TruthArchive.ai - Related Video Feed

During the discussion, Speaker 1 mentions an interesting observation regarding the voter rolls. They found that 11,326 individuals who were not listed on the November 7th version of the voter rolls appeared on the December 4th version, despite showing as having voted in the recent election. Speaker 0 seeks an explanation for this discrepancy, emphasizing that they are not implying fraud but simply seeking answers. Speaker 1 admits they cannot think of a logical explanation and suggests reaching out to the county for clarification. The conversation ends there.

The speaker describes finding a pattern of voter registrations from a single location. Specifically, they note that more than a thousand people were registered from 201 Washington Street Southwest, which they identify as a church. Upon further investigation, they claim this was part of a well-organized plan by Democrat donors, including George Soros, who allegedly poured millions into an Atlanta organization that went around this area and signed up all the homeless people. The speaker asserts this occurred during the day, when the area is typically filled with homeless individuals, and states that the organization receives money from people like George Soros to register homeless people to be able to vote from one single place. The speaker also points to another location across the Georgia state capital, stating that 48 Martin Luther King Jr Drive Southwest has registered over 2,000 people to vote from one single location. They identify the sign-ups as being conducted by the progressive organization, which they claim is signing up homeless people who are located right across the street. The speaker emphasizes the cold weather, noting it is 35 degrees at 1 PM, and reiterates that the area is normally filled with homeless people. In summary, the speaker asserts that megachurches and surrounding locations have seen extensive, single-location voter registrations, alleging deliberate campaigns funded by Soros-adjacent groups to register homeless individuals to vote from these sites. The locations highlighted include 201 Washington Street Southwest and 48 Martin Luther King Junior Drive Southwest, both described as heavily involved in large-scale registrations from single sites, with the latter attributed to a progressive organization and the former to a group described as aiding Democrats through homeless-voter registration.

Multiple individuals have allegedly registered to vote illegally using the speaker's home address. The speaker believes this constitutes election fraud in a crucial election. Missouri Republicans are accused of inaction regarding election integrity, implying corruption. The speaker claims Republicans had ample time to eliminate corrupt voting machines and prevent election cheating but failed to do so. Despite this, the speaker hopes the election's scale will prevent rigging.

The speakers tour sites in Atlanta that they say show problems with voter registration and housing. They point to 477 P Street Northeast, where they state that, according to Georgia registration rolls updated less than two weeks ago, over 70 people are actively registered to vote from that location, even though the Peachtree Pine homeless shelter behind them was closed in 2017. They question why those former residents remain on the rolls and propose that there should be automatic purges when a shelter closes. They note the property is private, boarded up, with danger and no trespassing signs, and they attempt to enter entrances but are blocked. They compare the 70-some registrations at that site to the expectation that USPS would drop off mail or voter information for residents, and they express skepticism about how such registrations could occur. They also highlight a UPS store at 2625 Piedmont Road Northeast, where they say 96 people are still registered to vote from that address, again asserting this is a violation of Georgia law because a UPS store, PO box, or virtual mailbox cannot be a place of residence. They say the law specifies that where you vote from is where you live and rest, and they emphasize that this is a clear violation. The discussion shifts to the idea that, in addition to homelessness and voting, welfare fraud could be connected to these registrations. They claim that some churches act with advocacy groups to sign up homeless people for benefits and that this could involve checks sent to addresses used for registration. They allege that an outreach program at services and mail lines at a neighboring center, the central outreach and advocacy center, handles housing needs and mail for thousands of people. They report that the organization took in almost $700,000, with a government grant of $25,000 for homeless activities and a private contractor paid $50,000 to write grant proposals to the government, implying that the county maintains a surplus in election budgets and disperses funds to such groups. The speakers assert that the county is not cleaning voter rolls, thereby inflating the number of registered voters. They speculate that if there were many such sites—perhaps hundreds—with around 100 voters each, it would be easy to influence elections, noting that Georgia uses voter ID while contrasting with states like California. They also reference the 2020 election, suggesting that in Georgia, the state was won by a narrow margin and that widespread irregularities in Fulton County could have impacted the result. They discuss potential political leanings, claiming that donations and grants to these groups likely go to Democrats, and that the same organizations could be targeting homeless people to register them to vote and to receive government assistance. The presenters visit another church area at 201 Washington Street Southwest, identifying two lines: one for services and one for mail, implying that the church’s outreach program is involved in registering people for voting and distributing mail to many individuals. They reiterate their belief that the operation is funded by state and federal grants and private donations, and they reiterate that the aggregate registrations at two churches total over a thousand. They propose a broader pattern of “targeting” vulnerable populations for political and financial gain, suggesting potential corruption and kickbacks linked to government funds and political support. They conclude with a strong assertion that the described situation constitutes corruption.

