TruthArchive.ai - Related Video Feed

So many people ask how to get rid of WiFi. Here’s the approach: get an Ethernet cord and a USB adapter. Log in to your router by going to the IP on the back of the box with whatever device you have. Find the wireless settings. You have guest WiFi, which you’re going to turn off, and 2.4 and 5 gigahertz bands, which you’re also going to turn off. Make sure all this is turned off. Then take that Ethernet cord and stick it into the back of your router. Next, take the other side of the Ethernet cord with the adapter and plug it into your computer, and wait for it. In about a second, you’ve got the Internet without WiFi. Why would you get rid of WiFi? Because of microwave sickness, headaches, dizziness, sleep issues, insomnia, fatigue, nausea, heart palpitations, memory loss, ringing of the ears, skin rashes, muscle and joint pain, leg and root pain, tingling, irritability, numbness, nosebleeds, depression, and anxiety. It doesn’t sound too safe. For reference, my phone’s on airplane mode right now to show everything’s off with an Ethernet cord. You can do it for your phones too. If you’ve got 5G, switch it to 4G or airplane mode. There will always be those who say it’s all safe, but the US Navy did 2,000 studies in 1971 on the dangers of wireless technology. And here’s what they found: depression, impotence, anxiety, lack of concentration, dizziness, sleepiness, insomnia, irritability, chest pain, and tremors. Probably a good idea to have wires. Last but not least, there’s a $13 book that’s 600 pages long on the topic, Things to Look Into.

- My concern about five g is that the RF radiation from five g is dangerous. - It penetrates the it it disrupts the blood brain barrier. - It also is associated with glioblastomas and other cancers. - And there are literally thousands and thousands of studies in that. - I've litigated on that issue, and I've won in the Federal Court of Appeals. - Other countries regulate it much better than us, and we need to protect our children. - We should not be having these antennas on elementary schools. - We should be warning people appropriately. - Do not put that cell phone next year ahead. - Oh, you know, we're we're seeing this epidemic now of glioblastomas, and almost all of them are connected to the year that you favor the cell phone with. - There are study after study that shows that, and I'm in litigation on that issue right now.

Speaker 0: You've heard me talk about the five g towers and how it's not for Internet at all. It's a microwave weapon developed by the military to be used on the citizens. Take a look at this video. Speaker 1: They started at 09:11 at night until 09:11 in the morning. You see the pulse going from the East to the West Coast. Alright. Boom. You see that? Those are NEXRAD stations. Each of those towers are 750 kilowatts, pumping out between 2.7 to 2.9 gigahertz in the microwave range. This is roughly the same frequency as your microwave oven. Speaker 0: Now there are tons and tons of whistleblowers coming out about this technology and how dangerous and damaging and deadly it is. This is not for Internet. You wanna know if it's true? Go right up to one of those damn towers and see how good your service is. It's still gonna suck. These things are not for Internet service or communications. It's a weapon. They are frying you with microwaves while you sleep. If you saw in the video, did you notice where it wasn't? Where they weren't microwaving the population while they slept? All the areas of the country that are the least populated. Is that by accident? Those microwaves just magically don't go to those certain areas of the country? No. There's no reason to do it there. There's very few people that live there compared to the populated areas of the country that have huge cities in them. That's where you notice they are microwaving you to death. Are you feeling sick? Are you feeling lethargic? You can't think straight. You're not sleeping well. You're having crazy dreams. All of this stuff is radiation poisoning. Look up the symptoms of radiation poisoning. You're gonna see they identically match a lot of your symptoms that you're having. Funny enough, it also matches a lot of the symptoms of COVID. Crazy how that works. So I'm telling you guys, you have got to understand what's happening. And they're talking about putting up four times the amount of towers in the next four years. Why would they need that? We can prove that it's not for Internet. It's not for cell phone service. So why? You need to start asking yourself, why are they putting these things up at an unprecedented rate and then lying to your face about what they're for? Reach out. Let's connect. Let's figure out the plan of how we stop this.

