reSee.it - Related Video Feed

Megyn Kelly discusses the recent $50 million judgment against Alex Jones, stemming from a defamation lawsuit filed by Neil Heslin and Scarlett Lewis, parents of Sandy Hook victim Jesse Lewis. The jury awarded $4.1 million in compensatory damages and $45.2 million in punitive damages, although the latter may be reduced due to Texas's punitive damages cap. Jones had previously been found liable for defamation after failing to comply with court orders during the discovery phase. The lawsuit arose from Jones's repeated claims that the Sandy Hook shooting was a hoax, labeling the parents as crisis actors. This led to harassment and threats against the families, prompting several lawsuits against Jones. Kelly recounts her experience covering the Sandy Hook tragedy and her interview with Jones, which drew significant backlash. She defends her journalistic decision to interview him, noting that many media outlets had done so without similar criticism. Kelly highlights the emotional impact of the Sandy Hook shooting on the families and the broader societal questions surrounding gun access. She emphasizes that while free speech is important, it does not protect false statements that harm others. The judgment against Jones is seen as a necessary step in holding him accountable for his actions. In the latter part of the show, Kelly interviews newly elected Texas Congresswoman Mayra Flores, who discusses her conservative values and the challenges she faces as a Latina Republican. Flores criticizes the reactions of northern city mayors to Texas's migrant bus policies, calling them hypocritical. She also addresses the racist attacks she has faced during her campaign and expresses her commitment to advocating for legal immigration and family values. The conversation shifts to Florida Surgeon General Dr. Joseph Ladapo, who discusses his new book "Transcend Fear" and shares insights on public health, including the handling of COVID-19 and the importance of addressing trauma. Ladapo emphasizes the need for a balanced approach to health policies and the risks associated with current vaccine mandates for children.

Megyn Kelly returns to her show after a break, eager to discuss major news, particularly regarding Donald Trump and a recent $450 million judgment against him in a civil case led by New York Attorney General Letitia James. Michael Knowles joins to discuss the case, noting that Trump has successfully appealed to reduce the bond amount from $450 million to $175 million, which is seen as a relative win for Trump. Knowles argues that the legal system is being weaponized against Trump, reflecting a historical pattern where political opponents face severe consequences. The conversation shifts to the upcoming criminal trial related to Stormy Daniels, where Trump is accused of campaign finance violations. Knowles expresses skepticism about the prosecution's case, suggesting that the charges are trivial compared to the broader political context. The discussion also touches on the media's portrayal of Trump and the double standards in how accusations are treated based on political affiliations. Later, Dan Wootton discusses Princess Katherine's recent announcement about her cancer diagnosis, emphasizing the unusual nature of a royal family member addressing health issues publicly. Wootton speculates on the royal family's handling of the situation, suggesting that they may have downplayed the severity of Katherine's condition initially. He also highlights the online conspiracy theories surrounding her health and the scrutiny from the public. The conversation then moves to Meghan Markle's new lifestyle brand, which Wootton criticizes as inauthentic and opportunistic, especially given the timing of its launch amidst Katherine's health news. He also discusses the dismissal of Samantha Markle's lawsuit against Meghan, which claimed defamation, and the implications of their strained family relationship. Finally, Wootton expresses outrage over the Victoria and Albert Museum's decision to label Margaret Thatcher alongside historical villains, arguing that it reflects a broader trend of leftist narratives undermining significant political figures. The discussion concludes with a critique of media bias against conservative figures and the challenges of free speech in contemporary discourse.

