reSee.it - Related Video Feed

An Axios reporter identified Mike Donlin, Steve Verschetti, Bruce Reed, Anthony Bernal, the First Lady's chief of staff, the First Lady, and Annie Tomasini as having the most control over President Biden's day-to-day activities. A Washington Post columnist has accused the former First Lady of elder abuse. A congressman stated that it is elder abuse and that these officials need to come before the oversight committee to answer questions. He believes that if the President was not in control of his mental faculties, many of his decisions should be invalidated because the country cannot be run by an "auto pen." He stated that if Joe Biden could not execute the duties of his office, then the decisions made by the Biden White House should be investigated. He considers this a major scandal, potentially the biggest in presidential history, surpassing Watergate.

The committee is investigating the validity of executive orders and laws, questioning who authorized low-level staffers to sign Joe Biden's name on documents, especially when he was not present at the White House. They cite the Hur report, which concluded Biden couldn't remember dates of his election or family events, suggesting he may not have been mentally fit to make these decisions. The committee aims to determine who gave the authority for these executive orders and pardons, given concerns about Biden's cognitive state, particularly after his debate with Donald Trump. They question the reports from physician Dr. O'Connor, who stated Biden was mentally fit, which they now believe to be untrue.

The House investigations into the First Family's international business dealings have seen several developments. One committee is seeking an FBI file alleging President Biden took bribes, while an IRS whistleblower claims there's a cover-up in the investigation. Additionally, a recent Harvard epi on Harris poll revealed that 53% of the public, including a quarter of Democrats, believe that Joe Biden was involved in an illegal influence peddling scheme with his FBI connections. There is evidence of the president's interactions with associates from China, Mexico, Kazakhstan, Russia, and Ukraine. What would you say to the majority of Americans who believe the president is corrupt? FBI.

Republicans are investigating the alleged cover-up of President Biden's mental decline, focusing on those closest to him. The House Oversight Committee is subpoenaing Jill Biden's aide and requesting testimony from figures like Karine Jean-Pierre and Jeff Zients to uncover how the decline was allegedly denied. According to Chairman James Comer, the media and Democrats are not resisting the investigation as they did with the Biden influence peddling investigation. Comer believes a forthcoming book by Jean-Pierre could be explosive, potentially naming names involved in the alleged cover-up. The investigation also aims to determine who was making decisions in the White House and who had authority over Biden's auto pen, including whether Biden knew what he was signing. Separately, the House passed a bill, now in the Senate, with President Trump aiming to have it on his desk by July 4th. Comer notes potential obstacles in the House regarding Medicaid changes made by the Senate. Despite this, he feels confident that House Republicans will ultimately support the bill.

Attorney General Merrick Garland is accused of obstructing the release of audio tapes of Special Prosecutor Her's interview with Joe Biden regarding classified documents. Biden allegedly shared classified information with his ghostwriter and struggled to answer basic questions during the interview, showing signs of dementia. Garland has reportedly classified the tapes as top secret and secured them in a SCIF. The DOJ opted not to charge Biden, citing concerns about his mental competency to stand trial, suggesting he would present himself as a "sympathetic, well meaning, elderly man with a poor memory" to a jury. The White House allegedly altered the transcript of Biden's testimony to make him appear more competent. House Oversight Committee is seeking the audio recordings to investigate Biden's handling of classified documents and his fitness for the presidency. The White House claims the GOP wants to use the recordings for political purposes. The speaker asserts that Biden is losing support due to inflation, Afghanistan, open borders, mental incompetence, and a "fake conviction" of Donald Trump.

A credible whistleblower claims that the Department of Justice has evidence of President Joe Biden's involvement in a criminal scheme with a foreign national. The whistleblower alleges that Biden exchanged money for policy decisions while he was vice president. Senator Chuck Grassley supports these allegations and is issuing a subpoena to the FBI and Chris Wray to release the document. The White House denies the claims, calling them unfounded and politically motivated. Former White House staffers and IRS whistleblowers provide additional evidence of Biden's involvement in corrupt activities. Hunter Biden's finances are also under scrutiny, with potential tax and gun charges being considered. Joe Biden has been absent from the public eye recently.

