reSee.it - Related Video Feed

I am fully convinced about climate change. While we may not know the exact cause, we suspect it is related to the sun. There is a significant amount of evidence supporting this, and I would estimate that we are about 90% sure.

Speaker 0 questions Speaker 1's science background, noting their political science degree. Speaker 0 suggests Speaker 1 is pushing pseudoscience. Speaker 1 states Speaker 0 is not quoting science. Speaker 0 asks about the consensus on parts per million of CO2 in the atmosphere. Speaker 1 answers about 406, noting 350 is considered dangerous. Speaker 0 claims the average has been over 1000 parts per million since mammals walked the planet. Speaker 1 counters that CO2 levels haven't been as high as today in the last 800,000 years. Speaker 0 says CO2 levels were higher for 200,000,000 years before that. Speaker 1 says humans weren't present then, and there were geologic events. Speaker 0 asks if geology stopped when humans arrived. Speaker 1 says the conversation isn't serious, and Speaker 0 agrees, stating Speaker 1's testimony is not serious.

Over the past century, it has been discovered that the variations in the Earth's magnetic field, caused by the sun's charged particles, have a significant impact on global climate. This challenges the widely accepted belief that human-released carbon dioxide from burning fossil fuels is solely responsible for recent climate change. By analyzing magnetic and meteorological data, scientists have found clear evidence of the sun's influence on temperature variations. Additionally, recent studies have shown that the atmosphere's sensitivity to carbon dioxide is much lower than previously thought, reducing its impact on global warming. On the other hand, solar physicist Mr. Scaffeta has revised satellite data, suggesting that solar irradiance is ten times stronger than previously estimated. These findings raise doubts about the certainty and arrogance of the conclusions made by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC).

I am fully convinced about climate change. While we may not know all the causes, we suspect the sun plays a significant role. There's substantial evidence suggesting that around 90% of the influence comes from solar activity.

Speaker 0 and Speaker 1 discuss the level of CO2 in the atmosphere. Speaker 0 questions the consensus on parts per million of CO2, stating that it has been over 1,000 ppm throughout history. Speaker 1 argues that in the past 800,000 years, CO2 levels have not been as high as they are today. Speaker 0 counters by saying that geologic events have influenced CO2 levels, and questions why humans are blamed for the increase. Speaker 1 dismisses the conversation as not serious. Both speakers agree on this point.

Speaker 0 questions Speaker 1's degree, suggesting it's not a real science degree. Speaker 1 explains it's a liberal arts education. Speaker 0 asks about the consensus on CO2 levels, and Speaker 1 states it's currently at 406 parts per million. Speaker 0 argues that scientists have said 350 parts per million is dangerous. Speaker 1 counters that CO2 levels haven't been as high as today in the past 800,000 years. Speaker 0 claims that for 200 million years before that, levels were higher. Speaker 1 explains that geologic events contributed to those levels. Speaker 0 dismisses the conversation as not serious.

- Climate change is a fact. - Humans are not causing it. - The cow farts. It's not the cows. - NASA knows this. - Over 90% of the c o two, there is an increase in c o two. - Is there more c o two in the atmosphere now than there was ten years, twenty, fifty, a hundred years ago? The answer is absolutely yes. - Is it a bad thing? The answer is no. - Is it the most we've ever had? We're right about four forty parts per million right now. - The oceans are warming from underneath, not from the top. Warm water holds less gas.

The speaker discusses the impact of the sun on climate change, referring to historical periods of warmth and coldness. They explain that the sun's brightness and the Earth's orbit, influenced by other planets, are the main factors that explain climate variations. They criticize the focus on CO2 as the cause of climate change and emphasize the importance of considering seasonal variations and the sun's magnetic field. The speaker mentions their extensive research on the topic and concludes that predicting climate change is challenging due to the complexity of the sun's magnetic field.

Climate change is a fact, but humans are not causing it. NASA knows that over 90% of the CO2 is coming from the oceans. Is there more CO2 now than ten, twenty, fifty, or a hundred years ago? The answer is absolutely yes. Is it a bad thing? The answer is no. We're right about 440 parts per million right now. In geologic history, Cretaceous and Jurassic were over a thousand parts per million; Triassic, 2,000 parts per million. The earth was lush. CO2 levels and temperatures are not always one-to-one. Where's the CO2 coming from? NASA knows: the CO2 is coming from the oceans warming from underneath. Warm water holds less gas. The oceans are warming from underneath from tectonic processes every twelve thousand five hundred years, beginning in the core and causing more tectonic and volcanic activity, which is exactly what we're seeing.

Climate is always changing, with measurable changes in temperature and rainfall. The planet has been warming and cooling for 4.567 billion years, and for most of that time, it has been warmer and wetter with higher sea levels than now. Warmings and coolings are driven by the Earth's distance from the sun, which changes due to its orbit shifting from circular to elliptical, its axis changing, and its wobbling. Unless you can change the magnetic fields of the sun or the Earth's orbit, you cannot change the climate. Throughout Earth's history, there have been millions of climate changes, none of which have been identified as driven by changes in atmospheric carbon dioxide. There is no record of carbon dioxide driving climate in the past, so there is no logical reason to think that current climate change is driven by changes in carbon dioxide. The past is the key to the present.

