reSee.it - Related Video Feed

The speaker claims that COVID vaccines had more risks than benefits. They argue that the risk of infection increased, while the risk of hospitalization and death from COVID remained unchanged. They also suggest that all-cause mortality increased due to the vaccines. The speaker criticizes the vaccines as one of the worst interventions in medical history. They mention global censorship, where those trying to speak the truth are censored. Additionally, they highlight immunity for drug companies and intimidation tactics, such as job loss or loss of credentials, against doctors who speak the truth.

In the video, the speaker discusses the significant reduction in confirmed influenza cases in the United States and Canada during the COVID-19 pandemic. They mention that in the US, there was a 99.995% reduction in cases, while in Canada, the numbers dropped from 55,379 to 69. The speaker suggests that this may be due to a renaming of cases or the high cycle thresholds used in PCR testing. They also mention discrepancies in reporting and vaccination status data in Newfoundland and Labrador. The speaker notes that all 11 deaths reported in a specific period were fully vaccinated individuals, and they personally know unvaccinated individuals over the age of 70.

Wir hatten in Deutschland im Jahr 2020 historisch niedrige Krankenhausbelegungen und keine außergewöhnlichen Atemwegserkrankungen. Die Sterblichkeit stieg erst 2021 an. Schweden schnitt ohne Masken und Lockdowns besser ab. Die Politik reagierte mit übertriebenen Maßnahmen, isolierte Alte und verursachte Existenzschäden. Gerichte und Medien versagten bei der Überprüfung. Es gab eine Kriminalisierung von Kritikern und eine Verharmlosung von Impfschäden. Es werden Fragen zur Regierungshandlung während der Pandemie gestellt. Bestseller reflektieren die Stimmung. Ein Untersuchungsausschuss wurde abgelehnt, daher ist Aufklärung wichtig. Translation: We had historically low hospital occupancy rates in Germany in 2020 and no extraordinary respiratory diseases. Mortality only increased in 2021. Sweden performed better without masks and lockdowns. The government responded with exaggerated measures, isolating the elderly and causing economic damage. Courts and media failed to review. There was a criminalization of critics and a downplaying of vaccine injuries. Questions are being raised about government action during the pandemic. Bestsellers reflect the mood. An inquiry was rejected, so clarification is important.

The video claims that the French government ordered doctors to use a restricted drug on the elderly, while in the US, hospitals were allegedly bribed to diagnose COVID and use ventilators that caused deaths. The World Health Organization and governments are accused of suppressing successful treatments and preventing autopsies that could reveal the true cause of death. Mask-wearing is said to be ineffective and harmful, and the UK lockdown is criticized for causing more deaths than it prevents. The video also mentions a rise in suicides among young people and increased poverty worldwide.

In this video, the speaker discusses a report by Canadian scientists on the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic and vaccine rollout on overall death rates. The scientists analyzed data from multiple countries and found that all-cause mortality increased every time COVID-19 vaccines were deployed. They also observed unprecedented peaks in mortality following the rollout of boosters in most countries. The report states that there is no evidence of a beneficial effect from the vaccine rollouts, and no country showed improved all-cause mortality trends. The speaker urges viewers to share the report with others to help them make informed decisions about COVID-19 vaccination.

Wir hatten historisch niedrige Klinikbelegungen in Deutschland 2020, weniger schwere Atemwegserkrankungen, und die Sterblichkeit stieg erst 2021. Schweden schnitt besser ab als Deutschland laut WHO. Die Pandemie basierte auf Massentests mit schwankenden Ergebnissen. Politik reagierte mit Lockdowns, Schulschließungen, und isolierte Alte. Kritiker wurden kriminalisiert, Medien folgten dem PCR-Narrativ. Es gab keine Gefahr, aber die Politik schürte Angst. Warum die Kehrtwende zu Massnahmen? Warum Zwangsimpfungen? Bestseller reflektieren die Stimmung. Ein Untersuchungsausschuss wäre angemessen gewesen. Vielen Dank. Translation: We had historically low hospital occupancy rates in Germany in 2020, fewer severe respiratory illnesses, and mortality only increased in 2021. Sweden performed better than Germany according to the WHO. The pandemic was based on mass testing with fluctuating results. Politics responded with lockdowns, school closures, and isolating the elderly. Critics were criminalized, media followed the PCR narrative. There was no danger, but politics fueled fear. Why the turnaround to measures? Why forced vaccinations? Bestsellers reflect the mood. An investigative committee would have been appropriate. Thank you very much.

