reSee.it - Related Video Feed

Megyn Kelly discusses a significant day for Donald Trump in the 2024 presidential election, focusing on a hearing that could potentially expose misconduct by Fulton County DA Fanny Willis and special prosecutor Nathan Wade. Allegations suggest that Wade engaged in a kickback scheme with Willis, whom he allegedly had an affair with, raising questions about conflicts of interest in the prosecution of Trump. Testimony from Robin YY, a friend of Willis, claims the affair began in 2019, contradicting the prosecutors' statements that it started in 2022. The defense has obtained phone records showing over 2,000 calls and nearly 12,000 texts exchanged between Wade and Willis before their claimed affair began, suggesting a close relationship. The judge's ruling allows for further examination of Terrence Bradley, a witness who has previously expressed reluctance to testify. The stakes are high, as the judge could disqualify both prosecutors if they are found to have lied under oath about their relationship. Kelly emphasizes the ethical implications of prosecutors lying to the court, which could lead to serious consequences, including disbarment. Phil Holloway, a legal expert, joins the discussion, highlighting the importance of due process and the potential need for a new prosecutor if Willis is disqualified. The conversation shifts to the broader implications of the case and the political motivations behind it, with Kelly suggesting that Willis's ambition may have influenced her handling of the prosecution. Later, Kelly covers the tragic case of Laken Riley, a nursing student murdered by an illegal immigrant, discussing the implications of immigration policy on public safety. Mary Katherine Ham joins to analyze the political responses to the incident, criticizing the left for downplaying the connection between illegal immigration and crime. The discussion also touches on the disturbing reactions to the self-immolation of Aaron Bushnell, who protested against perceived injustices in Palestine, and the valorization of his act by some political figures, raising concerns about mental health and societal values. The episode concludes with reflections on media bias and the challenges of free inquiry in journalism, particularly in light of recent controversies surrounding the New York Times and political discourse.

Megyn Kelly discusses a significant hearing in Fulton County regarding former President Donald Trump, focusing on testimony from Terrence Bradley, a friend and former lawyer of special prosecutor Nathan Wade. Bradley's testimony was marked by evasiveness and a lack of recall, raising suspicions about his credibility. He claimed not to remember key details about the romantic relationship between Wade and Fulton County DA Fanny Willis, despite having previously communicated specifics via text to defense attorney Ashley Merchant. Kelly highlights that Bradley had previously told Merchant that the affair began before Willis hired Wade, contradicting their sworn statements. The texts exchanged between Bradley and Merchant reveal that he was confident about the timeline and details of the relationship, including where they met. Despite this, on the stand, Bradley claimed he was speculating and could not recall the information he had previously provided. The judge ruled that Bradley had to testify, dismissing claims of attorney-client privilege. Kelly emphasizes that the texts serve as substantive evidence that contradicts Bradley's courtroom testimony. Phil Holloway, an attorney and guest on the show, notes that the text messages are crucial for impeachment, as they show inconsistencies in Bradley's statements. He explains that the judge can consider these prior inconsistent statements as evidence, potentially impacting the case against Willis and Wade. The discussion also touches on the implications of the Georgia State Senate's investigation into the Fulton DA's office, which has issued subpoenas for text communications related to the case. Holloway suggests that if the judge finds evidence of fraud, it could have serious consequences for Willis and her team. The conversation concludes with speculation about the motivations behind the prosecution and the potential need for an independent investigation into the conduct of those involved.