Biden auto pen thing was Payola. People were paying for pardons. New revelations from the New York Times about Joe Biden and the auto pen scandal. According to New York Times, mister Biden did not individually approve each name for the categorical pardons. Rather than ask Biden to keep signing revised versions, his staff waited and then ran the final version through the auto pen, which they saw as routine. Jeff Zients, former Biden chief of staff, three minutes later, hit reply all and wrote, 'I approve the use of the auto pen for the execution of all of the following pardons.' The final list reportedly included Fauci. 'cash for clemency deal' and 'three people controlled access, and they were making money off of it.' The House Oversight Committee has brought in a number of former Biden aides to speak about this, and this will drive a wave of questions.

I will be heading back to Washington soon to update you on the Joe Biden investigation. Representative Mace pointed out that on the same day the House Oversight Committee received access to special activity reports, Alvin Bragg indicted President Trump in New York. On that day, we also obtained a form from the FBI stating that Joe Biden received a $5,000,000 bribery transaction while he was vice president. This shows an exploitation and abuse of the justice system. To conduct a thorough investigation without interference from the DOJ and FBI, we may need to impeach President Biden. The evidence we have makes this a likely course of action.

The House Oversight Committee is considering holding FBI Director Christopher Wray in contempt of Congress for not complying with a subpoena related to an investigation into the Biden family's finances. The FBI did not physically hand over a document connecting then Vice President Biden to a possible bribery scheme, but allowed committee members to read it. FBI officials confirmed that the document is being used in an ongoing investigation. House Speaker Kevin McCarthy supports the contempt proceedings. There are safety concerns for the FBI informant who provided information about the Biden family, with some fearing for their life if they are publicly identified. A poll shows that 63% of Americans want the FBI to face accountability for weaponizing power against the American people. 39% want Congress to reform the FBI to prevent future political involvement.

President Joe Biden has been accused of lying about his family's involvement in influence peddling schemes and receiving money from China. The House Oversight Committee is releasing subpoenaed bank records that allegedly show Hunter Biden's business entity making direct monthly payments to Joe Biden. Hunter Biden is currently under investigation by the Department of Justice for tax evasion and other crimes. It is claimed that the Justice Department tried to prevent investigators from asking questions about Joe Biden. There is evidence suggesting that Joe Biden knew about and benefited from his family's business dealings, including speaking with his son's foreign business associates and allowing his son to use Air Force 2 for business trips. The House Oversight Committee is continuing to investigate Joe Biden's involvement in his family's business schemes.

House Oversight Committee chairman James Comer has been investigating Biden family business dealings for over 2 years. The probe led to an impeachment inquiry last September. The committee wants Biden to testify, but he refuses. They found $24 million from foreign sources to Biden and his family, with no evidence of legitimate services. Bank records show money from China going to Biden's account, labeled as loan repayments, but no evidence of loans. Comer sent a letter to Biden in March with these findings.

The House Oversight Committee is holding its first impeachment inquiry hearing, with four witnesses scheduled to testify. The White House claims the hearing will only rehash old allegations. Congressman James Omar, the committee chairman, denies this and presents new evidence, including a $250,000 wire from a Chinese national to Hunter Biden while Joe Biden was a presidential candidate. He also mentions a cover-up led by a Department of Justice employee and text messages indicating Joe Biden's involvement in his family's influence peddling. The congressman emphasizes the need to investigate the Bidens' personal bank records and highlights evidence of a cover-up and violations of the Foreign Agents Registration Act.

