reSee.it - Related Video Feed

It is suggested that a small group was involved in something "off the charts bad." The speaker hopes someone like Whitney Webb will one day explain exactly how it was formulated, what they were doing, and how they were getting information out of people. The speaker believes that those involved have to age out and die before the truth comes out, using the JFK assassination as an example of a truth that remains hidden.

The speaker claims the Obama campaign spied on their campaign and was caught red-handed, possibly committing treason. They allege this has never happened before, or at least no one has been caught. The speaker believes spying occurred and that President Obama, Joe Biden, Comey, Brennan, Clapper, and Lisa Page all knew about it. They claim to have documented evidence in texts and other forms. The speaker describes this as a terrible act that should never happen again to a president and calls it a setup and a political crime of the century. They await the consequences for those involved.

Headline evidence from Jeffrey Epstein's safe went missing after an FBI raid, according to court testimony in the Ghislaine Maxwell trial. The speaker, a former federal agent, stated that they don't understand how evidence could be lost in such a high-profile case, given the strict protocols for cataloging and securing evidence in an evidence vault. The only time the speaker recalls seeing evidence lost was during 9/11 when the Secret Service office in 7 World Trade Center collapsed. The speaker also addressed an email regarding Epstein, Clinton, and a plane. The speaker stated that a friend who was on a plane with Epstein and Clinton witnessed suspicious activity. The friend has not provided permission to share the full story or specific details, but did allow the speaker to say that the events were "very odd" and bothered him. The speaker claims the friend's credibility is "unimpeachable."

The CIA is facing a lawsuit demanding information about the COVID-19 discovery team, a group within the agency. A whistleblower alleges that the CIA provided financial rewards to six agents on the team to change their stance on the virus's origin. The CIA initially claimed uncertainty on the matter, contradicting the consensus of their own experts. The Heritage Foundation is suing the CIA to uncover the truth and ensure accountability. The involvement of Dr. Fauci in influencing the agency's probe is also questioned. The CIA's denial of the lab leak theory is seen as questionable, considering the virus's origin in Wuhan, China.

The speaker alleges that a company chose a "least troublesome" witness they could easily win against, and that this choice was made the day before the witness was killed as part of a plan. The speaker claims there is enough data to assert the individual did not take his own life and that a larger plan was behind his death. The speaker states that culprits always make mistakes and that this information has been shared with the FBI. While the San Francisco FBI made no promises, there is hope that Kash Patel or the federal government will take interest and allocate resources to investigate. The speaker notes widespread support for the idea that the deceased did not commit suicide, citing reactions to PBD's podcast and other sources.

Speaker 1 mentions waiting for Bonnie Willis to respond. They discuss a whistleblower in her office who raised concerns about misuse of funds. Willis fired the whistleblower, prompting a subpoena for related documents. Willis made US Marshals serve the subpoena. They joke about Willis' behavior and mention CPAC. They express appreciation for CPAC's support of conservative principles. Translation: The speakers discuss Bonnie Willis not responding, a whistleblower's concerns, a subpoena for documents, and Willis' behavior. They joke about CPAC and express gratitude for its support of conservative principles.

Speaker 0 confesses in a video that they were paid to pretend to protest at the Capitol building. They mention having difficulty pulling off the act and getting a bruise on their leg. Although they don't reveal who paid them, they mention it was part of an organized effort.

The speaker discusses the FBI's investigation into a person accused of espionage. The FBI mistakenly believed that the person had left the country, but he was actually living in DC. Despite this, the FBI hired him and paid him over $200,000, even though they knew he was a Russian spy. The speaker also mentions another individual, Charles Dolan, who was a source for the false dossier used to spy on American citizens. Dolan and the Russian spy even met on a park bench, but the FBI refused to interview Dolan. The speaker criticizes the FBI's actions and highlights the problem of running investigations from headquarters instead of assigning a US attorney.

