reSee.it - Related Video Feed

- Speaker 0 expresses a core problem: how to support the Donald Trump presidency when the figures associated with his circle (Alex Jones, Owen Shroyer, Ian Carroll) embody traits they oppose, prompting questions about alignment with their side. He asks how to reconcile supporting Trump with these associations, calling it an objective problem. - Speaker 1 responds that he has not researched certain controversial items (Eric Prince’s phone) and notes that Eric Prince is a polarizing figure from the military-industrial complex world. He argues that involvement in war fighting does not automatically make someone evil and that a full picture requires digging beyond initial impressions, acknowledging he hasn’t done all the research. - Speaker 0 challenges this, citing his own video: Eric Prince has three CEOs for Blackwater, all with intricate ties to the IDF. He questions coincidence between Palantir Technologies and the surveillance state, Israel’s influence, and three IDF-affiliated Blackwater CEOs, referencing USS Liberty and suggesting Eric Prince’s past atrocities and a lack of accountability. He asks whether such a figure could ever be considered a good person and whether repentance is possible, noting he hasn’t seen Prince acknowledge past wrongs. - Speaker 0 adds BlackRock as another easy target, claiming BlackRock, with help from the Trump administration, bought two ports in the Panama Canal for $22.8 billion, and contends Trump mentioned a company would buy the Panama Canal during the State of the Union, but did not name BlackRock. He challenges the listener to consider whether Trump is on their side given this nugget of information. - Speaker 1 says he was not endorsing a specific device or action, calling the “phones” comment offhand and irrelevant. He reiterates he isn’t waiting for Trump or Elon Musk to act in the interest of people, and states he’s intentionally not waiting for them to do so. He emphasizes starting change bottom-up, and encourages starting conversations rather than trolling, suggesting Seven Seas could help. - Speaker 0 shifts to a broader miscommunication problem: there’s a gap where people misread each other, treating allies as enemies. He advocates filling this gap through dialogue with diverse figures like Seven Seas, Ian Carroll, Joe Rogan, Whitney Webb, Derek Brose. He mentions a planned March sit-down interview between Derek Brose and Ian Carroll, hoping for a productive exchange, while noting past heated exchanges where ad hominem attacks diminished constructive dialogue. He cites Clint Russell and redheaded libertarian as examples of contentious interactions. - They discuss disagreements over Trump’s ideology and policies, including concerns that Trump still praises the VA, pharma, and large-scale spending, which confounds libertarian critiques. He cites a national debt comparison between Obama and Trump era spending, arguing that debt devalues the dollar and harms Americans, regardless of party. - Speaker 0 reiterates suspicion that the criticism of Trump and Elon Musk coexists with perceived support for them, labeling it an inconsistency. He promises to withhold calling someone a shill until there is clear intent to deceive. Speaker 1 suggests focusing on good-faith arguments, mentioning Glenn Greenwald with respect, and invites Seven Seas to share their take on Ian Carroll’s reaction to Seven Seas’ post.

Speaker 0 claims his life is awesome, while Speaker 1 is going to work. Speaker 0 mocks Speaker 1 for going to community college and working with his hands. Speaker 1 accuses Speaker 0 of shitting on blue-collar workers while trying to appeal to them. Speaker 0 clarifies he is trying to appeal to rich people and identifies as an elitist, "kind of" like Richard Spencer. Speaker 1 says Speaker 0 has never worked with his hands and lives a terrible life. Speaker 0 says he likes being poor and that it's manly. Speaker 1 says he's not poor, it's just cheaper to live the way he does. Speaker 1 asserts that every functional member of society works, except Speaker 0. Speaker 1 says he'd rather be a functional member of society than be unique. Speaker 0 says Speaker 1 wants to be a cog.

Speaker 0 demands answers and truth, claiming that people cannot handle it. Speaker 1 questions the purpose of pretending and inventing. Speaker 0 asserts that everyone's history is a fabrication and illusion. They mention living in a world with guarded walls, questioning who will protect them. The transcript abruptly ends.