According to the speaker, there is common knowledge that 15,000 deceased individuals have voted in the election. They claim that people have been using death registers to obtain Social Security numbers and then submitting them as mail-in ballots to check if their votes were counted. Allegedly, 15,000 deceased individuals, including those born in 18/90, have voted for Joe Biden. The speaker believes that the entire process is rigged to ensure Biden's victory through mail-in ballots.

Speaker 1 is asked about their previous tweets regarding Trump and Brian Kemp stealing elections. Speaker 1 dismisses the comparison as ridiculous and clarifies that they were referring to the threat to voting rights at that time.

Speaker 0 cautions that what you’re doing is extremely dangerous. Speaker 1 asks why it’s dangerous and replies that it’s not a conspiracy theory, and questions whether the person has $45. Speaker 1 emphasizes they are not saying people are voting there, but that people are currently registered to vote there. They state they went around Fulton County in the last few weeks and found that people are currently registered to vote in places like empty lots and homeless shelters that closed ten years ago. Speaker 1 asks what would you do if you become secretary of state to address that. Speaker 0 responds by saying they will reply to conspiracy theories. Speaker 1 reiterates that it’s not a conspiracy theory, and argues that there is a current act of voter rolls: “It’s a current you can currently go on the voter rolls, purchase them for $45, and go there with us.” They offer to take the other person to verify claims. Speaker 0 pushes back, saying they won’t respond to conspiracy theories. Speaker 1 asks how it’s a conspiracy theory, labeling it an act of voter rolls. Speaker 0 says, “If you're gonna be running for secretary of state, you're … in charge of maintaining the voter rolls. Don't you care about if people are registered to vote from empty lots?” Speaker 1 continues questioning, asking if it’s a conspiracy theory that people are registered to vote from empty lots and mentions they have the ability to go wherever they want. They reiterate that people are currently registered to vote in empty lots, MARTA bus stations, and elsewhere in Fulton County, and asks if the other person will not do anything about that, calling back the accusation of conspiracy theories. Speaker 1 asks for the exact addresses and notes: “205 Elm Street Northwest. That’s an empty lot. You can go there right now and see it for yourself.” They press: do you not care about that? You’re an elected official, and you don’t wanna address that? They argue that as a potential secretary of state, one should address maintaining clean voter rolls in one of the United States’ most important counties. Speaker 0 repeats that what you’re doing is extremely dangerous. Speaker 1 insists it’s not a conspiracy theory and repeats that people are currently registered to vote there, highlighting the $45 purchase of voter rolls and the need to clean the rolls, including registrations from empty lots and a MARTA station. The exchange ends with Speaker 1 noting that they are trying to have the rolls cleaned, and pointing to the claim of conspiracy theory, and suggesting to actually verify the situation.

