reSee.it - Related Video Feed

It is disturbing to see other groups becoming involved with AIDS as the months go by, including children. Close contact can lead to AIDS. For example, if a child's close contact is a household contact, there will be cases of individuals living in close contact with someone with AIDS or at risk of AIDS. This contact does not necessarily have to be intimate sexual contact or sharing a needle, but just ordinary close contact.

The speaker states that a disease, surmised early on, began in the male homosexual population in the U.S. The speaker clarifies that this was not due to anything intrinsically wrong with homosexuality, but rather straightforward epidemiology. Introducing an infectious agent into a population where sexual contact is the mode of transmission creates a perfect setup for spread. The speaker notes a concentration of cases in the New York Metropolitan Area (New York City and New Jersey) and in Los Angeles.

This disease initially affected the male homosexual population in the US. The spread was facilitated by sexual contact. The concentration of cases was observed in the New York metropolitan area, including New York City and New Jersey, as well as in Las Vegas.

Speaker 0 describes a unit in Saima that went into African countries; "And how was that done exactly?" "Through inoculation. Through vaccines. Vaccines." "Pretending to inoculate people and that type of thing. The idea being to kill black people? Yeah. To eradicate black people." "There you must understand the concept was that AIDS was a killer. It was incurable at that point in time, so it was led to believe that if infected people, it was the quick non militaristic approach to eliminate black people." "And that is something you know for a fact that AIDS was actively being Yes. Spread to Yes. Other countries? Yes. To African countries."

Children are now being affected by AIDS, which is concerning. Close contacts like household members are at risk, even without intimate or needle-sharing contact. This shows that AIDS can spread through everyday interactions, not just through specific activities.

The speaker discusses how the disease initially spread among the male homosexual population in the United States. They clarify that this does not imply anything negative about homosexuality, but rather it is a result of straightforward epidemiology. The concentration of cases was observed in the New York Metropolitan Area, including New York City and New Jersey, as well as in Los Angeles. The speaker emphasizes the importance of introducing an infectious agent into a population for it to spread.

The disease initially emerged in the male homosexual population due to straightforward epidemiology. An infectious agent was introduced into a group where sexual contact facilitated its spread. This resulted in a concentration of cases, particularly in the New York Metropolitan area and Los Angeles. The nature of the population and the mode of transmission created an ideal environment for the disease to proliferate.

Gays make up 2% of the world's population but are responsible for 45% of sexual assault.

