reSee.it - Related Video Feed

Speaker 0: Andrew was the brother of Peter. He was a fisherman, and two had to pay taxes besides Jesus, but I might be mistaken here. Speaker 1: I will reconfirm that it is only Peter and Jesus that paid the tax for adults, and I will reconfirm that the other disciples were apprentices in their family's business and were therefore young as well. All of them were 12 and 15 years old, and I'll stand by that, which poses a lot of other questions. If it's the middle of the night and I walk into the wrong house and I see a 30-year-old man washing the feet of an unknown 12-year-old boy, what am I gonna do? I'm going to jail, guys. Think about these questions because it's not the version we've been told. When you redo the story with their ages in mind, it's a darker picture. Speaker 0: That’s really up for debate. If you apply modern-day Jewish disciples in halakhic schools, you might come to that conclusion. Times then were different. Speaker 1: Actually, scholars—look, I just did an article specifically on this, I have all the receipts. Scholars all agree that the age for discipleship within rabbinical circles was 12 to 15 years old. You could Google it. And, again, the only two people that paid taxes were Peter and Jesus. None of the other ones paid taxes and therefore were not adults. It’s in the scripture. Who cares if they're adults? It doesn't matter. Speaker 2: It’s about being a pedophile. Speaker 1: It’s not; it’s not taken out of context. Speaker 0: Peter, Andrew, James, and John were fishermen, right? Peter was already married; Jesus healed his mother-in-law. He was probably the oldest, mid-20s or 30s. The general consensus is Peter is mid-20s to 30s. John is 15 to 20, the youngest. James, late teens to early 20s. Andrew and Philip, late teens. Matthew, early to mid-20s. The others, Thomas and Judas, mostly teens to early 20s. I’m not sure you’ve seen 16-year-old teenagers like fifty years ago; they were men. It’s a different picture today. So I don’t buy the Jesus was a pedophile claim. Speaker 2: CQ Radio does the same bullshit. Try to make him a pedo. Speaker 1: It’s all about mystery rites and excretion from children in their mystery practices. Like adrenaline, they use children as a sacrament to open the veil. That’s what’s going on with the elites today—the Vatican, Israel, and all the elites. The Bible is a PG version. Wake up and stop attacking me because I’m telling the truth, especially if you don’t have the balls to research it yourself. Speaker 0: What the fuck was that? I’m not attacking you. You can have your own opinion. The general consensus of scholars on the Bible was what I just read—the estimated ages. The youngest were Jesus’ direct family, cousins. Speaker 2: CK will do the same thing—bring up the kid at the Last Supper, and he was doing it. It hinges on a false interpretation of one word. Speaker 1: Arts, magic, occult have two sides: black magic uses trauma, fear, and control to harvest from children; white magic uses unity and consent. They both conjure the same entities. One is loving, one is painful. Look at the ages of the disciples: 12 to 15. Only Peter and Jesus paid the toll; the others were not adults. Speaker 2: Quick question: who do you think is God? What is good in the world according to your worldview? Speaker 1: There is a loving creator. That has nothing to do with what I said. If you equate Jesus with God, that’s a you problem. Speaker 2: Are you going to say what you actually believe? Speaker 1: Move on. There’s a loving creator who created us in his image and loves us. Speaker 3: There’s been a lot of indoctrination of children recently. The biggest discussion is wars. Speaker 1: You can give us a little more. Speaker 3: They’re doxxing this kid. People know. Speaker 1: I’m an alpha warrior. Speaker 0: I have to check the Mossad Media Matrix. Speaker 3: Grandma gave him permission. It’s not going to end well. Speaker 1: I’ll be listening. Somebody can go listen there or you could hide on my page as a handle. You’ll be on my team, though. Speaker 4: Veritas suggested forgiving the heretic, but I don’t think it’s ours to forgive. It’s hubris to think that. We’re trying to have an open debate, but disrespectful behavior isn’t acceptable. Speaker 1: I didn’t mean to be disrespectful. Speaker 4: We can wrestle with scripture without ad hominem. You’re okay to say Muhammad’s a better approximation, but that’s a different topic. Speaker 1: Start by looking into the ages of the disciples. Thank you. Speaker 2: The real concern is elsewhere. Veritas has gone over that research and it suggests the opposite.

The video discusses how Christians are known as the sons of God, fulfilling a prophecy from the book of Hosea. It explains that the name Christian originated in Antioch and was embraced by Europeans, who are believed to be the descendants of Israel. The speaker emphasizes that the name Christian was specifically given to the genetic descendants of Israel, the Europeans, and not to other non-European peoples. This supports the idea that Europeans are the Israelites promised to be called after the living God, Christ.