Speaker 0 recounts what happened yesterday as it relates to the actual fact pattern of law and a warrant issued by a magistrate judge based on probable cause after evidence was submitted, not a Trump-appointed judge. He notes that the law enforcement process in America works this way. He argues that declarations of perfection of the 2020 election are inconsistent with what happened, and then lays out specifics. He asserts that drop boxes were “invented out of thin air,” with no basis in Georgia law. He says mobile voting units moved through Fulton County to 80% Democrat precincts, 81% Democrat precincts to be precise, and that this was not envisioned in Georgia law. He claims 6,800,000 absentee ballot request forms with a first-class stamp were mailed to every registered voter in Georgia, again “nowhere envisioned in Georgia law.” He adds that if the same ballots are counted three times, the numbers should match, but they did not. Regarding the recount, he states that 3,930 double-scanned ballots were found in Fulton County alone, and thousands of those were confirmed by the state election board. He notes that Governor Kemp raised concerns from the Rossi report and that there were double-scanned ballots, but even after double scanning, the numbers did not match on the second recount, being off by eight hundred fifty ballots. He asks, “Not one person here can answer the question of how that happened.” He says ballot images were deleted and test ballots were included in the recount process, and that this was confirmed. He then discusses Democrats’ response to legitimate questions about the 2020 election. A former constituent, Derek Summerville, former FBI agent, ran data analysis with Mark Davis. They questioned the 6,800,000 absentee ballot request forms (with a first-class stamp), noting that if a national change of address form was filed, forwarding could occur. They identified reasonable cause to question the validity of 39,141 of those ballots cast. They found that 160 people were registered to vote from a single UPS store, 2,138 from one church in Fulton County, and 1,391 from a shuttered 1,000-square-foot building in Fulton County. The transcript states that thousands of people remain registered to vote in Fulton County at UPS stores, storage units, pack mails, and homeless shelters that haven’t been open for over five years. Summerville and Davis filed objections to these voters, but Stacey Abrams sued them in federal court and they won—Judge Jones ruled in their favor, not Stacey Abrams. The speaker notes that since then, “twelve zero” of the 39, zero voters had been removed from the voter rolls because Summerville and Davis were correct that they were no longer eligible to vote; 9,500 had updated addresses outside Fulton County, proving that those voters were ineligible. Ultimately, 84% of the votes whose eligibility Summerville and Davis challenged were proven to have been invalid voters in the 2020 election. The speaker concludes by urging an end to the charade of the most perfect, most secure election in history and advocates cleaning up Fulton County’s voter rolls for future elections.

Michigan voter data is described as a state secret that Jocelyn Benson is safeguarding from the federal government, with the speaker claiming she told authorities they can’t have it and contrasting this with the idea of not wanting the federal government to have your social security number. The speaker then alleges that Benson “gives our voter data away” to a nonprofit, and that she has done so since taking office in 2019. The nonprofit identified is the electronic registration information center, ERIC. The claim is not that Benson gives data away to ERIC per se, but that she spends taxpayer money to provide data to ERIC. The speaker contends that on television Benson presents herself as the guardian of voters’ data, while, in reality, she uses public funds to share it. After ERIC receives the voter data, the speaker says it is sent to another nonprofit, the Center for Election Innovation and Research, or CEIR. The common thread alleged between ERIC and CEIR is a liberal operative named David Becker, who is said to have founded both organizations. The speaker asserts that in 2020, Becker’s CEIR gave Benson’s nonprofit $12,000,000 on the eve of the election. The claim continues that Benson used part of this funding to purchase Jocelyn Benson campaign ads. The speaker notes that this year, Lansing Republicans attempted to pull Michigan out of ERIC, as eight other states had already left, but the Republicans could not secure the votes to do so. The transcript suggests that Republicans facing Benson in the governor’s race should make this a campaign issue. It is presented as an easy story on the campaign trail: Jocelyn Benson’s friends obtain Michigan voter data and are paid to manage it, while Michigan taxpayers fund both sides of the lawsuit between Benson and the U.S. Department of Justice. The speaker connects the financial support from CEIR to Benson’s nonprofit with the broader political dynamic involving Benson and the DOJ.

