reSee.it - Related Video Feed

A lead regulatory scientist at Johnson & Johnson, Joshua Rees, allegedly admitted the company's COVID vaccine was "not safe and effective" and that they wanted to "just throw the vaccine creation to the wind and see what happens." According to the scientist, the federal government pressured pharmaceutical companies to quickly create the vaccine, prioritizing speed over safety and efficacy. He stated that typical clinical trials were skipped, and testing was limited to lab models. He also stated that the government made a deal with pharmaceutical companies to solve the problem. The scientist discussed side effects, stating that the question was whether the benefit outweighed the worst possible side effect, using cancer patients as an example where quality of life is prioritized. The CDC has pulled the J&J vaccine due to declining use and the company's strategic shift. The scientist was approached for clarification but denied his identity and evaded questions.

Justin Leslie, a whistleblower from Pfizer, reveals explosive information in an interview with Project Veritas. He discusses conversations with Pfizer employees about the mRNA vaccines and their side effects. The employees admit that mRNA vaccines have been known to have side effects for years and that Pfizer and Moderna used the emergency of the pandemic to push through the vaccines. They also discuss the lack of proper clinical trials and the use of the emergency authorization to bypass normal procedures. Leslie questions why safer vaccine formulations were not explored and highlights concerns about the impact on menstrual cycles and fertility. He also raises suspicions about the presence of graphene oxide in the vaccines. Leslie criticizes James O'Keefe, the founder of Project Veritas, for burying the more significant information he provided.

A lead regulatory scientist at Johnson & Johnson, Joshua Rees, allegedly admitted on hidden camera that the J&J COVID vaccine was "not safe and effective" and that the company wanted to "just throw the vaccine creation to the wind and see what happens." According to the scientist, the federal government pressured pharmaceutical companies to quickly create the vaccine, prioritizing speed over safety and efficacy. He claimed the typical testing process was skipped, and the vaccine was tested on lab models instead of undergoing extensive clinical trials. The scientist stated that the government "kinda made a deal with pharmaceutical companies" to solve the problem. He also discussed weighing potential side effects against the benefits for consumers, suggesting a different standard for cancer patients, as they are "gonna die anyway." The CDC has announced they are pulling the J&J vaccine from use in the United States.

Brooke Jackson, a former clinical trial worker, witnessed numerous instances of malfeasance and misfeasance during her time supervising the clinical trials for Pfizer's COVID-19 vaccine. She observed needles sticking out of bags, private information displayed publicly, patients not being properly monitored, incorrect blood collection methods, and lack of informed consent. The trials were supposed to be randomized and placebo-blinded, but they were neither. The vaccine was not stored at the correct temperature, and baseline data was not collected. Additionally, the data was doctored, certifications were falsified, and fraudulent invoices were submitted to the FDA and the defense department. Jackson reported these issues to the FDA in September 2020.

Speaker 0 described a guest whose 18-year-old daughter was injected with Pfizer and developed cancer. He stated that he has sat across numerous people who lost their children to these injections, with some deaths immediate and others gruesome, and that these people must testify to lawmakers and others recounting their stories repeatedly. He framed this as a massive crime that needs to stop. He asserted that the FDA was fully aware that these injections would cause cancer, citing published guidance documents. He claimed that the FDA regulates the industry and, in 2015 and 2013 (and even more recently), wrote extensive guidance documents explaining to manufacturers developing mRNA products that they must study risks, including cancer, death, fertility issues, blindness, strokes, and cardiovascular issues. He said these risks were documented as regulatory knowledge and that manufacturers were told they had to study these risks and exclude them. He also claimed that studying these risks in healthy volunteers was not allowed because it was considered unethical. He contrasted this with 2020, stating that “all of a sudden, all of this is solved,” calling it a joke, and that this period raised his suspicions, prompting him to investigate independently. He concluded by describing the situation as a premeditated crime in which regulators knew, and that the military conducted a “fake exercise” to capture all these pharmaceutical companies and compel them to create these weapons.

The speaker claims Pfizer documents reveal the COVID vaccines didn't work to stop the virus a month after rollout in November 2020. They allege Pfizer knew the third most common side effect was COVID. Within months, Pfizer supposedly needed to hire 2,400 staffers to process adverse event reports. The speaker asserts Pfizer and the FDA knew in May 2021 that the vaccines caused heart damage in 35 minors within a week of injection, but this wasn't disclosed to parents until August 2021. The speaker states the CDC initially claimed the injection materials stayed at the injection site, but Pfizer knew they biodistributed throughout the body within 48 hours, settling in the brain, liver, adrenals, spleen, and ovaries. Pathologist Dr. Robert Chandler allegedly found no mechanism for the body to eliminate lipid nanoparticles from the ovaries, leading to accumulation with each injection.