The speaker emphasizes the importance of independent research and critical thinking. They warn against blindly accepting information and urge listeners to question everything, including their own beliefs. The speaker believes that we live in an age of deception, where people are easily manipulated and influenced by agendas they don't fully understand. They encourage listeners to seek the truth, even if it is elusive and not always black and white. The speaker also discusses the concept of brainwashing and how closed-mindedness is a sign of being brainwashed. They express concern about the state of the country and the need for people to actively participate in order to preserve freedom. The speaker mentions the founding fathers and their vision for a free society, but also acknowledges that they were members of secret societies. They explain that the constitution was designed to give power to the people, but also had elements that could lead to downfall if the people proved unworthy of self-rule. The speaker concludes by urging listeners to learn the truth, educate others, and break free from the deception of the current age.

Speaker 0 urges the importance of studying and discovering the origins of things, emphasizing the need to understand where things come from. Speaker 1 asks what happens when people do uncover those origins, and what becomes of individuals whose entire life has been defined by the Bible. Speaker 0 responds by asking listeners to consider the situation in Russia. He asks: In Russia today, what is it like when you find out that you’ve been hoodwinked, that your government was not the most powerful and most wonderful government on earth, and now it has totally collapsed? He inquires what people would do in such a moment, highlighting that they trusted, raised their children, and wasted their entire life by going along to get along. He explains that when a government collapses, the consequence is a destabilized world for those who did not do their homework and did not stand up for what was right when they could have. The implication is that choosing conformity over principle leads to losses when circumstances change. The speaker asserts that people went along because it was comfortable at the time, but now the situation is very uncomfortable. Speaker 0 then connects this to a broader purpose, stating the need for a shared reflection: a spiritual revolution in the country in which people say, simply, “just say no.” He extends this call to reject organized religion, organized government, tyranny, and all forms of bigotry, ignorance, and ill-informed stupidity, regardless of where they originate or what color they may be. The core message is a universal imperative to resist oppression and dogma. Finally, the speaker reiterates the central action requested: “Just say no to organized religion. Just say no to organized government. Just say no to tyranny,” followed by the insistence that this stance applies to all forms of tyranny and prejudice. He concludes with a reiteration of the essential point: the need to do your homework. In sum, the transcript centers on the dangers of blind trust and conformity, the collapse of established power as a warning, and a call for a broad, nonconformist, principled resistance to oppressive structures—whether religious, governmental, or ideological—through informed, independent scrutiny and action. The emphasis is on recognizing uncomfortable facts, questioning established narratives, and taking a stand when possible.

Speaker 0 urges people to study and discover where things came from. Speaker 1 asks what happens when that discovery occurs, especially for those whose entire life has been built around the Bible. Speaker 0 replies by proposing a real-world example: in Russia today, what is it like when you find out that you’ve been hoodwinked, that your government was not the most powerful and most wonderful government on earth, and now it has totally collapsed? And then asks what you will do, since you trusted, raised your children, and went along to get along. You may have wasted your entire life, and now your world is collapsing around you. The cause, Speaker 0 asserts, is that you didn’t do your homework and you didn’t stand up for what was right when you could have. The consequence of going along to get along is a very uncomfortable present. Speaker 0 further clarifies the broader case: the notion that nothing on earth is permanent, and the discomfort that comes with facing uncomfortable facts. He expresses a desire for a spiritual revolution in this country in which people will simply say no—no to organized religion, no to organized government, no to tyranny, and no to forms of bigotry, ignorance, and ill-informed stupidity, regardless of color or place. The core message is that people should resist coercive structures and rigid dogmas. The overarching point emphasized by Speaker 0 is that, above all, people must do their homework. He ties the argument to the need for critical examination and personal responsibility in evaluating beliefs, authorities, and systems, using the Russian example to illustrate the potential personal and societal costs of remaining complacent or ignorant.

Speaker 0: I don't have it because I don't want it. Speaker 1: I don't trust you. I need proof of vaccination to exist. Some of us resist the lies and pseudoscience on TV. The government abuses power, confuses and scares people. I may be wrong, but I won't complain. I'm a singer who uses my brain and middle finger. I won't take anything. Vaccine passports won't affect me. Hell no, I won't get it. Hell no, I don't trust the government. Hell no, I won't comply.