Eric Spakane, a forensic chemist and forensic document analyst, testified that there were about 25,000 ballots not printed from the official Dominion PDF ballot. He said the printing process and appearance are completely different than what you would get from a first generation PDF printing. He explained that in Maricopa County there were approximately 5,012 or a little over 5,000 different ballot permutations and combinations due to different races and districts, and this is multiplied by two because there is a Spanish version for each ballot. In total, about 5,000 different ballots are created ahead of time and are created in PDF. These PDFs are prepared in advance for mail-in ballots and for early voting, which uses vote on demand, allowing someone to vote in a downtown location using a ballot from their area. He noted that PDFs are high quality, and when printed they should look roughly the same as the PDF, but he found that the quality of these ballots degraded when printed, compared to on-demand or third-party provider printing. Spakane stated that in the group of ballots he examined, the election subcontractor Minion produced ballots for each zone or district involved in the area he looked at in Maricopa County. He reiterated that there were about 5,000 approximately different ballots, reflecting the various races and jurisdictions (e.g., two different senator races, multiple house races, and all permutations and combinations). He claimed that about 25,000 ballots were not printed from the official Dominion PDF ballot, and that the printing process produced marks that did not align with the perfect lines and breaks seen in the PDFs. He observed that early voting ballots and election-day ballots from various polling locations showed printing with breaks in all the same places around an oval, indicating imperfections in the lines at the same spots on every ballot. Speaker 1 stated that these 25,000 unidentifiable ballots alone represent over double Joe Biden's 10,457 vote mark. He framed this as a comparison to the election results. Speaker 2 claimed that in July 2021, and even in June earlier, they suspected that there were 25,000 plus counterfeit or inauthentic ballots. He attributed this to propaganda by the GOP’s attorney and other conservative operatives who allegedly planted the seed that “you can't trust that.” He asserted that everyone up there knew this in advance, even before the hearing, and criticized those involved for not reacting to prevent duplication in 2022, saying they did nothing and allowed it to be done again.

42,000 people in Nevada voted more than once, 1,500 were deceased, 19,000 didn't live in Nevada or attend college, 8,000 voted from a non-existent address, 15,000 were registered to vacant addresses, and 4,000 were noncitizens. The speaker asks if there are any ongoing prosecutions for voter fraud in Nevada, given the 130,000 instances identified in the 2020 election. The response is that there are currently no prosecutions.

They stopped counting votes on election night to determine the number of real votes and apply mail-in ballots. The speaker believes this would have happened in Texas and considers it fraud. When asked if it could have been a water leak, the speaker insists it was planned and would have occurred in Texas. They question if anyone has ever seen ballots not being counted for three hours while Trump was leading in states. The speaker asserts that anyone could have filled out the mail-in ballots and their origin cannot be determined. When challenged about it being a dangerous conspiracy theory, the speaker claims to have witnessed it happening.

The speaker claims voter rolls in swing states are full of illegal aliens and others who shouldn't be on them, alleging some register using processing center addresses. They use software integrating property tax records with voting files to identify voters not living at legal residences. In 2022, Ron Johnson and Jay Valentine exposed and removed 40,000 phantom voters in Wisconsin. The speaker advocates challenging addresses to remove illegal voters from rolls, preventing mail-in ballots from reaching them. They claim the removal of these phantom voters led to Ron Johnson's reelection. Certain NGO groups, like Catholic Charities, are allegedly helping illegal immigrants and are funded by the Republican Party. These liberal Christian charities purportedly don't believe in borders and register people to vote. The speaker alleges dark money, potentially from Chinese-controlled groups, is influencing elections in favor of Kamala Harris. They urge the Trump campaign and RNC to analyze voting files in swing states, identify voters using illegal addresses, and remove those addresses before the upcoming election.

