reSee.it - Related Video Feed

The speaker argues that to understand how the American government actually works at the highest levels, you must know that Richard Nixon was historically the most popular president, elected with a massive margin in 1972, yet he was forced to resign and was replaced by Gerald Ford, an unelected president. The speaker asserts this demonstrates that the federal agencies undermine the American system, a point Nixon allegedly warned about and was right about. Key events and connections highlighted include: - Nixon’s meeting with CIA director Richard Helms on June 23, 1972, during which Nixon allegedly implied knowledge of who killed John F. Kennedy and suggested CIA involvement in Kennedy’s assassination; Helms reportedly remained silent. - Four days earlier, the Washington Post published the first Watergate break-in story; the speaker notes that four of the five burglars worked for the CIA and that Bob Woodward, the reporter, had a background in the classified realm and worked with intelligence agencies; Woodward’s main source was Mark Felt, deputy director of the FBI, who allegedly ran COINTELPRO to discredit Nixon and other political targets. - The FBI’s COINTELPRO program is cited as a mechanism used to take down Nixon’s vice president, Spiro Agnew, who was indicted for tax evasion in 1973 and forced to resign; Ford, a Warren Commission member, replaced Agnew, with the claim that Ford’s qualifications were tied to his involvement with the Commission’s conclusion that the CIA bore no responsibility for Kennedy’s assassination. - The speaker alleges that Nixon was strong-armed into accepting Gerald Ford as president by Democrats in Congress, with the claim that Ford’s rise demonstrated a systemic pattern in which the presidency could be controlled by federal agencies and political elites rather than by elected representatives or voters. The narrative then shifts to the Trump era, stating that Michael Flynn—an Army intelligence veteran who had led the Defense Intelligence Agency—was targeted by the FBI shortly after Trump’s inauguration, lured into a meeting without legal counsel, and pressured to resign based on fabricated crimes; this is presented as evidence of how the system operates against national-security-minded figures who seek to push back. The speaker contrasts this with Joe Biden, claiming he was similarly harmed by the justice system and portraying Biden as deserving neither sympathy nor special treatment, while contending that the broader electorate deserves a genuine democracy in which people who are not elected to lead do not run everything. The overarching claim is that “democracy becomes a joke” when unelected actors wield real power.

He had "a military mind" but around 2009, "Obama came in" and he was "beside himself that he had to say, yes, sir, to this guy," so he started "working immediately against him." He "built up this whole network of people" as the "Muslim threat was not being taken care of." "You know, he was black. He was this." After Obama left office, he "decided to use that network for his own self." "A lot of people in intelligence and the military" decided to work against them, and "they would code stuff and send it out." "That was a military takeover and eventual handover to foreign interests" and "He is very much a one world government, one world religion guy." They tried to promote Trump: "January 6 vice president, remove Trump, and then he'd be president," but "that didn't work. Huge backlash. So they stopped." "We know what your intentions are, and everybody's on to them now." "It's coming out."

I work at a top consulting firm embedded in the Pentagon, focusing on artificial intelligence and emerging technologies. I previously served as an FBI special agent in counterintelligence, motivated by my desire to catch foreign spies after the 2016 election. I have meetings with retired generals to discuss national security concerns regarding Trump's presidency, whom I view as a sociopathic narcissist primarily interested in his own gain. Tomorrow, I have a significant meeting with military leaders in a secure location to discuss AI and the need for better information sharing. I believe Trump may attempt to extend his presidency beyond the constitutional limit, which raises concerns about the future.

They accuse us of what they're doing. These intelligence officials, the same ones who misled America, are worried about a second Trump term? They helped bury the Hunter Biden laptop story before the 2020 election. That laptop could have changed history. Now they claim Trump will weaponize the spy services. If Trump wins, I want them investigated for election interference. Joe Biden should be the first target. We need to expose them to the same rules they impose on us. They stole the election, and we can't just move on. They hid the laptop information. The deep state is real—media members, intelligence community members, both active and retired, and government bureaucrats. The deep state sabotaged the Trump administration before, and they're still here.

The discussion centers on a former FBI agent embedded at the Pentagon, who reveals plans to counteract Trump’s influence. He describes a significant meeting in a secure area called "the tank," where military leaders discuss strategies against Trump. The agent expresses concerns about Trump's potential actions and shares insights on overclassification in intelligence, which hampers effective communication. He also discusses his previous efforts to thwart Trump’s presidency alongside retired generals. The conversation highlights ongoing tensions within the government and the implications of Trump's return to power, emphasizing the need for whistleblowers to expose corruption. The agent's candid remarks about Trump and his connections to military leadership raise alarms about potential coup-like activities.