Speaker 0 asks Speaker 1 if they got the vaccination and if they are okay. Speaker 1 confirms they got vaccinated and that it worked. Speaker 0 then mentions trusted sources and compares it to finding out about the moon landing or aliens. Speaker 1 responds by saying that Speaker 0's statement is idiotic and lacks rational thought. Speaker 1 concludes by saying that nobody in the room gained anything from listening to it.

Speaker 0 discusses the conflict between the stability of his current work with Mark Lutchman and his spiritual calling represented by "Donnie," which he sees as a platform to share a message deeper than politics. Speaker 1 raises concerns about conflicting messages on Speaker 0's accounts, citing examples such as praising the U.S. while also claiming it was founded by occult Freemasons and that Satan is the prince of America. Speaker 1 questions Speaker 0's true beliefs, accusing him of hypocrisy and profiting from stirring up conflicting ideologies. Speaker 1 asks if Speaker 0 will delete the "Donnie" account, as he can't fight for opposing sides simultaneously. Speaker 0 admits to being hypocritical and takes full responsibility. He mentions discussions about the path forward, including his family's insistence that he step away from "Donnie" to focus on providing for them. He has been searching for other jobs, despite the pay cut. He is at a crossroads, considering handing "Donnie" off to someone else.

Speaker 0 asks how people can trust Speaker 1 and if he is part of the cabal. Speaker 1 responds by saying not to trust him, but to trust themselves. He dismisses the idea of controlled opposition and encourages people to do their own research and make their own decisions. He criticizes those who are indecisive and urges them to take action and make a difference. Speaker 1 talks about his sacrifices and the hardships he faces, emphasizing that he doesn't care about votes but wants to save the country. He calls out politicians and accuses them of being part of controlled opposition. He concludes by telling people to stop asking him questions and to take responsibility for their own actions.

Speaker 0 asks Speaker 1 about their populist strategy, which involves appealing to people's emotions and using strong ideological language. Speaker 1 denies talking about left or right and questions who would say they are like Donald Trump. Speaker 0 mentions that many Canadians might think so, but doesn't provide specific names. Speaker 1 asks for evidence and the conversation becomes unclear. Speaker 0 then asks why Canadians should trust Speaker 1 with their vote. Speaker 1 responds by promising to bring common sense to the country, criticizing the current government's handling of the economy, and pledging to cap spending, cut waste, balance the budget, and reduce inflation and interest rates. They claim to have the only common sense plan to improve people's buying power.

The speakers exchange pointed claims about vaccination status and social policy. Speaker 0 asserts that vaccinated people are the problem and that it is the unvaccinated who are responsible. Speaker 1 counters with a stance that the unvaccinated should be shamed and blamed, and asserts that it is time to start blaming the unvaccinated, not ordinary people. The dialogue emphasizes distrust of the unvaccinated, with Speaker 0 and Speaker 1 associating the unvaccinated with negative behavior and calling for punitive approaches. Speaker 1 argues that the unvaccinated include children and people acting like children, and contends that it’s time to stop tolerating “the idiots in this country” and to mandate vaccination. The speakers discuss shaming the unvaccinated and refuse to call them stupid or silly by implication, while also stating that those who are not vaccinated will “end up paying the price” and that the unvaccinated should be taxed or pay more for health care. Speaker 0 suggests treating the choice to remain unvaccinated like driving while intoxicated, implying it should be addressed with similar seriousness. Speaker 1 claims that only the unvaccinated are dying and condemns misinformation, urging shaming and shunning of those who spread it, calling for turning people away. The dialogue advocates exclusion for the unvaccinated: Speaker 0 says unvaccinated individuals should be denied entry to offices or places of business, and Speaker 1 argues that if you don’t get vaccinated, you can’t come to work. The phrase “Ew. Screw your freedom” expresses a rejection of individual freedom in this context. Speaker 1 contends that the unvaccinated have put everyone in a bad position and asserts that it is not a good place. The conversation ends with a provocative statement about freedom and power, declaring that “Freedom is a fragile thing, and it's never more than one generation away from extinction.” The closing lines add, “Ice of man come not from the generosity of the state, but from the hand of God. They were wrong. Question everything.”

