TruthArchive.ai - Related Video Feed

Speaker alleges the Tennessee Department of Children's Services is taking undocumented kids and putting them in state's custody and the state foster care system. They are assisting these kids into getting a court order from the juvenile court that says that they're abandoned, then they get an order of abandonment and a special circumstances juvenile immigration status. They warn 'how clever and how smart cartel immigration is.' The speaker says they 'finally got my hands on a court order' showing 'how they did this right here in Davidson County.' They claim to have told state legislators, congresspeople it's 'totally illegal,' and cite phone conversations stating that 'DCS Commissioner Quinn is well aware of it and she is central to it' because she has told providers to report to her if they have any issues with undocumented kids. Huge. It is trafficking. I mean,

John Walsh's daughter, a victim of child exploitation, highlights the widespread issue affecting many children. Child Protective Services (CPS) and law enforcement often remove children from their parents without criminal charges, leading to trafficking in the adoption and foster systems. The corrupt system treats children as commodities, with little incentive to return them to their families. The speaker shares their personal experience of harassment and unjust removal of their newborn child by law enforcement. They emphasize the need for awareness, questioning the best interests of children, and taking action by examining local CPS contracts, court watching, and contacting government officials. The conversation raises questions about CPS, Frazzledrip, Adrenochrome, and Hillary Clinton's disturbing statements. An upcoming documentary called "These Little Ones" promises to shed light on these issues.

Speaker 0 describes a photo sent to Laura around Christmas last year: a 12-year-old boy with more than 50 pharmaceutical bottles in front of him, representing the prescriptions he took that year. The speaker asserts that this is about money, stating that the pharmaceutical industry and doctors aim to make children customers for life, and that if they can break children early, they give them asthma, allergies, eczema, ADD, ADHD, insulin-dependent diabetes, a long list of neurological problems, and cancers from an early age; all of those pills are the reason they do this. The speaker notes a correlation with POTS (postural orthostatic tachycardia syndrome) and links it to Gardasil and to the COVID shot, while saying it can be associated with other vaccines too because of Guillain-Barré syndrome. The speaker mentions that their daughter has Guillain-Barré syndrome. They reiterate that all of those pills, though not every child takes that many prescriptions, almost all have something—an inhaler, something for headaches, something for something—due to disruption of their immune system that happened when they were six, eight, or ten pounds old. The speaker emphasizes that this disruption is intentional and that this part is particularly sinister.

Speaker 0 describes a theory they’re exploring: every vaccine examined, and the patents and testimony from the Department of Energy, point to a 500,000-strong collection of bioweapons categories, including plague, HIV, anthrax. They claim all these bacteria and yeasts have been mutated and converted into a “hybrid gamma irradiated” form, advanced and radioactive, and that these are entering humanity. They say, regarding a nuclear stockpile, humanity itself becomes the host of these radioactive materials, since they are digital and can be activated to detonate a mass casualty event. Speaker 1 clarifies by restating the concern: they can create a pandemic at any moment by activating materials that have infiltrated our bodies. Speaker 0 adds that they have become involved in helping families legally; their law firm supports families because some school districts have become worse than during COVID, even though childhood vaccines are still largely recommended federally. They claim school districts and scientists are desperate to get these materials into children, with Catholic schools allegedly no longer honoring religious or medical exemptions. They describe children with severe reactions and contraindications being denied entry to schools, faced with truancy threats or expulsion. They insist there is nothing healing about these vaccines and call it an infiltration system necessary for AI to function properly. Speaker 1 mentions the U.S. allegedly cutting ties with the WHO, but says research by John Fleetwood shows the U.S. maintains relationships relating to vaccines and influenza, with substantial taxpayer funding. They assert that with a digital ID, one’s bank account can be cut off if they don’t get certain vaccines or comply to maintain the digital ID, arguing the agenda has continued and accelerated with AI. Speaker 0 adds that the WHO remains a standing organization but has been rebranded, and emphasizes that the United States is front and center in partnerships with the WHO. Speaker 1 introduces Biomems (biomedical microelectromechanical systems) as a subset of MEMS used in biomedical research and medical devices, noting that this has existed for years. They describe sensors under the skin that transmit data to pharmaceuticals or governments, not just pacemakers. They reference Albert Bourla, who stated that a pill has been designed to track compliance. Speaker 0 confirms: “They tell us what they're doing.”

