TruthArchive.ai - Related Video Feed

The speaker claims that the flu vaccine's purpose has shifted from preventing the flu to only lessening symptoms. A Cleveland Clinic study allegedly found the flu vaccine had a negative efficacy of 26.9% last winter. According to the speaker, this means that individuals who received the flu vaccine were 26.9% more likely to contract influenza. The speaker notes the study doesn't detail the pharmaceutical industry's profits from the vaccine or list its side effects. They state the side effects would be less than an mRNA vaccine, as it is a dead virus vaccine. The speaker reiterates that taking the flu shot allegedly makes one almost 27% more likely to get sick than not taking it.

Division scientists acknowledged the danger of a vaccine, but it was still used for three years while they examined the evidence against it. The vaccines didn't work as intended and contained a cancer-causing agent. However, removing the agent wasn't possible, so there was no alternative. Millions of people were subjected to deadly viruses due to this decision. American troops received a vaccine that prevented colds but caused cancer in lab animals. The pressure to test influenza vaccines caused internal stress, but it was deemed more important to use the vaccines than to remove them from the market. George's simple words are left as a parting thought.

It is nearly impossible to publish data that goes against the national public health narrative, preventing doctors from finding solutions. The speaker has conducted clinical trials for pharmaceutical companies, including vaccine studies, and has brought vaccines and other drugs to market. Some drugs never made it to market because they killed people. Clinical trial guidelines ensure safe drugs, but these guidelines were not followed during the pandemic, affecting everyone. COVID should have been a time for doctors to unite, but interference with research occurred. Science evolves through experiments, skepticism, and an open mind. Challenging current knowledge must be allowed to move science forward, but what the speaker witnessed during the pandemic was not science.

The speaker states that when the CDC considered mandating the chickenpox vaccine for children, they hired Gary Goldman, a contract scientist, to conduct a long-term study in Antelope Valley, California. The study allegedly found that mass vaccination with the chickenpox vaccine stops chickenpox but causes shingles epidemics later on, which are 20 times as deadly as chickenpox. Despite these findings, the speaker claims the United States mandated the vaccine for American children, whereas in Europe they do not. The speaker points to the British National Health Service website, claiming it says they do not recommend chickenpox vaccines because it causes shingles epidemics later on, and emphasizes the need to consider long-term effects, not just the immediate prevention of a single disease.

Doctors admit flu vaccine can be ineffective and harmful in larger doses, but still recommend it for elderly and chronically ill. Government criticized for not informing public about ineffective vaccines. Division of biologic standards tests vaccine safety, not effectiveness. Scientists found flu vaccine ineffective in the 1960s but were silenced. Adenovirus vaccine with cancer-causing contaminant given to soldiers despite scientists' warnings. Division director defends vaccine use, saying it took 3 years to assess risks. Troops injected with cancer-causing vaccine for 3 years. Some scientists prevented from publishing ineffective vaccine findings. Control officer raised concerns about flu vaccine potency in 1960.

Anthony Fauci is seen as a symbol of institutional corruption within organizations like the NIH and FDA. Other scientists, such as Frankie Kelsey and Bernice Eddie, who raised concerns about harmful substances in vaccines, were punished instead of being recognized. It seems that in order to succeed in these regulatory agencies, one must support the pharmaceutical industry. Fauci's longevity in his position is attributed to his ability to protect industry profits rather than public health.

The Department of Defense used shady contracting practices and laws to shield pharmaceutical companies from conducting proper clinical trials. They manipulated public perception with the help of mainstream media. The clinical trials were just a theatrical performance and not required by law. Human subjects were deceived, including a 13-year-old girl who experienced adverse events. The Vaccine Safety Council had an ad featuring her, but it was pulled from airing during the Super Bowl. Most clinical trial sites, investigators, and FDA employees were also deceived, as only a few top officials were aware of the scam.

In 1976, the U.S. had a mass vaccination program against the swine flu. At the time, the U.S. population was 220 million. After about a quarter of Americans were vaccinated, the program was shut down due to 25 deaths and 550 cases of Guillain Barre syndrome. The speaker asserts that "good old common sense" led to the conclusion that elective injections should not result in deaths. The speaker claims that deaths ultimately rose to 53, and apologies and reparations were given. The speaker concludes that it is unacceptable for anyone to die after an elective injection, and that this has always been the position of the U.S.

Vaccines eradicated smallpox and polio. The speaker was taught that vaccines are safe, effective, and necessary, and there's no reason to question it. Medical school rotations reinforced that vaccines are safe and effective, and the speaker was told to ignore the inserts because that's lawyer jargon. Medical school provided no education about vaccine contents, safety records, informed consent, or the vaccine injury compensation program. The speaker assumed the science was settled and didn't question vaccines.