Speaker 1 addresses the accusation of stolen elections by MAGA Republicans. Speaker 0 mentions a tweet and the claim that Brian Kemp stole an election. Speaker 1 acknowledges the question and dismisses the comparison as ridiculous. They clarify that they were referring to the threat to voting rights at that time.

Key points from the testimonies: - There is a contention that ballots were run through the counting process multiple times, possibly thousands, with Speaker 0 noting statements that ballots could have been counted up to 30,000 times. When examining the poll book and comparing it to the votes cast, it is asked whether the numbers would align with the total votes from Detroit. - Speaker 2 asserts that the poll book is "completely off," with Speaker 3 estimating an error of over 100,000 in the poll book. A Downriver resident explains arriving at 3:40 a.m. due to 38,000 ballots that were “ride here” and “sitting over there and getting counted,” framing this as an eye-opening revelation about hypocrisy. - Security measures are described as unusual: Speaker 3 notes that windows are being taped up so challengers cannot see in, or out, raising questions about transparency. - Speaker 4 describes observing that none of the names on ballots were being scanned from the ballots into electronic poll books; instead, names appeared only on supplemental sheets. They note electronic poll books were updated on Sunday, November 1, implying that thousands of new ballots would have had to be registered on November 2 or 3. The speaker began writing down names after ballots were scanned but was obstructed by five individuals, including a poll worker, a supervisor, an uncredentialed person, a Democrat challenger, and a top ABCB leader, according to their affidavit. The speaker questions whether 30,000 to 40,000 new voters could have been legally signed up in two days. - Speaker 5 reports ballots that do not belong to anybody and do not appear in voter registration. They describe ballots with no names attached and note attempts to reevaluate them by placing them in a box. Multiple ballots show several different numbers. - Speaker 6 explains that, on the tables, ballots are accompanied by a computer screen showing which ballot it is. Sometimes a ballot has no name, but the registration file shows a person born in 1921 registered long before that year (1900), suggesting anomalies. The speaker asks what is wrong with being born in 1921, while Speaker 5 emphasizes a registration dating to 1900. - Speaker 7 lists egregious items: not allowed to perform duties, GOP challengers obstructed, procedures not followed, backdating ballots from November 4 to November 2, and data entered into computers for mail-in ballots with dates of birth like 01/01/1900, absent from electronic poll books or paper supplement books prior to that. They claim dead people were voting and reference a list of 17,327 Michigan voters over 80 who voted in 2020 and were found in obituaries online. This speaker calls the election described as the most important in their lifetime and in the republic’s history. - Representative Johnson is also mentioned, with a prompt to question the turnout rate, hinting at a purported turnout of 120%. Overall, the testimonies allege discrepancies between poll books and ballots, improper registration, backdated or misdated ballots, ballots lacking identifying information, obstructions to challengers, and possible participation of non-existent or deceased voters, culminating in claims of a highly irregular election process.

Speaker 0 visits a location in California described as “home to a porta john and a giant empty parking lot,” yet inside this empty lot there are “registered voters.” He states that there are “26 registered voters for this exact location. 100 Sunset Avenue in Venice. 26 people registered to a porta john and an empty parking lot. Where do their ballots go exactly? So who's picking up the ballots? Who's voting for the people in this lovely porta john empty lot? Ask the question.” He concludes, “I think you know the answer.”

We work for a company registering Hispanic voters. Visited a Georgia complex, found 14% noncitizens registered to vote. Georgia has 339,000 noncitizens, potentially 47,000 registered. Biden won by 12,000 votes. 2024 election at risk.

Fight Voter Fraud, active in 49 states, provides free data on double-registered voters, some of whom have voted in multiple states. Voter rolls are described as a mess, with examples cited, including one individual who allegedly voted three times in North Carolina and Florida. The speaker advocates for law enforcement to prosecute egregious cases of double voting. The organization claims to have perfected methods for identifying double-registered voters, double voters, and instances of deceased individuals voting. They also address the issue of "illegals" voting. The speaker highlights a situation in Georgia where election board members verified ballot reconciliation, a process of matching voters to ballots. Democrats are allegedly suing these individuals, and the speaker suggests this is because the reconciliation rule prevents them from cheating.

