reSee.it - Related Video Feed

Palestinian demonstrators accuse Prime Minister Trudeau and his government of genocide. They march through the streets of Ottawa, causing traffic disruptions. The reporters ask Trudeau for comments on various issues, including the presence of a Nazi at a dinner and the WE Charity scandal. They also question the legality and justification of invoking the Emergencies Act. Trudeau remains silent and is criticized for being a narcissist and a sociopath. The reporters request at least a wave from him. The video ends with the comment that Trudeau has no legacy.

Canadians demand transparency in investigating potential traitors. The government is cooperating with the Hogg Commission and providing necessary documents. The National Security Committee of Parliamentarians will also be involved. The opposition should refrain from making baseless claims in parliament.

According to Speaker 0, Canada's new prime minister threatened to seize capital from companies not advancing Canada's climate agenda. Speaker 1 stated the goal is for every financial decision to consider climate change, backing companies that are part of the solution and taking capital away from those who are part of the problem. Speaker 0 claims the prime minister is a fan of censorship and threatened American social media platforms, referencing a statement by Speaker 1 that large American online platforms have become seas of hate and are being used by criminals to harm children, and that his government will act. Speaker 0 asserts there is no free speech in Canada and that the prime minister wants to ban social media platforms, shut down dissent, and use the climate crisis as an excuse to steal from businesses and control their means of production. Speaker 0 concludes that while the friendship between the US and Canada will continue, the "free ride" is over.

The speakers discuss a dangerous and divided world, citing threats from Iran, Russia, and China, as well as changing security and commercial relationships with the United States. One speaker mentions having obtained top secret security clearance within three weeks to be informed and make decisions. He then points out that another speaker has refused the opportunity to obtain top secret security clearance for 950 days. The other speaker explains that while he previously held top secret clearance as a minister, he refused the recent offer because it would have gagged him under security law, preventing him from speaking freely about foreign interference without fear of prosecution. He claims Canada has experienced Chinese interference in two elections. He says that refusing the clearance allowed him to speak freely about issues such as a candidate who allegedly threatened a political opponent, and a quarter billion dollar loan obtained in China. The first speaker responds that robust debate has occurred despite the situation, and observes that China is not the only country accused of foreign interference.

The speaker accuses the government of covering up corruption and obstructing a criminal investigation into the prime minister's conduct. They highlight the prime minister's involvement in the SNC Lavalin scandal and his firing of the attorney general. The speaker criticizes the prime minister's ethical violations and claims that he thwarted a criminal investigation. The meeting is abruptly adjourned, angering the speaker who believes the government is trying to protect the prime minister. They mention the use of cabinet confidence to hide information from the RCMP. The speaker concludes that after 8 years, the prime minister is not worth the cost and promises to speak further on the matter.

The exchange centers on content posted online to the Department of State of Canada and the implications of that content. Speaker 0 questions Speaker 1 about what she posted and asks for a screenshot to verify the online statements. Speaker 1 asserts that she referred to someone as “a Zionist scumbag” and says “he's not my prime minister,” adding, “But really, you're gonna come to my door and you're worried that I'm going to do something.” Speaker 0 notes that there were “threats” and explains the purpose of the visit: to address such threats, which could lead to consequences if continued. Speaker 1 responds that the focus should be on “actual real crime” rather than harassing her over online remarks, and argues that the visit is a waste of tax dollars. Speaker 0 warns that if the behavior continues, there could be an arrest and charge, stating, “if you made some threats that are concerning… you could be arrested and charged.” Speaker 1 demands to see what she allegedly said, asking, “Show me what I said,” and accuses the interaction of harassment and harassment for expressing dissent about the prime minister. The dialogue touches on the nature of the statements. Speaker 1 repeats hostility toward the prime minister and labels the act as “harassing people for what they say online because I don't like our stupid prime minister, and he's a Zionist sunbag,” while Speaker 0 reiterates the right to express opinion but cautions against threats. The conversation escalates with Speaker 1 calling the environment “Communist Canada” and questioning the officers’ pride in their work, challenging, “How do you like working for that?… Do you go back home and look at your family in the mirror and say, this is what you do for a living?” Speaker 0 emphasizes the possibility of documenting the behavior and filing a report if the conduct continues, with a vague reference to “the Trump Blah blah blah blah blah.” Speaker 1 maintains, “I will say whatever the fuck I want about our prime minister. You can't stop my speech. Sorry. Opinion. Yeah. Exactly.” The dialogue ends with Speaker 1 stating, “Okay. Have a nice day. Goodbye now,” and Speaker 0 reiterating the threat assessment: “Be threatening. That's all I'm asking you.”

