TruthArchive.ai - Related Video Feed

In this video, the speaker discusses a recent report about voter fraud in Michigan. In October 2020, several women brought in 8,000 to 10,000 voter registrations to the city clerk's office. The registrations had the same handwriting, raising red flags. The state police were contacted and an investigation began. The police raided the offices of the women involved and found weapons, cash cards, and burner phones. The organization responsible for the registrations, GBI Strategies, is linked to other Democrat organizations and had offices in other swing states. The speaker believes that bloated voter rolls are necessary for cheating and stealing in elections. The speaker also mentions the importance of phony registrations as a predicate for mail-in ballot fraud. The police are concerned about the large number of registrations being dropped off.

Engineers analyzed benefit programs and voter rolls, finding 1.3 million individuals on Medicaid. Thousands registered to vote in multiple states, and some voted, which is a federal crime. This was discovered in a few states and is considered the "tip of the iceberg." The analysis revealed individuals receiving benefits like Medicaid and unemployment, suggesting they are not contributing to the system. Data sent to the National Targeting Center showed "hard hits," including criminals and individuals on terrorist watch lists within this group. The speaker acknowledges that some individuals may also be employed and paying taxes. The organization is currently analyzing the data to determine how to address the situation.

The speaker obtained a video showing a suspicious drop-off of ballots at a Detroit facility. Local media denied any fraud, but the video contradicts this. The escort car delivering the ballots had a Pennsylvania license plate, raising questions about its origin. A Michigan group counted only 1,400 drop box ballots, yet officials claimed to have received 16,000 ballots after hours. The discrepancy in numbers has sparked concerns about the legitimacy of the additional ballots brought in.

In the exchange, concerns are raised about mail-in ballots in Allegheny and Philadelphia counties and how they were counted. Speaker 0 notes that ballots were counted without observers, citing 682,770 ballots observed and asking about the 1,823,148 mailed-out ballots, contrasted with a final count showing 2,589,242 mail-in ballots. The core question is: what explains the roughly 700,000 mail-in ballots that “appeared from nowhere”? Speaker 1 responds that their cyber team uses white-hat hacking techniques to gather publicly available information from the secretary of state’s website, which has been updated as late as 11:16 this morning with provisional and mail-in ballots, though those numbers continue to change. He adds that the 2,500,000 figure is no longer on the website, and it has “just been taken off.” There is no annotation explaining why. Speaker 2 then describes an on-the-ground observation: a deputy sheriff, a senior law enforcement officer, was seen not being observed and walking in with baggies, with USBs being inserted into machines. The witness claims to have personally witnessed this 24 times, with additional witnesses including Democrat poll watchers. They were told by an attorney that every election leaves a couple of USB cards in the voting machines to be brought back by the warehouse manager, but this account is contradicted by law enforcement and other officials. The witness states that 47 USB cards are missing and “they’re nowhere to be found,” and that 32 to 30 cards uploaded were not present in the live vote update. The witness demanded timely live upload of vote results, which showed 50,000 votes; they assert those votes were for Vice President Biden, though they note that identifying who those votes were for should not matter to a computer scientist. Speaker 1 emphasizes that forensic evidence from the computers was not obtained: the procedure would involve turning off the computer, imaging the drive with BitLocker, under law enforcement observation, which would take about an hour for five machines. This forensic imaging was never performed, despite objections three weeks earlier. They later learned that virtually all chain-of-custody logs, yellow sheets, and forensic records in Delaware County were gone; a signing party attempted to recreate the logs with poll workers but was unsuccessful in recovering them all. The discussion concludes with a claim that there are 100,000 to 120,000 ballots, both mail-in and USB, in question, and that there is no remedy or “cure” within the local charter for certifying a presidential vote, leaving the speaker asserting that nobody could certify the vote in good conscience.

