TruthArchive.ai - Related Video Feed

Kamala Harris allegedly spent $1 billion of FEMA money on housing for illegal migrants, including gift cards and luxury hotels, while veterans sleep on the streets. The speaker claims this occurred as a hurricane impacted North Carolina, Georgia, South Carolina, Alabama, Tennessee, Florida, and Virginia, and the Harris-Biden administration claimed to have no money for disaster relief because it was spent on illegal migrants. The speaker alleges the administration is trying to get illegal immigrants to vote for them.

The United Nations is providing $1.6 billion to 17 Latin American countries to assist migrants from Venezuela, including illegal migrants, through debit cards funded by US taxpayers. This is part of a larger initiative to spend $1.59 billion to help 3 million people in 17 countries. The UN is supporting and rewarding individuals who have violated US law by facilitating and funding their migration.

Addressing the issue, as a practicing Catholic, I was heartbroken by the statement. The US Conference of Catholic Bishops should reflect on their priorities, especially since they receive over $100 million to help resettle illegal immigrants. Are they focused on humanitarian concerns or their financial interests? We will enforce immigration laws to protect the American people. Donald Trump promised this, and if the bishops are concerned about humanitarian costs, they should consider the children who have been sex trafficked due to the open border policies. I support law enforcement against violent criminals, regardless of their immigration status, to ensure our safety.

Alejandro Mayorkas, the Secretary of Homeland Security, is facing impeachment due to his role in the ongoing border crisis. His connection to open borders began before his current position; he served on the board of the Hebrew Immigrant Aid Society (HIAS), which advocates for open immigration policies. The Biden administration has deep ties to various NGOs that facilitate immigration, including HIAS, which provides resources for immigrants and lobbies for amnesty. HIAS, founded in 1881, has shifted its focus to assist all refugees, receiving significant funding from government grants, including from DHS. Critics argue that these policies contribute to a crisis marked by increased crime and suffering at the border, contradicting the idealistic vision of immigration policy.

The speaker claims the U.S. has given close to $5 billion to the Taliban via NGOs, and this continues. They allege this money cycles back to Washington, with a paper trail that Elon Musk has alluded to. The speaker believes USAID money goes "almost a %" right back to Democrat campaign coffers, with some Republicans also possibly benefiting. They state that Republican leadership is upset about these claims but acknowledges their truth. The speaker also questions how Joe Biden could have reviewed 8,000 pardon files, suggesting "payola" and shadiness in Washington D.C., particularly across various departments.

The United Nations is confirmed to be funding the migrant crisis, as revealed by the Center for Immigration Studies. Public documents show that the United Nations plans to allocate $372 million in cash and voucher assistance to approximately 624,000 immigrants heading to the United States in 2024. This information eliminates any need for speculation, and the article link is provided for further reading.

The speaker discusses how certain policies are contributing to sex trafficking and empowering cartels. They question how a religious organization can justify this. They mention an incident in Mission, Texas, where Catholic Charities took over a park and set up tents to house illegal migrants, claiming it was for COVID safety. However, it was actually to keep the media from seeing the large number of people entering the country illegally. They estimate that over 8 million illegal migrants will enter the US during Biden's term. The speaker believes that these actions perpetuate the problem and benefit the charities financially. They also mention the Catholic church's silence when their own churches were surveilled by the FBI, suggesting that money played a role in their lack of action. The conversation ends with gratitude for bringing attention to this issue.

The speaker believes Afrikaners are not being embraced because of racism. The speaker claims the Episcopal Church, which receives $50 million annually from the Biden administration to facilitate illegal immigration, is refusing to help genuine refugees from South Africa. The speaker accuses these Christians of lacking love for those who don't fit their paradigm. The speaker recalls the Episcopal Bishop of Washington, D.C., lecturing Donald Trump about migrants at his inauguration and patronizingly describing them as people who wash dishes and pick crops. The speaker alleges that the church wants subservient, good people who will vote for the Democrats and who are not white.

Since Joe Biden became president, there has been a surge of immigrants crossing the US southern border. The head of US border control, Alejandro Mayorkas, is an immigrant himself and was on the board of HIAS, a group supporting open borders. HIAS receives over $100 million annually from the government and is helping immigrants cross the Darien Gap to reach the US. Despite this conflict of interest, it is rarely discussed in mainstream immigration debates.

