reSee.it - Related Video Feed

So many people ask how to get rid of WiFi. Here’s the approach: get an Ethernet cord and a USB adapter. Log in to your router by going to the IP on the back of the box with whatever device you have. Find the wireless settings. You have guest WiFi, which you’re going to turn off, and 2.4 and 5 gigahertz bands, which you’re also going to turn off. Make sure all this is turned off. Then take that Ethernet cord and stick it into the back of your router. Next, take the other side of the Ethernet cord with the adapter and plug it into your computer, and wait for it. In about a second, you’ve got the Internet without WiFi. Why would you get rid of WiFi? Because of microwave sickness, headaches, dizziness, sleep issues, insomnia, fatigue, nausea, heart palpitations, memory loss, ringing of the ears, skin rashes, muscle and joint pain, leg and root pain, tingling, irritability, numbness, nosebleeds, depression, and anxiety. It doesn’t sound too safe. For reference, my phone’s on airplane mode right now to show everything’s off with an Ethernet cord. You can do it for your phones too. If you’ve got 5G, switch it to 4G or airplane mode. There will always be those who say it’s all safe, but the US Navy did 2,000 studies in 1971 on the dangers of wireless technology. And here’s what they found: depression, impotence, anxiety, lack of concentration, dizziness, sleepiness, insomnia, irritability, chest pain, and tremors. Probably a good idea to have wires. Last but not least, there’s a $13 book that’s 600 pages long on the topic, Things to Look Into.

- My concern about five g is that the RF radiation from five g is dangerous. - It penetrates the it it disrupts the blood brain barrier. - It also is associated with glioblastomas and other cancers. - And there are literally thousands and thousands of studies in that. - I've litigated on that issue, and I've won in the Federal Court of Appeals. - Other countries regulate it much better than us, and we need to protect our children. - We should not be having these antennas on elementary schools. - We should be warning people appropriately. - Do not put that cell phone next year ahead. - Oh, you know, we're we're seeing this epidemic now of glioblastomas, and almost all of them are connected to the year that you favor the cell phone with. - There are study after study that shows that, and I'm in litigation on that issue right now.

The speaker asserts that WiFi can cook the water in the body, despite conventional claims that it only heats water a little. The core idea is that WiFi signals have the potential to affect bodily water, including water in the eyes. If a home is not hardwired with an Ethernet connection and relies on WiFi, there are unwanted frequencies pulsing throughout the home. These pulsing frequencies, according to the speaker, can actually cook the water in the eyes. As a consequence, while people are performing detoxing, exercises, and efforts to restore balance of their eyes, they should also focus on getting rid of WiFi from their house. The speaker emphasizes that all spectrums of WiFi operate on the same spectrum as a microwave, specifically at 2.4 gigahertz. The speaker points out that microwaves are labeled 2.4, and WiFi uses 2.4 as well. According to the speaker, this constant pulsing throughout the house can slow down people’s repairing because the body is being bombarded by these signals. In summary, the speaker links WiFi exposure to potential effects on bodily water, including eye water, and argues for eliminating WiFi from the home to avoid continuous pulsing frequencies that purportedly interfere with the body's repair processes, reinforcing the claim by drawing a parallel between WiFi’s 2.4 GHz spectrum and microwave radiation.

