reSee.it - Related Video Feed

The GOP is considering criminal referrals to end the impeachment process due to lack of evidence. Former Trump allies like Lev Parnas, who once spread lies about Joe Biden, are now speaking out against corruption. Many others, including Mike Pence and top military officials, have distanced themselves from Trump. Some loyal followers remain, but the speaker looks forward to hearing their stories about being drawn into a cult.

Maine's Secretary of State is being criticized for attempting to remove Donald Trump from a primary ballot. Critics believe this desperate move by Democrats to sway the election will not hold up in court. However, this action has inadvertently highlighted the weakness of Joe Biden's administration. Each attempt to disqualify Trump only boosts his popularity for a potential 2024 run.

House Republicans launched the impeachment inquiry, but now they regret it. They are warning against proceeding, comparing it to a dangerous situation.

The speaker talks about a range of theories that could be undertaken, suggesting that some approaches might be carried out in good faith even if the underlying aim is partisan. They express a desire to appear nonpartisan, framing it as a plausible or acceptable stance, while asserting that the real objective is to help Democrats win elections. The speaker goes further, stating that the ultimate aim is for the Republican Party to become pro-Democratic again, implying that partisan goals should be achieved even as the outward posture remains nonpartisan. They acknowledge that there is money involved from a Republican congress, which informs why there is a need to maintain the appearance of nonpartisanship. This point is tied to the financial dimension of political activity, suggesting that funding sources influence how partisan or nonpartisan a campaign or effort presents itself. The speaker notes that in 2022 there was a Republican House of Representatives, establishing the political context for the discussion and the timing of the strategies being described. This reference to the 2022 House situates the dynamics of party influence and the practical environment in which these ideas are supposed to operate. A central claim is that the goal is to help Democrats win until they run Nikki Haley or the ghost of John McCain again, indicating specific targets or figures as benchmarks for when the strategy would shift or when the alignment might change. The mention of Nikki Haley and “the ghost of John McCain” is used to illustrate particular political moments or personas that would influence how the strategy is executed or reframed. The speaker then asserts that it is not enough to simply help Democrats win. Beyond that, there is a need to create a Coke and Pepsi dynamic so that the Republican party ends up back in the box—an analogy implying that the party should be contained, moderated, or redirected in a way that makes it more compatible with the nonpartisan or pro-Democratic objective. The use of this metaphor emphasizes a desire to reset or constrain the Republican Party’s behavior or identity to align with the overarching goal of shaping outcomes in favor of Democratic interests.

Speaker 1 says that the real information about the Epstein files has not come out and that “there were only four Republicans, four of us that’s really fought to get them released,” who “signed the discharge petition, went against the White House,” and were “threatened,” with Donald Trump calling him a traitor and saying his friends would be hurt. He questions why anyone would vote for Republicans if the administration doesn’t release all the information, framing it as a line in the sand for many people. Speaker 0 asks why they think the Epstein files are being hidden. Speaker 1 responds that it’s because the hidden information would protect “some of the most rich, powerful people,” arguing that Epstein was “definitely some sort of part of the intelligence state” who was “working with Israel” and with the “former prime minister of Israel.” He asserts that these are “the dirty parts of government and the powers that be that they don’t want the American people to know about.” He concludes that, sadly, he doesn’t think the files will come out. Speaker 0 presses on whether Trump is in the Epstein files. Speaker 1 speculates that if someone is “living under blackmail” or “living under threat” and told not to release information, that fear could influence actions. He suggests that someone might be warned by threats to prevent disclosure, giving a hypothetical example: after standing on a rally stage, you could be shot in the ear and warned that “next time we won’t miss,” or that the bullet might be for someone you care about. He says he is “speculating,” but notes he has “a strong enough reason to speculate like that.”

President Trump has been indicted, which is causing outrage among his supporters. They argue that he has done nothing wrong and that this is just a ploy to undermine him. The indictment is related to a hush money case involving Stormy Daniels, but his supporters believe it is a weak reason to go after him. They believe that this move will only strengthen their support for Trump and ensure his re-election in 2024. They also criticize the lack of action against other politicians, such as Joe Biden and Hillary Clinton, who they believe have committed crimes. Republicans are urged to stand up for Trump and not let the Democrats run them over.