Today, we're investigating where government funds for migrant kids are going. Nonprofits receive billions, with CEOs like Chip Fulghum making $600,000. Endeavors spent $500,000 on music, pet, and plant therapy for kids. Another nonprofit, Southwest Key Programs, led by Dr. Anselmo Villareal, received over a million. Despite issues like sexual abuse charges and fund misuse investigations, they still received $800 million in contracts from the Biden administration.

The speaker discusses a conspiracy involving the US government and NGOs bringing illegal immigrants into the country. A DHS employee reveals how NGOs receive millions of dollars to facilitate this operation. The employee mentions Jewish Family Services receiving $600 million for a few months, with subcontractors requesting more funds. The partnership between NGOs and the government is described as a massive money laundering scheme.

The speaker was asked if there is evidence that Maxine Waters, Adam Schiff, and Chuck Schumer have received money directly from USAID. The speaker responded that taxpayer money is sent to government organizations, then to NGOs, which are government-funded but not governed by U.S. laws. Money is sent overseas to NGOs and the speaker is confident that some of it returns to the U.S. and ends up with the aforementioned politicians. The speaker states that it's not a direct route, but that some members of Congress are strangely wealthy, accumulating millions while earning significantly less annually, which is unexplainable. The speaker says they are going to try to figure it out and stop it from happening.

Biden's USAID has wasted taxpayer money on questionable projects: $1.5 million for DEI in Serbia, $2 million for sex changes in Guatemala, $6 million for tourism in Egypt, and $15 million for contraceptives in Taliban-controlled Afghanistan. This spending is alarming for American taxpayers. President Trump aims to stop such funding, addressing issues like USAID's support for Hamas. The urgency for change has never been clearer, especially after blocking funds that could aid terrorism. The backlash from Democrats and media against figures like Elon Musk shows their discomfort with these reforms. Musk's efforts align with Trump's mission to eliminate wasteful spending and restore accountability in government.

The speaker claims that an analysis of political donations from the State Department, USAID, and the National Endowment for Democracy reveals that 94-98% of donations went to the left. This pattern allegedly extends to international NGOs and contractors, including World Vision and Catholic Relief Services, with over 90% of political donations favoring the left. The speaker suggests these organizations' boards consist of highly paid, prominent individuals. The speaker alleges the left is misusing USAID and taxpayer money across the federal government as a slush fund to finance their own people, creating a one-sided apparatus that funds only one side of the political equation.

Since Joe Biden took office, over 8 million illegal immigrants have crossed the US southern border. Many wonder why the US allows this invasion. Alejandro Mayorkas, the head of the US border, is an immigrant himself and was a board member of HIAS, a Jewish organization advocating for open borders. HIAS receives over $100 million annually from the government and is now found to be facilitating the crossing of immigrants through the Darien Gap. They provide a processing facility, build roads, and produce maps to guide immigrants to the US border. Despite being a conflict of interest, this issue is rarely discussed in mainstream immigration debates.

Illegal crossings at the southern border have decreased by 35% since the start of the Trump administration. According to Todd Bensman at the Center for Immigration Studies, the UN and NGOs have used billions of US tax dollars to support illegal southern border crossings. These organizations plan to spend $1.4 billion in 2025 to support 2.3 million foreign nationals traveling to the US through 17 Latin American countries. Bensman says this collaboration between the Biden-Harris State Department, 230 NGOs, and 15 UN agencies has been ongoing for four to five years, using at least $6 billion to aid migrants on their journey to the US border. Religious groups like Haius, Keritas, Lutherans, and Seventh Day Adventists are involved. Bensman urges the Trump administration to cut off funding to these organizations, which operate waystations from South America to northern Mexico.

David e Taylor got busted by the FBI yesterday. He says that if you talk negatively against him, God's gonna kill you. If they don't hit their donation quota that they have to raise, they have to get on their knees and beg him for forgiveness. He owns a Bentley, Rolls Royce, all in the name of Jesus. $8,300,000, 28,000 square feet was raided by the FBI. He has about 28,000,000 in real estate. He's taking money from the most vulnerable who Christ is there to protect Mhmm. Technically Mhmm. He prays off the most vulnerable. He has people working for free at call centers till 4AM, and if they don't hit their donation quota that they have to raise, they have to get on their knees and beg him for forgiveness. The system is corrupting; we have to separate the church from the building, the true church, the ecclesia. You are the church. This is the darkest place you can start in The US. There’s a tunnel from the church under the border to Mexico. Missing person reports. One of the top five jobs for psychopaths today is clergy, to become a pastor.