CBS did a report 20 years ago that may shock you. The percentage of seniors getting flu shots sharply increased from 15% to 65%. You'd think flu deaths among the elderly would decrease, but they continued to climb. The NIH did a study, but then suppressed it. CBS got their hands on it, and the study revealed flu shots have not reduced deaths among the elderly. The lead author was not available for comment but a co-author, Dr. Reichert, said they were astonished by the results. They also found the same poor results in other countries like Australia, France, Canada, and the UK. The CDC is now looking at new strategies, but still recommends flu shots. They may shift toward vaccinating more children to protect the elderly.

Doctors at the Federal Communicable Disease Center acknowledge the flu vaccine and recommended dosage is ineffective, and in larger doses, harmful, but still recommend it for the old and chronically ill. A senate subcommittee charged the federal government with not informing the public about ineffective vaccines. The division of biologic standards tests vaccines for potency and safety but not effectiveness, which is left to manufacturers. Four scientists found the flu vaccine ineffective and refused to give it to their families; two were transferred, one left, and their findings were not published. The adenovirus vaccine, given to soldiers, contained a contaminant causing cancer in animals, but was taken off the market three years after scientists pointed out the danger. Doctor Murray justified using the vaccine, stating it took three years to examine the evidence. For three years, troops were injected with a cold-preventing vaccine causing cancer in animals. Some division scientists were allegedly prevented from publishing results showing some vaccines to be ineffective. A control officer in 1960 had doubts about the potency of the influenza vaccine, which were made known to the director.

"Over twenty years, the percentage of seniors getting flu shots increased sharply from fifteen percent to sixty five percent." "But no matter how they crunched the numbers, they got the same disappointing result. Flu shots have not reduced deaths among the elderly." "We realized that we had incendiary materials." "Doctor Reichert says they thought their study would prove vaccinations had helped." "Were you surprised?" "Astonished." "That study soon to be published finds the same poor results in Australia, France, Canada, and The UK." "Decades of promoting flu shots in seniors and the billions spent haven't had the desired result." "The CDC says they should still get their flu shots, that it could make flu less severe or prevent other problems not reflected in the totals." "But watch for the CDC to shift toward protecting the elderly by vaccinating more children and others around them who could pass the flu."

- In order to make a vaccine, so you first have to extract disease from an animal or a human. - Because you can't just inject live measles into a person. - You first have to do what they call attenuating it, which is to make it less virulent. - There's a myriad of monkey kidney cells that are still used today, they've been used for a very long time. - There have been monkey viruses that were finally, after thirty years, acknowledged to have been causing tumors in human beings, been associated, heavily associated with tumors in human beings. - In addition to that, there are various unknowns that can't be picked up during testing because if you don't know something is in a vaccine, you can't test for it. - Viruses, stray viruses have been found by third parties in vaccines.

Big problem with trusting the science is not the science part, it's who's behind the science part, primarily in the area of vaccines for children. Normally, when you study a drug, you compare it with a placebo, so that way you can truly test the side effects on something, but that is not how they test children's vaccines. This so called placebo control is not really a true placebo control because it's not inert. It's an active vaccine with something called an adjuvant. The big one that they've been using for a long time is aluminum. My question is, how can you really truly test the safety and effectiveness of something if you're looking at the relative safety of an active vaccine to another active vaccine with adjuvants. That just muddies the water to this whole safe and effective claim that you keep hearing over and over and over.

The division of biologic standards tests vaccines for safety and potency, but not for effectiveness. In the 1960s, four scientists found the influenza vaccine to be ineffective and refused to give it to their families. Two were transferred and one left the division. Their unfavorable findings were not allowed to be published. Another case involved the adenovirus vaccine given to American soldiers, which was found to contain a cancer-causing contaminant and was taken off the market three years later.

The speaker states that vaccines contained 40 different viruses that were being inactivated. The yellow fever vaccine contained leukemia virus due to the crude science of the time. The speaker says they were not reporting AIDS virus at the time, but they had a disease virus. The speaker says it was good science at the time because they didn't worry about these viruses.

The aluminum safety study that allowed aluminum into US vaccines was based on a study of four New Zealand white rabbits, but the results from one rabbit were lost, leaving only three. The rabbits were killed after 28 days with no cognition tests. Upon sacrificing the rabbits, the aluminum adjuvants were still present in their bodies. 94% of one type of aluminum adjuvant and approximately 70% of another remained. The aluminum was found in the kidneys, liver, heart, lymph nodes, bone marrow, and brain. Despite the study's flaws and horrifying results, the FDA and CDC declared aluminum adjuvants in vaccines safe and effective. The speaker asserts that anyone who reads the study would not want to inject their children with aluminum adjuvanted vaccines.

