reSee.it - Related Video Feed

The speaker believes "the powers that be" created a false emergency around SARS CoV 2 for financial gain, even though it only posed a threat to 0.1% of the population. They claim this was an opportunity to test new technology that had consistently failed, using humanity as test subjects. The speaker compares this to Mengele's experiments and calls it a breach of human rights that destroyed lives and businesses, and increased poverty. They hope history will judge those responsible as shameful.

This video claims that the COVID pandemic was a test to see how much control the government could exert over its citizens. The speaker believes that the ultimate goal is to transform free societies into totalitarian ones, stripping away individual rights and freedoms. They urge people to stop trusting their governments and to stop rationalizing their actions. The speaker emphasizes the importance of speaking up and rebelling against this perceived tyranny.

It was all just a test to see if we would comply. The World Economic Forum has revealed that COVID-19 served as a test of our obedience to a rapidly forming new world order. According to their website, COVID-19 was described as a test of social responsibility, where billions adopted significant public health restrictions. This included social distancing, wearing masks, vaccinations, and accepting contact tracing applications. These actions demonstrated individual social responsibility. It was all a test.

The speaker says their role is to present context that, in their view, the past four years involved “orchestration to assault the liberties of people” by “pretending” the situation was a public health emergency while enabling “inconceivable threat to liberties” and “violation of human rights.” They frame this as “lip service to tyrants” and as “domestic and international terrorism.” They argue that evidence begins in the UK in 1966, saying the UK’s wealth and trust decided to fund “the coronavirus as the preferred form of human manipulation” in 1966. They then claim that one year later, the United States and the UK agreed to “modify and manipulate coronavirus” to see what could be done to infect a healthy population (described as 1967). They characterize “Operation Warp Speed” as arriving after 56 years. They cite an imaged 2011 document, described as stating “antitrust collusion” involving the Wellcome Trust, the Rockefeller Foundation, the Gates Foundation, NIAID, and the Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention. The speaker claims this group established a mandate that “by 2020, the world would accept… a universal vaccine” by the end of 2020, and they say the group identified coronavirus as the thing nature would need for the plan to happen. The speaker then quotes a 2015 public statement: “To sustain the funding base beyond the crisis, we needed to increase the public understanding of the need for medical countermeasures such as a pan influenza or pan coronavirus vaccine.” They say that at the time, the World Health Organization had officially declared coronavirus an eradicated disease, and they ask what world would need a vaccine for an eradicated disease. They argue that media hype drives economics: “A key driver is the media, and the economics will follow the hype,” and that “We need to use that hype to our advantage to get to the real issues.” They add that investors respond if they see profit, and characterize this as treason or terrorism. They say that Peter Daszak will testify in Congress in “a few short days” that the emergence likely came from a random event in Wuhan, China, where a bat and pangolin “got together and voila” by December, calling it “conspiracy level language.” The speaker asserts this is an admission of conspiracy “to commit acts of terror.” They also cite 2016 language, claiming an announcement that the Wuhan Institute of Virology Virus 1 was “poised for human emergence,” and treat this as part of the same “conspiracy.” Next, the speaker claims evidence includes a 2002 patent filed on “synthetic primary coronavirus,” which they say was “patented to be infectious and replication protective,” calling it “weaponized.” They further claim that in 2005, a curriculum vitae indicates “synthetic coronaviruses, biohacking, biological warfare enabling technologies,” and they question the meaning of that phrase, linking it to biological weapons. They state they have U.S. credentials since 2002 as a “biological weapons inspector” and say they briefed the matter since then. Finally, they cite a WHO Global Preparedness Monitoring Board announcement in September 2019, saying that between 09/19/2019 and September 2020 there would be “our greatest… accidental or intentional release of a respiratory pathogen,” emphasizing the word “release” as “not a leak” and suggesting no mention of accident likelihood.

The speaker believes that there is a global crime being committed by those in power who are pretending that there is a serious respiratory viral health threat. They argue that the virus in Wuhan was not exaggerated and that there is no new health threat. They suggest that if there is a new virus, it is not more serious than influenza, which coincidentally disappeared at the same time. The speaker no longer believes in the existence of respiratory viruses and thinks that people still get ill with the same illnesses as before, but the cause is unknown.