People question trust, controlled opposition, and Freemasonry. The speaker urges self-research, criticizes lazy attitudes, and emphasizes personal responsibility. They highlight sacrifices made for the country, financial struggles, and the importance of action over words. Another individual shares traumatic experiences of witnessing child abuse and vows to expose the truth despite potential risks. The conversation delves into the need for coherent storytelling to gain credibility and the eventual release of evidence. Despite warnings, the speaker remains resolute in their mission to reveal the truth.

The speaker questions the sincerity of governments claiming to have the people's interest at heart, stating that throughout history, political elites have never genuinely cared about the well-being of regular people. They advise not to trust any government blindly and always question their motives. The speaker expresses their refusal to be vaccinated with an untested drug, emphasizing the lack of scientific evidence regarding its benefits and long-term side effects. They assert that no one can grant them freedom, as they are already a free person. They challenge the European Commission and the German government, stating that they will not be coerced into getting vaccinated.

The speaker argues that the current reality is deeply deceptive and that nothing outside will improve. They claim that “none of what is going on outside, none of this gets better,” and that “everything in our world is fake.” They list several domains as fake: “Our food is fake. Our news is fake. Our politicians are fake. Our history is fake. Even our financial system is fake.” They also assert that “the people on our TV screens, on our phone screens are lying to us because everything is a scripted movie.” They acknowledge that following the prevailing narratives and the “garbage” spoon-fed to the public is a personal prerogative, stating, “if you want to believe the absolute garbage that is being spoon fed to us, then that is 100% your prerogative.” The speaker continues by describing a shift they have observed over the past five years in this “very odd new world” and “very new and odd reality” that everyone now inhabits. They urge that by now, the majority should realize there is something “much more sinister and something much more spiritual going on behind the scenes.” They convey a sense of personal mistrust, saying, “I literally do not believe a single thing that I see anymore. I do not believe anything that I see anymore because after the last five years, a little bit more.” They explain that there are “narratives being pushed” and “distractions being pushed,” and that people are watching a movie so that “the people in control can move the chess pieces.”

The speakers discuss powerful individuals who want to keep Speaker 0 out. Speaker 0 believes they should want him because he is a great candidate, but Speaker 1 suggests it's about control and being on their team. Speaker 0 refuses to make a deal with these people and sees it as a battle worth fighting. Speaker 1 mentions the importance of raising money to win and suggests pausing rather than going away. Speaker 0 disagrees and vows to be the biggest pain for these people, even if it means they might try to kill him. Speaker 1 understands but advises caution.

Speaker 0 claims the Department of Government Efficiency found hundreds of billions in fraud, but Speaker 1 denies any fraud was found. Speaker 0 alleges Social Security is paying people over 220 years old, which Speaker 1 disputes. Speaker 1 criticizes Trump's anti-immigrant stance and calls Musk a "thug." Speaker 0 defends Trump, suggesting he might be the greatest president in modern American history. Speaker 1 calls Speaker 0 "deluded" for supporting Trump, characterizing Trump as rude, nasty, and racist. Speaker 0 accuses others of being in a cult, claiming they try to stop people from talking to those with different ideas. Speaker 0 says things got "hot" and troopers asked him to leave. Speaker 0 then shares the speech he planned to give, emphasizing that all are Americans with First Amendment rights and should unite to eliminate corruption.

Speaker 0 questions if the theory of secretly saving the world from a satanic cult of pedophiles and cannibals is something Speaker 1 supports. Speaker 1 responds by saying they haven't heard of it, but they are open to the idea of helping to save the world and are willing to put themselves out there.

Speaker 0 asks how people can trust Speaker 1 and if he is part of the cabal. Speaker 1 responds by saying not to trust him, but to trust themselves. He dismisses the idea of controlled opposition and urges people to do their own research and make their own decisions. He criticizes those who claim they don't know what to do and tells them to grow up. Speaker 1 talks about his dedication to fighting for causes and calls out politicians for not addressing important issues. He expresses frustration with people who worry about controlled opposition and accuses them of being lazy and selfish. He ends by telling people to stop asking him questions and to take action themselves.

