TruthArchive.ai - Related Video Feed

The Fifth Column published findings on self-assembling nanotech discovered in Pfizer mRNA vaccines via optical microscopy. They claim the objects found correspond with known items in the scientific record, concluding that nanotechnology is being deployed in COVID-19 vaccines to form networks capable of controlling nanomachines. This is described as the most intrusive assault against humanity in recorded history. The official ingredients are unknown, but scientists' work indicates graphene oxide is a key component. Studies document graphene oxide's use as a power converter, converting gigahertz to terahertz, which is what these nanomachines need for power. The optimal frequency to externally power graphene is 26 gigahertz, which is also the frequency put out by 5G. In this model, graphene within the body is activated by microwave signals in the gigahertz range, boosted into the terahertz range, and then powers the nanotech machinery to self-assemble.

If a genetic sequence is injected that causes the body to manufacture a foreign protein, the body recognizes it as an invasion and launches an attack on cells. This autoimmune reaction can occur anywhere the injection lands, potentially causing myocarditis or a heart attack if it lands in the heart, stroke or neurological conditions if in the brain, blindness if in the eyes, or sterilization if in the ovaries. The body is being made to manufacture something that does not belong in it. The speaker believes the so-called vaccines encode spike proteins, which are acutely toxic to blood cells, prompting blood clots, and to nerve cells, causing them to malfunction. The body is forced to make something directly toxic, intentionally. The injectables are wrapped in lipid nanoparticles.

I have an internal Pfizer document from a source who reverse-engineered the BioNTech Pfizer SARS COVID-2 vaccine. This document reveals the precise chemical and biological processes used to create an mRNA that contains graphene oxide, a dangerous toxin. Each vaccine contains 15 billion nanoparticles or lipid carrier particles within the mRNA sequence. Once injected, the spike protein binds to blood cells, and graphene oxide begins building a structure, leading to blood clots and heart failure. Patent databases and recovered, deleted Wuhan databases prove that COVID-19 and its vaccines are bioweapons.

Scientists in Spain, including Professor Compra, discovered oxide Graphene and nanoparticles in the COVID-19 vaccine. Professor Arne Burkart also confirmed the presence of oxide Graphene, parasites, metal particles, and an RFID-like component. Additionally, whistleblowers Dr. Nagazi and Dr. Monteverde revealed that the vaccine lacks biological elements like Phosphor and Nitrogen, suggesting it is synthetic nanotech. The exact nature of the mRNA in the vaccine remains unclear. Given the uncertain and concerning situation, it is important to remain open-minded in order to address and treat people effectively.

Speaker 0 asserts that the design of the molecular structures in vaccines and injections has no purpose other than to injure and kill. Drawing on 30 years of experience in rational drug design, they say every component in a vial is chosen by someone with specific objectives (e.g., how quickly absorbed, how long it lasts, where it distributes in the body) and that these components are not random or natural products. They declare the ingredients to be toxic by design and intentionally harmful. This, they claim, fits with what they call “the lie” about the pandemic, arguing there wasn’t a real pandemic. According to Speaker 0, the pandemic’s purpose was to damage the economy, train people to comply under a mock emergency, and compel people to get vaccinated. They warn that if people do nothing, speak up less, and simply follow directives, they will lose their freedom and then their lives. They allege that a self-appointed group of very rich people desires a much smaller global population than 8,000,000,000 people, and they claim to be able to deduce the script behind these events. The speaker urges listeners to start talking to anyone and everyone relentlessly, insisting that this situation is not going away. They warn that without protest and refusal, people will first lose their freedom and then their lives.

"Inert should mean that the substance does not cause a chemical or biological reaction in the body." "Paul Offit routinely calls mercury and aluminum inert even though they are known neurotoxicants." "Philip Grandjean and Philip Langegon, they're the best two toxicologists in the world. They published a study in 2014 that says both aluminum and ethyl mercury are known neurotoxicants." "In the context of vaccines, placebo should mean saline as verified by independent third party testing." "FDA has no regulations concerning the contents of placebos." "manufacturers can put whatever they want into the comparator intervention and can still call it a placebo by law." "A double blind randomized controlled trial should have two groups." "That's not what the supporters of the status quo mean when they say randomized control trial." "That's why we're in this mess. That's why we have an autism and chronic disease epidemic in this country."