The speaker believes that if a problem is presented as a global crisis, it is likely a scam. They argue that global crises are often fabricated, using non-existent or local problems to create a sense of urgency. The speaker cites the COVID policy response and the climate change crisis as examples. They claim that these crises are used to push for global authority and control. The speaker also notes that dissenting voices are often silenced, and science is presented as static knowledge rather than an evolving activity. They conclude that these patterns are proof of a scam, and people should be aware of them.

The speaker believes that the COVID pandemic was a test to see how much control the government could have over individuals in a free society. They argue that the ultimate goal is to transform free and democratic societies into totalitarian ones, stripping people of their rights. The speaker urges people to stop giving their governments the benefit of the doubt and to stop complying with their actions. They emphasize the importance of speaking up and rebelling against the government's control.

In October 2019, an event called event 201 took place in New York, simulating a pandemic. The speaker questions why the CIA was involved, suggesting they want to use the pandemic as an excuse to limit free speech and control the population. They mention that the CIA discussed restricting criticism of government policies and the lab leak theory before the Wuhan outbreak. Another speaker suggests flooding communication channels with trusted sources instead of controlling communication. The speaker expresses concern about the CIA using future pandemics to undermine American democracy and the bill of rights.

Speaker 0 asserts that the design of the molecular structures in vaccines and injections has no purpose other than to injure and kill. Drawing on 30 years of experience in rational drug design, they say every component in a vial is chosen by someone with specific objectives (e.g., how quickly absorbed, how long it lasts, where it distributes in the body) and that these components are not random or natural products. They declare the ingredients to be toxic by design and intentionally harmful. This, they claim, fits with what they call “the lie” about the pandemic, arguing there wasn’t a real pandemic. According to Speaker 0, the pandemic’s purpose was to damage the economy, train people to comply under a mock emergency, and compel people to get vaccinated. They warn that if people do nothing, speak up less, and simply follow directives, they will lose their freedom and then their lives. They allege that a self-appointed group of very rich people desires a much smaller global population than 8,000,000,000 people, and they claim to be able to deduce the script behind these events. The speaker urges listeners to start talking to anyone and everyone relentlessly, insisting that this situation is not going away. They warn that without protest and refusal, people will first lose their freedom and then their lives.

The speaker argues that the war in Iran and associated U.S. and Israeli actions are presented as a complex, intractable crisis, but in reality follow a simple pattern of a “controlled collapse” already underway. The collapse is said to be visible in everyday life, such as rising gas prices after the Strait of Hormuz being effectively closed and tensions around the conflict; the war is described as having caused thousands of deaths and sending energy markets into upheaval, with oil at a four-year high and inflation fears resurging as the Fed is expected to raise rates. Key events cited include the February 28 to March 1 strikes launched by the United States and Israel, the 48-hour ultimatum from President Trump demanding Iran reopen the Strait of Hormuz, and the deployment of thousands of Marines to the Middle East. The speaker asserts Iran’s threat to respond by closing the Strait of Hormuz and targeting U.S. linked energy infrastructure and IT networks, including desalinization plants and data centers, stating that this represents not de-escalation but the architecture of a broader war. The narrative challenges conventional claims that Iran is degraded or cornered, noting that Iran has fired long-range missiles toward the U.S. base on Diego Garcia and conducted strikes near Israel’s Demona nuclear facilities, contradicting the idea that Iranian military capability has collapsed. The speaker argues that war messaging routinely declares the enemy weakened while the conflict expands, and asks why thousands of Marines are being deployed if victory is close and missiles are supposedly diminishing. The broader thesis is that this is part of a larger, premeditated shift toward centralized control. War and energy shocks are said to destabilize prices and justify intervention, with examples of strategic petroleum reserve releases and sanctions easing to calm markets. The speaker links this to a longer-running plan to install emergency governance and digital control systems: surveillance, mobility restrictions, and a move toward digital money, identity, and movement management. They point to developments such as China’s digital yuan expansion, Europe’s digital euro, and the push toward “15-minute cities,” arguing that these are precursors to a digitized, programmable money system. The speech asserts COVID-19 demonstrated how governments can impose sustained fear and centralized control, with digital gatekeeping and state-corporate coordination seen as a live test. It is argued that the “rollout” is not about a temporary crisis but a permanent, durable control grid, with airports adopting faster digital processing and biometric scanning, and the public gradually accepting reduced freedoms and increased dependence as a solution to emergencies. The speaker concludes that the conflict is not as complex as claimed; it is about control and the expansion of a surveillance, monetary, and movement-management system under the guise of crisis management, and invites audience feedback on this perspective.