The speaker argues that “certain nefarious characters within the FBI and Department of War” helped assassinate Charlie Kirk and cover it up, and says they will present “correlated events” and “receipts.” They describe Stu Peters as an early proponent of an “exploding microphone theory,” and say they investigated further. The speaker’s first focus is an explosives procurement involving Acura Energetic Systems (AES). They say AES makes explosives and has government contracts, but highlight alleged anomalies tied to timing around Charlie Kirk’s assassination. They claim an AES contract had a procurement period from May 1 through August 2025, ending about eight months later “right before Charlie Kirk’s assassination.” The speaker says the contract was signed April 22, one month after Steven Feinberg took office, adding that Feinberg owned Cerberus, which the speaker says has CIA agents working for him and other intelligence personnel, and also owns DynCorp and special operations units “on how to detonate tiny explosives.” The speaker claims the AES contract used a simplified acquisition procedure (SAP) to streamline procurement, and they state the contract amount was “440,000, some odd change.” They allege there was only one bidder, and that in Federal Business Opportunities it was labeled “not applicable,” meaning it was never posted on SAM.gov even though they say SAPs are posted there. They also claim the contract was for “extra small, tiny explosives,” and that the speaker reviewed decades of online procurements and found nothing similar besides this one time. They further claim that the Department of the Navy made the contract, received devices, and that AES exploded “exactly one month after Charlie Kirk is assassinated.” The speaker states a CSB investigative report identifies the explosion timing as around 7.47 a.m., after the third shift ended around 7 a.m. and the first shift began. They claim the plant operated 24 hours per day with three shifts and that the explosion detonated about 23,000 tons of explosives, felt “from like miles away,” described as like an earthquake. They state all 16 people in the building died, and multiple people outside or in other buildings were severely injured. They also say the building made PETN and claim the company’s facility contained PETN. The speaker describes the post-explosion response as inconsistent. They say the Humphreys County Sheriff (Tennessee) stated it would take a long time to rule out “nefarious play,” while within two weeks, the ATF said it was an accident involving mixtures mishandled on the ground floor and a spark. The speaker claims AES’s building was “literally leveled.” They say OSHA closed its April 2026 investigation with 56 violations and that AES had “tons” of violations for decades. They add that OSHA closure did not stop government procurement from AES, and that press coverage “got under that rug.” They state AES has wrongful death lawsuits and should be unable to bid on federal contracts, yet they claim AES received its biggest contract “just a few weeks after Charlie Kirk’s assassination,” and in January 2026 received another largest contract valued at $377 million. They say they are not claiming bribery directly, but assert the situation “looks” like something was arranged. The speaker also references other procurements they plan to investigate, including FBI-related aerial surveillance in Arizona and an FBI procurement for truck beds from an automotive shop near UVU. They conclude by saying they believe “someone in the Department of War ordered the contract” and that FBI/ATF were part of a cover-up. They mention Senator Jamie Raskin discussing Kash Patel having “slush funds” paying $8,000 every two weeks to executive advisors, and say they want to check the timing of those payments.

The meeting begins with Speaker 0 welcoming engineers and first responders and expressing hope they will help the people affected by a complex rescue situation. They reference having arrived at the scene and discuss that it looks “very complicated.” Speaker 1 provides factual background about the collapse of the 12-story Champlain Tower South building in Surfside just before 01:30 in the morning on 06/24/2021, noting that ninety eight people died. Speaker 1 says the investigation used aerial photographs, building maintenance records, eyewitness reports, and studies of what was discovered below the ground. Speaker 0 then asks how a café in Beach, Miami relates to the Surfside condo, stating that John McAfee’s residence was at the Surfside condo. Speaker 0 claims that John McAfee was found dead in his prison cell the same day he learned he was being extradited back to the US to stand trial, and that three hours later, at 01:30 in the morning on 06/25/2021, the Surfside condo—described as containing information from McAfee’s residence—was demolished. Speaker 0 says the IDF was sent from Israel to investigate the Surfside condo and asks why the investigation would be conducted “other than to report back that all of the evidence was destroyed.” Speaker 0 recounts traveling to Miami “all the time,” and on one occasion bringing “two hard drives and 20 g’s cash” in a Manila envelope. Speaker 0 says the day after this, in an SUV with bodyguards, John McAfee placed his hand on Speaker 0’s lap, looked him in the eyes, and said that if he died or was found dead for any reason whatsoever, he did not kill himself. Speaker 0 claims McAfee said that if that happened, the two gentlemen who received the cash and the two hard drives were supposed to release information, described as a “dead man switch,” otherwise the information would not be released. Speaker 0 then questions why the two hard drives or the information were not released after the condo was demolished, claiming the condo’s destruction occurred mysteriously and asserting that everyone connected to h I l a r and their “cronies” dies. Speaker 0 concludes by saying that if something happens to them or their account, they may return to mercenary work because it would be “a lot safer,” and ends by stating “Way more to come.”