Pfizer's internal document reveals the manipulation of chemical and biological processes in the BioNTech Pfizer SARS CoV-2 vaccine. It discloses the presence of Graphene Oxide, a dangerous toxin, in each 30 milligram shot, containing 15 billion nanoparticles. Graphene Oxide causes the formation of structures in the body, leading to blood clots and sudden heart failure. Access to deleted Wuhan databases supports the claim that COVID-19 and its vaccines are bioweapons.

- Humanity is allegedly at a stage similar to the time of Noah, with the unvaccinated being the only "pure" humans with unaltered DNA. - Supreme Court has allegedly ruled that vaccinated people are patented goods, no longer human, and transhuman, without natural person rights. This applies worldwide under US patent law since 2013. - Nanotechnology is allegedly being deployed in COVID-19 vaccines to form networks capable of controlling nanomachines within living human beings. - Graphene oxide is allegedly a key component, activated by microwave signals, boosting frequencies to power nanotech machinery for self-assembly. - COVID-19 vaccines allegedly contain graphene oxide, which builds structures when spike proteins bind to blood cells, causing blood clots and heart failure. - Internal Pfizer document allegedly outlines the manipulation of mRNA to contain graphene oxide, with 15 billion nanoparticles per shot. - Rain and snow samples show extremely high levels of aluminum, indicating a threat from global geoengineering programs. - COVID-19 was never about a virus, but about getting W band wireless body area network and sensors in bodies with nodes. - Second wave will be from vaccine induced injury, compounded by fear and the introduction of 5G technology. - Nanosensors were allegedly embedded in people's cartilage during COVID tests.

I have an internal document from Pfizer Laboratories that reveals the manipulation of chemical and biological processes in the BioNTech Pfizer SARS CoV-2 vaccine. It contains Graphene Oxide, a dangerous toxin, with 15 billion nanoparticles in each 30mg shot. Graphene Oxide causes the spike protein to bind to blood cells, leading to blood clots and heart failure. The patent databases and a copy of the deleted Wuhan databases support the claim that COVID-19 and its vaccines are bioweapons.

Recent findings reveal self-assembling nanotechnology in Pfizer's mRNA vaccines, suggesting a goal to use this technology in humans to create networks controlling nanomachines. This is seen as a significant threat to humanity. While the media and government may obscure the truth, thousands of scientists are investigating these experimental vaccines, with some findings indicating that graphene oxide is a crucial component. Graphene, a strong and conductive material, can enhance frequencies needed for powering nanotech. The optimal frequency for activating graphene is 26 gigahertz, coinciding with 5G signals. In this scenario, graphene in the body is activated by microwave signals, boosting them to power nanotech machinery that self-assembles within humans.

The 5th column discovered self-assembling nanotech in Pfizer's mRNA vaccines, suggesting a plan to control humans using nanotechnology. Graphene oxide is a key component, activated by 5G frequencies to power nanotech machinery within the body. These nanotech machines create an internal electronic system for biomanipulation. Graphene oxide in the vaccines causes similar side effects to known Graphene oxide effects, including blood clots and heart conditions. The vaccines are part of a mass experiment with potentially deadly consequences, possibly aiming to control or harm humans. This information was reported by Greg Reese for Infowars.

I have an internal document from Pfizer Laboratories that reveals the manipulation of chemical and biological processes in the development of the Pfizer SARS-CoV-2 vaccine. The document states that the vaccine contains Graphene Oxide, a dangerous toxin, with 15 billion nanoparticles in a 30 milligram shot. When Graphene Oxide enters the body, it forms structures that lead to blood clots and heart failure. Additionally, we have accessed patent databases and a copy of the deleted Wuhan databases, which support the claim that COVID-19 and its vaccines are bioweapons.

I have an internal document from Pfizer Labs detailing the BioNTech Pfizer SARS COVID 2 vaccine, revealing it contains Graphene Oxide. Each shot has 15 billion nanoparticles causing blood clots and heart failure. The vaccine is considered a bioweapon, supported by deleted Wuhan databases.