Speaker 0: Kevin Matas, with the California Brain Tumor Association, collaborates with emfscientist.org and other groups—two hundred doctors and scientists from 39 countries—who have looked at health effects from wireless radiation. From their work and others, we can clearly say that wireless radiation can cause cancer, neurological problems, immune system disorders, and reproductive harm. Our scientists, along with other groups, include people developing wireless health effects from various sources—brain tumors from cell phone radiation, neurological symptoms from Wi-Fi in schools, neurological and cancerous health effects from simple smart meters. Smart meters are wireless meters on homes to avoid manual readings. Regardless of the source, the health effects can be the same. Cell towers are the most powerful source of wireless radiation emissions. What brings me here today is the rollout of five Gs technology, which is very different from 2G, 3G, and 4G. This is because the wireless radiation uses a higher frequency. Our current wireless technology uses about 1 gigahertz to 4 gigahertz; this new five G technology is ultra high frequency, ultra high intensity, at 24 gigahertz to 90 gigahertz. To put this in perspective, 90 gigahertz is 90,000,000,000 electromagnetic waves per second hitting your body. We know people are already getting sick from the lower frequencies and we expect, our scientists expect, that these higher ultra high frequency microwaves are going to bring people to disease quicker and in a more intense form. The other problem with five G technology is these microwaves are very short. Old microwaves were about two and a half to three feet long; these are now about an inch to a half an inch long, and they don't travel very well. So they're going to have to put a little cell tower transmitter in front of about every two to 10 homes. This is a big problem because cancer rates around regular cell towers are about three or four times what they are normally, so we’re seeing a lot of things. It’s going to be continuous exposure as with other cell towers, but it will be emitting a much more higher frequency, high intensity wireless radiation. Speaker 1: Ladies and gentlemen, not only are these five G death towers going to double cancer rates in our country, they are going to be used to target individuals in a way never seen before. Since most people keep their smartphones on them like a tracking device, and since their political profiles are linked to their phones, it only makes sense that this is going to be an easy way to target people silently and without a trace. As you can see with these new five G death towers, they are going to be focusing beams of high frequency energy at a user's location. These five G death towers are in fact particle beam weapons that can be aimed at people. These particle beams move at the speed of light and track you wherever you go, and in most cases you'll be hit with particle beams coming from multiple directions. This truly is a national emergency considering who controls this technology. You saw how the IRS targeted conservatives. You saw how the FBI covered up the Las Vegas and Hillary investigations. Well, what do you think this beast system is going to do with Christians and conservatives on their networks? Zap, zap, and double zap. That's what admit it. That's what you would do if you were doctor evil. You'd poison the food, the air, the water, and you'd use these death towers to slowly induce cancer. Have no doubt about it. These five G death towers are bad news any way you look at it. So go to your city council meetings. Protest these bad boys from coming up in your neighborhood before it's too late. If you're listening to this, you are the resistance.

The speaker asserts that microwave sickness, not pathogens or contaminated water, was the root cause of the pandemic, specifically naming 5G rollout as the culprit. According to the speaker, people received upgrades to their phones and had a cell tower installed in front of their homes, and this, he claims, equated to the pandemic itself. He references “zapping of America” to describe neurological and systemic symptoms associated with microwave exposure, listing heaviness in the head, fatigue, irritability, anxiety, insomnia, partial memory loss, cardiovascular issues, slow heartbeat, reduced blood pressure, and heart pains. He links these symptoms to microwave sickness and cites that the Soviets observed similar dangers with wireless technology in the 1950s, while American doctors dismissed those concerns, calling them Soviet or not credible. This dismissal, he contends, allowed wireless frequencies to be intensified to extreme levels. The speaker argues that health issues in America have risen because electricity and wireless frequencies are at a “level 10,000,” whereas other countries regulate to a “level five,” implying that higher electromagnetic frequencies lead to illness across populations. He repeats the idea that increasing electromagnetic frequencies on Earth is directly linked to widespread sickness. He also references Laura and makes an analogy to the Spanish flu, specifically the Kansas flu, claiming there was a radio on a Kansas military base that made people sick, using it to support the claim that wireless transmission or exposure contributed to disease. Based on these assertions, the speaker states a personal stance that his house has no wireless technology, implying a preventive or precautionary measure against exposure. Overall, the speaker presents a narrative that attributes the pandemic to the rollout of 5G and associated wireless infrastructure, framing microwave sickness as the real illness experienced by the population, supported by cited historical observations, unnamed references, and a critique of conventional medical and scientific responses. The argument emphasizes a direct causal link between elevated electromagnetic frequencies and widespread health problems, arguing that higher exposure correlates with greater illness and that other nations’ more conservative frequency practices mitigate these issues.

The speaker discusses the difference in radiation exposure between Switzerland and the US, stating that the Swiss use significantly less radiation and have no excess deaths. They claim that 5G is a weapon of mass destruction and can cause mass casualties within minutes by depriving people of oxygen. The speaker emphasizes the need for understanding this technology and taking steps to protect oneself. They suggest taking back power and electing honest individuals to positions of authority while shutting down complicit agencies.