The transcript follows a chaotic exchange among multiple speakers discussing information sources, political narratives, and protests, with several recurring themes and claims. - There is a pattern of questioning information sources and personal actions. Speakers repeatedly ask, “Who the fuck is Jeremy? Where do I get my information? Why did I delete karaoke?” and “Who the fuck is Jonathan? Where does he get his information? Why did he delete karaoke?” indicating a concern with source credibility and content deletion. - A speaker (Speaker 2) describes a sense of purpose from sharing information, claiming that Wisconsin was the first state where “the evidence that I and my one of my associates, Chris, had put together for Peter, Wisconsin was the first state where it was actually presented, you know, under oath in, you know, a senate… Wisconsin Senate Committee on Election Integrity.” -Jeremy Oliver (Speaker 3) promotes alternative information channels, stating he has a YouTube page, a personal Facebook page, and that viewers can see “at the last protesting.” He frames mainstream media as unreliable, promising to “stream live and show exactly what's going on at the protest and really just support the people that are out there fighting for our First Amendment rights.” - Several participants discuss plans to act on protest grounds, including references to “Using other state capitals for practice dry runs” (Speaker 4) and “we’re basically ready to storm the capital with us in a couple of minutes” (Speaker 5). - There are assertions that “we’re all actors, but I wanna direct and act” (Speaker 6) and depictions of confrontations with others during protest or media interactions, including exchanges where people demand to speak with others about Mary Fenix/Fanning (Speaker 5). - A series of critical assertions target then-President Donald Trump and link various individuals and organizations to a network. A speaker states: “Donald Trump has no business being president,” followed by further claims about a coalition “super think tank of Biden, Harris, a couple intellectual figure behind them… Mike Flynn… and two economists,” including Simon Johnson, described as IMF chief economist, with English birth. - The conversation introduces the America Project and Patrick Byrne, claiming Flynn registered Flynn Intel Group from Stanley McChrystal’s home and associating McChrystal with the Defeat Disinfo Pack, an AI system that detects opposing viewpoints for Trump, and then shares those viewpoints to counter them. The system is said to target the Patriot movement. - There is a claim that the Flynn network included Ali Alexander and Michael Flynn, and that their aim was “to create instability as they're trying to carry out a color revolution,” listing criteria such as “a united and organized opposition,” “an ability quickly to drive home the point that voting results are falsified,” “compliant independent media,” and “capable of mobilizing tens of thousands or more demonstrators.” - A discussion on 2020 voting numbers is presented as a comparison to the midterms. It is stated that “2020, they reported 395,000 in-person voters on election day,” with debate about whether that figure was statewide or in Maricopa County. Projections speculate on how many Republicans intended to vote but did not cast ballots, with estimates ranging from around 150,000 to 700,000. - Additional claims connect groups and individuals to broader political finance and media ecosystems, including mentions of the US Agency for Global Media, prior Hillary Clinton and John Kerry involvement, and references to propaganda concerns. - Toward the end, the discussion touches upon Wisconsin politics again, with commentary on a state supreme court candidate and voter ID emphasis as a Democrat-leaning position contrary to expectations, followed by a shift into a more personal debate about a case involving a mother’s tragedy and media attention, ending with a tangential accusation of sympathy manipulation.

Meet shadow president Peter Thiel. Recognized as Republican kingmaker, Thiel has wielded extraordinary influence over Donald Trump's administration. Thiel dominated his original transition team, has won multiple military contracts under Trump for 30 different government agencies, has been the primary force behind JD Vance's political rise to power. Neil is also recognized as the dawn of the PayPal mafia. He sits on the steering committee of the Bilderberg Group and co founded the now infamous big tech company Palantir, which he currently chairs. Named after the all seeing stone in Lord of the Rings, Palantir was seated with CIA money and is used by the FBI, NSA, ICE, local law enforcement, and Israeli and Ukrainian militaries. From AI precrime software in America to generating kill list in Israel, Palantir is one step closer to the dystopian concept of Skynet. It's time to look beyond the political theater. It's time to wake up.