Megyn Kelly discusses significant legal developments involving President Trump and the Georgia case led by prosecutor Fanny Willis. Trump is appealing a ruling regarding his claim of immunity from criminal prosecution for actions taken while in office, with skepticism from the DC Circuit Court. Meanwhile, allegations have emerged against Willis from a Trump co-defendant's attorney, Ashley Merchant, claiming she is in a romantic relationship with special prosecutor Nathan Wade, which could lead to ethical breaches and potential criminal charges against her. Merchant's motion suggests that Willis's actions may compromise the integrity of the case against Trump and other defendants. Victor Davis Hanson joins the discussion, expressing skepticism about Willis's integrity and the political motivations behind the case. He notes that if the allegations against her are true, it could undermine the prosecution's credibility and have broader implications for other politically motivated cases against Trump. The conversation touches on the political landscape, with both hosts noting that the scrutiny of prosecutors like Willis may reflect a growing public awareness of perceived abuses of power in the legal system. The discussion shifts to former First Lady Michelle Obama, who has expressed concerns about the upcoming election and the importance of leadership. Kelly and Hanson analyze her recent comments, suggesting that her resurfacing in the political conversation may indicate a potential future role in politics, although they remain skeptical about her actual candidacy. The hosts also discuss the Republican primary landscape, highlighting Nikki Haley's rising poll numbers in New Hampshire and the dynamics of the race. They speculate on the potential for other candidates to drop out and consolidate support against Trump, while acknowledging the challenges of overcoming his established base. The conversation concludes with reflections on the broader implications of the current political climate, including the potential for a third-party movement to emerge as a response to dissatisfaction with the two-party system.

Megyn Kelly opens the show discussing various legal cases, including the Kansas City Chiefs fans found frozen outside a friend's house, and the trial of Michelle Traconis, the alleged affair partner of a man accused of murdering his wife. Traconis is on trial for allegedly helping dispose of the victim's belongings after the husband died by suicide. Kelly emphasizes the importance of free speech, promoting a bottled water company, Freedom 20, which supports the right to offend and express oneself. She then introduces her guests, Arthur Idala and Mark Eiglarsh, who discuss a recent incident in New York City involving migrants arrested for allegedly assaulting police officers. The guests express frustration over the leniency of the judicial system, particularly regarding bail policies that allow suspects to be released without bail. The conversation shifts to the case of Daniel Penny, who is facing charges related to a subway incident. Idala highlights the disparity in treatment between Penny and the migrants who assaulted police officers, noting the lack of accountability for the latter. The discussion touches on the broader implications of crime and bail reform in New York. Next, the hosts discuss a bizarre case involving three Kansas City Chiefs fans who died from fentanyl overdoses after visiting a friend known for making drug cocktails. Toxicology reports reveal the deceased had lethal doses of fentanyl in their systems. The conversation raises questions about the responsibility of the friend, dubbed "the chemist," who was inside the house during the incident. The dialogue transitions to the ongoing legal troubles of Fanny Willis, the Fulton County District Attorney, who is facing scrutiny over her personal relationship with a special prosecutor involved in the Trump case. The hosts speculate on whether this relationship could affect the integrity of the case and whether she should recuse herself. The show also covers the trial of Jennifer Crumbley, the mother of a school shooter, who is being charged for her alleged negligence in not recognizing her son's mental health issues and for providing him access to a firearm. The guests debate the merits of the prosecution's case against her, with differing opinions on parental responsibility in such tragic circumstances. Finally, the discussion shifts to Alec Baldwin, who has pleaded not guilty to involuntary manslaughter charges related to the shooting of cinematographer Halyna Hutchins on the set of "Rust." The hosts analyze the complexities of the case, including the responsibilities of actors and crew members regarding firearm safety on set. The episode concludes with a focus on the Alec Murdoch case, where a judge denied a motion for a new trial despite juror testimony suggesting influence from a court clerk. The guests reflect on the implications of the case for the legal system in South Carolina and the importance of accountability within the profession.

