TruthArchive.ai - Related Video Feed

In downtown Minneapolis, James O'Keefe meets Levon Mohammed, also known as King Levon One, who claims to have hundreds of blank absentee ballots in his car. Levon discusses how money is the key to winning elections and mentions that people in Hanover are paid to fill out the absentee ballots. He also reveals that seniors in three towers collect every ballot, even without payment. Young people and women who didn't vote on the ballots were given cash incentives. Levon emphasizes that the system is against them and that they are victims. He mentions that they were instructed to stay at home and fill out the ballots.

The speakers discuss what they describe as a mass and opaque operation affecting elections. They claim that the total amount involved is “way beyond anybody’s imagination” and that neither the state nor the federal government knows it. They allege that a judge would bow to the head of the “Somalian mafia,” and describe the situation as a voting block whose members will vote together. They state that if someone does something against “our community,” they will vote for that person’s opponent, asserting that there is ballot harvesting and that they have witnessed it firsthand. The implication is that the voting bloc coordinates to influence election outcomes. They describe Cedar Riverside as a major, massive apartment complex and ask how many Somalis live there, noting that there are “one complex” and “20 more just like this around the Twin Cities,” totaling “probably a 100,000 or more people.” They claim these people are all Somali and are “living rent free.” They further claim they are driving vehicles paid for by others, eating food paid for by others, and that “they’re everything they do is something that you paid for,” implying that public funds or subsidies support them. The speakers allege that an entire block will vote for a single candidate, with “one person” going to collect all the ballots. They assert there is no tracking and that there could be multiple people living in an apartment, possibly nine ballots, with someone then “collect[ing] all the ballots.” The dialogue emphasizes a coordinated effort to manipulate voting outcomes through ballot collection and bloc voting, portraying the Somali community as organized to vote as a unified force in elections while alleging widespread use of ballot harvesting and ballot collection practices.

The discussion revolves around ballot counting issues at the dome during the election. It was reported that Democrats resumed counting after Republicans left due to supposed leak issues. Video evidence shows Democrats returning to count ballots, with claims of ballot stuffing occurring during that time. There are allegations of canvassers being paid to collect absentee ballots, which raises legal concerns. The conversation highlights strategies to manipulate vote counts without drawing attention, particularly in areas with established voting patterns. Investigations are mentioned, along with the recognition of individuals involved in suspicious activities. Overall, there is a focus on potential election fraud and the mechanisms behind it.

They were paid to collect ballots from elderly people, receiving around $12 per ballot. The scheme involved requesting mail-in ballots and filling them out for the Democratic party. Leticia Sanchez was paid to recruit others to collect votes, with ballot applications sent from former city councilman Sal Espino's office.

The discussion revolves around the ballot counting process during the election. It highlights that while Democrats were allowed to count ballots after Republicans left, there were claims of ballot stuffing caught on video. The conversation touches on how absentee ballots were collected and the legality of the process, with suggestions that canvassers were paid to gather these ballots. There's speculation about why certain areas were targeted for vote manipulation, emphasizing the need to avoid raising red flags in historically red counties. The participants mention ongoing investigations and evidence from surveillance footage, indicating a belief that irregularities occurred during the election.

They were paid to collect and sign absentee ballots, earning around $1200 a day. The process involved getting personal information from elderly voters and filling out ballots for them. The ballots were both paper and electronic. The completed ballots were then taken back to Stewart Clegg and Deborah Peoples, the district chair for the Democratic Party.

In this video, a mule is seen getting out of an SUV in the middle of the day in Georgia. The mule has a large number of ballots and struggles to fit them into the ballot box. It is illegal to turn in more than one ballot unless you are a close relative. The speaker confirms that all the ballots after the first one are illegal. There is a possibility that the mule could have been an assistor, but it is confirmed that Gwinnett County had no assistors. The speaker mentions trying to bring attention to this issue through open records.

The speakers discuss voter fraud and irregularities in Maricopa County. They mention that the county recorder, a former cartel attorney, allowed ballots to be restored and duplicated in a way that changed the intended votes. They also highlight issues with unsecured voting computers and the hand delivery of card readers for tabulation. They point out a significant difference in votes between the Republican governor and the Democrat senator, suggesting irregularities. They mention that races were called in favor of Republicans before being overturned during the recount. Additionally, they mention emergency polling places and door hangers without ID requirements in Democrat areas.