If Jesus weren't real, Luciferians wouldn't be running the world, dedicated to witchcraft, sex magic, and blood sacrifices. God waged war on witchcraft. Former Satanists admit only true Christians are immune to witchcraft. The gospels don't include a pope or instructions to obey priests, and Jesus said to call no man father. High-ranking Freemasons think people are stupid for not believing in Satan. The speaker describes shocks: the existence of an international secret society, their oaths and rituals, and that this society is Satanism. The biggest shock is Jesus. God came to Earth to be ridiculed and executed to save people. The speaker challenges listeners about their love for sin and idols, asking why God should share his wealth with the unclean and unrepentant. The speaker questions why people focus on suffering while doing nothing to help and points out that the calendar is a testament to Jesus. The speaker says most haven't even knocked on God's door.

His name isn't Jesus, it's Joshua or Yahua. The scriptures emphasize knowing and using his true name, not titles like God. Using the wrong name makes it meaningless and useless, breaking the commandment not to take the Lord's name in vain. Imagine being at the pearly gates and not knowing his real name. It's important to seek and use his true name, not just accept what others tell you.

The speakers discuss views on Christians and Jews. One speaker questions how Christians can believe they killed God, referring to JC, and states that if JC was God, they couldn't have killed him. They mock Christians for celebrating JC's birthday, with one rabbi purportedly saying he's happy that millions of gentiles bow down to one Jew. One person claims they stopped praying to JC after realizing he was Jewish. Christianity is described as having taken elements from Judaism and adding "nonsense." JC is quoted from the New Testament (Matthew 5:17-19) as saying he didn't come to contradict the Torah. The speakers suggest that worshiping God means respecting Jews, as they are God's children. They imply that treating Jews well leads to God, while harming them is detrimental. They claim the Torah says God loves Jews the most and that JC was a Jew.

In this video, the speaker addresses Christian viewers who judge and criticize others. They express their belief that Jesus came to show how to live a life of love, care, and compassion. The speaker criticizes the idea that simply reciting a religious incantation can grant forgiveness and entry into heaven. They argue that Jesus' sacrifice was meant to inspire people to live with loyalty, integrity, and fortitude. The speaker distances themselves from labeling as a Christian but identifies as a devoted follower of Jesus, striving to be the best person they can be. They urge viewers to open their eyes and hearts, and to resist evil.

The speaker rejects Christian supremacy and says they do not hold that view. They express a desire for all people to come to Christ, including their Jewish family members. They affirm that they hope others accept Yeshua as Lord and Savior because Christ is King.

Speaker 1 asks Speaker 0 if they are Christian, noting Speaker 0 attends a Catholic church and is interested in Catholicism. Speaker 1 asks about Catholic doctrines and how they regard Mary. Speaker 0 questions why they are being asked this. Speaker 1 asks if this is a discussion between a Christian and an atheist. Speaker 1 states that Speaker 0 is either Christian or not, but Speaker 0 says they don't have to answer. Speaker 1 says they were under the impression they were invited to speak to a Christian. Speaker 0 says no. Speaker 1 suggests viewers look at the YouTube channel title, implying they are in the wrong video. Speaker 0 states Speaker 1 is not a Christian and ends the conversation.

Speaker 0 begins by challenging the other person’s belief, saying, “He don’t we don’t believe the Jesus, man.” The line signals a heated disagreement about Jesus and hell. The speaker then asserts that the other side believes “that Jesus is burning and shit and hell,” and he agrees with that characterization by saying, “Oh, yeah. Exactly.” This exchange frames the conversation as a confrontation over the nature of Jesus and his fate after death. The dialogue moves to a reaction to the idea of Jesus suffering in hell. Speaker 0 labels the idea as “terrible,” immediately followed by a probing question about why it should be considered terrible: “Why it's terrible?” He clarifies his stance by presenting a broader theological boundary, insisting, “It's not you it's not your god, and it's not my god. It's not the Muslim god.” In this line, he separates gods across religions and implies that the accusation or belief about Jesus burning in hell does not align with his or the other speaker’s understanding of divinity. The question then becomes a direct inquiry about the nature and identity of Jesus: “So what is Jesus? Tell me. What is Jesus? Jesus Christ Jesus. What is fucking Jesus?” The repetition emphasizes the speaker’s demand for a clear definition or explanation of who Jesus is. Speaker 0 proceeds to provide a definitive, though provocative, description: “Jesus Christ is the lord and savior for Christian people.” This statement asserts a canonical Christian understanding of Jesus’ role, positioning Jesus as central to Christian faith. However, the conversation quickly shifts as Speaker 0 challenges the reverence of Jesus by saying, “You're disrespecting him when you're saying that he's burning in hell and shit.” The rebuke reframes the earlier claim about Jesus’ fate as disrespectful to Jesus’ significance in Christian belief. The exchange culminates in a stark declaration from Speaker 0: “Listen. Jesus Jesus is nothing.” This controversial line is followed by an appeal to biblical literacy: “And if you don't if you really, really believe in the bible, you need to understand you believe Jewish man.” Here, the speaker implies that belief in the biblical narrative recognizes Jesus as a figure rooted in Jewish tradition, or perhaps emphasizes Jesus’ Jewish origins as part of understanding his identity within Christianity. The overall conversation centers on definitions of Jesus, the appropriateness of statements about his afterlife, and the contrast between Christian, Jewish, and other religious conceptions of Jesus.