Children are being taken from innocent parents, and there are numerous cases of abuse and misconduct within Child Protective Services (CPS). Some CPS workers have been charged with child abuse and even caught encouraging a 14-year-old foster girl to become a prostitute. There have been instances of children dying in foster care due to negligence and abuse. The system is failing to protect children, and there are allegations of human trafficking within CPS. Parents nationwide are taking action against CPS, and there are concerns about the influence of globalists and the dark workings of the occult in relation to CPS and child trafficking.

Speaker 0 describes being twenty-one months into the protocol and nearing completion. They’ve finished all frequent IV chemo and now only go in once a month for treatment, with oral daily chemo at home, resulting in much less treatment than a few months earlier. Speaker 1 asks if the alternative treatments, in addition to traditional treatment, are helping the child handle side effects. Speaker 0 confirms: “So much better. Okay. So much better.” They note a test result when doctors questioned why the child didn’t seem sicker or look worse; they backed off on some treatments to observe, and within less than a week the child experienced nausea, headaches, bone pain, and other common symptoms. They showed doctors this pattern, demonstrating that when they are not using supplements and daily support, the child becomes sick quickly. They say doctors were skeptical of their approach. Tensions rose around February after they presented a meta-analysis suggesting that some chemo is no longer shown to be helpful and may be more harmful due to toxicity. That, they say, was the last straw. They recount that doctors began to push harder and claimed they would refer to Child Protective Services (CPS) if the child did not look sicker soon. Doctors started testing at every visit for the presence of the oral chemo in the child’s blood, and it’s consistently present because it is given daily. They hired a nurse privately to come to their home at bedtime to administer the meds, and they record the process with video of the child eating the meds; the nurse signs an electronic log verifying administration. When conflicts intensified about a month ago, they had an attorney, who sent a certified letter to the clinic with evidence: the nurse’s documentation, lab results showing the drug in the blood, and observed side effects that were minimal and manageable. They point out there are other variables affecting the child’s ANC; they have twenty-one months of records showing the child’s ANC was sometimes higher even when there were no home meds. They claim the medication is metabolized faster when the child drinks milk. They mention living on an organic farm with their own cows, and that the child drinks milk. They note that taking vitamin D can affect ANC. Speaker 1 remarks on the extraordinary situation: instead of learning what is enabling the child to have fewer side effects, the state is threatening to remove the child. They ask if someone reported them and how they protected the child. Speaker 0 explains that they were told during a September visit that if the child’s ANC wasn’t below 1,500 by the October 17 visit, they would refer to CPS for suspected medication noncompliance, which would be considered neglect. Speaker 1 reiterates the surprise at labeling medication noncompliance and the state deciding what the child should receive, calling it utterly ridiculous.

