TruthArchive.ai - Related Video Feed

County technical employees reported independently that the vote counts recorded by machines and stored on USB drives changed overnight after polls closed. Votes seemed to appear and disappear during this time. When we sought to verify the integrity of these voting machines, we were only permitted a superficial visual inspection of the USB drives and denied a forensic examination.

The speaker explains that a table was placed by a person at 8:22 am. Later, they witnessed four suitcases being taken out from under the table. The speaker questions why these separate ballots were only counted when the place was cleared out with no witnesses. They estimate that around 18,000 ballots could have been processed during the two hours when no one was present to supervise. The speaker mentions that the operation continued until around 12:55 am, and they have video evidence of people counting ballots after they were told to stop. The video concludes with the speaker asking if everyone has seen enough and fast-forwarding to 12:55 am.

Ballots were allegedly found under a table in a video presented. The person who placed the table there is said to be the same person who cleared the area and claimed to stop counting. Four suitcases were seen being taken out from under the table. These separate ballots were counted when there were no witnesses present. The machines used can process 3,000 ballots per hour, and they were running for 2 hours. This raises concerns about the number of ballots processed without supervision. The video continues until around 1 a.m., showing the ongoing operation. The speaker asks if everyone has seen enough and proceeds to fast forward to 12:55 a.m.

Clark County Technical employees independently found votes appearing and disappearing at night. They were only allowed a visual inspection of a USB drive, not a forensic examination.

In Gwinnett County, approximately 270 people went to a ballot box, but 1,862 ballots were deposited according to the custody document. After reviewing 24 hours of video footage, it was confirmed that 271 people approached the ballot box, but only 1,962 ballots were seen. The reason for this discrepancy is unknown. There were breakdowns in the process, and at the end of the day, two individuals were supposed to transfer the ballots into bags, but another person appeared and took the 1,962 ballots in two black duffle bags instead of the usual blue cooler. It is unclear who this person was. The supervision of this process falls under the responsibility of the secretary of state of Georgia. It was evident that nobody was intended to review these videos.

In the exchange, concerns are raised about mail-in ballots in Allegheny and Philadelphia counties and how they were counted. Speaker 0 notes that ballots were counted without observers, citing 682,770 ballots observed and asking about the 1,823,148 mailed-out ballots, contrasted with a final count showing 2,589,242 mail-in ballots. The core question is: what explains the roughly 700,000 mail-in ballots that “appeared from nowhere”? Speaker 1 responds that their cyber team uses white-hat hacking techniques to gather publicly available information from the secretary of state’s website, which has been updated as late as 11:16 this morning with provisional and mail-in ballots, though those numbers continue to change. He adds that the 2,500,000 figure is no longer on the website, and it has “just been taken off.” There is no annotation explaining why. Speaker 2 then describes an on-the-ground observation: a deputy sheriff, a senior law enforcement officer, was seen not being observed and walking in with baggies, with USBs being inserted into machines. The witness claims to have personally witnessed this 24 times, with additional witnesses including Democrat poll watchers. They were told by an attorney that every election leaves a couple of USB cards in the voting machines to be brought back by the warehouse manager, but this account is contradicted by law enforcement and other officials. The witness states that 47 USB cards are missing and “they’re nowhere to be found,” and that 32 to 30 cards uploaded were not present in the live vote update. The witness demanded timely live upload of vote results, which showed 50,000 votes; they assert those votes were for Vice President Biden, though they note that identifying who those votes were for should not matter to a computer scientist. Speaker 1 emphasizes that forensic evidence from the computers was not obtained: the procedure would involve turning off the computer, imaging the drive with BitLocker, under law enforcement observation, which would take about an hour for five machines. This forensic imaging was never performed, despite objections three weeks earlier. They later learned that virtually all chain-of-custody logs, yellow sheets, and forensic records in Delaware County were gone; a signing party attempted to recreate the logs with poll workers but was unsuccessful in recovering them all. The discussion concludes with a claim that there are 100,000 to 120,000 ballots, both mail-in and USB, in question, and that there is no remedy or “cure” within the local charter for certifying a presidential vote, leaving the speaker asserting that nobody could certify the vote in good conscience.