Speaker 0 describes the plasma-derived hepatitis B vaccine as derived from “the most dangerous starting material” and asserts the starting material was blood heavily contaminated with HIV, collected from New York heroin users during what is recognized as the world’s first AIDS outbreak. He notes the vaccine’s development began with funds from Doctor Fauci’s agency, in collaboration with Tuskegee researchers, to cross-connect arteries of tranquillised chimpanzees and comatose humans, with mixed raw blood flowing between groups of chimps and humans to train the chimps’ immune systems on human hepatitis virus. The vaccine inventors warned it might work the other way as well and claims several chimpanzees tested positive for ancestors to HIV and Kaposi’s sarcoma herpes virus, the deadly combination behind AIDS; this serial passage between species is called gain of function. He concludes this created the safest vaccine we’ve ever used. Speaker 1 adds a claim about a hidden starting point: the blood used was heavily contaminated with HIV from New York heroin users, and that the vaccine’s development involved financing from Fauci’s agency and collaboration with Tuskegee researchers to cross-link chimpanzee and human circulatory systems. He states that the serial passage of viruses between species is now called gain of function and asserts this process produced HIV and Kaposi’s sarcoma herpes virus, and suggests the vaccine’s safety is paradoxical given these origins. Speaker 2 emphasizes responsibility and risk, noting AIDS’ cause was unknown at the time but fear centered on potential contamination of the vaccine with whatever caused AIDS. HIV was “sort of hanging over this vaccine like a cloud,” though he claims HIV couldn’t survive the treatments given to the vaccine. Speaker 0 transitions to Part II, a deep dive into the vaccine timeline, aiming to quickly reach the AIDS timeline ramifications. Speaker 3 provides a timeline framework: well-documented events through May 1983 to set the stage for two fiercely contested events now resolved by a federal investigation. Speaker 2 lists milestones: - 1950s: The world’s earliest confirmed HIV-positive being is a chimpanzee used to develop hepatitis B vaccines. - 1960s: Chimpanzees and New York heroin users cross-transfuse raw blood to generate chimpanzee antigens to fight human hepatitis. - 1972: Scientists at Doctor Fauci’s agency announce chimpanzee antigens protect humans from hepatitis B; first patent filed for a human vaccine made from chimpanzee antigens. - 1973: The world’s first recognized AIDS outbreak occurs among New York heroin users, the first group injected with chimpanzee plasma. - 1974: Thirteen thousand New York gay men recruited to test the vaccines. - 1975: NYBC and Merck file three patents, citing five vaccine examples all made from pure chimpanzee antigens; a circular extraction method akin to dialysis to extract large amounts of antigens for mass production. - 1978: After years of testing, nationwide placebo-controlled trials begin on gay men with NYBC’s New York trial and CDC trials mainly in California; first HIV-positive blood samples found in gay men, all collected from the cohort, all of the never-before-seen subtype B. - 1979: September—ten months into the trial—the scientist in charge wants to abort due to an unexplainable flare-up in precisely 11 participants who received the vaccine; aborting would harm the vaccine’s reputation. CDC soon reports unexplainable Kaposi’s sarcoma cases in gay men, noting that precisely eleven had the flare-up as of September 1979; by December, 19 cases and the first death, marking the onset of the world's second AIDS outbreak affecting the second group inoculated with chimpanzee plasma-derived vaccines. - 1981: A cancer researcher suggests a new infectious agent with a 50% mortality rate may be causing Kaposi’s sarcoma cases in vaccine trial sites and claims it was transmitted in the vaccine as disease progression occurred quickly in trial participants; trial scientists confirm incubation periods differ and are longer in gay men not in the trial. In the next 15 months, another 593 cases emerge and 41% die. Merck announces Heptavax B, a third US brand for domestic market; original HBVax and NYBC B Vax offered only overseas; a compromise to get FDA approval makes the new version from human blood, but without the circular chimpanzee extraction method it’s “too expensive” for large-scale use. - 1982: CDC names the disease AIDS; CDC asserts the FDA-approved vaccine uses only human blood, distancing it from earlier vaccines; WHO warns AIDS may be caused by a virus in the vaccine’s plasma. - May 1983: French scientists identify the causal virus, enabling testing of archived blood samples; it was a chimpanzee virus, and KS lesions required co-infection with a second virus found in those chimpanzees. This discovery enables verifying the AIDS origin theory: vaccine transmission by comparing HIV rates between men randomly given the hepatitis B vaccine versus a placebo during the trials. Speaker 3 notes two pivotal events in their chimp vax preprint, now settled, and states that in June 1983 two Fauci-associated scientists claimed infection rates in the New York trial were similar between vaccine and placebo; internally, they say Fauci’s scientists spread disinformation to defend the chimpanzee vaccine invention. Speaker 2 contends that the CDC claimed no difference in rates in 1984 but that the private study remains unreleased; the analysis implies nearly all HIV infections occurred in vaccinated participants, not placebo, based on limited data and interpretation. The narrative argues the CDC private study would have shown high HIV rates among the vaccine group, but details were obscured. It alleges the CDC’s withheld study used skewed comparisons to mask vaccine-associated HIV transmission. Speaker 3 briefly references Africa’s rollout in 1984, claiming AIDS emerged there a year after a symposium and that FDA officials shifted from chimpanzee vaccines to the human-blood Heptavax, enabling continued overseas sales. It asserts chimpanzee-based vaccines were widely used in poor countries by 1986, with Africa’s initial infections concentrated in newborns and young women; the WHO suppressed findings that HIV spread via medical injections, not needles alone, to protect immunization programs. Retroactive testing allegedly shows HIV was not present in most African countries before vaccination; after vaccination began, infection rates rose in certain regions. The speaker notes a group, ChimpFacts, as a best account of probable HIV origins, but mainstream preprint servers rejected it.