The speaker delivers a stark account of a grave moral failure in British history: for decades, children across the United Kingdom, some as young as four, were groomed, trafficked, raped, beaten, tortured, drugged, impregnated, criminalized, murdered, and psychologically destroyed by organized groups. These were not isolated incidents or expressions of sexual gratification; they were sustained campaigns of exploitation against terrified, vulnerable children who were systematically trapped. Children were degraded, humiliated, and controlled through violence, threats, drugs, alcohol, and terror. They were forced to fight to carry weapons, sell drugs, and commit murder, with some made to dig their own graves. Extreme abuses are described, including petrol poured over victims and set on fire, scriptures from the Koran read during gang rapes, young children placed inside microwaves, ovens, and freezers in attempts to murder them, ouija boards used to call spirits, and animals killed in sexual acts against children. Some were passed from rapist to rapist, and not all survived; survivors faced suicide, substance abuse, or murder. The abuse extended beyond sexual exploitation, reflecting a pursuit of power and domination and the systematic destruction of a child’s sense of self. The speaker emphasizes that, years later, professionals pressured survivors to take medication or risk losing custody of their children, and victims were told they were too damaged to care for their own kids. They were removed from families, placed into the care system, and trafficked, with rapists invited into the lives and custody of the next generation. Children born from these crimes were forced into contact with their mothers’ rapists by social workers and the family courts. The professionals who should have protected them did not, and some still do not. The inquiry is exposing the scale of institutional failure: warning signs, reports, patterns, and evidence ignored or destroyed; victims dismissed as troubled, promiscuous, or consenting; children in care raped by staff and sold to gangs; parents threatened with fines or arrests for attempting to safeguard their children. The speaker notes that whistleblowers were targeted and silenced, and politics played a role. Political parties sacrificed children for votes, and leaders hesitated to confront abuse due to discomfort or concerns about appearing racist or Islamophobic. The inquiry will follow evidence into institutions, systems, cultures of silence, and places where truth has been buried, with no race, religion, profession, or agency exempt from scrutiny. Survivors are acknowledged: they were children, not to blame but failed by the system. The true scale of what happened and continues to happen is described as too large for the inquiry to fully resolve quickly; many victims may never receive justice, but the inquiry aims to be ambitious in pursuing truth. The speaker thanks MP Rupert Loh for establishing the inquiry andextends gratitude to the participants, survivors, and the team for their bravery and resilience in confronting this evil crime.

According to the speaker, big pharma breaks children through routine well visits. Healthy babies receive multiple vaccines, leading to chronic ear infections and fevers, which are treated with antibiotics and Tylenol. This progresses to eczema, gut issues, and food allergies, with doctors dismissing them as normal while administering more vaccines. The child then develops asthma and ADHD, requiring steroids, Ritalin, and lifelong medication, making them a lifelong customer. The speaker claims that mothers are brainwashed into thanking the system that harmed their children, and that a healthy child isn't profitable to big pharma.

The speaker explains how their child's case ended up in court after a meeting with BC Children's Hospital. The hospital planned to administer cross-sex hormones to the child, but the speaker objected and halted the process. The hospital then sent a letter stating that they would proceed with the hormone injections unless the speaker took legal action within two weeks. The speaker ended up in court because they did not respond with legal action. The speaker also mentions that using the wrong pronouns for their child is considered criminal violence, and they were jailed for it. The speaker confirms that their child is now on hormone pills, as ordered by the court.

This Catholic run home, the Incarnation Children's Center in Harlem, is where many HIV children end up if their parents or guardians refuse to medicate them. For years, it was the center of highly controversial and secretive drug trials on orphans and foster children as young as three months old. At the time, these assertions describe a setting and activities that have sparked significant scrutiny, with emphasis on secrecy surrounding the research and the vulnerability of the children involved. The transcript presents these points without concluding on the ethics or outcomes. Further context or details are not included in this excerpt.

States are involved in government-subsidized child trafficking, taking children and giving them to others for money from the federal government. This is due to the Adoption and Safe Families Act, implemented in 1997 by Bill and Hillary Clinton. The law takes money from the Social Security Fund and gives it to states as an incentive to kidnap babies. Each child is worth around $1 million to the state, making this a multi-billion dollar industry. Shockingly, 83% of children taken by Child Protective Services (CPS) are based on unsubstantiated allegations. Caseworkers and social workers often commit fraud by withholding and destroying evidence.

Tony Fauci allegedly engaged in illegal activities involving foster children, according to the speaker. He supposedly placed these children in foster homes across six states and handed them over to the pharmaceutical industry. Many of the caregivers lacked medical training and were immigrants from the Dominican Republic. The children were subjected to harmful drugs, causing them to become sick. Disturbing videos exist, including one where a 12-year-old tries to protect an 8-year-old, both suffering from the effects of the drugs. Celia Farber, a researcher, discovered a cemetery where Fauci allegedly disposed of the deceased children. The speaker claims that Fauci prioritized the interests of pharmaceutical companies over the well-being of these vulnerable children. The speaker also mentions additional experiments conducted by Fauci on African pygmies, which are discussed in the next chapter.