Megyn Kelly opens the show by reflecting on her recent experiences, including celebrating her one-year anniversary on SiriusXM and attending a Pearl Jam concert at the Apollo Theater. She shares a story about enthusiastic fans who finally received their long-awaited tickets after a two-year delay due to the pandemic, emphasizing the joy of live music. Transitioning to current events, Kelly discusses the ongoing legal troubles surrounding Donald Trump and his associates, highlighting Steve Bannon's claims that numerous Trump allies have been targeted by the FBI. Bannon alleges that the FBI's actions relate to election denials and "fake electors," raising concerns about First Amendment rights. Kelly expresses skepticism about the credibility of the leaks regarding Trump’s legal issues, suggesting they often serve to create negative publicity rather than reflect actual legal jeopardy. Investigative reporter Sharyl Attkisson joins the conversation, discussing the media's portrayal of Trump and the speculation surrounding his recent appearance in Washington, D.C. Attkisson argues that many leaks about Trump have proven false in the past, indicating a pattern of misinformation. She also critiques the moral authority of prosecutors pursuing Trump, citing past misconduct within the FBI and the justice system. The discussion shifts to the Biden administration's handling of the border crisis, with Attkisson sharing her observations from recent visits to the border. She describes the overwhelming influx of migrants and the challenges faced by border towns, countering claims from Vice President Kamala Harris that the border is secure. Attkisson highlights the dire conditions faced by migrants and the ineffectiveness of current policies. Kelly and Attkisson then address the recent controversy involving a Duke volleyball player who accused BYU fans of racial slurs during a match. After an investigation found no evidence to support the claims, the discussion turns to the broader implications of victimhood narratives in society. They explore how claims of victimhood can sometimes overshadow the truth and lead to unjust consequences for those accused. Vivek Ramaswamy, author of *Nation of Victims*, joins the show to discuss his book, which critiques the culture of victimhood in America. He argues that victimhood has become a new national identity, detracting from the pursuit of excellence. Ramaswamy emphasizes the need for a shift towards a shared national identity based on merit and hard work, rather than victim narratives. The conversation touches on the implications of DEI (diversity, equity, and inclusion) initiatives in education and corporate America, with Ramaswamy warning that these practices could undermine meritocracy and lead to a decline in competitiveness against countries like China. He predicts that the rise of China may serve as a wake-up call for America to revive its commitment to excellence and merit-based systems. In closing, Kelly previews upcoming guests on her show, including Malcolm Gladwell and Russell Brand, and encourages listeners to subscribe for more insightful discussions.

Megyn Kelly opens the show discussing a defamation case involving a doctor, Dr. Mahendra Amin, who settled with NBC News after being falsely accused of performing unnecessary hysterectomies on detainees at an ICE facility. The allegations originated from a nurse, Don Wooten, who claimed Dr. Amin was a "uterus collector." MSNBC aired these claims without sufficient verification, leading to a lawsuit from Dr. Amin, who argued that the network failed to investigate the truth of the allegations despite internal doubts. Kelly highlights the hypocrisy of Leticia James, the New York Attorney General, who is facing allegations of mortgage fraud while prosecuting Donald Trump for similar financial misrepresentations. Angaran, a guest on the show, points out the Democrats' double standards and how they have compromised their values in their pursuit of Trump. They discuss the implications of James' alleged actions, suggesting that her past criticisms of Trump may come back to haunt her. The conversation shifts to the case of Abrego Garcia, an illegal immigrant accused of gang affiliations and domestic violence. Kelly criticizes Democratic senators who advocate for Garcia, framing him as a poster boy for their immigration policies. Angaran discusses the broader implications of open border policies, emphasizing the negative impact on American citizens and the exploitation of vulnerable immigrants. Kelly and Angaran also address the backlash against the Blue Origin space mission, where a group of women celebrated their brief trip to space. They mock the self-congratulatory tone of the participants and the media coverage, contrasting it with the serious contributions of actual astronauts. The discussion highlights the disconnect between the elite's perception of their achievements and the reality faced by everyday Americans. The segment concludes with a focus on the defamation case against NBC News, where Dr. Amin's attorney, Stacy Evans, explains the reckless reporting that led to the lawsuit. She details the internal doubts expressed by NBC staff regarding the credibility of Wooten's claims and the lack of evidence supporting the allegations. The settlement allows Dr. Amin to move forward, emphasizing the importance of truth in journalism and the consequences of sensationalized reporting.

Megyn Kelly opens the show discussing her family's early Thanksgiving celebration, humorously referring to it as "fakesgiving." She transitions to political topics, noting that President-elect Donald Trump's cabinet is complete and highlighting the media's acknowledgment of its ideological diversity. A CBS News poll shows significant public support for Trump, which she anticipates will upset the media. Joining her are guests Stu Berge and Steven L. Miller, who engage in light banter about Thanksgiving foods, particularly stuffing and cranberry sauce. They then shift to a critique of the media, particularly Joe Scarborough's defense of journalism against social media criticism. Scarborough argues that being a reporter requires hard work and integrity, which Kelly and her guests challenge, citing instances where mainstream media failed to hold power accountable. The conversation turns to the media's handling of Trump and the upcoming confirmation process for his cabinet picks. They discuss the implications of the media's bias and how it affects public perception, particularly regarding the credibility of accusations against political figures. Kelly emphasizes that the media's past failures, especially during the Kavanaugh hearings, have led to skepticism about current allegations against figures like Pete Hegseth, who faces scrutiny over personal conduct. They analyze the political landscape, including Kamala Harris's potential ambitions and the public's mixed feelings about her. The discussion also touches on the media's portrayal of police actions during the January 6 Capitol riot, particularly the shooting of Ashley Babbitt, and how it contrasts with their treatment of other police shootings. As the show progresses, they critique the selection of cabinet members, particularly Dr. Janet Woodcock for Surgeon General, expressing concern over her past positions on COVID-19 measures. They conclude by emphasizing the importance of accountability in journalism and the need for a more balanced approach to reporting on political figures and their actions. The episode wraps up with a promise to delve deeper into Trump's cabinet in future discussions.

