reSee.it - Related Video Feed

Joe Biden's involvement in bribery doesn't require money to be directly sent to him. If his son, Hunter Biden, spent money on his behalf, that's enough. Additionally, Hunter Biden's actions violated the Foreign Agents Registration Act, with Joe Biden's help. Lastly, President Trump's disregard for federal law, such as with student loans and the asylum program, can be seen as high crimes and misdemeanors. These are all potential grounds for impeachment that should be thoroughly examined.

Joe Biden pardoned his son, Hunter Biden, on his last day in office, which has sparked controversy. This action is unusual, especially considering the incoming administration led by Donald Trump. Biden's decision seems driven by a lack of trust in how his family would be treated under Trump's justice department. What are your thoughts on this? Let me know in the chat.

Hunter Biden is not a victim; he has been enabled by Joe Biden, who used him for personal gain, as suggested by emails indicating a 10% cut for the "big guy." The initial strategy was to have a DA slow-walk the case, but public pressure forced a plea deal that was overly lenient. This deal was described as "carefully negotiated" to benefit Hunter, but it faced criticism for being unjust and unlikely to hold up in court. The backlash revealed the deal's flaws, leading to its eventual collapse.

Have you ever heard of someone innocent receiving a preemptive pardon? It seems unlikely, especially when it involves the president's family and associates. Seeking pardons suggests concern over potential wrongdoing. If someone is innocent, why would they need a pardon? Preemptive pardons imply that crimes may have occurred, even if not publicly known. If the president grants these pardons, it could be seen as protecting his family from external threats, but it raises questions about guilt. The idea of a permanent pardon for individuals like Giuliani or the president's children is troubling, especially if they haven't been convicted of any crime. If the president pardons anyone, many would interpret it as an admission of guilt. Recently, it was reported that President Biden will pardon his son, Hunter Biden.

What do you think about the breaking news? This pardon is deflating for those who have warned about Trump being a unique threat. Biden's actions suggest that his son Hunter is above the law, contradicting his previous statements about accountability. This situation mirrors past political decisions, like Trump's pardon of Sheriff Joe Arpaio, which received little backlash. While many might not be surprised by Biden's decision, it deepens public cynicism towards politics. This cynicism ultimately benefits Trump, as he can argue that all politicians act similarly when it comes to their families. Biden's move appears selfish and politically counterproductive, only reinforcing Trump's position.

Preemptive pardons are being discussed for individuals potentially targeted by Trump, including members of Congress and Anthony Fauci. Although these individuals haven't requested pardons, there is speculation about Fauci's risk due to allegations of lying to Congress, which could lead to felony charges. Evidence from his private emails supports these claims. Additionally, there are expectations that Biden may pardon his brother Hunter, who has a significant criminal history, and possibly himself. The precedent set by Hunter Biden's pardon, which covered all potential future accusations, raises the possibility of similar actions for Fauci and others.

Hunter Biden's lawyers allegedly impersonated the House Ways and Means Committee to request the removal of evidence in his potential plea deal case. The lawyer for the committee had sought to file evidence against the deal. The judge threatened Hunter's lawyers with sanctions for this breach, which could potentially lead to disbarment. This incident highlights the desperation and unprofessionalism of Biden's team. The story is still unfolding.

President Biden has committed to respecting the legal process regarding his son, stating he will not pardon him if convicted. This decision highlights a stark contrast with Donald Trump, who has criticized the justice system after his own conviction. Biden's stance emphasizes his belief in the rule of law, asserting that no one is above it, including his family. He has made it clear that he will accept the jury's verdict, reinforcing the integrity of the judicial system. This moment underscores the difference in how each leader approaches accountability and justice, with Biden prioritizing the law over personal ties.

Joe Biden was involved in meetings, dinners, and golf with Hunter Biden and his associates. He conditioned $1 billion in American tax money on firing a prosecutor linked to a company Hunter was on the board of, where he earned $1 million annually.

Mike, it wasn't surprising that Joe Biden pardoned his family at the end of his term. The Hunter Biden pardon indicated that James Biden, who was involved in Hunter's business dealings, would also be pardoned. If Hunter's activities were criminal, the new Justice Department could have pursued investigations through James. The Biden family's involvement in these deals raises concerns about potential crimes, and the pardons aim to prevent any investigations. With a pre-pardon, there’s no basis for launching an investigation, as the Justice Department would lose the ability to seize evidence or documents related to the case.

Everyone anticipated Biden would pardon his son, but the extent of his dishonesty is shocking. Democrats are realizing they aren't the party of moral superiority; they've lied about numerous issues, including the laptop and the lab leak. This has led to a loss of faith in their principles. All politicians lie to protect their interests, but Trump is different—he openly states his intentions. Biden's blanket pardon raises questions about a potential money laundering scheme involving Hunter Biden, who is connected to numerous legal troubles. Calls for impeachment arise, but Republicans hesitate due to a lack of evidence. Ironically, Trump faced impeachment for investigating what Biden just pardoned his son for, highlighting the hypocrisy surrounding foreign influence on the first family.

President Biden has committed to respecting the jury's decision regarding his son and has ruled out any possibility of a pardon. This stance highlights a significant contrast with Donald Trump, who has criticized the justice system following his own legal troubles. Biden's acceptance of the trial's outcome reflects his dedication to the rule of law, emphasizing that no one is above it, including family. In contrast, Trump has suggested he would pardon individuals involved in the January 6th insurrection. Biden's decision not to intervene in his son's case underscores his belief in the judicial process and sets a moral example, reinforcing the importance of accountability within the legal system.

