TruthArchive.ai - Related Video Feed

In front of the Capitol building, Ukraine 24 Television interviews two people who don't speak English. The interviewer asks about the coverage and ownership of the channel. The interviewees confirm it is a private channel but don't know the owner's name. The interviewer suggests it might be Pinchuk, a Ukrainian oligarch. The interviewees confirm they are in America and that Ukraine 24 is a private Ukrainian television channel. The interviewer concludes that the transparency of such channels is why the first amendment exists in America.

I'm heading to Donetsk, where children have died due to U.S. funding of this war. I want to inform Americans about the reality here. I'm not scared yet, but we'll see how I feel when we arrive. If anything happens to me, it will be because of American and Western weapons. My name is Tofurius Maximus Crane, a 45-year-old independent journalist from the U.S. I previously worked in medical management but was deplatformed for criticizing my government. My family immigrated from Russia over a century ago, so returning feels like coming home. Standing in a sunflower field, I reflect on the acceptance I've received here, despite my country's aggressive stance and the harm caused to Russian civilians. It’s surprising to be welcomed given the circumstances.

Mister Fink, will you follow Trump's plan to eliminate DEI and ESG in your companies? BlackRock seems authoritarian and unaccountable. Have you spoken to Trump since his election? Why are you avoiding straightforward questions? Are you more powerful than Trump? Many states are divesting from your ESG initiatives, which seems disloyal to shareholders. Why do you think BlackRock is so disliked? Do you feel above accountability? Your bodyguards' aggressive behavior towards journalists raises concerns about your respect for the public. What are your future ambitions? Do you plan to run for office, or do you prefer to control from behind the scenes? Your actions suggest a troubling mindset. I'm Ezra Levant, and I ask questions about BlackRock. And I'm Avi Umini, committed to uncovering the truth, regardless of intimidation. Check out our reports from Davos at wefreports.com.

Speaker 0: The officer tells him to get a life, but the journalist insists that investigative reports are important for the country. Speaker 0 questions the journalist's credentials, but the journalist continues to ask questions. The journalist offers to provide all the material via email.

Jeremy Schwab, from Japan, identifies himself and asks for a comment, but the people being approached are in a rush. “We’re on our way to the next thing. We’re a bit late,” they say, and they thank him as they decline to stop. Despite the time pressure, Jeremy presses to ask one more question: “I have to ask. Thank you. Thanks, Thank you.” The interaction remains brief and cordial, with the interviewer explaining the constraints of the moment. When Jeremy asks, “Which media are you with?” the response is: “I am an independent journalist from Japan.” The exchange continues with gratitude from the interviewers, who acknowledge the request but reiterate the lack of time. They say, “No. Thank you very much,” and “But I I I wanted to ask just just one more. One question.” They express appreciation for the attempt but emphasize their busy schedule: “We’re in a big rush. We’ve got so many things tonight.” They remark on the significance of “Precious moments” and acknowledge the difficulty of stopping for every inquiry, noting, “You can I can he’s got so many people stopping that if you were to stop for everything Yeah? We win.” The speakers convey a sense of regret about the refusal to engage further, stating, “That’s the unfortunate. So I’m very sorry, but thank But Thank you for trying.” The dialogue then shifts in a fragmented way, with one speaker asking, “Do do you know the voice that worry about globalism? Thank you. Yeah.” There is a mention that someone is “meeting on the phone,” followed by a courteous sign-off: “Nice evening. Thank you. Thank you.”

I'm Marina Perkis and I'm tired of the propaganda and misinformation in the news. I want meaningful debate and accountability. Byline TV is the solution. Their reporting on Brexit was popular because it revealed the truth and let those affected share their stories. Byline TV challenges falsehoods and doesn't have an agenda or questionable funders. They rely on their members for support and need help to change the conversation. Visit byline.tvforward/joy to contribute.

In this video, Ava and I will be discussing our investigation on Stand Up Week 2023. Stay tuned for more details.

The speaker discusses Alexis Wilkins, CEO of PragerU, suggesting a connection to Kash Patel. Wilkins, originally Marissa Street, was born in Los Angeles but moved to Israel at a young age. She received her primary education in Israel and then served in military intelligence unit 8200 of the IDF. Unit 8200 is described as the most advanced global cyber team. The speaker sarcastically suggests Wilkins' relationship with Patel is genuine and denies any possibility of her being his handler.