Last night, it was revealed that Tony Blinken played a significant role in orchestrating a plan involving 51 intelligence operatives. Their objective was to discredit a laptop that is widely known to be genuine. All evidence points to Blinken as the mastermind behind this scheme. It is crucial that he is questioned and held accountable for his actions.

John Durham possesses documents claimed to include the moving of pallets of cash by Barack Obama through the Dubai Embassy, with a CIA agent allegedly present, stating that $400,000,000 were moved. Maria Zak, from Nations in Action, describes information received from Italian Secret Service via Arturo’s girlfriend (whom she considers wife). She says Arturo came home claiming he didn’t understand why “we’re stealing America’s election,” and that Italian intelligence investigated Leonardo, a defense contracting firm, after Arturo confessed. Italian intelligence contacted Nations in Action on November 18, saying, “We’re watching a coup d’etat in The United States Of America.” They recount two affidavits delivered to Congress from Italian citizens and claim intelligence agencies fear corruption and China buying off politicians worldwide to take over countries or own property. Zak promises an audio tape to testify, noting Kansas as a pro-Trump elector victor but arguing the real election results are unknown to the public. Leonardo and satellite-linked operations are described: Italian intelligence reported activity around the United States election involving Leonardo personnel and people moving from Frankfurt to the Italian US embassy in Rome on Via Veneto. Italian sources allege coordination with Leonardo to alter U.S. election results. They claim a broader pattern: 47 to 52 presidential elections worldwide and over 200 telemetry experts speaking diverse languages, described as a calculated effort to remove presidencies and control nations. Zak introduces an audio recording allegedly from a CIA and State Department member named Larry Johnson, claiming she delivered a letter to Donald Trump on Christmas Eve 2020 about who stole the election, where, and how, and that Arturo Dahlia was a key witness she hoped to rescue. In the provided transcript excerpt, Johnson asks Zak for help contacting a lawyer because a man in Italy in jail is needed for extradition, claiming a national security team can extradite him and provide witness protection, with a phone number to call. Zak asserts the need for law enforcement investigations into Larry Johnson’s activities in the United States during the election, stating “If you see something, say something” but noting that witnesses and affidavits had limited assistance and many signatures did not match ballots. She cites over 35,000 illegal cross-county votes in Georgia alone, aligning this with President Trump’s discussion with Secretary of State Brad Raffensperger about illegally cast votes, and claims those votes should not have been counted. She alleges IT-based voting irregularities, with machines online and affidavits supporting numerous irregularities. Further details name individuals and entities: Stefano Serafini, a state department retiree who allegedly coordinated with General Claudio Graziano (EU commander) and Ignacio Moncada (CEO of FATA SPA, a Leonardo subsidiary). They claim meetings occurred at the Saint Regis Hotel in March 2020 and involved IT and telemetry specialists including Charles Robinson, described as a “telemetry expert” who loaded MilSpec software after traveling from Frankfurt to Rome. Arturo Della (Arturo Dahlia) is said to have confessed to Italy’s authorities; Beta (a second person) allegedly corroborated Arturo’s story with Italian intelligence. The Italian Secret Service is said to have provided Arturo’s associates’ information, and the arrest of Arturo and others followed an article Zak dropped in Italy, which she claims triggered significant Italian government upheaval, including the firing of Italy’s head of cybersecurity and the head of telecom. Zak also references Alexander Nix (linked to Cambridge Analytica) as involved in elections globally, with alleged ties to MI6 per Italian intelligence, and claims he attended U.S. election integrity meetings as late as October 2020. She suggests Italian intelligence had intercepts confirming these events, and claims Joe Biden allegedly called Matteo Renzi to remove Giuseppe Conte, leading to Conte’s downfall and global chaos according to their sources. She asserts that pallets of cash ($400,000,000) were moved to Merrill Lynch in Geneva, and that Durham has documents corroborating these movements. The request ends with a call for senators and congressional delegation to investigate, arguing that stealing from American families, including in Kansas, is wrong. She concludes by asking for confirmation on whether a satellite could send codes to change elections worldwide, to which the response in the discussion is agreement.