Megyn Kelly opens the show discussing significant legal headlines, including the Fanny Willis hearing in Georgia, where concerns arise regarding potential ethics and criminal issues following her testimony. Judge Joe Brown shares insights on Willis's testimony, highlighting possible IRS violations and ethical conflicts, particularly regarding her financial dealings and a romantic relationship with a special prosecutor. He emphasizes her failure to disclose this relationship to the court, which could lead to serious repercussions under Georgia's RICO statutes. The conversation shifts to the emotional distress lawsuit filed by Gabby Petito's parents against Brian Laundrie's parents, alleging they failed to inform them about their son's involvement in Gabby's death. The discussion touches on the complexities of parental responsibility in such cases, with both sides expressing empathy for the Laundrie family while questioning their actions. The Rust shooting case involving Alec Baldwin is also examined, focusing on the trial of armorer Hannah Gutierrez Reed. The prosecution aims to establish her negligence in ensuring the safety of firearms on set, while the defense plans to point fingers at others involved in the production. The conversation highlights the challenges of proving criminal negligence and the implications for Baldwin's upcoming trial. Lastly, a lighter topic emerges regarding the trial of One Taste, a sexual wellness company accused of operating as a cult and pressuring employees into sexual acts. The panel questions the viability of criminal charges in this context, suggesting that the case may be more suited for civil claims related to employment discrimination. Throughout the show, the panelists engage in lively discussions, providing legal insights and opinions on the various cases, while Kelly keeps the conversation focused and engaging for the audience.

Megyn Kelly discusses significant developments in the Fanny Willis case with attorney Phil Holloway. Trump's defense team filed a brief revealing extensive cell phone records showing over 12,000 text messages and 2,000 voice calls between Willis and investigator Nathan Wade in 2021, contradicting their claims of a platonic relationship. The data suggests overnight visits, raising questions about their testimonies under oath. Holloway emphasizes the implications of potential perjury, stating that if they lied about their relationship, it could undermine their credibility in court. The DA's office is crafting a response to challenge the interpretation of the data, asserting that their relationship did not become romantic until after Wade was hired. Holloway believes more evidence will emerge, potentially revealing further misconduct by Willis, which could jeopardize her position and the integrity of the prosecution.

Megyn Kelly opens the show discussing the New Hampshire primary, highlighting Nikki Haley's campaign and her recent victory in Dixville Notch, where she received six votes against Donald Trump. The conversation shifts to the significance of this primary for Haley, with New Hampshire Governor Chris Sununu emphasizing the importance of a strong showing. Rich Lowry and Charles C.W. Cooke join the discussion, expressing skepticism about Haley's chances against Trump, who leads significantly in the polls. Lowry notes that polling in New Hampshire can be unpredictable, but the momentum appears to favor Trump. Cooke agrees, suggesting that it feels inevitable Trump will be the nominee, despite potential legal challenges he may face in the coming months. They discuss Haley's shifting messaging, with her now claiming she is running to win rather than just to perform well. Lowry believes Haley's chances are slim and predicts she may drop out soon if she does not secure a strong result. The conversation then turns to Ron DeSantis, with Cooke reflecting on his campaign's failures and mistakes, particularly his inability to connect with voters and his focus on niche issues rather than broader concerns. They discuss the importance of charisma and performance in presidential campaigns, contrasting DeSantis's executive abilities with his lack of engaging communication skills. As the discussion progresses, they touch on the implications of Trump's legal troubles and how they may affect his candidacy. Lowry argues that the indictments could energize Trump's base, while Cooke expresses concern about the potential fallout from these legal issues among moderate voters. The hosts then pivot to the border crisis, discussing a recent Supreme Court ruling that favored the Biden administration over Texas's efforts to secure its border. They criticize the federal government's handling of immigration and the political ramifications for the Democrats, noting that the issue is becoming increasingly pressing for voters. Finally, they address the ongoing developments in the Fanny Willis case against Trump, highlighting allegations of impropriety involving Willis and a special prosecutor. The discussion raises questions about the integrity of the prosecution and its potential impact on the case against Trump, with both Lowry and Cooke expressing skepticism about Willis's ability to continue as the lead prosecutor. The episode concludes with a reminder of the importance of the New Hampshire primary results and their implications for the Republican race.