Since age 4, I've been on meds like Lexapro and Abilify that made me feel like a zombie. Foster care kids in the US are given powerful mind-altering drugs at a rate 13 times higher than other children. A GAO report reveals infants in foster care are given psychotropic drugs with unknown long-term effects. One case involved a 7-year-old on 5 risky medications. Foster parents are pressured to medicate or risk losing their child. The system profits from drugging vulnerable kids with expensive drugs.

A man states that a doctor threatened to report him for neglect if he didn't administer the K12 vaccine, which he refused due to religious beliefs and concerns about autism. He says the family was switching hospitals due to constant pressure to vaccinate, despite their repeated refusals. After he informed the doctor of the change, the doctor allegedly threatened to file a report unless he provided the child's medical history or agreed to vaccination. The man refused and the doctor eventually relented after a superior intervened. He claims that DCF then began harassing them, demanding a home visit, which he refused, stating he didn't consent to their services. He says that authorities later surrounded their house and that he and his family were later confronted with 15-20 guns pointed at them. He questions why an Amber Alert wasn't issued if his children were truly in danger and expresses shock at being separated from his family.

The Division of Child and Family Services in Utah tried to force Parker Jensen's parents to have him undergo chemotherapy for Ewing sarcoma. Despite negative test results, doctors insisted on chemotherapy. The Jensens discovered that a doctor had pressured the lab to diagnose Parker with Ewing sarcoma in order to keep a clinical trial running. The family sought a second opinion from the Brzezinski Institute, but warrants were issued for their arrest. They were charged with kidnapping and medical neglect. The case is ongoing, with the Jensens fighting for their right to decide what is best for their son.

Speaker 0 challenges the doctor, asking if they are being forced to put their child on ADHD medicine or risk CPS involvement. Speaker 1 asserts that the medication is recommended for the child and that following the doctor’s instructions is in the child’s best interest. The doctor states they will be forced to call CPS if the guidance isn’t followed and emphasizes doing what’s best for the child, framing it as not a favor but a necessity. Speaker 0 contends the child has not shown ADHD symptoms and asks for a second opinion, to which Speaker 1 responds that they are the doctor. Speaker 0 reiterates that they are being told either to put the child on medication or CPS will be called, calling this forcing. The doctor clarifies that they asked about a second opinion, maintains they are the doctor, and says if the patient doesn’t trust their doctor, they shouldn’t be coming there, which Speaker 0 finds unreasonable. Speaker 1 repeats that they are not threatening, but are trying to do what’s best for the patient and their child, and adds that if you love your child enough you will listen to their words. Speaker 0 pushes back, stating you cannot tell them how to feel about loving their child, and reiterates that the doctor is still the doctor, with Speaker 1 acknowledging the child’s importance but underscoring their medical role.

This is the story of Maddie, a 12-year-old girl who participated in Pfizer's COVID vaccine study for children. After receiving the second dose, Maddie experienced severe symptoms including chest pain, abdominal pain, and loss of feeling in her legs. Despite her deteriorating condition, doctors dismissed her symptoms as anxiety. Maddie was hospitalized multiple times and diagnosed with chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy. The family believes that Pfizer, the FDA, and the study leaders tried to cover up Maddie's case. The FDA granted emergency use of Pfizer's vaccine for children based on this study, but there were no official hearings on vaccine side effects. The family's trust in the government and medical professionals has been shattered.