The speaker challenges the idea of man-made global warming, stating that the science behind it is weak and uncertain. They argue that the Earth's climate has always changed throughout history, with periods of both warmer and cooler temperatures. They mention the Little Ice Age in the 14th century, when the Thames River froze over, and the Medieval Warm Period, which was associated with prosperity. They also highlight the Holocene maximum during the Bronze Age, when temperatures were significantly higher for over 3,000 years. The speaker concludes that climate variation in the past is natural.

The speaker challenges the idea of man-made global warming, stating that the science behind it is weak and uncertain. They argue that the Earth's climate has always changed throughout history, without any help from humans. They mention the Little Ice Age in the 14th century, when the Thames River froze over and ice fairs were held. They also discuss the Medieval Warm Period, a time of prosperity and vineyards in Europe. Going further back, they mention the Holocene maximum during the Bronze Age, when temperatures were significantly higher for over 3 millennia. The speaker concludes that climate variation in the past is natural.

Earth's climate changes radically over ten thousand years, shifting from extremely hot to extremely cold, as seen in ice ages. The magnetic poles have also shifted over time. While the exact cause of climate change is unknown, there's a strong suspicion, around 90% certainty, that it's the sun.

Speaker 0 says that the richest people in the world have recently started telling people they need to produce more energy, which they find “a little weird” because the same group has spent at least the past fifteen years—since Al Gore became famous—telling people the opposite. Speaker 0 claims they said energy is not the source of life or the base of civilization, but instead the cause of humanity’s downfall: the destruction of the earth and the main reason for climate change. Speaker 0 further states that CO2 is the reason it is getting warmer and that this warming happens because climate cycles are part of nature, including the example that glaciers existed and now do not. Speaker 0 says this group previously taught that burning fossil fuels was not only bad for the environment but a sin, and that society should be organized around being “carbon conscious” because they “love the earth.” Speaker 0 then claims that the same people, including Larry Fink of BlackRock, have since said they are going to take a pause on concern about global warming and that society needs more electricity. Speaker 0 states that most electricity on Earth is produced by boiling water to move turbines, and that a small portion uses radioactive material in nuclear reactors, while most generation is from coal, then natural gas, and some oil. Speaker 0 characterizes this as essentially industrial-age technology: refining and cleaning, but fundamentally the same process of burning fuel to boil water and generate power. Speaker 0 says these figures who previously framed that technology as inefficient and morally wrong are now calling for a massive expansion of it. Speaker 0 links this shift to AI, describing artificial intelligence as a dramatic, quantum increase in processing power that enables computers to reason and mimic human thinking, replacing a lot of human labor. Speaker 0 states that AI is incredibly demanding of power and will require far more electricity than most people understood. Speaker 0 concludes that society will need to put on hold—and invert—its concerns about global warming in order to build AI.

The speaker, Professor Ian Clark, is a paleoclimatologist who studies Earth's temperatures in the Arctic over hundreds of thousands of years. He explains that ice cores contain data on climate variations and CO2 levels. Surprisingly, the research shows that temperature changes precede CO2 changes by about 800 years. This suggests that temperature drives CO2 levels, not the other way around. Multiple studies confirm this pattern, contradicting the belief that CO2 is the cause of global warming. The evidence from ice core drilling disproves the fundamental hypothesis of human-induced climate change.

Earth's climate also changes pretty radically over the course of like say ten thousand years. You know, it can shift from being extremely hot to extremely cold. You can really go down a deep rabbit hole if you read about ice ages. That that that how much Earth's climate has changed and even where the where the magnetically where the poles are have has shifted over time. So on the climate change issue, I'm fully convinced. After all these years, even though we may not know exactly what is causing climate change, we suspect it's the sun. We have a lot of evidence to show that it's probably the sun. Very high percentage, you know, like, I would say, 90%, we're sure.

Speaker 0 is fully convinced about the climate change issue. They say, “even though we may not know exactly what is causing climate change, we suspect it’s the sun.” They add, “we have a lot of evidence to show that it’s probably the sun,” and state, “Very high percentage, you know, like, I would say 90%, we’re sure.”

Speaker 0 believes climate change is not a hoax, noting the last ten years have been the warmest on record. They advocate for transforming the energy system from fossil fuels to sustainable energies to create jobs. Speaker 1 says the climate change issue is complicated, stating the Earth's temperature has never been static. They reference a Washington Post piece that found the Earth is in a cooling period. They cite scientists who have captured 485 million years of climate change data. Speaker 1 suggests there's a lot of money and control involved in the climate change emergency issue.