- Inside the TCF center, Speaker 0 recounts that local media said the events didn’t happen. Patty called on November 4 from inside the TCF, saying: “I just heard that a van dropped off boxes of ballots in the middle of the night,” and she was working there that morning. - They filed a request to obtain the video, which took months to acquire, and they obtained the footage described as a gateway (likely a video) about the incident. They shared the video on Twitter and their site, and as a result they later lost their Twitter account after posting it. - The video shows a lead escort car arriving. Each time, someone adds something to one side, and then the van drives in. The van is said to have entered twice. - Local media, including one of the top reporters, is quoted as saying that this never happened, that he was there all night, and there was no fraud.

The discussion centers on completing an audit of ballots to obtain a count and address concerns about the precinct. The participants emphasize that without counts, they cannot move forward. They insist that the audit piece must be completed first, not an investigation, so that a number of ballots can be established and the overall tally can proceed. Key points raised: - The need to finish the audit to determine how many ballots are in the ballot can, and to move forward with the numbers. “We need to move forward with the audit so we can get the numbers, so we can see how many ballots are here.” - A concern has been raised about the precinct, including the issue of multiple ballots with the very same signature. The team discusses handling this by counting the ballots and later addressing the concern, rather than delaying the process. “we will separate out and count those and add those in. We're there going to be an asterisk saying these ballots have the same.” - There is tension between continuing the presidential race audit and addressing potential irregularities. The instruction given is to complete the audit portion first and then review any issues. “the process right now is for you to put them in the piles where they belong and for the presidential vote and count the presidential votes… finish the presidential race audit, not separate them out, and then we'll move forward from there.” - The officials acknowledge the underlying concern about the precinct and previous issues with county ballots, but reiterate that, at this moment, the priority is to obtain a count and finish the audit. “We understand that there may be possibly an issue with this precinct. We understand that. But what I need for you to do right now is to finish the audit process.” - They clarify that the current activity is not an investigation, and that the aim is to produce a number for how many ballots were in the can when counting began, enabling progress based on the audit results. “This is not an investigation right now… not an investigation, not counting… what I need you to do is complete the audit so we can get a number.” In sum, the participants are focused on completing the ballot-count audit to establish a definitive tally, while acknowledging concerns about signatures and precinct irregularities, and planning to address those concerns after the audit yields a numeric result for the presidential ballots. The priority repeatedly stated is to finish the audit to obtain a count, then proceed with any further review.

In this video, footage analyzed by Gateway Pundit reveals suspicious activity during the ballot counting process. Poll workers, including Ruby Freeman and her daughter Wondreya Moss, were caught on camera scanning the same stack of ballots multiple times after GOP observers and reporters had left the room. They continued counting uninterrupted for over 3 hours. It is highly illegal to scan the same batch of ballots repeatedly, and this was all captured on tape. Georgia officials have dismissed the evidence, but no explanation has been given for Freeman's actions or why they remained behind while the building was evacuated. Lawyers find it unusual to store briefcases full of ballots under tablecloths, and it is unclear when they were delivered or why they were retrieved after the GOP observers left. Experts suggest that this activity could explain the sudden increase in votes for Joe Biden.

The investigation confirms missing ballot images - 380,761 from election day not available. Subpoenaed 518,000 ballot images from Fulton County for recount, not election day. Fulton County does not have images for 380,761 election day ballots. County does not know why. Should every vote have a ballot image?

In Gwinnett County, there was a ballot drop box with a chain of custody document noting 1,962 ballots. This is unusual as we usually see around 10 times fewer. After analyzing the GEO data, we found that only 271 people approached the drop box during a 25-hour period. This raises questions about how 1,962 ballots were deposited. Video evidence shows election officials removing two full duffle bags containing the ballots from the drop box.

The investigation confirms that there are missing ballot images. Specifically, 380,761 ballot images from the election day machine count are not available. We subpoenaed Fulton County for all ballot images and received about 518,000, but these pertain to the recount, not the election day count. Thus, the missing images are a result of the focus on the recount rather than the original election day data.

