reSee.it - Related Video Feed

Speaker 0 suspects another person is involved in the TA, possibly a conflict agent. Someone is currently searching for information about this. The speaker then addresses someone named Heather about parking.

I found Brian in the server logs, showing him the database. Christy Francois let him in, which could be a problem later on.

Speaker 0 describes repeatedly witnessing what they say is deliberate killing and gross medical mismanagement of hospitalized COVID patients, saying “nobody will listen.” They compare the situation to Nazi Germany putting Jews into gas chambers, and say they are told “you can't save everybody” even though they insist the patients are “not dying from COVID.” Speaker 0 gives multiple examples: an anesthesiologist intubated a patient incorrectly, with only one side of the chest inflating; after about five hours waiting for a chest X-ray, the patient died. A patient with a heart rate of 40 in a stable bradycardic rhythm received chest compressions by a resident, which Speaker 0 says was not appropriate; Speaker 0 ran in to stop him, but the resident then “pushed epi,” placed defibrillation pads, and defibrillated, and the patient died. Speaker 0 says they repeatedly tried to get the director of nursing to stop the actions, but the patient was still killed. They also describe nurses placing an NG tube into the lungs and filling lungs with tube feeding, and confusing long-acting insulin with short-acting insulin and giving 30 units of fast-acting insulin, which they say killed the patient. They claim patients are “just going to let them rot on the vent” and that blood transfusions are not provided even though, they say, COVID patients “all eventually need a blood transfusion,” because vent settings do not work without adequate oxygen-carrying capacity. Speaker 0 describes staffing and procedural failures: a nurse reportedly fell asleep and norepinephrine ran out while a patient had no blood pressure and was not perfusing the brain; Speaker 0 says the same nurse is now running a CRRT machine “that she has never done before.” They say nurses were not swapped even though a nurse who knows the machine could handle it, and they predict the patient will die soon. They also say some patients are on only sedation or not truly treated for COVID, including a woman on a trank (tracheal vent-related mention) who is not “even cognizant,” and who only receives breathing treatments (albuterol) and insulin. They describe a cycle of vent and sedation management: day shift weans sedation to minimum, but at night the same residents increase sedation again, undoing day shift work; day shift attending rounds and says synchronization problems required turning sedation up, while Speaker 0 says the issue is the event mode being wrong. Speaker 0 says attempts to contact advocacy groups were unsuccessful, and they feel out of ideas. Speaker 0 further claims patients are not properly assessed: they say nobody listens to lungs, even with disposable stethoscopes, and that they have seen patients already in body bags with no knowledge of how long they had been dead. They say they were told a patient was acidotic and should be treated, but instead the patient’s condition was allowed to worsen, kidneys shut down, and then bicarb was run late; Speaker 0 says the patient became overloaded with fluid, developed heart failure, and died. They also describe witnessing procedures resulting in death, including an ET tube placed incorrectly causing choking on blood, and a central line complication where a doctor allegedly ruptured a subclavian vein and the patient bled to death. Speaker 1 and Speaker 0 discuss that Speaker 1 is also “not a doctor,” while Speaker 0 maintains that actions like defibrillating a patient with a heart rate of 40 in a stable rhythm constitute “murder.” Speaker 1 adds that “nobody cares” and makes comments about “minorities” and “the hood.” Speaker 0 says a prior lead who advocated for patients was moved to a different hospital and had warned Speaker 0 there would be problems. Speaker 0 ends by saying they will go back to the unit and “see how they kill him there,” urging people to stay safe and “stay out of NYC for your health care.”

Christy has access to the server room, and we need to send her name there. The server logs reveal Brian's involvement, and there's a significant database that I expected to find. Brian is a valuable team member despite any criticism. We see Christy interacting with the logs and deleting entries. She is granting Brian access to the server, and I’m monitoring the console. At this point, Christy is not in the room, but she is coordinating with others. This situation raises concerns as multiple people are nearby, indicating potential issues.

I found a video where the speaker goes through some server logs and discovers a database issue. They mention finding different forensics related to it. They also mention a person named Christy, who seems to be active in the GMC community.

The speaker recounts an interaction with someone named Nick Christakis on Twitter. They question whether Nick was aware of a specific study when he made a conclusion about vaccination. The speaker wanted Nick to admit he didn't know about the study, but he didn't. The speaker believes Nick is compromised and possibly dishonest. They also criticize people who wear masks and claim to be objective but push their own agendas. They mention Kathy Young and Nicholas Christakis as examples of such people.

