TruthArchive.ai - Related Video Feed

Josh Green, the governor of Hawaii, spoke at the United Nations Economic and Social Council in New York City. He highlighted Hawaii's achievements in sustainability and renewable energy. Hawaii, being an island state, has taken the lead in promoting renewable energy and was the first state to mandate 100% renewable energy for electricity. Despite its small size, Hawaii has a significant impact due to its position in the Pacific. The forum aimed to implement the United Nations' sustainable development goals by 2030.

I first stumbled across agenda 21 in about 2008, and my first reaction was to dismiss what I was reading because I didn't believe that any government in Australia would take us down this road. Then I began to see a legislative pattern emerging in parliament which concerned me greatly, and I also started to see the tenor of legislation that we were passing. I did air those concerns in parliament, and it was dismissed and ignored. The words agenda 21, ladies and gentlemen, were never meant to be spoken. And if they were, then, of course, it would be dismissed as a conspiracy theory. Because if people knew agenda 21 and what it stood for, there's plenty of information out there where they could actually learn what the end game was, and governments didn't want that to be known. My dad always said to me that people only lie for two reasons. One reason is because you're ashamed of what you're doing, and the second reason is that you don't want people to be warned just before you screw them. And I honestly believe that these secrets have been kept for both of those reasons. Ladies and gentlemen, the origins of the environmental movement as we see it began back in 1968 when the Club of Rome was formed. The Club of Rome has been described as a crisis think tank which specializes in crisis creation. The main purpose of this think tank was to formulate a crisis that would unite the world and condition us to the idea of global solutions to local problems. In a document called the first global revolution authored by Alexander King and Bertrand Schneider on pages 104 and 105, it stated, in searching for a new enemy to unite us, we came up with the idea that pollution, the threat of global warming, water shortages, famine, and the like would fit the bill. All these dangers, of course, will be caused by human intervention that will require a global response. That's the origin of global warming, ladies and gentlemen. In 1975, Australia agreed to bring in a new economic order via the Lima Declaration on the second conference of the United Nations Industrial Development Organization. The outcome of this was, as I said, the Lima declaration which was a blueprint for the redeployment of tools, jobs, and manufacturing to the developing nations, leaving countries like Australia short of technology, a manufacturing base, and jobs. Blind Freddy can now see what the outcome of that has been for our country with their unworkable trade and tariffs agreements hand in hand with this that have followed as a matter of course. This has now become a reality with around 90% of our agriculture and manufacturing just gone. Australia signed the Lima declaration in 1975 and hundreds of others with the support of all major political players, Whitlam, Fraser, Hawke, Keating, Houston, Howard, Rudd, the democrats, the greens, and even the Nationals. It has been put to me that all of these treaties were the foundation for the rollout of agenda 21. And it seems that Australia has been moved around the global chessboard, and our so called leaders were either complicit or naive to the long term consequences. And now we're almost at checkmate. Sorry. In 1992, former president of The United States George Bush senior said, effective execution of agenda 21 will require a profound reorientation of human society unlike anything the world has ever experienced. A major shift in the priorities of both governments and individuals and an unprecedented redeployment of human and financial resources. This shift will demand that a concern for the environmental consequences of every human action will be integrated into individual and collective decision making at every level. Cutting through the code, I want everyone here tonight not familiar with agenda 21 to consider what the words profound reorientation of all human society and unprecedented redeployment of human and financial resources actually means. For everyone here tonight not familiar with agenda 21, I would suggest that this is the beginning of your learning curve, not the end. In 1992, Morris Strong, secretary general of the UN Earth Summit and member of the Club of Rome said, it is clear the current lifestyles and consumption patterns of the affluent middle class involving high meat intake, consumption of large amounts of frozen and convenience foods, use of fossil fuels, ownership of motor vehicles, small electrical appliances, home and workplace air conditioning, and suburban housing are not sustainable. Put those statements together with the previous one, and it must become clear that agenda 21 is about controlling every aspect of our lives, how we eat, what we eat, how much we eat, how we move around, food production, the amount of food, and where we even live. Dixie Ray, former Washington state governor and assistant secretary for oceans and international environmental and scientific affairs stated, agenda 21 seeks to establish a mechanism for transferring the wealth from citizens to the third world. Fear of environmental crisis would be used to create a world government and UN central direction. From a report in the September Habitat One Conference, land cannot be treated as an ordinary asset controlled by individuals and subject to the pressures and inefficiencies of the market. Private land ownership is also a principal instrument