In this exchange, Speaker 0 challenges a doctor’s stance on treating a child for ADHD. The doctor states, “this is what’s recommended for your kid. You have to put your kid on these meds,” saying, “I’m trying to do you a favor. Not even do you a favor. Do what’s best for your child,” and adds, “if you don’t follow these instructions, ma’am, I will be forced to call CPS.” The parent presses back, asking, “You’re forcing me? You’re saying either I put my kid on medication that they don’t need I will be forced to call CPS,” and asserts that the doctor is jeopardizing the child’s future. The parent clarifies that the child has “not shown any symptoms of ADHD” and requests a second opinion. The doctor replies, “I am your second opinion. I’m the doctor,” and when the parent insists, “No. You’re not,” the doctor insists that they are the authority: “I’m your doctor. If you don’t trust your doctor, then you shouldn’t be coming here.” The parent questions trust, suggesting that if they trusted the doctor, they wouldn’t feel threatened by CPS, to which the doctor responds that it’s not a threat, but an effort to do what’s best for both the parent and child. The doctor reiterates, “If you love your kid enough, then you will listen to my…” as the conversation ends, with the implication that the doctor believes compliance is essential for the child’s welfare. The exchange centers on a clash between parental autonomy and medical recommendations, with CPS being invoked as a potential consequence for not adhering to the prescribed ADHD medication plan.

Speaker 0 asserts: I’m not suicidal. Any creator, politician, or celebrity who tries to make a film or documentary on CPS has wound up dead, including a senator. The November film will be their hardest hitting, and they will “rip the veil off” to the point where CPS shows up at your door. Our government is running the world’s largest child trafficking network. They emphasize they would never kill themselves, do drugs, or put themselves in dangerous environments; if anything happens to them, it is the United States government. They watched the first take of the film and say, “they’re gonna kill me.” They urge a trip down memory lane to discuss Pizzagate, stating this is where it all starts. Speaker 1 begins by saying the Pizzagate story has outrageous connections and promising brand-new whistleblower information that will blow minds. They provide an overview: back to Bill and Hillary Clinton, whom many believe to be child pedophiles. They say there’s never been direct evidence, but in 02/2016 WikiLeaks published Hillary Clinton emails with John Podesta showing coded language about a child trafficking ring centered in a Washington, DC pizza restaurant basement at Comet Ping Pong. Edgar Maddison Welch went to the restaurant with firearms to “liberate the children,” but no one was hurt; it was later said there wasn’t a basement, so the scandal was dismissed, though there’s more to the story. The transcript then ties Hillary Clinton to Laura Silsbee, who was involved in trafficking, and outlines a chain: Hillary Clinton and Laura Silsbee exchanged documents detailing logistics of trafficking children from Haiti to Boise, Idaho. Laura Silsbee had previously kidnapped several dozen children from Haiti and attempted to cross into the Dominican Republic; she was caught and the children were returned to their families. Shawnee M. King is cited for reporting on Silsbee’s case. Jorge Puello, an attorney for Silsbee’s group, was suspected of leading an international trafficking ring; Puello was arrested in investigations by ICE and Homeland Security; his wife faced charges of sexual exploitation of minors and women. The narrative claims Hillary Clinton and Laura Silsbee were connected; Bill and Hillary Clinton allegedly helped negotiate the release of Laura Silsbee and her accomplices after their imprisonment in Haiti. Speaker 1 then ties the connections to CPS: the number-one source of child trafficking is the U.S. CPS system, and the number-one gateway to sex trafficking in America is the foster care system. The foster care system allegedly lost over 100,000 children in the last twenty years, raised questions about where they went, and claims millions of children are abused in foster care by financially compensated foster parents and social workers. The Adoptive Safe Families Act (ASFA), championed by Hillary Clinton and signed by Bill Clinton in 1997, supposedly created and financed CPS/foster care by diverting Social Security funds to 50 states, giving a financial incentive to “kidnap” children. It is claimed that CPS targets poor and minority children and single-parent families, and that the system now functions as a government-subsidized child-trafficking ring. Speaker 1 lists correlations: CPS is a tool used to target conservatives; CPS offices get paid per child kidnapped; 83% of removals lack proof of abuse. The claim is that Hillary Clinton created the system and that Laura Silsbee, a friend of Clinton, is involved in Idaho’s CPS network. Laura Silsbee allegedly works with Idaho Department of Health and Welfare (IDHW) and is a registered foster care parent in Idaho, receiving monthly payments for children in her custody, as shown by whistleblower-provided screenshots. Idaho’s Attorney General Raul Labrador opened an investigation into IDHW financial misappropriations, but Idaho’s Department director Dave Jepison resigned and disappeared, and Judge Lynn Norton allegedly issued an order halting the AG’s investigation. The Idaho Department of Health and Welfare allegedly dominates Idaho’s budget, and Laura Silsbee’s role with IDHW is framed as proof of a nationwide system. The narrative concludes by warning Idahoans to beware of Laura Silsbee (aka Laura Gaylor), Judge Norton, and supporters of IDHW, asserting that the system extends to all 50 states, including Arizona, Texas, and Florida, which are described as among the worst offenders in CPS corruption.