Megyn Kelly opens the show discussing the media's reaction to President-elect Donald Trump’s upcoming inauguration, highlighting various emotional responses from figures like Don Lemon and Jeff Bezos. The conversation shifts to breaking news about mysterious drone sightings reported by Maryland Governor Larry Hogan, who expressed public concern over the lack of transparency from federal authorities regarding these incidents. Despite government assurances that the drones do not pose a threat, lawmakers are demanding briefings to clarify the situation. Hugh Hewitt joins the discussion, expressing skepticism about the federal government's dismissive stance on the drone sightings. He mentions that experts, including Shy Sankar from Palantir, find the situation alarming, emphasizing the need for better control over airspace. The conversation touches on the possibility of foreign adversaries exploiting gaps in U.S. security. The dialogue then transitions to Pete Hegseth, whose West Point admission is questioned by ProPublica. Hegseth's acceptance letter is presented as evidence against claims that he lied about his admission. Hewitt criticizes ProPublica for their rushed reporting and lack of journalistic integrity, suggesting that the scrutiny Hegseth faces is politically motivated. Kelly and Hewitt also discuss the media's treatment of Trump and the frustrations of reporters covering his transition team, noting the differences in access compared to previous elections. They highlight the challenges faced by journalists trying to report on Trump’s administration. The conversation shifts to Dr. Aseem Malhotra, who discusses his documentary, "First Do No Harm," which critiques the pharmaceutical industry's influence on healthcare, particularly regarding statins and cholesterol. Malhotra argues that high LDL cholesterol is not a significant risk factor for heart disease and emphasizes the importance of addressing insulin resistance and lifestyle changes for heart health. He shares patient success stories and stresses the need for independent evaluation of drug trials. Malhotra also addresses the psychological barriers preventing acknowledgment of vaccine-related health issues, particularly concerning mRNA vaccines. He highlights the need for improved metabolic health and lifestyle changes to mitigate potential vaccine side effects. The discussion concludes with a call for transparency and accountability in the pharmaceutical industry and healthcare practices.

ABC News has settled a defamation lawsuit with Donald Trump for $15 million, a rare occurrence involving public officials due to the high bar for proving defamation. The settlement followed a statement by George Stephanopoulos regarding the E. Jean Carroll case. The decision raises questions about the potential contents of Stephanopoulos's emails and the implications for press freedom, with reactions from commentators expressing concern over the precedent set by this capitulation.

Dave Rubin expresses gratitude to his audience and shares personal news about his surrogate giving birth. He discusses Donald Trump's lawsuit against CNN for defamation, claiming the network has falsely labeled him and misrepresented the 2020 election. Trump seeks $475 million, arguing that CNN's actions are politically motivated. Rubin reflects on the challenges of defamation lawsuits and the broader implications for free speech. He also addresses various community questions, touching on his views about Disney, the Biden administration, and the state of journalism. Rubin emphasizes the importance of individual actions in societal change and shares his admiration for influential figures in his life. He concludes with a light-hearted mention of his desire to visit Japan.

Megyn Kelly discusses the backlash against Elon Musk following his acquisition of Twitter, highlighting a perceived coordinated effort from the media, celebrities, and the White House to undermine free speech. She introduces guests from the Ruthless podcast, who share insights on the current state of CNN, which is undergoing significant layoffs under new leadership due to low morale and ratings. They attribute CNN's decline to its partisan shift during the Trump administration, criticizing its failure to provide balanced coverage and the echo chamber it created. The conversation shifts to Musk's commitment to free speech on Twitter, contrasting it with the media's reaction to his policies, which they argue are aimed at suppressing conservative voices. They express concern over the media's calls for government intervention in social media, emphasizing the importance of protecting free speech rights. Kelly and her guests also analyze the implications of recent layoffs at CNN, attributing them to a loss of credibility and audience trust. They discuss the challenges Republicans face in upcoming elections, citing a brand problem exacerbated by Trump's influence and the need for candidates to connect with voters on pressing issues like the economy and abortion. The discussion concludes with reflections on the broader media landscape, the importance of diverse viewpoints, and the need for accountability in journalism. Kelly teases future segments, including a deep dive into the Casey Anthony story.