According to the speaker, the all-cause mortality data contradicts the idea of a viral respiratory pandemic. They argue that spikes in mortality during the COVID period were due to assaults on vulnerable people through medical treatment. Different jurisdictions had different methods of assault, such as overusing HCQ or using ventilators. They claim that more than half the countries in the world had no excess mortality until the vaccines were rolled out, which resulted in a surge of deaths. Even in India, there was no excess mortality until the vaccines were introduced, causing a significant increase in deaths.

In this video, the speaker discusses their conclusions on all-cause mortality and the pandemic. They claim that if governments had not taken any extraordinary measures, there would have been no excess mortality beyond the usual trend. They argue that the measures implemented by governments caused varying levels of excess mortality in different jurisdictions. Additionally, they assert that the COVID-19 vaccination campaign itself resulted in excess mortality, with different doses and age groups being associated with peaks in deaths. The speaker promises to provide specific numbers in their presentation.

In this video, the speaker presents five key points regarding the COVID-19 pandemic in Germany. Firstly, the speaker mentions that hospital occupancy reached an all-time low in 2020, while severe respiratory illnesses decreased. Secondly, the number of deaths in 2020 was not significantly higher than usual. Thirdly, the average age of those who died from COVID-19 was 83, while the average age of other deceased individuals was 82. Fourthly, Sweden, without strict lockdown measures, performed better than Germany according to the World Health Organization. Lastly, the speaker criticizes the government's response to the pandemic, including the closure of schools and businesses, isolation of the elderly, and the suppression of dissenting voices. The speaker questions the necessity of lockdowns and the forced administration of experimental vaccines.

Coronavirus critic and finance scientist, Professor Dr. Stefan Bomburg, discusses the impact of COVID-19 measures in Germany. He highlights five key points: hospital occupancy reached an all-time low in 2020, there were fewer severe respiratory illnesses and deaths, overall mortality rates remained normal, the average age of COVID-19 deaths was 83, and Sweden performed better than Germany without strict measures. He criticizes the government's response, including the closure of schools and businesses, isolation of the elderly, and the criminalization of dissenting voices. He questions the lack of proportionality in court rulings and media coverage, and the push for experimental vaccines. He suggests that a thorough investigation is needed to restore trust.

The speaker makes several points in this video. Firstly, they claim that the virus is not spread by asymptomatic individuals and that testing asymptomatic people generates false positives and unnecessary concerns. They also argue that natural immunity to COVID-19 is strong and long-lasting, and cannot be improved upon by vaccination. The speaker asserts that COVID-19 is easily treatable at home, especially if treatment is started early, and that hospitalization and death can be largely avoided with proper care. Lastly, they state that current COVID-19 vaccines are ineffective against new variants and may even be causing harm.

In this video, the speaker presents data on COVID-19 deaths in Canada. They point out that the official number of deaths reported by the government is 52,000, which is used to create fear. However, the speaker reveals that the actual number of deaths is 36,000, as provinces and territories have been adjusting their data to exclude deaths with COVID rather than from COVID. The speaker suggests that this is an attempt to cover up the true impact of the disease.

This video criticizes the handling of the COVID-19 pandemic by the World Health Organization (WHO). It argues that the WHO misrepresented the case fatality rate (CFR) and infection fatality rate (IFR) of the virus, causing unnecessary fear. The video also questions the validity of asymptomatic transmission and highlights the negative consequences of lockdown measures, such as increased poverty, mental health issues, and disrupted education. It criticizes the effectiveness of mask mandates and PCR testing, and warns of the erosion of civil liberties. The speaker urges viewers to push back against the threats to our civilization.