There is a discussion about the extent of election fraud, with one person believing it exists based on recent events in Arizona. Another person emphasizes that elections belong to the people and citizens should have transparency in the voting process. The first person expresses distrust in mainstream media. Both agree that something feels amiss, although the specifics are unclear.

We now know how elections are rigged, with Maricopa County mailing more ballots than voters. This shows extra ballots were printed to manipulate the election. States are avoiding scrutiny of ballots, and censorship of truth reveals we are on the right track.

The speakers discuss the numbers related to alleged voter fraud in the 2020 election. They estimate that about 7% of mail-in ballots, which amounts to approximately 4,800,000 votes, were involved in fraudulent activities across states like Arizona, Georgia, Pennsylvania, Michigan, and Wisconsin. They claim that this operation is widespread and happening in communities that receive funding from certain foundations. The speakers question who is stopping these fraudulent activities. Overall, they believe that voter fraud was a significant issue in the 2020 election.

Three Yeah. There was video. You could see the video. There was a video out and about that he has the ballots in his car Right. And talking about the only way you can win is with money. I was looking at them, and they were not filled. They were blank. Who is the one filling out the absentee ballots? People who work, with, like, in Admiral Omar. Where do they pay the money? The the minute we sign the thing, the election, that's what you get paid.

Illegal transfers were made to Runbeck, with phony deeds created by Britney used to move money to candidates through for-profit and nonprofit PACs. During the 2022 election, ballot scanners and printers at 70 precincts had printer setting changes via computer infiltration, despite pre-election testing. Uncontrollable ballots were placed in Box 3 and allegedly driven to Runbeck. In October 2020, over 100,000 filled-in ballots and over $13,000,000 were identified in unmarked rental cars, loaded at a Mesa residence, and driven to Runbeck's office. Deeds for Runbeck have been found. The strategy was for Hobbs to receive the Democratic nomination for governor and Fontes to run for Secretary of State. Both Hobbs and Fontes have Britney deeds, suggesting they are bribed recipients. Arizona being a border state with a large drug smuggling and human trafficking business, cartels invest to ensure officials keep their enterprise open. The fix for 2020 and 2022 started in 2017 with appointments of individuals bribed through a mortgage scheme and money laundering.

The speaker discusses a common theme in various locations involving the collection, bundling, and casting of ballots. They compare this pattern to what is happening in Atlanta, San Luis, Arizona, and other places. They emphasize that this is not just a coincidence, but rather an organized crime conspiracy.