The speaker asserts that WiFi can cook the water in the body, despite conventional claims that it only heats water a little. The core idea is that WiFi signals have the potential to affect bodily water, including water in the eyes. If a home is not hardwired with an Ethernet connection and relies on WiFi, there are unwanted frequencies pulsing throughout the home. These pulsing frequencies, according to the speaker, can actually cook the water in the eyes. As a consequence, while people are performing detoxing, exercises, and efforts to restore balance of their eyes, they should also focus on getting rid of WiFi from their house. The speaker emphasizes that all spectrums of WiFi operate on the same spectrum as a microwave, specifically at 2.4 gigahertz. The speaker points out that microwaves are labeled 2.4, and WiFi uses 2.4 as well. According to the speaker, this constant pulsing throughout the house can slow down people’s repairing because the body is being bombarded by these signals. In summary, the speaker links WiFi exposure to potential effects on bodily water, including eye water, and argues for eliminating WiFi from the home to avoid continuous pulsing frequencies that purportedly interfere with the body's repair processes, reinforcing the claim by drawing a parallel between WiFi’s 2.4 GHz spectrum and microwave radiation.

To switch a phone from 5G to 4G, go to settings, then cellular data, and change the setting from 5G to LTE or 4G. According to the speaker, 5G is 300 times stronger than 4G and caused the 2020 pandemic. The speaker claims there are zero long-term studies of 5G. A senator questioned industry representatives about funding for 5G studies and was told there are no active industry-backed studies. The speaker suggests that people are the study and advises against using new technologies like AirPods and smartwatches. The speaker claims 5G is tested on plastic dummies and implies it is unsafe for humans.

The speaker discusses the difference in radiation exposure between Switzerland and the US, stating that the Swiss use significantly less radiation and have no excess deaths. They claim that 5G is a weapon of mass destruction and can cause mass casualties within minutes by depriving people of oxygen. The speaker emphasizes the need for understanding this technology and taking steps to protect oneself. They suggest taking back power and electing honest individuals to positions of authority while shutting down complicit agencies.

Speaker 0 describes smart meters in the context of a book, showing a plant and a smart meter, and notes that “that side's all cooked.” They claim that this illustrates what “they don’t tell people.” The speaker asserts that a smart meter catches fire and that a utility company denies homeowner damage claims, with insurance not covering fires. They reference “all these fires” and say there have been fires across the country linked to smart meters. They question how safety is tested, claiming that “this is a plastic dummy” and “that’s a phone” used to demonstrate safety, followed by the statement “And then what about plants exposed to Wi Fi? Look at this. No Wi Fi.” The speaker contrasts the apparent demonstration with alleged real-world risk to plants from wireless technology. The speaker adds a claim about the Navy, stating that it “knew 5,000 studies on the dangers of wireless technology.” They offer an example as “one good one” and connect Wi-Fi to thyroid issues, asserting “Thyroid issues, Wi Fi.”

The speaker demonstrates the levels of electromagnetic radiation emitted by various devices. They show that when the microwave is off, there is minimal radiation. However, when it is turned on, the levels increase significantly. They compare the radiation levels from using mobile data and Wi-Fi to being close to a microwave oven. The speaker also measures the radiation levels inside a car and finds that it is consistently high. They mention experiencing a headache after a test drive, attributing it to the constant exposure to radiation from mobile phones.

To switch from 5G to 4G, go to settings, then cellular data, and change the setting from 5G to LTE or 4G. According to the speaker, 5G is 300 times stronger than 4G and caused the 2020 pandemic. The speaker claims switching to 4G will alleviate headaches, improve sense of smell, and stop dizziness, hair loss, and heart palpitations. The speaker asserts there are zero long-term studies on 5G. A senator asked if there were any long-term studies of 5G before its rollout, and was told there are no industry-backed studies currently. The speaker concludes that the public is the study, and avoids new technologies like AirPods and smartwatches, because they believe the safety testing is inadequate.

Wi-Fi, being so prevalent, might be negatively impacting our health. I believe it degrades mitochondria and compromises the blood-brain barrier. I found an article suggesting radiofrequency radiation affects the blood-brain barrier's permeability and alters microRNA expression in the brain, potentially leading to neurodegenerative diseases. Research indicates this has been expanded on by researchers in China with a published article. They even call it leaky brain. It seems findings in the US were followed by suppression, misinformation, and a shutdown of government-funded research. It's the same old story.