The speaker claims to have been approached by federal agents who wanted him to set up Hillary Clinton by arranging an $18 million bribe. He states that he cannot confirm if Clinton took the bribe or not. The agents later told him to forget about the incident. The speaker then explains that President Obama has control over the Department of Justice and plans to manage Clinton during her presidency through a plan called Operation Snow Globe. He suspects that John Brennan is the mastermind behind everything.

The speaker claims to have interviewed someone from the Chinese Space Agency who says they know the Apollo missions are fake. Allegedly, China is blackmailing NASA for secret space technology to keep quiet. The speaker suggests that if the truth were exposed, it would be damaging to NASA. This raises concerns about the government violating espionage laws.

The speaker claims to have facilitated an $18 million bribe for Hillary Clinton on behalf of the FBI. They state that Clinton accepted the bribe in January 2016 and that the FBI was involved in setting her up. The speaker also alleges that the FBI later told them to forget about the incident because Clinton was going to win the presidency and anyone involved in investigating her would be destroyed. They further assert that President Obama had a plan to control Clinton during her presidency and that the speaker was part of a coup against her. They claim to have known since October 2018 that the election would be hijacked.

Someone sent the speaker a video of a young, talented person from Chicago attacking him, claiming his father was in the CIA. The speaker initially dismissed this as untrue. However, after his father's death in March, he learned his father was indeed involved in that world, which shocked him. The speaker questions how this person knew about his father's involvement in intelligence, given his father's age. The person in the video claimed the speaker was a CIA operative. The speaker vehemently denies this, expressing strong animosity towards the CIA. He also says the person has since claimed he is funded by Russia. The speaker finds the CIA accusation personally offensive.

They suspect another assassination attempt on a leader before November. A Secret Service agent claims the agency's leadership is corrupt and unable to protect. The agent plans to blow the whistle and expects another attempt due to incompetence. The email was removed from servers, hinting at a cover-up.