Speaker 0 asserts that microwave radiation around people is severely limited by practical constraints, yet cites a report from the Army on millimeter waves that references three hundred fifty studies showing clear biological effects even below thermal thresholds and below established safety guidelines. The claim emphasizes that the subjects in these studies were aware of what was happening in a substantial portion of cases, ranging from thirty percent to eighty percent, because skin and eyes are disproportionately affected by wireless radiation. The argument is that such exposure would impact the skin and nerves, thereby affecting the entire nervous system, and would also expose eyes to military-grade wireless radiation. The speaker further contends that this exposure would involve placing directed radiation in front of people’s homes and forcing it into their rooms, describing the situation as absolutely absurd. A video is mentioned from FCC proceedings in which one of the five G engineers reportedly states that directed beams are being aimed into people’s windows at levels not permitted in their own safety laboratories or safety guidelines. The speaker reiterates that the FCC did not treat this as a pressing issue, describing the stance as shrugging it off and indicating that it isn’t something to be discussed at that time. Key points highlighted include: - The Army report on millimeter waves referencing three hundred fifty studies showing biological effects below thermal and safety guideline levels. - A significant portion of study subjects purportedly aware of the exposure, due to the skin and eyes absorbing a disproportionate share of wireless radiation. - The assertion that exposure could affect the skin and nervous system, with particular emphasis on neurological impacts and ocular exposure. - The claim that directed beams could be placed in front of residential windows and forced into people’s rooms, described as absurd. - A video excerpt from FCC proceedings where a five-G engineer supposedly admits to directing beams into people’s windows at levels not allowed in safety labs. - The speaker’s claim that the FCC dismissed the issue as not needing discussion at that moment. Overall, the speaker builds a narrative that there are documented biological effects at non-thermal exposure levels, that individuals could be knowingly exposed in everyday environments, and that regulatory bodies have not treated the issue with the urgency or seriousness implied by the presented evidence.

Speaker 0 describes smart meters in the context of a book, showing a plant and a smart meter, and notes that “that side's all cooked.” They claim that this illustrates what “they don’t tell people.” The speaker asserts that a smart meter catches fire and that a utility company denies homeowner damage claims, with insurance not covering fires. They reference “all these fires” and say there have been fires across the country linked to smart meters. They question how safety is tested, claiming that “this is a plastic dummy” and “that’s a phone” used to demonstrate safety, followed by the statement “And then what about plants exposed to Wi Fi? Look at this. No Wi Fi.” The speaker contrasts the apparent demonstration with alleged real-world risk to plants from wireless technology. The speaker adds a claim about the Navy, stating that it “knew 5,000 studies on the dangers of wireless technology.” They offer an example as “one good one” and connect Wi-Fi to thyroid issues, asserting “Thyroid issues, Wi Fi.”

The speaker demonstrates the levels of electromagnetic radiation emitted by various devices. They show that when the microwave is off, there is minimal radiation. However, when it is turned on, the levels increase significantly. They compare the radiation levels from using mobile data and Wi-Fi to being close to a microwave oven. The speaker also measures the radiation levels inside a car and finds that it is consistently high. They mention experiencing a headache after a test drive, attributing it to the constant exposure to radiation from mobile phones.

To switch from 5G to 4G, go to settings, then cellular data, and change the setting from 5G to LTE or 4G. According to the speaker, 5G is 300 times stronger than 4G and caused the 2020 pandemic. The speaker claims switching to 4G will alleviate headaches, improve sense of smell, and stop dizziness, hair loss, and heart palpitations. The speaker asserts there are zero long-term studies on 5G. A senator asked if there were any long-term studies of 5G before its rollout, and was told there are no industry-backed studies currently. The speaker concludes that the public is the study, and avoids new technologies like AirPods and smartwatches, because they believe the safety testing is inadequate.

The speaker says they have no Wi‑Fi, no Bluetooth, and no wireless devices in their house, arguing that people do not have to have wireless technology “pinging microwaves” throughout their home. They note that someone will object by saying it’s “not microwaves,” then respond by citing a book called *The Zapping of America* and a book described as *Microwaves and the Deadly Risk*, written by Paul B. Brodeur. The speaker claims the book explains how microwave technology was “created by Raytheon,” including “the first cell phone created by Raytheon” and “the first wireless technology created by Raytheon.” They further claim that the Department of Defense, described as “Raytheon,” wants people to have wireless technology in their house because it not only “cooks them” and causes health issues (they list autoimmune, “lots of smell, lots of taste, dizziness, brain fog”), but also because wireless technology allows people “to watch the people.” They state that when you have wireless, “people can see what’s in the house.” The speaker concludes by saying *The Sapping of America* by Paul Brodeur is recommended and adds that Brodeur is “a Frenchman,” encouraging viewers to look into the books.