Megyn Kelly opens the show discussing the media coverage of Pete Hegseth and the rape allegations against him, criticizing outlets like CBS for sensationalizing the story without reporting the full context of the police report. She highlights key details from the report, including that the alleged victim, referred to as Jane Doe, was seen flirting with Hegseth before the incident and appeared sober to eyewitnesses. Kelly expresses outrage at the media's failure to report exonerating facts and emphasizes the importance of journalistic integrity. Victor Davis Hanson joins the discussion, agreeing with Kelly's assessment of the situation. He points out inconsistencies in the alleged victim's account, noting that the timeline and eyewitness testimonies do not support her claims of being drugged or assaulted. Hanson argues that the media's portrayal of Hegseth as a rapist is unjust and reflects a broader trend of unfair treatment towards conservative figures. The conversation shifts to the implications of Hegseth's nomination for a defense secretary position and the potential impact of the allegations on his confirmation. Kelly and Hanson discuss the political motivations behind the allegations, suggesting that they may be an attempt to undermine Hegseth's candidacy due to his controversial views on military and defense issues. Kelly then transitions to the topic of media ratings, revealing that shows like MSNBC's "Morning Joe" are experiencing significant declines in viewership. She attributes this to a growing discontent among audiences with the mainstream media's bias and failure to report facts accurately. The hosts of the Red Scare podcast, Anna Catan and Dasha Nekrasova, join Kelly in the studio. They discuss their political evolution from leftist views to supporting Trump, attributing their shift to the left's increasing radicalism and the mainstream media's failure to address issues that matter to everyday Americans. They highlight the backlash against woke culture, particularly regarding gender identity issues, and how it resonates with a broader audience. The conversation touches on the cultural implications of the left's ideology, with Catan and Nekrasova criticizing the way institutions have been ideologically captured. They argue that the focus on identity politics has eroded trust in these institutions and that many people are beginning to push back against this trend. Kelly and her guests also discuss the portrayal of women in media and politics, particularly in relation to figures like Melania Trump and the double standards applied to women in the public eye. They emphasize the importance of recognizing the complexities of women's experiences and the need for a more nuanced discussion around issues of gender and identity. As the show wraps up, Kelly expresses hope for a shift in the political landscape, suggesting that the younger generation of conservative leaders may bring about positive change. The episode concludes with a call for honesty in reporting and a recognition of the need for accountability in media narratives.

Megyn Kelly opens a wide-ranging episode that centers on high-profile legal and political stories sweeping through media and public life. The show delves into Cash Patel’s defamation lawsuit against The Atlantic, presenting the journalist’s deep-dive piece as a focal point for a broader discussion about public figures, media scrutiny, and the standards of reporting when a political operative’s career is at stake. The hosts analyze the potential implications of the article’s portrayal—whether it relies on factual assertions, rhetorical framing, or alleged habits—and consider the strategic motives behind a public figure suing a major outlet. The conversation then shifts to a sensational criminal case involving David (D4VD), who faces murder charges with additional counts tied to alleged sexual abuse materials. The panelists discuss how prosecutors frame the evidence, the possible paths to indictment, and the role of grand jury procedures in complex homicide investigations, highlighting how recent procedural choices can influence trial strategy and public perception. In parallel coverage, the show examines the Katy Perry allegations in Australia, where a historical claim of sexual assault has resurfaced amid renewed attention and legal scrutiny. The discussion weighs credibility, potential corroborating witnesses, and the challenges of pursuing cases with long-ago timelines, noting how cross-jurisdictional dynamics complicate accountability and the media narrative. Interwoven with these legal dramas is a snapshot of American politics, with Megyn Kelly summarizing polling data from AP and Fox News, interpreting shifts in independent voters, economic sentiment, and the dynamics of California’s political race. Hosts compare poll trends, discuss the broader question of how economic conditions influence midterm outcomes, and reflect on the role of state-level debates in shaping national discourse. Throughout, the episode foregrounds critical media literacy themes, inviting listeners to scrutinize sources, assess bias, and consider how media framing can affect public trust in institutions, while keeping the focus squarely on questions of law, governance, and public accountability rather than promotional content.