Vaccines are neither safe, effective, necessary, nor harmless, and this has been a two-hundred-year indoctrination. No vaccine has ever been proven safe because true placebos aren't used, and subjects aren't followed long enough. Safety is determined by whether the vaccine causes immediate death. Long-term effects like asthma, allergies, eczema, ADD, ADHD, neurological problems, and autoimmune diseases are not monitored. The FDA arbitrarily decided in the early 1990s that side effects appearing more than 72 hours after vaccination are unrelated.

the corruption of science, which I believe you just said. That is almost your number one goal. Right? Is try to bring integrity and credibility back to science, which has been corrupted by the people who pay for it, by federal health agencies being captured by pharmaceutical industries, by big pharma, by big food. In 02/2002, CDC did an internal study of Atlanta, Fulton County, Georgia children looked at children who got the MLR vaccine on time and compared those to kids who got them later. The data from that study showed that black boys who got the vaccine on time had a two sixty percent greater chance of getting an autism diagnosis than children who waited. The chief scientist on that, Doctor. William Thompson, the senior vaccine safety science at CDC, was ordered to come into a room with four other co authors by his boss, Frank DeStefano, who’s the head of the immunization safety press, ordered to destroy that data. And then they published it without that fact. It happens all the time. We are being lied to by these agencies. And we're going to change that right now.

A prototype vaccine is being deployed to the public without actually preventing transmission, which is keeping the disease more dangerous than necessary. This is a concerning public health response. The problem is that even if we acknowledge this issue, we don't know how to change it. People tend to believe that public health authorities are doing the right thing because the alternative seems hopeless. It's difficult to discredit them without sounding like they are deliberately harming public health. People find it hard to accept that medical officials in charge of our lives may have bad motivations.

The speaker claims a committee experienced typical conflict, but a specific conflict was particularly obvious. The Office of Inspector General and Congress investigated and urged change, but nothing happened. The speaker asserts this group committed medical malpractice by approving vaccines, increasing the number from 11 in 1986 to 69 and then 92. They state that, except for the COVID vaccine, none had pre-licensing safety trials with a true placebo. According to the speaker, these vaccines were introduced without safety studies, meaning the risk profiles are unknown. The speaker attributes this to corruption and agency capture.

Vaccinating birds with a leaky vaccine, one that doesn't provide sterilizing immunity, turns the flocks into mutation factories, teaching the organism how to mutate. This destabilizes the organism and makes it more likely to jump to animals. The speaker claims that all agency heads from NIH, CDC, and FDA advised against bird vaccination because it is dangerous for human beings.

Doctors at the Federal Communicable Disease Center admit the flu vaccine can be ineffective or harmful in large doses. Despite this, it is still recommended for older people and the chronically ill. A senate subcommittee criticized the government for not informing the public about ineffective vaccines. The division of biologic standards tests vaccines for safety but not effectiveness. Some scientists found the flu vaccine ineffective but were silenced. The adenovirus vaccine was taken off the market after causing cancer in animals, despite scientists warning about it. American troops were given a cancer-causing vaccine for 3 years. Some division scientists were prevented from publishing results showing vaccines were ineffective. A control officer in 1960 raised concerns about the flu vaccine's potency.

In 1976, the US government urged everyone to get a swine flu shot to prevent a potential nationwide outbreak. 46 million people complied, but now 4,000 Americans are seeking $3.5 billion in damages from the government due to negative effects from the shot. Two-thirds of the claims are related to neurological damage or death. In 1918 and 1919, the same virus caused a pandemic that resulted in over half a million deaths in the US and 20 million deaths worldwide.

The speaker, recently retired from a local hospital, claims widespread disbelief in flu shots among colleagues due to data issues, stating "the efficacy and I won't give you data. You created the data. Ten percent one year, eighteen percent the next, forty percent at best." They describe the flu vaccine given to children aged two to eight for nearly four years as ineffective, with a claimed three percent efficacy at times. The speaker contrasts this with their hospital experience, where doctors, nurses, medical assistants, patient care, and lab staff did not believe in the flu shot, until mandates and recommendations arrived. They express relief at retirement, saying their soul was sick about what they witnessed, and that conflicts of interest prevented them from speaking out while employed. They recount working on high-volume ER days with about 300 flu cases daily and claim they never contracted the flu, attributing this to personal practices: washing hands, taking vitamin D, and using a berry syrup. The speaker criticizes the shift from physicians and nurses to pharmacists administering the vaccine, accuses the system of bribing people with Target gift cards and marketing the vaccine as free, and denounces scare tactics. They observe an increase in vaccination across generations, noting "some of you are my age," with their generation having seven shots, their daughter ten, her son around sixty, and their new grandson expected to receive seventy-two vaccines, expressing shock at this escalation. The speaker references Robert F. Kennedy Jr., saying he fights for them and goes to court for kids who suffered, noting that Kennedy's family started Special Olympics. They claim that in Kennedy’s view, autism linked to vaccines is evident since there were no autistic kids in the past four decades, and allege that vaccines have caused autism. They describe watching a perfectly healthy two-year-old become a "severe autistic child" after vaccination, expressing certainty that autism exists because of vaccines. They forecast their 10-year-old grandson becoming an adult who, at age 40, would be walking in the mall with a diaper and a helmet. The speaker ends by thanking studies they claim are not done and reiterates their stance against vaccines, including autism implications, as presented in the narrative.