reSee.it - Related Video Feed

The member from Spadina, Fort York, addressed the prime minister regarding national security and the upcoming Hogue Commission report on foreign interference. He questioned the prime minister's ability to work alongside ministers who may not be serving Canada's interests, implying that at least one minister could be compromised. In response, the prime minister criticized the member's comments as disgraceful and irreverent, emphasizing the seriousness of national security issues. He pointed out that the member's alignment with the Conservative Party is concerning, as their leader lacks the necessary clearance for briefings essential to keeping Canadians safe.

The committee's report on potential treasonous behavior is concerning, but no charges have been filed. The government takes foreign interference seriously, with new measures in place. The public's right to know about involved parliamentarians is debated, especially with an upcoming election. Foreign interference is a significant threat to democracy, with authoritarian regimes seeking to undermine it. Vigilance and defense of democracy are crucial in the face of global challenges. Law enforcement, not politics, should handle enforcement actions.

Canadians demand transparency in investigating potential traitors. The government is cooperating with the Hogg Commission and providing necessary documents. The National Security Committee of Parliamentarians will also be involved. The opposition should refrain from making baseless claims in parliament.

A commission of inquiry must balance the need for transparency with protecting Canada's national security. It is important for the public and journalists to know if foreign actors targeted Canada's democratic process, but revealing sensitive information could harm national interests. While transparency is crucial, secrecy is also necessary in certain situations to prevent more harm than good.

The speakers discuss a dangerous and divided world, citing threats from Iran, Russia, and China, as well as changing security and commercial relationships with the United States. One speaker mentions having obtained top secret security clearance within three weeks to be informed and make decisions. He then points out that another speaker has refused the opportunity to obtain top secret security clearance for 950 days. The other speaker explains that while he previously held top secret clearance as a minister, he refused the recent offer because it would have gagged him under security law, preventing him from speaking freely about foreign interference without fear of prosecution. He claims Canada has experienced Chinese interference in two elections. He says that refusing the clearance allowed him to speak freely about issues such as a candidate who allegedly threatened a political opponent, and a quarter billion dollar loan obtained in China. The first speaker responds that robust debate has occurred despite the situation, and observes that China is not the only country accused of foreign interference.

The committee asked for information on how many of these so‑called police stations are operating currently in Canada, and whether any have been shut down. Response: There is deep concern about allegations and reports of foreign interference, including public reports of these so‑called police stations. The details of the investigation are the subject of ongoing initiatives by the RCMP, and questions about those details should be directed to the commissioner. The subsequent question specifically asked the commissioner to provide information to Canadians on how many of these alleged stations are operating in Canada, have operated previously, and if any have been shut down. Answer: Currently, we’re looking at three of the police stations in Toronto and one in Vancouver. We’re working with our police jurisdictions as well as with other Government of Canada national security agencies. An investigation has been initiated and is led by the Greater Toronto Integrated National Security Enforcement Team (INSET). So far, elements of the investigation have been very overt—there have been marked police cars and uniformed members to cause disruption to the allegations. We’ve released that visible presence, and that’s mostly so that people will see the actions, for two reasons: first, because we need more information, and second, so that when police are in the area dealing with the allegations, people will come forward. The investigation is ongoing, and while the details can’t be discussed publicly, a statement in October/November indicated that an investigation was underway into reports of possible activities at those locations. The committee member then asked for clarification: Can you confirm that you know the locations of these supposed police stations, and that RCMP in uniform have been at those locations causing disruption? Response: No. In the initial instances, instead of disruption by going in uniform with marked police cars, the approach was to speak with the people involved at those police stations or locations because those locations are a legitimate business in the front. The committee then asked for a timeline on when the investigation would conclude and whether the allegations are true. The conversation moved to indicate the inquiry would continue, but no specific conclusion timeline was provided in the exchanged statements.

We are proud to have infiltrated cabinets globally. A constituent asked about outside interference in democracy, referencing Klaus Schwab from the World Economic Forum boasting about infiltrating half of Canada's cabinet. They requested transparency on which ministers support the WEF's agenda. The audio and video quality were poor, causing disruption. Mention of Prime Minister Trudeau's involvement was made. Translation: We are proud to have infiltrated cabinets globally. A constituent asked about outside interference in democracy, referencing Klaus Schwab from the World Economic Forum boasting about infiltrating half of Canada's cabinet. They requested transparency on which ministers support the WEF's agenda. The audio and video quality were poor, causing disruption. Mention of Prime Minister Trudeau's involvement was made.