The speaker believes 5G RF radiation is dangerous, disrupting the blood-brain barrier and causing glioblastomas, other cancers, and dramatic health effects. They claim there are thousands of studies supporting this and that they have litigated and won on this issue in the Federal Court of Appeals. They also won a case against Monsanto regarding glyphosate and Hodgkin's lymphoma, which was also called a conspiracy theory. The speaker asserts 5G is under-regulated in the US compared to other countries. They advocate for protecting children by not placing antennas on elementary schools and warning people about cell phone usage, citing an epidemic of glioblastomas linked to the ear favored for cell phone use. They state there are many studies showing this and that they are currently in litigation on this issue.

Speaker 0 says that at the lows people are buying incandescent bulbs because of a new ban, and it is important to stock up on these bulbs. Incandescent bulbs are described as very natural to our eyes, and it is emphasized that one should put incandescent bulbs into the home and not LEDs. The speaker claims the problem with LED lights is that they burn out the back of the eye, which “causes cataracts,” and that smart bulbs and devices connected to WiFi ping radiation to the skull while plugged in. Therefore, the advice is to avoid anything with LED and anything that's smart—specifically, smart remote, smart sensors, smart plugs, and smart bulbs. The speaker notes that these are all LED lights installed in the hardware store. Additionally, the speaker urges avoiding anything with Bluetooth built in because Bluetooth operates at the same frequency as a microwave. The overall message is that many marketing tactics push the new bulbs, but one should stick to incandescent bulbs.

In the video, Speaker 0 explains that LED lights are being pushed aggressively, even given away for free, because they will connect everything in the Internet of Things. These LED lights can be connected to a cellphone, a tablet, all home appliances, the thermostat, cars, the garage, and more, allowing monitoring and data collection from these devices. They can also be used to turn off devices based on climate reasons and other factors, meaning you are connected up to the Internet of Things. What’s interesting, according to the speaker, is that these LED lights “ping a lot of microwave radiation,” which will be demonstrated in the next video. The speaker describes using a TriField EMF tester to check the radiation coming off the LED lights and shows results labeled as “off the charts.” The claim is that by bringing these lights into the home, microwave radiation is being pinged into the house. The speaker asserts that this microwave radiation can impact health, listing effects on the heart, brain, eyes, skin, and other organs. The LED lights’ capability to connect to the Internet of Things is highlighted again as part of this scenario. The video then notes a claim about a 2016 announcement from the AMA, stating that LED lights can increase the risk of cataracts and eye degeneration, implying long-term harm to eyesight while allegedly promoting environmental aims. In summary, the narrator claims: - LED lights are being pushed and given away because they enable the Internet of Things, connecting to smartphones, tablets, home appliances, thermostats, cars, and garages for monitoring and control. - These LEDs allegedly “ping a lot of microwave radiation,” detectable with an EMF tester, described as “off the charts.” - The radiation entering the home is claimed to impact health, including the heart, brain, eyes, skin, and other organs, in addition to enabling IoT connectivity. - The speaker cites a 2016 AMA statement asserting that LED lights can increase the risk of cataracts and eye degeneration.

People can create energy weapons using a microwave oven by opening it and pointing it through walls, causing harm to neighbors. Microwaves emit radiation that can make people sick. The speaker warns against using microwaves for cooking due to health risks, citing research on digestive tract cancer. AirPods Pro emit similar levels of radiation as microwaves, posing potential health concerns. The speaker advises against consuming microwaved food and recommends avoiding restaurants that use microwaves for cooking.

Speaker 0: So many people ask how to get rid of Wi Fi. So what you're gonna do, you're gonna get an Ethernet cord and a USB adapter like that. Next, what you're gonna do is you're gonna log in to your router. So you're gonna go to the back of the box. You're gonna find an IP on there. You're gonna log in to your router on whatever device you have, and then you're gonna find all these wireless settings. So you have guest WiFi, which you're gonna turn off 2.4, five gigahertz. You're also gonna turn off all your regular wireless. Make sure all this is turned off. Now you're gonna take that Ethernet cord that you bought, and you're gonna stick it into the back of your router. And then next, what you're gonna do is you're gonna take the other side of the Ethernet cord with the adapter, stick it right into your computer, and you're gonna wait for it. And then in about a second, you got the Internet without Wi Fi. Now someone's gonna ask, well, why did you get rid of Wi Fi? Well, microwave sickness, headaches, dizziness, sleep issues, insomnia, fatigue, nausea, heart palpitations, memory loss, ringing of the ears, skin rashes, muscle and joint pain, leg and root pain, tingling, irritability, numbness, nosebleeds, depression, and anxiety. Doesn't sound too safe. And just for the record, my phone's on airplane mode right now and see how everything's off with an Ethernet cord. You can do it for your phones too. And if you got five g, turn it to four g or airplane mode. And there'll always be those Muppets who just say it's all safe, but the US Navy did 2,000 studies in 1971 on the dangers of wireless technology. So it's been known. And here's what they found, depression, impotence, anxiety, lack of concentration, dizziness, sleepiness, insomnia, irritability, chest pain, and tremors. Probably a good idea to have wires. And last but not least, here's a $13 book that's 600 pages long on the topic. Things to look into.