Speaker 0: United Nations agenda 21, sustainable development. It is the inventory and control plan. Inventory and control of all land, all water, all minerals, all plants, all animals, all construction, all means of production, all food, all energy, all information, and all human beings in the world. And this is a plan that was agreed to by a 179 nations back in 1992. It's a United Nations plan. It's called the agenda for the twenty first century. And so many of us around the world think that a sustainable development just sounds so great. Isn't it about recycling and creative reuse and creating energy and food resources for everyone? And the answer is no. It really is not. It's about moving populations into city centers, concentrated city centers, and clearing them out of the rural areas. It's constructed of non governmental organizations, corporations, and government in order to dictate and what it is that happens around the world. Regionalization is the stepping stone to globalization and globalization is the standardization of all systems. All systems have to be brought into harmony in order to control them all. And the goal of agenda 21 is one world government and total control from a central unit. The principles are public private partnerships, which is fascism. And this is how it's implement it on the ground is through this joining together between corporations, nongovernmental organizations, and governments in order to cut out the actual individual, your voter, and instead to take that to a level where we literally cannot penetrate. This is a corporatocracy. It's a totalitarian state to being developed right now all over the world while we are moving towards the endgame. We are not there. And this is the opportunity that all of us have now to stand up, to speak out. We are free, and we need to continue to be free. And I do believe that we will win, but we have to become aware that there is a fight.

The narrative prior to the focus on climate was centered around the Cold War, which justified a powerful federal government. In 1991, the Club of Rome, including leaders like Mikhail Gorbachev and Al Gore, met and proposed a new justification for global control: the environment and climate change. This plan was outlined in the book "The 1st Global Revolution." Scientists now emphasize the urgency of the climate crisis, but this top-down approach based on scientism disregards other important aspects of society. The World Economic Forum, in partnership with the UN, plays a critical role in implementing the agenda. Surprisingly, there are connections between the World Economic Forum and China, raising questions about the true motivations behind the sustainable development agenda. It appears that power and control, rather than genuine environmental concern, drive this agenda.

The Interdevelopment Goals aim to implement them worldwide, starting with the EU. A recent resolution highlighted the role of the IDGs in supporting the SDGs. It emphasized the significance of SDG 17, Partnerships for the Goals, and recognized the innovative role of open source initiatives like the Interdevelopment Goals Initiative. These initiatives aim to educate, inspire, and empower individuals to drive positive change in society, ultimately accelerating progress towards achieving the SDGs.

Hawaii aims to become the first US state to run entirely on clean energy. Governor Josh Green highlighted the state's sustainability achievements at the United Nations Economic and Social Council. Hawaii, as an island state, has been at the forefront of promoting renewable energy and was the first to mandate 100% renewable energy for electricity. The governor emphasized the state's unique position in the Pacific and its ability to make a significant impact despite its small size. The forum aimed to support the United Nations' sustainable development goals for 2030. The video also mentions concerns about the impact of smart city development on small businesses and the economic transformation of Lahaina China into a smart city.

The IDG focuses on inner development, but not on individual well-being or the planet's health. Their goal is to achieve the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). However, the United Nations believes that they grant rights and prioritize actions that benefit the collective good over individual rights. This contradicts American values, which state that rights come from God and that the government's role is to protect and uphold those rights.

There are tools available if things go in the right direction. Governments have to be accountable and play an important role.

United Nations Agenda 21 is a plan agreed upon by 179 nations in 1992. It aims to inventory and control various aspects of the world, including land, water, minerals, plants, animals, construction, means of production, food, energy, information, and human beings. Contrary to popular belief, Sustainable Development is not just about recycling and creative reuse. It involves moving populations into concentrated city centers to regulate global activities. The ultimate goal is to establish a 1 World Government and achieve total control from a central unit. This is implemented through public-private partnerships and the use of chips. It is important for us to be aware of this development and stand up for our freedom.

People are recognizing the harms of climate disinformation and the existence of toxic information ecosystems, demanding change. Brazil's G20 presidency is prioritizing information integrity as fundamental to progress. UNESCO has been working on media literacy, releasing guidelines for regulators. The UN released Global Principles on Information Integrity in June. A global digital compact was adopted by member states, including a section on information integrity, reinforcing the importance of viable information. It also calls for assessing the impact of mis- and disinformation on sustainable development goals.

Cognitive dissonance arises when beliefs clash with actions, hindering UN's SDG progress. People struggle with sacrificing freedoms for collective goals or feeling overwhelmed by climate collapse. Resolving dissonance involves changing beliefs, actions, or perception of tasks. UN faces challenges in persuading individuals to support SDGs by rewiring beliefs and actions. For instance, transitioning to sustainable energy may lead to energy scarcity and higher prices, deterring those valuing personal freedom. To overcome this, UN aims to manipulate empathy, mindfulness, and critical thinking to align individuals with collective goals.