The transcript centers on a long-form discussion of the Epstein case, the alleged “deep state,” FOIA operations, and political maneuvering around Trump, with frequent calls to aggressively release and pursue Epstein-related documents and other investigations. The speakers assert that the FOIA department is being used to shield deep-state ties and that many federal offices are filled with anti-Trump figures who have prevented full disclosure. - Epstein files and the role of the deep state - The speakers claim the Epstein files are being selectively redacted by FOIA departments to conceal deep-state connections. They state that FOIA personnel are controlled by deep-state actors and that Epstein’s case involves a “fleet of aircraft” and operations linked to major power centers. They argue Epstein’s activities connect to money laundering, information laundering, and a broader set of deep-state assets and operations. - They propose a remedy: appoint Tom Fitton as special counsel on the Epstein files, arguing he “knows how FOIA really works,” understands key personnel, and has litigated Epstein-related cases for years. They assert this would restore public confidence and expedite the exposure of Democratic ties and other actors alleged to be involved. - They advocate for Trump to have executive-privilege-style powers to declassify and release Epstein materials, suggesting a broad interpretation of “Epstein file law” that would allow him to disclose or appoint an ombudsman with power to release materials at will. They emphasize the need to disclose Democratic ties and to hold press conferences when releasing documents, avoiding the use of fake documents or videos. - Specific figures and institutions named - Kash Patel is cited as saying there are “open files on a dozen plus coconspirators” and as someone who has noted alleged misdirections by those handling Epstein-related material. - Kyle Serafin and Phil Kennedy are mentioned as documenting a person at the FBI capacity who is “an anti-Trump advocate,” implying that deep-state appointments control FOIA and related processes. - Speaker 0 and Speaker 1 discuss replacing FOIA and related personnel who are deeply implicated; they specifically name Tom Fitton as the ideal choice and entertain other high-profile figures like Tulsi Gabbard as potential custodians of the Epstein disclosures. - Tulsi Gabbard is described as being in charge of broader investigations tied to the Epstein files and other major political issues (elections, COVID-19, etc.). They also reference “Epstein files” intersecting with other investigations they attribute to the deep state. - Epstein, Maxwell, and allied networks - Epstein is described as deeply embedded with Western intelligence agencies (French, Israeli, UK, and US) and tied to Robert Maxwell, with Maxwell’s daughter linked to Epstein. Epstein is portrayed as having been “recruited by Bill Barr” and as a central figure in a long-running intelligence and blackmail operation. - The discussion links Epstein to Leslie Wexner (Victoria’s Secret founder) and a French talent agency, portraying these connections as part of a large, interconnected network involved in money laundering, arms trafficking, blackmail, and intelligence work. - The speakers insist that Epstein’s activities extended to the late 1990s and beyond, including alleged involvement in “Shutters” in Santa Monica and other high-profile cases, with a consistent pattern of using underage girls and blackmail to exert influence. - They emphasize a broader motive: exposing the “deep state” to vindicate Trump and indict deep-state actors who allegedly engaged in illicit operations, including foreign intelligence services and Western governments. - The broader political frame and potential indictments - The Epstein files are presented as a potential hinge for indicting a wide array of figures across political lines, including references to Comey, Mueller, Hillary Clinton-era actors, and other “rogue actors” who allegedly hindered investigations. - The conversation ties Epstein to broader themes: the 2020 election, COVID policies, and anti-Trump actions by the “deep state.” They contend that the Epstein disclosures could demonstrate the depth of state interference in political processes and media, making Democrats and their institutions targets of accountability. - They argue the Epstien files could show criminal activity by multiple national actors, including Israeli, UK, and French components, and could reveal coordinated efforts to derail Trump and manipulate media narratives. - The Candace Owens angle and related criticisms - A substantial portion of the dialogue critiques Candace Owens, alleging she is running a “CIA-style” operation that distracts from the true conspiracy around the deep state and Tarantifa, and that she manipulates narratives related to Tyler Robinson and Charlie Kirk. - They accuse Owens of shifting narratives, fabricating alibis, and promoting disinformation, calling her a “SIOP” (psychological operation) and alleging her behind-the-scenes connections to MI6 or other international actors through her husband (George Farmer) and other associates. - They recount multiple incidents where Owens purportedly changed stories about meetings, alibis, and involvement in various investigations, asserting she uses “receipts” selectively and inconsistently to support divergent claims. - The speakers allege that Owens’s public warfare against Trump and TP USA is part of a broader intelligence operation intended to disrupt conservative momentum, link to Royal/MI6 circles, and undermine investigations into the deep state and its networks. - Tyler Robinson case and media dynamics - They describe Tyler Robinson as a Middle American figure whose transformation into a political actor is portrayed as a product of online radicalization and Tarantifa-linked influences. They claim there was a concerted effort to spoon-feed disinformation about Robinson and Candace Owens’ involvement. - They argue this is part of a larger pattern of media manipulation and disinformation designed to distract from real conspiracies and to target Trump and conservative movements. - Strategy and messaging guidance - The speakers advocate for Trump to go on the offensive with Epstein, releasing comprehensive, verified documentation, and pushing accountability for “rogue actors” in the FBI, the DOJ, the CIA, and the NSA. - They stress the need for aggressive prosecution and the appointment of trusted figures to lead the Epstein disclosures, arguing that this could restore public confidence and pivot the political conversation toward accountability for the deep state. - They urge addressing the statute of limitations issues in COVID, January 6, and 2020 election-related cases before the window closes in early 2026, warning that delays by Bondi, Blanche, and others could jeopardize prosecutions and political support. - Promotional and logistical notes - The dialogue includes frequent mentions of promoting Alex Jones programs, products, and stores (alexjonesstore.com and infowarsstore.com) to fund operations, along with appeals to listeners to support the broadcasts financially and through purchases, framing financial support as essential to sustaining investigations, media efforts, and broader political action. In sum, the transcript presents an entangled, aggressively conspiratorial narrative: a claim that Epstein’s files illuminate a vast, deeply embedded deep-state apparatus spanning multiple nations and agencies; a call to appoint trusted figures (notably Tom Fitton) to supervise full disclosure; a push for Trump to declassify and publicly prosecute the implicated actors; a harsh critique of Candace Owens as part of a disinformation ecosystem; and a broader strategy to use Epstein, along with related investigations, to dismantle perceived institutional corruption while fueling political narratives and fundraising.