Jamie Mannarino, a consultant embedded in the Pentagon who works with the Joint Staff, is a former FBI special agent and "spy hunter." He assesses Trump as a sociopathic narcissist and is in talks with retired generals about potential actions. Mannarino anticipates a meeting with military leaders in a secure room called the Tank to discuss artificial intelligence and emerging technologies like quantum computing, which he says doesn't exist yet but will change everything. Mannarino met Hillary Clinton in college and worked for her at the State Department. He became an FBI agent after she lost in 2016, aiming to catch Russian and Chinese spies. He criticizes Secretary of Defense Peg Seth for alleged infidelity, sexual assault allegations, and alcoholism. Mannarino claims Trump is only interested in advancing his name, wealth, and fame, and questions his loyalty. He predicts Trump will entertain staying in office beyond his term to avoid jail. Mannarino also admits to working with retired generals and ambassadors to highlight the national security consequences of another Trump presidency, including ghostwriting op-eds for them.

I'm embedded in the Pentagon, working in the joint staff, and I have experience as a former FBI agent. We discuss trafficking and I describe the perpetrator as a sociopathic narcissist. There are concerns about protecting the American people from potential threats he may pose. I'm currently in discussions with retired generals to explore strategies for addressing these issues.

Jamie Mannarino, who met Hillary Clinton while pursuing his master's at George Washington University, followed her to the State Department and later became an FBI special agent focused on counterintelligence. After her 2016 loss, he transitioned to a consulting role at the Pentagon, working with senior officials on artificial intelligence and emerging technologies. During a covert meeting, he revealed plans for a significant discussion with military leaders about overcoming bureaucratic obstacles and enhancing international cooperation. Mannarino expressed concerns about Donald Trump's presidency, describing him as a "sociopathic narcissist" and shared his efforts with retired generals to counter Trump's influence. He also predicted Trump might attempt to extend his term beyond four years, highlighting the potential for political maneuvering to avoid legal consequences.

I work at a top consulting firm embedded in the Pentagon, focusing on artificial intelligence and emerging technologies. I previously served as an FBI special agent in counterintelligence. My assessment of Trump is that he is a sociopathic narcissist primarily interested in his own wealth and reputation. I'm in discussions with retired generals about how to protect American interests. I have a significant meeting with military leaders tomorrow to address AI and the need for better information sharing. I also worked with a nonprofit to highlight the national security risks of another Trump presidency, writing numerous op-eds. I believe Trump may entertain the idea of extending his term, which would create considerable political pressure.

James O'Keefe reports from the Pentagon about a branch chief, Nicholas Terza, who is allegedly resisting Trump and Hegseth. Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth has stated that there are people within the Pentagon who want to resist the president and hurt his policies. Terza expressed dissatisfaction with Hegseth, claiming he is too young for the job. Terza claims he knows Hegseth from the DC National Guard, but a senior Pentagon official denies this. Terza said that Trump is an illegitimate president and an immoral dictator, and that he plans to resist everything Trump does. He believes Trump lacks moral conviction and is stupid. O'Keefe questions whether the president's safety should be entrusted to people who believe he is illegitimate and immoral.

An individual, Amjad Fassisi, claims to have worked for the CIA since 2008, also having worked at the NSA, and possessing a TSSCI with a full score polygraph. Fassisi states the CIA kept information from President Trump because "he's an idiot," and information would leak if shared with certain people. Fassisi claims that higher-ups within the intel community, including CIA directors Mike Pompeo and Gina Haspel, colluded to withhold information from Trump. According to Fassisi, the executive staff, including the director and subordinates, were involved. Fassisi states Trump is under constant surveillance and they are spying on his ex-wife. He indicates they used human intelligence to determine Trump was colluding with the Russians and that the intel community used Pfizer to spy on Trump and his team. Fassisi suggests multiple agencies, including the CIA and NSA, were involved in spying on Trump.

The speaker, who works in the executive office of the White House, manages two federal agencies and is responsible for protecting their networks. They discuss the importance of keeping secrets and serving as the president's voice in meetings. They mention concerns about Joe Biden's mental fitness and the unpopularity of Kamala Harris, but acknowledge that they cannot publicly address these issues. The speaker also talks about their background in cybersecurity and their role in overseeing responses to cyber incidents. They mention the ego within the State Department and their own experiences in the field. The conversation touches on various topics, including vaccines and Michelle Obama's decision not to run for office. The speaker is unaware that they are speaking with James O'Keefe, the founder of Project Veritas, and discuss a cybersecurity operation at the White House. The video ends with a teaser for future revelations.

I work at a top consulting firm embedded in the Pentagon, focusing on artificial intelligence and emerging technologies. I have meetings with military leaders about these topics, emphasizing the need for better information sharing and collaboration. I also express concerns about Trump, describing him as a sociopathic narcissist primarily interested in his own gain. I’ve been working with retired generals to address potential threats from his presidency. My past experience includes being an FBI special agent focused on counterintelligence, particularly against Russian and Chinese spies. I was involved in efforts to defeat Trump during the election, writing extensively under various names. I predict he may attempt to extend his term, despite constitutional limits.