The speaker predicts that those in power may use their authority to impose lockdowns again, stating it is likely to happen. They believe that another pandemic is certain to occur, and there will be other reasons to justify potential lockdowns. The speaker emphasizes the importance of discussing these concerns openly. They also mention that current events in the United States are an attempt to rewrite history.

Breaking news: the president declares a national emergency. Stay-at-home orders are in place, with strict consequences for non-compliance. The pandemic is primarily affecting the unvaccinated. The speaker questions how people are being coerced into following these measures and explores historical instances of mass compliance against self-interest. They discuss the concept of mass formation and the potential for a great reset. The importance of data control and the manipulation of fear and isolation are highlighted. However, there is a growing awakening among people worldwide, with diverse voices coming together to demand change. The speaker emphasizes the need for individual action and not relying on the media or leaders. This is seen as a pivotal moment, with the masks of humanity being lifted and a great awakening occurring.

The speaker suggests that both COVID and climate change are presented as global crises to manipulate people. They claim that these crises are fabricated and used to push for global control and authority. The speaker points out that countries like Sweden and Tanzania faced backlash for questioning the mainstream narrative on COVID. Similarly, they argue that the climate change crisis is based on the idea that CO2 is the biggest threat and that consuming fewer fossil fuels is the only solution. The speaker also highlights the suppression of dissenting voices and the presentation of science as static knowledge rather than an evolving activity. They conclude that these patterns are proof of a scam.

Breaking news: the president declares no emergency and announces a new stay-at-home order. The government threatens to shut down non-compliant individuals and enforce vaccination. A speaker questions how people are being coerced into following these measures and explores the concept of mass formation. They highlight the current economic crisis as an opportunity for a reset, but warn that it may lead to enslavement. The speaker claims that technology can manipulate humans on a large scale and that our lives have been infiltrated by those who don't have our best interests at heart. They argue that fear and isolation are being used to induce mass psychosis. However, people are starting to wake up and unite across different backgrounds to be the solution themselves. The speaker emphasizes the importance of staying true to one's beliefs and not returning to ignorance. They conclude by stating that the masses have been awakened and it is time for a great awakening.

The speaker suggests that there is a global crime being committed by those in power who have exaggerated the threat of a new respiratory virus. They argue that there is no real health threat and that the only moving part in this situation is the PCR test. The speaker questions the existence of respiratory viruses and believes that people still get ill with similar symptoms as before, but the cause is unknown. They conclude that these illnesses are not caused by respiratory viruses.

The speaker questions the true cause of the high death toll during the pandemic, suggesting it may not have been due to a deadly disease but rather the measures put in place. They ponder if COVID-19 was just a rebranding of existing illnesses to instill fear and control. The speaker raises concerns about loss of freedom, censorship, and demonization of non-compliant individuals.

The speaker believes that the COVID pandemic was a test to see how much control the government could exert over individuals in a free society. They argue that the ultimate goal is to transform democratic societies into totalitarian ones, stripping people of their rights and making them dependent on a global elite. The speaker urges people to stop giving their governments the benefit of the doubt and to stop rationalizing their actions. They emphasize that compliance will not lead to freedom and encourage people to speak up and resist.

In the event of another pandemic, the speaker asserts that the response should differ drastically from the previous one. They claim that established scientific and medical protocols were disregarded in favor of a politicized approach serving specific economic and power interests, leading to information chaos. The speaker emphasizes the need for gold standard information and complete transparency to enable public inquiry and informed responses. They advocate for challenging established orthodoxies and consensus, criticizing the notion of blindly trusting experts as antithetical to science and democracy, likening it instead to totalitarianism and religion.