Maria Zak, from Nations in Action, discusses alleged foreign interference affecting U.S. elections, presenting secondhand intelligence and personal testimony to support claims of a coordinated global operation. Key assertions and narrative: - The Italian Secret Service reportedly received information from Arturo’s girlfriend (who considers him a husband) whose uncle is part of Italian intelligence. She said Arturo came home and questioned why America’s election was being stolen, prompting an investigation by Leonardo after conversations with Arturo. Arturo allegedly confesses, and Italian intelligence claims to be watching a coup d'etat in the United States. - Two affidavits from Italian citizens were delivered to Congress. Italian intelligence agencies reportedly attempted to reach out because their country had fallen, and they describe worldwide corruption with China buying off politicians, influencing and using fraud to control countries and property. - Maria Zak plans to play an audio tape she says should shock America. She notes she has testified before and asserts credentials in government affairs. She argues that Kansas was a pro-Trump elector victor but contends the “real result” of the election is unknown to the public, along with undisclosed happenings in Italy. - Alleged movements related to Leonardo, a defense contracting firm, are described: people moving from Frankfurt to the Italian US embassy in Rome (Via Veneto) supposedly to collaborate with Leonardo to alter the U.S. election results. She claims 47 to 52 presidential elections globally and more than 200 telemetry experts speaking various languages, framing this as a calculated effort to topple presidencies and control countries. - An audio recording is presented from an individual described as a former CIA and State Department member named Larry Johnson. Johnson purportedly explains efforts to contact a lawyer, arrangements to extradite an individual (Arturo Delia) who would testify, and a plan involving witness protection and an airplane; Johnson urges Maria Zak to contact him. - Zak asserts that this “transcript” demonstrates proof and calls for immediate investigations by local, state, and federal law enforcement into Larry Johnson’s activities in the United States during the event. She emphasizes the “if you see something, say something” principle and states witnesses filed many affidavits. - Specific Georgia-related voting irregularities are cited: over 35,000 illegal cross-county votes, with cross-reference to state documents and USPS data showing voters did not reside where they voted; claims of fake residences, photocopied ballots, stacks fed into tabulators, and many fake, unfolded absentee ballots. She notes zero arrests among the thousands of affidavits filed by Nations in Action. - Individuals connected to the alleged international plot are named: Stefano Serafini (a former state department member who allegedly retired days before the election to avoid consequences), General Claudio Graziano (EU commander at the time), Ignacio Moncada (CEO of FATA SPA, a Leonardo subsidiary), and Charles Robinson (a telemetry expert who allegedly uploaded Mil-Spec software a week before the election and traveled from Frankfurt). Zak states they met at the Saint Regis Hotel to coordinate the plan and claims the Italian intelligence services provided her with Graziano’s go-order cellphone number.

The speaker questions whether their hypothetical death, following a tweet about the CIA and Mossad framing and torturing them, would be considered suspicious. They mention a real story that sent chills down their spine, involving Jeffrey Epstein. According to information received, Epstein allegedly operated a blackmail ring, using his connections to powerful individuals who attended his parties on his Caribbean island. The speaker highlights allegations that Epstein was protected by intelligence agencies, which may explain why he faced no consequences. They mention Alexander Acosta's involvement and his claim that he was instructed to leave the Epstein case alone because it belonged to intelligence.

Speaker 0 asserts: I’m not suicidal. Any creator, politician, or celebrity who tries to make a film or documentary on CPS has wound up dead, including a senator. The November film will be their hardest hitting, and they will “rip the veil off” to the point where CPS shows up at your door. Our government is running the world’s largest child trafficking network. They emphasize they would never kill themselves, do drugs, or put themselves in dangerous environments; if anything happens to them, it is the United States government. They watched the first take of the film and say, “they’re gonna kill me.” They urge a trip down memory lane to discuss Pizzagate, stating this is where it all starts. Speaker 1 begins by saying the Pizzagate story has outrageous connections and promising brand-new whistleblower information that will blow minds. They provide an overview: back to Bill and Hillary Clinton, whom many believe to be child pedophiles. They say there’s never been direct evidence, but in 02/2016 WikiLeaks published Hillary Clinton emails with John Podesta showing coded language about a child trafficking ring centered in a Washington, DC pizza restaurant basement at Comet Ping Pong. Edgar Maddison Welch went to the restaurant with firearms to “liberate the children,” but no one was hurt; it was later said there wasn’t a basement, so the scandal was dismissed, though there’s more to the story. The transcript then ties Hillary Clinton to Laura Silsbee, who was involved in trafficking, and outlines a chain: Hillary Clinton and Laura Silsbee exchanged documents detailing logistics of trafficking children from Haiti to Boise, Idaho. Laura Silsbee had previously kidnapped several dozen children from Haiti and attempted to cross into the Dominican Republic; she was caught and the children were returned to their families. Shawnee M. King is cited for reporting on Silsbee’s case. Jorge Puello, an attorney for Silsbee’s group, was suspected of leading an international trafficking ring; Puello was arrested in investigations by ICE and Homeland Security; his wife faced charges of sexual exploitation of minors and women. The narrative claims Hillary Clinton and Laura Silsbee were connected; Bill and Hillary Clinton allegedly helped negotiate the release of Laura Silsbee and her accomplices after their imprisonment in Haiti. Speaker 1 then ties the connections to CPS: the number-one source of child trafficking is the U.S. CPS system, and the number-one gateway to sex trafficking in America is the foster care system. The foster care system allegedly lost over 100,000 children in the last twenty years, raised questions about where they went, and claims millions of children are abused in foster care by financially compensated foster parents and social workers. The Adoptive Safe Families Act (ASFA), championed by Hillary Clinton and signed by Bill Clinton in 1997, supposedly created and financed CPS/foster care by diverting Social Security funds to 50 states, giving a financial incentive to “kidnap” children. It is claimed that CPS targets poor and minority children and single-parent families, and that the system now functions as a government-subsidized child-trafficking ring. Speaker 1 lists correlations: CPS is a tool used to target conservatives; CPS offices get paid per child kidnapped; 83% of removals lack proof of abuse. The claim is that Hillary Clinton created the system and that Laura Silsbee, a friend of Clinton, is involved in Idaho’s CPS network. Laura Silsbee allegedly works with Idaho Department of Health and Welfare (IDHW) and is a registered foster care parent in Idaho, receiving monthly payments for children in her custody, as shown by whistleblower-provided screenshots. Idaho’s Attorney General Raul Labrador opened an investigation into IDHW financial misappropriations, but Idaho’s Department director Dave Jepison resigned and disappeared, and Judge Lynn Norton allegedly issued an order halting the AG’s investigation. The Idaho Department of Health and Welfare allegedly dominates Idaho’s budget, and Laura Silsbee’s role with IDHW is framed as proof of a nationwide system. The narrative concludes by warning Idahoans to beware of Laura Silsbee (aka Laura Gaylor), Judge Norton, and supporters of IDHW, asserting that the system extends to all 50 states, including Arizona, Texas, and Florida, which are described as among the worst offenders in CPS corruption.