Wi-Fi, being so prevalent, might be negatively impacting our health. I believe it degrades mitochondria and compromises the blood-brain barrier. I found an article suggesting radiofrequency radiation affects the blood-brain barrier's permeability and alters microRNA expression in the brain, potentially leading to neurodegenerative diseases. Research indicates this has been expanded on by researchers in China with a published article. They even call it leaky brain. It seems findings in the US were followed by suppression, misinformation, and a shutdown of government-funded research. It's the same old story.

The speaker believes 5G RF radiation is dangerous, disrupting the blood-brain barrier and causing glioblastomas, other cancers, and dramatic health effects. They claim there are thousands of studies supporting this and that they have litigated and won on this issue in the Federal Court of Appeals. They also won a case against Monsanto regarding glyphosate and Hodgkin's lymphoma, which was also called a conspiracy theory. The speaker asserts 5G is under-regulated in the US compared to other countries. They advocate for protecting children by not placing antennas on elementary schools and warning people about cell phone usage, citing an epidemic of glioblastomas linked to the ear favored for cell phone use. They state there are many studies showing this and that they are currently in litigation on this issue.

In the video, Speaker 0 explains that LED lights are being pushed aggressively, even given away for free, because they will connect everything in the Internet of Things. These LED lights can be connected to a cellphone, a tablet, all home appliances, the thermostat, cars, the garage, and more, allowing monitoring and data collection from these devices. They can also be used to turn off devices based on climate reasons and other factors, meaning you are connected up to the Internet of Things. What’s interesting, according to the speaker, is that these LED lights “ping a lot of microwave radiation,” which will be demonstrated in the next video. The speaker describes using a TriField EMF tester to check the radiation coming off the LED lights and shows results labeled as “off the charts.” The claim is that by bringing these lights into the home, microwave radiation is being pinged into the house. The speaker asserts that this microwave radiation can impact health, listing effects on the heart, brain, eyes, skin, and other organs. The LED lights’ capability to connect to the Internet of Things is highlighted again as part of this scenario. The video then notes a claim about a 2016 announcement from the AMA, stating that LED lights can increase the risk of cataracts and eye degeneration, implying long-term harm to eyesight while allegedly promoting environmental aims. In summary, the narrator claims: - LED lights are being pushed and given away because they enable the Internet of Things, connecting to smartphones, tablets, home appliances, thermostats, cars, and garages for monitoring and control. - These LEDs allegedly “ping a lot of microwave radiation,” detectable with an EMF tester, described as “off the charts.” - The radiation entering the home is claimed to impact health, including the heart, brain, eyes, skin, and other organs, in addition to enabling IoT connectivity. - The speaker cites a 2016 AMA statement asserting that LED lights can increase the risk of cataracts and eye degeneration.

People can create energy weapons using a microwave oven by opening it and pointing it through walls, causing harm to neighbors. Microwaves emit radiation that can make people sick. The speaker warns against using microwaves for cooking due to health risks, citing research on digestive tract cancer. AirPods Pro emit similar levels of radiation as microwaves, posing potential health concerns. The speaker advises against consuming microwaved food and recommends avoiding restaurants that use microwaves for cooking.