Speaker 0 argues that COVID-19 was “a test balloon” used to determine how far authorities could go in a free and democratic society to make free individuals consent to being forced into compliance. They claim the purpose was not public health, but to transform free societies into totalitarian ones by stripping fundamental rights including freedom, democracy, and the rule of law. Speaker 0 further asserts that COVID-related measures were intended to break people into a “mindless, malleable mass” controllable by a “globalitarian elite,” creating dependency and destruction of individuals. Speaker 0 urges people worldwide to stop giving democratically elected governments the benefit of the doubt, stating they are “not deserving” of that trust. They call for people not to rationalize government actions or assume good intentions, claiming political elites have never been concerned about the well-being of regular people and that this is “not any different now.” Speaker 0 emphasizes that compliance cannot resolve tyranny, saying it is impossible to “comply your way out of a tyranny” and that continued compliance will “feed a gigantic alligator.” Speaker 0 concludes by urging people to “end tyranny” through their actions—specifically by not remaining silent, “speak up,” stop complying, and “start rebelling.” They end by stating that authorities are “out to get you if you do not resist.”

Speaker 0 and Speaker 1 discuss criticisms of the COVID-19 response, focusing on diagnostic testing, treatment, and government actions. Speaker 0 notes that only fourteen percent of PCR-positive cases turned out to be COVID in Germany, and suggests this is a global pattern, including the United States. Speaker 1 responds that there is no surprise, stating that the PCR test was never designed to detect infection. He explains that it detects miniscule particles of the RNA virus and that cycle threshold was cranked up to create positivity. He emphasizes that tests should not dictate treatment and that, in his view, doctors treat patients, not test results. He accuses the government of suppressing effective repurposed medications such as hydroxychloroquine and ivermectin, calling the approach a money-driven scam based on fear, and asserts this was no surprise from Germany. Speaker 0 adds that, beyond money and vaccines, the response was weaponized to keep people at home to influence political outcomes, suggesting it was part of efforts related to the 2020 election. He claims the positives were valued over negatives and asserts that the goal was to keep people in fear to ensure compliance with directives. Speaker 1 agrees, arguing that fear increases compliance with directives. He says he has never seen anything like the government imposing its will on free citizens, including closing churches and mom-and-pop stores, forcing healthy people to stay indoors, closing hospitals, and telling sick people to stay away. He expresses concern about whether the American people learned their lesson and hopes that, if the government acts similarly again, enough people will stand up and say, “hell no.”

The speaker claims that the COVID-19 pandemic was premeditated and an act of terrorism by a state. They argue that the United States and the UK, along with researchers worldwide, planned to use the virus to impose tyrannical reforms on society. They emphasize that there are many people who did not comply with these measures. Another speaker praises the evidence presented by the first speaker, stating that it is all based on published documents and facts. They encourage others to read the documents and draw their own conclusions.

The president declares a national emergency and urges people to get vaccinated. The speaker questions how people are being convinced to comply with pandemic measures. They mention the concept of mass formation and the opportunity for a reset. The importance of data control is emphasized. The speaker believes that fear and isolation are being used to induce mass psychosis, but people are starting to wake up. They encourage individuals to be the solution and not rely on the media or politicians. The audience is described as diverse and united. The speaker declares this as the great awakening and states that people cannot go back to the old ways.

Many believe a global cult orchestrates a pandemic hoax. The cult, with a central "spider" figure, controls interconnected groups worldwide. The pandemic narrative was driven by flawed testing and fear tactics. Lockdowns were justified by inflated death projections. Western countries followed China's draconian model. The cult's influence extends to health policies and financial incentives for COVID-19 diagnoses. The aim is to create a "new normal" and transform society.

The speaker emphasizes the PCR test as the foundation of the current situation, stating that without it, there would be no cases or public health emergency. They question the necessity of measures taken, pointing out the absence of excess mortality before the vaccination campaign. The speaker suggests focusing efforts on addressing the PCR test as the key issue.

The speaker claims that the COVID-19 pandemic was not a result of incompetence or lack of knowledge, but rather a planned event. They accuse various groups, including philanthropaths, scientists, NGOs, and governments, of being involved in the deception. The speaker suggests that the pandemic was used as an opportunity for control and profit, with corporations, regulators, and media playing a role. They criticize the censorship of dissenting voices and the coercion of individuals to get vaccinated. The speaker urges people not to let those responsible for the pandemic escape accountability.