- The discussion centers on ballot processing in Maricopa County, with several shipments arriving after the initial belief that counting was near completion. Speaker 0 notes that the Wednesday before the Friday they quit voting, and ten days before they quit tabulating, more truckloads of ballots came in, leading to the question: “how can you not know how many ballots are still out there?” - Speaker 1 asks for clarification: “They thought they were done.” The conversation confirms multiple times that those running the counting rooms believed they were almost done, or would be done, on Wednesday morning, then Thursday morning, then Friday morning, and the process extended into the next week. - Trucks bringing ballots arrived on the third, fourth, and fifth days, continuing throughout the last week. The last day mentioned is the tenth, with ballots still arriving. The company involved is Runback, described as doing high-speed scanning and printing of duplications and military ballots. There was no observer presence at Runback, and Speaker 0 indicates she had not been called to work there; she does not know exactly what Runback was doing (printing vs. scanning). - It is stated that all high-speed scanning occurs at Runback, and the ballots go to Runback. There is uncertainty about off-site scanning and whether Dominion equipment was involved. Speaker 0 clarifies: “They were duplications, the ballots that wouldn’t read through the tabulation machines. They were ballots that came in from military and overseas.” The number of additional sources for ballots beyond military/overseas is unknown, and Speaker 0 suggests this is a question for county employees to explain. - About the counting process: Speaker 0 confirms that the ballots went through tabulation machines and that adjudication work took place for those late arrivals. They observed the ballots being processed, but did not know the exact totals for certain days. - Daily volumes are described. Speaker 0 estimates: one day a shift might handle 90,000 ballots, and some days had similar volumes across three shifts; other days had fewer. There were days when as few as 15,000 ballots were processed. The “back door” arrivals are contrasted with the front door, with Speaker 0 noting that all back door ballots were received through back entries, not the front door. The remaining ballots in the latter part of the period continued to come in and be tabulated, with ongoing full-time shifts through the eighth, ninth, and tenth days. - The episode concludes with Speaker 1 seeking further explanation, and Speaker 0 indicating that some of the details were not fully known and that a county employee should clarify where the incoming ballots came from during the latter part of the period.

At around 8:22 AM, a person placed a black table in the room. Later, when the place was cleared out, four suitcases were taken out from under the table. The question is why these separate ballots were only counted when there were no witnesses present. The machines can process 3,000 ballots per hour, and they were there for two hours. If three scanners were working, that's 18,000 ballots. There were six people involved, and the operation continued until around 12:55 AM. The video shows the people who provided affidavits appearing at that time to check if counting was still happening. If you've seen enough, we can fast forward to 12:55 AM.

Inside the TCF center, Patty witnessed a band dropping off boxes of ballots in the middle of the night. After months of waiting, Gateway Point obtained the video and shared it on their site and Twitter. However, they lost their CLEAR account as a result. The video shows a lead car and an escort car arriving multiple times, adding something to the people inside. The van entered the center twice. Despite a top reporter denying any fraud or incidents, this video provides evidence to the contrary.

A lady with blonde braids placed a table at 8:22 AM. The same person who cleared the place out under the pretense of stopping the count also put the table there. Four suitcases came out from underneath the table. A man in red pulled one of the suitcases out. The question is, why are these ballots separate from the others, and why are they only counting them when the place is cleared out with no witnesses? The machines can process about 3,000 ballots an hour, and there were multiple machines for two hours. The question is, how many ballots went through those machines in those two hours when no one was there to supervise, consistent with statutes and rules?

On October 11th, from 7:30 AM to October 12th, approximately 270 people accessed a ballot box in Gwinnett County, but 1,962 ballots were recorded as deposited. Reviewing 24 hours of video confirmed the 271 individuals, but the number of ballots did not match. There’s uncertainty about the discrepancy. On that day, two individuals were responsible for transferring the ballots, but an unidentified person appeared, took the ballots from two black duffel bags, and left without following the usual protocol of using a cooler. The oversight of this process is questionable, as it seems no one intended for the videos to be scrutinized.

County technical employees reported independently that the vote counts recorded by machines and stored on USB drives changed between the closing of polls and their reopening the next morning. Votes appeared and disappeared overnight. Attempts to verify the integrity of these voting machines were limited to a superficial visual inspection of the USB drives, and a forensic examination was denied.