In this video, the speaker reflects on their PowerPoint slide pack from April-May 2020, which contained facts and data about the COVID-19 pandemic. They discuss various points, including the low death rate, the lack of difference between countries with and without lockdowns, the ineffectiveness of masks, and the correlation between flu shots and increased risk of respiratory infections. The speaker emphasizes the importance of not forgetting this information and encourages viewers to share the facts and data to counter mainstream bias. They also express gratitude to their supporters.

In Deutschland gab es im Jahr 2020 und 2021 weniger schwere Atemwegserkrankungen als üblich. Die Sterblichkeit stieg erst ab 2021 an. Schweden schnitt besser ab als Deutschland. Die Regierung reagierte mit Lockdowns und Zwangsmaßnahmen, während Kritiker kriminalisiert wurden. Es gab eine Kehrtwende in den Maßnahmen, obwohl keine besondere Gefahr bestand. Die Politik zwang die Bevölkerung zur Impfung mit experimentellen Impfstoffen. Es gibt Bestseller, die die Ereignisse kritisch beleuchten. Ein Untersuchungsausschuss wurde abgelehnt, daher ist es wichtig, dass wir zur Aufklärung beitragen. Translation: In Germany, there were fewer severe respiratory illnesses in 2020 and 2021 than usual. Mortality only increased from 2021 onwards. Sweden performed better than Germany. The government responded with lockdowns and mandatory measures, while critics were criminalized. There was a turnaround in the measures, despite no significant danger. The government forced the population to get vaccinated with experimental vaccines. There are bestsellers that critically examine the events. An investigative committee was rejected, so it is important that we contribute to clarification.

The speaker discusses the disappearance of the flu during the COVID-19 pandemic and questions why it was not as prevalent as usual. They explore various explanations, including the idea that COVID-19 was more contagious and therefore outcompeted the flu. They also mention studies suggesting that social distancing and mask-wearing measures effectively eradicated the flu. The speaker raises concerns about the financial incentives hospitals received for COVID-19 cases and suggests that misdiagnosing flu cases as COVID-19 may have occurred. They conclude that corruption and control may have played a role in the handling of the pandemic. The speaker encourages viewers to join their community for more information and understanding.

In this video, the speaker discusses the significant excess mortality following the COVID-19 pandemic and questions the safety and effectiveness of the vaccines. They argue that the excess mortality is correlated with the vaccination campaigns and call for independent investigations into the relationship between the vaccines and the excess deaths. The speaker criticizes other political parties for promoting and embracing the vaccines without addressing the concerns raised by their party. Another speaker responds by defending their party's stance on vaccinations and arguing against the speaker's accusations. The debate becomes heated as both speakers exchange arguments and counter-arguments. The video ends with the announcement of a suspension until the minister speaks.

In this video, the speaker discusses five key points related to the COVID-19 pandemic in Germany. Firstly, the speaker mentions that hospital occupancy reached an all-time low in 2020. Secondly, there were fewer respiratory illnesses reported during this time, as COVID-19 replaced the flu. Thirdly, the number of deaths in 2020 was not significantly higher than usual. Fourthly, the average age of those who died from COVID-19 was 83, while the average age of other deceased individuals was 82. Lastly, the World Health Organization (WHO) stated that Sweden, without strict lockdown measures, fared better than Germany. The speaker emphasizes the importance of these facts and criticizes the government's response to the pandemic.

The speaker discusses the disappearance of the flu during the COVID-19 pandemic and questions why it was not reported in statistics. They explore various explanations, including the idea that COVID-19 was more contagious and therefore outcompeted the flu. They also mention a study from Harvard suggesting that social distancing and mask-wearing measures effectively eradicated the flu. The speaker raises concerns about the inconsistency in the effectiveness of these measures against COVID-19. They also mention financial incentives for hospitals to diagnose COVID-19 cases, which may have led to misdiagnosis or overreporting. The speaker concludes that corruption and control may be behind these inconsistencies.