I caught a Pentagon advisor to the Joint Chiefs of Staff, specializing in AI, coordinating a secret war room to counter Trump. This guy, Jamie Mannarino, worked for Hillary Clinton, then the FBI as a "spy hunter," and now advises on AI technologies that "don't yet exist." Mannarino was caught on hidden camera discussing these secret meetings and expressing his negative opinions about Trump. He even mentioned consulting with retired generals about what actions they could take to prevent certain potential presidential actions. Following this exposure, the Pentagon spokesperson stated they were not involved and that Mannarino was out of control and had been stopped. This is an example of the deep state attempting a coup.

I work at a top consulting firm embedded in the Pentagon, focusing on artificial intelligence and emerging technologies. I previously served as an FBI special agent specializing in counterintelligence. My assessment of Trump is that he is a sociopathic narcissist primarily interested in his own wealth and reputation. I’m in discussions with retired generals about how to protect American interests. I have a significant meeting tomorrow with high-ranking military leaders to address AI and the need for better information sharing. I’ve also been involved in efforts to highlight the national security risks of another Trump presidency, writing extensively under various names. I believe Trump may attempt to extend his presidency beyond the constitutional limit, which could lead to significant political turmoil.

I work at a top consulting firm embedded in the Pentagon, focusing on artificial intelligence and emerging technologies. I previously served as an FBI special agent, specializing in counterintelligence. I have concerns about Trump, viewing him as a sociopathic narcissist primarily interested in his own gain. Tomorrow, I have a significant meeting with military leaders to discuss AI and the need for better information sharing. I've been collaborating with retired generals to address national security concerns related to Trump's presidency. We aimed to inform the public about the implications of another Trump term, and I contributed extensively to op-eds and articles. I predict Trump may publicly consider extending his term, which would create significant political tension.

James O'Keefe reports from the Pentagon about a branch chief, Nicholas Terza, who is allegedly resisting Trump and Hegseth. Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth has claimed some Pentagon employees are undermining the president. Terza expressed dissatisfaction with Hegseth, saying he's too young for the job. Terza claims to know Hegseth from the DC National Guard, but a Pentagon official denies this. Terza stated that Trump is an illegitimate president and immoral dictator, and that he plans to resist everything Trump does. He believes Trump supporters want to enact a populist conservative framework, even if it means being sexist, racist, or chauvinist. Terza says Trump lacks moral conviction and can be stupid. O'Keefe questions whether the president's safety should be entrusted to those who believe he is illegitimate and immoral.

“Even his name is fake.” He didn’t go by Vance until he was 30; Vance was the name of his meemaw, and he changed his name to Vance before publishing a book he’d long been working on about his meemaw. For thirty years he was JD Hamill and went by other names. He talks about his book at the Aspen Institute and at investment bank retreats. “He’s the deplorable Trump whisperer,” and “a complete artifice that was created by neocons and defense contractors.” “Peter Thiel’s net worth comes from an intelligence contractor called Palantir,” founded with In-Q-Tel; its first client for seven years was the CIA. The speaker says Vance is fabricated, backed by Silicon Valley liberals and intelligence interests, pushed as a dissident right winger. “Vance for president 2028”—born a week after Trump’s inauguration in 2017; “not organic to get $15,000,000 to run for senate from a CIA contractor.”

I work at a top consulting firm embedded in the Pentagon, focusing on artificial intelligence and emerging technologies. I previously served as an FBI special agent in counterintelligence. My assessment of Trump is that he's a sociopathic narcissist primarily interested in his own wealth and reputation. I'm in discussions with retired generals about protecting American interests, especially regarding AI. I recently had a significant meeting with military leaders to address these issues. I also expressed concerns about incoming Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth, citing his personal issues. Additionally, I worked with a nonprofit to highlight the national security risks of another Trump presidency, which I found disheartening after his election victory. I predict Trump may attempt to extend his term, despite constitutional limitations.