The disease initially affected the male homosexual population in the US, particularly in New York City, New Jersey, and Los Angeles. Introducing an infectious agent into this population through sexual contact facilitated its spread.

Many homeless men are sick and untested, some are dangerous. It's hard to trust anyone here.

The early belief was that AIDS was limited to the male homosexual community and IV drug users. However, it was later discovered that groups like Haitians and hemophiliacs were also affected, and there were concerns about transmission through blood transfusions. A recent article by Alasky revealed that children in close contact with individuals at high risk for AIDS showed symptoms identical to AIDS syndrome, suggesting that the disease could be transmitted through intimate contact rather than just sexual or blood transmission. This led to speculation in the media that AIDS could be spread through casual contact, causing unnecessary fear.

There is a dangerous and deadly disease called AIDS that poses a threat to everyone. It can be transmitted through sexual intercourse with an infected person, affecting both men and women. Although it has mainly affected small groups, it is spreading. It is crucial to protect yourself by being aware and informed. Ignoring AIDS could lead to death, so it is important not to die due to ignorance. This message was conveyed in a public information film.

This is about society destroying normality and basic human biology. People in demon outfits are pushing inclusivity, even around children. Men in goblin demon costumes are getting too close to kids, which no species would allow. This needs to stop now.

AZT is the only drug available because it's the only one proven safe and effective in scientific trials. While progress may seem slow, many drugs are in clinical trials. These trials aim to determine their safety and effectiveness. Drugs in trial include Alpha interferon, dideoxycytidine, phos carnate, and al seven twenty one, either alone or with AZT. The virus is spreading heterosexually, but not as explosively as in the homosexual population years ago. Complacency should be avoided. In the US, heterosexual spread is concentrated among IV drug abusers and their partners, particularly in areas like Manhattan, South Bronx, New Jersey, and Miami. Regarding one scientist's claims, they are considered extraordinary and off base. He puts forth a negative hypothesis without offering alternatives, creating anxiety among infected individuals who may perceive a conspiracy.

The Pentagon once considered building a "gay bomb" that would make enemy troops sexually irresistible to each other. The proposal, made by an Air Force lab in 1994, suggested using strong aphrodisiacs to induce homosexual behavior. The Pentagon confirms the proposal but claims it was rejected. However, a Berkeley watchdog group found evidence that the proposal was submitted to the highest scientific review body in the country. The idea of a gay bomb is offensive to many, including the gay community and military personnel who were dismissed under the "don't ask, don't tell" policy. The military currently denies working on a gay bomb.

No one responded when I asked for proof. Everything was rushed in the case of AIDS, with no proper research or debate among scientists. The announcement was made without solid evidence, and a veil of secrecy was placed over an approximate truth. This is not how science works. Normally, you conduct experiments, analyze the results, and verify them before making a scientific announcement. But in this case, they held a press conference and declared that HIV is the cause of AIDS. They didn't explain why or provide any scientific references. There is no scientific reference, just a collection of arguments and indirect evidence.

The disease initially spread in the male homosexual population in the US, mainly in New York City, New Jersey, and Los Angeles. The infectious agent was introduced through sexual contact, leading to a concentration of cases in these areas.

I believe it's possible that the AIDS virus is a result of genetic warfare testing by American agents.

AIDS can be transmitted before an individual develops infections and is classified as having AIDS. The spread of the disease is facilitated by sexual contact. It's important to note that there are many individuals who already have the defect but are not classified as having AIDS. The statistics on AIDS only consider full-blown cases and do not account for the large number of individuals with the defect. The transmissibility of the disease is another crucial aspect to consider.