Speaker 0 outlines a narrative linking the origins of the environmental movement to the Club of Rome, described as a crisis think tank that purportedly specializes in crisis creation. The speaker cites a document, The First Global Revolution by Alexander King and Bertrand Schneider, claiming it states that pollution, global warming, water shortages, famine and similar dangers would fit the bill as a new enemy to unite the world and justify a global response to local problems, thereby claiming “the origin of global warming.” The speaker then connects this to Australia, asserting that in 1975 Australia accepted a new economic order via the Lima Declaration at the UNIDO conference. The Lima Declaration, they say, was a blueprint for redeploying tools, jobs and manufacturing to developing nations, leaving Australia short of technology, a manufacturing base and jobs, and that unworkable trade and tariffs agreements followed. They claim these treaties were the foundation for the rollout of Agenda 21 and contend Australia has been moved on a global chessboard with leaders either complicit or naive to long-term consequences. The segment cites 1992 remarks by former U.S. president George Bush Sr. about Agenda 21, describing it as requiring a profound reorientation of human society and an unprecedented redeployment of human and financial resources, integrating concern for environmental consequences into decision making at every level. The speaker urges the audience to consider the implications of “profound reorientation of all human society” and “unprecedented redeployment of human and financial resources.” The speaker references Morris Strong, then secretary-general of the UN Earth Summit, stating that affluent middle-class lifestyles are not sustainable, including high meat intake, frozen foods, fossil fuels, vehicle ownership, and other consumption patterns. The implication drawn is that Agenda 21 is about controlling every aspect of life—what and how we eat, how we move, food production, quantity of food, and where we live. Dixie Ray, former Washington state governor and assistant secretary for oceans and international environmental and scientific affairs, is quoted as saying Agenda 21 seeks to transfer wealth from citizens to the third world. A fear-based trajectory is described where fear of environmental crisis would be used to create a world government with UN central direction. The speaker quotes a Habitat One report suggesting land cannot be treated as an ordinary asset and that private land ownership contributes to social injustice, implying a redistribution of wealth through land and resource control. A report from the president’s council on sustainable development is cited as advocating a new collaborative decision process for better decisions and more rapid change in resource use. Harvey Ruben of the Wildlands Project and Jay Gary Lawrence are invoked to suggest that individual rights would be subordinated to the collective, and that participating in UN-planned processes would provoke conspiracy-minded groups to resist, leading to alternative labels like comprehensive planning or sustainable development. The narrative claims that costs are rising for citizens while services are cut, portraying this as wealth redistribution and redeployment of resources that harms the working poor. It references debates over land rights and water allocation, the native vegetation act, and development and planning acts as threats to food producers and long-term security, with alluding to heritage status used to justify control over land titles. The speaker argues for legislative Council checks and balances as a safeguard against parties colluding to pass restrictive policies, urging public participation to restrain erosion of common law, and portraying agenda 21 as an ongoing threat since 2008. The account then traces the Club of Rome’s 1972 Limits to Growth and its environmental alarmism, linking Ted Turner and Mao to early endorsements of the movement, and cites 1987 and 1996 statements about a new world order and an environmental crisis unlocking a one-world government. It asserts the Earth Summit produced the Earth Charter, co-written by Morris Strong and Mikhail Gorbachev, as a new set of commandments with environmentalism as a new world religion, and connects this to Agenda 21. Ted Turner’s 1996 reductionist population statements are included, along with a 1998 Baltimore Sun report on Turner’s donations to the UN aimed at stalling population growth and supporting sterilization to “save mother earth.”

The narrative prior to the focus on climate change was centered around the Cold War, which justified a large and powerful federal government. In 1991, the Club of Rome, including influential figures like Mikhail Gorbachev and Al Gore, met and proposed a new justification for global control: the environment and climate change. This plan was outlined in the book "The 1st Global Revolution." Scientists now emphasize the urgency of the climate crisis, but this top-down approach based on scientism disregards other important aspects of society. The World Economic Forum, in partnership with the UN, plays a crucial role in implementing the sustainable development agenda. Surprisingly, there are connections between the World Economic Forum and China, raising questions about the true motivations behind this agenda. It appears that some proponents of environmental protection are more interested in power and control than in genuinely safeguarding nature.

To achieve their goals, they aim to rewire people's brains and change their beliefs and actions. This involves interventions like emotional regulation and resilience to navigate behaviors necessary for the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). They use social-emotional learning (SEL) in education and other sectors to manipulate individuals through initiatives promoting inner development and mental health. For instance, to achieve net zero emissions, they target those who prioritize personal freedom and individuality over collective good. They aim to brainwash them using empathy, mindfulness, compassion, and critical inquiry to override their existing beliefs. They also teach resilience and emotional regulation to motivate scared youth to take action against climate change. All these efforts aim to promote pro-social behavior aligned with the UN SDGs.