Speaker 0 confesses in a video that they were paid to pretend to protest at the Capitol building. They mention having difficulty pulling off the act and getting a bruise on their leg. Although they don't reveal who paid them, they mention it was part of an organized effort.

Maria Zak, from the organization In Action, claims that the Italian Secret Service received information from Arturo's girlfriend, who said that Arturo confessed to not understanding why they were stealing America's election. The Italian intelligence services reached out to Maria on November 18th, stating that they were witnessing a coup d'etat in the United States. Maria plays an audio tape from Larry Johnson, a member of the CIA and State Department, discussing the rescue of Arturo D'Alega. Maria calls for an investigation into these claims and highlights patterns of illegal activity in the election, including mismatched signatures and illegal cross-county voting. She also implicates individuals from the State Department and defense contracting firm Leonardo in coordinating the alleged election interference.

The conversation threads through a tangled set of relationships and alleged secrets surrounding Erika and her past marriages. Speaker 0 introduces Erika’s first husband, Derek Chelsvigg, and notes a young daughter from Erika’s earlier marriage, questioning why this history is hidden and suggesting possible trafficking concerns. They mention an apparent photoshoot with Erika’s ex-husband and speculate about whether Erika had another daughter, while observing that information about her past is being scrubbed online. The speakers reference Erika’s old Instagram and her ex-husband’s social media remaining private, implying secrecy around Erika’s past. They wonder if Erika is a time traveler and recall a past shoot with someone named Tyler, asking whether he was murdered or disappeared. They mention Cabot Phillips dating Erika after the marriage, and a timeline: seven days after that marriage, Cabot Phillips is seen playing ball with someone named Charlie. They propose theories that Erika could have harmed Charlie or that Charlie simply disappeared, and note that an ex-boyfriend may have reappeared in the scene. The possibility is raised that Erika is a honeypot moving between relationships, with “stepping stones” in her life. Speaker 0 also reveals that Erika has a sister, and asks where she is. Speaker 2 introduces a whistleblower: an insider who warns that exposing the truth would provoke retaliation against him and anyone who helps him. This person found emails, approvals, and signatures tying Erika’s wife’s charity work to the same network, and says he didn’t yell or accuse but went quiet, believing that if Erika is part of the network, everything has been a lie. For him, the matter shifted from politics to a personal crisis, and he says that if he stays quiet, he’s “one of them”; if he speaks, he’s dead, but people deserve to know. Speaker 0 asserts that Charlie discovered information about Erika and discussed filing for divorce two days before Charlie’s disappearance; there has still been no autopsy released, and Erika is the only person who could release it, labeled as “Sussy.” Speaker 1 announces a situation that is “absolutely out of control,” criticizing incompetent politicians and referencing a presidential figure, then broadens to state-level politics with John McCain mentioned. The speaker complains about campaign contributions, special interests, and lobbyists, and predicts political turnover. They vow to “make this country so great again” and describe an event where, according to the speaker, reporters who were crying were present—hard, better reporters who were once known to the speaker as not good people. The exchange ends with a more casual check-in: “How you doing back there?”