The Hebrew Immigrant Aid Society is a major funder of certain individuals who are crossing the border. These individuals are being supported with Jewish money and are expected to cause harm to Fort Lauderdale Synagogues.

The speaker was asked if there is evidence that Maxine Waters, Adam Schiff, and Chuck Schumer have received money directly from USAID. The speaker responded that taxpayer money is sent to government organizations, then to NGOs, which are government-funded but not governed by U.S. laws. Money is sent overseas to NGOs and the speaker is confident that some of it returns to the U.S. and ends up with the aforementioned politicians. The speaker states that it's not a direct route, but that some members of Congress are strangely wealthy, accumulating millions while earning salaries of only around $200,000 per year. The speaker says they are going to try to figure it out and stop it from happening.

The first speaker contends that Congress is trying to give $5,000,000,000 of your money for refugee resettlement programs, and that money ends up in places like this. The second speaker identifies the International Rescue Committee as the largest refugee NGO in the country, noting that they get government funds and subcontract the work out to places like this. The first speaker describes the Somali American Community Center as a location that receives grants from the IRC in order to help refugees resettle in America. The second speaker reports that when they went in, they found this: an almost completely abandoned retail space that hasn’t filed taxes in almost ten years. The first speaker states that almost every business in the area is focused on getting refugees on taxpayer funded welfare programs. The second speaker asserts that this is how the largest refugee city in the country is funded. The first speaker adds that this is how over 87% of Somali immigrants end up on taxpayer funded public assistance. The second speaker notes that they spent three days in Little Somalia in Atlanta, Georgia. The first speaker concludes by saying that in the largest refugee center in the entire country, this is what they found.

Secretary: Today, we are announcing that we have stopped all grant funding that's being abused by NGOs to facilitate illegal immigration into this country. It's amazing to me the hundreds of millions of dollars that have been spent by the federal government that has been sent to NGOs to facilitate this invasion of our country. I have taken action to stop that funding, to reevaluate it, and to make sure that we're actually using taxpayer dollars in a way that strengthens this country and keeps us safe. People are curious how grants given out by federal agencies are utilized, and that evaluation needs to be done. We're not spending another dime to help the destruction of this country. We're going to follow through on what president Trump promised, to secure our border, depart those who are here illegally and committing criminal actions, and ensure taxpayer dollars aren't spent to assist it. Speaker: And, Madam Secretary, I don't think people fully understand the role that NGOs play in facilitating illegal immigration. I want to share these numbers up on the screen: we spend over $380,000,000 in 2024 for sheltering and service programs for illegal immigrants. But the vast network of NGOs that help facilitate it through Panama, through Mexico, and make it a landing spot here in the United States is a massive contributor to illegal immigration. So what you're telling us today is that now stops? At least the federal funding of that stops? Secretary: Yes. The Department of Homeland Security has stopped spending those dollars to fund those NGOs. What’s been revealing is that many of these NGOs actually have infrastructure and operations set up in Mexico on that side of the border, telling illegal immigrants to come to them, and they will get them across the border. So they're not just operating in the United States. They're operating outside of the United States to help make it easier for those who want to break our laws. And while I was one of those Americans years ago when somebody said NGO to me, I thought, oh, that's amazing—a nonprofit telling somebody about Jesus or spreading faith and charitable work, helping people less fortunate. Then I realized over the years it's been perverted into this shadow government. An NGO is sometimes an operation that does things the government cannot do, can't legally do, so they create an entity to use government dollars, taxpayer dollars, to do something that the federal government isn't allowed to do—to perform a shadow government operation that has recently been used to undermine our country's national security.

Since Joe Biden took office, over 8 million illegal immigrants have crossed the US southern border. Many wonder why the US allows this "invasion." Alejandro Mayorkas, the head of the US border, is an immigrant himself and was a board member of HIAS, an NGO advocating for open borders. HIAS receives over $100 million annually from the government and is now found to be assisting immigrants in crossing the Darien Gap to reach the US. They have a processing facility and provide maps in Spanish to guide immigrants. Despite this conflict of interest, mainstream immigration discussions rarely address it.