Megyn Kelly hosts a special edition of her show focused on the Trump hush money trial, humorously likening the courtroom drama to a romance novel. She critiques the media's sensationalized coverage of Trump's behavior during jury selection, highlighting exaggerated descriptions of his actions, such as appearing bored or whispering to his lawyer. Kelly emphasizes that such mundane observations are typical in jury selection but are treated as noteworthy due to Trump's celebrity status. Legal experts Vinnie Politan and Jonna Spilbor join Kelly to discuss the jury selection process, noting the surprisingly quick seating of jurors despite Trump's divisive reputation. They analyze the profiles of selected jurors, expressing skepticism about their potential biases and the implications for Trump's defense. The conversation touches on the challenges of finding impartial jurors in a high-profile case and the strategies attorneys might employ to navigate this. The discussion shifts to the implications of Trump's statements regarding payments made to Michael Cohen, which could be perceived as admissions of guilt. The hosts speculate on how these statements might affect the trial's outcome. In a separate segment, they preview the upcoming Karen Reed murder trial, detailing the conflicting narratives surrounding the case. Reed is accused of intentionally running over her boyfriend, while the defense claims a police cover-up. The hosts highlight the complexities of the evidence, including a Google search related to the case and the potential influence of local law enforcement. Overall, the episode captures the intersection of media sensationalism, legal strategy, and the challenges of jury selection in high-stakes trials.

Megyn Kelly discusses the recent jury verdict ordering former President Trump to pay E. Jean Carroll $83.3 million in damages for defamation related to her sexual assault allegations. The trial focused solely on the damages after a jury found Trump liable for sexual assault. Kelly criticizes the media's soft treatment of Carroll during her media tour and highlights the lack of tough questions regarding the credibility of her claims. Glenn Greenwald joins the discussion, expressing concerns about the judicial system being weaponized against political figures like Trump, and the challenges of defending oneself against decades-old allegations without evidence. Greenwald points out the political motivations behind the case, suggesting that the judicial system is being used to punish those with opposing ideologies. He notes the difficulties Trump faced in defending himself due to the nature of the allegations and the absence of evidence supporting his defense. The conversation shifts to the media's bias, particularly in how they treat allegations against Trump compared to those against other political figures, such as Joe Biden. Kelly and Greenwald also discuss the implications of the case for free speech and the role of alternative media in providing a platform for diverse viewpoints. They emphasize the importance of independent media in countering mainstream narratives and the need for accountability in journalism. The discussion touches on the rise of platforms like Rumble, which aim to promote free speech without censorship. Later, Kelly interviews Chris Pavlovski, CEO of Rumble, who explains the platform's growth and commitment to free expression. He highlights Rumble's success in attracting users who seek alternatives to mainstream platforms that suppress certain viewpoints. Pavlovski discusses the challenges faced by creators on platforms like YouTube and the importance of allowing open discourse on controversial topics. The conversation concludes with Omid Malik, an entrepreneur and investor, discussing the need for a parallel economy that supports businesses aligned with conservative values. Malik emphasizes the importance of consumer choice in supporting companies that uphold free speech and resist political correctness. He advocates for the creation of alternatives to major corporations that engage in censorship and promote ideologies contrary to those of many Americans.

Megyn Kelly discusses a recent event on Capitol Hill involving Dr. Kevin O'Connor, President Biden's physician, who invoked doctor-patient privilege and the Fifth Amendment during a closed-door hearing with James Comer’s committee. Halperin notes that O'Connor's refusal to answer questions raises concerns about accountability, especially regarding Biden's health during his presidency. He emphasizes that this situation is not just about privacy but about ensuring the public is informed about the president's fitness for duty. Halperin expresses skepticism about O'Connor's claims of a pending DOJ investigation, suggesting it may be a tactic to avoid scrutiny. He argues that if O'Connor has nothing to hide, he should not be worried about legal repercussions. The discussion highlights the importance of transparency regarding the president's health, especially given Biden's age and reported health issues. The conversation shifts to the media's role in covering these health concerns, with Halperin criticizing the press for not adequately investigating Biden's cognitive and physical health. He contrasts this with how the media would react if a Republican president faced similar scrutiny. The hosts also discuss the implications of O'Connor's actions on public trust and the need for accountability in the medical care provided to the president. They touch on the broader implications of the Epstein case, with Trump expressing frustration over ongoing questions about Epstein's connections to powerful individuals. Halperin argues that the administration's lack of transparency on this issue could lead to a loss of trust among the public and within the MAGA base. The discussion concludes with a humorous segment about media vanity, focusing on David Muir's appearance and the lengths some anchors go to maintain their image on camera. Kelly and Halperin critique the obsession with physical appearance in news reporting, contrasting it with the more grounded approaches of other anchors. They emphasize the importance of focusing on the news rather than personal vanity, especially in serious reporting situations.