The speaker is discussing the search for a PCR report from August 10, 2019, but it cannot be found in the fire department database. They speculate that the person may have been taken directly to the morgue. The speaker mentions having photographs of the person in the hospital. They discuss the possibility of the fire department personnel taking the person somewhere else, but the computer system does not have any record of it. The speaker acknowledges that the information they received from the fire department differs from what the computer system shows. They express confusion about why the record is missing.

Christy accesses the server room and introduces Brian, a new forensics expert. She shows him the server logs and points out the deletion of certain logs. They discuss the importance of investigating further and mention the presence of other individuals. The video ends with a mention of someone named Matt.

The speaker reviewed server logs and identified "Brian." The speaker found a database in the next vendor and new forensics. Christy is mentioned in connection to a server. The speaker shows access and a deletion on the log from the database. A previous tweet shows Christy letting Brian into the server. The speaker repeats "Here he is" multiple times. The speaker mentions another law proposal and altering.

Speaker 0 expresses tension and uncertainty: "You've almost got over here." "Oh my fucking" "Should I drive her with this guy? Drive." "Is he dead? I don't know." "Hopefully." "Wait. Is that"

Speaker 0 notices the trailer lights are off and asks Speaker 1 to find them, emphasizing that driving in the dark is unsafe. Speaker 1 repeats that he doesn’t know where the lights are and has been trying to locate them. Speaker 0 questions how long Speaker 1 has had his CDL, and Speaker 1 responds two months. Speaker 0 expresses disbelief that someone with a two-month CDL doesn’t know where the lights are, noting that he has been driving in the dark and stressing that it’s not acceptable. Speaker 1 reiterates that he’s trying to find the lights but cannot. Speaker 0 scolds him for driving in the dark and asks if he truly has a CDL, stating that he doesn’t want to be rude but implies that Speaker 1 may be causing an accident. Speaker 1 acknowledges awareness of the potential danger but continues to say he’s trying to locate the light. Speaker 0 asks to see Speaker 1’s CDL and then abruptly dismisses the request, muttering that perhaps Speaker 1 doesn’t have it. He repeats the question about the CDL and asks where it is, suggesting that the two-month CDL might not be valid or real. Speaker 1 confirms again that he has had the CDL for two months. Speaker 0 asks if Speaker 1 is from here or from America, indicating a language or origin line of questioning, and then hands the CDL back to Speaker 1, telling him to take it back and that he’s good to go but reiterates that he doesn’t think Speaker 1 should be driving. In closing, Speaker 0 reiterates his concern and lets Speaker 1 leave, acknowledging that he is not going to stop him but making it clear that he does not believe Speaker 1 should be driving. The exchange ends with Speaker 0 warning again that driving in the present condition is unsafe and implying that Speaker 1 may be unfit to operate a vehicle.

Speaker 0 states that they want to ensure the others are okay, accusing them of driving like a complete maniac. They say they need to verify that they’re good, and once verified they will be out of there. They ask, “You understand?” The response is “No.”

The speaker hands a cease and desist notice to the pharmacist, warning them about liability for any injuries from COVID injections. The speaker mentions a register to track delivery, eliminating plausible deniability.

The speaker mentions a strange occurrence where a person named Michael appeared in the voter records, even when the speaker entered their Social Security number. They express confusion and ask for help to understand who made the mistake. Even after re-entering the Social Security number and address, the person in question is still not identified as a woman. The speaker concludes that Michael is likely the driver.

The speaker reviewed server logs and identified "Brian." The speaker found forensics in a database. The speaker shows access and a deletion on the log from the database. The speaker claims Christy previously tweeted about letting Brian into the server. The speaker repeats "Here he is" multiple times. The speaker mentions a law proposal.

The speaker states they cared about the server, the network, and their family first, including their partner, Shay. The speaker accuses someone of staying up all night to slander them and acting like a psychopath while pretending to be a traditional wife and mother. The speaker claims this person was going after their girlfriend, who hates them. The speaker then says they will show viewers that they still have their Twitter account when the video was made.

They are witnessing medical negligence and deaths in a hospital, with patients not dying from COVID. Instances include incorrect intubation, wrong medications, and lack of proper care. Despite efforts to advocate for patients, the situation remains dire. The speaker expresses frustration at the lack of action and concern for the patients' well-being.