The transcript centers on a heated discussion about President Joe Biden’s health, cognitive fitness, and who was calling the shots within the White House during his presidency. Key points and claims raised include: - The campaign and public discourse about the president’s fitness or age were prominent, with questions such as “Was the number one issue in the campaign the president's fitness or his age?” and assertions about visibility, including whether “you ever see president Biden in a wheelchair?” While some speakers note aging and physical signs—“I noticed that, you know, he shuffled more,” and “he has more stumbling over words and gasps than he did” — others maintain confidence in his capabilities, claiming he was “on top of things” and that “his mental acuity is great. It's fine. It's as good as it's been over the years.” - There are allegations of a cover-up by insiders. The narrative asserts “new information now on the people in his inner circle and how the cover up actually operated,” with “Senior aids that worked here until just a couple months ago, the beginning of this year, manipulating an ailing president for their own gain.” A figure asks, “How much were you paid for your role in the campaign in 2024?” with the response “Just a little bit short of $4,000,000.” The implication is that financial incentives influenced actions. - Internal discussions about the president’s decline and how it was handled are described as ongoing. “The official word from Biden world about all these new stories is that nothing has been revealed this week that shows that president Biden was anything but effective president.” There is mention of a senior-level discussion about whether the president should have a cognitive exam. - Testimony from Annie Thomas Seen, former senior adviser to Biden, is presented as significant. She “has now taken the fifth,” and the transcript notes “There is now a pattern of key Biden confidant seeking to shield themselves from criminal liability for this potential conspiracy.” She invokes the Fifth Amendment when asked about being told to lie about the president’s health. - There are explosive claims regarding Hunter Biden’s role. One speaker says, “Hunter was driving the decision making for the family. He was almost like a chief of staff.” There are references to an uptick in activity when Hunter Biden was around, and discussions about pardons for Hunter, with the line “Yes. Were you in favor of Hunter Biden getting a pardon?” indicating support for clemency. - The “auto pen” controversy is described. Speakers discuss whether the president’s name was “hand signed” or “auto pen” used for documents, with questions such as “Did he hand sign all executive orders?” and claims that “the auto bin” or “auto pen” was used and that some believed others may have instructed staff to use it. There is mention that some staff “did not know who was operating the Obalon/auto pen,” and that “an executive order” and “memo” details existed but were not definitively known to those questioned. - Media portrayal and public perception are addressed. Some speakers accuse the legacy media of denial about cognitive decline, while others defend the president’s sharpness, noting that this debate is framed by evolving video and audio coverage, including discussions of “cheap fakes” versus real footage. - Additional context touches on Medicare drug price negotiations as a policy objective, with a line about “the ability of Medicare to negotiate drug prices with big pharma,” and the belief that “if we finally beat Medicare” would be a significant achievement. There are repeated assertions that those who knew and understood cognitive issues took control, implying a broader conspiracy. - Throughout, witnesses emphasize that their statements are contextualized within interviews and testimony, with ongoing questions about who was directing the White House and the true state of the president’s health and decision-making.