There is a pentagon that hides a billion dollars without any accountability, and it has never passed an audit. To uncover the truth, it seems that someone may need to leak information from these labs online, potentially facing dire consequences afterward.

The speaker claims a CIA whistleblower will testify before a Senate committee that the intelligence community has covered up the origin of COVID for years. The speaker asserts evidence shows the U.S. government funded research in Wuhan and that the virus likely escaped from a lab, adding that CIA scientists concluded it came from a lab leak and that someone later “scribbled out” their conclusion at 2AM and changed the report. The speaker frames CIA involvement as part of a larger effort involving military-related covert operations, stating the CIA has two reasons to live: covert support for the State Department or for the military. The speaker argues that over time, long-term CIA covert actions become USAID programs for logistical reasons, especially when scaling beyond a small “need to know” group and security-clearance constrained operations. The speaker says covert action requires secrecy, skiffs, close-hold communications, and a small number of people, so a public-facing program is needed to broaden participation. In that model, the speaker says USAID or state department programs can engage the private sector, nonprofits, universities, researchers, activists, and media, with public messaging and political support to help scale the underlying aims while keeping the core plan secret. The speaker links this asserted COVID narrative to historical biological warfare and “gain of function” research, citing declassified documents from the 1950s and Operation Northwoods-era plans involving Cuba. The speaker claims Cold War U.S. military and CIA planning included “gain of function” research and the dropping of disease-infected ticks and insects over Cuban agricultural areas to induce crop failures and economically destabilize Cuba without a conventional military invasion. The speaker further claims the plans involved making biological agents appear to be of natural origin and avoiding traceable external attribution, describing discussion of using “nonlethal insect borne biological warfare agents” and coordinating planning information with specific people and labs. The speaker states that, according to their account, biological warfare planning involved references to Fort Detrick and the Rocky Mountain lab in Montana, which they say also played a key role in both COVID-19 and Lyme disease. They claim the same lab used for Lyme was connected to plans for accidental releases intended to look natural. From there, the speaker argues that COVID-origin research ties into personnel and timelines. They claim that in 2015 the CIA and ODNI reached out to Ralph Baric to discuss coronavirus evolution and adapting coronaviruses to humans, and that shortly afterward Baric collaborated with Zheng Li Shi (“the bat lady”) on research funded through USAID’s PREDICT program. The speaker also claims that in 2018 Baric and Zheng Li Shi were listed as collaborators on a DARPA proposal involving a furin cleavage site, and that in January 2020 Baric was summoned by ODNI biological sciences experts to brief officials on coronavirus origins, discussing a possible accidental lab release at the Wuhan Institute of Virology. The speaker asserts Avril Haines, then deputy head of the CIA, later became head of ODNI and played a key role in the Event 201 simulator. The speaker concludes by tying these threads back to the alleged CIA-to-USAID scaling mechanism and to CIA contractors and censorship efforts, claiming that the CIA’s role explains why CIA-walked scientists concluded a lab leak and why the conclusion was allegedly altered. They also discuss NIE/DOD/USAID/NED linkages, asserting that NED is suited for the role of supporting covert objectives with indirect public-facing infrastructure.