The speaker, who identifies as a scientist and founder of The Weather Channel, disagrees with the idea of global warming being a consensus. They argue that science is not about voting but about facts, and claim that there is no significant man-made global warming happening now or in the future. They believe that climate change has become a political issue rather than a scientific one. The other speaker questions the speaker's views and mentions the 97% consensus among climate scientists. The speaker responds by suggesting that the government funds research that supports the global warming hypothesis, leading to biased results. The conversation ends with the acknowledgement that they won't reach a conclusion.

Speaker 0: The first ice core survey at Vostok in the Antarctic found a clear correlation between carbon dioxide and temperature. Speaker 1: Going back six hundred fifty thousand years, the temperature history shows that the relationship is complex, but there is one relationship far more powerful: when there is more carbon dioxide, the temperature gets warmer. Al Gore says the relationship between temperature and CO2 is complicated, but there was something important in the ice core data he failed to mention. Professor Ian Clark notes that the link between CO2 and temperature exists, but the link is the wrong way round. Speaker 2: When examining ice cores, climate on long scales is recorded in geological material. Ice samples use isotopes to reconstruct temperature; the atmosphere imprisoned in ice is liberated to analyze CO2 content. Speaker 0: Professor Clark and others have discovered a link between CO2 and temperature, but the link is reversed. Speaker 2: In the Vostok ice core, as temperature rises from early to later times during a deglaciation, CO2 follows with an eight-hundred-year lag, meaning temperature leads CO2 by about eight hundred years. Speaker 0: Major ice core surveys consistently show that temperature rises or falls, and then after a few hundred years, CO2 follows. Speaker 3: Therefore, carbon dioxide is not the cause of warming; warming produced the increase in CO2. Speaker 2: CO2 clearly cannot be causing temperature changes; it is a product of temperature changes. Speaker 4: The ice core record challenges the fundamental assumption of the theory that CO2 increases in the atmosphere cause warming, showing that the assumption is wrong. Speaker 0: How can higher temperatures lead to more CO2 in the atmosphere? Carbon dioxide is a natural gas produced by all living things. Speaker 5: Carbon dioxide is not a pollutant; living things grow with CO2. Humans produce only a small fraction of atmospheric CO2, in the single digits percentage wise. Speaker 0: Volcanoes produce more CO2 each year than all human sources combined. Animals and bacteria produce about 150 gigatons of CO2 per year, compared with 6.5 gigatons from humans. Dying vegetation, such as falling leaves, is another large source. The biggest source is the oceans. Speaker 6: The ocean is the major reservoir into which CO2 goes when it comes from the atmosphere, or from which it is re-emitted. Heating the surface makes the ocean emit CO2; cooling allows the ocean to dissolve more CO2. Speaker 0: The warmer the oceans, the more CO2 they produce; the cooler they are, the more they absorb. There is a time lag of hundreds of years between temperature change and CO2 change due to the ocean’s huge size and depth, giving the oceans a memory of temperature changes. Speaker 6: The ocean’s memory can extend up to ten thousand years. A current North Atlantic change may reflect events in distant parts of the ocean decades or centuries earlier. Speaker 0: The modern warming began long before widespread use of cars or electric lights. In the past 150 years, temperature rose just over half a degree Celsius, but most of that rise occurred before 1940. Since then, temperature has fallen for four decades and risen for three. There is no evidence from Earth’s long climate history that CO2 has ever determined global temperatures.

On climate change, the speaker says they are fully convinced. They acknowledge we may not know exactly what is causing climate change but suspect it is the sun. They claim there is a lot of evidence showing it’s probably the sun, and that about 90% are sure.

We are currently in an interglacial period within an ongoing ice age that started 34 million years ago. The climate fluctuates between cold glaciation and warm interglacial periods, driven by the sun's heat. The distance from the sun determines the temperature, not trace gases. No legislation can alter the Earth's orbit, which will eventually lead us into another cool period. These climate cycles occur every few hundred million, hundred thousand, and few thousand years, influenced by factors such as continental movements, cosmic rays, orbital changes, solar activity, tides, and oceanic patterns. The combination of these cycles can bring about rapid climate changes.

Earth's climate changes radically over ten thousand years, shifting from extremely hot to extremely cold. The Earth's magnetic poles have also shifted over time. While the exact cause of climate change is unknown, there is suspicion and evidence suggesting the sun is the primary factor. There is a high degree of certainty, around 90%, that the sun is the cause.

Earth's climate undergoes significant changes over thousands of years, shifting from extreme heat to extreme cold, as seen in ice ages. Additionally, the magnetic poles have also shifted over time. Regarding climate change, there is a strong belief that the sun plays a major role in these changes. While the exact causes of climate change are still being studied, there is substantial evidence suggesting that solar activity is responsible for a large percentage of it, with a high level of confidence in this conclusion.

Speaker 0 questions Speaker 1 about the consensus on CO2 levels in the atmosphere. Speaker 1 states that it is currently at 406 parts per million, while scientists consider 350 parts per million dangerous. Speaker 0 argues that CO2 levels have been higher in the past, even before humans existed. Speaker 1 counters that the past 800,000 years have not seen CO2 levels as high as they are today. Speaker 0 dismisses the conversation as not serious, and Speaker 1 agrees.