Jacqueline Greger testifies to a preliminary finding report on activities impacting Arizona’s election integrity, focusing on the 2020 and 2022 general elections. She outlines a multi-year pattern beginning in 2017, alleging that “accents points” were used to change vote totals and election results, with illegal transfers moving money to candidates through phantom entities and for-profit and non-profit PACs created by Brittany Ray Chavez. She claims that during the 2022 election, ballot scanners and printers at 70 precincts had their printer settings changed through computer infiltration after being tested the night before the election, leading to uncontrollable ballots being placed in Box 3 and allegedly driven to Runbeck’s office. Witness information from October 2020 is cited, including more than 100,000 filed-in ballots and more than 13,000,000 identified in two unmarked rental cars used to move ballots and cash to Runbeck’s office. Runbeck is described as operated by Robert Runbeck, with deeds for Runbeck provided in the materials. Greger asserts a planned strategy involving Hobbs and Fontes: Hobbs would receive the Democratic nomination for governor, Fontes would run for secretary of state to replace Hobbs, and both would be bribe recipients evidenced by “Britney deeds.” She argues the fix for 2020 and 2022 started in 2017 with appointments to election positions of individuals bribed through a mortgage scheme and money laundering via phantom appointments. She emphasizes “the problems with these documents are many” and connects money laundering to drug cartel activity and human trafficking, arguing cartel investment aims to place reliable figures in key positions to advance their objectives. The report titled Preliminary Findings of Activities Impacting Arizona’s Election Integrity with specific focus on the 2020 and 2022 general elections is introduced by Greger, who provides her background: she has a master’s in marketing and honors degrees in finance, accounting, statistics, economics, and business strategy; resident of Scottsdale since 1997; owner of Finebreder Insurance Agency; principal investigator with Harris Thaler Law Firm since 2019. The team, led by John Harris Thaler (a 32-year attorney), investigates racketeering and corruption across multiple states. Thaler’s past work includes uncovering laundering of cartel money through real estate in Illinois, Idaho, and Iowa; real estate agents, escrow companies, and title insurers indicted for racketeering; investigations into money laundering through Arizona real estate; and a broader operation intertwining narcotics trafficking, tax evasion, payroll theft, bankruptcy fraud, insurance fraud, and election fraud. Greger states that more than 120,000 documents have been reviewed and that 47 filings exist in the report. She outlines a pattern of money laundering through single-family residences, inflated construction invoices, fake charitable donations, fictitious students in private schools, and fake bankruptcies. Wells Fargo and other banks are alleged to have opened accounts for phantom people; municipal and state systems in Mesa, including a private police force, are said to be compromised to support racketeering. She claims numerous forged or altered documents, including falsified deeds of trust and notary acts, with signatures forged or copied, often associated with Brittany Chavez and Donna Chavez. Key individuals and entities are named as bribe recipients and conspirators: Kathleen M. Hobbs and Patrick T. Goodman appear in a series of deeds with signatures and notarizations that Greger says are fraudulent; Brittany and Donna Chavez are identified as principal preparers of documents; the Maricopa County Recorder’s Office and relevant courts are alleged to have been infiltrated to upload falsified documents and remove legitimate ones. Greger discusses targeted election service providers, including Runbeck, and asserts that “the county database” has “no integrity whatsoever,” with backdoor access enabling document upload or deletion. She describes bribes to judges, prosecutors, and public officials across the state, including 25% of active judges in certain jurisdictions, and claims that elections including the governor, attorney general, and other offices were affected. Greger notes investigations are not limited to Arizona; FBI, IRS, US attorneys’ offices, and attorney generals in California and New Mexico have engaged with the findings. She emphasizes that the final report will be a 300-page book with about 3,000 attachments, to be published as Report to the Governor, and that excerpts and documentation will be available at reporttothegovernor.com. She clarifies that she and Thaler do not represent political candidates or parties, and that Thaler had not voted or donated in 2022. She closes by describing the data’s potential utility for enforcement agencies and asks for questions; a constituent video is requested to be played.

Jacqueline Breger presented preliminary findings on activities impacting Arizona's election integrity, focusing on the 2020 and 2022 general elections. She described a racketeering investigation tied to money laundering via real estate, fake deeds of trust, forged notarizations, bribery, and infiltration of state databases. Key points: money laundered through single-family residences in Arizona since 1994; over 120,000 documents reviewed and 47 filings; a final report titled 'Report to the Governor'—a 300-page book with about 3,000 attachments. Breger claimed 'The City of Mesa is a racketeering organization' and that 'the Maricopa County database ... has absolutely no integrity whatsoever.' She alleged 25,000 falsified ballots and more than 100,000 ballots affected, with $13,000,000 in two unmarked rental cars; Runbeck Election Services implicated; figures including Katie Hobbs, Andre Fontes, Steven Richer named. Data was given to Governor Ducey in 2022 and shared with FBI and state AGs.

Motor voter laws are being exploited to pack voter rolls, yet lawmakers in Arizona have not acted to address this. If voting machines are the issue, why is there a need for such extensive voter roll manipulation? The focus should be on doing what’s right from the start, rather than relying on those who prioritize donations or superficial qualities. The speaker emphasizes their expertise in software, which underpins the voting process, and highlights the importance of focusing on ballots rather than machines. They point out that isolated cases of voter fraud are used to downplay the larger issue of election fraud, which is a serious crime. The real problem lies in election interference and rigging.

We found 10,000 people using the same Social Security number. They are brought in illegally and given a number to pay taxes. Companies hire them across various plants and factories, all using the same number. The IRS only checks if there's an employer associated with the number, validating it. These individuals then use the number to obtain driver's licenses, leading to voter suppression. The government ignores this issue and these individuals don't pay taxes, as companies deduct them. The government has a $1.7 trillion slush fund, generating $100 million in interest monthly. This information is unsettling, revealing a corrupt system benefiting everyone involved.

Arizona has become the center of election integrity concerns after the 2020 presidential election was decided by less than 11,000 votes. The primary concern is that noncitizens could be registering to vote and participating in American elections. Mainstream media outlets such as The Washington Post, Rolling Stone, and NPR have minimized the issue, calling it dishonest, nonexistent, or a myth. An investigation was conducted at the Los Pecinos apartment complex in Phoenix, Arizona, where residents were asked about their voter registration status and citizenship. The responses obtained allegedly contradict the narrative that noncitizen participation in U.S. elections is a conspiracy theory. Some individuals interviewed admitted to being registered to vote despite not being citizens, and expressed their intention to vote in the upcoming election.