Dr. Strecker discusses the origins and transmission of the AIDS epidemic. He challenges the belief that the disease came from African monkeys and suggests it actually started in the 1970s in Africa during a smallpox vaccination program by the World Health Organization. He also questions the idea that AIDS is solely a venereal disease, as it can potentially be transmitted by carriers like mosquitoes. Dr. Strecker highlights that the virus can survive outside the body, contradicting previous assumptions. The government's involvement and the labeling of AIDS as a homosexual disease are also questioned, as the outbreak coincided with a hepatitis B vaccine program. The assumption that homosexuals were responsible for the disease lacks logical validity.

This transcript recounts a premise called “the mouse paradise,” a scientific experiment from the nineteen sixties. It describes placing four females and four males and letting them multiply. The population exploded—“Hundreds and thousands.” Then “something strange happened. They stopped mating. And within four years, they were extinct.” The stated reason was “social interaction overload.” The mice faced “twenty four seven interaction with thousands of others,” leading to “too much stimulation, too much competition for social status.” As a result, many males became so called “the beautiful ones,” losing interest in females and groomed themselves all day, withdrawing completely. The females, in turn, followed by losing interest in males. The outcome: “no mating and they all just died without having babies.” The narration draws a parallel to humans, asserting that “since twenty ten smartphones, humans are living the same social interaction overload.” It describes “twenty four seven status competition, income and lifestyle comparison with thousands of others,” and “physical looks to impossible standards.” It contends that many young people “just choose to withdraw.” It claims, “For the first time in history, young people are having less sex than their parents.” The data point given is that “Thirty percent of men 30 had no sex for a year.” The speaker labels this trend as a “loneliness epidemic” that “hits us harder than any virus could.” The closing lines emphasize a contrast between the mice and humans: “The mice couldn't turn this off.” Yet the speaker asserts personal agency for the listener: “But you, you can.”

The speaker questions if the virus could be one of those predicted in the late seventies that escaped from a laboratory and infected certain populations. They find it strange that AIDS initially affected specific groups, such as black Africans and middle-aged sexually active men, but not others. The speaker traces the origins of AIDS in America to government experiments conducted on gay men in cities like New York, San Francisco, and Los Angeles in 1978. They believe that AIDS in America does not come from Africa, although they acknowledge the existence of African AIDS.

Speaker 0: A child born in a hospital in The United States today, within an hours of coming from source into this body, the first thing that happens to them is pharmaceutical intervention without really asking, barely informed consent. That child's eyes are smeared with erythromycin ointment, and they're given a hepatitis B vaccine in their first day of life. And the hep B vaccine is for hepatitis B, which is a sexually transmitted disease, an IV drug user disease, of course, which babies are not gonna be exposed to, and yet every single baby in America is getting the intervention. So from the literally the day we are born, we're— Speaker 1: I these mean, why not test the pregnant mother for those? Speaker 0: They do. Speaker 1: Okay. Speaker 0: So They give it to the women who even if they have tested negative— Speaker 1: they give majority. Absolutely. So I don't understand why would you treat a child on his first day of life for illnesses you know for a fact he doesn't have, it isn't gonna get? Speaker 2: So a child's born let's just take the sign. The child's born. Hep B is spread by two routes, sexually transmitted disease or intravenous needles. So my one day old isn't going to be having sex or doing heroin right away. So what's the purpose of getting this on the schedule in the first day of life, the first hours of life? Speaker 0: And if you push, and I welcome anyone to do this with their doctor, you get to two things. You get to the American patients are too stupid to remember, so we need to do it right away. That's literally like what they say. And then my doctor told me that that a child at daycare could trip over a needle that has hepatitis B on it. That's literally what they get to. Speaker 2: That a needle could be on the playground that somebody just did heroin or something, threw the needle down, and it has hepatitis B blood on it. I asked the doctor, has there ever been in human history a case of hepatitis B two being transferred that way? They said no. It's only through intravenous needles and sex. So you actually to to just to steel man this, and, again, welcome anyone to respond, there is not actually a scenario absent of intravenous needles or sex, that a person gets hepatitis b. Speaker 0: There is not a reason for this to be given.