There were multiple improbable factors that would have had to align for these bombs to be discovered at the same time on a sidewalk, prompting questions about a broader conspiracy and how such a scenario could unfold. The speakers emphasize that while they want to avoid a conspiracy path, there are many questions still open, including the handling of video footage. Regarding video records, one speaker notes that they want to review January 6 video to see if anyone returned to the locations, but that video apparently does not exist anymore. They do have January 5 video, but have been told that no one preserved January 6. This raises eyebrows as they consider whether the devices were placed by an inexperienced person who was trying to set them down quickly or whether the devices were left to be found. Mrs. Younger’s account is highlighted: she walked out her back door and did not see anything earlier in the morning, but saw the devices later, which would give a reason to believe she would have noticed them if they had been there in the morning. This observation is part of why they want to talk to her. One speaker is blown away by a point: according to the FBI, the FBI’s internal data indicate 39,000 videos showing the hoodie-clad pipe bomber—referred to as the C. Virkel bomber—movements that night, from various camera angles. Washington, DC, Capitol Hill is described as among the most surveilled areas in the world. Yet there is a claim that there is no footage from January 6 of the actual areas a person would have had to travel to place the pipe bombs. The other speaker confirms that there are cameras along some Capitol Police lines that show walking paths, including footage from Capitol Police cameras, but the angles that would show positions behind the RNC and behind the DNC do not exist today, at least not in a way that captures the relevant movements. This absence has limited the investigation into the theory that the devices could have been placed earlier and then moved or re-placed. They are now going back through Capitol Police footage, including from the Fairchild Building near the DNC, which has provided the most evidence so far. The team is reviewing hours from about 8 PM on May 5 to 1 PM on January 6 to determine whether anyone else passed by, whether there was any suspicious activity, and whether the devices were moved again. The investigators are evaluating step-by-step explanations for these anomalies, considering whether the Secret Service dog failed to detect one device or whether Mrs. Younger missed the other, whether the devices were not present at that time, or whether weather and other factors affected detections. They acknowledge that with so many circumstances, some “smoke” might indicate “fire.” They hope the FBI is reviewing cell phone data to determine if the suspected bomber returned or if a co-conspirator was involved in setting timers or re-placing devices. The transcript ends with an acknowledgment of ongoing investigation scope and questions.

Unobserved ballots in Allegheny County and Philadelphia raised questions about 700,000 mail-in ballots. A cyber team used public data from the Secretary of State's website, which was updated regularly. The 2.5 million ballot count post-election is now missing from the site without explanation.

In Gwinnett County, there was a ballot drop box with a chain of custody document noting 1,962 ballots. This is unusual as we usually see around 10 times fewer. After analyzing the GEO data, we found that only 271 people approached the drop box during a 25-hour period. This raises questions about how 1,962 ballots were deposited. Video evidence shows election officials removing two full duffle bags containing the ballots from the drop box.

We received information from various sources, including whistleblowers and individuals with knowledge of the situation. This allowed us to identify the organizations and stash houses involved. In Philadelphia, we observed people going in and out of drop boxes multiple times, with some individuals visiting over 50 times and others over 100 times. Additionally, these individuals were also visiting the organizations connected to the drop boxes. This created a hub and spoke model, similar to airports like Chicago O'Hare, with multiple hubs in Atlanta, specifically 10 of them.

42,000 people in Nevada voted more than once, 1,500 were deceased, 19,000 didn't live in Nevada or attend college, 8,000 voted from non-existent addresses, 15,000 were registered at vacant addresses, and 4,000 were noncitizens. The speaker questions if any prosecutions are happening in Nevada for the 130,000 instances of voter fraud identified in the 2020 election. No prosecutions have been reported yet.

42,000 people in Nevada voted more than once, 1,500 were deceased, 19,000 didn't live in Nevada or attend college, 8,000 voted from a non-existent address, 15,000 were registered to vacant addresses, and 4,000 were noncitizens. The speaker asks if there are any ongoing prosecutions for voter fraud in Nevada, given the 130,000 instances identified in the 2020 election. The response is that there are currently no prosecutions.

The speaker describes "a massive scandal in Washington DC with the doctoring of crime stats," noting that "the Department of Justice under the attorney general is leading the effort to uncover this." "But when we ultimately share the results, results, it will it will stun you." They state that "the extent to which even though DC had the worst crime in America, honestly measured, it dramatically understated how bad it was," and claim "There's even accusations that murders and homicides were reported as accidents instead of murders." "I mean, this is how severe the manipulation of the crime data has been in this city." "And it will all be uncovered, it will all be brought to light." The speaker adds: "I've had a chance to spend some time, as to everyone here, with the police officers in the city." "Members of the public are going up to them and thanking them, just overflowing with gratitude."