Speaker 0 visits a location in California described as “home to a porta john and a giant empty parking lot,” yet inside this empty lot there are “registered voters.” He states that there are “26 registered voters for this exact location. 100 Sunset Avenue in Venice. 26 people registered to a porta john and an empty parking lot. Where do their ballots go exactly? So who's picking up the ballots? Who's voting for the people in this lovely porta john empty lot? Ask the question.” He concludes, “I think you know the answer.”

Raquel Rodriguez discusses buying votes for various political candidates in Texas, mentioning prices ranging from $5 to $10 per vote. She also talks about securing positions for judges and city council members in exchange for money and political influence. Rodriguez boasts about her connections and influence over politicians, including judges and state representatives. She emphasizes the importance of getting the right people elected and mentions working with both Republicans and Democrats to achieve her goals. Rodriguez's actions highlight the prevalence of voter and election fraud, urging authorities to take action.

An SUV arrives, and a "mule" exits with ballots to deposit in a drop box. It is claimed that this person is one of 2,000 that have been profiled. The individual is said to have so many ballots that they struggle to fit them into the slot, inserting them one by one. It is stated that turning in more than one ballot is illegal in Georgia, unless the person is a close relative. It is asserted that everything past the first ballot was illegal. It's mentioned that the person could have been an assistor, which would require a signed envelope. Open records allegedly confirmed that Gwinnett County had no assistors.

The video provides an overview of the controversies surrounding the 2022 general election in Arizona, specifically in Maricopa County. It mentions the high voter turnout and the closely contested race for governor. Concerns are raised about candidates avoiding debates and the security and accuracy of the election process. Issues with tabulators, printers, and signature verification are highlighted, along with unauthorized testing of machines and the discovery of fit-to-page ballots. The trial of an election lawsuit is discussed, alleging misconduct with ballot printers and handling. The video raises questions about transparency and the integrity of the election system. The speakers emphasize the need for hand counting ballots at the precinct level to ensure accuracy and restore trust in the election system, urging viewers to take action and demand changes to prevent future election fraud.

They were paid to collect absentee ballots from elderly people, receiving around $12 per ballot. This was part of a vote harvesting scheme in Tarrant County, where ballots were filled out for the Democratic party. Leticia Sanchez received money to pay others who collected votes, with ballot applications coming from former city councilman Sal Espino's office.

Speaker 0 presents what he calls an explosive piece of tape: a man buys a registration form for an absentee ballot from a voter, pocketing $200 and expecting to collect the ballot when the voter receives it. Speaker 1 reacts, noting the illegality of the act and questioning why it isn’t illegal to do certain things, followed by a line that “We don’t get illegal” and a claim about lions, then attributes responsibility to someone who “came up with all this.” Speaker 0 continues, stating that she started the whole “pay to vote” scheme. He alleges that “the people that work for Ilhan” are actually counting the ballots, counting the vote. Speaker 1 adds that they “become a manager in the prison too,” claiming that those people “walk with you to the booth, and then they vote, oh, vote this guy. Vote this guy. Vote even if you speak English.” Speaker 0 introduces James O’Keefe, identifying himself as a truth exposer who holds the corrupt elite accountable, and pivots to messaging about protecting readers’ freedom and finances. The segment shifts to a financial pitch. O’Keefe warns of one of the biggest financial shifts of their lifetime, describing de-dollarization with nations like China, Russia, and Saudi Arabia moving away from US dollars. He claims this threatens savings and retirement security and cites Ray Dalio’s warning about skyrocketing debt, relentless money printing, and a weakening dollar as part of a dangerous cycle that could impact Americans. He asserts that more Americans are turning to real assets like physical gold and silver, noting that gold “surged past $3,700 per ounce,” and that momentum is building. He says he has partnered with veteran-owned American Independence Gold to help viewers take action, offering to open a qualifying account with up to $10,000 in bonus gold and a free gold protection guide. He adds that a portion of every sale supports Tunnel to Towers and wounded warriors, and closes with the line, “Freedom isn’t given, it’s secured,” followed by the disclaimer, “This is James O’Keefe. As always, this is not financial advice. Always check with your licensed financial advisor before you invest.”