Our next witness is miss Polly Tommy. Miss Tommy is the director of children's health defense. My son, Billy, entered the world as a healthy, perfect baby with an Apgar score that reflected his perfection. The day he received the MMR vaccine hours after the vaccination, Billy's perfect world shattered. He became lethargic, sleeping for long stretches. My husband came home that afternoon and went to check on him, Billy was convulsing. His tiny body gripped by seizures. We rushed him to hospital desperate for answers, but the doctors, after hearing he'd had the MMR said, it's perfectly normal, it's perfectly common. Lots of children have seizures. He'll be fine. No more Pfizer sponsored science.

We're outside the Supreme Court, where a case about Tennessee's gender-affirming care is being heard. This practice is viewed as harmful, akin to child abuse. The concern is that children are being subjected to hormone treatments that could have devastating, permanent effects. Kids should not be treated like experiments or given hormones irresponsibly. This care should not be funded by the government, as it is seen as nonsensical and damaging. The situation is alarming and raises significant ethical concerns.

One of the companies set up in Washington is a medical coding research company. The speaker claims that Obamacare was created solely for child trafficking purposes. They mention the existence of three supercomputers in a Texas university that track pregnant women and their children, collecting information such as hair color, eye color, blood type, and DNA. The speaker asserts that the coding system used in Obamacare removed doctor-patient confidentiality worldwide. They also mention instances of medical kidnapping, where Child Protective Services (CPS) obtains medical records and quickly removes children from their parents based on various grounds. The speaker suggests that CPS leases space in hospitals for this purpose.

The speaker's daughter was almost put on a ventilator based on incorrect test results. The speaker challenged the doctor's decision and discovered the numbers were inaccurate. The daughter was not given certain treatments and the speaker was removed from the hospital for questioning protocols. The daughter's oxygen levels were misrepresented, leading to her death from respiratory failure caused by a sedation drug. The speaker's advocacy was absent for 44 hours, during which the daughter's sedation was increased, ultimately contributing to her death. The hospital's negligence led to the daughter's death.

Tony Fauci allegedly engaged in illegal activities involving foster children, according to the speaker. He supposedly placed these children in foster homes across six states and handed them over to the pharmaceutical industry. The speaker claims that the individuals running these homes lacked medical training and were mostly immigrants from the Dominican Republic. The children were allegedly subjected to torture and forced to take drugs that made them sick. The speaker mentions a documentary showing a 12-year-old child with a tube in his stomach, urging others to comply with the drugs. The speaker also mentions a researcher who discovered a cemetery where Fauci allegedly disposed of the children's corpses. The speaker accuses Fauci of treating these children as collateral damage to benefit pharmaceutical companies. The speaker briefly mentions Fauci's experiments on pyramids in Africa in the next chapter.

A couple's nightmare began when their baby, Cyrus, experienced unexplained vomiting. After missing a doctor's appointment, they were reported to Child Protective Services (CPS) and confronted by police officers. The officers threatened to take the baby away unless they complied. The mother, desperate to keep her child, agreed to let the baby go with the officers to the hospital. The parents express their fear of the foster care system, citing statistics of abuse and death. They believe that their rights as parents and human beings are being violated. They describe the devastating impact of losing their child and criticize the system as a growing global problem.