After obtaining unrefrigerated samples of Pfizer and Moderna vaccines, an honors graduate with a Bachelor's of Science degree from McGill University analyzed them. The speaker notes that refrigeration temperatures are supposed to be minus 40 for Moderna and minus 70 for Pfizer. The Moderna sample revealed chip-like shapes with a grid pattern on top of crystal structures. The most prevalent element in the square was carbon, followed by oxygen. The Pfizer sample contained thousands of small squares made of carbon, oxygen, and possibly hydrogen, with no signs of biologic material. Fiber-like structures were also observed in the Pfizer sample, composed purely of carbon. The speaker questions the presence and purpose of these structures, suggesting they may be related to graphene. They raise concerns about the potential for these structures to self-assemble inside people's bodies using available carbon and oxygen, and the potential long-term effects of these structures forming in the blood.

Speaker 0 and Speaker 1 discuss the COVID-19 vaccine episode, challenging why the vaccine was pursued as a public health solution and exploring deeper incentives behind the program. - A knowledgeable figure at the stand answered a burning question: did they know the vaccine wouldn’t be effective from the start and could be dangerous? The answer given was that it was “a test of a technology.” The exchange suggests the broader aim was testing an entire program of control previewed in Event 2019. - They ask whether inoculation was necessary on billions, noting it could have been tested on a much smaller population. If shots had been basically empty or inert, the data could have been spun to claim success and end the pandemic, preventing injuries from appearing. The absence of that approach remains a mystery. - The speakers point to high pre-vaccine seroprevalence in 2020, including studies from South Dakota showing 50-60% seroprevalence before vaccine release, implying that a saline shot or no shot could have achieved “indomicity” (immunity) without a vaccine. - They discuss why people might fear vaccines and interpret the broader impact: the public is waking up to something terrible having occurred, as it revealed readiness to lie, potential data quality concerns, and risk to pregnant women and healthy children who might get little justification for risk. - The disease’s lethality is framed as greatest among the very old or very sick; for others, it was less deadly, with natural evolution potentially reducing vulnerability over time. - The mRNA platform was touted as a means to outrun mutations, but the timeline to release was still insufficient to stay ahead of natural change. They note accelerated development was the fastest vaccine in history, from detection to inoculation, reducing the timeline by about a year or two, yet not fast enough. - Political and logistical factors delayed release; there is mention that it would not have appeared under Trump and that Eric Topol argued to delay the rollout. Fauci reportedly sent Moderna back to trials due to insufficient racial diversity in participants. - The discussion questions whether the vaccine qualifies as a normal consumer product, given ongoing subsidies, mandates, indemnifications, wartime-like supports, and propaganda. They wonder if there has been an ongoing two-century revolt by industry against public scrutiny, with public interest repeatedly leading to pushback and rebranding. - A central theme is the sophistication of pharma: the “game of pharma” involves owning an IP-based health claim, crafting supportive research, convincing it is safe and effective, achieving standard-of-care status, securing mandates and government funding, and leveraging ongoing propaganda. They describe pharma as a long-running arms race with deep institutional knowledge, implying that it is far more capable of shaping reality than the public realizes.

The speakers discuss a broad denial about vaccine injuries and the idea that, despite evidence, the medical establishment and political figures push the narrative that vaccines are safe and effective. They claim that many people who are vaccinated want to move on and avoid acknowledging serious side effects, including turbo cancers, undetected myocarditis, and neurological issues, and that autoimmune disease is being attributed to other causes. They argue that the medical establishment, federal health agencies, and some members of Congress who produce supportive content, such as segments like Steve Colbert’s, advocate for taking the shot. They question how many people were killed or died from the shot, asserting that Bayer’s data shows “close[ly]” to thirty-nine thousand worldwide, and that if only ten percent are reported, the true number would be in the hundreds of thousands. They claim there are millions of adverse events, but that this is denied and covered up. The speakers contend that the shot was not a real vaccine. They describe it as gene therapy rather than a traditional vaccine. They explain a sequence in which a vaccine is typically an attenuated or killed virus that requires adjuvants like aluminum or mercury to stimulate the immune system, because the attenuated or killed virus may not work well on its own. In contrast, they say this shot is mRNA, which is modified so it does not degrade. They describe how it is put into a lipid nanoparticle designed to permeate barriers like the blood-brain barrier, and they assert it would never stay in the arm, distributing all over the body. They claim the lipid nanoparticle allows the mRNA to enter cells, hijack cellular structures, and cause the cells to express spike protein, which the body then attacks as foreign. When asked who is responsible, they reference a “doctor Frankenstein” figure and name Francis Collins, head of the NIH, and Anthony Fauci as possible figures in question. The response indicates that while they consider all of them criminally liable, they would say it is primarily Fauci, with acknowledgment that people like Collins are implicated as well.