Speaker 0: So many people ask how to get rid of Wi Fi. So what you're gonna do, you're gonna get an Ethernet cord and a USB adapter like that. Next, what you're gonna do is you're gonna log in to your router. So you're gonna go to the back of the box. You're gonna find an IP on there. You're gonna log in to your router on whatever device you have, and then you're gonna find all these wireless settings. So you have guest WiFi, which you're gonna turn off 2.4, five gigahertz. You're also gonna turn off all your regular wireless. Make sure all this is turned off. Now you're gonna take that Ethernet cord that you bought, and you're gonna stick it into the back of your router. And then next, what you're gonna do is you're gonna take the other side of the Ethernet cord with the adapter, stick it right into your computer, and you're gonna wait for it. And then in about a second, you got the Internet without Wi Fi. Now someone's gonna ask, well, why did you get rid of Wi Fi? Well, microwave sickness, headaches, dizziness, sleep issues, insomnia, fatigue, nausea, heart palpitations, memory loss, ringing of the ears, skin rashes, muscle and joint pain, leg and root pain, tingling, irritability, numbness, nosebleeds, depression, and anxiety. Doesn't sound too safe. And just for the record, my phone's on airplane mode right now and see how everything's off with an Ethernet cord. You can do it for your phones too. And if you got five g, turn it to four g or airplane mode. And there'll always be those Muppets who just say it's all safe, but the US Navy did 2,000 studies in 1971 on the dangers of wireless technology. So it's been known. And here's what they found, depression, impotence, anxiety, lack of concentration, dizziness, sleepiness, insomnia, irritability, chest pain, and tremors. Probably a good idea to have wires. And last but not least, here's a $13 book that's 600 pages long on the topic. Things to look into.

The speaker says they do not have Wi‑Fi, Bluetooth, or any wireless devices in their house, arguing that there is no need for wireless technology to “ping” microwaves throughout the home. They reference a recurring claim that wireless technology is not microwaves, then respond by pointing to a book titled *The Zapping of America*, described as “microwaves and the deadly risk,” written by Paul B. They state that the book argues all wireless technology is microwaves and that it was created by Raytheon, citing the first cell phone and first wireless technology as being created by Raytheon. The speaker then claims that the Department of Defense wants people to have wireless technology in their houses because, they say, it “cooks them” and causes health issues including autoimmune issues, loss of smell, loss of taste, dizziness, and brain fog. They also claim that with wireless technology, people can “watch the people” and see what is in a house. The speaker recommends the book *The Zapping of America* by Paul Broder and suggests viewers look into Paul Broder, describing him as possibly French.

Speaker 0 argues that tin foil hats actually work and demonstrates how a small amount of aluminum foil can reduce RF electromagnetic fields (RFEMF) from a WiFi router. He shows a RFEMF meter reading standing a few feet away from the router, noting measurements between 100 and 200 microwatts per square meter. As he moves right up to the WiFi router, the reading climbs to over a million, sometimes 2,000,000 microwatts per square meter. He states that generally you want to be working and living in an environment that's less than a 100 or 200 microwatts per square meter. He shares that when he is sitting ten to fifteen feet away, the reading is 18,000 to 20,000 microwatts per square meter. He asserts that this is not an environment he wants to be working in all day. Mentioning that there is a lot of debate about RFEMF and its harm to humans, he says there are a significant number of studies suggesting that RFEMF from a WiFi router or your phone can affect human biology negatively. The proposed solution is to wrap the router with aluminum foil. He states, “Literally just wrap this around the WiFi router, and now you're officially a conspiracy theorist. It's modern art,” yet demonstrates the result. After wrapping around the router, the reading between 500 and 1,000 microwatts per square meter is observed, representing a 10- to 20-fold reduction. He notes that right before wrapping, the reading was 100,000 microwatts per square meter, and after wrapping it, the reading is five to 7,000 microwatts per square meter just in front of the router. He emphasizes that the router remains still very high right at the device, but that the levels are significantly lower throughout the rest of the house. He concludes by stating, “Tinfoil hats work. 5¢ of tinfoil on your WiFi router, something that's in every home, can significantly decrease your exposure throughout the day while you're working.” He ends by encouraging viewers to send this to somebody they know who works very close to a WiFi router.

The speaker expresses strong concern about five Gs towers, suggesting their worry is high (even implying a scale up to nine or ten). They state that calling it “five Gs” is a misnomer because it doesn’t tell you what’s wrong with EMFs. EMFs are bad depending on the pulse rates and the wavelengths, and some of them are very bad. They note that in Europe, regulations are an order of magnitude lower than what is allowed here. There are literally over 10,000 studies that document a number of ill effects, including cancer and tumor growth.