Two interesting dynamics are unfolding in Washington. Some Republican senators are engaging in what can be described as quiet defiance. While they aren't publicly opposing controversial nominees like Matt Gaetz or Pete Hegseth, they are signaling to Trump's team that they will not support these individuals. Public opposition would be preferable for transparency, but this behind-the-scenes maneuvering could help eliminate some problematic nominees. Gaetz appears to be the first on the chopping block, and Hegseth's position seems precarious as well. There's speculation that someone like Tulsi Gabbard may be next in line for scrutiny.

Some Democratic members of Congress are preparing for the possibility of litigation. They're considering if they have the best teams possible to carry out their work. Some Republicans may say that Democrats are weaponizing the Justice Department, citing Trump's trial as an example. But in the United States, we are judged by a jury of our peers. Trump was found guilty in court on 34 felony charges. It's hard to make a partisan argument against that.

Mike Johnson, as Speaker of the House, forced Republicans to vote on controversial far-left funding items in an omnibus bill without allowing amendments. He violated party rules and rushed the $1.2 trillion bill to a vote, angering many Republicans. This led to backlash and a motion to remove him from his position. Republicans are frustrated with this behavior and want change.

We are impressed by the election integrity efforts already underway and want to highlight recent victories. Early this morning, it was reported that Republican poll watchers in several Pennsylvania counties were initially turned away. However, after deploying attorneys and engaging with local officials, all Republican poll watchers have now been allowed access. This shows that when we stand up, we can achieve results. In contrast to 2020, we are prepared this time with a strong legal team led by RNC Chairman Michael Watley and Trump’s general counsel David Warrington. We have a robust army of lawyers and election workers ready to ensure that any attempts to undermine the process will not succeed again.

During Trump's time in office, Ronna Romney McDaniel, head of the Republican Party, played a role in sending fake electors to Congress and trying to overturn election results. She directed Michigan officials not to certify the vote and told them not to sign it. The goal was to use the party's power to reject election results and hold onto power. The current project is to convince Americans that the 2020 election was not legitimate and to undermine trust in future elections.

A handful of Republicans joined with all Democrats to take down a rule, which is rarely done. Ninety-six percent of House Republicans voted against proxy voting because they believe it's unconstitutional and that it would open a Pandora's box. The rule being struck down means there can be no further action on the floor this week. The House will not be voting on the SAVE Act for election integrity, rogue judges who are attacking President Trump's agenda, or taking down Biden policies with CRA votes. All of that was wiped off the table. They will regroup and come back to address it again.

Speaker 0: Jim Jordan played a significant role in Trump's attempt to challenge the election results. Speaker 1: Trump requested a vote recount, which is not the same as overthrowing the government. However, some believe the media's continuous portrayal of this narrative is influenced by project Mockingbird. Regardless, everyone involved is part of it.

Louisiana lawmaker Mike Johnson, a vocal supporter of former President Donald Trump, has been labeled an "election denier." He played a key role in the failed efforts to overturn the 2020 presidential election. Johnson is known for his fiery rhetoric, often compared to Jim Jordan, although he appears more mild-mannered with his glasses.

The speaker mentioned the goal of getting Republicans elected. However, the gentleman was not recognized and members were reminded not to engage in personal attacks against each other.

Representative Moe Brooks plans to challenge the election results on January 6th, claiming the House and Senate have the authority to reject electoral college votes from states with flawed election systems. Brooks believes that Donald Trump won if only lawful votes were counted. Brooks asserts that an honest voting system is the bedrock of a republic. He states he will object to submissions from states with flawed systems and needs a senator to join him to force a vote. He urges the American people to contact their representatives and demand they co-sponsor objections to flawed electoral college vote totals, or risk losing their vote. Brooks has not spoken with Republican leaders Kevin McCarthy or Mitch McConnell. He claims millions of illegal votes were cast, citing illegal aliens, non-citizens, and violations of article one section four of the United States constitution.