The speaker discusses the severe damage caused by multiple doses of a certain substance, suggesting that taking it once is enough. They mention leaked documents from Pfizer and Moderna, revealing different lot numbers and formulations. The FDA's role is to ensure uniformity and safety across the country, but the speaker claims that different concentrations and ingredients were used, resulting in varying effects. Some lots were found to be 5000% more lethal than others. The speaker suggests that this variation was intentional to prevent clear correlation and discourage people from realizing they were being poisoned.

In my first interview with Stu Peters, I revealed that manufacturing facilities in China were producing excipients for COVID-19 injections worldwide, including Pfizer's ALC 0135 and ALC 159, which contained graphene oxide. Despite gaining millions of views, the mainstream media immediately dismissed the presence of graphene oxide in the injections. False reports claimed that some vaccines were 99% graphene oxide, but this has not been verified or peer-reviewed. However, Pfizer's internal documents and peer-reviewed publication confirm the use of graphene oxide in their nanoparticle technologies and spike proteins. The process involves infecting human embryonic kidney cells, which produce multi-species proteins with genetic sequences from non-human DNA. These proteins are then combined with a thin layer of graphene oxide.

Dr. Yeason presents three principal assertions about the vaccines. 1) The first principle: we were told these molecules were gene sequences that encoded something called the spike protein. The spike protein is described as on the outside of the virus, and vaccines were said to encode the protein to train the immune system. Dr. Yeason explains that the immune system treats anything foreign as a threat and will attack cells that manufacture a foreign protein, leading to tissue damage. He notes that this principle of “self, non self” and tissue targeting is fundamental to organ transplantation and autoimmune diseases, and says this was designed into every company’s molecule (Moderna, Pfizer, Johnson & Johnson, AstraZeneca). He asserts that by 2020 he knew these were designed to cause injury. 2) The second principle: what was encoded is the spike protein. He states he did not know what spike protein was at first, but describes spikes on the outside of the virus and claims they are known toxins (neurotoxins, cardiotoxins) that prompt blood coagulation. He questions why a medicinal product would encode something that would harm the body when expressed. 3) The third principle: lipid nanoparticles (LNPs) used to formulate two of the Pfizer and Moderna products. He explains that lipid nanoparticles are toxic in general and are known to promote uptake of their payload into visceral organs, especially the liver and ovaries. He asserts that when injected into women and girls, these materials would travel through the body, concentrate in reproductive organs, be expressed, be recognized as foreign, and kill those cells. He asks what possible motivation there could be for using that formulation when other options exist. This, he says, confirms that the first two observations were not mere risks but intentional design. Dr. Yeason concludes that these three points together indicate that someone in a room designed injections to injure, kill, and reduce fertility in the people given them, aiming to lower fertility and reduce the population over time. He states he has observed this “all around me for five years since that moment.”

The speaker presents microscopic images of the Pfizer BioNTech COVID-19 injection, claiming that at 100x magnification, self-assembling microchips are visible. These microchips allegedly emit a MAC address. The speaker identifies flashing dots as nano and micro robots communicating via light signals, collaborating to assemble microchips, which they describe as self-assembling nanotechnology. They claim to have observed similar swarming activity in human blood. Analysis of the COVID-19 injection purportedly revealed 54 undeclared chemical elements, including fluorescent graphene oxide. The speaker also presents images of embalmed blood from a vaccinated individual deceased for 8 months, noting filaments and micelles filled with blinking lights similar to those observed in the COVID shots, suggesting ongoing self-assembly.

The Fifth Column claims optical microscopy analysis reveals self-assembling nanotech in Pfizer's mRNA vaccines, aligning with the scientific goal of using nanotechnology to form control networks within living humans. They assert this constitutes an unprecedented assault on humanity. Graphene oxide is identified as a key component, acting as a power converter. Graphene, activated by gigahertz frequencies like 5G (specifically 26 GHz), boosts these to terahertz to power nanomachines that self-assemble within the body. These machines allegedly form an internal electronic system with biomanipulation potential, including nanorouters emitting MAC addresses, nano antennas, nano rectennas, codecs, and logic gates. The speaker claims graphene oxide side effects mirror COVID-19 vaccine side effects: magnetic properties, especially around the injection site, heart, and brain; immune response leading to paralysis and stroke; blood clots; heart conditions; and cardiac arrhythmia. The speaker concludes that the COVID vaccines are a mass experiment with certain batches being more deadly than others, and some containing nanotech intended to control the human host.