In discussing the 2020 election, the speaker notes that a magistrate judge issued a warrant based on probable cause after evidence was submitted, emphasizing that the process involves a magistrate judge, not a Trump-appointed judge, and that this reflects how the law enforcement process works in America. The speaker then questions the characterization of 2020 as “perfect,” arguing that several irregularities were present in Georgia. - Drop boxes: Claimed to be “invented out of thin air” and not envisioned in Georgia law. - Mobile voting units: Reported to have moved through Fulton County to 80% (81% precisely) Democrat precincts, with the assertion that this was not envisioned in Georgia law. - Absentee ballots: Alleged that 6,800,000 absentee ballot request forms with a first-class stamp were sent to every registered voter in Georgia, a practice the speaker says was not envisioned in Georgia law. - Ballot counting and recount: A recount occurred, with 3,930 double-scanned ballots in Fulton County alone; thousands of those were confirmed by the state election board. Governor Kemp raised concerns about the Rossi report; even after double scanning, the numbers still did not match on the second recount, being off by 850 ballots. The speaker states that no one can answer how that happened. - Ballot images and test ballots: The speaker asserts that ballot images were deleted and test ballots were included in the recount process, with this confirmed. The speaker then discusses responses to legitimate questions about the 2020 election. A former constituent, Derek Summerville, a former FBI agent, worked with Mark Davis on data analysis of the 6,800,000 absentee ballot request forms (sent with first-class stamps). They identified reasonable cause to question the validity of 39,141 of those ballots that were cast. The speaker asserts that 160 people were registered to vote from a single UPS store, 2,138 from one church in Fulton County, and 1,391 from a shuttered 1,000-square-foot building in Fulton County. The claim is made that Fulton County has a messy voter roll, with thousands registered at UPS stores, storage units, pack mails, and homeless shelters that had not been open for over five years. When Summerville and Davis filed objections to these voters, Democrats responded by litigation: Stacey Abrams sued them in federal court, and they won—though the speaker clarifies it was Summerville and Davis who won, not Stacey Abrams. Judge Jones ruled in their favor. Regarding the 39,141 voters deemed questionable, the speaker asserts that twelve zero of them were removed from the voter rolls, and that 9,500 had updated addresses outside Fulton County, corroborating that those voters were ineligible. Ultimately, the speaker claims that 84% of the eligibility challenges made by Summerville and Davis were proven to involve invalid voters in the 2020 election. The remark concludes by urging an end to the narrative of the most perfect, most secure election in history and calls for Fulton County to clean up its voter rolls ahead of future elections.

Some believe that many millennials, dreamers, and undocumented people, who contribute to the country, are fearful of voting because they worry immigration will find them and deport their families. One speaker claims that this is untrue because voting is confidential and voting rolls are not transferred for investigation. Another speaker expresses disbelief, stating that the President is questioning whether an illegal person is voting, and reminding people that only citizens can vote. The speaker believes the President is saying not to worry about being caught for illegal voting. The speaker emphasizes that undocumented people cannot vote because they are not citizens.

Speaker 0 claims most people in the country voted for Trump and that he won the popular vote. Speaker 1 disputes this, stating it was a slim majority of voters and that too few people voted. Speaker 0 says those who cared about issues voted for Trump to eliminate waste, fraud, and abuse. Speaker 1 counters that lots of voters were purged from voter rolls before the election. Speaker 0 accuses Speaker 1 of election denial. Speaker 1 accuses the "narcissist in that building" of gaslighting.