The speaker salutes unvaccinated individuals, calling them courageous for standing against a trillion-dollar propaganda machine and telling the government, bosses, jobs, and businesses to "off." The speaker believes everyone had a choice regarding vaccination, even if it meant facing tough decisions like losing a job, business, or family. They claim that vaccinated individuals "sold their soul" for a price, while the unvaccinated lost everything but kept their integrity. The speaker generally distrusts vaccinated people and trusts unvaccinated people. They believe that in a future pandemic, vaccinated individuals will throw others under the bus to protect themselves, their jobs, money, and titles.

Speaker 0 argues that conspiracy theories have been made to look like lunacy, noting that the Kennedy assassination popularized the term “conspiracy theorist.” He says it wasn’t widely used before Kennedy, but afterward it became a label for “kooks,” and he’s repeatedly been called that. Speaker 1 acknowledges this dynamic. He and Speaker 0 discuss what a conspiracy is—“more people working together to do something nefarious?”—and Speaker 0 asserts that conspiracies have always happened. He disputes the view that most conspiracies are due to ineptitude, insisting that when there is profit, power, control, and resources involved, most conspiracies, in fact, turn out to be true. He adds that the deeper you dig, the more you realize there’s a concerted effort to make conspiracies seem ridiculous so people won’t be seen as fools. Speaker 1 remarks on the ridicule as well, and Speaker 0 reiterates his own self-description: “I am a conspiracy theorist,” a “foolish person,” and “a professional clown.” He mocks the idea that being labeled foolish is a barrier, and reflects on how others perceive him. Speaker 0 then provides specific, provocative examples of conspiracies he believes are real: Gulf of Tonkin was faked to justify U.S. entry into Vietnam; production of heroin ramped up to 94% of the world’s supply once the U.S. occupied Afghanistan; and the CIA, in the United States, allegedly sold heroin or cocaine in Los Angeles ghettos to fund the Contras versus the Sandinistas in Nicaragua. He states clearly that these claims are real and asserts that there are conspiracy theorists who are “fucking real.” Speaker 1 pushes back on reputation and judgment, and Speaker 0 reaffirms his self-identification as a conspiracy theorist who faces mockery. Speaker 1 suggests that this stance might give him a “superpower.”

There is no evidence to support conspiracy theories, so people should go outside and stop paying attention to young men on the Internet. Things are not that deep, and there is no conspiracy with everything. The speaker, age 21, interviewed a governor and was not told what questions to ask. His wife knows how to do things and is currently cooking dinner. The speaker knows Kevin with Governor Shapiro's team and is excited for him. He does not want to expose any information, but it is already out there due to the Freedom of Information Act.

The speaker claims that the system is rigged and that we are the ones who truly protect ourselves, not the company, scientists, or government. They argue that the media constantly tells us what to believe and buy, making us believe we have freedom of choice when we don't. The speaker asserts that big wealthy businesses control everything, including land, corporations, politics, and media. They state that the elite across the world are becoming more powerful, while the majority of people in every country don't want that. The speaker believes that those in power want obedient workers, not critical thinkers. They mention that this goes against the idea of Americans valuing independence.

In this video, Speaker 0 confronts Speaker 1, accusing him of being anti-American and anti-free speech. Speaker 0 criticizes Speaker 1 for working at CNN and trying to censor conservative voices. Speaker 1 denies the accusations and refuses to engage in an interview with Speaker 0. The conversation becomes heated, with Speaker 0 calling Speaker 1 a liar and a fraud. Speaker 0 also accuses CNN of being fake news and engaging in racketeering. The video ends with Speaker 0 expressing his belief that the truth about Speaker 1 and CNN will eventually come out.

The term "controlled opposition" exists for a reason. Meeting people in real life gives you a better sense of who they are, though it's not foolproof. Take Alex Jones, for example. People accuse him of being controlled, but I know his staff, and I've known him for years. Is he really faking his entire life? I've been on his show and seen his prep work; it's the same even when no one's watching. I was really woken up by his video on the World Trade Organization protests in Seattle. He showed masked men in military uniforms creating chaos, which allowed the police to move in. These people then negotiated with the police and were released, just like Patriot Front. Sometimes you just have to relax a little bit and activate your animal instinct while driving your cerebral cortex with emotion, like Emperor Palpatine.