Speaker 0 argues that because it’s classified as a vaccine, they don’t have to worry about being sued. Speaker 1 counters that there is immunity from liability dependent on there having been no fraud, and asserts that there clearly was fraud, so in light of that... Speaker 0 expresses surprise at known caveats to liability. Speaker 1 confirms the caveats and says it makes the situation more interesting. Speaker 0 asks how fraud is defined in this context, noting that drugs were sold with many studies but only one was good. Speaker 1 responds, “Let's try this one,” and discusses safety testing: the insufficient amount of safety testing before release was done with mRNA vaccines produced in a process that did not involve DNA. The product injected into billions of people involved DNA plasmids, with massive contamination in the shots actually delivered, including the SV40 promoter (simian virus 40). The point is that safety testing was performed on one process, but people were injected with something different that had other components not tested, which Speaker 1 calls fraudulent. Speaker 0 asks for an explanation of the SV40 issue. Speaker 1 explains production methods: techniques to generate product using a plasmid, a circular piece of DNA, allowing vats to grow the product before coating in lipid nanoparticle, with bacteria doing the work. There is a requirement to purify DNA and set standards for residual DNA contamination. In this case, not only was quality control poor, but there was a much more painstaking way to produce the same product that did not involve DNA plasmids at all. As a result, vials given to Kevin McKernan, containing material actually injected into people, showed DNA contamination across the board. Speaker 1 states that leftover DNA includes the SV40 promoter, a genetic trigger from simian virus 40, which is carcinogenic. This promoter is left over in vials from shots actually injected into people, implying that the claims about the potential for mRNA shots to integrate into the genome were incorrect. Speaker 1 asserts that there is DNA in the vials, not just some old DNA, and that it includes the SV40 promoter, a genetic engineering tool with carcinogenic potential. Therefore, Speaker 1 concludes, this seems to be clear fraud: you can’t inject a different product into the public on the basis of safety testing conducted with a product produced by a different process.

It turns out that the manufacturers did not do due diligence to ensure these were safe products before they were released onto the American market. And throughout 2021 to 2024, the drug companies essentially ran the pandemic response. Judicial Watch, America's first legal, were able to obtain some documents. They didn't want to release it. Pfizer, they wanted a seventy year moratorium on the clinical data from the trials, which from the start showed these never prevented infection, never prevented disease transmission. And there's no good clinical data to ever show it reduced the severity of disease. The CDC in response, I don't know what's wrong with that once fine agency, but they've become a supplicant of big pharma. No. The paper's been torn to shreds by epidemiologists. It was based against a computer model and against an idea where you have the peak and it comes down and then it goes back up again.

A lead regulatory scientist at Johnson & Johnson, Joshua Rees, was secretly recorded stating the J&J COVID vaccine was "not safe and effective" and that the company wanted to "just throw the vaccine creation to the wind and see what happens." He claimed the government pressured pharmaceutical companies to quickly create the vaccine, prioritizing speed over safety and efficacy. According to Rees, "we basically just had a race to figure out who could solve it best. People wanted it. We gave it to them." He also stated that typical clinical trials were skipped, and lab route models were used instead. Rees described a risk-benefit analysis where potential side effects were weighed against the perceived benefit, even in cases where patients, like those with cancer, were already facing a terminal prognosis. Confronted on camera, Rees initially denied his identity and then evaded questions. The CDC has pulled the J&J vaccine from use in the United States.

The speaker claims that vaccines are ineffective, using Israel as an example. They also mention a whistleblower revealing falsified death numbers after vaccination. Serious side effects like neurological disorders, thromboses, and myocarditis are mentioned. Experts predict problems for vaccinated individuals when encountering the wild virus due to immune system damage caused by the vaccines. The speaker alleges that the CDC was aware of the side effects before the vaccine rollout. The manufacturers are accused of not knowing the effectiveness or dangers of their vaccines but demand immunity from claims. They also insist on their products being purchased even if alternative treatments exist.

A lead regulatory scientist at Johnson & Johnson, Joshua Rees, was secretly recorded stating the company's COVID vaccine was "not safe and effective" and that J&J "just threw the vaccine creation to the wind and see what happens." He said the government pressured pharmaceutical companies to quickly create the vaccine. Rees stated that typical clinical trials were skipped, and testing was limited to lab models. He acknowledged potential side effects, stating that the risk was weighed against the benefit, using cancer patients as an example where quality of life was prioritized over curing the disease. The CDC has pulled the J&J vaccine due to declining use. When confronted about his statements, Rees denied his identity and evaded questions. The investigation aims to expose corruption and lies in government, corporations, and the pharmaceutical industry.