The speakers describe a crisis parallel to biblical times, asserting that humanity is currently at a Noah-like stage where the Nephilim altered humanity. They claim that the only pure humans left are the unvaccinated, defined as having DNA unaltered by man’s science, and that those who have been vaccinated have allowed “new Nimrods” to change their DNA, making their bodies no longer the same. Several participants present alleged scientific observations and tests. One speaker says they have washed slides and recreated findings showing anomalies in nearly everyone, including themselves, now appearing in blood samples. They describe red blood cells becoming irregular and forming masses that allegedly morph into something else, suggesting a process linked to decomposition and implying an ongoing transformation in vaccinated individuals. A separate visual account is presented as “a photo of a normal cell” versus “after the injection,” where white nanoparticles allegedly flood in, the cells lose their normal round shape, and the cells become covered with lumps and protrusions. This is framed as an intentional world war on human blood. There is also a claim involving a US Supreme Court ruling. The speakers assert that the Supreme Court has ruled that vaccinated people worldwide are “products, patented goods according to US law,” modified by DNA or RNA vaccination, rendering them no longer human and transhuman. They quote or reference a link to a Supreme Court document and discuss the idea that a modified genome is patentable and that vaccinated individuals are categorized as chattel property with no human rights. They explain that the court’s holding indicates a synthetic genome created by mRNA could be patented, and they tie this to vaccines, arguing that mRNA vaccines modify the genome. Further, claims are made about nanotechnology in vaccines. They reference the Fifth Column publishing findings about self-assembling nanotech in Pfizer’s vaccine, arguing that graphene oxide is a key component and that it powers nanomachines by converting gigahertz-frequency signals to terahertz-range power, activated by 26 gigahertz signals such as those emitted by 5G. This is said to enable self-assembly of nanotech within the body, forming networks to control nanomachines. Several participants discuss the broader implications: that graphene oxide enables power transfer, that microwaves and wireless signals power these nanotech constructs, and that this constitutes the most intrusive assault against humanity in recorded history. They claim nanoparticles number in the billions within each vaccine, contribute to blood clots and heart failure, and relate this to bioweapon theories and geoengineering concerns. There are also warnings about environmental exposure: claims about high aluminum levels in rain and snow, suggesting pervasive metal contamination, and assertions that geoengineering programs pose a severe threat to all life. One speaker reiterates the Noah/Nephilim theme, concluding that if you have been vaccinated, you have allowed DNA changes, and your body will never be the same.