Megyn Kelly opens the show discussing the recent settlement between Fox News and Dominion Voting Systems, expressing relief that the trial won't proceed, which she believes is a positive outcome for both parties. She also mentions the fallout from a fabricated rape story at Stanford University, where a student falsely accused a man, leading to protests on campus. The conversation shifts to the political landscape, focusing on the rivalry between Donald Trump and Ron DeSantis. Kelly highlights DeSantis' strong stance on transgender issues, emphasizing his refusal to accept the notion that a man can be considered a woman. This is contrasted with previous comments from Trump and his son, Donald Trump Jr., showcasing a divide in their approaches to cultural issues. Jeffrey Lord and Michael Duncan join Kelly to discuss the implications of the ongoing culture wars, particularly regarding transgender rights and corporate responses to social movements, such as the Bud Light boycott. They analyze how both Trump and DeSantis are navigating these contentious topics, with DeSantis positioning himself as a cultural warrior. The discussion also touches on the upcoming presidential candidates, including Tim Scott and Nikki Haley, and the dynamics of their campaigns. Kelly notes the increasing tensions and personal attacks between Trump and DeSantis, including a humorous ad from Trump about DeSantis eating pudding with his fingers. As the conversation progresses, they delve into the implications of the Fox-Dominion settlement, discussing the media's reaction and the broader context of journalistic integrity. They highlight the hypocrisy in media criticism of Fox, given their own history of misreporting. The show then transitions to a legal case involving Daniel Perry, who was convicted of murder after shooting a man during a BLM protest. Governor Greg Abbott's push for a pardon is discussed, along with the complexities of self-defense laws in Texas. The panel debates the implications of Perry's texts, which reveal troubling attitudes towards protesters. Finally, Kelly introduces a lawsuit from sorority sisters at the University of Wyoming against Kappa Kappa Gamma for inducting a transgender member, raising questions about gender identity and women's rights. The panel expresses outrage over the alleged inappropriate behavior of the transgender member and the pressures faced by the sorority sisters. They conclude by emphasizing the need for women to reclaim their rights and speak out against the current cultural shifts.

Megyn Kelly opens the show discussing her struggles with Christmas shopping for her children and invites listeners to share gift ideas. She then transitions to a significant legal development involving Donald Trump and ABC News, where Trump sued the network for defamation over statements made by George Stephanopoulos. The case settled quickly for $15 million after a judge ordered Stephanopoulos to testify, which he resisted. Kelly criticizes Stephanopoulos for repeatedly claiming Trump was found liable for rape, despite the jury's actual verdict being for sexual abuse, not rape. She expresses a desire to see the deposition transcript, highlighting the media's failure to accurately report facts. Emily Jashinsky and Eliana Johnson join Kelly to discuss the implications of the settlement, noting that it reflects poorly on ABC and raises questions about the media's accountability. They emphasize that the case's settlement indicates a fear of what might emerge during discovery, particularly regarding Stephanopoulos's communications. The conversation shifts to the broader media landscape, with Jashinsky pointing out that the settlement has sparked outrage among media peers, who accuse ABC of enabling Trump. The discussion then moves to CNN's Clarissa Ward, who reported on a Syrian prisoner rescue that raised suspicions of being staged. Jashinsky and Johnson analyze whether CNN was duped or complicit in the narrative, emphasizing the importance of verifying sources and facts in journalism. They criticize the network for failing to check the identity of the individual involved, who was allegedly a torturer rather than a victim. Kelly concludes by addressing the recent sightings of drones across several states, questioning the government's transparency regarding their purpose. Jashinsky and Johnson express skepticism about the government's claims of ignorance, suggesting that the public deserves clarity on the situation. They highlight the potential for public anger if the government is withholding information, reinforcing the need for accountability in media and government reporting.

Megyn Kelly opens the show discussing E. Jean Carroll's media appearances following her $83 million defamation judgment against Donald Trump. She criticizes Carroll's claims of reputational harm, suggesting that her status has actually risen since the allegations. Kelly highlights a clip of Carroll joking about using Trump's money for personal luxuries rather than women's rights, which she finds distasteful. Glenn Beck joins the discussion, questioning Carroll's credibility and the jury's decision, arguing that the case against Trump is weak and politically motivated. The conversation shifts to the media's portrayal of the verdict, with Kelly and Beck criticizing outlets like MSNBC and The View for celebrating Carroll's win as a victory for women's rights while ignoring the complexities of the situation. They argue that the legal changes enabling Carroll's lawsuit were politically driven and that the media narrative is misleading. Kelly and Beck also touch on the broader political landscape, expressing concerns about the potential for a Michelle Obama candidacy in the next election, suggesting that the Democratic Party may be grooming her as a strong candidate against Trump. They discuss the implications of ongoing legal challenges against Trump and the perception of him as a political martyr. The discussion then moves to current events, including the rise of conspiracy theories surrounding Taylor Swift and the NFL, with Kelly dismissing claims of a coordinated effort to influence the election through celebrity endorsements. Beck emphasizes the need for accountability in government and media, expressing skepticism about the current administration's handling of national security and immigration. The segment concludes with a focus on the transgender debate in sports, particularly Leah Thomas's legal challenges to compete in women's swimming. Kelly and her guests express frustration over the ongoing acceptance of transgender athletes in women's sports, advocating for the protection of women's rights and fair competition. They also highlight the backlash against companies like Rip Curl for replacing female ambassadors with transgender individuals, calling for accountability and support for women in these discussions.