I recently heard stories of people losing their children to Pfizer injections, some experiencing immediate or gruesome deaths. The FDA knew about potential risks like cancer from as far back as 2013, but suddenly in 2020, these concerns were ignored. This seems like a premeditated crime, with regulators aware of the dangers. Military involvement in pushing these products is suspicious.

A lead regulatory scientist at Johnson & Johnson, Joshua Rees, allegedly admitted that the J&J COVID vaccine was "not safe and effective" and that the company wanted to "just throw the vaccine creation to the wind and see what happens." According to the scientist, the federal government pressured pharmaceutical companies to quickly create the vaccine, prioritizing speed over safety and efficacy. He claimed the typical clinical trial testing process was skipped, and the vaccine was tested on lab models instead. The scientist stated that the government made a deal with pharmaceutical companies to solve the problem. He also discussed weighing the worst potential side effects against the benefits for consumers, suggesting a different standard for cancer patients, who were "gonna die anyway." The CDC has previously announced they're pulling the J&J vaccine from use in The United States. J&J claims this is due to the vaccine's declining use and the company's strategic shift away from the vaccines.

A lead regulatory scientist at Johnson & Johnson, Joshua Rees, was secretly recorded stating the company's COVID vaccine was "not safe and effective" and that J&J "just throw[s] the vaccine creation to the wind and see what happens." He said the government pressured pharmaceutical companies to quickly create the vaccine. According to Rees, the typical clinical trial testing process was bypassed, and the vaccine was tested on lab models to "see if it works." He acknowledged the lack of research and the potential for side effects, stating that for cancer patients, the focus was on quality of life rather than a cure. The CDC has pulled the J&J vaccine from use in the United States, which J&J claims is due to declining use and a strategic shift. When confronted about his statements, Rees denied his identity and went into a restroom.

you were promoted to the FDA classifies the vaccine as a drug. You were told it was safe. You were told it was effective. Mister Fauci, you made the statement that none of these shots will prevent transmission. You also stated that none of these shots will prevent you from getting the virus. So you're telling the people to take a shot that will will not prevent you from getting the virus and that will not prevent you from transmitting the virus if you do get it. The ultimate agenda is two things. One profit, which we all know is the pharmaceutical companies and agencies middle name. The word pharmaceutical comes from the Greek word pharmakia, which is in the bible. Pharmakia means sorcery and or witchcraft. You are now and have been experimented on. The Johnson and Johnson shot has aborted fetal tissue from aborted babies from the retina, as well as the kidney cells. Johnson and Johnson, you playing too much. You had over twenty five thousand cases of cancer racking up to over $4,000,000,000 of lawsuits. Why should we trust Moderna, the youngest one in the group? Ain't never created no vaccine, and this is not even a vaccine. We are getting banged on by institutions at high levels. We ain't got nothing on them.

At the outset, a process was approved by the FDA for emergency use authorization. However, it was later discovered that the approved process was swapped out for one containing contaminants like DNA and a cancer-causing substance. Pfizer redacted 800 pages of the manufacturing process, hiding the fact that a carcinogen was included. This lack of transparency led to no informed consent and potential harm to individuals. The vaccine rollout included a trial with a 2.4 times higher adverse event rate, including the presence of a carcinogen.

The speaker discusses the vaccine's link to death and disability, citing over 37,000 deaths globally reported on VAERS. They criticize regulators for not addressing this issue earlier and mention a conversation with Francis Collins about vaccine-related deaths. The speaker also mentions a conversation with Dr. Redfield, who admitted downplaying vaccine injuries to avoid creating hesitancy. Dr. Redfield acknowledged that there are more injuries than reported.