The speaker, a scientist, claims to have extensive knowledge in various scientific fields and criticizes the COVID-19 pandemic as intense propaganda. They argue that there is no evidence of a pandemic or a particularly deadly pathogen. They emphasize the importance of analyzing unbiased data on all-cause mortality, which they claim shows no pandemic. The speaker also discusses their research on global warming and asserts that it is not occurring. They then shift focus to vaccines, stating that they are toxic and associated with increased mortality rates. They claim to have studied over 100 countries and found a correlation between vaccines and higher mortality. The speaker concludes by stating their intention to continue their research and challenge the establishment scientists.

The speaker, a former Pfizer employee, claims that the information and safety measures provided by governments regarding the virus are false. They argue that PCR testing is unreliable and that the public should disregard case rates and announcements. They warn of a hidden agenda and urge people to pay attention and take action. The video includes various news clips reporting on COVID-19 cases and deaths. The speaker questions the accuracy of COVID-19 death counts and compares the virus to the flu. They also discuss the lack of flu cases during the pandemic and suggest that flu cases were mislabeled as COVID-19. The speaker criticizes the PCR test and accuses governments of manipulating the results to drive their agenda. They highlight the potential dangers of the vaccines and express skepticism towards the medical establishment. The video concludes with a call to resist fear and manipulation and to seek the truth.

In this video, the speaker raises concerns about excess deaths and the lack of attention they receive. They discuss the pattern of excess deaths across countries and the need for data transparency. The speaker questions the accuracy of excess death calculations and highlights the failure to collect data on deaths referred to the coroner. They also discuss the increase in deaths among younger age groups and the potential link to vaccination. The speaker calls for a suspension of the experimental COVID-19 vaccines and a thorough investigation into their harms. They argue that the regulators have failed to protect the public and that evidence-based medicine and basic ethics should be prioritized.

Wir hatten in Deutschland im Jahr 2020 historisch niedrige Klinikbelegungen, weniger schwere Atemwegserkrankungen und keine erhöhte Sterblichkeit. Schweden schnitt besser ab als Deutschland laut WHO. Die Regierung reagierte mit harten Maßnahmen, während Gerichte, Medien und Wissenschaft versagten. Es gab Kriminalisierung von Maßnahmenkritikern, fehlende Prüfung der Verhältnismäßigkeit der Maßnahmen und Panikmache. Es werden Fragen zur Regierungshandlung in der Pandemie gestellt, wie die Verabreichung experimenteller Impfstoffe und das Fehlen eines Untersuchungsausschusses. Bestseller-Bücher reflektieren die Stimmung der Bevölkerung. Anklagen gegen die Regierung werden erhoben. Translation: We had historically low hospital admissions, fewer severe respiratory illnesses, and no increased mortality in Germany in 2020. Sweden performed better than Germany according to the WHO. The government responded with harsh measures, while courts, media, and science failed. There was criminalization of critics of the measures, lack of examination of the proportionality of the measures, and fear-mongering. Questions are being raised about government actions during the pandemic, such as the administration of experimental vaccines and the absence of a parliamentary inquiry. Bestselling books reflect the mood of the population. Charges against the government are being made.

The speaker questions the need for COVID vaccinations, stating that the recovery rate is higher than the flu. They also mention a belief that global population should be reduced to 500 million to be in harmony with nature. The speaker argues that the world is mostly unpopulated, despite densely populated areas. They reference a scientist who claims the COVID virus contains strains of malaria and HIV, suggesting it could not have occurred naturally. The speaker expresses concern that mRNA injections weaken the immune system and may cause people to die, citing instances of athletes collapsing. They mention a YouTube episode by Mark Staying that discusses people losing loved ones after vaccination.

The speaker, a scientist, claims to have extensive knowledge in various scientific fields. They express skepticism towards the COVID-19 pandemic, stating that there is no evidence of a particularly virulent pathogen causing death. They argue that all-cause mortality data does not support the existence of a pandemic. The speaker also discusses their research on global warming, asserting that there is no global warming and that CO2 levels do not significantly affect the Earth's temperature. They then shift their focus to vaccines, claiming that they are toxic and associated with increased mortality rates, particularly among the elderly. The speaker concludes by stating their intention to continue their research and challenge the establishment scientists who they believe are spreading propaganda.