The speaker expresses disbelief that the government has enrolled in the known traveler digital ID program with the World Economic Forum. They believe the government tries to make people feel embarrassed for questioning their actions. They mention that Justin Trudeau spoke about resetting and reimagining the future after COVID, but then denies any conspiracy when questioned about it. The speaker doesn't care about being labeled a conspiracy theorist and is determined to save their country and inform others. They will continue to speak out and provide information to Canadians about the government's plans.

Constable Ryan Davidson from the Integrated National Security Enforcement Team addresses a post made by the speaker regarding Prime Minister Justin Trudeau. The speaker denies making threats and claims to seek a lawful remedy for what they perceive as a criminal conspiracy with the Communist Party of China. They express concern for the well-being of citizens and offer their services to authorities for a conversation about the issues. The speaker questions the government's transparency, mentioning Jagmeet Singh's alleged ties to terrorism and the lack of clarity regarding money allocation. They emphasize the need for investigation and express willingness to contribute as a concerned citizen.

The speaker claims that every Canadian prime minister has been compromised by agents of influence working for Chinese intelligence. This poses a significant security risk, raising concerns about who is truly in control of the country. They suggest the need for an independent investigation to protect against future threats, citing Australia's law against foreign interference as a model to follow.

The speaker connects Justin Trudeau, Russell Williams, and the Picton Farms, suggesting a conspiracy involving unalivings and donations. They call for a deeper investigation by the RCMP. Another speaker demands Trudeau explain the Canadian flag situation. A third speaker discusses a United Nations peacekeeping helmet's capabilities. Lastly, a speaker emphasizes the importance of vaccination for travel safety.

Speaking from the Truckers Freedom Convoy in Downtown Ottawa, the speaker highlights the Canadian government's actions under Prime Minister Trudeau, which they claim have infringed upon citizens' charter rights and truckers' ability to make a living due to vaccination status. They express concern over the Chief of the City Police for Ottawa's recent announcements, stating that oppressive measures typically seen in oppressive regimes will be implemented. The speaker emphasizes that Canadian's rights to peaceful assembly and freedom of expression are being violated, urging others to spread awareness of the situation.

An open letter to Prime Minister Mark Carney, signed by a retired detective and an active RCMP sergeant, accuses the Liberal government of ignoring national security risks, exposing Canadian intelligence agents, and targeting political opponents. The letter alleges CSIS mishandled the Meng Wanzhou/Two Michaels crisis and provided bad intel to the RCMP, leading to a flawed investigation that attempted to link Conservative party members to Chinese interference without proof. The unredacted documents exposed Canadians involved in covert operations in China. Nine Liberal MPs—Marco Mendicino, Dominic LeBlanc, Bill Blair, David McGinty, Anita Anand, Stephen McKinnon, Melanie Joly, Arif Varani, and Christina Freeland—are accused of inaction or obstruction regarding foreign interference and national security breaches. The RCMP officer who sent the letter had previously informed Trudeau about these issues, but the government allegedly did nothing. CSIS is accused of abusing its powers and smearing innocent Canadians. The speaker urges viewers to research and share this information, citing a lack of transparency and honesty in the Canadian government.