I am currently seeking answers regarding classified briefings to ensure none of my MPs have ties to foreign powers. If any do, they should not run in the next election. Other party leaders should do the same. The federal government should be more engaged in defending Quebec regarding bill 96.

The speaker claims that every Canadian prime minister has been compromised by agents of influence working for Chinese intelligence. This poses a significant security risk, raising concerns about who is truly in control of the country. They suggest the need for an independent investigation to protect against future threats, citing Australia's law against foreign interference as a model to follow.

An open letter to Prime Minister Mark Carney, signed by a retired detective and an active RCMP sergeant, accuses the Liberal government of ignoring national security risks, exposing Canadian intelligence agents, and targeting political opponents. The letter alleges CSIS mishandled the Meng Wanzhou/Two Michaels crisis and provided bad intel to the RCMP, leading to a flawed investigation that attempted to link Conservative party members to Chinese interference without proof. The unredacted documents exposed Canadians involved in covert operations in China. Nine Liberal MPs—Marco Mendicino, Dominic LeBlanc, Bill Blair, David McGinty, Anita Anand, Stephen McKinnon, Melanie Joly, Arif Varani, and Christina Freeland—are accused of inaction or obstruction regarding foreign interference and national security breaches. The RCMP officer who sent the letter had previously informed Trudeau about these issues, but the government allegedly did nothing. CSIS is accused of abusing its powers and smearing innocent Canadians. The speaker urges viewers to research and share this information, citing a lack of transparency and honesty in the Canadian government.

Our government is committed to ensuring the safety of our research institutions amidst growing threats. We are investigating issues at the Winnipeg Labs and taking necessary actions. Unfortunately, the Conservative party is using this serious matter for political gain, spreading conspiracy theories and hindering progress. Responsible debates are welcome, but weaponizing national security is not the way to go. It's disappointing to see certain members suddenly vocal on security issues while remaining silent on other important matters. This behavior is not fitting for an official opposition.

Canada's top lab collaborated with a Chinese Army Major General, allowing access to Chinese students and a scientist from the PLA. Concerns were raised about national security and potential espionage. The Minister of Health defended the collaboration as part of efforts to combat Ebola. Accusations of reckless behavior and cover-ups were exchanged between the Minister and opposition members. The Minister emphasized the importance of maintaining national security and avoiding political interference in public health agencies.

The NDP has called for a public inquiry into allegations of foreign interference, specifically from the Indian government. The Minister agrees that the inquiry should investigate interference from the Modi government. The safety of Canadians and the integrity of the rule of law are of utmost importance. Law enforcement and intelligence agencies are actively investigating in collaboration with their US counterparts. The government expects full cooperation from India in this investigation. No further comments will be made due to the ongoing nature of the investigation. Thank you, Mr. Speaker.

The speaker from Halton Hills accuses the government of neglecting national security, citing documents that show collaboration between Canadian government employees and Beijing's biological weapons unit. The Health Minister's claim that no sensitive information left the country is contradicted by the documents. The speaker questions if the minister still supports those comments. Translation: The speaker criticizes the government for ignoring national security concerns and collaborating with Beijing's biological weapons unit. The Health Minister's statement that no sensitive information left the country is disputed by the documents. The speaker questions if the minister still stands by those remarks.

The Prime Minister is accused of covering up a national security breach involving collaboration with Beijing military scientists. The Minister of Health deflects by highlighting achievements like National Pharma Care. The opposition criticizes the Prime Minister for ignoring Beijing's interference and allowing access to sensitive biological information. The Minister denies the accusations, stating that the scientists involved were Canadian citizens who deceived the Public Health Agency of Canada, leading to their dismissal and an ongoing RCMP investigation.

The speaker questions outside interference in democracy, referencing Klaus Schwab's claim of infiltrating governments. They ask for transparency regarding Canadian cabinet ministers involved with the World Economic Forum. Another member interrupts due to poor audio and video quality. The discussion shifts to disinformation and the need to address it. Translation: The speaker raises concerns about outside influence in democracy and asks for transparency about Canadian cabinet ministers involved with the World Economic Forum. Another member interrupts due to technical issues and the conversation shifts to disinformation.