"Senator: 'We discovered is that Anthony Fauci was destroying federal records. He was encouraging other people to destroy federal records. That is a crime.' He testified to the house a year ago and said he wasn't doing that. 'That's a crime to perjure himself.' 'We will bring him back. I've asked him to come and testify this fall. If he doesn't come voluntarily, we will subpoena him.' 'The question is, is he immune because of the pardon? I think that that needs to be challenged in court.' 'I have encouraged the Trump administration that they should prosecute this case and challenge the auto pen. I don't think the auto pen is sufficient.' 'There were so many pardons that I'm not sure Biden was aware of all the people he did pardon.' 'There is not a direct link from the person running the auto pen to the president. The person that was running the auto pen never spoke with the president.' 'And I think a president's signature on something so as important as legislation or a pardon is absolutely required.'" "Susan Monarez will testify before the senate HELP committee tomorrow. This will be her first appearance since being ousted from the role. She will be joined by Deb Aury, a former chief medical officer and deputy director who was one of four CDC officials who resigned after Monarez was ousted." "The chair with the president of Moderna ... I asked him about the expectation that he'll be getting a lot less revenue from the vaccine for COVID perhaps this time around. The scientific evidence shows that the risks of taking the COVID vaccine for children exceeds the benefits, and the scientific evidence is abundant on this. There's a study out of Israel that showed that about six to eight kids 20 that are healthy will get an inflammation of the heart that is very dangerous, and that risk exceeds the benefits of a vaccine. Every kid at six months needs to get a COVID vaccination, and that defies the scientific evidence and shows me that she's not objective. It's the same with the hepatitis B vaccine. Unless the mom has hepatitis B vaccine, disease, there is no indication for the vaccine at birth, and we need to readdress that."

Trump accused Biden's staffers of treason, alleging they took over the White House while Biden was senile and unaware. Claims suggest staffers were selling pardons and using an auto pen to sign bills and executive orders without Biden's knowledge. Mike Johnson questioned Biden about cut off natural gas, to which Biden seemed clueless. Whistleblowers claim Biden was unaware of policies enacted in his name. Ben Hur stated Biden was too senile to stand trial regarding classified documents found in his garage. The speaker believes Democrats expected Biden to die in office and hand power to Kamala Harris, but Biden's continued survival is disrupting their plans. Investigations are underway regarding the staffers, auto pen usage, policies, and executive orders. Ed Martin leaked information that several of Biden's staffers have lawyered up, suggesting wrongdoing related to illegally signed pardons. The speaker asserts widespread corruption and deception among Democrats in the White House.

The White House is using subpoenas to protect the Biden family from investigations. The subpoenas were sent to family members, including the deceased son's widow and her sister. Despite evidence refuting the allegations against the president, the White House is determined to obstruct the investigation. James Comer, who is leading the investigation, criticizes the White House for withholding emails and blocking witnesses. He believes the Department of Justice and the FBI should have conducted the investigation instead. The Bidens are accused of corruption, with allegations involving shell companies and inappropriate relationships. In the midst of this, the focus shifts to the Middle East.