In Downtown Detroit at the TCF Center, a video discussion describes what a caller says happened during ballot processing. The account asserts that after precincts had counted ballots and were ready to close, three vehicles—a van, a Chrysler 300, and a Ferrari—arrived at about 4:00 a.m. with a claimed 130,000 ballots. The claim is that every one of these ballots were Biden ballots that had not been delivered to the precinct before its cutoff, constituting a “big irregularity” and suggesting voter fraud. The speakers say this is being contested by the president in a lawsuit for Michigan, with people who allegedly witnessed the event. Speaker 1 adds that back rooms at the facility enabled cars to drive in through a garage door, and that ballots appeared between 10:30 p.m. and 3:30 a.m. Approximately 38,000 ballots were said to have arrived in that window, with a reported count of 61 ballots described as being in USPS boxes. The boxes were not necessarily USPS-delivered; a white van with the city clerk’s emblem appeared to be delivering them, bearing the name Janice Winfrey and related tagline. The implication is that ballots arrived in an unverified, potentially improper manner. Speaker 2 notes possible additional vehicles present at the time and mentions that a mini panel truck with Detroit Elections Bureau regalia and a vehicle ID number was observed, with other people recording license plate information. The lack of verifiable chain of custody is emphasized: there was no confirmed Republican/Democrat presence during transfer, and seals on ballots were not verified. The speaker contrasts this with a suburbs experience where ballots were methodically processed, sealed, and tracked, implying Detroit’s process lacked similar controls. Speaker 3 explains that Gateway Pundit obtained video of the event after a delay, and that local media personnel claimed the event did not occur. The video shows an escort car and a lead car delivering items inside the facility, with the escort car reportedly from Pennsylvania and possibly a rental. The Michigan group, Patty’s group, counted drop-box ballots and reported about 1,340 to 1,400 ballots dropped in Detroit over the last two days. In contrast, after the shutdown, officials allegedly claimed 16,000 ballots were dropped in, with the question of where those additional ballots originated. Speaker 4 reinforces the Michigan group’s tally of roughly 1,340–1,400 ballots from drop boxes in Detroit in the adjacent period and points to the discrepancy between that count and the 16,000 ballots later cited, noting the eight-hour gap after the official closing time and the two separate deliveries to the TCF Center. The overarching claim is that these events indicate irregularities in ballot handling and raise questions about the source and legitimacy of the large ballot influx.

Inside the TCF center, Patty witnessed a band dropping off boxes of ballots in the middle of the night. After months of waiting, Gateway Point obtained the video and shared it on their site and Twitter. However, they lost their CLEAR account as a result. The video shows a lead car and an escort car arriving multiple times, adding something to the people inside. The van entered the center twice. Despite a top reporter denying any fraud or incidents, this video provides evidence to the contrary.

Speaker 0 reports on data gathered from red states to understand program integrity and fraud patterns. The findings include 200,000 dead people or individuals using dead people’s Social Security numbers. Additionally, half a million people are receiving benefits at more than twice the amount they should be receiving. The data also shows a case of a single individual receiving benefits in five states. Speaker 0 notes that these are results from the red states, which typically have smaller programs and tighter accountability and control. Speaker 0 contrasts this with blue states, which sued and are in ongoing litigation; these states do not want California or New York to turn over data to help root out fraud. The Minnesota aspect of the situation is described as remarkable and has been a focus of coverage. The overall message is that legal action is underway, and the speaker emphasizes a commitment to public funds and to the people who actually need these programs. The team intends to remain in court and work hard to ensure the protection of the American taxpayer and the beneficiaries of the programs.

A Georgia drop box averaged 60,000 ballots a day. Over Columbus Day weekend, 19,000 votes were counted from that drop box. However, surveillance showed only 24 people visited the drop box. This discrepancy suggests potential illegal ballot harvesting in Georgia.

In the discussion, it was noted that the red states provided their data to help determine what the landscape looks like. The results highlighted several issues: 200,000 dead people or people using dead people's Social Security numbers were identified, and half a million individuals were found to be receiving more than twice what they should be getting in benefits. Additionally, there was a case of one person receiving benefits in five states. The speaker emphasized that these findings come from the red states. The speaker then contrasted this with the blue states, explaining that the blue states sued, and that there is active litigation because they do not want California and New York to turn their data over in order to help root out fraud. This contrast underscores the ongoing friction between states over sharing data to combat misuse. A specific point was also made about Minnesota, described as remarkable in the context of the broader discussion and investigations. Given these circumstances, the speaker stated that they are in court and will work really hard to ensure they are protecting the American taxpayer and the people who actually need these programs. The overarching aim conveyed is to root out fraud within the programs by leveraging data from states, despite legal challenges and opposition from some states.