The speaker criticizes the use of the term "conspiracy theory" as a way for politicians to avoid answering questions. They mention a United Nations program that encourages reporting conspiracy theories to editors, which they see as a form of bullying. The speaker, who has a PhD, emphasizes the importance of knowledge and documentation. They provide an example of the government's enrollment in a program called the known traveler digital ID program. The speaker believes that the government tries to make people feel embarrassed for questioning their actions. They mention Justin Trudeau's statement about resetting and reimagining the future after COVID, which some labeled as a conspiracy. The speaker is determined to save their country and inform Canadians about the government's plans. They are not concerned about being labeled a conspiracy theorist.

The speaker from Halton Hills accuses the government of neglecting national security, citing documents that show collaboration between Canadian government employees and Beijing's biological weapons unit. The Health Minister's claim that no sensitive information left the country is contradicted by the documents. The speaker questions if the minister still supports those comments. Translation: The speaker criticizes the government for ignoring national security concerns and collaborating with Beijing's biological weapons unit. The Health Minister's statement that no sensitive information left the country is disputed by the documents. The speaker questions if the minister still stands by those remarks.

I will be questioning the RCMP commissioner tomorrow about why they chose not to investigate Justin Trudeau's actions in the SNC Lavalin scandal. Trudeau pressured Jody Wilson Raybould to offer a deal to SNC Lavalin, but she stood firm. I will ask why Trudeau wasn't charged with obstruction of justice. Stay tuned for updates.

The speaker discusses Canada becoming interesting in January and February due to protesters in Ottawa. The job of reporters, according to the speaker, is to go out and ask protesters why they are on the streets, why they are there with their kids, and why there is a bouncy castle in the middle of Ottawa, to discover the story. The speaker claims the Government did not want that and that the Prime Minister decided in advance that the protesters were all the modern excommunications—Nazis, white supremacists, anti-Semites, probably homophobes, misogynists, probably transphobes, etc.—and then he brings in the Emergency Powers Act. The speaker asks what the mainstream media would do at such a time, and asserts they would question it, but claims the Canadian mainstream media did not and instead acted as an Amen Chorus of the government. Several examples are provided. A CBC host described the Freedom Convoy as a feral mob. A Toronto Star columnist said, “sorry for the language, it's a homegrown hate farm that was then jet fueled by an American right funded rat fucking operation.” The speaker notes that CBC claimed two indigenous women who were scared to go outside in Ottawa because of racist violence did not bother to mention that indigenous drummers had led the truckers in an 0 Canada rendition. The National Observer allegedly stated that many black and indigenous freedom convoy supporters were, in fact, duped by the truckers. A Globe and Mail reporter claimed, “My 13 year old son told me to tell protesters I'm not a Jew” out of fear of antisemitic violence, without mentioning that one of the convoy leaders was Jewish. The speaker argues this demonstrably rancid and corrupt behavior is rooted in a system where in Canada, the media is funded by the government. It is stated that in 2018, election year, there was a coincidence with the government funding; the Canadian media allegedly received $595,000,000 over five years, and the Toronto Star estimated it was going to be getting $3,000,000 from the Government in the first half of the year. The government is described as able to tell banks to shut down people’s bank accounts, and able to tell the media what to do, with the media then doing the bidding of the government camp. The speaker concludes that this is not a free society’s media.

I'm being called a fascist for wanting to stop the war in Ukraine today. I'm against the needless deaths of hundreds of thousands of people and I'm looking for peace, not war. I didn't come here to be aggressive, but a member of parliament started screaming at me for asking a question, which is all on video. I'm just showing what's happening and exposing Charlie Angus for who he is: a member of parliament who screams and swears at Canadian citizens. He slanders people and wants to revoke citizenship of those he disagrees with, yet he calls me a fascist. This group surrounded and shouted me down for simply asking a question. Who are the real fascists here? I have it all on video.

Speaker 0: Hello Mr. Trudeau, Alexandre from Rebel News. I want to quickly address what happened yesterday. You demonized one of the few media outlets that doesn't receive government funding. You expressed your opinion that we spread misinformation. If that were true, the Supreme Court wouldn't have allowed us to be here today. Will you kindly answer my question as the Prime Minister, or will you continue to demonize my profession? I shared my perspective on your organization last night, and I have nothing more to say. It makes one wonder who you really are. Thank you.