The speaker expresses concern about the dangers of 5G radiation, stating that it disrupts the blood-brain barrier and is linked to cancer. They mention winning a case on this issue in the Federal Court of Appeals. The speaker believes that 5G is under-regulated compared to other countries and calls for better protection, especially for children. They argue against placing antennas on elementary schools and advise against holding cell phones next to the head. The speaker claims that there is an epidemic of glioblastomas connected to cell phone use and mentions ongoing litigation. They reject the idea of blindly trusting experts, emphasizing the importance of individual research and questioning in a democracy.

Speaker 0 describes higher frequencies as potentially impacting bees and insects because the wave size can resonate with insect size, leading to greater absorption. He shows a study with heat-map images of higher frequencies on the honeybee, noting five insects were examined and bees at different life stages were tested; higher frequencies resonated with the bees and were more highly absorbed, potentially causing biochemical changes that can affect bee behavior. He notes other studies on their website showing impacts to honey production and bee reproduction, including cases where bees did not return to a hive when wireless radiation was near it. Speaker 1 states, “For decades, there has been irrefutable evidence that electromagnetic waves have an influence both thermally and non thermally on living beings, including people.” Speaker 2 adds that five g has triggered irrational fears, but experts are concerned, and Daniel Favre is among hundreds of scientists who think precautionary steps should be taken. Favre signed appeals to the United Nations and European Union asking for the health effects of it to be reassessed. Danielle has been looking into the impact of electromagnetic fields on honeybees for years. Speaker 1 elaborates: in a practical setup, a cell phone emits the waves while another phone receives the waves, and a device records the sound of the colony in the beehive via a microphone under the hive. The waveform thickening indicates greater colony sound intensity; when phones are active, the colony is disturbed, and once the phone is off, the colony returns to normal noise. Speaker 2 emphasizes that implementing five g safely for people and the environment requires more time for independent research and for digesting information from thousands of published papers, citing Enrico Stura, an electronic engineer specializing in molecular biophysics. Speaker 1 adds that “The electromagnetic waves produced by personal telecommunication systems during reasonable periods of time lead to demonstrable and proven DNA damages.” Speaker 0 references a study on radio frequency radiation injuries around mobile phone base stations, conducted as a field study for years, observing trees in line of sight of cell antennas showing damage that led to felled trees over time. He notes photographs showing the antenna and the crown fitting, and mentions studies on impacts to plants, stressing the broader concern about widespread antennas in Montgomery County, the United States, and the world.

Someone asked why I don't use Wi-Fi, which is often seen as convenient and effective. However, studies show that exposure to wireless frequencies can thicken blood and reduce oxygen levels. That's why I prefer a wired connection. I use a simple Ethernet cord connected to an adapter for my phone and computer. I plug the Ethernet into my router, disable Wi-Fi, and operate without it. This way, I avoid the microwave frequencies associated with Wi-Fi, which have been linked to health risks in numerous studies, despite claims of safety.

There are numerous studies highlighting the dangers of Wi-Fi radiation, particularly from routers. It's advised not to sleep near Wi-Fi devices or allow children to carry cell phones in bras or breast pockets. If necessary, phones should be kept in back pockets instead. Avoid holding phones near your head while sleeping; using speakerphone or earphones is recommended. Legal action has been taken against the FCC and FDA regarding this issue, with a court ruling in favor of raising awareness about the risks associated with Wi-Fi radiation.

My Wi-Fi router emits harmful radiation, with levels reaching 2,500,000 microwatts per meter squared when turned on. This can cause cancer and neurological issues. To reduce exposure, stay at least 10 feet away from the router. At 20 feet away, levels drop to 1,000 microwatts per meter squared. The safe zone is below 10 microwatts per meter squared.

The speaker introduces antennasearch.com to find cell phone towers near homes and suggests switching cell phones to LTE instead of 5G to boycott a system that is allegedly poisoning people. The speaker claims safety tests are inadequate and that the rapid rollout of 5G since 2020 is causing radio wave sickness, which was allegedly removed from medical books in the 1920s. Symptoms of radio wave sickness purportedly include fevers, chills, shortness of breath, fatigue, headaches, loss of smell, insomnia, pain in the chest, dizziness, muscle pain, hypertension, strokes, and thyroid issues. The speaker states that cell phone tower companies are immune to lawsuits and references a 1971 US Navy document that supposedly acknowledged the damages of this technology. The speaker eliminated WiFi, Bluetooth, and smart meters and now uses a wired internet connection.