The speaker references a DOJ law enforcement map called the red dot map, where every red dot represents at least one unique IP address of individuals downloading, sharing, or distributing child abuse images involving children under 12. There are over 111,000 such IPs in the United States in the last 30 days. The problem is not limited to gangs or international networks; families are also involved, and the issue is present in the speaker’s own backyard, not just overseas. The speaker shares alarming anecdotes to illustrate the cruelty of the abuse. One story describes a 13-year-old girl who is abused while someone reads the Bible to her, with the Bible read in rotation by different people during the abuse, in an attempt to connect the worst moment of her life with God's word. Another anecdote, cited by a psychologist friend, concerns an offender who stood at a playground watching boys and girls, selected a child, and explained that he chose that child to steal her soul—an emphasis on premeditated targeting of a child’s happiness and vulnerability. The speaker stresses a belief that God has created some people to stand in the gap between abusers and victims, so victims would know that some people love them and that God loves them. The speaker asserts a call to rally people to form an army, possibly declare a national emergency, and leverage all resources to help victims escape this evil. The overarching message is that the issues are growing and that progress is not being made; the speaker contends that “we aren’t winning” and that “we’re losing every day until enough people stand on the line” to fight the evil, declare it, and defend the vulnerable. The message culminates in a moral exhortation: those victims are worth fighting for, as they were worth it to King Jesus to die for, and therefore-worthy of collective action to stand against the abuse and protect children.

At a voting center late at night, officials told everyone to stop counting and go home, but four people stayed behind. They took out four boxes of ballots from under a table and continued scanning them throughout the night. This video, described as the "smoking gun" by Rudy Giuliani, confirms previous testimonies from credible witnesses who witnessed irregular activities and violations of the law in six states. It is difficult for anyone honest to deny the evidence and claim that the election was conducted fairly.

The speaker observes a dropbox location with people waiting in line. The speaker identifies a person, referred to as "our mule," approaching the dropbox. The speaker claims this person committed a felony by depositing multiple ballots. The speaker states that after the first ballot, each subsequent ballot constitutes a felony, and alleges there were three felonies committed at one dropbox. The speaker emphasizes this occurred in broad daylight while others watched. The speaker suggests obtaining the license plate information. The speaker concludes that the person violated Georgia law in broad daylight.

A senior law enforcement officer witnessed unauthorized individuals inserting USBs into voting machines multiple times. Despite demands for forensic evidence collection, no action was taken. Chain of custody logs and records in Delaware County are missing, leaving 100,000-120,000 ballots in question with no remedy available. The speaker believes certifying the vote would be unconscionable. Translation: A senior law enforcement officer saw unauthorized people inserting USBs into voting machines multiple times. Despite requests for forensic evidence collection, no action was taken. Chain of custody logs and records in Delaware County are missing, leaving 100,000-120,000 ballots in question with no solution available. The speaker believes certifying the vote would be unethical.

The video shows a postal worker making four stops at a drop box within an hour, which seemed suspicious. She used a private vehicle and deposited a large stack of ballots on her fourth visit. This behavior was unusual compared to other post office workers.

In this video, we see a group of people waiting in line at a drop box. There is a woman wearing a maroon dress who seems to be causing some confusion. It turns out she is trying to open the drop box but can't because it's full. This is considered a felony after the first person has used it. So, she becomes a felon along with two others who also violated the law. It's concerning that this happened in broad daylight with everyone watching. It's possible to gather information like license plate numbers in situations like this.

Over the last 30 days, every red dot on a map represents at least one unique IP address of individuals downloading, sharing, and distributing child abuse and rape images under the age of 12, with over 11,000 in the US alone. It is claimed that 55 to 85% of these individuals are also hands-on offenders, with an average of 13 victims in their lifetime. Over 3,000 of 50,000 unknown child victims were infants or toddlers. The speaker asserts that the US is the number one payer of livestreamed rape of boys and girls around the world, and ranks third in peer-to-peer sharing, behind China and Russia.