Speaker 0 states that whatever a machine tabulates is what it tabulates, and their hand-marked ballot remains the same. Speaker 1 claims ballot images were changed, and that's reflected in the totals, referencing report number 3. Speaker 0 says they've read the reports. Speaker 1 asserts that Speaker 0 knows what they're saying is true. Speaker 1 says their life is on the line. Speaker 0 denies believing Speaker 1 and finds it insulting to have that put on the record. Speaker 1 apologizes, stating that wasn't their intent.

Speaker 0: I won, but they cheated. We were robbed of an election. Speaker 1: I don't think it's dangerous to use words like rigged and steal because we can back it up. Speaker 0: The election was stolen from the voters, not just from me. I won't concede because our democracy is being eroded. Speaker 1: The election was not free and fair. Thousands of Georgians had their voices stolen. We can't guarantee their votes will be counted in 2020. Speaker 2: Should the Democratic nominee concede if they can prove widespread voter suppression? Speaker 1: No, we shouldn't concede until we know the results. If it looks like cheating or rigging, it probably is. Speaker 0: We've been taught to accept defeat, but I refuse to concede. The process was not fair. Speaker 1: The election was stolen from Georgia voters. As long as eligible citizens can't vote, the system is rigged. I didn't lose, I just didn't win. Speaker 0: I didn't win officially. We don't know what really happened because of voter suppression. Speaker 1: He is the legal governor, but that doesn't mean he won legitimately. Speaker 0: Just because you win doesn't mean you won. We'll never know for sure if I got more votes. Speaker 1: I refuse to concede because it wasn't fair or right. He performed poorly and crassly against the people he represents. Speaker 1: Georgia voters were suppressed, their votes weren't counted. Brian Kemp dismantled our democracy. Speaker 0: I recognize I'm not the governor, but we won.

Speaker 0 states that California is failing to abide by the NVRA and make its voter rolls clean, giving the example of 1,000,000 voters in Los Angeles County alone. Speaker 0 claims the county of Los Angeles agreed in a consent decree. Speaker 1 interjects, saying the county agreed to adopt additional practices on maintaining voter rolls and that all lawsuits were unsuccessful. Speaker 0 responds that this is untrue and that they have won several lawsuits against California at the United States Supreme Court.

Speaker 0 presents what he calls an explosive piece of tape: a man buys a registration form for an absentee ballot from a voter, pocketing $200 and expecting to collect the ballot when the voter receives it. Speaker 1 reacts, noting the illegality of the act and questioning why it isn’t illegal to do certain things, followed by a line that “We don’t get illegal” and a claim about lions, then attributes responsibility to someone who “came up with all this.” Speaker 0 continues, stating that she started the whole “pay to vote” scheme. He alleges that “the people that work for Ilhan” are actually counting the ballots, counting the vote. Speaker 1 adds that they “become a manager in the prison too,” claiming that those people “walk with you to the booth, and then they vote, oh, vote this guy. Vote this guy. Vote even if you speak English.” Speaker 0 introduces James O’Keefe, identifying himself as a truth exposer who holds the corrupt elite accountable, and pivots to messaging about protecting readers’ freedom and finances. The segment shifts to a financial pitch. O’Keefe warns of one of the biggest financial shifts of their lifetime, describing de-dollarization with nations like China, Russia, and Saudi Arabia moving away from US dollars. He claims this threatens savings and retirement security and cites Ray Dalio’s warning about skyrocketing debt, relentless money printing, and a weakening dollar as part of a dangerous cycle that could impact Americans. He asserts that more Americans are turning to real assets like physical gold and silver, noting that gold “surged past $3,700 per ounce,” and that momentum is building. He says he has partnered with veteran-owned American Independence Gold to help viewers take action, offering to open a qualifying account with up to $10,000 in bonus gold and a free gold protection guide. He adds that a portion of every sale supports Tunnel to Towers and wounded warriors, and closes with the line, “Freedom isn’t given, it’s secured,” followed by the disclaimer, “This is James O’Keefe. As always, this is not financial advice. Always check with your licensed financial advisor before you invest.”