Joe Biden is being accused of accepting a bribe, and it is believed that the timing of the indictments against him and his son, Hunter Biden, was planned. The head of Burisma, the company that hired Hunter, was arrested and had $23 million seized. Five days later, Hunter was appointed to the board of the company. He is accused of bribing Joe and Hunter with $5 million to get the charges dropped. Despite being arrested and kicked out of the country, the charges against him were mysteriously dropped two years later. This scandal may lead to Biden being removed from the presidency.

They didn't just pardon Hunter; they effectively concealed 11 years of activities that could reveal Joe's involvement. Evidence exists, including checks and references to "the big man." This pardon was not merely about Hunter; it also obscured Joe's actions during that time. Additionally, there were lies told to the American public leading up to the election, and after it, they did exactly what was anticipated. This is not the end; expect more family members to be pardoned in the future.

The Department of Justice (DOJ) made a secret deal to protect Joe Biden, according to the speaker. They didn't follow the usual procedure of listing all components of the plea agreement, instead putting the important part in a separate confidential document. During a hearing, the judge became uncomfortable and asked if the DOJ had ever given immunity for unrelated crimes, to which the prosecutor said no. This led to the unraveling of the deal, as it was revealed that there was an open investigation. The DOJ wanted to keep this information away from Congress, arguing that it didn't have to be disclosed under FOIA. The speaker suggests that both sides were working together to protect Joe Biden.

Hunter Biden's involvement with a Ukrainian energy company while his father, Joe Biden, was Vice President is questioned. Joe Biden claims he didn't know what his son was doing and only found out after he joined the board. He trusts his son and sees no reason to investigate further. The interviewer suggests that as Vice President, Joe Biden should have been more aware of his family's activities, but Joe Biden dismisses the idea. He deflects by mentioning the issues surrounding Trump's family. Joe Biden believes there is no evidence to suggest any wrongdoing on his son's part.

Republicans, including Indiana Senator Jim Banks, are highlighting a specific timeframe regarding Joe Biden's pardon for Hunter Biden, particularly noting that it extends back to 2014, the year Hunter joined Burisma's board. This broad timeframe may fuel ongoing accusations against Hunter, suggesting he must have committed crimes to warrant such a pardon. Biden's statement indicates that the charges against Hunter arose from political pressure from his opponents, and a plea deal fell apart due to disagreements over potential future charges. While some argue Hunter was treated differently than others in similar situations, the lengthy investigation and limited charges suggest a narrative of unfair persecution, which the president seems to support, linking it to his own political standing.

Joe Biden, as Obama's vice president, got a Ukrainian prosecutor fired who was investigating the energy company Burisma, where his son Hunter was on the board. The fired prosecutor, Viktor Shokin, claims that Biden and his son took bribes. The White House denies this. The Atlantic published an article suggesting that Hunter Biden may have broken laws. However, it is important to note that Shokin was widely seen as corrupt and not investigating corruption. The Obama administration initially supported Shokin but later wanted him gone. There are allegations that Hunter Biden used Air Force 2 for his business dealings. The investigation into Hunter Biden's activities continues.

President Biden has committed to respecting the judicial process, stating he will not pardon his son, Hunter, if convicted. This decision highlights a stark contrast with Donald Trump's approach to legal challenges. Biden emphasizes the importance of the rule of law, asserting that no one, including family, is above it. While Biden accepts the jury's verdict, Trump continues to claim the system is rigged against him. This situation underscores the differing values between the two leaders, with Biden prioritizing legal integrity over personal loyalty. Ultimately, Biden's stance reinforces the principle that justice must be upheld, regardless of personal ties.

Biden's son, Hunter Biden, faced questions about selling the family name. He didn't show up for a meeting and could be held in contempt. Republicans are pushing for an impeachment inquiry resolution, which would give more weight to their subpoenas. If Hunter is held in contempt and prosecuted, he could face jail time. They plan to pass the impeachment resolution before Christmas, take a break, and resume after New Year. Once the resolution is passed, they may subpoena Hunter again, and he may be more likely to comply now that the inquiry is official. He fears potential prosecution if he ignores it again.

The Biden family used Joe Biden's name to make millions, with Joe's knowledge. Joe was dishonest about his family's business dealings. He met with his son's partners, used an alias for emails, and took actions coinciding with their business. During the 2020 campaign, a lawyer paid off Hunter Biden's taxes to avoid political risk. Hunter believed his legal issues would disappear when Joe became president. Joe benefited from his power, did not stop it, and lied about it.

Hunter Biden falsely claimed under oath that his father had no involvement in his business dealings, but evidence shows otherwise. Texts and testimonies reveal Hunter seeking his father's influence in business matters, contradicting his sworn statements. Bobolinski confirms President Biden is the family brand being sold.

Chris Cuomo discusses Biden's recent pardon for his son, arguing it provides Trump with a justification to attack Democrats. He emphasizes that Biden's reasoning—claiming political overreach—could backfire, as it mirrors Trump's defense tactics. Cuomo suggests that this move undermines the Democrats' stance on the rule of law, as Biden appears to validate Trump's narrative of a corrupt system. He warns that this will allow Trump and his supporters to retaliate politically, using Biden's own words against him. The discussion highlights a perceived hypocrisy within the Democratic Party, suggesting that their actions may not be as principled as they claim.

The Hunter Biden pardon primarily serves to protect Joe Biden, not just Hunter. The pardon covers all crimes Hunter may have committed since January 1, 2014, a date linked to significant events in Ukraine, including Hunter's involvement with Metabiota, a company tied to bioweapons labs. This connection raises questions about corruption and money laundering involving Joe Biden. The discussion highlights how past actions, such as Joe Biden's pressure to fire a Ukrainian prosecutor investigating Hunter, reflect a broader pattern of political maneuvering. Additionally, there are concerns about the implications of this pardon for future presidential actions and the potential for blanket immunity for other officials. The conversation also touches on the Biden administration's handling of illegal immigration and the need for accountability among government officials.