The speaker believes an unnamed individual is insane and "fucking crazy." They have been discussing this person with Chris for days. The speaker expresses concern for someone's safety, telling them to "be good out there" and "be safe."

Here's the video everyone is talking about. We’re examining the server logs, and it turns out it’s Brian. We’ll look at a database that enhances our findings. Forensics play a crucial role here, especially with AT&T and the server. I’ll demonstrate the app access and the log deletion process. You all know the history behind this. This is another log we’re reviewing, likely related to daily activities, such as purchasing a truck.

The speaker tracks online searches about Charlie Kirk’s hospitalization at Tempanogos Regional Hospital, noting a spike around July 20 and a District Of Columbia query the day before: "we should really make sure we know what the Tempanogos Regional Hospital is. We really should make sure we know the day before he gets shot." They question whether an autopsy was performed, asking, "I wonder who the medical examiner is in Utah" and citing "Deidra Amaro" as the Utah medical examiner. An IP address from Israel looked up "Deidre Amaro" on 06/30/2025. The search expands to surgeons at the Orem branch: "Steven Neelman," "Robert Patterson, MD," "Lee Trotter," "Lee Patterson," "Brian Gill," "Richard Rasmussen"—all with Israel-origin IPs around July 19-22. They speculate about VPNs and ask if this relates to "an assassination where they rushed the body there, and there was a surgeon that declared Charlie Kirk a Superman and claims he found the bullet, and then signed the death certificate, and there was a watchdog." "I'm not drawing conclusions tonight."

There is a discussion about log files on two screens. One screen shows hundreds of log files from 2019 until May 22, 2021. The other screen only has three years of log files, which have mysteriously disappeared. It is mentioned that when a Dominion employee came in, the log files vanished. These files record all access to a specific machine. It is also mentioned that Dominion sent people around the country for software updates during that time. Some participants confirm this information.

In this video, the speaker talks about checking the server logs and finding something interesting. They discovered a database in their extended logs, which they believe is related to forensics. They mention someone named Christy, who is an active member of the GMC community.

The speaker is sharing screenshots in response to Heidi, who shared screenshots against what the speaker is doing. The speaker is trying to find someone they can trust who is standing with them, identifying Soap and RJ as trustworthy. The speaker asks if they have ever betrayed Soap and RJ, asserting they would never throw them under the bus for anything.

The speaker is sharing screenshots in response to Heidi, who is also sharing screenshots and is against what the speaker is doing. The speaker is trying to determine who they can trust and who supports them. They identify Soap and RJ as trustworthy allies. The speaker asks if they have ever betrayed Soap or RJ and asserts they would never throw them under the bus, especially in a situation like this.

Speaker 0 expresses intense anger toward the Trump administration, saying: "I give a fuck about any fucking person in the Trump administration being upset with giving them oh, how dare you?" They claim others have "no fucking idea to list the bodies that we have" and suggest that if they were serial killers, it would be like "Mal or something." They urge everyone to become emotionally detached from their online personas and to create burner accounts to "unmask all of these traders" and to impose the "threat of IRL consequences" because people use anonymity to act behind privilege. They state that Twitter should no longer be a safe place for these individuals and propose that someone should interrupt leadership by saying, "yeah, boss. I I can't do this anymore." They argue the government should consider the impact on families: "My kids and my address just fucking wound up on this platform. How the fuck did they find out who I am?" They insist that every time those people log in, they need to have "second fucking thoughts" and be terrified. They assert that "Security clearances don't mean a goddamn thing to me" and declare, "I guarantee you I'm 10 times smarter than you and your fucking best bet." Speaker 1 interjects: "Back the up, juicy." Speaker 2 responds with distress: "I'm not a Spit on me again." They request to be kept away from the person and say, "This guy's intimidating me. He's pushing me." They ask, "Where's your vehicle?" and answer, "It's in the garage." They further ask, "Hey. What is your name? Are you working for the hotel?" and Speaker 0 says, "I'm working. Tell me. Are" before the scene cuts off. Overall, the excerpt presents a heated monologue urging aggressive online accountability and real-world consequences for certain individuals operating under anonymity, followed by interruptions that reveal a tense confrontation involving intimidation, personal threat concerns, and questions about a vehicle and employment.