We are proud of our influence in government. A constituent asked about outside interference in democracy, specifically regarding Klaus Schwab, head of the World Economic Forum. He claimed that the WEF has infiltrated over half of Canada's cabinet. In the interest of transparency, could you name the cabinet ministers aligned with the WEF's agenda? Order, please. The question is important, but the audio and video quality are poor. I apologize for that. The younger generation, including Prime Minister Trudeau, is involved.

I am here to ask Justin Trudeau basic questions about the carbon tax. Seven premiers oppose the tax hike, including Danielle Smith. The police are behaving strangely, following me and not allowing me to approach the prime minister. We just want answers to questions that Canadians care about. This behavior is outrageous and unnecessary.

The speaker claims that not only the current government, but all previous governments have ignored their warnings about interference. They believe it took so long for this information to come out because of partisan politics and the influence of Chinese intelligence agents. According to the speaker, every prime minister and government office has been compromised, posing a significant security risk for Canadians. They suggest the need for an independent investigation and the implementation of laws similar to Australia's 2017 law against foreign interference to protect the country's future.

Speaker 0 questions Nicole about online posts to the Prime Minister of Canada, asking if she has anything to say about that. Speaker 1 asks for specifics: what post, what she specifically said, and whether there is a screenshot. Speaker 0 cites that she online said something specific and asks for clarification. Speaker 1 replies that she said, "he's a Zionist scumbag, and he's not my prime minister," adding that she believes she is not spoken to properly and questions whether she looks like a threat. Speaker 0 explains that they came to talk because those threats were made. Speaker 1 pushes back, saying that the officers should be busy addressing real crime rather than harassing her over things she says online, and questions whether she seriously looks like a threat. Speaker 0 acknowledges and continues. Speaker 1 accuses the officers of wasting tax dollars and asserts that they should not be harassing her for what she says online because she dislikes the prime minister. Speaker 0 states Nicole should be aware that if such behavior continues, there will be consequences, implying potential arrest for threats. Speaker 1 asks what kind of threats they are referring to and demands to see what she said, noting that she still has not been shown. Speaker 0 attempts to explain what she said and what constitutes threats, warning that if those threats continue, she could be arrested and charged. Speaker 1 complains about being interrupted, asking to show what she said, and then launches into a hostile remark, calling the situation Communist Canada and asking how the officers can take pride in their work. Speaker 0 reiterates that she may have her opinion, but she insists she cannot say what she says. Speaker 1 refuses to discuss further, telling them not to touch her door. Speaker 0 says a report will be filed, stating that the search behavior continues, and mentions Trump in a dismissive way ("the Trump blah blah blah blah blah"). Speaker 1 asserts she will say whatever she wants about the prime minister and that they cannot control her speech, calling it just words. Speaker 0 responds that they are asking for non-threatening language. Speaker 1 concludes by stating they will continue to speak freely and that the conversation is over, wishing them a nice day and goodbye.

A journalist confronts Chrystia Freeland, Canada's Minister of Foreign Affairs, about the government's support for the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRDC). The journalist is then arrested by the police for allegedly assaulting someone. The journalist protests his innocence and requests the microphone to record the incident. He criticizes the government for suppressing freedom of speech and accuses them of prioritizing political correctness over addressing the IRDC's alleged terrorist activities. The journalist expresses frustration with the arrest and claims that Canada is becoming a totalitarian state. The video ends with the police providing a brief statement assuring everyone's safety.

The video features a confrontation between individuals and Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau. The speakers accuse Trudeau of censoring the internet, gaslighting, and dismissing dissenting voices. They also criticize his handling of veterans and accuse him of being a weak leader. The speakers express their anger and frustration, calling Trudeau a narcissist, weakling, and a Nazi. They demand accountability and express their belief in the power of truth and Jesus Christ. The video ends with a confrontation between the speakers and law enforcement officers.