The speaker explains that every red dot on the maps is a unique IP address that is downloaded, shared, or distributing child rape images, almost all under the age of 12. In a six-month screenshot there are over 338,000 red dots. Blue dots, which are under investigation, are visible but not prominent in a sea of red. The speaker asks, “Isn't that a problem of what we're talking about?”

Speaker 0 presents a video focused on data and evidence of alleged irregularities in the 2020 election, asserting that there has been no comprehensive place to see widespread fraud until now. He states the video is “pure data” and invites viewers to consider the statistical anomalies in three states (Michigan, Wisconsin, Georgia) in the early hours of 11/04/2020, when Biden received major vote spikes after trailing Trump. - He analyzes 8,954 individual vote updates and identifies a clear statistical pattern across nearly all updates, with four notably aberrant updates: two in Michigan, one in Wisconsin, and one in Georgia, all occurring in the same five-hour window in the middle of the night when counting reportedly stopped in some places. - In Michigan, a 06:30AM update shows Biden at 141,258 votes to Trump’s 5,968, described as the most extreme update in all datasets across all states, followed by a noticeable ratio change in nearby updates. In Wisconsin, a single update allegedly moved Biden from trailing by over 100,000 votes into the lead. In Georgia, a 01:34AM Eastern Time update shows Biden at 136,155 to Trump’s 29,115. They claim these four spikes exceed the states’ margins of victory, making the spikes not only abnormal by percentage but also by magnitude. They conclude that if these four unlikely updates had not happened, the presidency could have been different. - Detractors are cited as arguing human error, but the video questions where evidence of corrections is, and notes that California shows only one anomalous update in percentage, not enough magnitude to shift outcomes. - A “consistently identical ratio of Biden to Trump votes across time” is highlighted as allegedly impossible, with a Florida example showing 100 identical ratios over several days. The video asserts a computer algorithm is involved, termed a weighted race distribution, associated with Diebold voting machines (known as early as 2001), implying values rather than simple counts. - In California, a single update is shown with Biden receiving about 65% and Trump 32% for one vote, raising questions about how one vote could go to more than one candidate. Speaker 0 then links these patterns to alleged connections between Diebold and Dominion Voting Systems, claiming Dominion acquired ESNS in 2010, which had previously acquired Diebold, and that Dominion’s software is licensed from Smartmatic. They also note that forensic audits show errors and that the mainstream narrative claims these issues are misinformation. They reference NBC News and PBS findings on how easy it is to hack voting machines or cast fake votes. Next, Speaker 0 notes eyewitness and video evidence from Georgia: poll worker Ruby allegedly was filmed in the backroom with absentee ballots, and at 10:30PM on November 3, media and poll watchers were told to leave, yet Ruby and others remained, pulling ballots from under a table and distributing them to counting stations. They describe Ruby running the same stack of ballots to the machine three times, observing a large Biden surge after 01:34AM Georgia time, and question whether a ballot can be counted more than once, citing Coffey County, Georgia as an example of someone claiming to scan the same batches repeatedly. Speaker 0 references Raquel Rodriguez, arrested for election fraud in Texas over video evidence of ballot harvesting, and asserts that cybersecurity evidence indicates Dominion and Edison Research used an unencrypted VPN with easily accessible credentials allowing foreign access, asserting that China, Iran, and other countries accessed the servers, contradicting claims that Dominion machines were not connected to the Internet. They mention Dominion’s association with a Chinese-registered domain, and board members with Chinese nationality, alleging conflicts of interest through corporate ownership and licensing from Smartmatic. Speaker 0 highlights that Antrim County, Michigan audits found high error and adjudication rates in Dominion, with an 68 o 5% error rate far above federal guidelines, missing logs for 2020, and reprogramming of election event designer cards during the safe harbor period. They point to subpoenas and the lack of access to logs, and to affidavits from poll workers claiming illegal activities, non-equal treatment of observers, counting without proper oversight, shredding ballots, and other irregularities. Speaker 7 concludes with a claim that many Americans distrust the 2020 election and urges viewers to download and share the video, demand election reform, and notes that the video’s credits will continue with data readers, while warning of erasure or fact checks by tech platforms.