Speaker 0: I find information like this, you know, inserts for the vaccine. Paper's there, and there's nothing printed on it. I find that very interesting, disheartening, disgusting, and lots of other words, but then it gets better. It just keep wait. There's more. It just keeps happening. The CDC redacts every single word of a 148 page study on a myocarditis after COVID vaccination. So I asked research to print the study for me. 148 pages. The entire thing is redacted. What good does a study do if there's nothing there? Then I wanna know, wait, what might have been there that they needed to redact it? That's even scarier. Speaker 1: We're witnessing an active cover up of a colossal consumer product safety debacle that is is basically affecting the entire world. Mhmm. So in The United States, our CDC, National Institutes of Health, and the FDA are actively involved in a cover up. And the same is occurring in The UK with the MHRA, Europe with European medicine agencies, and Australia with the Therapeutic Goods Administration. Something is going on that's very big. Each one of these companies that puts out a product has an obligation to produce ninety days of safety monitoring after their product comes out. It's a regulatory dossier. If somebody has a problem with the new product and they call the company like Pfizer, Pfizer has to report, write down what happened, and they have to collate that in a report and produce it and make it publicly available. When it came to ninety days with Pfizer, the first vaccine that came out, remember Pfizer was approved 12/10/2020. Pfizer didn't produce the report. And then people started asking, well, what's happening with your vaccine? And Pfizer would not disclose what happened. And then it went to court. And the lawyer for the FDA stepped in and said they don't wanna release Pfizer's dossier for fifty five years. Mhmm. Oh. Fifty five years. And the the the plaintiff pushed. And finally, slowly, the Pfizer dossier came out. Pfizer recorded one thousand two hundred and twenty three deaths with their product within ninety days of release. People were calling Pfizer in desperation watching their family members die after taking the vaccine. Pfizer recorded over twelve hundred new adverse events, new problems that doctor Boden has talked to you about that we are grappling with the entire time. But the point is our FDA worked to cover this up. The FDA should be regulating this company. FDA should have been having at least monthly meetings and fully disclosing what was going on with these novel vaccines, which are a genetic transfer technology platform.

The speaker states that they believed Pfizer had two legal definitions for their jab for nefarious reasons, suspecting one would be used for FDA approval while the other, containing SV40, would be released to the public. This suspicion stems from the 1950s polio vaccine contamination with SV40. The speaker recounts how Dr. Ochsner tested the polio vaccine on his grandchildren, resulting in one death and one case of polio. Ochsner then alerted the "industrial military complex" to the problem. Dr. Bernice Eddy at the NIH discovered SV40 contamination in the polio vaccines but was silenced after revealing it. The speaker distrusted the COVID response due to this history and suspected Pfizer's use of the SV40 promoter. Kevin McKernan later tested expired vials and found SV40, suggesting a deliberate scheme to harm people who received the jab.

Speaker 0: They argue that because the vaccine is classified as such, they don’t have to worry about being sued. They claim immunity from liability is dependent on there being no fraud, and there clearly was fraud. Speaker 1: They say there is fraud. They note that immunity from liability depends on fraud, and in light of that, it matters. They explain that there was fraud. Speaker 0: Expresses surprise and asks for caveats about fraud. Acknowledges there were caveats. Speaker 1: Confirms there is fraud and says it makes the situation more interesting. Speaker 0: Asks how fraud is defined, noting that drugs were sold with multiple studies and only one was good. Speaker 1: Responds with a point about safety testing for the mRNA vaccines. States that the insufficient safety testing was done before release, and that the product injected into billions of people involved DNA plasmids. There is massive contamination in the shots actually delivered, including the SV40 promoter from simian virus 40. The point is that safety testing for one drug was completed, but people were injected with something different that had other components that were not tested, which is described as fraudulent. Speaker 0: Requests an explanation of the SV40 issue for the audience. Speaker 1: Describes production techniques used to generate the product. Explains that a plasmid, a circular piece of DNA, was used to produce the product in vats, with bacteria performing the production, later coated in lipid nanoparticle. There is a requirement to purify DNA and set standards for DNA contamination, with limits that cannot be exceeded. In this case, the problem isn’t only poor quality control but that there was a more painstaking way to produce the same product that did not involve DNA plasmids at all. Consequently, leftover material in vials injected into people contained DNA contamination across the board. Kevin McKernan tested vials, finding DNA contamination in the samples. Speaker 1: Explains that the DNA left over includes the SV40 promoter, a genetic trigger from simian virus 40, which is known to be carcinogenic. Since this promoter is left in the vials from injections given to people, it challenges the claim that the mRNA shots could not integrate into the genome. While acknowledging that there are cellular processes such as reverse transcription, the speaker asserts that even the claim of “no DNA” is false because there is DNA in the vials, specifically DNA with the SV40 promoter, a genetic engineering tool with carcinogenic potential. The speaker concludes that this appears to be fraud: injecting a different product into the public on the basis of safety testing that was conducted with a product produced by a different process. Speaker 0: Reiterates the conclusion: you can’t inject a different product into the public on the basis of safety testing that was done with something produced by a different process.