The speaker is in Davos for the World Economic Forum. They mention the snowy weather and the unique experience of the event. The speaker has meetings with EU members to discuss a potential free trade agreement. They also have a panel discussion on measuring economic progress beyond GDP. The speaker has media interviews and participates in an informal gathering on global trade. They attend a panel on mental health with Prince William and meet someone working on mental health in Africa. The day ends with a dinner hosted by Google. The speaker mentions their jet lag and the cold weather. They express excitement about promoting New Zealand's interests and hope to share photos and updates later.

Shade Sacker is the blonde woman seen in the video. She has been claimed or painted as a CNN reporter, but she is actually an investigative reporter. She has done work in Syria and Cambodia. After returning to the US, she was assigned the project with the speaker and John. She has had to go and form a false friendship with the speaker’s brother in order to get information out of him. Because of this, she has even more confidential information that a lot of people don’t have, since she’s been able to gain the speaker’s brother’s trust. The speaker wanted to clear that up. The speaker says she is amazing, and notes that they’ve had the opportunity to work with her. She’s done a lot, and the speaker emphasizes that she’s done a lot of work.

Joining us tonight to talk about this and everything else, Dom Luker. Hey. Thanks. Thanks for having me. Who are you? What do you do? I'm a investigative journalist, just independent journalism, mainly known on x. Right on. I hear you're the breaker of narratives. Yeah. That's what people say. Alright. People say. So so you're you're here? We'll we'll, we'll see what narrative get broken. Yeah. For sure. I'm definitely excited to break some. Alright.

Speaker 0 introduces Desiree as an outspoken whistleblower who has challenged the Davos elite, asserts that old systems are not fit for the twenty-first century, and asks how Desiree helped build the WEF’s great reset. Speaker 1, Desiree, recounts that in 2020 she obtained her dream job as chief sustainability officer at Deutsche Bank. She states that while in that role she witnessed fraud and describes the annual report as a “legal living document” filled with lies. She says that a couple of weeks after she spoke out, she was fired, and shortly after, the annual report was released with “all the lies.” She describes a subsequent “horrific smear campaign” and notes that within two days, U.S. authorities contacted her, including the SEC, the FBI, and the Department of Justice. She mentions that they asked her questions, implying inquiry or investigation directed at her claims. Speaker 0 questions whether Desiree is advancing the view that “they’re controlling the world.” Speaker 1 asserts that the WEF is vast and that its tentacles affect every part of life. She claims that this situation is not stakeholder capitalism but socialism, accusing the WEF of lying to the public. She contends that the Davos agenda involves more than net zero and asserts that it is connected to a “climate crisis” manufactured by a “multi trillion dollar industrial complex.” She reiterates that the Davos agenda is about more than climate goals and frames it as a broad, powerful economic and political enterprise. Speaker 0 asks Desiree whether she ever met Claus Schwab and whether she has anything to say about the encounter. Speaker 1 responds with a brief affirmative, saying “Yes,” to having met Schwab, and adds “Truthfully” when asked for further remarks about the meeting. Summary of key points: - Desiree’s career move to Deutsche Bank in 2020 as chief sustainability officer and her claim of discovering fraud and a lies-filled annual report. - Her claim of being fired and subjected to a smear campaign, followed by inquiries from U.S. authorities (SEC, FBI, DOJ). - The assertion that the WEF’s influence extends across life, characterizing the Davos agenda as socialism rather than stakeholder capitalism, and alleging a manufactured climate crisis tied to a multi-trillion-dollar industrial complex. - The claim that the Davos agenda encompasses more than net zero and entails broader power and influence. - Desiree confirms she met Claus Schwab, with a brief, candid acknowledgment.