Jesus was a Jewish rabbi living in two thousand years ago. He was a rabbi from the Galilee. He came to Jerusalem. He turned the money tables. I think people forget that the world of Jesus was a Jewish world. His name is Jewish. Jesus is standing in synagogue. He's holding the scriptures. But what are the scriptures? He's holding the Old Testament. He's holding the Hebrew scriptures. For God so loved the world that he gave his only begotten son, Jesus, the Jew. Salvation is of the Jews. The patriarchs, Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob, are all Jewish people. Christian, there's a Jewish man living in your heart. The scriptures are Jewish scriptures. Our Messiah is a Jewish Messiah. As Gentiles we are grafted into the root system of Israel. The church has not replaced the Jews.

The speaker discusses the concept of sin and the teachings of the Maharata texts, emphasizing the Law of 1 and our connection to Source. They explain how these teachings were distorted by the Illuminati to control and manipulate people. The speaker highlights the importance of understanding our true relationship with God and the need to reclaim the original teachings for joyful creation. The distortion of genetic code and planetary grid disruptions led to a loss of awareness of our divine connection.

The speaker emphasizes that Jesus is not the correct name to refer to the divine figure. They argue that the scriptures mention the importance of knowing and praising the true name. The speaker believes that the name was intentionally changed in the past, making it meaningless and useless. They explain that the commandment not to take the Lord's name in vain actually refers to not making the name meaningless. The speaker imagines a scenario at the pearly gates where using the wrong name would result in not being recognized. They assert that the correct name is Joshua and express their intention to meet Yahweh.

Speaker 0 asks if Allah loves all Christians. Speaker 1 responds that Allah loves the believers. They state that if someone does not believe in Allah, there is no reason why Allah would love them. Speaker 0 asks if Speaker 1 loves Christians. Speaker 1 answers that there is an article of faith in Islam which states that you love the believers and you do not love disbelief.

Speaker calls for a respectful conversation despite differences: "You guys for a respectful conversation even though we see things very differently." They say, "I think God has a better plan for you." They add, "maybe you have an encounter with God and Jesus loves all of you. And he'll he can transform your life. He transformed my life." They describe life as "And every day is a new day, and it's a hopeful, beautiful life ahead of you." They state, "God loves every single one of us. We're all sinners, and Jesus died I mean, you've definitely been the most respectful one that I've seen." They credit the Holy Spirit: "it's not me. If it was me, I'd be yelling and screaming. It's the holy spirit." They close with, "Jesus has gone to work on my life." "And so god bless you guys. Thank you for a great Charlie, thank you for coming."

The speaker claims that while other religions are tolerated, invoking the name of Jesus Christ provokes hostility, even to the point of violence from family. Speaking truth is likened to shining light in darkness, leading to persecution and abandonment by loved ones. The speaker stresses that merely identifying as Christian is insufficient; a genuine, personal encounter with Jesus is necessary. Rejecting this encounter will lead to future regret. Jesus Christ is described as the ruler over all earthly leaders, who loved and cleansed people of their sins with his blood. The speaker questions why people fear getting close to Jesus, who represents love, salvation, and redemption, and who sacrificed himself to give people life.

Speaker 0 says they bought this Bible in an antique store, dating roughly 1825 or 1836. The first page has “a map A map? Of Palestine,” which he finds very interesting, and he notes some verses are “gone” or not there anymore, including “Matthew seven verses 21 through 23.” He quotes: “Many will say to me on that day, Lord, Lord, … we used to pray in your name, in the name of Jesus, … Get away from me, you evildoers. You lawless people. You workers of iniquity. Get away from me.” He claims this is Jesus on the day of judgment disowning his own people for not worshipping God, even though they did works in Jesus’ name. Speaker 1 adds: “The key to this is to realize that even Jesus realized and knew that you shouldn't pray to him because he was merely a mortal man. He knew that we needed to pray to a higher power, whether you wanna call it source, God, spirit, nature.” They claim “They removed these verses” to push energy into Jesus and to torture on the cross and through the Eucharist, calling the Bible tainted “to bend to the will of man, tainted to evil” and noting “evil doers who prayed to Jesus.” What do you make of that?