Cole notes that he purchased six galvanized pipes of this size on June 1, June 8, and November 16, and asks for receipts. The discussion shifts to what questions a point person in 2021 would face and to a theory of the case, with speculation about how individuals could be drawn into a plan to influence events, including the possibility of a “pipe bomb” plot and manipulation of associates. Speaker 1 explains that, as a federal investigator, one would use a speculative investigative lens to broaden the search to cover various permutations of the case, including the idea that there was a so-called Red Mirage Blue Shift scenario surrounding the 2020 election. They reference CNN’s 2020 reporting on deciphering red mirage and blue shift uncertainty, including pre censorship by DHS/CISA in June 2020 to suppress any social media criticism of mass mail-in ballots, so as to prevent questions about legitimacy of an upcoming Biden victory. The discussion asserts that the goal was to preempt perceptions of illegitimacy and manage the narrative around the election results. The conversation then turns to Rosa Brooks, a high-ranking Obama administration official who headed the Transition Integrity Project (TIP) and wrote about pathways to remove Trump from power. Speaker 1 cites Brooks’ article “Three ways to stop President Trump before the 2020 election” and notes an assertion, reportedly in a Diet of Lisa-like coverage, that she later discussed a fourth, insurrectionary possibility: a military coup. They claim TIP was a war game conducted in June 2020 and then in November 2020, involving senior military, intelligence, diplomatic, and political operatives, with participants from both parties including Michael Steele (former RNC head), Donna Brazile (former DNC head), John Podesta (Hillary Clinton’s campaign manager), Bill Kristol, and others. The summary asserts that TIP’s appendix, “Will Trumpism survive a Trump loss?” warned that Trumpism could persist even after a loss, necessitating a robust strategy to eliminate Trump supporters and networks that enabled Trump’s rise. It is claimed the document discusses how to mobilize mass street protests, especially via Black Lives Matter and allied groups, to pressure a Biden administration to act against Trump, including funding and resource provisioning of protest movements to ensure their alignment with Democratic objectives. The dialogue alleges that, in June 2020, TIP proposed measures to de- legitimize Trump, including not letting Trump use the National Guard or invoke the Insurrection Act to quell protests. It is asserted that the plan contemplated mass demonstrations, the use of “street protests” as decisive leverage, and the establishment of communications infrastructure to support mass mobilization for street action if Trump won, or to counter him if he did not. The participants allegedly favored aligning with groups like Soros-funded Indivisible and Hold the Line, and urged resourcing new racial justice leaders and major philanthropic/foundation channels to fund these movements, including a claimed $50 billion in funding to Black Lives Matter. The transcript claims that TIP’s War Game included explicit scenarios about alternate electors, secession moves, and the potential for mass prosecutions of Trump and his associates, as well as strategic recommendations on how to proceed if Trump refused to concede. It is further asserted that a June 2020 war game considered provoking an “January 6” breakdown in Congress as a central move to prevent a contested inauguration, with participants pondering agent provocateurs and avenues to postpone certification. Throughout, the speakers connect the pipe-bomb purchases in June 2020 to the TIP war games and the broader plan to undermine Trump through street mobilization, legal maneuvers, and potential mass arrests of Trump supporters and networks, while noting the January 6 events as a focal point of these discussions.

I work at a top consulting firm embedded in the Pentagon, focusing on artificial intelligence and emerging technologies. I previously served as an FBI special agent, specializing in counterintelligence. My assessment of Trump is that he is a sociopathic narcissist primarily interested in his own gain. I'm in discussions with retired generals about protecting American interests, especially regarding AI. Tomorrow, I have a significant meeting with military leaders to address these issues. We need to improve information sharing and collaboration among international partners. I also worked with a nonprofit to highlight the national security risks of another Trump presidency, which I found disheartening after his election victory. I predict Trump may attempt to stay in office beyond his term, despite constitutional limitations.

A CIA contractor named Amjed Fassisi, who has worked at the CIA since 2008 and also at the NSA, claims that high-ranking officials within the intelligence community, including former CIA directors Mike Pompeo and Gina Haspel, colluded to withhold information from President Trump, believing him to be an "idiot" who would disclose sensitive information. Fassisi states that Trump is under constant surveillance, including his ex-wife, and that the intelligence community used human intelligence to investigate Trump's alleged collusion with Russia. He also claims that Israel, a U.S. ally, steals intelligence. Fassisi believes Trump will not be re-elected, preferring democracy over a "fucking madman." He acknowledges the CIA and NSA don't trust each other and don't share information. When confronted with these statements, Fassisi denies making them.

I work at a top consulting firm embedded in the Pentagon, focusing on artificial intelligence and emerging technologies. I’ve been in discussions with retired generals about protecting American interests, especially regarding the potential threats posed by Trump, whom I view as a sociopathic narcissist. Tomorrow, I have a significant meeting with military leaders in a secure room called "the tank" to discuss these critical issues. I’ve also been involved in efforts to explain the national security risks of another Trump presidency, contributing to numerous op-eds under the names of retired officials. I predict Trump may attempt to extend his term, despite constitutional limits, which could create significant political tension.