Speaker 0: We are proud to have penetrated the cabinet. Speaker 1: A constituent asked about outside interference in our democracy. Klaus Schwab, head of the World Economic Forum, boasted about infiltrating governments worldwide, including over half of Canada's cabinet. Can the member disclose which cabinet ministers support the WEF agenda for transparency? Speaker 2: Sorry for the poor audio and video quality. I'm unsure if the member...

A Globe and Mail reporter asked about a Liberal candidate's ties to China-friendly groups and the speaker's meeting with the Jiangsu Commerce Council of Canada, a "pro-Beijing group." The reporter questioned if the Liberal party is comfortable with Peter Yen's closeness to the Chinese consulate, given the foreign interference inquiry. The speaker denied ever hearing of the Jiangsu Commerce Council of Canada and refuted having a "setup meeting" with them. They stated that attending events and taking pictures with people does not constitute a meeting. Regarding Peter Yen, the speaker defended him as someone who has served his community for decades, including as deputy police commissioner. They asserted that Yen's meetings with community groups were part of his job and that they are proud to have him as a candidate.

We are proud of our influence in government. A constituent asked about outside interference in democracy, specifically regarding Klaus Schwab, head of the World Economic Forum. He claimed that the WEF has infiltrated over half of Canada's cabinet. In the interest of transparency, could you name the cabinet ministers aligned with the WEF's agenda? Order, please. The question is important, but the audio and video quality are poor. I apologize for that. The younger generation, including Prime Minister Trudeau, is involved.

The member for Oshawa raised concerns about outside interference in democracy by the World Economic Forum. They questioned which Canadian cabinet ministers support the WEF's agenda. The discussion was interrupted due to technical issues. Another member criticized spreading disinformation. A member from Lambton Kent Middlesex thanked a colleague for their speech and asked for more details on the legislation.

The speaker claims that not only the current government, but all previous governments have ignored their warnings about interference. They believe it took so long for this information to come out because of partisan politics and the influence of Chinese intelligence agents. According to the speaker, every prime minister and government office has been compromised, posing a significant security risk for Canadians. They suggest the need for an independent investigation and the implementation of laws similar to Australia's 2017 law against foreign interference to protect the country's future.

The Prime Minister addressed concerns about foreign interference, emphasizing the measures taken to protect Canada. He highlighted the creation of oversight bodies and tools to safeguard democracy. He mentioned the ongoing foreign interference commission and the upcoming testimony before the commission. The Prime Minister reiterated the integrity of the 2019 and 2021 elections, confirmed by a nonpartisan panel. The focus remains on addressing challenges and ensuring the safety of Canada's democratic processes.

A scientist at the National Microbiology Lab collaborating with Chinese agencies raised security concerns. The government is investigating and taking steps to ensure safety. The Conservative party's focus on political attacks and conspiracy theories is hindering progress. Responsible leadership is needed to address national security issues effectively.

The speaker claims that both the current and previous governments have ignored their warnings about interference. They believe there are two reasons for this delay: partisan interests and infiltration by Chinese intelligence agents. According to the speaker, every prime minister and government office has been compromised by these agents. This poses a significant security risk for Canadians, as it raises questions about who is really in control of the country. The speaker suggests the need for an independent investigation and the implementation of laws, similar to those in Australia, to protect against foreign interference.

Prime Minister Justin Trudeau addressed allegations of Chinese interference in Canada's elections, stating he has not received any information from security agencies regarding federal candidates receiving money from China. Reports suggest that intelligence officials briefed Trudeau about China targeting Canada, including funding a network that supported 11 candidates in the 2019 election. A National Security and Intelligence Committee of Parliamentarians highlighted significant foreign interference threats from countries like China and Russia, which aim to exploit Canada's openness and manipulate its political processes. Trudeau emphasized the importance of public concern for democracy and acknowledged attempts by China to interfere in Canadian elections in 2019 and 2021. In response, China's foreign ministry criticized Trudeau's remarks, urging Canada to refrain from statements that damage bilateral relations.