The inner development goals highlight the need for personal growth and shifts in order to achieve sustainability. Making the right decisions is crucial for reaching these goals. Mental health and well-being are supported by spirituality and faith, and education should focus on meaning and purpose rather than just delivering content. It is important to prioritize the world and be excited about it. However, it is also necessary to acknowledge that selfishness and environmental problems persist despite decades of scientific progress. Building a strong foundation for the future is crucial, but it requires training and action.

The Mental Leadership Act builds on the Earth Summit's Agenda 21 for global environmental action. It calls for sustainable development and the creation of a United Nations sustainable development commission. The President is urged to report progress to Congress. The resolution is supported by the administration, the State Department, and major US environmental organizations. The Earth Summit provided an important opportunity to protect our planet for future generations. The United States must assert its leadership in achieving this goal. The speaker urges colleagues to support the resolution.

Klaus Schwab and the World Economic Forum are applauded for initiating the eco industry initiative and integrating it into the forums' work. This initiative will influence proposals presented to governments at the 1992 Earth Summit. It is hoped that this will provide a basis for a new role for business after 1992, positioning them as principal implementers of the movement toward a sustainable planet. The 1992 conference will emphasize the need for significant changes in motivating economic life at both the corporate and individual levels.

Agenda 2030, signed by every national government in 2015, aims to transform every aspect of our lives. The UN General Assembly called it the master plan for humanity. The plan includes transforming agriculture, food, and all aspects of life. The World Economic Forum is promoting insect farming as part of this plan. They are building the largest insect protein manufacturing facility in Decatur, Illinois. However, a concerned parent shared that their 5th grader was told in school that bugs are the food of the future and that eating meat is bad for the planet. The government claims bugs are sustainable, but research funded by the government shows that the chitin in bugs can lead to serious health issues. The goal of Agenda 2030 is not to save the planet.

Recent progress has brought challenges like scarce resources and climate change. To achieve sustainable development goals, all sectors must invest in promoting health and well-being. Ways to start include integrating health into policies, having a champion for support, engaging all stakeholders, and creating a supportive governance structure. Collective efforts are crucial to reach the SDG's goals.

Politicians, officials, and future leaders will be trained in 23 skills across 5 domains, similar to social emotional learning (SEL) competencies. SEL aims to rewire everyone's brains, not just students, to achieve the UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). However, cognitive dissonance arises when individuals' beliefs conflict with the actions required by the SDGs. Resolving this dissonance can be achieved by changing beliefs, changing actions, or altering perceptions of the actions. The UN faces challenges in convincing people to become agents of change for their goals by 2030.

We wanted to show what happens when you go beyond GDP and consider human potential. So, we made investments in areas like homelessness, mental health, and combating domestic and sexual violence. We looked at the well-being and environmental impact of people in self-isolation and made decisions based on that. This approach was new for us, but we hope other countries consider it as a potential model.

The Mental Leadership Act, also known as HCONRes 353, proposes a national strategy for sustainable development in line with Agenda 21. It suggests the creation of a specific office and the appointment of a high-level government official to coordinate these efforts. The resolution also encourages the United States to establish agreements for global environmental protection and to form a United Nations sustainable development commission. The president is expected to report to Congress on the progress made. HCON Res 353 has received support from the administration, the State Department, the Foreign Affairs Committee, and various environmental organizations. It emphasizes the need to sustain our planet and its resources for future generations.

Our theory of change is to ensure that everyone, not just top leaders, has the resources and training to do this work. We have partnered with progressive companies like Ikea, Spotify, Ericsson, and Google, who not only sponsor this initiative but also train all their employees. Some companies even aim to spread this in society. We are in talks with Apple to have this in every iPhone, although it may take 1 or 2 years due to internal bureaucracy. To establish credibility, we have collaborated with universities such as Stockholm University, Stockholm School of Economics, Lund University, Harvard, Atmos, Paris University, and Danish Technical University.

Companies like Panorama have measured students' values and beliefs in social emotional learning. Similarly, those who aim to influence our beliefs and actions towards the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) need quantitative ways to assess the effectiveness of their interventions. These skills may be tracked throughout our lives, connected to virtual credentials and blockchain technology. The lack or presence of these competencies could lead to rewards or punishments, such as promotions or travel restrictions. The ultimate goal is to shift our economy from capitalism to a well-being or post-growth model, which some view as a form of communism. The concept of inner development goals could serve as a starting point to engage people in more complex frameworks and theories, including those who are typically left behind, such as conservatives.

Josh Green, the governor of Hawaii, spoke at the United Nations Economic and Social Council in New York City. He highlighted Hawaii's sustainability achievements and its role as a leader in promoting renewable energy. Hawaii was the first state to mandate 100% renewable energy for electricity. Despite being a small state, Hawaii's unique position in the Pacific allows it to have a significant impact. The forum aimed to implement the United Nations' sustainable development goals by 2030.