Speaker 0: The speaker discusses content from the Catholic Catechism and a separate critical perspective on Islam. They cite that the Catholic Catechism states the church's relationship with Muslims is part of the plan of salvation, and that Muslims acknowledge the creator, with the first place among whom they are included being the Muslims. They quote: “They profess to hold the faith of Abraham, and together with us, they adore the one merciful God.” They then promote a small comic book called The Prophet by Jack Chick, noting it is available from their ministry for about $2. The speaker uses The Prophet to claim that Catholics started Islam. According to this view, Catholics “started the whole religion,” purposely to recover the holy land for the Catholics. The narrative claims Catholics built up Islam, funded Mohammed, trained him, and even sent a Catholic nun out of a monastery to find a young promising Muslim, marry him, and train him to raise an army of Arabs to take back the holy land for the mother church. The speaker acknowledges this as an interesting story to read if someone wants to explore it further. They assert that it began to work, but eventually Islam grew so large that the Catholics were abandoned by Muslims. The speaker concludes with a generalization, stating that the current global Muslim population—now estimated by the speaker as “10%, 20% of the world population”—is largely unaware that “they really started off as a front for the Catholic church.”

There is a discussion about the concept of three gods in relation to monotheism. The speakers agree that there are three beings with divine essence or nature: the father, son, and spirit. Speaker 1 suggests that while there are three gods in a predicative sense, monotheism can still be maintained if one of these gods is understood to be the primary deity. This primary deity is Hothaios, who is referred to as the father. The focus is on the importance of the three perfect deities in the trinitarian belief.

Jesus Christ is the King of Kings and the Lord of Lords, revealed in the flesh over 2000 years ago. He died on the cross, rose from the dead, and will come back to judge. The speaker invites people to accept Jesus as their savior, claiming no other way to eternal life exists. They express fearlessness in the face of death, as meeting Jesus is the ultimate goal.

Speaker 0 summarizes controversial religious claims surrounding the Pope kissing the Koran and the Catholic Church’s relationship with Islam. He notes the Catholic Catechism, specifically eight forty one, which states “the church's relationship with the Muslims is the plan of salvation also includes those who acknowledge the creator,” and adds that “The first place among whom are the Muslims.” He emphasizes that “These profess to hold the faith of Abraham, and together with us, they adore the one merciful God.” He references an inexpensive comic book called The Prophet by Jack Chick, which he says is “an excellent little bitty comic book” available from his ministry. He describes Chick’s presentation of the history of Islam, claiming that “Very few people realize it was the Catholics that started Islam.” According to the account, Catholics “started the whole religion purposely to try to get the holy land back for the Catholics,” and they “built up the Islam. They funded Mohammed. They trained him. They sent a Catholic nun out of the monastery.” He recounts the alleged directive: “we want you to come out of your convent. Go find a young promising Muslim, marry him, and train him to raise up an army of Arabs to go take back the holy land for the mother church.” The speaker concedes the story is “Quite an interesting story if you wanna read about that.” He states that “it started to work, but then it failed because Islam got so big, they said, well, forget you, Catholics. We're doing what we want.” He concludes with a provocative assertion about contemporary Muslims, estimating Islam to comprise “now, what, 10%, 20% of the world population,” and adds that “I don't think most of them know that they really started off as a front for the Catholic church.”

If God is real, the speaker questions the validity of other gods, contrasting them with Jesus Christ. They ask if Buddha performed miracles or if Muhammad did anything besides corrupting the gospels. They highlight Jesus's sinless life and sacrifice, contrasting it with Muhammad's lifestyle. The speaker challenges the listener to find testimonies of life-changing experiences in other religions comparable to Christian testimonies. The speaker critiques society, TV, doctors, and scientists as priests of a cult, and atheists for their faith in unproven theories like evolution. They emphasize the power of evil to corrupt good, comparing it to a drop of poison in water. The speaker shares their past as a liar, pervert, and drunkard, and how God transformed them. They urge listeners to wage war on sin and believe, warning against the distractions of the world. They conclude that finding the kingdom of God is difficult, like loving one's enemy, but it is the road to life.

Lucifer is identified as Jesus in the Bible, specifically in Revelation 22:16, where Jesus refers to himself as the offspring of David and Lucifer. This suggests that Christians may unknowingly be worshiping something they perceive as opposite. The same applies to Jews and Muslims, implying that the entire world is engaged in worship that could be considered satanic. This worship is believed to be influenced by higher powers in the universe, leading humanity towards something sinister. Understanding this dynamic is crucial, and there are resources available that aim to unveil these truths.

The speaker emphasizes that salvation is not based on one's goodness or works, but on belief in Jesus Christ. They explain that everyone has sinned and deserves punishment, but Jesus died for our sins and rose again. Believing in Jesus is the only requirement for salvation, and once saved, one cannot lose their salvation. The speaker warns against trusting in one's own works and highlights that many who claim to believe in Jesus will not enter heaven because they relied on their own deeds. They conclude by stating that once Jesus knows someone, they are saved forever.