A lead regulatory scientist at Johnson & Johnson, Joshua Rees, was secretly recorded stating the company's COVID vaccine was "not safe and effective" and that J&J "just throw[s] the vaccine creation to the wind and see what happens." He said the government pressured pharmaceutical companies to quickly create the vaccine. Rees stated that typical clinical trials were skipped, and the vaccine was tested on lab models to "see if it works." He also said that the lack of research should not be surprising. According to Rees, the government made a deal with pharmaceutical companies to solve the problem. He also stated that when considering side effects, the company weighs the worst possible outcome against the potential benefit, even if it means accepting that "cancer patients gonna die anyway." When confronted about his statements, Rees denied his identity and went into the women's restroom.

A lead regulatory scientist at Johnson & Johnson, Joshua Rees, was secretly recorded stating the J&J COVID vaccine was "not safe and effective" and that the company wanted to "just throw the vaccine creation to the wind and see what happens." He said the government pressured pharmaceutical companies to quickly create the vaccine. According to Rees, the typical clinical trial testing process was skipped, and testing was limited to lab route models. Rees stated that the government and pharmaceutical companies were in a race to solve the problem. He also said that the worst possible side effect was weighed against the benefit to the consumer, and in the case of cancer patients, quality of life was prioritized over curing anything. The CDC has pulled the J&J vaccine from use in the US, citing declining use and a strategic shift by the company. When confronted about his statements, Rees denied his identity and went into a women's restroom.

Pfizer's claim of 96% efficacy for their vaccine was questioned. The study and data were not independently verified, and Pfizer wanted to keep the data hidden for 75 years. The true effectiveness of the vaccine, based on absolute risk reduction, is less than 1%. More people died and were harmed in their trials compared to the placebo group. The vaccine's safety was questionable from the start, and it is not effective. Additionally, appropriate studies were not conducted for new variants.

Pfizer has been forced to release previously secret documents, including FDA approval packages, due to court orders and successful FOIA requests. These documents reveal that Pfizer tested different versions of their vaccine during preclinical and clinical trials, which goes against FDA guidance. The different versions included modified RNA, unmodified RNA, self-amplifying RNA, and Spike protein alone. Surprisingly, all these versions were tested under the same investigational new drug number, despite FDA guidance stating that multiple versions should have their own individual numbers. Additionally, the toxicity of the mRNA active ingredient in the COVID-19 vaccines was never studied. This raises concerns about the regulatory process and the lack of safety testing.

Speaker 0 says they found “information like this,” such as vaccine insert paper, with “nothing printed on it,” which they call disheartening and disgusting. They add that it “just keeps happening” and claim the CDC redacts “every single word” of a 148-page study on a myocarditis after COVID vaccination. Speaker 0 says they asked someone to print the study, and that the entire 148 pages are redacted. They ask what a study does if “there’s nothing there,” and they ask what might have been there that required redaction. Speaker 1 says they are “witnessing an active cover up” involving “a colossal consumer product safety debacle” affecting the entire world. They claim that in the United States, the CDC, National Institutes of Health, and FDA are actively involved in a cover up, and that similar cover ups are occurring in the UK with the MHRA, in Europe with European medicine agencies, and in Australia with the Therapeutic Goods Administration. Speaker 1 states that each company that puts out a product has an obligation to produce “ninety days of safety monitoring” after the product comes out, describing it as a regulatory dossier. They claim that if someone has a problem and reports it to a company like Pfizer, Pfizer must report, write down what happened, collate it into a report, and make it publicly available. Speaker 1 says that when the ninety days elapsed for Pfizer’s first vaccine approved on 12/10/2020, Pfizer “didn’t produce a report.” They add that people asked what was happening with the vaccine, and Pfizer allegedly would not disclose what happened, leading to a court case. Speaker 1 says the lawyer for the FDA stepped in to say they did not want to release Pfizer’s dossier for fifty-five years. Speaker 1 then says that after the plaintiff pushed, the Pfizer dossier “slowly” came out. They claim Pfizer recorded one thousand two hundred and twenty-three deaths with their product within ninety days of release, and they say people called Pfizer in desperation watching family members die after taking the vaccine. Speaker 1 also claims Pfizer recorded “over twelve hundred” new adverse events and refers to “doctor Boden” discussing problems they say they have been grappling with. They conclude by claiming the FDA worked to cover this up and should have been regulating the company with at least monthly meetings and full disclosure about novel vaccines, described by Speaker 1 as a genetic transfer technology platform and as the first time human beings were injected with foreign genetic material in world history, after which “they were getting it full on.” Speaker 1 ends by saying “Two thirds of the world’s population took”