), and Paul Warburg (representing the Rothschild dynasty of Europe). He mentions powerful men who opposed the Federal Reserve, including Benjamin Guggenheim, Isidore Strauss, and Jacob Astor, who reportedly died in the Titanic sinking. He states that by April 1912 opposition to the Federal Reserve was eliminated, and on 12/23/1913 the president signed a bill establishing the privately owned Federal Reserve System in the United States. He quotes Woodrow Wilson: “I’m a most unhappy man. I’ve unwittingly ruined my country,” and notes that a great industrial nation became controlled by its system of credit, with growth in the hands of a few men. He claims Jewish bankers and rabbis celebrated the Federal Reserve Act, and quotes Charles August Lindbergh criticizing the system as private, for profit, and not federal or reserves, with debt-based finance. He asserts that the Fed system enslaves to protect its monopoly over credit and that the Fed’s money-creating tricks enable big brother government to borrow endlessly; the Fed is controlled by Jews, Rothschild, Warburg, and Schiff, and that every Federal Reserve chairman since 1980 has been Jewish (Burns, Volker, Greenspan, Bernanke, and Yellen). He claims the “house of Rothschild” owns 57% of the stock of the privately held Federal Reserve Bank. Speaker 2 asks about the proper relationship between a Fed chairman and a U.S. president. Speaker 3 states that the Federal Reserve is an independent agency, meaning there is no other government agency overrule actions taken. Speaker 1 quotes Harold Grellis Rosenthal: “our power has been created through the manipulation of the national monetary system,” asserting that the Federal Reserve System is owned by “us” even though the name implies a government institution. He alleges a long-standing plan to confiscate gold and silver and replace them with worthless paper, claiming Jews promoted both sides of issues while the goyim fail to see who is behind the scenes, and accusing Jews of parasitically consuming production while producers receive less.

Two individuals engage in a heated debate over the financial collapse of 2024, derivatives, commercial real estate loans, and the US monetary supply. The discussion covers the risks associated with notional value in derivatives, the potential crisis in commercial real estate, and the impact of the Fed's actions on the money supply. Despite differing opinions, they end on a positive note, emphasizing the value of open dialogue and learning from each other.

In this video, the speakers discuss the Federal Reserve and its role in the economy. They mention that the Federal Reserve provides money to banks, which then loan it to the government and collect interest on those loans. This process creates new money and leads to inflation. The speakers also talk about the need for audits of the Federal Reserve and express concerns about the potential impact on monetary policy. Additionally, they mention the boom-bust cycles in the economy and how banks benefit from them. Finally, one speaker raises concerns about the struggles faced by families and the need for jobs and affordable living expenses.

Banks are attempting to change rules to avoid collapse, particularly in relation to derivatives. Derivatives are risky bets in the stock market that caused the 2008 financial crisis. Despite promises of regulation, banks continue to engage in unregulated and unreported derivative trading. A new proposed rule aims to allow big banks to avoid margin calls during periods of market volatility, essentially giving them a free pass on risky bets. The recent example of Archegos and Credit Suisse highlights the dangers of counterparty risk in the derivative market. This rule change suggests that banks are anticipating increased market volatility. Overall, politicians and regulators are aligned with the interests of banks, and the global monetary system is highly leveraged.

The Federal Reserve has significant power over the economy, but lacks scrutiny. During the pandemic, it printed money, bought government-backed securities, and provided large sums of money to favored industries, resulting in a $5 trillion increase in its balance sheet. A limited audit revealed that during the financial crisis, the Fed gave over $16 trillion to domestic and foreign banks. These actions, aimed at making the rich wealthier, have led to high inflation, which burdens American families. To address this, an amendment is proposed to require a full audit of the Fed within a year, promoting transparency and accountability to taxpayers. A yes vote is requested.

The speaker argues that Jerome Powell is keeping interest rates too high despite inflation being under control, potentially due to personal feelings about the president. Inflation is near a four-year low after five consecutive better-than-expected readings, yet interest rates remain near twenty-year highs, with mortgage rates near 7% and credit card rates above 20%. The proposed solution is for the Federal Reserve to livestream its meetings, similar to the SEC, FTC, and FCC, to provide public scrutiny of their deliberations. The speaker believes the public deserves to know what this "secret group of bankers" is doing, as they are setting the cost of money.

The speaker discusses a financial lever that could change outcomes if funding were provided at a high level. They note: "we'd have a little money if somebody would spend, I don't know, $1,020,000,000 dollars a year supporting this, we would see quite different picture." They emphasize that "$1,020,000,000 dollars a year" is not a large amount for people who have billions at stake in this game, suggesting that substantial funds are already involved at very high levels. The speaker then states the strategy or consequence of such funding: "everything and take away their assets, things like that." This hints at a broader aim to influence or disrupt opposing financial resources or holdings as part of the effort. They acknowledge that the outcome of deploying such funds would be observable: "So we'll see what comes out of that." The speaker reflects on their role, summarizing, "this broadly describes what I do," indicating that the described activities and approach are representative of their work. They conclude with a candid remark about the nature of the field: "We have in not a small not a smooth job," acknowledging challenges and the complexity of the work involved. Overall, the speaker outlines a situation where substantial funding could shift results, implicates asset-focused strategies, and positions their work as broadly characterized by these dynamics, while recognizing the difficult and non-smooth nature of the efforts.

The Federal Reserve's actions are worrisome. They've lost trillions by borrowing money at high rates (5.4% from banks, 5.3% from funds like Fidelity and Vanguard) to buy government bonds. This artificially inflates the government's perceived financial health, encouraging excessive borrowing when rates were low. This process diverts capital from the private sector, hindering business growth and job creation. Instead of the Fed holding massive balances, that money should be used by businesses for expansion and innovation. The Fed's actions are mirrored by other major central banks globally, exacerbating the problem. It's not money printing; it's expensive borrowing that harms the economy. Freeing up these funds would allow banks to lend to small businesses and stimulate economic growth.

Speaker 0 expressed disappointment with a large spending bill, claiming it increases the budget deficit. Speaker 0 connected this to the work being done by the Doge team. Speaker 1 stated that everything done on Doge gets wiped out in the first year due to the bill. Speaker 0 stated that a bill can be big or beautiful, but not both, in their opinion.

The speaker introduces docket number 1670 on the Federal Reserve's website, which discusses the Federal Reserve's actions to support interbank settlement of faster payments. The document explores the benefits of moving to a Central Bank Digital Currency (CBDC) and how it adds a new attribute to the definition of currency: social control. The speaker highlights the concerns about income inequality, financial inclusion, and the tendency of central banks to favor large financial institutions, which have led to the creation of cryptocurrencies. The feasibility of a Fedcoin is also discussed. The speaker concludes by expressing their astonishment at the content of the document.