Megyn Kelly opens the show discussing President Donald Trump's busy week, highlighting his signing of executive orders, including one to declassify documents related to the assassinations of JFK, RFK, and MLK Jr. She expresses disbelief that these documents have remained secret for so long. Later, she introduces Zachary Young, a military veteran who successfully sued CNN for defamation, winning $5 million in compensatory damages. Piers Morgan joins the discussion, sharing his transition to independent media through his YouTube channel, emphasizing the shift from traditional media to digital platforms. He notes that younger audiences prefer consuming news on platforms like YouTube, which allows for more flexibility and authenticity compared to conventional television. Morgan argues that the average age of cable news viewers is rising, indicating a shift in media consumption habits. The conversation shifts to the media's handling of defamation cases, particularly regarding CNN. Morgan reflects on the recent defamation case against CNN, where Young was wrongfully portrayed as exploiting desperate Afghans during the evacuation crisis. Young clarifies that he was not operating in a black market and was providing valuable services to corporations needing assistance in Afghanistan. He describes the emotional toll the CNN report had on his life, leading to severe personal and professional consequences. Young's attorney, Val Freedman, explains the legal complexities of the case, noting that Young was not deemed a public figure, which made it easier to prove negligence against CNN. The jury found that CNN acted with malice, leading to the substantial compensatory award. Freedman highlights the rarity of such a verdict against a major media organization, indicating a potential shift in accountability for media outlets. Young discusses the impact of the defamatory report on his reputation and mental health, revealing that he struggled with anxiety and depression as a result. He emphasizes the importance of holding media accountable for their reporting, particularly when it affects individuals' lives. The discussion also touches on the broader implications of media accountability and the need for transparency in journalism. Young expresses hope that his case will encourage other victims of media defamation to seek justice and that it will prompt media organizations to reflect on their practices. As the segment concludes, Kelly and Morgan reflect on the changing landscape of media, the importance of factual reporting, and the responsibility of journalists to uphold integrity in their work. They emphasize the need for a more honest and responsible approach to news reporting, particularly in an era where misinformation can have serious consequences.

Megyn Kelly opens the show discussing a recent mass shooting at a mall in Allen, Texas, committed by a 33-year-old army veteran with a history of mental health issues. The shooter killed eight people and wounded several others. Investigations are underway into his potential Neo-Nazi sympathies based on social media posts. Kelly expresses frustration over the recurring nature of mass shootings in America and argues that gun control measures have not proven effective. She emphasizes the need to focus on mental health services and fortifying soft targets like schools and malls rather than solely debating gun control. Kelly transitions to discussing the ongoing situation with Tucker Carlson and Fox News. Reports suggest Carlson is preparing to challenge Fox News as he seeks to exit his contract, which runs until January 2025. He has been approached by other media outlets and is contemplating starting his own platform. Carlson's allies are reportedly ready to attack Fox News for its handling of his situation, as ratings for the network have plummeted since his departure. Kelly notes that Carlson has not been officially fired but is being kept silent by Fox, which she believes is unfair. The conversation shifts to the Trump defamation trial involving E. Jean Carroll, who alleges Trump raped her in the 1990s. Kelly highlights the challenges Trump faces in defending himself against these claims, noting the lack of concrete evidence and the one-sided nature of the trial. She discusses the implications of the Access Hollywood tape and how it may affect the jury's perception of Trump. Finally, Kelly and her guests discuss the recent coronation of King Charles III, focusing on Prince Harry's brief appearance and the ongoing tensions within the royal family. They touch on the media's portrayal of the royal family and the accusations of racism directed at them, particularly in light of Meghan Markle's previous criticisms. The discussion concludes with a critique of the current cultural climate surrounding issues of race and gender, emphasizing the need for open dialogue and the importance of women's voices in these discussions.