Jeremy Schwab, an independent journalist from Japan, attempts to engage with a respondent for a comment. He reiterates his identity by saying he is from Japan and that he is an independent journalist. The respondent signals that they are currently moving on to the next thing and are running late, indicating they cannot stop for comments at that moment. Despite the time pressure, Schwab thanks the person for their time and expresses appreciation. The interviewer asks which media outlet Schwab is with, and Schwab answers that he is an independent journalist from Japan. The interviewer again thanks him and acknowledges the situation with polite farewells. Schwab expresses a desire to ask just one more question, even as he prepares to move on, and thanks the interviewer once more while indicating that he will simply walk up and ask. The conversation reveals that the interviewer is in a rush, with multiple engagements or commitments that night. Schwab recognizes the constraint, noting that there are “so many things tonight” and that the moments are precious, implying the difficulty of obtaining interviews in a busy schedule. The interviewer reflects on the reality that if they stopped for every inquiry they would be overwhelmed by the volume of interactions, describing it as an unfortunate situation. Both parties exchange thanks, and Schwab again attempts to pose one more question despite the time pressure. The interviewer acknowledges the challenge of accommodating many people asking for comments and thanks Schwab for trying. The exchange ends with Schwab asking, “Do you know the voice that worry about globalism?” followed by a courteous closing of “Thank you” and “Nice evening.” In summary, the exchange centers on a brief, time-constrained attempt by a Japan-based independent journalist to obtain a comment from an interview subject, set against the practical realities of a busy schedule and the difficulty of stopping for multiple inquiries. The dialogue includes a final, somewhat unclear question about “the voice that worry about globalism.”

The speaker criticizes reporting through social media and influencers, urging people to disconnect from their devices. Another speaker discusses the challenges of media coverage in West Maui and asserts their right to freedom of the press. A third speaker questions why the government is concerned about documenting events and emphasizes the desire of locals to uncover the truth. Despite facing obstacles and feeling unsafe, the speaker expresses gratitude for the support received from viewers, who serve as a safety net by sharing and engaging with the content.

I'm a vlogger meeting three people from Leeds in one room. They're surprised to be on YouTube and chat casually about their hometown.

Tommy Robinson arrived in Israel on an official invitation from Israel’s minister of diaspora affairs, Ami Chikli, described as a major moment for free speech and truth telling on the world stage. The accompanying interview sets up a live-followed tour at tommyinisrael.com. Avi expresses his own perspective: he’s happy to be there and hopes to show solidarity with strong leadership, praising Netanyahu while criticizing Britain’s government for recognizing a “terrorist state” and claiming it was elected with only 20% of public votes. He warns that the 80% not supporting the government likewise do not support recognizing a terrorist state, and asserts that the problems Israel faces—security issues for Jews in Israel—are the problems Europe will face as Islamic extremism is empowered and “leaders have gotten their knees to them.” He recalls Jews being dragged out of Gaza as part of a peace deal and says Israel cannot be appeased. He frames his visit as friendship with Israel, a beacon of freedom and democracy, in contrast to surrounding states described as human rights violators and jihad states. He adds that Britain will face similar issues. The two discuss money and media. Mossad allegedly ran out of money, joking that Avi has been sent instead; they deny being paid by Israel or any organization and say they are not paid to cover the trip. They say Rebel’s coverage aims to counter BBC/Sky “fake news” narratives. A website, tommyinisrael.com, is launched to give a front-row seat to Tommy’s tour, with a call to followers to help cover the travel costs, including a humorous note about seven-thousand-dollar per post. They state they have not received funds from Israel and are covering their own travel and hotel expenses, without government or NGO support. Avi notes that Tommy has become “enemy of the state” in Britain but a “friend of the state” in Israel, and possibly in other countries, recounting an incident in Panama where authorities refused entry and deported him until the mayor intervened with an apology and security escort. They describe a growing public interest, with airport footage showing people recognizing Tommy Robinson and welcoming him; even some protesters on the left express positive sentiments. They encourage following the full tour on tommyinisrael.com and subscribing to updates, and reiterate the personal financial cost of the trip—about ten thousand dollars between the two of them for flights, plus hotel expenses—emphasizing they are funding the trip themselves.

Speaker 0: Participating in the ambassador summit this week, with a thousand pastors crossing the sea to stand with Israel faithfully. Speaker 1: Here for seven days to support Israel, aiming to educate the younger generation on what it means to stand for Israel. Speaker 0: They are not alone; there is a coalition to be a voice for Israel and the nations, an honor, and a call to awaken more courage inside believers worldwide to speak up for Israel; there is a lot to learn and to be present for. Speaker 1: They expect to do this; it is life changing, and they are excited about going back home and taking it back home with them. Speaker 0: To stand here and be an advocate for Israel and for the God of Abraham, Isaac and Jacob in the midst of this land is truly an honor.

There is good journalism happening, especially from independent sources like Whitney Webb. She is knowledgeable about powerful people and how they have manipulated events throughout history. Focusing on "evil oligarchs" and "bloodlines" makes someone a target. It is believed she lives in another country. She has appeared on shows like Patrick Bet David and Jimmy Dore.