Speaker 0 argues that tin foil hats actually work and demonstrates how a small amount of aluminum foil can reduce RF electromagnetic fields (RFEMF) from a WiFi router. He shows a RFEMF meter reading standing a few feet away from the router, noting measurements between 100 and 200 microwatts per square meter. As he moves right up to the WiFi router, the reading climbs to over a million, sometimes 2,000,000 microwatts per square meter. He states that generally you want to be working and living in an environment that's less than a 100 or 200 microwatts per square meter. He shares that when he is sitting ten to fifteen feet away, the reading is 18,000 to 20,000 microwatts per square meter. He asserts that this is not an environment he wants to be working in all day. Mentioning that there is a lot of debate about RFEMF and its harm to humans, he says there are a significant number of studies suggesting that RFEMF from a WiFi router or your phone can affect human biology negatively. The proposed solution is to wrap the router with aluminum foil. He states, “Literally just wrap this around the WiFi router, and now you're officially a conspiracy theorist. It's modern art,” yet demonstrates the result. After wrapping around the router, the reading between 500 and 1,000 microwatts per square meter is observed, representing a 10- to 20-fold reduction. He notes that right before wrapping, the reading was 100,000 microwatts per square meter, and after wrapping it, the reading is five to 7,000 microwatts per square meter just in front of the router. He emphasizes that the router remains still very high right at the device, but that the levels are significantly lower throughout the rest of the house. He concludes by stating, “Tinfoil hats work. 5¢ of tinfoil on your WiFi router, something that's in every home, can significantly decrease your exposure throughout the day while you're working.” He ends by encouraging viewers to send this to somebody they know who works very close to a WiFi router.

The speaker expresses strong concern about five Gs towers, suggesting their worry is high (even implying a scale up to nine or ten). They state that calling it “five Gs” is a misnomer because it doesn’t tell you what’s wrong with EMFs. EMFs are bad depending on the pulse rates and the wavelengths, and some of them are very bad. They note that in Europe, regulations are an order of magnitude lower than what is allowed here. There are literally over 10,000 studies that document a number of ill effects, including cancer and tumor growth.

The speaker expresses concern about the dangers of 5G radiation, stating that it disrupts the blood-brain barrier and is linked to cancer. They mention winning a case on this issue in the Federal Court of Appeals. The speaker believes that 5G is under-regulated compared to other countries and calls for better protection, especially for children. They argue against placing antennas on elementary schools and advise against holding cell phones next to the head. The speaker claims that there is an epidemic of glioblastomas connected to cell phone use and mentions ongoing litigation. They reject the idea of blindly trusting experts, emphasizing the importance of individual research and questioning in a democracy.

I spoke with Barry Trower, an expert on microwave radiation, who believes it is dangerous. He mentioned that microwave radiation can be used for various purposes, including healing and destructive actions like geoengineering and mind control. Trower even claimed that microwave radiation could potentially manipulate people into committing violent acts. He also discussed the potential interaction between microwave radiation, specifically 5G, and the injection of Graphene oxide into our bodies. The presence of numerous 5G and 4G towers, each with significant power, allows for the coverage of large areas and the ability to direct power to other antennas, such as Graphene oxide.