Speaker 0: I want to ask about what if you've changed position on what happened in the twenty twenty election. Speaker 1: Oh, I think it was rigged. Speaker 0: You think it was rigged? Speaker 1: Yeah. I know more now than I did then. What you'd have to do is in February 2021, was a Time Magazine article that was published, it was about Mark Zuckerberg investing $500,000,000 in a get out the Democrat vote campaign. And they focused on the swing states, Wisconsin, Minnesota, Michigan, Pennsylvania, Georgia, Arizona. And they focused in what they did is they basically did what I would refer to as agency capture. And they went in and they captured the, the county clerks and the secretaries of states in these states. They basically said, we have a get out the vote campaign program, and if you will implement it exactly the way that we say that you must implement it, we will give you massive amounts of money to run your elections. But if you do not run it the way that we say, then we can claw all that money back. Well, think about it. If you're a small county in Wisconsin and you get $300,000 from Mark Zuckerberg's foundation to make sure that there are drop boxes in your, in your Democrat heavy areas, that there are, that you've got a, an RV going around and hauling people into the, into the polling places to vote. When you do that, if, if you do not carry out, you take that money, you sign that contract and you do not do exactly what that foundation said, you were gonna have to use public money to pay it back. You most likely would have ended up in prison. I mean, that's just one example of the way that the election was rigged. The Mark Zuckerberg money was huge. $500,000,000 concentrated in Democrat counties for the purpose of getting out the Democrat vote. Speaker 0: How do you know it was to get the Democrat vote out? Because how does exactly do what are the mechanics of that? Of how it was You Speaker 1: I have to read the article. And what the article does is it lays it out, and the title is something along the lines of how a secret group of people were able to save the twenty twenty election, meaning how were they able to get Joe Biden elected.

A grand jury in Fulton County has indicted 19 individuals for breaking Georgia law by conspiring to overturn the results of the 2020 presidential election in the state. The prosecutors and investigators involved in the case have worked diligently to gather the necessary information for this indictment.

Steve Bannon may avoid jail if the bipartisan legal advisory group votes 3 to 2 in favor of the House filing an amicus brief declaring the January 6th committee illegitimate. This group consists of three Republicans who could sway the decision without a floor vote. The goal is to convince the court to recognize the committee as illegitimate and allow Bannon's bail to continue. This strategy could also apply to Peter Navarro. The belief is that Republicans are actively pursuing this course of action.

A group of over 200 Republicans who previously worked for former Presidents George H.W. Bush and George W. Bush, former Senator John McCain, or Senator Mitt Romney signed a letter backing Vice President Kamala Harris for president. The letter states that while they have ideological disagreements with Harris and Governor Walls, the alternative is untenable. This letter echoes support from a similar group.

Donald Trump has officially been elected president, defeating Vice President Kamala Harris. This marks a significant political comeback in modern American politics. CNN has made this projection following Trump's victory in Wisconsin.

Republicans who plan to vote against Jim Jordan on the second ballot are afraid of facing a primary challenge. They want to appear supportive by voting for Jordan initially but believe it's time to move on. The problem lies in the overwhelming number of calls they are receiving, with hundreds or even thousands flooding their offices. This is due to the strong grassroots campaign led by far-right activists in support of Jim Jordan.

Vote to elect a speaker of the house. Jim Jordan and Steve Scalise are principled conservatives. With ongoing conflicts in Eastern Europe, a major attack on Israel, economic challenges, and a border crisis, the American people want the Republican conference to unite, elect a speaker, and get back to work. However, Speaker 1 questions Jim Jordan's suitability due to a text he sent on January 5th, suggesting a violation of the constitution to block the election certification. Speaker 0 defends Jordan's integrity, unaware of his opinion on January 6th. Despite differing views on constitutional duties, Speaker 0 believes Jordan would lead with integrity and emphasizes the need for Republican unity in electing a speaker.

The Colorado Supreme Court ruled that Donald Trump is disqualified from the GOP primary ballot due to his involvement in the insurrection. This decision is significant as it marks the judicial system's involvement in determining a candidate's eligibility. The previous district judge's ruling was puzzling, but the Supreme Court clarified that the 14th amendment applies to the president as well. This decision may be appealed to the US Supreme Court, where the outcome is uncertain due to the conservative majority.

A federal prosecutor filed a court document criticizing proposed jury instructions that seem to favor Donald Trump. The prosecutor, Jack Smith, argues that the instructions are not supported by the law and essentially direct the jury to find Trump not guilty. This bold move by Smith is seen as a significant development in the case.