The FBI handed over hundreds of pages of documents, but a source revealed more evidence was in the Southern District of New York. Thousands of pages of documents were then received. The FBI is reviewing them, and Kash Patel will provide a detailed report on why the documents were withheld. The initial documents included flight logs, names, and victim names, but more was expected. The goal is to protect the Epstein victims, of which over 254 have been identified, while also providing transparency. The Biden administration allegedly did nothing with the documents, which raises questions. Redactions will be made to protect victims, national security, and grand jury information. The public will know what is redacted and why, unlike past practices. The speaker believes the American people have a right to know about the Epstein files, the JFK files, and the Martin Luther King files.

House Oversight Committee Chairman, James Comer, is calling on the National Archives to release unredacted records from Joe Biden's time as vice president. The committee specifically wants access to emails related to Hunter Biden, Burisma, and the Biden family's dealings in Ukraine. They are investigating whether there was any policy or influence involved in these deals. The committee has evidence of Joe Biden meeting with his son's business associates and Hunter Biden being informed of his father's government duties in countries where they had a financial interest. They are requesting documents that mention Hunter Biden and his associates, and are concerned about potential compromised national security. This is another move by the oversight committee to prove an alleged bribery scheme by the Biden family.

House oversight chair James Comer discusses the evidence of Joe Biden's involvement in his family's overseas business deals. Comer states that the Biden family received over $20 million from foreign sources, with Joe Biden being the brand they were selling. He mentions emails and text messages showing Hunter Biden paying for things of value for Joe Biden. Comer also addresses the confusion surrounding the impeachment inquiry and the Biden administration's obstruction of information. He mentions the National Archives potentially turning over emails where Biden used fake accounts. Comer plans to subpoena the Biden family's personal bank accounts to further investigate the laundered money. The interview concludes with Comer expressing the need for the impeachment inquiry to speed up the process.

The House Oversight Committee is expanding its investigation into Biden's alleged mental decline, interviewing five members of the Biden administration and deposing former physician Dr. Kevin O'Connor. Chairman James Comer stated that they are serious about the investigation, especially regarding the use of an auto pen to sign executive orders and pardons. Comer said that President Trump has waived executive privilege, and if witnesses don't answer questions or show up for interviews and depositions, they will be held in contempt of Congress. The committee aims to discover who authorized the use of the auto pen, especially since many documents were signed while Biden was supposedly at the White House. Comer believes there was a cover-up of Biden's mental decline and that Anthony Bernal, former chief of staff to Jill Biden, was a major part of that inner circle.

The discussion centers on the legality and appropriateness of Joe Biden's use of an autopen, particularly concerning pardons. It's claimed that the Trump administration believes Biden's autopen use may be unconstitutional if he wasn't fully competent or if others used it on his behalf. A former US attorney claims to have contacted senior Biden officials early on regarding Biden's competence and the pardons, receiving some responses. The speaker argues that incompetence could invalidate contracts and pardons, even though the pardon power is plenary. He alleges a whistleblower from the 2020 Biden campaign identified three "gatekeepers"—Clayne, Anita Dunn, and Bob Bauer—who controlled access and potentially profited from it. While not yet verified, this information is deemed potentially scandalous. The speaker clarified that he contacted the Biden family and others in the US attorney's office.

The speaker questions Joe Biden's fitness for office, referencing an operation at midnight and suggesting Biden was on Ambien. They allege a cover-up by unelected bureaucrats like Anthony Bernal and accuse Corinne Jean-Pierre of lying about Biden's health. The speaker suggests that deleting hard passes of independent journalists indicates an attempt to squash dissenting voices. They find it suspicious that individuals like Anthony Bernal and the doctor are taking the fifth when asked about Biden's mental and physical fitness. They suggest Corinne Jean-Pierre should be called to testify, arguing her claims about Biden's energy levels are either lies or indicative of her own health issues. The speaker believes the committee needs to strategically call witnesses to expose a greater cover-up. They criticize Corinne Jean-Pierre for focusing on photoshoots instead of her job.