Nicholas Holcher, an epidemiologist and foundation administrator at the McCullough Foundation, appears on the WiderWake Media Podcast to discuss what he calls harms from the mRNA COVID vaccines and to critique mainstream approaches to the pandemic and public health policy. - Vaccine definitions and mRNA technology - Pre-2000 definition: a vaccine is an injectable or oral product that introduces a killed part of a virus or an inactivated form to the body so that encountering a wild-type version would not infect or would cause a less severe illness. - He asserts that mRNA injections are not vaccines: they are a gene transfer platform using modified messenger RNA with long persistence in the body (via N1-methylpseudouridine), delivered in lipid nanoparticles. He claims these bubbles distribute systemically, including to the brain, heart, bone marrow, and reproductive system, and that they instruct cells to produce a spike protein, effectively turning organs into “toxic spike protein production factories.” He says this leads to autoimmune attack on those tissues and contributes to adverse events, including myocarditis, strokes, immune destruction, and “turbo cancers.” - History and purpose of mRNA in vaccines - According to Holcher, work on this technology existed for decades but animals testing showed high mortality or sterilization in ferrets and mice, preventing approval except under a declared global emergency. He contends the COVID-19 crisis enabled emergency use authorization across Western countries, with ulterior aims to inject the globe with mRNA technology. - Global impact and uptake - He estimates about 70% of the global population received at least one COVID-19 injection (mRNA or viral vector). He notes Eastern countries used non-mRNA platforms (e.g., AstraZeneca/J&J in some places; Sinovac elsewhere) but that uptake in the West was high. - Harms and evidence - Excess deaths: cites a study by Dennis Brancourt et al. estimating around 17 million deaths worldwide as a result of COVID injections (as of September 2023); he claims US deaths could be in the hundreds of thousands to millions. - Turbo cancers: cites multiple studies in 2023 showing increased risk of seven cancer types (colorectal, bladder, breast, thyroid, prostate, etc.) in vaccinated groups; cites a major cancer journal, OncoTarget, reporting hundreds of turbo cancer cases across 27 countries, with Pfizer contributing most cases. Holcher also mentions his own group’s work with Neo7 Bioscience documenting genomic integration of vaccine-derived mRNA in a stage IV bladder cancer patient (31-year-old woman) with a segment of mRNA found in circulating tumor DNA on chromosome 19; another study reported thousands of dysregulated genes in post-vaccine cancers, including p53, KRAS, and BRCA. - Definition of turbo cancer: per Merrick et al., rapid, aggressive tumor progression with sudden onset and early metastasis, often in younger individuals, and resistant to treatment. - Fertility, pregnancy, and autism - Fertility: cites studies suggesting fertility impacts, including Karaman et al. finding depletion of primordial follicles in rats after mRNA vaccination; Manichi et al. reporting 33% lower conception rates in vaccinated women in Denmark; a study indicating a ~20% drop in sperm concentration and motility with no recovery over five months. - Autism: asserts a large body of evidence linking vaccines to neurodevelopmental disorders, citing a 136-study review with 107 studies finding positive associations between vaccines and neurodevelopmental issues, including autism, attributed to toxicity and immune system disruption, particularly in children with high vaccine exposure and reduced detox capacity (CYP450 impairment). - Other topics tied to vaccines and public response - The COVID-19 period and vaccine skepticism: claims the pandemic catalyzed a large anti-vaccine movement because people were compelled to take an experimental gene therapy product. - Sam Altman and gene editing: discusses Altman’s Preventive venture with the aim to reduce heritable diseases via in utero gene editing but warns of the path to designer babies and the potential for harm in early-iteration edits, citing prior CRISPR experiments on human embryos that produced deformed offspring or nonviable results. - AI, workers, and future society: predicts two-tier society with implanted or enhanced individuals and a replacement of human labor by robots and AI systems; discusses military and surveillance ambitions in gene editing and AI augmentation. - Mental health and digital life: references a randomized trial showing that turning off mobile Internet improved depression scores and well-being to an extent comparable to or greater than antidepressants. - World Health Organization (WHO): notes the US has pulled out of the WHO, arguing this is good for the US but potentially harmful for others still in the organization; expresses concerns about the pandemic treaty and ongoing global health governance, including vaccine passport-style surveillance. - FDA and public health policy: acknowledges some shifts (e.g., cutting doses from the childhood schedule) but argues the FDA remains compromised and too aligned with vaccine industry interests; criticizes the removal of a potential black box warning for vaccines and calls for more accountability. - Resources and contact - Holcher invites listeners to follow him on X (Twitter) at @nichulsher and to read their work on focalpoints.com and through McCullough’s network. Note: The transcript presents Holcher’s claims and interpretations about vaccines, turbo cancers, autism, fertility, and policy changes. The summary reproduces these points without endorsement or evaluation.

COVID-19 did happen, but it was caused by lipid nanoparticle technology, not a virus. These nanoparticles hijack the human immune and neurological systems, leading to mild to severe disease. The so-called spike proteins are actually lipid nanoparticles, not a virus. When a magnetic hydrogel infects a biological cell, it becomes covered in spikes, which are the spike proteins. This technology reprograms the cell to release synthetic toxins in the body, causing COVID-19. James Giordano, who advised the US military and intelligence community in 2008, discussed the use of lipid nanoparticle technology as neuro weapons.

The speaker examined a Pfizer BioNTech COVID-19 injection under 100x magnification and observed extreme activity with blinking lights, which they identified as nano and micro robots communicating via light signals. These robots collaborate to self-assemble larger structures identified as microchips emitting a MAC address. The speaker claims to have found 54 undeclared chemical elements, including fluorescent Graphene Oxide, in COVID-19 injections and documented fluorescence in the blood. They state that childhood vaccinations contain the same self-assembling nanotechnology. Analysis of embalmed blood from a vaccinated individual who had been deceased for 8 months revealed similar filaments and micelles filled with blinking lights, exhibiting ongoing self-assembly.