The speakers discuss the flow of ballots and the involvement of a company called Runback. Trucks delivering ballots arrived on the third, then the fourth, and the fifth, continuing for days. The last day of the speaker’s involvement was the tenth, and trucks were still coming in. The ballots were coming from Runback, a company that does high‑speed scanning and printing of duplications, and the speaker mentions military ballots being produced or processed by Runback, though there is uncertainty about exactly what Runback was doing. When asked whether the ballots were printed or scanned off-site, the speaker is unsure. It is stated that all the high‑speed scanning occurs at Runback, and that those ballots go to Runback. There were no observers at Runback, and the speaker had not been called to work there. The question is raised about whether the scanning was done on-site at the Maricopa County structure, but the response indicates that scanning was not on-site and occurred at Runback where there are very high‑speed scanners. The question of whether Dominion equipment was involved is addressed: the ballots being scanned were not related to Dominion. The purpose of scanning the ballots in advance of tabulation on Dominion equipment is then explained: they were duplications of ballots that would not read through the tabulation machines, specifically ballots that came in from military and overseas. However, the speaker notes there were more ballots than just those, with trays of ballots being brought in, and uncertainty remains about where the rest were coming from. The speaker suggests that the remaining questions about the sources of these ballots should be answered by the county employees. In summary, the discussion centers on: a sequence of ballot deliveries over several days; Runback handling high‑speed scanning and duplications off-site; uncertainty about whether ballots were printed or scanned and by whom; the absence of observers at Runback; scanners used were not Dominion; the purpose of off-site scanning was to duplicate ballots that wouldn’t read through the tabulation machines, including military and overseas ballots; and unresolved questions about the origin of additional ballots, which require explanation from county staff. The exchange ends with a note that the remaining questions about the ballots’ origins are for the county employees to explain.

- The evidence, through eyewitness testimony corroborated by others, shows that a 130,000 to 280,000 completed ballots for the twenty twenty general election were shipped from Bethpage, New York to Lancaster, Pennsylvania, where those ballots and the trailer in which they were shipped disappeared. - On October 21, there was a series of unusual events that cannot be a coincidence. I know I saw ballots with return addresses filled out, thousands of them, thousands, loaded onto my trailer in New York and headed for Pennsylvania. At first, I didn't think it was a big deal. In fact, I thought it was really awesome. I was like, sweet. I'm doing something for the presidential race. You know? This is cool. But as things became weirder, I got to thinking and wondered why I was driving complete ballots from New York to Pennsylvania. I didn't know why, so I decided to speak up. And that's what I'm doing today. - It could be a 144 to over, to a quarter million ballots. Part of our developing investigation indicates that Jesse wasn't alone. There was a number, as in like a bunch of different trucks which engaged in this. So when you think about the magnitude of potential votes showing up the night of the election after midnight, you have to have an artifact. So if you eliminate the impossible with all things being equal, whatever remains must be the truth. The truth is ballot showed up. They were counted. They do not match necessarily the records of who should have voted. In some instances, the stats don't add up, and we continue to analyze that. - With that said, I believe beyond a shadow of a doubt, we have evidence of a massive transfer of completed curated ballots ready to be injected into counting centers.

I want to find missing documents for proper vote counting in Fulton County. We couldn't find ballot images but have the ballots. Someone is preventing access to paper ballots. I'm focused on data and numbers.

There is a discussion about log files on two screens. One screen shows hundreds of log files from 2019 until May 22, 2021. The other screen only has three years of log files, which have mysteriously disappeared. It is mentioned that when a Dominion employee came in, the log files vanished. These files record all access to a specific machine. It is also mentioned that Dominion sent people around the country for software updates during that time. Some participants confirm this information.

In the video, the speaker discusses the issue of 17,852 ballots that lack corresponding ballot images. This is a significant number, and while the speaker can explain the number, they cannot explain how this situation occurred. They mention that they hope to receive more information about it on Tuesday. The ballots were counted in the second machine count, but there is no associated ballot image for each of them.

There are two different batches of votes being discussed in the video. The speaker points out that there are similarities between the ballots in these batches, such as a little tail and the word "Republican" written on them. They mention that there are a total of 62 images in the batch, but they didn't have time to go through all of them. The speaker doesn't remember the exact numbers of the batches, but they mention that duplicate ballots were scanned multiple times.

We asked Fulton County for all ballot images, but only received about 518,000 for the recount, not the 380,761 from election day. The focus was on the recount, not the original election. It's unclear why the election day images are missing. Shouldn't every vote have a valid image?