Megyn Kelly opens the show discussing her enjoyable weekend, including attending a Broadway show with her family. She introduces guests Michael Knowles, Arthur Aidala, and Mark Eiglarsh for a segment on legal matters, including Amber Heard's recent appeal in the Johnny Depp defamation case. Kelly highlights the release of the "Twitter Files" by Elon Musk, shared with journalist Matt Taibbi, revealing internal discussions at Twitter regarding the suppression of the Hunter Biden laptop story. The files indicate that requests from the Biden campaign to delete tweets were routine, and that Twitter's decision to suppress the story was made at high levels without CEO Jack Dorsey's knowledge. Knowles emphasizes that the real scandal is the gaslighting of the public by powerful institutions, and that the suppression of the story had significant implications for the 2020 election. The conversation shifts to Trump’s reaction to the Twitter Files, with Knowles noting that Trump’s rhetoric often goes too far, but he has valid points about the election's integrity. They discuss the media's role in the suppression of the story, with Kelly criticizing major outlets for their initial dismissal of the laptop's legitimacy. The discussion then moves to Amber Heard's appeal, where she argues that the exclusion of her therapy notes and the trial's venue in Virginia were unfair. The guests analyze the implications of her claims, noting that the jury found her less credible, which could hinder her appeal. They also discuss the complexities of defamation law, particularly regarding opinions versus facts, and how Heard's statements may have been interpreted as factual rather than opinion-based. In a lighter segment, Kelly addresses the scandal involving GMA anchors Amy Robach and TJ Holmes, who were taken off the air amid revelations of their affair. The discussion touches on the implications of morals clauses in broadcasting contracts and the potential consequences for the anchors. Lastly, they briefly mention Balenciaga's recent controversies involving inappropriate imagery in their advertising campaigns and the subsequent lawsuit they dropped against a set designer, highlighting the brand's accountability in the matter. The show concludes with Kelly thanking her guests and encouraging viewers to engage with the content online.

Megyn Kelly discusses the ongoing Fox News Dominion trial in Delaware, emphasizing the significant First Amendment and journalistic principles at stake. Dominion claims Fox defamed them by promoting false election fraud narratives. Kelly expresses concern that if Dominion loses, it could set a precedent making it harder for public figures to win defamation cases due to the high actual malice standard established in New York Times v. Sullivan. She believes Dominion has a chance but acknowledges the challenges they face, including a lack of direct evidence of malice from Fox anchors. The trial is expected to last six weeks, and Kelly notes the potential influence of Fox personalities on the jury. She critiques the mainstream media's portrayal of the case, suggesting that many are overly eager for Fox's downfall without considering the broader implications for press freedom. The discussion shifts to the recent violence in Chicago, highlighting a disturbing incident where a woman was attacked by a mob. Kelly criticizes the city's leadership for failing to address rising crime and gang violence, expressing disappointment in the mayor-elect's response, which she views as insufficient. The conversation then turns to the shooting of Ralph Yarl, a 16-year-old who mistakenly rang the wrong doorbell. The shooter, an 84-year-old man, has been charged, and the case has garnered significant media attention, particularly due to the racial dynamics involved. Kelly points out the disparity in media coverage compared to other violent incidents, emphasizing the need for consistent reporting on race and crime. Finally, Kelly addresses Leah Thomas, a transgender athlete advocating for the inclusion of trans kids in sports. She argues that allowing trans women to compete against biological women undermines fairness in athletics. The discussion reflects broader societal tensions around gender identity and sports, with Kelly asserting that biological differences between men and women should be acknowledged in competitive contexts.

Megyn Kelly opens the show discussing the recent settlement between ABC News and Donald Trump, where ABC reportedly paid $15 million over a defamation lawsuit related to George Stephanopoulos's misleading statements. Kelly critiques the network's response, noting that Stephanopoulos's so-called apology lacked sincerity. She also highlights new reporting on President Biden's declining health and the ongoing narrative from his team that he is performing well behind the scenes. Adam Carolla joins the discussion, expressing skepticism about ABC's reputation and their handling of major stories over the past several years, particularly regarding Trump and COVID-19. He argues that the network's credibility has been damaged due to their inaccuracies and biases. Carolla emphasizes that true defiance would involve Stephanopoulos resigning rather than issuing a forced apology. The conversation shifts to the implications of the lawsuit, with concerns that it could set a precedent affecting free speech and defamation standards. Kelly and Carolla discuss the media's failure to maintain neutrality, particularly in their coverage of Trump and other political figures, and how this has led to a loss of trust among the public. They also touch on the cultural shifts in Broadway productions, noting how recent performances have embraced progressive themes, which some audience members find off-putting. Carolla critiques the lack of accountability in media and politics, suggesting that the public is increasingly aware of the biases in reporting. The discussion concludes with reflections on the current political climate, the role of social media in shaping public perception, and the importance of maintaining integrity in journalism. Kelly and Carolla express a desire for a return to more balanced reporting and a recognition of the complexities surrounding contemporary issues.