Speaker 0 describes higher frequencies as potentially impacting bees and insects because the wave size can resonate with insect size, leading to greater absorption. He shows a study with heat-map images of higher frequencies on the honeybee, noting five insects were examined and bees at different life stages were tested; higher frequencies resonated with the bees and were more highly absorbed, potentially causing biochemical changes that can affect bee behavior. He notes other studies on their website showing impacts to honey production and bee reproduction, including cases where bees did not return to a hive when wireless radiation was near it. Speaker 1 states, “For decades, there has been irrefutable evidence that electromagnetic waves have an influence both thermally and non thermally on living beings, including people.” Speaker 2 adds that five g has triggered irrational fears, but experts are concerned, and Daniel Favre is among hundreds of scientists who think precautionary steps should be taken. Favre signed appeals to the United Nations and European Union asking for the health effects of it to be reassessed. Danielle has been looking into the impact of electromagnetic fields on honeybees for years. Speaker 1 elaborates: in a practical setup, a cell phone emits the waves while another phone receives the waves, and a device records the sound of the colony in the beehive via a microphone under the hive. The waveform thickening indicates greater colony sound intensity; when phones are active, the colony is disturbed, and once the phone is off, the colony returns to normal noise. Speaker 2 emphasizes that implementing five g safely for people and the environment requires more time for independent research and for digesting information from thousands of published papers, citing Enrico Stura, an electronic engineer specializing in molecular biophysics. Speaker 1 adds that “The electromagnetic waves produced by personal telecommunication systems during reasonable periods of time lead to demonstrable and proven DNA damages.” Speaker 0 references a study on radio frequency radiation injuries around mobile phone base stations, conducted as a field study for years, observing trees in line of sight of cell antennas showing damage that led to felled trees over time. He notes photographs showing the antenna and the crown fitting, and mentions studies on impacts to plants, stressing the broader concern about widespread antennas in Montgomery County, the United States, and the world.

Someone asked why I don't use Wi-Fi, which is often seen as convenient and effective. However, studies show that exposure to wireless frequencies can thicken blood and reduce oxygen levels. That's why I prefer a wired connection. I use a simple Ethernet cord connected to an adapter for my phone and computer. I plug the Ethernet into my router, disable Wi-Fi, and operate without it. This way, I avoid the microwave frequencies associated with Wi-Fi, which have been linked to health risks in numerous studies, despite claims of safety.

There are numerous studies highlighting the dangers of Wi-Fi radiation, particularly from routers. It's advised not to sleep near Wi-Fi devices or allow children to carry cell phones in bras or breast pockets. If necessary, phones should be kept in back pockets instead. Avoid holding phones near your head while sleeping; using speakerphone or earphones is recommended. Legal action has been taken against the FCC and FDA regarding this issue, with a court ruling in favor of raising awareness about the risks associated with Wi-Fi radiation.

My Wi-Fi router emits harmful radiation, with levels reaching 2,500,000 microwatts per meter squared when turned on. This can cause cancer and neurological issues. To reduce exposure, stay at least 10 feet away from the router. At 20 feet away, levels drop to 1,000 microwatts per meter squared. The safe zone is below 10 microwatts per meter squared.

Speaker 0 urges switching from five g to four g: "Takes less than five seconds. I guarantee you'll start feeling better." He asserts benefits and adds: "You won't have headaches. You won't be dizzy anymore. Have your hair falling out anymore and suffering from heart palpitations because five g is 300 times stronger than four g, and that's what caused the pandemic of twenty twenty." He states: "there are zero long term studies of five g. Zero." He asks: "There were people who testified in front of congress and asked them, do you have any long term studies of five g before you roll this out?" Speaker 1 replies: "There are no industry back studies to my knowledge right now. Happy to visit with you... we're always for more science. We also rely on what the scientists tell us." Speaker 0: "So essentially, the answer to my question, how much money? Zero." Speaker 1: "No active studies being backed by industry today." Speaker 0 concludes: "So guess who's the study? You. That's why I don't use any of the new stuff... AirPods and smartwatches..."

The speaker introduces antennasearch.com to find cell phone towers near homes and suggests switching cell phones to LTE instead of 5G to boycott a system that is allegedly poisoning people. The speaker claims safety tests are inadequate and that the rapid rollout of 5G since 2020 is causing radio wave sickness, which was allegedly removed from medical books in the 1920s. Symptoms of radio wave sickness purportedly include fevers, chills, shortness of breath, fatigue, headaches, loss of smell, insomnia, pain in the chest, dizziness, muscle pain, hypertension, strokes, and thyroid issues. The speaker states that cell phone tower companies are immune to lawsuits and references a 1971 US Navy document that supposedly acknowledged the damages of this technology. The speaker eliminated WiFi, Bluetooth, and smart meters and now uses a wired internet connection.