The speaker describes a massive UN and NGO–driven immigration infrastructure in Mexico and Central America. In Tapachula, Mexico, the UNHCR is constructing a 75,000 square foot “illegal immigration mall” on Mexican land, with the UN and various NGOs under one roof. There is also a large tent city space, indicating a planned, long-term hub for migrants. The speaker notes similar NGO complexes in Colombia and Panama, where NGO villages resemble big swap meets with storefronts for different organizations and permanent billboards directing immigrants to resources needed to continue their journey. They claim hundreds of NGOs operate in the region, including US NGOs, European NGOs, and Latin American NGOs, many affiliated with Catholic dioceses or well-known groups like Doctors Without Borders. These NGOs are described as receiving substantial US taxpayer money to build a cross-border safety net, facilitated by UN agencies and then doled out to national NGOs via US appropriations from the State Department, USAID, and related sources. Financial figures are presented to illustrate the scale: $1.9 billion spent in 2024, $2.2 billion in the previous year, and about $45 billion over the last few years, with 2019 at $377 million in comparison. The speaker suggests this funding is intended to sustain a long-term, high-volume flow of migration from South America to the US border, with Tapachula identified as a key strategic city and the surrounding NGO towns on the migration corridor highlighted as part of the infrastructure. The speaker contends the operations are designed with an expectation of a political outcome, stating they are “betting on a Harris win” and that the system would halt “within an hour of his inauguration” if certain policies were enacted. Specifically, they claim the remain-in-Mexico policy could be immediately implemented, with orders to border patrol and possible invocation of Section 212(f) of the Immigration and Nationality Act to push back and deny asylum to 100% of border crossers. The claim is that this would deter migrants from attempting entry, and that the migrants themselves are closely watching US politics, with many believing that if Trump is in office, entry and asylum access would be substantially harder. The speaker observes that about 50,000 to 60,000 migrants arrive at the border monthly, noting a socioeconomic stratification: wealthier migrants tend to pay human smugglers to reach the border, while the poorer migrants—often from lower-income backgrounds—struggle to finance the final stages of the journey, sometimes needing to borrow or sell assets to reach Mexico, where the poorest end up on the streets in Tapachula. They remark that some nationalities, such as many Chinese and Venezuelans, are described as wealthier within this context.

Speaker 0 explains that transparency has been lacking and that tracking money through organizations is difficult. He says there is now at least a parameter for opacity, and that this parameter must be solidified to understand how money moves internally—through contractors, subcontractors, sub-subcontractors, and networks of friends and associates. He predicts that over the next five years criminal activity will be uncovered as these money flows are examined more closely. Speaker 1 adds that there is a distinction between the border situation and how funds were dispersed north and south. As NGOs realize their federal funding is drying up, he questions whether there is enough momentum or private-sector money to sustain them, and what will happen to groups that no longer receive taxpayer dollars. Speaker 0 responds that hundreds of NGOs will close, noting that hundreds were created specifically for the mass migration crisis—serving as bus companies or as handlers at the border to assist migrants. He implies these organizations were established to address a surge and suggests their disappearance will follow as government funding wanes. Speaker 2 raises the issue of blanket preemptive pardons and asks if there should be an investigation into how the large influx of people—10 to 15 million—came about, characterizing the situation as not chaotic but well thought through. He asks if a thorough investigation is warranted. Speaker 0 calls for a full-throated investigation, including a presidential committee if needed, targeted at the DOJ under the new FBI director and the Attorney General. He argues there should be a focus on the political appointee class rather than only high-level officials like Mayorkas. He references his book, Overrun, Chapter Four, asserting that the situation was orchestrated and engineered at the political appointee level within the Domestic Policy Council, the DOJ, and all DHS agencies. He identifies people brought in from the NGO world, such as Tyler Moran, Esther Olavaria, Lucas Guten Tag, and Amy Pope, claiming they orchestrated the effort and undermined federal law and statutes that require faithful execution of laws. Speaker 2 adds that hundreds of millions of dollars flowed to the former NGO employers, implying a link between the orchestration and financial rewards. The dialogue ends with a continued assertion of movement toward an expansive influx, described as an invasion, and a call for accountability at the administrative and policy-making levels.